You can use cygwin to do gcc compiles for windows. It comes with automake
(don't know what version) and can be integrated with Eclipse CDT.
S
On 8/9/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe automake can run on Windows using some linux portability layer
(I
forget what it's called).
On 10/08/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use cygwin to do gcc compiles for windows. It comes with automake
(don't know what version) and can be integrated with Eclipse CDT.
S
That's the one! Does it produce dll's that run native on windows or does the
output depend on other
You can make native windows dll's and executables. The last time I was
involved in this kind of build we actually used ant on windows and linux in
top of gcc (in cygwin for windows) to drive the build for the large number
of different systems we had to support (there were some strange HPC type
Hi,
The maven-assembly-plugin version we used (2.2-SNAPSHOT) caused a lot of
problems in my build. Is there any reason why we cant use the stable version
2.1? I have tried 2.1, it works fine.
Thanks,
Jervis
-
To unsubscribe,
Forgot to mention, this is used by distribution standalone module.
-Original Message-
From: Liu, Jervis
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:04 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: maven-assembly-plugin version?
Hi,
The maven-assembly-plugin version we used (2.2-SNAPSHOT)
Jeremy,
I think that bin and lib directories should be fine. If you have the
bandwidth to help with the assembly definition that would be great, thanks.
Kelvin
On 09/08/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 5:30 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at some
For the JavaScript question the problem is the JavaScript container isn't
included by default in the standalone distribution. As a work around for now
you could either modify the assembly standalone.xml to include the
JavaScript container when its building the distribution or you can
manually
RMI Binding
---
Key: TUSCANY-611
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-611
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Venkatakrishnan
Attachments: Tuscany-RMI-Binding-Aug-10.diff,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-611?page=all ]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-611:
-
Assignee: ant elder
RMI Binding
---
Key: TUSCANY-611
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-611
Great stuff Jim, these changes look really good to me. Makes implementing a
binding way easier.
What do you think about having an abstract SPI class for the TargetInvoker
which includes all the cachable, optimizable and invoke methods?
...ant
On 8/10/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-611?page=all ]
Venkatakrishnan updated TUSCANY-611:
Attachment: Tuscany-RMI-Binding-Aug-10-Updated.diff
Hi... there is one addition that has been missed out in the prev. patch. My
sincere apologies
IIRC the 2.1 version caused the build to be run twice. We have been
using the snapshot for a while - what problems did you see?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 10, 2006, at 2:04 AM, Liu, Jervis wrote:
Hi,
The maven-assembly-plugin version we used (2.2-SNAPSHOT) caused a
lot of problems in my build. Is
Java SDO Overview doc doesnt address setting of M2_REPO variable
Key: TUSCANY-612
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-612
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Deployment question: Does the name of the .composite file HAVE to match the
name of the composite? Previously we just loaded any sca.module file and the
name= parameter gave the module name. There is still a name= parameter
so we end up with a file called CalculatorComposite.composite with
If Jervis hit the same issue I did, the problem was that the
2.2-SNAPSHOT is now dependent on
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:1.0-alpha-7-SNAPSHOT which wasn't
available in any of the configured repositories.
I ended up pulling it from snapshots.repository.codehaus.org to resolve
the
... also are we enforcing the directory containing the composite to also be
named after the composite?
On 10/08/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deployment question: Does the name of the .composite file HAVE to match
the name of the composite? Previously we just loaded any
Well, now I know the boundaries of the Apache/Eclipse cross-licensing
agreement. :-)
The code in question is straight-forward reflection code to find and invoke a
method (3 lines of code + exception handling). I use it to pull the ClassLoader
out of a bundle context. I'll submit a fix to get
I had an offline chat with lresende about a similar effort for DAS, so
perhaps we could meet on IRC sometime soon, and go through what needs to be
done?
Cheers, Kelvin.
On 09/08/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 5:30 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking
well, not a big issue, but the snapshot version have to be downloaded everyday,
and sometimes the snapshot version is not very stable. For example, today's
assembly-plugin try to download
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:jar:1.0-alpha-7-SNAPSHOT, but I checked
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/
That's excately what I used. The one thing I'd add a version for the exported
packages. It helps the package admin service avoid runtime incompatabilities
when sewing up bundle dependencies.
