Hello Stefan,
Saturday, July 4, 2020, 9:24:49 PM, you wrote:
> Use Ctrl+Shift+ Plus to expand all threads and Ctrl+Shift+Minus to
> collapse all threads, Asterisk toggles the expanded state of all threads.
Thanks, this works. It also collapses date-based threading though,
perhaps the
Hello Andrew,
Saturday, July 4, 2020, 6:01:18 AM, you wrote:
> Surely there is a button to collapse all threads... Somewhere. I have
> used "menu navigator", but so far was unable to find one. Any hints?
Use Ctrl+Shift+ Plus to expand all threads and Ctrl+Shift+Minus to colla
Hi
On Saturday 4 July 2020 at 4:01:18 AM, in
, Andrew Savchenko wrote:-
> Surely there is a button to collapse all threads...
> Somewhere. I have
> used "menu navigator", but so far was unable to find
> one. Any hints?
I don't know about a button but the keyboard
7/4/2020 6:51 AM
Hi Andrew,
On 7/3/2020 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
AS> Hello,
AS> Surely there is a button to collapse all threads... Somewhere. I have
AS> used "menu navigator", but so far was unable to find one. Any hints?
Help > Menu Navigator
- --
Paul
The Bat! v.
Hello,
Surely there is a button to collapse all threads... Somewhere. I have
used "menu navigator", but so far was unable to find one. Any hints?
--
v9.1.18.3 (BETA) x64 on Windows 10 18363
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'U
Hello Tom, you wrote:
> is this what you are looking for?
> https://www.ritlabs.com/en/support/tips-and-tricks/3831/
Thanks! That pointed me in the right direction!
Workspace/toolbars/customize/[shortcuts tab] looks like what I was trying to
find. When I have a chance to look around in those
Saturday, May 23, 2020, 5:03:44 AM, you wrote:
> Is the compete list available somewhere for download/installation?
Hi,
is this what you are looking for?
https://www.ritlabs.com/en/support/tips-and-tricks/3831/
--
Tom
using TheBat! 8.8.9 on XP
Hello Stuart, you wrote:
> Options/Preferences/Other Options/System Hotkeys. It shows you the options
> that are set and lets you add options.
That's the first place I looked, but there are only nine (9) listed. In the
past there were dozens listed, organized by several categories.
Is the
Hello Melissa,
On Thu, 21 May 2020 14:00:34 -0800 GMT (22-May-20, 5:00 +0700 GMT),
Melissa Reese wrote:
> In any event, I'd at least appreciate being reminded of the hotkey
> combinations for expanding and collapsing individual threads. Any help here,
> and for finding the list of all
Hello Melissa,
Thursday, May 21, 2020, 5:00:34 PM, you wrote:
> In any event, I'd at least appreciate being reminded of the hotkey
> combinations for expanding and collapsing individual threads. Any help here,
> and for finding the list of all other key combinations would be
Hello,
It's been a while, and I've forgotten many of the hotkey combinations I used
to use for various functions while reading mail and following discussion
threads.
Ever since clicking on "Help" sends us to a website instead of opening up
"in-program" help files, I've fo
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 at 22:52:29 +,Robert wrote:
1) Shift+Ctrl+Plus behaves identically with Shift+Ctrl+*, i.e.,
expands *all* threads, not just the one under the cursor.
Confirmed on my system
2) None of Shift+Space, Ctrl+Space or Alt+Space work. All invoke
the standard Windows Alt+Space
Help says, under topic Threading:
To expand all threads in a folder message list press Shift+Ctrl+*.
To expand / collapse all branches of the current thread, use
Shift+Ctrl+Plus/Minus. To expand and collapse threads use
Plus/Minus and to toggle threads explanded or collapsed you can use
Shift
no new threads either byCreated nor an actual
new message in the line.
But, in the thread, if I select Move to Next Unread, I land on the new
message and it is visible to me.
Note, this is not ALWAYS the case.
For example, tight here in TBUDL, there is a reply to the Scary message
thread. Upon
Hi
On Monday 10 August 2009 at 2:45:09 PM, in
mid:335273040.20090810154...@tiscali.nl, Jos Klaassens wrote:
Hello MFPA,
Monday, August 10, 2009, 1:57:48 AM, you wrote:
M ctrl+- collapses the currently focussed thread
M from the currently selected message downwards.
