Hello tbudl,
I can't figure out why The Bat no longer is downloading message bodies
for my IMAP account. I am not sure if this started happening when I
upgraded from Home to Pro (not sure). (...although it worked fine...I
think...when I tried Voyager...)
In 'IMAP Fine Tune', I have 'retrieve
is that I don't seem to be able to find the spot to change the
setting.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.70.06 Qigong (Beta) on Windows XP version 5,1
On 2/2/2006 at 6:07:38 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin wrote:
I am trying to send 4 rather large files. I discovered that this is
being greatly slowed because after the whole message gets sent to the
sender, it is getting sent again, to put it in the remote sent folder.
Usually I like my mail
and used before I switched from
a local to remote sent mail in the first place.
Thanks.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.70.06 Qigong (Beta) on Windows XP version 5,1
On 2/2/2006 at 7:04:17 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin wrote:
I looked thru whole thing multiple times, and finally decided that
must be the spot. I unchecked the box I think you mean, then got
interrupted so wasn't around to watch the connection centre and see if
the new sent folder it make
Hi,
[snip]
Thanks for the tipps; I have set up my account with your settings and
additionally I updated my TB to the new 3.70.06 Beta Version. So far the
crashes are gone...
I noticed also that with the new version not all folders are updated every time
I recieve mail but only the ones which
to restart that too in order to work again. (I am shure there is a timeout
when the lost connection gets freed, but I dont have that kind of time to wait)
- I get crashes nearly reproducable when TB syncs with the IMAP server and I
try to read/move newly recieved mails
- The mail counting gets on my
On 25/1/2006 at 6:44:03 AM [GMT -0500], Michael Wagner wrote:
I am using TB 3.65.03 and having massive problems:
Though I'm using a beta, I do recall using the version you're using and
my problems then, weren't massive. For IMAP, this isn't at all unusual.
User experience seems to vary quite
On Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 12:44:03, Michael Wagner wrote:
- I have often but not surely reproducable access violations in TB
This was fixed in the latest beta, I was experiencing the same problem for a
long time.
- Sometimes (about once per day) TB hangs and must be sut down via te
Hi all,
After working round the fact that I added two of these issues as private, I'd
appreciate any confirmations on the new, now public, issues:
Duplicate entries when downloading new headers -
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5532
AV when creating IMAP account -
https
Hi all,
On Wednesday, December 28, 2005, 10:32:12 AM, you wrote:
PM Yes, although I didn't realise that you could do this. I can't
PM see any way of changing this back to public though. Is this possible?
Does anyone know whether it is possible in BT to change a bug report from
private to
Paul...
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:51:12 +, you wrote:
Hi all,
On Wednesday, December 28, 2005, 10:32:12 AM, you wrote:
PM Yes, although I didn't realise that you could do this. I can't
PM see any way of changing this back to public though. Is this possible?
Does anyone know whether it is
Hello Paul,
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:51:12 + GMT (29/12/2005, 16:51 +0700 GMT),
Paul Meathrel wrote:
PM Does anyone know whether it is possible in BT to change a bug report from
private to public?
I don't know the answer, but if you don't get a satisfactory reply,
I'd suggest to just create
Hi Thomas,
On Thursday, December 29, 2005, 4:38:26 PM, you wrote:
TF I'd suggest to just create a new BT entry.
I've re-added the two private issues as public ones and added a note to each
indicating that it is now a duplicate. Thanks for the advice.
--
Warmest regards,
Paul
Created using
Hi all,
I've been playing around with IMAP a bit to see if I can get it to work
correctly with an Exchange server. Suffice it to say that I've given up on the
current released build. However I'd still appreciate any confirmations of the
three issues I've reported to BT:
Send and receive after
Hello all,
Wednesday, December 28, 2005, Paul Meathrel wrote:
I've been playing around with IMAP a bit to see if I can get it to
work correctly with an Exchange server. Suffice it to say that I've
given up on the current released build. However I'd still appreciate
any confirmations
Hi Marek,
On Wednesday, December 28, 2005, 10:28:47 AM, you wrote:
MM reports 5500 and 5501 are not accessible, so nobody can confirm them.
