Hi
I've cut the release 1.1. branch and you can find it here
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.1/
).
I've just checked it out. I very nearly got a clean build. I had an itest
failure in itest/wsdl which went away when I compiled from the module
itself. So I'd
On Jan 4, 2008 3:18 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 3:02 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
Simon
ant elder wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 5:22 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(cut)
I thought that the scenarios
On Jan 7, 2008 9:29 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I'll start with chat-webapp.
...ant
On Jan 7, 2008 9:12 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have time today to help fix samples for R1.1? This is what I see
with
the current R1.1 code (Windows XP SP2, IBM JDK
On Jan 7, 2008 4:26 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised this doesn't work. It looks like you have set this up
just like the calculator-ws-webapp sample. I tried this sample and it
works as expected. Can you try this sample to see if it works for you?
Simon
wang feng
On Jan 7, 2008 7:19 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon.
It seems that you replied to the wrong thread :-).
By reading the stack trace, the exception is from Java2 security. Do you
have the J2 security turned on?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon
On Jan 7, 2008 8:33 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can look into this, and provide ant script support for the bpel sample.
On Jan 7, 2008 12:19 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 7:19 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Simon
On Jan 8, 2008 7:33 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem to be possible to start a Node that belongs to a Domain
anymore.
Node.start() throws the following Exception:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.NodeException: Node is part of domain
http://localhost:9998 so
On Jan 8, 2008 12:23 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 4:14 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The chat sample was broken from all the context path problems, I've
fixed
that so its running again now but it only works using polling not
comet/reverse ajax which
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for investigating. Re. the not stopping issue...
I suggest to not take risks as the problem existed in previous releases
and only release the fix in release 1.2.
+1
While debugging I came across a more serious issue with the 1.1 distro,
described in TUSCANY-1954
I suggest that others please update the chart as well to keep everybody
updated and avoid double work.
--
+1
Also I'm just copying the *nix part of RC0 now up to
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC0/.
Will be done in 30 minutes.
Simon
+1, which one do people prefer?
I don't have a preference but, arbitrarily, I'm trying the build with
tuscany-host-jetty at the moment to see if it works.
Simon
On Jan 9, 2008 4:58 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can you add the ASL to this wrapper WSDL? I created it to import an
external
WSDL.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent
}
return null;
}
});
}
Any ideas would be appreciated...
[1] http://marc.info/?l=ant-userm=119982919309601w=2
On Jan 7, 2008 1:24 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 8:33
I have the secure-big-bank demo running
I have authentication running in helloworld-ws-reference/service-secure.
However I can't get integrity to work as I can't get the certificates right.
How do people feel about me commenting out the integrity part of the sample
and just going with
Many of the samples issues have been addressed now see (
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.1+Samples). There
are still issues with
binding-notification-consumer
the integrity part of helloworld-ws-reference/service-secure
Closedown behaviour generally
I can live with
a) runtimes of various kinds (SCA standalone, embedded within Tomcat, etc)
We know need to be able to run tuscany applications in different
environments but I want to understand what runtime means, how they are
built, how they are shipped and how they are used given the scenarios we
want to
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC1/
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC1/
This includes the
?
Thanks
On Jan 10, 2008 10:25 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC1/
The artifacts are available
One alternative is to find a way to share some of the jars between
runtimes,
eg, if the standalone distribution includes all the jars then it is
possible
to get Tomcat deep integration to work running off those jars outside of
the
Tomcat install. So that way we could have both the
A concern with that is we're then not shipping anything prebuilt for
webapps
or webapp samples...and the majority of the users we have posting on the
user list seem more interested in running in webapps and tomcat than
standalone.
...ant
webapp does seem to be the environment that is
On Jan 11, 2008 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lresende
Date: Thu Jan 10 20:50:35 2008
New Revision: 611046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=611046view=rev
Log:
TUSCANY-1936
Modified:
incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tools/wsdl2java/pom.xml
Modified:
On Jan 9, 2008 10:44 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
Domain controller incorrectly loading contributions added to nodes.
---
Key: TUSCANY-1957
URL:
On Jan 12, 2008 1:31 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new releases need to follow the revised distribution policy. some
initial document is available at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution
but please ask on the general list before
On Jan 13, 2008 7:28 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing some exceptions when trying to build quote-xquery sample.
