Hi Dierk,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:10:04 +0100GMT (31/10/2001, 22:10 +0800GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?
DH> Because at the moment - and it is a lng moment as of now - there
DH> is no DLL with a "correct" version number. It doesn't make s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Han!
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 8:45:32 AM you wrote:
> Personally I'd recommend getting this one: http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpdisk/
> (Use the NT version if you run Windows 2000)
You may also have a look at the PGP version from CK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander!
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 12:51:36 PM you wrote:
> Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?
Because at the moment - and it is a lng moment as of now - there
is no DLL with a "correct" version number. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:15:22 +0530, Pkroy [P] graced us with these
comments:
...
P> i am new to bat1.53 and i like its features..
P> want to use PGP features but couldnot configure ..
P> can anyone help..
Well, you can use TB! using PGP Tray which d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:12:07 +0700, Han Thomas [HT] wrote these
comments:
...
HT> Yes... I will.. but PGP has been under development for decades.
HT> SecureBat is very promising, but it is new. There will be
HT> weaknesses. So even with SecureBat I'd
Hello David,
> You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor
Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?
> and replace the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall
> correctly) with 6.5.8.
Well, that didn't work. But if that is the only reason why the numbers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:43:40 +0100, Mrten [M] graced us with these
comments:
...
M> i think i have a tendency to go off-topic on this list, apologies :)
e-mail security? Off-topic? Nah. :-) It's very relevant and Ritlabs
has a very good solution for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op woensdag 31 oktober 2001 schreef Han Thomas:
> Personally I'd recommend getting this one:
> http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpdisk/ (Use the NT version if you run
> Windows 2000)
please, if you must use PGPdisk, download from http://www.ipgpp.com/
Hello Alexander,
Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 10:49:48 AM, you wrote:
AL> Why does it show 6.0.2i instead of 6.5.8??
You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor and replace
the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall correctly) with
6.5.8. Then if you sign a message you'
Hello pkroy,
Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 12:59:00 PM, you wrote:
p> i am new to bat1.53 and i like its features..
p> want to use PGP features but couldnot configure ..
If you've never used PGP before then it's probably best if you download and
install it and read the documentation. It takes so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello World Cruise Travel,
On Sunday, October 21 2001 at 09:57 PM PDT, you wrote:
> Is it possible to set up PGP to work from The Bat! ?
> I mean, with some buttons on the menu bars?
AFAIK, no... There is no way to add a button on the Toolbars... i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Melissa!
On Monday, October 22, 2001 at 7:21:00 AM you wrote:
> I don't use any of the plug-ins, so someone else will have to provide
> more details as to their degree of integration. But the basic answer
> is yes - it is possible.
Regarding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, October 21, 2001, at 9:57:32 PM PDT, World Cruise Travel
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is it possible to set up PGP to work from The Bat! ? I mean, with
> some buttons on the menu bars?
Hello,
The Bat! currently has plug-ins for PGP v2.6.3 through
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello junk,
On Wednesday, October 03 2001 at 11:46 AM PDT, you wrote:
> I recently downloaded PGP v7.0.3 but it appears that The Bat! cannot
> recognize it and only gives me the option of using its own internal
> implementation. Is there any way to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 03 2001 at 11:16 AM PDT, ::Andrew:: wrote:
> I'm just thinking about getting to know pgp or similar in terms of
> email encryption. Does anyone have any tips on what software is best
> / where to download / how to implement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mrten-dop,
On 04 September 2001 at 16:26:26 +0200 (which was 15:26 where I live)
mrten-dop wrote to Dierk Haasis and made these points:
md> (are we off-topic yet?)
(yes)
This has been a very well conducted and intelligent discussion. I'm
sad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ::Andrew::!
On Tuesday, September 04, 2001 at 10:59:22 AM you wrote:
> You're saying that the only weakness in PGP is the fear of weakness?
> That's the only known way to break it?
OK, that was the very short version. Here comes a slightly mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ::Andrew::!