MM Did You set them to Private?
Yes, although I didn't realise that you could do this. I can't see any way of
changing this back to public though. Is
Greetings, 09:45, Thursday, December 22,
2005
I recently moved from a POP to an IMAP mail server. The setup seemed to go
fairly easy, but my incoming mail filters now behave strangely on the IMAP
account. Sometimes they don't run and I must run then manually
Hello Gary,
Thursday, December 22, 2005, 9:10:09 AM, you wrote:
GL I recently moved from a POP to an IMAP mail server. The setup seemed to go
GL fairly easy, but my incoming mail filters now behave strangely on the IMAP
GL account. Sometimes they don't run and I must run then manually
to be archived. As the
shutdown occurred a list of all those folders scrolled thru. That may
have taken about 10 seconds. When it got to the IMAP part it was
virtually done and gone.
I do not use IMAP but with 5 POP accounts and several common
folders TB! usually closes within 15-20 seconds.
--
Best
number
of common folders where old mail continues to be archived. As the
shutdown occurred a list of all those folders scrolled thru. That may
have taken about 10 seconds. When it got to the IMAP part it was
virtually done and gone.
I do not use IMAP but with 5 POP accounts and several common
Hello Clive...
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 07:11:32 +, you wrote:
Hello steverio,
Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 11:28:26 PM, you wrote:
It takes 4 seconds to close TB! when I use IMAP. It takes a split
second to close with POP3.
I have just responded to your other message. Some of us have
On Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 5:28:26 PM, steverio wrote:
It takes 4 seconds to close TB! when I use IMAP. It takes a split
second to close with POP3.
Log says the IMAP session is finished before I close TB! down.
*Question to IMAP users*
How long does it take for you to close TB
of all those folders scrolled thru. That may
have taken about 10 seconds. When it got to the IMAP part it was
virtually done and gone.
With new perspectives here I should probably not query too loud of my
measly 4 second delay on closing with IMAP! :)
I've trimmed down on pack ratting mail
Hello All...
I have added an IMAP account with fastmail. I haven't had an IMAP
account before and need some advice. I have both a POP3 and IMAP
account in TB!. Since adding the IMAP, I noticed a longer delay in TB!
closing. Checking my IMAP account for mail at some point will result
in a 4 second
A simple retake of my previous post that had no comments.
It takes 4 seconds to close TB! when I use IMAP. It takes a split
second to close with POP3.
Log says the IMAP session is finished before I close TB! down.
*Question to IMAP users*
How long does it take for you to close TB! with IMAP
Hello steverio2k,
Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 3:21:42 PM, you wrote:
Since adding the IMAP, I noticed a longer delay in TB! closing.
Checking my IMAP account for mail at some point will result in a 4
second closure interval for TB!.
I have this too. TB takes up to 10 seconds to close
Hello steverio,
Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 11:28:26 PM, you wrote:
It takes 4 seconds to close TB! when I use IMAP. It takes a split
second to close with POP3.
I have just responded to your other message. Some of us have to sleep
you know :).
This happens here but it's probably one
was trialling IMAP on caught an email virus within hours; I
guess because AVG couldn't cope with IMAP?
--
Best regards
Barry
Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi all
After a brief flirtation with Thunderbird I've come back to TB!
I particularly didn't like the fact that AVG couldn't scan any of my
incoming mail. I assume that because of TB's plugin it does?
Can anyone tell me if Bayesit works with an IMAP connection? And, if so,
where is the Junk
10 November 2005 - 13:42
Hello Barry,
Thursday, November 10, 2005, 9:52:47 AM, you wrote:
B I particularly didn't like the fact that AVG couldn't scan any of my
B incoming mail.
Surely a failure of AVG not Tbird?
--
Best regards,
William
Flying with The Bat! Professional
version 3.60.07
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:43:15 +, The Janitor wrote:
Surely a failure of AVG not Tbird?
Well, yes, but there is a plugin for TB and as I wasn't aware of an AV
program that actually worked with Thunderbird and IMAP so I decided to go
back to a program that does. (I hope!)