For some reason it is
Guten Tag MFPA,
am Montag, 10. August 2009 um 01:57 schrieben Sie:
Here, ctrl+* collapses or expands all threads.
ctrl+- collapses the currently focussed thread from the currently
selected message downwards.
ctrl+- expands the currently selected thread.
Ok, thank you, i will try again
Hello MFPA,
Monday, August 10, 2009, 1:57:48 AM, you wrote:
M ctrl+- collapses the currently focussed thread from the currently
M selected message downwards.
For some reason it is different here: ctrl+shift+-
M ctrl+- expands the currently selected thread.
And: ctrl+shift++
--
Best regards,
Hello Jos,
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:45:09 +0200 GMT (10/Aug/09, 20:45 PM +0700 GMT),
Jos Klaassens wrote:
M ctrl+- collapses the currently focussed thread from the currently
M selected message downwards.
JK For some reason it is different here: ctrl+shift+-
M ctrl+- expands the currently
JK For some reason it is different here
Hmm, except for the + to expand I see now that there is no difference :)
because Shift is needed anyway for - and +..
--
Best regards,
Jos
Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 10, 2009, 4:48:31 PM, you wrote:
TF Both work here, i.e. there is no difference whether I also hold down
TF the shift key or not.
I envy you :) Shift key is really needed here, otherwise nothing happens..
--
Best regards,
Jos
Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1 on
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 10, 2009, 4:48:31 PM, you wrote:
TF Both work here, i.e. there is no difference whether I also hold down
TF the shift key or not.
Now I understand! Num Lock + and - without Shift. I never use Num Lock
because it is too far to the right side :)
--
Best regards,
Guten Tag Tbudl,
is there any way to expand or collaps a whole Thread in Thread View?
Because i always search for the new arrising messages and the Parent
Mails are marked bold too...
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Hi Jens,
on Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:35:12 +0200GMT (09.08.2009, 20:35 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
JF is there any way to expand or collaps a whole Thread in Thread View?
JF Because i always search for the new arrising messages and the Parent
JF Mails are marked bold too...
ctrl+* should do the
not matter.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Threads expand or collapsThe Bat! 4.2.9.6 (BETA) + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.1 +
Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2
Language-File-Checksum: F49817DD
Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM
Debian
you, this is expanding and the most important to
me. Did not find it working for collaps, but that does
not matter.
Here, ctrl+* collapses or expands all threads.
ctrl+- collapses the currently focussed thread from the currently
selected message downwards.
ctrl+- expands the currently selected
expand all threads and for
M the unread tab, leave it there. (Probably not what you want because
M it then only shows the unread messages in a thread rather than showing
M whole threads that contain unread messages)
M Or maybe leave all expanded but sort by Unread Messages - then all
M threads
Fellow list members,
For a long time now I've put up with collapsed threads containing new
messages, requiring un-collapsing before the new messages can be read.
For unknown reasons, it's beginning to annoy me greatly.
Is there a way to have TB automatically open collapsed threads
whenever a new
Hi
On Thursday 12 February 2009 at 10:07:09 PM, in
mid:1616439802.20090212160...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
All thoughts and wild assumptions welcomed.
You could always use the tabs at the bottom of the message list. For
the all tab, maybe remove the tick from expand all threads
Hi
One of my folders has recently decided to display all threads
collapsed instead of expanded.
Pressing * (no quotes) expands/collapses all threads - with or
without Alt, Ctrl or space - but the next time I view that folder
the threads have collapsed again.
All other folders are behaving
Hi
On Thursday 8 February 2007 at 12:20:27 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote:
Hi
One of my folders has recently decided to display all threads
collapsed instead of expanded.
...
Can anybody suggest what's wrong and how to fix it?
Found it - right-click on one of the column
Batfolk,
I want to find, or set, shortcuts for expanding and collapsing
threads. In some earlier version of TB! I could expand or collapse all
threads, or just the email thread I am currently in. In the current
version SHIFT-8 (i.e. *), CTRL-8 and CTRL-SHIFT-8 (i.e. CTRL-*) will
all toggle
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 at 23:02:18 +0700, Thomas wrote:
I use crtl-], so moving from one message to the next will allow me to
view the responses in the order they were written in the subthreads.
This is very convenient, maybe you want to try crtl-] instead of
crtl-rightarrow.
