On 8/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Nash wrote:
> >
> > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>
> >>> A few questions.
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>> ant elder wrote:
> >>>
> I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we act
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
A few questions.
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put
the code in
our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessary the Geronimo
guys could
use SVN extern
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
A few questions.
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put the
code in
our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessary the Geronimo
guys could
use SVN externals if they really
On 8/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > A few questions.
> >
> > [snip]
> > ant elder wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put the
> >> code in
> >> our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessa
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
A few questions.
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put the
code in
our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessary the Geronimo
guys could
use SVN externals if they really want it).
Necessary yes, as far
This should be fixed in the latest trunk code, is it possible for you to try
that?
...ant
On 8/18/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Manu,
>
> Thanks for investigating the problem and figuring out this work
> around. It
> worked after I changed the interface element to int
Manu,
Thanks for investigating the problem and figuring out this work around. It
worked after I changed the interface element to interface.java. May be we
should open a JIRA for this in Tuscany.
Best regards,
Vamsi
On 8/18/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This NullPointer
Hi,
This NullPointerException is occurring when i am using a wsdl
interface definition. It works when I use interface.java
http://localhost:8080/hello/HelloWorldService"/>
The error occurs in the createAxisService
I agree. An "tuscany-all" jar with minimum required classes to run tuscany
will be very helpful for users.
Vamsi
On 8/18/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This doesn't seem ideal to me, people using Tuscany should not have to
> know
> these intimate details of how we put the Tuscany co
This doesn't seem ideal to me, people using Tuscany should not have to know
these intimate details of how we put the Tuscany code together. It will go
wrong (and does here as subsequent messages in the thread show) and makes
using Tuscany seem really complicated. Couldn't this just use a single
dep
On 8/17/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Simon. I have made this change and it works fine now.
>
> Vamsi
>
> On 8/17/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > After a bit of digging I found that the dependency that gets us the
> > WorkManager inte
Thanks Simon. I have made this change and it works fine now.
Vamsi
On 8/17/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > After a bit of digging I found that the dependency that gets us the
> WorkManager interface now is in our core module. We now use
>
>
> org.apac
snip
>
> helloWorld-ws.jar is attached.
It looks ok to me. I notice that the helloworld ws sample now uses a wsdl
less approach which should work. In case there is an issue with this code in
you situation you could try specifying the WSDL explicitly. So your binding
would be something like
http
>
>
> After a bit of digging I found that the dependency that gets us the
WorkManager interface now is in our core module. We now use
org.apache.geronimo.specs
geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec
1.0
So you should replace the tuscany commonj dependency
A few questions.
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put the code in
our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessary the Geronimo guys could
use SVN externals if they really want it).
Necessary yes, as far as I know the Geronimo guys are t
On 8/17/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stack trace for the ActivationException:
>
>
> 19:28:47,578 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now
> in the FAILED state:
>
> abstractName="TuscanyArtifacts/helloWorld-ws/1187353576031/car?ServiceModule=TuscanyArt
Stack trace for the ActivationException:
19:28:47,578 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now
in the FAILED state:
abstractName="TuscanyArtifacts/helloWorld-ws/1187353576031/car?ServiceModule=TuscanyArtifacts/helloWorld-ws/1187353576031/car,j2eeType=GBean,name=EmbeddedRuntim
Hi Simon,
I have got rid of tuscany-interface-java-runtime and
tuscany-interface-wsdl-runtime. Removing commonj-api resulted in a
NoClassDefFoundError, so I had put that dependency back. After cleaning up
the local repo of any tuscany sca jars, I have realized that the
EmbeddedSCADomain in trunk
On 8/17/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> org.apache.tuscany
> commonj-api
> ${tuscanyVersion}
> jar
> classes
>
>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca
>
org.apache.tuscany
commonj-api
${tuscanyVersion}
jar
classes
org.apache.tuscany.sca
sca-api
${tuscanyVersion}
jar
On 8/17/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hit a new error. Stack trace given below:
>
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>
> org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/java/introspect/JavaInterfaceIntrospectorExtensionPoint
> at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
> at jav
On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that
> the
> >> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not i
Hit a new error. Stack trace given below:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tuscany/sca/interfacedef/java/introspect/JavaInterfaceIntrospectorExtensionPoint
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:242)
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.em
On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that
> the
> >> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not i
Simon Laws wrote:
On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that the
published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or
not
the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities.
Vamsi
On 8
On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that the
> published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or
> not
> the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities.
>
> Vamsi
>
>
> On 8/14/07,
I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that the
published 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars in maven repos are not in syc or not
the latest?? I can not think of other possibilities.
Vamsi
On 8/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <
On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
> > LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us feedback.
> >
> > Please follow
On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
> LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us feedback.
>
> Please follow the instructions at
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/san
Hi,
We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us feedback.
Please follow the instructions at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/rfeng/geronimo-demo/README.TXT.
The demo scenario is captu
30 matches
Mail list logo
