Re: [transcode-devel] transcode Wiki & services

2015-11-15 Thread Andrew Church
>Hiho, > >I just realized that this mail should NOT go to the mailing list and >changed all passwords mentioned publically here... I was wondering about that ;) I tried the new passwords you sent, but they don't work either -- same error about cookies. --Andrew Church http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] transcode Wiki & services

2015-11-15 Thread Andrew Church
n I set the AdminPass to: Apagirima721 The preferences page won't accept that either -- I get the same error about cookies. It looks like Bitbucket allows you to associate wikis with repositories, so as a last-ditch option I guess I could migrate the wiki content there. Let me know if you want

Re: [transcode-devel] transcode Wiki & services

2015-11-15 Thread Andrew Church
the "CVS access" chapter is >rather outdated as well ;) Hmm, I can't seem to find where I saved the wiki admin password so I can't edit it at the moment. If you send me the password I'll get that updated. --Andrew Church http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] [transcode-users] transcode Wiki & services

2015-11-14 Thread Andrew Church
Hi Jörn, I still have the HG repository here (including a few occasional fixes I've made more recently, like support for newer FFmpeg versions). I can upload that to Bitbucket if you like. --Andrew Church http://achurch.org/ > >Hi David, > >thanks for your response.

Re: [transcode-devel] Re: [PATCH] ffmpeg preset support

2010-07-11 Thread Andrew Church
well. With regard to this particular issue, however, transcode does have a native x264 interface (use e.g. -y x264,lame,avi -N h264,mp3) so there's no need to go through ffmpeg. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] I'm going on Hiatus

2010-02-04 Thread Andrew Church
I wish I could say I'll pick up where you're leaving off, but I'm afraid I'm in much the same boat. But I'll also keep on committing changes from time to time as well (I'm working on cleaning up HEAD a bit right now). Take care! --Andrew Church achu...@achu

Re: [transcode-devel] The berlios incident

2010-01-14 Thread Andrew Church
o zap the repository and re-clone it anyway, just to be safe. I guess we could always think about moving to SourceForge or Google Code if you're worried about a repeat... --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] [HEADS UP][RFC] Changes to the trascode 1.2.0+ installed tree (2/2)

2009-12-07 Thread Andrew Church
hat (or at least >it doesn't complain loudly). >No symbol clash, no complains, no warning, anything. There's actually a good reason why this works--but I'd hate to spoil the fun of figuring it out for yourself. Or else I'm just too lazy to write it up at the moment. :) --

Re: [transcode-devel] [HEADS UP][RFC] Changes to the trascode 1.2.0+ installed tree (2/2)

2009-12-06 Thread Andrew Church
27;t work, we can always go to shared libraries as a fallback. I ought to try and find some time to figure out what state my own local repository is in so I can actually make use of it... --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] [HEADS UP][RFC] Changes to the trascode 1.2.0+ installed tree (2/2)

2009-12-06 Thread Andrew Church
er's filesystem with unnecessary shared objects. With respect to "just doesn't work", granted I haven't actually tried it myself (: but why doesn't it work? Is there some weird symbol dereferencing or some such that causes problems if -lavi/-lwav is added to each module that requires them, instead of to the core? --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] [HEADS UP][RFC] Changes to the trascode 1.2.0+ installed tree (2/2)

2009-12-05 Thread Andrew Church
d the tc* programs link to them >will save a fair number of headaches and annoyances (at least to me). Out of curiosity, what annoyances have you had with them? I've never run into any trouble. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Transcode build failure on FreeBSD/amd64

2009-06-01 Thread Andrew Church
I'll take care of this; sorry about the delay. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/ >I've made a bug report about this issue, but it has not been touched in months >now, and I wasn't sure what to do. I was trying to update the FreeBSD port of

Re: [transcode-devel] transcode 1.1.0 cluster mode, patch to make -W work again for audio processing

2009-02-23 Thread Andrew Church
wasn't aware of the special -W usage, and while one could make an argument for using a different option instead of hacked parameters, we shouldn't break things in 1.1 either way. (: --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] we need a (official) GUI

2009-02-05 Thread Andrew Church
ay to support e.g. installations where transcode is used as a backend to something else). --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/ >Hi. > >As per $SUBJECT. We need an official GUI bundled with the official >package, as mplayer or handbrake (www.handbrake.fr) do.