It works ok from the sample project folder, but from samples root or
source root it fails with the exception below. I'm stil investigating
the issue, but just
On Jan 13, 2008 8:13 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 4:03 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Thanks for the pointer. Haven't got into the the detail of the release
distribution documentation you refer to yet but something did catch my
eye
On Jan 13, 2008 5:36 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
[snip]
If you do find issues with the release candidate that you think need
to be fixed and lead to a -1 please review
, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 7:28 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing some exceptions when trying to build quote-xquery sample.
It works ok from the sample project folder, but from samples root or
source root it fails with the exception
On Jan 14, 2008 7:34 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Have we decided to ship tuscany-host-jetty-1.1-incubating only (without
tuscany-host-tomcat-1.1-incubating) as the fix for TUSCANY-1954? If so, we
need to make sure that all of the ant scripts for modules that references
On Jan 14, 2008 9:09 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Have we decided to ship tuscany-host-jetty-1.1-incubating only (without
tuscany-host-tomcat-1.1-incubating) as the fix for TUSCANY-1954? If so,
we need to make sure that all of the ant scripts for
snip...
because of TUSCANY-1976. What do I need to do to build the WAR before
the
fix is included in the next RC?
run mvn in the alert aggregator demo directory and this should produce the
build-dependency.xml file. You can then build the demo with ant. I actually
ran it in the release
snip...
I'm not sure what's the best way to get the problem fixed in 1.1 release.
Maybe we have to document it instead of adding code to generate the
Geronimo-specifc geronimo-web.xml for each webapp samples.
Do we have to generate the code? Can we just drop a hand crafted file into
If we mark them Closed right now they'll be out of the verification
radar
screen in the next RC and we will forget to verify them.
See what I just did with TUSCANY-1976 [1] which was in the Closed state.
I
Reopened it to put it in the Resolved state.
+1 sounds like a plan
snip..
would be omitted from the manifest jar. If host-tomcat is named in the
manifest jar and is present in modules then I think both host-tomcat and
host-jetty will be available at runtime.
Is that right? Our MANIFEST.MF looks something like
Class-Path:
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Samples which fire up Axis2 don't run in Geronimo
(TUSCANY-1986)
snip...
I'm not sure what's the best way to get the problem fixed in 1.1release
snip..
Are you using maven in offline mode (mvn -o) ?
From ant's experience, one must do a mvn in online mode first, before
it can use the mvn -o.
Please let me know if this helps.
I did a full build on the latest code from the branch this morning and it
failed. On closer inspection I can
On Jan 15, 2008 10:45 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
I was checking the various pom.xml that had a reference to
servlet-api, and noticed that we have multiple versions around.
What should be the servlet-api version we should be using ? Currently
we have
snip...
src/main/webapp/WEB-INF. There are only a small number of webapp
samples
(8?) so I'll go and do it if you think that will work.
Correction. There are only 3 webapp samples that use web services so only
these require this information in order to run in Geronimo
Simon
We only ship one pre-built war now (sample-calculator-webapp.war). We
removed the others to reduce the size of the distribution. Why do we retain
this one?
Simon
Following on from the comments in [1] I now see that it is
javax/xml/stream/stax-api so I suspect it's not ASL2. Although I have read
mail archives saying the intention was to release it under ASL2. Anyone
know where this jar originates so I can check. I see them here [2][3] but
there is no
A summary so I can check where we are as I would like to cut RC2 as soon as
I can. Today preferably. From the 1.1 JIRA page [1]
TUSCANY-1987 Build break in osgi-implementation itest
I've just seen that Rajini made a patch
TUSCANY-1974 Chat webapp sample misses chat messages
not
On Jan 15, 2008 4:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
We only ship one pre-built war now (sample-calculator-webapp.war). We
removed the others to reduce the size of the distribution. Why do we
retain
this one?
I don't know
Build break in itest/osgi-implementation.
More details in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1987.
Could the folks working on OSGi please help fix it?
Rajini has provided a patch with which I get a clean build on windows. Can
others try a clean build of the branch (on linux if
On Jan 15, 2008 5:34 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 1.1 release, I guess it's OK to add the WEB-INF/geronimo-web.xml for
these 3 samples. I'll check in the changes.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev
I'm in the middle of building and uploading RC2. The linux .gz artifacts are
up there (http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/) the windows ones
are on their way but will be a good while yet (on the very slow network at
home). I'm off for some sleep so I'll tidy up and start the vote in
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC2/
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC2/
This includes the
Hi Dave
I think the error that is being reported
Snip...
[java] org.osoa.sca.ServiceUnavailableException: Service not
found for component JMSClient reference service (bindingURI=null
operation=process).