Export-Package: org.osoa.sca.annotations;version=1.0,
org.osoa.sca;version=1.0
Cheers,
Joel
Also, I get a NPE when running SCAGEN on the BigBank sample - everything
seems to get happily generated though. The output is below - anyone else see
this?
Pete - are you still using VC++6 for windows development? I have a VC++7 SCA
build working happily here if you want the patch.
Andy
On
I too ended up downloading an available version of the snapshot jar from the
codehaus site and renamed it to 1.0-alpha-7-SNAPSHOT after which the build
has gone thro
- Venkat
On 8/10/06, Liu, Jervis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, not a big issue, but the snapshot version have to be downloaded
I haven't seen the NPE. I'm currently trying to get the scatest program
working on linux. I'm happy to leave VC6 broken for now until the changes
settle down. If you are happy with the VC7 then please submit the patch.
Were there many changes?
Cheers,
On 10/08/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL
Hi Jim,
When you have some time to chat, I have a few questions about references.
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yea we could do that. Probably the one invoke method that takes the
payload from the message could be abstracted and if there is a
special target type that needs access to message headers or something
it could just override it. Do you want to create one as I'm out later
today?
Jim
On
OK. I have the sca runtime building on vc6 fine. Calculator project builds
fine too. Having some teething problems getting it running.
On 10/08/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not many - it was mostly a case of putting the new files in and taking the
old ones out.
Saying that, I
Hi Thomas,
I think we met at JavaOne briefly...I haven't had a chance to look
closely at Joel's work yet (just waiting for the removal of the EPL
licensed class) so I'll let him jump in with more details. I think
one of the interesting areas is going to be with sharing services
between
Hi Ignacio,
I'm out today and tomorrow. Could you maybe post to he list and I'll
try and respond as soon as I have a chance to pick up email?
Jim
On Aug 10, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hi Jim,
When you have some time to chat, I have a few questions about
references.
Hi again,
Just following up on this thread to see if there's anything we can
do from our side to help you all with the migration, or any concerns
or questions I can answer.
I have noticed that some people are still using MSVC 6 to compile
Tuscany. I'm curious whether there are any plans to
I have put a fairly rough collation of our IRC chat on the wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/Building/SdoDistroChat and
linked it through from http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava
Regards, Kelvin.
On 10/08/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had an
Move to 0.95 spec Assembly model
Key: TUSCANY-613
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-613
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: C++ SCA
Affects Versions:
Hi Martin,
We are using VC6 but have also got VC7 projects. Our command line build for
windows uses the VC6 generated makefiles. We don't think that's possible in
VC7+. Of course the best solution will be to create a proper commnad line
build.
We are just starting to restructure the code so will
I wasn't planning on defining a custom runtime, only setting up a runtime by
passing the information currently contained in the defualt.scdl file
directly to the loader, bypassing the file system.
What I am trying to do is create all the classes and interfaces for the
system in memory, and then
I have checked in code for TUSCANY-613 to build the new sca code on windows
MSVC6. Calculator also builds and runs.
I had to make one change to ModelLoader where I have changed the logic to
load all .composite files in the folder rather than just the one that
matches the folder name. The
Andrew Borley wrote:
Also, I get a NPE when running SCAGEN on the BigBank sample - everything
seems to get happily generated though. The output is below - anyone
else see
this?
Pete - are you still using VC++6 for windows development? I have a
VC++7 SCA
build working happily here if you
Add operator debug info for DataObjectPtr and others
--
Key: TUSCANY-614
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-614
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Pete Robbins wrote:
[snip]
I have checked in code for TUSCANY-613 to build the new sca code on
windows
MSVC6. Calculator also builds and runs.
I had to make one change to ModelLoader where I have changed the logic to
load all .composite files in the folder rather than just the one that
matches
I'm getting the same NPE, didn't notice it before. If I comment out
AccountDataService in the .composite file I'm not getting the NPE so it
must be specific to this particular service or AccountDataService.h
maybe? I have no idea why Options.set(...) would throw an NPE on ly with
I have to say I have never looked at the Java code but I have editted the
stylesheets to fix problems.