On Tuesday, September 04, 2001 at 1:28:23 AM you wrote:
md>> the source-code is available for all versions up to 6.5.x (x=3, i
md>> think)
> i just downloaded 6.5.8 so i hope it's ok ;)
If you d'l the one I wrote about - CKT -, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 03, 2001, at 02:03:18 PM PDT, mrten-dop wrote:
> don't try to use the 7.0.x builds as there is no bat! plugin (see
> downloads-area at www.ritlabs.com).
Though there are other reasons some may not want to use a 7.x version
(sour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ::Andrew::,
On Tuesday, September 04, 2001 at 23:18:11 +0100, ::Andrew:: [] wrote
concerning 'pgp/gnupg':
A> I'm also not clear where the pgp dll's have to be put..
You can just place them in the TB! folder.
- --
Best regards,
David
** OK,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ::Andrew::!
On Monday, September 03, 2001 at 8:16:52 PM you wrote:
> I'm just thinking about getting to know pgp or similar in terms of
> email encryption. Does anyone have any tips on what software is best
> / where to download / how to
Hello daveiw,
Saturday, September 01, 2001, 12:35:44 AM, you wrote:
dcn> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
dcn> Hash: SHA1
dcn> Hi all,
dcn> Does this release mean that we will soon see a Bat plugin dll? Also
dcn> could anyone please tell me whether my PGP disk (ckt version) CD-R's
d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, August 05, 2001, 5:14:32 AM, Thomas F wrote:
> No, this was a bug a few versions back. I wonder whether you
> have made a full install of 1.53o (which will give you all the
> new help files, DLL's, etc) or whether you have just copied
> the .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
on Sat, 4 Aug 2001, at 21:04:18 local time (GMT -0700), Nick wrote:
NA> Your signature on this message was "Bad":
same here ... both with PGP 6.5.8ckt and GnuPG 1.0.6.
the first post was good by the way ...
- --
Rob
using The Bat! 1.53o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Vince,
On Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 9:24:48 PM -0700, you wrote the
following in regards to "PGP Noise":
> PGP is v6.5.8, word wrap is set for column 76.
> °ô¾°ô¾|
There are those characters you were mentioning, but this time your
chara
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Vince,
On Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 8:34:00 PM -0700, you wrote the
following in regards to "PGP Noise":
> Is it possible that the problem only occurs with mail sent from
> certain accounts?
Either that or only when you reply to messages t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Vince,
On Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 10:41:53 AM -0700, you wrote the
following in regards to "PGP Noise":
> I have noticed a problem over the last several months when trying to
> send PGP-signed messages. Intermittently, what looks like a s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Per your advice, I actually did a complete uninstall of The Bat,
> including deleting the program directory. Reinstalled the 1.53d full
> version from the site, then copied over the 1.53o executable. Sadly,
> this *doesn't* seem to have fixed my pro
Hello Vince,
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001 19:07:23 -0700 GMT (05/08/2001, 10:07 +0800 GMT),
Vince Beltz wrote:
VB> Followup to my previous response - I've sent out probably twenty
VB> messages this afternoon, all manually signed by copying body text to
VB> the clipboard and signing via PGPTray (including
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, August 04, 2001, 8:41:53 PM, Vince Beltz wrote:
> I have noticed a problem over the last several months when
> trying to send PGP-signed messages. Intermittently, what looks
> like a short (~1-10 characters) string of gibberish
[...]
One q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:53:20 -0400, junk wrote these words of wisdom:
...
jmc> I cannot get The Bat! v1.53d to recognize the PGP DLLs I downloaded
jmc> from RITLABS' site. I placed them in The Bat! program directory and
jmc> rebooted the machine- no
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:53:20 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I cannot get The Bat! v1.53d to recognize the PGP DLLs I downloaded
> from RITLABS' site. I placed them in The Bat! program directory and
> rebooted the machine- no luck. I added the program directory to the
> PATH environment variable
Hi Marck,
Historians believe that Tue, 3 Jul 2001 at 11:14 GMT +0100 was when,
Marck D Pearlstone [MP] typed the following:
MP> I have a pet hate in TB. That pet hate is named "Folder Templates".