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-28 Thread Andrew Church
>I'd like to propose this key: > >[+] new feature >[*] changement/improvement (not bugfix) >[!] bugfix >[-] feature dropped > >(More will be added if needed) Looks good to me! --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-28 Thread Andrew Church
l in the date when we release, like with the transcode-0.6 entries in the current ChangeLog. What would you think about that? (We could also have explicit lists of additions/changes/removals instead of the +/*/- marking if you think that'd be better.) --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-26 Thread Andrew Church
er we need to save every single change there is another issue; it might be better to make a more concise list of changes per version instead, like what was done for the early 0.6.x versions. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-25 Thread Andrew Church
is (: but do you have any ideas what's going on here? --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-25 Thread Andrew Church
tory locally I had problems with push/pull missing some of the changesets... Anyway, I'll let you know what the result is shortly. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-25 Thread Andrew Church
ked out. If you believe this is in error, please contact your system administrator. Can you look into this? Alternatively, if you can download the repository from http://achurch.org/transcode.tar.bz2 and extract it on the server, that'd be fine too. Thanks again! --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-24 Thread Andrew Church
FYI, I'm starting the Mercurial adjustments now, so don't commit anything new to the exit1.org repository for the moment. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-24 Thread Andrew Church
>As for forwarding changes to berlios, I've no strong opionions yet. >*Perhaps* is better to start pushing manually. That'd be fine with me, and yeah, probably a good idea until we're used to the new setup. (Though it should only be a matter of adding commit and incoming hooks to push the changes out.) --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] CVS migration to Mercurial

2009-01-24 Thread Andrew Church
here you want to put the final repository), so just let me know your thoughts and I'll get started on it. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] new year, new repo, new roadmap

2009-01-21 Thread Andrew Church
it almost perfect (I just had to tweak a couple of branch merges, IIRC). --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] new year, new repo, new roadmap

2009-01-19 Thread Andrew Church
>Plus, a new topic: > >* switch to graphicksmagic (http://www.graphicsmagick.org/) Good find! I have no argument with that whatsoever. (: --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] some thoughts about the new framebuffer

2009-01-11 Thread Andrew Church
hread_3:encode_audio) --> ... i.e. thread 1 pulls from thread 2 and thread 3 at the same time, so it only has to wait for max(wait_2,wait_3), not (wait_2 + wait_3). Admittedly I'm not sure how well this will work in practice, since the demux stage will be single-threaded and not (ye

Re: [transcode-devel] some thoughts about the new framebuffer

2009-01-10 Thread Andrew Church
declare (dynamically, since e.g. DVDs can have any number of streams) what inputs and outputs it uses. >(and don't be afraid to say "you still don't get it!" if it's the >case ;)) No, I think you got it this time. (: Your method is similar, anyway, and in fact I think I like it better than the one I proposed. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] some thoughts about the new framebuffer

2009-01-08 Thread Andrew Church
>On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:39 +0000, Andrew Church wrote: >> > >What we essentially need is a safe way for a filter _plugin_ (while I >> > >was referring to the core part handling the filtering) to deliv

Re: [transcode-devel] some thoughts about the new framebuffer

2009-01-06 Thread Andrew Church
making each filter copy frames to a distinct output buffer will help enforce this idea of having unconnected input and output streams, I think. (And now that I think of it, most filters end up doing something or other to the entire frame anyway, so not doing zero copy won't make much differ

Re: [transcode-devel] some thoughts about the new framebuffer

2009-01-06 Thread Andrew Church
I'm more concerned about the possibility of resource leakage in general. As a rule, I prefer a mechanism that's robust against leakage (e.g. by having a single free() call that applies to every module) over one which relies on multiple modules to all do the right thing (e.g. call free

Re: [transcode-devel] some thoughts about the new framebuffer

2009-01-06 Thread Andrew Church
ff for the moment if it looks like it'll complicate things, and come back to it later once the basic model is functioning. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] some thoughts about the new framebuffer

2009-01-06 Thread Andrew Church
outputs. This would mean we can't do zero copy processing, but for a first implementation I don't think we should try and stretch that far. (And it wouldn't be that hard to implement anyway; it'd probably suffice to add a reference counter to each frame buffer and let the filter call fr

Re: [transcode-devel] Addendum re: the framebuffer issue

2009-01-04 Thread Andrew Church
;The only drawback is until the sliding window code gets committed, HEAD >will be broken. But reverting the framebuffer code in HEAD is not an >option for me. Agreed. I haven't played around with the (old) framebuffer code much myself, but from my few peeks at it I have to say I wasn

