Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-24 Thread TechHome
JohnSwenson wrote: The Touch does support IR blaster through the headphone jack just like the SB3. With the current firmware it's not as capable since it does not support raw mode in the IR blaster plugin. If you already have the correct information for your amp and use it with the SB3 IR

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-24 Thread JohnSwenson
TechHome wrote: Thanks John, the Touch now feeds an Audiosource power amp with signal sensing on the input, but it's good to know this now works. Can you please explain what raw mode is? I used the IR signal capture feature of IR Balster to record the codes; will these codes work? BTW, in

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-24 Thread TechHome
JohnSwenson wrote: I'm not an expert on IR Blaster, I've tested it to make sure it works but that is as far as I've gotten. If my understanding is correct raw mode is very low level information on how the IR beam is modulated. But this is a large sequence of information for each button.

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-22 Thread ralphpnj
TechHome wrote: Just got the Touch presets configured: Settings - Advanced - Beta Features - Shortcuts Only six presets available; I mapped press-hold numeral keys 1 - 6 to presets 1 - 6, which are the same as my Favorites 1 thru 6. Now my touch presets match my SB 2/3s except numeral keys

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-22 Thread JJZolx
Touch has better audio, but the user interface is a step backward in many ways. The SB2/3 and Transporter had a mature interface, while SqueezePlay on the Touch and Radio feels unfinished. JJZolx's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-22 Thread TechHome
JJZolx wrote: Touch has better audio, but the user interface is a step backward in many ways. The SB2/3 and Transporter had a mature interface, while SqueezePlay on the Touch and Radio feels unfinished.Thank you! So very well said in so few words. Reminds me of why I regretfully bought a

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-22 Thread JohnSwenson
The Touch does support IR blaster through the headphone jack just like the SB3. With the current firmware it's not as capable since it does not support raw mode in the IR blaster plugin. If you already have the correct information for your amp and use it with the SB3 IR blaster plugin you should

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-21 Thread TechHome
JJZolx wrote: Using the remote, it's exactly the same. And given that with the SB2/3 the remote interface is all you have, I fail to understand your reasoning. Expecting the touch interface to work exactly like the remove interface makes absolutely no sense.They are not the same; out of the

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-21 Thread JJZolx
Let's try this: Using the remote, you have _exactly_ the same ability to turn off the Touch off that you had with the SB2/3. It's immediate. The music stops. You can set your off screensaver to display either a clock or completely turn off the screen. Consider the Touch interface to be a bonus.

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-21 Thread TechHome
Just got the Touch presets configured: Settings - Advanced - Beta Features - Shortcuts Only six presets available; I mapped press-hold numeral keys 1 - 6 to presets 1 - 6, which are the same as my Favorites 1 thru 6. Now my touch presets match my SB 2/3s except numeral keys 7, 8, 9 do nothing.

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-19 Thread toby10
TechHome wrote: ... Definitely helps, tho still not as fast as with a SB2/3 - it's loads better than hitting the back button repeatedly to power off or just to get home. Well, if using the IR remote then the Touch Off/On functionality is exactly the same as the SB2/3, it's one

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-19 Thread JJZolx
TechHome wrote: Definitely helps, tho still not as fast as with a SB2/3 Using the remote, it's exactly the same. And given that with the SB2/3 the remote interface is all you have, I fail to understand your reasoning. Expecting the touch interface to work exactly like the remove interface

[SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-18 Thread TechHome
A long time Squeezebox user, from the release of the Squeezebox 2 on, I have a mix of nine SB2s, SB3s, radios and now a Touch in my home. Currently running LMS locally on a Vortexbox. In reference to the SB2/3, the Touch seems to be less than optimal in terms to the user experience in a

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-18 Thread rayman1701
To be honest I don't use the touch screen very often, I just find it handier to use the IR remote. However, I just tried and you can just hold on the back arrow on the screen and it goes right to the home screen. As for turning it on off, since it doesn't really use that much different power

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-18 Thread toby10
From anywhere within the Touch menu's if you swipe the screen from L to R you will be taken to the Home menu, for Off/Standby you are seeking. toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553 View

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-18 Thread rgro
toby10 wrote: From anywhere within the Touch menu's if you swipe the screen from L to R you will be taken to the Home menu, for Off/Standby you are seeking. Or, from anywhere, a long press on the back arrow will also bring you to the Home screen.

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Questions from new Touch adopter

2012-04-18 Thread TechHome
Thanks, didn't know about swipes or the press hold of the back arrow. Definitely helps, tho still not as fast as with a SB2/3 - it's loads better than hitting the back button repeatedly to power off or just to get home. Shame that I had to ask on the forums, though; ideally the product should