It seems
10 November 2005 - 20:08
Hello Barry,
Thursday, November 10, 2005, 2:53:34 PM, you wrote:
B It seems that there are plenty of AV programs that will work easily with
B POP email, but IMAP seems less well supported.
NOD32, www.eset.com.
--
Best regards,
William
Flying with The Bat
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:08:14 -0600, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
it can collect things from lots of folders, based upon specific
criteria, but it is virtual, it only links to the actual messages,
it doesn't recreate them in its own confines.
Thanks Dwight, now I've grasped that feature.
IMAP seems
than I have!
For me, this is one of the great benefits of IMAP, the other being that
I can access identical mail structures from wherever I happen to be
without a lot of fiddly synchronisation every day.
--
Regards
Clive Taylor
Current version
--On Sunday, November 06, 2005 05:59 PM + Clive Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me, this is one of the great benefits of IMAP, the other being
that I can access identical mail structures from wherever I happen to
be without a lot of fiddly synchronisation every day.
Additionally
Additionally, there's nothing preventing you from using filters or
manually copying your messages to local folders. There's your backup.
True. I do archive some of my FastMail folders every few months and
store them on CD.
--
Regards
Clive Taylor
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:30:01 -0500, Curtis wrote:
For me, this is one of the great benefits of IMAP, the other being
that I can access identical mail structures from wherever I happen
to be without a lot of fiddly synchronisation every day.
Additionally, there's nothing preventing you from
I assume that I can have different folders on the server for day to
day filtering? And then selectively pull down emails that I feel need
to be on the local machine.
You can (should be able to) set up a folder structure on your server
much as you can with a POP account, depending on the
Hi
OK I'm a complete newbie to IMAP, sorry.
I've grasped the concept of all messages being located on the remote
server, in my case my ISP, and I've made the connection and seen it
work. Very cool to see a new message immediately appear in the Inbox.
So, if I want to keep a message on the local
On Saturday, November 5, 2005, 7:01:29 AM, BJH wrote:
But, do I create the local folder as part of the IMAP account or do
I create a 'Common Folder' or a 'Virtual Folder'.
If you create a folder in you IMAP account, it won't be local. You
need a common folder. That will reside on your local
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:08:36 -0600, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
On Saturday, November 5, 2005, 7:01:29 AM, BJH wrote:
But, do I create the local folder as part of the IMAP account or do
I create a 'Common Folder' or a 'Virtual Folder'.
If you create a folder in you IMAP account, it won't
A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.62.12 on Windows XP version 5,1
Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Clive Taylor wrote:
How do I need to do to get the messages in the Inbox to display?
Update to the latest version of TB. IMAP has come a long way since v2
and is quite usable now.
It still has some weird issues that I have yet to fully classify, but
in general I would agree that it's usable
On Friday, September 09, 2005 at 1:43:20 AM [GMT -0500], Tom Plunket
wrote:
One that I see now is that, despite the mark messages as read when
deleted, when I do that from my IMAP inbox, well, it copies the
message to the Trash, and leaves it in my inbox as well. Both copies
are marked
Hello Tom,
Friday, September 9, 2005, 7:43:20 AM, you wrote:
One that I see now is that, despite the mark messages as read when
deleted, when I do that from my IMAP inbox, well, it copies the
message to the Trash, and leaves it in my inbox as well.
This is my number one issue with TB
I have one Account that only works in IMAP for retrieving mail. When I
press F2 to retrieve mail, I think it downloaded the mail. The Account
List pane shows 2 unread (bold) for the Inbox. But when I put my cursor
on the Inbox, the messages do not get listed in the Message List pane
Hello z5worg,
Friday, September 9, 2005, 5:37:09 AM, you wrote:
How do I need to do to get the messages in the Inbox to display?
Update to the latest version of TB. IMAP has come a long way since v2
and is quite usable now.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.60.07
Windows XP: Service Pack 2
Another idea is to let deleted messages in the inbox but do not
display them after they are marked for deletion.
The conventional IMAP method is to strike them through with a red line,
though they remain visible. However, deleting them from visibility could
also be done.
I like when
On Friday, September 02, 2005 at 5:21:01 AM [GMT -0500], Bodemann, Jörn
wrote:
How can I dow that? I did not find a way to identify deleted messages
in the filter to make the invisible.