The only thing I would add is that folder level templates are
dangerous when people use the %TO, %
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 03 July 2001 at 09:05:56 +0200 (which was 08:05 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to Chema Berian and made these points:
>> ***This is an Automated Reply***
DH> Something is definitely wrong here. Have changed anything in your
DH> PGP
Hello Benson,
BW> Does TB! support PGP 6.5.8? I've installed it, changed TB
BW> settings so that the PGP folders could be found, made sure
BW> PGP is in my PATH, and nothing works :(
Have you installed the PGP plug-in dlls from RIT site? TB! needs
them to integrate with PGP.
Best regards,
Serg
Hi Nick,
On Wed, 30 May 2001, at 23:09:48 -0700 you wrote:
NA> It's not so much the source code... but the SDK, and NAI have
NA> said that won't be released until PGP 7.x has been
NA> modularized. Well PGP 7.1 Beta, which is the modularized
NA> version, is closed now so hopefully the release vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday May 30, 2001 at 10:53:54 PM, Lars Geiger wrote:
T>> Any support for PGP 7.03 yet?
> No, not before the source for PGP 7.03 is published.
It's not so much the source code... but the SDK, and NAI have said that
won't be released until PG
Hi Tersiocity,
On Wed, 30 May 2001, at 21:48:23 -0700 you wrote:
T> Any support for PGP 7.03 yet?
No, not before the source for PGP 7.03 is published.
--
Regards,
Lars
The Bat! 1.53 Beta/11 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 31 May 2001 00:18:04 +0100, Jan wrote these comments:
JK> okay, that works really. But it's boring to choose the recipents every
JK> time manually, the plugin does ist by itself (if I wrote a mail to
JK> [EMAIL PROTECTED], it was encrypted au
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On Wed, 30 May 2001, at 23:57:25 [GMT +0100] (6:57 PM where I live) you
wrote the following in regards to "PGP 7.x.x?":
> I was wondering, if I can get PGP 7.x work with TB! Is there
> any possibility? 6.5.x works fine with the plugin, but t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 30, 2001, at 3:57:25 PM PDT, Jan Kesten wrote:
JK> I was wondering, if I can get PGP 7.x work with TB! Is there
JK> any possibility? 6.5.x works fine with the plugin, but this
JK> version doesn't ;-(
HotKeys and PGPtray. They work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 16, 2001, at 9:01:33 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Just did a dummy run. The answer is the plug-in. I will do the same
> again - signed from the tool tray and you'll see it's fine.
Yes, it is in the Plugin. My last message was signed via t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
On 16 May 2001 at 08:35:16 -0700 (which was 16:35 where I live) Nick
Andriash wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
NA> Yes, I've noted that when you hit the reply button on Marck's
NA> messages, the delimiter is ignored for s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 16, 2001, at 8:38:25 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
> Confirmed, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
On your messages it doesn't... but on mine, it does.
Win98SE with PGP 7.1, GnuPG 1.0.5 through GnuPGShell 1.76 and WinPT 0.2.0
Nick
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter!
On Wednesday, May 16, 2001 at 11:19:36 AM you wrote:
> I don't know why, but you seem to make something right. I've also
> already noticed the PGP-delimiter is used meanwhile, but, it's
> harm, not all the time. YOUR mails I can reply t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 16, 2001, at 2:19:36 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> (I haven't tested all yet), but I got a PM from "Marck D. Pearlstone",
> where "the trick" didn't work :-(
Yes, I've noted that when you hit the reply button on Marck's messages,
the delimit
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday, May 16, 2001 at 9:53:17 AM you wrote:
NA> It sure does on my machine, and I have no Regex's in my reply Template. If
NA> I take any message of mine and hit the reply button, all information below
NA> my delimiter is omitted.
I don't know why, but you seem to make some
Hi Nick,
On Wed, 16 May 2001 00:53:17 -0700GMT (16/05/2001, 15:53 +0800GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
>> No. You have to use a RegEx to cut off the sig, if it is different from
>> the basic dash-dash-space-enter. TB does *not* recognise
>> dash-space-dash-dash-space-enter as a sig delimiter.
NA> It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 16, 2001, at 12:34:06 AM, Thomas wrote:
> No. You have to use a RegEx to cut off the sig, if it is different from
> the basic dash-dash-space-enter. TB does *not* recognise
> dash-space-dash-dash-space-enter as a sig delimiter.