Cheers,
--
Pete
Passed with 7+1s from:
Pete Robbins
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Ant Elder
Kevin Williams
Daniel Kulp
Kelvin Goodson
Jim Marino
Welcome to Tuscany Andy! I will start the process of getting your account
created.
Cheers,
--
Pete
Pete Robbins wrote:
Hi Martin,
We are using VC6 but have also got VC7 projects. Our command line build for
windows uses the VC6 generated makefiles. We don't think that's possible in
VC7+. Of course the best solution will be to create a proper commnad line
build.
We are just starting to
I've followed the code through - it basically walks the .composite and
.componentType files and then the header files, converts this info into an
xml doc and the runs a set of stylesheets to create the proxy and wrapper
files.
I can take a look at this when I get time - it doesn't seem to be
Preferred userid: ajborley
Full name: Andrew Borley
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws ws-tuscany
ICLA has been submitted and appears on
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
Vote result 7+1 votes and no -1s:
I've just put up a patch on TUSCANY-613 for MSVC7. Includes SCA, BigBank and
Calculator projects.
Cheers
Andy
On 8/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
[snip]
I have checked in code for TUSCANY-613 to build the new sca code on
windows
MSVC6.
Hi Jeremy,
(I will most certainly spend some effort looking up the code myself :-) but
just wanted to validate some thoughts)
Are there SCDL readers? For example I imagine that there is a
scdl-file-reader that reads an scdl file and creates an scdl object model.
So the deployer starts by
Thanks for the feedback. I made the changes that you suggested.
There are two topics worthy of further discussion.
1. ( previously brought up) Having an initial println in SDO samples that
would provide a link for users to see the source code if running from an IDE
such as Eclipse.
+ nice
AJAX interaction is always good for traction these days, just as a cool UI
has always been attractive. The speration of presentation and application
implementation is great and obviously nothing new or particular to SCA. Is
fine grained service interaction with the UI a good thing from a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-610?page=all ]
Joel Hawkins updated TUSCANY-610:
-
Attachment: ClassloaderHook.java
Hi Jim,
You can remove the AbstractReflector class from
org.apache.tuscany.osgi.core.impl and replace the old
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-611?page=comments#action_12427326
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-611:
---
Committed. Thanks Venkat!
RMI Binding
---
Key: TUSCANY-611
URL:
Hi Venkat, I've committed this patch now. Had some problems getting the
patch to apply cleanly so had to fiddle about a bit, could you check it
looks ok to you? The code needs formatting so maybe you could send in
another patch doing that? I've also not added the service and reference
samples to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-610?page=comments#action_12427336
]
Joel Hawkins commented on TUSCANY-610:
--
Hi Thomas.
I'm trying to write up some documentation now. In short, however, the code
breaks down into 2 parts:
Hi,
Do we plan to move the ImplementationProcessor framework to the SPI module?
When I'm working on the databindings, it comes out some requirements for
extensibility on annotion processing as well.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I started to implement the new composite assembly model I felt a
need to adjust a little the folder structure under the Tuscany system
root, did half of it, which triggered some questions :) This is a new
thread to discuss these changes.
Here's what we had in M1:
It looks like Tuscany-model.config just lists the WSDLs and XSDs used in
an application. Do we still need it? or could we just figure out
ourselves what the WSDLs and XSDs are?
Just trying to make it simpler for users to write SCA applications, and
limit the number of things that they have to
We have some basic parsing code for WSDL service contracts right now
but this needs to be finished. To put a stake in the ground I intend
to make the following work:
* support for parsing interface.wsdl elements
* support for WSDL resolution based on the WSDL2.0 wsdlLocation
mechanism. This
Here's a note from the SCA spec 0.95:
Note: The Eclipse naming convention for plugins provides a good way to
achieve unique names,
e.g. com.mycompany.myvaluecomposite . This format is recommended but is
not normative.
I'd like to adjust our samples to follow that recommendation (e.g.
On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Sure, I want to make sure I understand what local callbacks (or
plain invocations for that matter) via references means.
I was defining a local callback as being a bidirectional wire to a
target component, which (by definition) is in
Thanks Venkat. Just a quick question: do you think it is best to have
one Registry per service or could we have one Registry per runtime
instance and have services register with that? If you think the
latter may be something that works better, one thing that could be
done is to create a
58 matches
Mail list logo