I was just proposing how things could be made to work and not how they
work, so currently, you can't have a
On Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 11:54:18 AM [GMT -0500], Bodemann, Jörn
wrote:
what do I have to do to get messages moved to the trash folder while I
am offline from my IMAP server? Now they remain in the Inbox and get
deleted after I reconnect.
Yes. This is a problem.
I use the IMAP trash
Hello List,
what do I have to do to get messages moved to the trash folder while I
am offline from my IMAP server? Now they remain in the Inbox and get
deleted after I reconnect. I use the IMAP trash folder which is not
reachable while offline. Is it an idea to use a local trashfolder and
copy
Hello List,
I use a filter to color messages. The filter seems to be applied only
after the messages is read by me. Can messages be filterd / colored
before I read them?
I use IMAP. Auto-filtering is enabled.
--
Regards, Jörn Bodemann
an incoming filter or a read filter?
BJ I use IMAP. Auto-filtering is enabled.
I've got little experience with IMAP and none at all with
auto-filtering on IMAP.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Devoted to the art of cat-bathing as a martial art.
The Bat! 3.60.05 Forerunner (Beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Hello Jörn,
A reminder of what Bodemann, Jörn typed on:
Tuesday, August 30, 2005 at 18:40:48 GMT +0200
BJ I use a filter to color messages. The filter seems to be applied only
BJ after the messages is read by me. Can messages be filterd / colored
BJ before I read them?
BJ I use IMAP. Auto
BJ I use a filter to color messages. The filter seems to be applied only
BJ after the messages is read by me. Can messages be filterd / colored
BJ before I read them?
Are you using an incoming filter or a read filter?
Incoming
Current version
Hallo Bodemann,
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:00:39 +0200GMT (30-8-2005, 19:00 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Are you using an incoming filter or a read filter?
BJ Incoming
BJ
BJ Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
moderator
On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 11:52:05 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
BJ I use a filter to color messages. The filter seems to be applied
BJ only after the messages is read by me. Can messages be filterd /
BJ colored before I read them?
Are you using an incoming filter or a read filter?
BJ I use IMAP
Problem solved.
BJ I use a filter to color messages. The filter seems to be applied only
BJ after the messages is read by me. Can messages be filterd / colored
BJ before I read them?
BJ I use IMAP. Auto-filtering is enabled.
If you have set up color groups, and I assume this is what you have
Hi all - I just accidentally deleted all the messages (several
thousand) in one of my IMAP folders. I haven't purged/compressed or
done anything else since then -- is there a quick way I can get them
back without having to restore from a backup?
--
Sean H.
using The Bat! 3.51.10 on Windows XP
in an IMAP folder. Lots of other useful functions, too,
including backup.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.51.9
Windows XP: Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hoi Sean
I just accidentally deleted all the messages (several thousand) in
one of my IMAP folders. I haven't purged/compressed or done anything else
since then -- is there a quick way I can get them back without having to
restore from a backup?
Try this:
1. Click on the folder from which
details and you'll find an right click option to undelete all
CT messages in an IMAP folder. Lots of other useful functions, too,
CT including backup.
Thanks Clive, that looks like a very handy program!
--
Sean H.
using The Bat! 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1
on Thursday, July 28, 2005, at 4:39 PM, Natasha V Pearce wrote:
is there a quick way I can get them back without having to restore
from a backup?
NVP Try this:
Thanks! That did the trick.
--
Sean H.
using The Bat! 3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1
changing folders at Account, Properties, IMAP fine
V tune.
Yes I see this now, however, I have my Trash set to use the IMAP
folder and Deletion set to use the Trash folder and yet when I view my
Trash folder in Fastmail there is nothing in there.
V Also, when Managing folders (right click
Hello Stuart,
SC Could someone advise as to whether I should be using the following
SC with IMAP in The Bat.
SC Account/Preferences/Mail Management
SC Root Folder _
SC For pre-defined folders use these IMAP mailboxes.