Re: [transcode-devel] psu mode problem with 1.1

2009-01-04 Thread Andrew Church
the moment, it should just be a matter of assigning a frame number and "ready" flag to each buffer; then the export layer can just wait for each frame's "ready" flag in sequence, while the core delegates out frames to the individual filter threads as they become idle. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

[transcode-devel] Addendum re: the framebuffer issue

2009-01-04 Thread Andrew Church
imagine encoders could make better use of multiple threads than filters could anyway. --Andrew Church achu...@achurch.org http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg

2008-12-10 Thread Andrew Church
ady. >While we're on topic, what do you think about moving enterely to >berlios.de ? I don't see a problem with that. It looks like developer.berlios.de is basically a SourceForge clone? As long as it doesn't try to get in my way with weird JavaScript tricks or annoying F

Re: [transcode-devel] [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg

2008-12-10 Thread Andrew Church
offline. You do have to learn to deal with revision numbers varying by repository, but I don't think we're making much use of CVS version numbers as it is, so I doubt that'd be much of a problem. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] 64 bits problem

2008-12-10 Thread Andrew Church
r output and changing --use_rgb to -V rgb24). Can you check again and see if the problem still occurs? If it does, please mention: - Which version of transcode you tried - Whether or not it happens with no "--accel" flag, with "--accel C", and with "--accel a

Re: [transcode-devel] [PATCH] resolves compiling x264 > rev.65 and ffmpeg

2008-12-09 Thread Andrew Church
ptions will be obsolete in later x264 versions.) P.S. Yes, I'm still alive -- I just had an 11-month-long non-maskable interrupt from work to deal with. (: --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] can -c be made to seek?

2008-04-16 Thread Andrew Church
hould go much, much faster. That said, NMS could probably use a seek_to_frame() method for demultiplexors that could do an instant seek if the input source and file format supported it. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Re: Call for partecipation!

2008-03-26 Thread Andrew Church
functionality, save perhaps for transcode's difficulty dealing with pipes (one of the things scheduled to be fixed in the new module system). I also don't see what the maintainedness of an external library has to do with anything; code doesn't rot away just because it's not constantly being changed. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Re: Call for partecipation!

2008-03-25 Thread Andrew Church
transcode aims to be a _utility_, not a _library_ like libav* (and the "ffmpeg" executable doesn't count; it's not much more than a wrapper). --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] NUV type fixes

2008-01-02 Thread Andrew Church
t system, please test and let me know if there are any problems. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

[transcode-devel] NUV type fixes

2008-01-02 Thread Andrew Church
Happy New Year! I hope everyone is enjoying / has enjoyed their holiday season of preference. (: A quick question for Francesco: Did you have any issues with the revised patch I suggested to fix the type problems in the NUV importer? If not, I'll go ahead and commit that to HEAD. --A

Re: [transcode-devel] [patch] asm-types confusion

2007-12-15 Thread Andrew Church
treams on hand to test with. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/ --- Index: import/nuv/README.rtjpeg === RCS file: /cvstc/transcode

Re: [transcode-devel] [patch] asm-types confusion

2007-12-14 Thread Andrew Church
you had a patch along those lines in the works; is that the case? If not, I'll see what I can put together. (*) The _proper_ solution would be to get rid of it entirely and link it in from an external library, but I seem to recall failing to find such a library last time I looked.

Re: [transcode-devel] NMS and export layer, the state of the union

2007-11-20 Thread Andrew Church
thin air... oh well. ;) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Solution for segfault when using export_dv

2007-10-25 Thread Andrew Church
to look into a few issues on CVS HEAD if need be. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] How to port 1.1.0 changes to HEAD

2007-08-31 Thread Andrew Church
= latest version at all times (even after a .0 release), and only branch the old version when I want to start making changes toward a new version (that won't be included in the stable release). Then again, given my, uh, minimal contributions lately, what I think may not be relevant. (: --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Re: CVS HEAD Pending Issues

2007-07-19 Thread Andrew Church
. (Now if only I can get faad2 to compile...) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] [ANNOUNCE] CVS HEAD (a)periodic snapshots avalaible

2007-07-09 Thread Andrew Church
. I agree that PVM should be disabled for the moment; maybe change the configure script to output a warning if --enable-pvm3 is given? --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Apple's assembler

2007-05-12 Thread Andrew Church
ntrivial to port; many have tried but none have yet >succeeded. Oh well, it was worth a thought. I suppose we'll have to use --disable-mmx on OSX Intel until Apple sees fit to get with the rest of the world... --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Apple's assembler