What does ctrl-]
On Monday, October 2, 2006, 10:04:28 PM, Robin Anson wrote:
What does ctrl-] actually do? I tried looking for the shortcut in the
menus, but couldn't find it.
Next unread message either in Thread, Account or another account in
that order. You can view all your unread messages in turn by using
Hello Julian,
Tuesday, October 3, 2006, 5:48:23 AM, you wrote:
Next unread message either in Thread, Account or another account in
that order. You can view all your unread messages in turn by using
Ctrl-] - it is my favourite TB! keyboard shortcut!
On my laptop I get the same results with
Hi
On Monday 2 October 2006 at 5:02:18 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
I view messages threaded by reference, too. Sort by: Descending Order.
Where would I find a setting to Sort by: Descending Order, and
what does it mean?
M Unfortunately, when there are multiple
Hello Julian Beach (Lists) everyone else,
on 03-Okt-2006 at 14:48 you (Julian Beach (Lists)) wrote:
What does ctrl-] actually do?
Next unread message either in Thread, Account or another account in
that order. You can view all your unread messages in turn by using
Ctrl-] - it is my
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 at 21:58:28 +0200, Alexander wrote:
Next unread message either in Thread, Account or another account in
that order. You can view all your unread messages in turn by using
Ctrl-] - it is my favourite TB! keyboard shortcut!
If you configure TB to search new messages across
Hello MFPA,
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:10:11 +0100 GMT (04/10/2006, 01:10 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
I view messages threaded by reference, too. Sort by: Descending Order.
M Where would I find a setting to Sort by: Descending Order,
I'm in the Folder View pane.
View / Sort by / Descending Ctrl-0
M
Hi
I view messages threaded by reference, with the newest thread at
the top of the list. Unfortunately, when there are multiple
replies to the same message, the replies are also listed newest
first, so that moving from one message to the next does not take
me through the thread in the order it
Hello MFPA,
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:37:31 +0100 GMT (02/10/2006, 22:37 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M I view messages threaded by reference, with the newest thread at
M the top of the list.
I view messages threaded by reference, too. Sort by: Descending Order.
M Unfortunately, when there are multiple
Hello Thomas,
on Monday, October 2, 2006 you wrote
I use crtl-], so moving from one message to the next will allow me to
view the responses in the order they were written in the subthreads.
This is very convenient, maybe you want to try crtl-] instead of
crtl-rightarrow.
I would like to
Hello MFPA,
I view messages threaded by reference, with the newest thread at
the top of the list. Unfortunately, when there are multiple
replies to the same message, the replies are also listed newest
first, so that moving from one message to the next does not take
me through the thread in
Hello Uwe,
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:35:30 +0200 GMT (02/10/2006, 23:35 +0700 GMT),
Uwe Steinfeld wrote:
This is very convenient, maybe you want to try crtl-] instead of
crtl-rightarrow.
US I would like to try that, too. But I get no response from ctrl-] using a
US German keyboard layout. Do you
Alexander,
Monday, September 25, 2006, 4:18:50 PM, you wrote:
Sometimes, I truly believe that a thing can be TOO configurable...
ASK ...and I surely wouldn't want to NOT have this feature. :-)
I wasn't saying that any particular config option should be
removed. Instead I intended to express
Roelof,
Wednesday, September 20, 2006, 8:15:45 AM, you wrote:
SPV I'd like to view some folder message lists threaded
SPV and others NOT threaded.
RO Create folder view modes according to your wishes and assign them to
RO your folders as your preferences go.
I'll see if I can figure out enough
Hello Steven P Vallière everyone else,
on 25-Sep-2006 at 21:09 you (Steven P Vallière) wrote:
I'll see if I can figure out enough of the view mode stuff to make it
work. It certainly is NOT intuitively obvious... smile
It took me a while to get the grip of the viewmodes. You should define a
I'd like to view some folder message lists threaded
and others NOT threaded. In fact, I have FOUR folders
whose messages lists are ALWAYS threaded. But all of
the other folders seems to use the last threading option
I've chosen. I've looked at the folder properties and
not found any threading
Hallo Steven,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:08:56 -0400GMT (20-9-2006, 14:08 , where I
live), you wrote:
SPV I'd like to view some folder message lists threaded
SPV and others NOT threaded.
Create folder view modes according to your wishes and assign them to
your folders as your preferences go.