It sure does o
Hi Nick,
On Tue, 15 May 2001 22:19:49 -0700GMT (16/05/2001, 13:19 +0800GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> At first glance it would appear not. The signature delimiter is "hyphen
NA> hyphen space", and even though a PGP signature will dash escape that text,
NA> The Bat! will still recognize the delim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 15, 2001, at 9:52:10 AM, Paddy L wrote:
> I am just beginning to incorporate PGP in my e-mail. Using Tools >
> OpenPGP > Import OpenPGP Key, doesn't seem to work. Nothing occurs at
> all when I use this.
Paddy, importing a Key and verifying a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 15, 2001, at 9:56:48 AM, Paddy L wrote:
> Have I properly formatted the PGP signature and the cut off (-- )?
At first glance it would appear not. The signature delimiter is "hyphen
hyphen space", and even though a PGP signature will dash esca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David,
On Tue, 15 May 2001 19:45:12 +0200 GMT (16/05/01, 01:45 +0800 GMT),
David van Zuijlekom wrote:
T>> What I do is go to Tool / PGP / Check PGP Signature. Usually it owrks,
T>> but your key doesn't seem tobe on any server.
DvZ> Yes, but y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On Tuesday, May 15, 2001 at 01:27:07 +0800, Thomas [T] wrote
concerning 'PGP, Import Signature':
PL>> I have tried to import signatures from several different TBUDL member
PL>> messages (Nick A., Dierk H., et al) and have tried Help an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Paddy,
On Tue, 15 May 2001 09:52:10 -0700 GMT (16/05/01, 00:52 +0800 GMT),
Paddy L wrote:
PL> I have tried to import signatures from several different TBUDL member
PL> messages (Nick A., Dierk H., et al) and have tried Help and searched
PL> my
Hello Paddy,
On Tue, 15 May 2001 09:56:48 -0700 GMT (16/05/01, 00:56 +0800 GMT),
Paddy L wrote:
PL> Have I properly formatted the PGP signature
Probably (if I could only check it).
PL> and the cut off (-- )?
That one is being mutilated by PGP signing. There is a RegEx to
correct it.
--
Che
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 12, 2001, at 4:25:31 AM, A Curtis Martin wrote:
> AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures.
> However, to decrypt an encrypted message to you, you only need your
> private key to decrypt it. The messages encryptio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 11, 2001, at 11:56:22 PM, Silviu Cojocaru wrote:
> It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to
> someone, with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ?
Correct. Contained within that Public Key are all the User Pre
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 12 May 2001 06:25:31 -0500 GMT (12/05/2001, 19:25 +0800 GMT),
A Curtis Martin wrote:
T>> Would she? I think you do need the sender's public key to drecypt a
T>> message. Maybe I'm wrong about this?
ACM> AFAIK, you only need the senders public key to verify their signatures.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 May 2001 18:42:34 +0800, Thomas contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
GE>> Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa,
GE>> she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to
GE>> verify the sig
Hello Gerd,
On Sat, 12 May 2001 11:03:49 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 17:03 +0800 GMT),
Gerd Ewald wrote:
GE> Even if B doews not have the senders public key, in our example pKa,
GE> she would be able to decrypt the message. She wouldn't be able to
GE> verify the signature but she could reveal the pla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David!
On Saturday, May 12, 2001 at 9:18:02 AM you wrote:
> No. You can encrypt the message to as many keys as you like the minimum is
> one i.e. the recipient. However this is a bit silly as once encrypted you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas !
On Sat, 12 May 2001 16:38:41 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was 12.05.2001, 10:38 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
>>> And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I
>>> sent to him/her, that user must have *my*
Hello Gerd,
On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:50:25 +0200 GMT (12/05/2001, 15:50 +0800 GMT),
Gerd Ewald wrote:
>> And in order for that someone to read the encrypted message I
>> sent to him/her, that user must have *my* public key right ?
GE> No, the recipients needs his/her secret key to decrypt the me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Silviu Cojocaru !
On Sat, 12 May 2001 09:56:22 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was 12.05.2001, 08:56 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
> It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send
> to someone, with PGP, I need his/her
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Silviu
On 12 May 2001 at 09:56:22 +0300 (which was 07:56 where I live) Silviu
Cojocaru rearranged electrons to get
> It seems that in order for me to encrypt the messages I send to someone,
> with PGP, I need his/her public key, is this true ?