2007-05-11 Thread Andrew Church
ar.gz cd binutils-2.17 ./configure --prefix=/usr make make install ;) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Re: Compiling transcode

2007-04-26 Thread Andrew Church
e use of .balign rather than .align here would avoid such potential trouble, and I'll look into making that change on CVS HEAD when I have a chance.) Note that you can disable assembler code entirely by passing --disable-mmx to ./configure (but this can slow transcode down considerably depe

Re: [transcode-devel] Little docs/ reorganization

2007-03-21 Thread Andrew Church
s. >If noone object, I'll go ahead quickly Looks fine to me. Besides, the history will still be there if for whatever reason we still need it (it just won't be in the same place). --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Re: transcode-devel Digest, Vol 28, Issue 9

2007-03-15 Thread Andrew Church
>I just added a snapshot of 1.1.0 to the tree as well. > >Thanks guys! :) Thanks to you as well. (: Now I just need to find three minutes together to actually do something with transcode these days... --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] YAIT - Yet Another Inverse Telecine filter

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Church
>I've seen filter part mostly (not the tcyait tool), and the code itself >looks good. I've no problem for inclusion (Andrew?). Just for the record, I have no complaints. I also have no spare time to take a detailed look, sorry... ;) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PRO

Re: [transcode-devel] Optional string arguments

2007-02-27 Thread Andrew Church
cessing rules that virtually every other Unixy program obeys. Not that those rules don't have their own difficulties, as demonstrated here, but if we're going to break them I'd much rather break them all at once...) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Optional string arguments

2007-02-26 Thread Andrew Church
to choke. Fixed in CVS (both single and double quotes work). However, note that the shell also processes quotes, so in order to use -x like this you need to write: transcode -x mplayer='"-vf eq2=0.9,pp=dr"',mplayer or transcode -x mplayer="'-vf eq2=0.9,pp=dr'",mplayer --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] enforce single-instance behaviour of NMS modules

2007-02-07 Thread Andrew Church
>Attached patch address both issues outlined above. Feel free to comment. This looks fine to me. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Minor bug in .nuv file timestamp handling

2007-01-24 Thread Andrew Church
le headers from the second and subsequent files and concatenating them, e.g. something like: $ (cat file1.nuv; tail -c+73 file2.nuv file3.nuv) >all.nuv $ transcode -i all.nuv [other options] --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Minor bug in .nuv file timestamp handling

2007-01-23 Thread Andrew Church
t;this. It works for me, though I've only had occasion to use it once or >twice. There are a few issues with the patch itself (no static variables are allowed in shared objects, for one), but the logic looks sound, so I'll commit a similar patch shortly. Thanks for the report!

Re: [transcode-devel] new build system?

2007-01-01 Thread Andrew Church
>As I said: we could use autotools and cmake in parallel, so we could test >cmake without drawbacks. Hmm. Well, if you're willing to put together a cmake build environment, I'd certainly be interested in at least taking a look at it (well, when I have more time on my han

Re: [transcode-devel] new build system?

2007-01-01 Thread Andrew Church
command-line use is considered deprecated. In any case, I would be nervous about using a tool that rewrites user-edited files like this; as complex as the autotools suite is, it does follow the standard input-file-to-output-file process, so it's easy to track the effects of changes.

Re: [transcode-devel] Small bug report

2007-01-01 Thread Andrew Church
heir ASCII equivalents in CVS HEAD. > >Why to not use UTF-8 character instead ? For exactly the same reasons: they won't show in non-supporting environments (such as mine). --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Small bug report

2006-12-17 Thread Andrew Church
ch", the character before "streich" is an O-umlaut, which probably doesn't show on the reporter's terminal (as it didn't on mine), and all such non-ASCII characters have been converted to their ASCII equivalents in CVS HEAD. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] (Minor glitch) Poorly phrased complaint from ./configure

2006-12-12 Thread Andrew Church
cker to hack little changes into something that already works, more or less, than to redo the whole thing from scratch. Maybe one of these days I'll see if I can get any use out of my IRC Services configure script instead... --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] (Minor glitch) Poorly phrased complaint from ./configure

2006-12-12 Thread Andrew Church
gh to be honest, part of the problem is that autoconf doesn't make it easy to do things like command-line checks cleanly--you end up having to split code for processing options into multiple parts.) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/ >If you try and run ./conf

Re: [transcode-devel] Build problem (recent 1.1.0 CVS)

2006-12-12 Thread Andrew Church
e'. 'Make' went >through all the directories and did nothing! Did I miss something? Nope, I goofed. Found and fixed, thanks for the report. (Make sure you rerun autoreconf -f -i after updating from CVS, and if you have a patch for import_nuv.c, please send it along.) --A

Re: [transcode-devel] Missing file in CVS?