SC Outbox _
SC Sentmail
Hello Vili,
Friday, July 8, 2005, 7:19:47 AM, you wrote:
SC Could someone advise as to whether I should be using the following
SC with IMAP in The Bat.
SC Account/Preferences/Mail Management
SC Root Folder _
SC For pre-defined folders use these IMAP mailboxes.
SC
On Friday, July 08, 2005 at 8:25:09 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote:
V If you assign the Outbox, Sentmail and Trash to a server side mailbox
V (from the pulldown menu)
Where is this pull down menu?
Here:
http://www.ac-martin.com/pics/menu.png
I often see Allie talking about problems
Hello Allie,
A reminder of what Allie Martin typed on:
Friday, July 08, 2005 at 14:40:51 GMT -0500
Where is this pull down menu?
AM Here:
AM http://www.ac-martin.com/pics/menu.png
Thanks, that is what I was doing, just wasn't sure if it was right.
--
Best regards,
Stuart
, Mail management) yet, we
are working to fix that part, I think we are pretty close) and set
Compress when changing folders at Account, Properties, IMAP fine
tune.
Also, when Managing folders (right click on the account name) set the
Synchronization ON for all or your subscribed folders (I
Hello tbudl,
Could someone advise as to whether I should be using the following
with IMAP in The Bat.
Account/Preferences/Mail Management
Root Folder _
For pre-defined folders use these IMAP mailboxes.
Outbox _
Sentmail
(the number they should have had). At fastmail, the folder
has three messages.
I fiddled with 'manage IMAP folders' and have managed to get down to
one non-nested copy of the folder in the right place, although it has
only three messages, the other 19 disappeared. (They aren't really
very important, but I
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 4:56:18 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
In the process, however, I have grown these multiple copies of
several folders as demonstrated by the attachment. I am not sure
quite what to do to shorten up my list, get rid of the dupes etc. I
don't want to end up deleting all
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 4:56:18 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
I imagine there is also a bug here somewhere.
talking to myself again, I see that I foolishly chose the wrong place
to post, since I know good and well that attachments aren't allowed
here.
I will combine the info from my first two
PH Additionally you may want to check Compress all folders on exit in
Account
PH properties/Options.
I dont advise it.
I have many input from TB users. I have observed ONLY two ways to lose
mails:
1. Compress on exit checked in Inbox properties
2. Compress all folders on exit in
at all that does most damage,
especially when we're discussing the inbox.
However, we were discussing IMAP folders and I don't think that TB's
compressing routines really count as each IMAP server stores its stuff
differently, so I highly suspect that the server's compressing
routines are used
and start the whole routine
automatically. If I observe mail loss, I will do this on different
machines, maybe have some observation coming out of this experience.
RO However, we were discussing IMAP folders and I don't think that
RO TB's compressing routines really count as each IMAP server
Good evening TBUDL,
i use FastMail IMAP and The Bat! as my default email client. Now i have one
strange problem:
When i delete messages from my mail client, they are moved to trash and are
marked as deleted, when i log into the webinterface - but not really deleted.
Since they are marked
Hallo Ralph,
On Sat, 21 May 2005 21:17:18 +0200GMT (21-5-2005, 21:17 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RI When i delete messages from my mail client, they are moved to
RI trash and are marked as deleted, when i log into the webinterface
RI - but not really deleted. Since they are marked for
Roelof Otten wrote on Saturday, May 21, 2005 10:09:58 PM (964 Beats)
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try to purge and compress on leaving the folder.
How do i do this? Webinterface of FastMail or TB!?
--
Regards,
Ralph
Running The Bat! 3.5 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2
smime.p7s
Hello Ralph.
--On 21 May 2005 22:21 +0200 you wrote about Re: FastMail IMAP: How to
really delete messages?:
How do i do this? Webinterface of FastMail or TB!?
Highlight the folder in the folder tree with all the deleted messages and
press CTRL+C or set it up in your preferences to purge
Peter Hampf wrote on Saturday, May 21, 2005 10:27:47 PM (977 Beats)
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
TB: Account Properties/Mail Management/IMAP Fine-Tune
Check Compress folders when switching to another folder there.