Hi Nick,
@ 7:44:06 PM on 5/5/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:
...
BC>> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is
BC>> now the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC>> aggravating.
NA> The 'feature' is something Maxim calls "Smart Matching", but I
NA> agree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 5, 2001, at 3:57:55 PM, Brian Clark wrote:
BC> Yes, I reported this a few weeks ago. Maxim stated that this is now
BC> the desired behavior, but, IMO, it's not desired. It's really
BC> aggravating.
The 'feature' is something Maxim calls "Smar
Hi Request,
@ 4:22:26 PM on 5/5/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
rbfcu> For example in the AB I have someone named Joe Bloggs who's email is
rbfcu> [EMAIL PROTECTED] . In PGP keys this person's key is shown as Joe
rbfcu> Bloggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
...
rbfcu> Does all that make sense? :)
Yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian,
On 25 April 2001 at 20:20:57 -0500 (which was 02:20 where I live)
Christian Dysthe wrote to TBUDL and made these points:
CD> this is not a big problem, but I still would like to know why it
CD> happens: When I OpenPGP sign a mess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 4:41:17 PM you wrote:
> "Cyber Knights Templar".
To dwell on this a bit:
As you may know PGP until recently was on a restricted export list
from the US. The programme itself was classified as a weapon
(dep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Let me point you in this direction:
http://www.mccune.cc/PGPpage2.htm#7.0Annoyances
This is a place I found a few days ago, there's some great info there,
in particular take a look at the last paragraph:
"Issues that remain with PGP 7.0.3"
where it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ottar,
On 22 April 2001 at 16:09:02 +0200 (which was 15:09 where I live)
Ottar Grimstad wrote to A Curtis Martin and made these points:
ACM>> In this case I recommend the ckt version of PGP
OG> What does ckt mean?
"Cyber Knights Templar".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ottar,
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, at 15:18:10 [GMT +0200] (9:18 AM where I live) you
wrote the following in regards to "PGP":
OG> I have downloaded the pgpdlls and moved them to my Bat catalogue.
OG> When I use the Tool, PGP, Choose PGP-version, I d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:18:10 +0200, Ottar wrote these comments:
OG> When I use the Tool, PGP, Choose PGP-version, I do not have the
OG> option to select 7.0.3.
This is because a plugin for PGP 7.0.3 is not yet available.
OG> When I try to sign
Hi Shauna,
on Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:36:26 -0600 GMT (which was 22.04.2001, 00:36
+0100 GMT where I live) Shauna Scott wrote:
> So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
> downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
> get it to work with The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Shauna!
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 1:25:17 AM you wrote:
SS>>> Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous
> message, the
SS>>> signature status comes up "bad" because I made a change to the
> message
SS>>> after signing it?
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 01:25 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:
...
SS> That's what I figured, but, of course, I didn't think of it until
SS> after I hit send the first time.
SS> Thanks.
You're welcome.
*** PGP Signature Status: good
*** Si
On 22-04-2001 at 00:36, Shauna Scott kindly wrote:
> So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
> downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
> get it to work with The Bat.
> If I look under Tools->OpenPGP->Choose OpenPGP Version, the only
> ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:46 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:
SS> Am I correct in assuming that, when I verify my previous message, the
SS> signature status comes up "bad" because I made a change to the message
SS> after signing it?
Hi Sha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 22, 2001 at 00:36 (my local time), Shauna Scott wrote:
SS> So, as you can see, instead of doing the work I should be doing, I've
SS> downloaded and installed PGP 6.5.8ckt build 05. The next trick is to
SS> get it to work with The Bat
Hallo Shauna,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:39:36 -0600 GMT (21/04/2001, 10:39 +0800 GMT),
Shauna Scott wrote:
SS> (I'm actually only using the beta on the office computer, the home
SS> computer is still on 1.51).
Funny; for me it's the other way round: no betas in the office. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Saturday, April 21, 2001 at 3:07:40 AM you wrote:
> Freeware or Payware?
If you want to use it in a non-business environment stick to freeware.