2006-12-07 Thread Andrew Church
gi-bin/transcode?Download crystal:/usr/local/src/cvs/transcode> cat .cvsignore Makefile Makefile.in aclocal.m4 autom4te.cache autotools config.log config.status config.h config.h.in configure [...] --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

RE: [transcode-devel] Another issue with MPEG2/VOB, aspect ratios

2006-12-07 Thread Andrew Church
input or output that it happened on, but I think my gut feeling was that mplayer was broken). Quick things off the top of my head: What command line did you use? Does adding --export_asr 2 (for 4:3) or --export_asr 3 (for 16:9) help? --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Missing file in CVS?

2006-12-07 Thread Andrew Church
ne was deleted quite a while ago. Have you regenerated filter/Makefile.in since your last cvs update? (autoreconf -f -i) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Rethinking input directory mode support

2006-12-06 Thread Andrew Church
ead against it, far be it from me to stop you. (: I would suggest, however, that you limit any changes to fixing bugs in the current code, rather than trying a redesign that would just have to be changed again later (and might hamper our subsequent efforts to complete NMS). --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] checking the return value of fwrite

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Church
point of a wrapper like >pwrite which continues on meaningless errors (EINTR) but stops on >larger errors. That would be my own take as well (and is how I've written similar routines in some of my personal projects), but as I'm sure you realize after going through the transco

Re: [transcode-devel] checking the return value of fwrite

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Church
e a write() that doesn't return EINTR: i.e., if an error occurs after writing some data out, it should return the number of bytes successfully written, not -1. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Rethinking input directory mode support

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Church
e/close on a regular file? some ioctl()s are involved? Presumably one would do something like the opposite of dvgrab/kino, using libiec61883 and whatever else, but again this is not something we should be thinking about right now. We need to get NMS finished before trying to add yet more functionality. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] Rethinking input directory mode support

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Church
ink about having to match up stream parameters between each input file. I think we ought to drop directory mode entirely for 1.1.0 and reintroduce it after we get the import system working under NMS, which should make things much easier. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] checking the return value of fwrite

2006-12-04 Thread Andrew Church
option, but I'd rather avoid a routine like the import_write() you suggest that exits on error, and instead have the check and bail at the point where fwrite() is called; that'll make it easier to go through and just replace all the import_exit() calls with error returns later.

Re: [transcode-devel] revamping --color : allow user to disable colorized output

2006-11-30 Thread Andrew Church
ce everything into a single pass until we can rethink transcode's command line entirely (which is _definitely_ not happening for 1.1). --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] revamping --color : allow user to disable colorized output

2006-11-30 Thread Andrew Church
abile to control log colorized output. >Maybe a little less clean but effective. > >I like b) most even here. That seems reasonable to me as well. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] VOB Plugin issue

2006-11-21 Thread Andrew Church
Francesco, do you have any idea on this? I don't do much (well, anything) with -x vob, and I don't really have the time to look into it in detail at the moment. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/ >Hi, > >I'm just wondering if the VO

Re: [transcode-devel] encode_lame added to CVS HEAD

2006-10-23 Thread Andrew Church
>OK, I'm adding flush hooks on encoder core (src/encoder.c) following >approximatively this model. Hopefully code will hit CVS in a few days. >Please bug me if I start being late. Thanks, and don't worry--I'm awful busy at the moment myself... --Andrew Church [E

Re: [transcode-devel] x264 svn has changed abi

2006-10-14 Thread Andrew Church
the user has. I figure that as long as transcode is still in CVS, we can assume up-to-date versions of other libraries (though a configure check is probably in order). Once 1.1.0 is released, then the code will start getting messy, I imagine. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

[transcode-devel] import_ffmpeg

2006-10-12 Thread Andrew Church
e fact that I'm on a dual-core system? I've left --threads at default, so it _should_ still be 1... --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

[transcode-devel] rm -r contrib

2006-10-10 Thread Andrew Church
in English. Does anyone object if I just get rid of the entire directory? Speak now, as in before the next time I ls /usr/local/src/cvs/transcode, or forever hold your peace ;) docs/ needs to be cleaned up too, but that's a slightly more cumbersome undertaking... --Andrew Church [