Additionally you may want to check Compress all folders on exit in Account
Ralph,
On 17-05-2005 07:19, you [RI] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RI I used GMX IMAP before but always had a lot of messages with
RI identical bodies...
That bug should be fixed...
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.5 Pro /thebat version
Monday, May 16, 2005, Roman Katzer wrote:
is that even possible with their free accounts? I seem to remember
that only the paid accounts had IMAP enabled.
My german is as rusty as my klingon, but I think it's only available in
paid accounts.
Der IMAP4-Zugang ist in den Tarifen GMX ProMail und
Can someone explain to me, what dies option does? I don't see any difference if
synchrozinizing or not.
--
Regards
Ralph
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello e1-cfcj-5p72-51fx,
Monday, May 16, 2005, 10:23:49 AM, you wrote:
ec55ec Can someone explain to me, what dies option does? I
ec55ec don't see any difference if synchrozinizing or not.
I believe that this option is only useful when you have a slow
connection. With a fast
to do so. It has already been fixed.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.5 Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras
env. ~11 POP3, 2 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs.
/env.
os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 /os
Name: Ihr Vor- und Nachname
Email Address: Ihre GMX e-mail-Adresse
POP Incoming Server: pop.gmx.net
POP Outgoing Server: mail.gmx.net
IMAP Incoming Server: imap.gmx.net
IMAP Outgoing Server: mail.gmx.net
User Name: Ihre GMX e-mail-Adresse
Account Name: Eine beliebige Bezeichnung, z.B. Ihre
On 5/17/05, Roman Katzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (Emailias: REPLY-MASKED)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Your Name: Ihr Vor- und Nachname
Email Address: Ihre GMX e-mail-Adresse
POP Incoming Server: pop.gmx.net
POP Outgoing Server: mail.gmx.net
IMAP Incoming Server: imap.gmx.net
IMAP Outgoing
Hi there,
does anybody use (or try to use) the german ISP GMX with IMAP? Does it
work for you and if yes, what are your settings for IMAP?
--
Regards,
Ralph
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Hi there,
does anybody use (or try to use) the german ISP GMX with IMAP? Does it
work for you and if yes, what are your settings for IMAP?
--
Regards,
Ralph
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
Hallo,
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, 21:48:01, Ralph Inselsbacher wrote:
does anybody use (or try to use) the german ISP GMX with IMAP? Does it
work for you and if yes, what are your settings for IMAP?
is that even possible with their free accounts? I seem to remember that
only the paid accounts
Hello TBUDL,
i also tried out IMAP now and i'm confused, since there is no option to
search, not even in the mail headers...
Did i miss something or is that not possible with TB!
--
Regards,
Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP Key ID: 0x5F1A33E3
Running The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:06 PM +0200, you wrote:
i also tried out IMAP now and i'm confused, since there is no option
to search, not even in the mail headers...
Did i miss something or is that not possible with TB!
What do you mean no option to search. You have all searching options at
your
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:12:13 PM (675 Beats):
What do you mean no option to search. You have all searching options at
your disposal.
For a full text search, i guess, i have to make a full sync - is that
right?
The search dialog doesn't seem to work since there's no
Hi Ralph,
On 28/3/2005 3:18 PM +0200, you wrote:
For a full text search, i guess, i have to make a full sync - is that
right?
Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had
all message bodies locally cached.
The alt-click and quick searching also work.
How to use
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:30:23 PM (687 Beats):
Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had
all message bodies locally cached.
Well, the only search method that works for me, is the alt-click-method
(how do i return from those search results to
Allie Martin wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:30:23 PM (687 Beats):
Actually, no. It'll just work, but it wouldn't be as fast as if you had
all message bodies locally cached.
Well, the only search method that works for me, is the alt-click-method
(how do i return from those search results to
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem
to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates...
--
Regards,
Ralph|mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |PGP Key ID: 0x5F1A33E3
Running The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2
Ralph Inselsbacher wrote on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:50:15 PM (701 Beats):
And finally, i see you can sign your messages. However, PGP doesn't seem
to work when i chose my IMAP account as my sending account in templates...
Oops. It sometimes works and sometimes doesn't...
--
Regards
401 - 500 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