> PGP is available in both flavours and in versions
> 6.5.8 and 7.0.4. What are your sec
On April 20, 2001, at 7:39:36 PM, Shauna Scott wrote:
> I see we're practically neighbours, at least compared to many of the
> others on this list (I'm in Edmonton).
Hey... What do you think about those Oilers!! :o)
Nick
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=N.J.
Hi Nick,
@ 9:07:40 PM on 4/20/2001, Nick Andriash wrote:
...
NA> However, from what I've read, there is a current problem with the
NA> PGP Plugin (which *had* worked nicely with both NAI and the CKT
NA> builds of PGP) surfacing in the latest Beta's. I see you are using
NA> Beta 7. :o(
The plug-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On April 20, 2001, at 4:54:21 PM, Shauna Scott wrote:
> I'm about to take a look at implementing PGP -
Good to hear, and welcome to the PGP Community. :o)
> which version should I use?
Freeware or Payware? PGP is available in both flavours and in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick Andriash !
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:59:47 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 31.03.2001, 19:59 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
> Gerd, can you tell me if you compiled GPG yourself, or did you install one
> of the pre-compiled Win32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 31, 2001, at 1:04:27 AM, Gerd Ewald wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4d (r3/Cygwin) - GnuPGshell v1.60
Gerd, can you tell me if you compiled GPG yourself, or did you install one
of the pre-compiled Win32 version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerd!
On Saturday, March 31, 2001 at 11:04:27 AM you wrote:
> And to finish this: now a new attempt to use GPG properly
Works!
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.52 Beta/1
Window
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerd,
@ 4:04:27 AM on 3/31/2001, Gerd Ewald wrote:
...
> And to finish this: now a new attempt to use GPG properly
Came out just fine here.
- --
Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer
PGP is spoken here: 0xE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk Haasis and Roland!
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:36:58 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 31.03.2001, 10:36 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
> Checks out fine.
Thanks for informing me. You replied on my message
which didn't arrive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerd!
On Saturday, March 31, 2001 at 9:28:57 AM you wrote:
> Ok, now let's try the standard version PGP 6.5.8ckt
Checks out fine.
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.52 Beta/1
Win
Hi Gerd,
on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:28:57 +0200 GMT (which was 31.03.2001, 09:28
+0100 GMT where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote:
> Ok, now let's try the standard version PGP 6.5.8ckt
This is good:
*** PGP Signature Status: good
*** Signer: Gerd Ewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*** Signer Key ID: 0xD56C61
Hi David,
on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:25:10 +0100 GMT (which was 30.03.2001, 18:25
+0100 GMT where I live) David Elliott wrote:
> Correct, but this one will be good. -=#;-]
Yu are right! :-))
--
Best regards,
Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45
I use The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk Haasis !
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:54:36 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 30.03.2001, 20:54 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
> But another thing: How come your signature comes out bad?
Thanks for telling me this. I usually don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerd!
On Friday, March 30, 2001 at 6:19:21 PM you wrote:
> Obviously you never used PGP, so you don't know that you don't have to
> download the pub key *each* time you verify a message. You can import
> them into your keyring and check the re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, March 30, 2001 at 6:12:08 PM you wrote:
> And others. Was I so obvious, and this thread is already finished? ;-)
Für uns alte Hasen :-). (Sorry for using German. Just saying it was
obvious for us "older" folks.
- --
Dierk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Thomas !
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 22:22:42 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was 30.03.2001, 16:22 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
DH>> BTW, I really am verifying messages from this list.
> Wow! Are you on a flat rate, or have you taken the time t
Hallo Dierk,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:04:08 +0200 GMT (30/03/2001, 23:04 +0800 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH> Are we through with rehashing for the sake of new members like
DH> Norbert? ;-)
And others. Was I so obvious, and this thread is already finished? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der
Hi David,
on Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:59:05 +0100 GMT (which was 30.03.2001, 15:59
+0100 GMT where I live) David Elliott wrote:
> Verify this one ;?
> PS I liked the last quote.
*** PGP Signature Status: bad
*** Signer: David Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*** Signer Key ID: 0x650F4534
*** Sign
501 - 600 of 858 matches
Mail list logo