--
On Wednesday, September 20, 2006, at 7:08:56 AM, Steven P Vallière wrote:
If this is possible, where is it hidden?
I'm doing exactly what you want. However I'm not using the properties to
set up the views. I have the global view set to no view selected, and
then for each folder that I want to
Hello all,
There is an old (3 year old) standing wish in BT to implement an 'Ignore
Thread' function:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1542
Years ago I used PowerPro to implement a workaround and later used some
other methods. I have just added a note to this BT wish explaining how I
do
Hello list,
Is there any way to use the watch feature without having a mail-chat
window popping up everytime a new mail in that thread arrives? I know
the chat folders are used by both thread-watching and mail-chat but no
chat setting seems to have any effect on thread-watching. Why does
Hallo Chris,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:09:18 -0400GMT (25-7-2005, 3:09 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C I have a filter set to place replies to certain messages in the same
C folder as the parent message (the one to which I am replying).
I've got something like for several of my folders.
C
Roelof Otten @ 2005-Jul-25 5:01:33 AM
Threads not updated in real-time? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, I thread by references and sort by descending created time
(newest on top).
So do I. The folder I was checking doesn't use a viewmode, maybe
that makes a difference?
But I do use a view mode
I have a filter set to place replies to certain messages in the same
folder as the parent message (the one to which I am replying).
However, I have noticed that if I remain in the same folder and queue
the message in the Outbox and then send the message or send the
message immediately, when the
Hello,
Is it possible to sort threads by TO: ADDRESS and NOT TO: NAME?
Anyway to hack such a feature? Any work-around just in case?
--
Best regards,
Victor B. Gonzalez
Using The Bat! v3.5.25
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hæ!
Is it possible to apply a colour to the subject line when threading by
subject?
It would be nice, if I could get rid of the subject line completely
and thread the messages like the old behaviour of View Threads by
Subject... :-(
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat
Hello tbudl,
I can't remember or find the keystroke to expand all messages in the
threads, anyone recall this?
--
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Watcher aka Bill DeVos
On Sunday, December 26, 2004 at 1:54:01 PM [GMT -0500], Watcher wrote:
I can't remember or find the keystroke to expand all messages in the
threads, anyone recall this?
CTRLnum*
--
Cheers,
-= Allie =-
. I have enough trouble single-tasking!
«·»
IMAP Client
Hi Watcher,
on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:54:01 -0500GMT, you wrote:
W I can't remember or find the keystroke to expand all messages in the
W threads, anyone recall this?
ctrl+numpad*
--
Cheers
Peter
Famous last words - Don't worry, I can handle it.
Winamp currently playing: Pink Floyd
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, at 20:00:18 [GMT +0100] (3:33 PM here) you wrote:
ctrl+numpad*
I've been searching for that forever, sheesh
--
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Watcher aka Bill DeVos
the current message down)
and
also one to collapse a thread (again, ctrl- only works from the level of the
currently marked message). Also a hotkey to collapse ALL threads as an opposite
to
ctrl* would be very useful.
--
Regards,
Peter
Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.2.10 (OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600
of the
currently marked message). Also a hotkey to
collapse ALL threads as an opposite to
ctrl* would be very useful.
To collapse all, use
shiftctrl*
The other two requests, AFAIK, aren't implemented. Of
course you could do the following:
Expand single thread while inside:
shiftctrl
Hæ!
Is it possible to set up a filter which colours a thread where oneself
did take part?
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.1.33
| PopFile v0.22.0
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
+-+
| Get Firefox -
Hello Thorvald,
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TN Is it possible to set up a filter which colours a thread where oneself
TN did take part?
I would certainly like to see that facility too.
I'm sure that, in previous versions of TB! pre 3, the little arrow on
the envelope
Hello Thorvald,
Thursday, October 14, 2004, 1:05:30 AM, you wrote:
TN Hæ!
TN Is it possible to set up a filter which colours a thread where oneself
TN did take part?
In a previous discussion MAU had created a filter that would do this,
to a degree. It also only works depending on your e-mail
Hello Stuart,
In a previous discussion MAU had created a filter that would do this,
to a degree. It also only works depending on your e-mail address.
Right. In my case it works because I have my own domain rancho-k.com
and there is no possible confusion.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech
Hi,
I use a thread view for displaying new mails in this group.