Re: [transcode-devel] encode_lame added to CVS HEAD

2006-10-09 Thread Andrew Church
a quick look at tcmodule*.h, but it doesn't look like they're in the structures yet. Actually, since we already have a stop(), it might be simpler to let stop() handle file closing and add a start() method for file opening--that way we can also redefine configure() so that it's only for configuring and doesn't act like a start() as well. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

[transcode-devel] encode_lame added to CVS HEAD

2006-10-09 Thread Andrew Church
is that a bug in x264 (a missing EMMS instruction somewhere) can cause bizarre floating-point errors in transcode. Either disable acceleration with --accel C (slow!) or apply the patch I posted to the x264-devel list: http://www.via.ecp.fr/via/ml/x264-devel/2006-10/msg00044.html until the bug is

Re: [transcode-devel] using TC_{IMPORT, EXPORT}_* macros in returning values in modules

2006-10-08 Thread Andrew Church
Right now I think we only need to worry about module interface functions--local stuff can do whatever it wants, and the main code doesn't need to worry about it. And now I need to get to sleep before the sun comes up again ;) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] using TC_{IMPORT, EXPORT}_* macros in returning values in modules

2006-10-08 Thread Andrew Church
Sorry, I didn't realize that was you ;) I though TC_EXPORT_* were part of OMS and therefore going away. If we're going to use constants, we should probably pick better names. (Maybe just TC_OK and TC_ERROR?) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] cvs head - commandline parse bug

2006-10-06 Thread Andrew Church
ed as -v -f, and -v causes transcode to print its version and exit immediately. If there's any hang going on, it would be a program/script expecting transcode to output something and not properly handling cases when it doesn't. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] cvs head - commandline parse bug

2006-10-04 Thread Andrew Church
>I accidentally typed: > >-vf pp=ha/va/dr \ > >instead of: > >-J pp=ha/va/dr \ > >and produced a nasty lockup with hung children. I can't reproduce this. What was the full command line? --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] transcode cvs head

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew Church
I hope we can get done. But after 1.1.0, as you say--it's not critical (as long as people don't use huge -u values). >I defintively must figure out how to live without sleeping :^) You and me both ;) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] transcode cvs head

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew Church
scode to allocate only as much space as was actually needed for processing, but there's currently no way to propogate size changes through the processing pipeline, so that'll have to wait for a future version.) --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] transcode cvs head

2006-09-27 Thread Andrew Church
;) > >But 51.16.0 is okay, right? Yup, sorry if that was confusing. I was trying to test the -m problem after upgrading FFmpeg yesterday (the version at that time being 51.15.0), and all of a sudden transcode was crashing left and right. Nearly sent me into a panic before I noticed

Re: [transcode-devel] transcode cvs head

2006-09-27 Thread Andrew Church
audio file. It's fixed now, thanks for the report. > libavcodec version: 51.16.0 While I'm here, let me mention that 51.15.0 will make transcode crash and burn, just in case anyone else recently upgraded FFmpeg and discovered that all of a sudden they couldn't transcode an

Re: [transcode-devel] errors compiling CVS HEAD

2006-09-26 Thread Andrew Church
27;m looking into a workaround, but the immediate solution is to upgrade to GCC 4. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

[transcode-devel] Heads-up on CVS HEAD

2006-09-14 Thread Andrew Church
und in comments in most source files, is now an Oe). Will Unicode eventually make it as a worldwide text encoding standard? Only time will tell... --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

Re: [transcode-devel] New command line parser

2006-09-13 Thread Andrew Church
ree' field is the index of buffer that DOES NOT have the 'real' >video frame data in the pair of buffers that vframe_list_t >carries (so it has 0/1 possible values). Sounds like that's the problem. (: Yes, ptr->free should indicate which buffer is _not_ being us

Re: [transcode-devel] New command line parser

2006-09-12 Thread Andrew Church
about what it was supposed to do, but since libtc didn't pay it any attention it wasn't really meaningful. ;) It might still be a good idea to implement a switch like that, but that can be re-added after the code to handle it is in place, rather than trying to drag around old code that wasn't designed for it. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

[transcode-devel] New command line parser

2006-09-11 Thread Andrew Church
be any regressions at first glance. If something does pop up, comment out the #define NEW_CMDLINE_CODE line in src/transcode.c to re-enable the original processing code. The new code will still get compiled in, but (aside from the moved variables) won't get used. --Andrew Church [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://achurch.org/

  1   2   >