Unfortunately I haven't found a command or shortcut which allows me to
delete a complete thread instead of single mails. Have I overlooked
something ?
Thanks
--
Michael
TheBat! 3.0.0.18 on Windows 2000
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:09:35 +0200 GMT(26/09/2004, 15:09
+ GMT), Michael Mlinaric wrote:
MM I haven't found a command or shortcut which allows me
MM to delete a complete thread instead of single mails.
MM Have I overlooked something ?
Have you tried CtrlShiftDelete with any message
header
Hi Michael,
Have I overlooked something ?
Yes, you have :-) Right click and have a look at the context submenu
Threads...
--
Regards,
Raymund
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Eric,
on Sonntag, 26. September 2004 16:12 you wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:09:35 +0200 GMT(26/09/2004, 15:09
+ GMT), Michael Mlinaric wrote:
MM I haven't found a command or shortcut which allows me
MM to delete a complete thread instead of single mails.
MM Have I overlooked something ?
Hi MAU,
I think it would be rather difficult, if at all possible.
Well, then I should call it a feature request :-)
--
Regards,
Raymund
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Raymund wrote [13.09.04]:
I just thought about an VF that shows all threads which contains an
unread message. I think that should be possible but can't see how to
achieve that. Any ideas?
(1) Create a new Virtual Folder, its properties will open.
(2) On label filter check Auto Refresh
Hello Annette,
(4) That's it.
Nope. He wants to see _threads_ that include one or more unread
messages.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hi TBUDL,
I just thought about an VF that shows all threads which contains an
unread message. I think that should be possible but can't see how to
achieve that. Any ideas?
--
Thanks in advance,
Raymund
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL
Hello Raymund,
I just thought about an VF that shows all threads which contains an
unread message. I think that should be possible but can't see how to
achieve that. Any ideas?
I think it would be rather difficult, if at all possible.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain
of the thread.
QS I'm fairly certain others have commented about this in the past, but
QS I've never heard whether that's the way it's supposed to be or not. Do
QS you know?
I don't think so. Over here, it expands all threads.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Bilanz der Freiwilligen Feuerwehr: 121 Mitglieder und
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 9:26:17 AM, you wrote:
I don't think so. Over here, it expands all threads.
I am confused.
Does this expand all threads in a folder (which was the subject) or
just all messages in a thread?
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 2.12.00
under Windows XP
Hi Terry,
on Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:28:12 -0700GMT, you wrote:
I don't think so. Over here, it expands all threads.
TGM I am confused.
TGM Does this expand all threads in a folder (which was the subject) or
TGM just all messages in a thread?
ctrl+(num)* expands all threads, whereas ctrl+(num
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 11:23:05 AM, you wrote:
ctrl+(num)* expands all threads, whereas ctrl+(num)+ expands
the particular thread.
Do you know how to get this to work (expand all threads) on a laptop
computer.
I use [Ctrl][Shft][+] to expand a thread.
--
Thanks,
Terry
ctrl+(num)* expands all threads, whereas ctrl+(num)+ expands
the particular thread.
My TB! requires only + or - on the NumPad without Ctrl to expand/collapse the current
thread below the selected mail.
* on the numpad expands/collapses all the threads in the folder.
--
Gabor
Hello Kovcs,
Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 12:34:55 PM, you wrote:
My TB! requires only + or - on the NumPad without Ctrl to
expand/collapse the current thread below the selected mail. * on the
numpad expands/collapses all the threads in the folder.
Again I am using a laptop (no NumPad
Terry,
Again I am using a laptop (no NumPad) but when I hit [shift] [+] some
of the time the threat will expand completely other times the thread
will only expand to the first level. If I hit the - key the threat
will collapse.
Usually On laptops there is a special button (Num). Pushing this
Hello Kovcs,
Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 1:26:26 PM, you wrote:
Usually On laptops there is a special button (Num). Pushing this and
some of the keys on the right side of the keyboard it fuctions like
a keypad.
Yes I have that ability on my laptop...but there is no + on the NumPad
and
On Thu 26 August 2004, 5:03:11 +1000, Terry G. Munson wrote:
Do you know how to get this to work (expand all threads) on a laptop
computer.
I use [Ctrl][Shft][+] to expand a thread.
The trick on the laptop is using the right key combination to get the *
on the numeric keypad as opposed
Hello Thomas,
Friday, July 30, 2004, 7:52:14 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello Dan,
TF On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:33:07 -0400 GMT (30/07/2004, 20:33 +0700 GMT),
TF Dan Grunberg wrote:
DG I can't seem to use |Shift| + |Ctrl| + |*| to expand all threads in a
DG list of messages. TB's Help says it should work
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:52:14 +0700 (9:52 AM EDT here) Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hello Dan,
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:33:07 -0400 GMT (30/07/2004, 20:33 +0700
GMT), Dan Grunberg wrote:
I use crtl-* (no shift) and it works. |SNIP|
Thank you. I guess I WAS missing something. (:)
Using: The Bat!
I can't seem to use |Shift| + |Ctrl| + |*| to expand all threads in a
list of messages. TB's Help says it should work, but it doesn't.
Am I missing something?
Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.5, MyMacros 1.10
Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4
--
Daniel
Hello Dan,
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:33:07 -0400 GMT (30/07/2004, 20:33 +0700 GMT),
Dan Grunberg wrote:
DG I can't seem to use |Shift| + |Ctrl| + |*| to expand all threads in a
DG list of messages. TB's Help says it should work, but it doesn't.
I use crtl-* (no shift) and it works. You have to use
Hi Thomas,
On 7/30/2004 6:52 AM my time, Thomas wrote:
TF I use crtl-* (no shift) and it works. You have to use the asterisk on
TF the numpad, not the one above the 8.
Thats what was giving me problems also. I had no Idea I had to use the
number pad for that.
Thanks :thumbup:
--
Darrin
WinXP
Saturday, July 24, 2004, 12:06:11 AM, Allie wrote:
AM Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote:
Oops! Sorry. Looks like a template to fix!
AM Bitten by the To: macro? :)
AM It's a lot better to create templates for the lists using address book
AM templates. Give the list address book entries simple names
Hello TBOTers,
I know this isn't TBUDL, but it seems that threads are changing spots
rather often.
Specifically, my Strange Ills for XP thread is now discussing at least
three topics (yes, ok, I started one of them maybe).
Also the Proposed TB! Help thread Mary moved here has gone the same
way
Hallo Allister,
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:21:32 +1200GMT (23-7-2004, 9:21 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AJ Hello TBOTers,
AJ I know this isn't TBUDL, but it seems that threads are changing spots
AJ rather often.
Per chance something like a folder template? Because this *is* TBUDL
Friday, July 23, 2004, 7:21:32 PM, Allister wrote:
AJ Hello TBOTers...
Oops! Sorry. Looks like a template to fix!
:confused:
--
Cheers,
Allister
Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote:
Oops! Sorry. Looks like a template to fix!
Bitten by the To: macro? :)
It's a lot better to create templates for the lists using address book
templates. Give the list address book entries simple names so that
creating new messages isn't such a hassle.
For
Hi All,
Can someone explain to me how to collapse all threads in a message
list. I know that Shift+Ctrl+* expands all threads but what's the
reverse?
--
Regards
John Cunnane
Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 4
Hi John,
on Thu, 27 May 2004 12:53:37 +0100GMT, you wrote:
JC Can someone explain to me how to collapse all threads in a message
JC list. I know that Shift+Ctrl+* expands all threads but what's the
JC reverse?
That's odd. Your shortcut works for collapsing all threads here. For
expanding
Hi Peter,
PM That's odd. Your shortcut works for collapsing all threads here. For
PM expanding it is ctrl+num*...
Don't know why it went weird. My keyboard response became very strange
and a re-boot has fixed it. All works fine now and the shortcuts work
as you say. Thanks for the help
Hello,
2.02. CE, view threads by references, fine, view threads by subject,
no headers, just the '+' boxes.
Doug
--
Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Doug and Helen's Dogs: http
On Sunday, September 28, 2003 at 02:24 (which was Sunday, September
28, 2003 at 9:24 where I am) Ken Green [KG] wrote:
KG It appears that there may have been something to the use account
KG default settings but I'm not sure.
It does.
For folders that do _not_ have the 'Use the account default
Hallo ken,
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:49:24 -0500GMT (28-9-03, 6:49 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
kg I posted about the 'view threads by' setting being account-specific.
kg Someone replied stating that the thread view is folders-specific.
As he should, since it's a folder specific setting, both
1 - 100 of 514 matches
Mail list logo