Ensure that the composite containing the service is loaded and
started somewhere in
/TUSCANY-1998
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1984
On Jan 16, 2008 4:56 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany
Re.
snip...
org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.impl.JMSBindingException: No
JMSHost extension point registered
[java] at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jms.provider.JMSBindingProviderFactory
.init(JMSBindingProviderFactory.java:45)
[java] ... 14 more
What's on the
On Jan 17, 2008 9:08 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got the manifest jar on the classpath.
Dave.
OK, thanks Dave. I hadn't spotted you'd included the build.xml in the zip
also.
I think the problem is originating here.
[java] 16-Jan-2008 22:54:27
On Jan 17, 2008 2:09 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SCA 1.1 distro ships Derby 10.1.2.1 whereas in the SCA 1.0.1 we
shipped
Derby 10.1.3.1. Is there a reason for this change? I'm guessing it
probably
makes no real difference to us, it just feels slightly odd to be going
back
so
snip..
On Jan 17, 2008 1:10 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the reply.
Updating the composite as you suggested removes the reference target
warning, however the No JMSHost extension point registered exception
is still thrown.
Cheers,
What platform and
On Jan 17, 2008 5:49 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
Can you explain why/how to regenerate the keystore? We were struggling
with
this issue last week.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
though so i'll leave others to comment on that,
...ant
On Jan 16, 2008 12:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags
On Jan 18, 2008 12:38 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 4:20 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
I've reviewed the RC and think its looks ok to release. All the legal
stuff
looks ok, most of the samples i've tried run ok. There's a few
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3/
The artifacts are available for review at:
I've started getting...
1) org.jvnet:mimepull:jar:1.1
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.jvnet -DartifactId=mimepull \
-Dversion=1.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
On Jan 21, 2008 1:58 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This respository is already in the databinding-jaxb pom.xml. I did
encounter this once today, but was gone the next build :)
- Venkat
On Jan 21, 2008 4:32 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started
I think we need to keep in mind the bigger overall picture when thinking
about these details, if we've been getting too much into the
implementation
detail would help to step back a bit - the following are the things i
think
we're trying to do here:
1) applications to contain only the
On Jan 21, 2008 6:55 PM, Lou Amodeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute
as a first class attribute on its associated bindings model object.
This request is based on a requirement to provide support to implement a
late-endpoint
snip...
1) have the consumer spawn new threads to process each request (using the
existing Tuscany thread pool). One problem with that is i don't think we
can't do QOS using the standard JMS APIs as once the consumer returns the
message is considered successfully processed but the spawned
I created a helloworld-reference/service pair for JMS last week when I was
looking into some JMS questions on the list. They use the same scenario as
the binding.jms unit tests but seems a shame to throw them away so I checked
them into samples. The service unit test is currently turned off as it
On Jan 23, 2008 12:22 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 2:09 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip...
1) have the consumer spawn new threads to process each request (using
the
existing Tuscany thread pool). One problem with that is i don't think
we
Hi Scott
snip...
A key piece of the puzzle would be the ability to query what's on the
other side of the binding.For example, I might have a binding
impl with a co-located (same-JVM) optimized path in which I don't want
to do a transform if the service impl uses the same DB as the
On Jan 21, 2008 5:47 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Folks,
Here's my +1
Yours, Mike.
Simon Laws wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags
Hi,
The Tuscany project had a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the
Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release. The vote thread on tuscany-dev has
7 +1s and an archive can be found at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27321.html
The release includes new
Hi sebb
Thank you for the detailed review.
Can you tell me what you mean by
On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/01/2008, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being
distributed are OK.
Surely the archive
Hi sebb
Thank you for the detailed review.
Can you tell me what you mean by
On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/01/2008, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being
distributed are OK.
Surely the archive
On Jan 24, 2008 5:58 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 4:20 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updating this list with other suggestions gives (added points 6-9):
1) applications to contain only the code and other artifacts required
for
the application itself
On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi sebb
Thank you for the detailed review.
Can you tell me what you mean by
On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb
Sebastien/Ant
Here's a longer scenario, showing how I want to use contributions and
composites in a domain for the store tutorial I've been working on.
A real eye opener. Thank you for this.
snip...
getting this to work on a single node first without the gui and individual
deployment
Hi
snip..
The first time, I got an out of memory error from Java.
Try doing set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m before doing the build
BTW, it looks like the M2 build downloads multiple versions of some jars,
e.g :
Do you mean the M2 build - that's pretty old?
However, the second time I tried,
A new release candidate has been created to address comments made on the
IPMC Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating RC3 VOTE thread on general@
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16483.html
The follow changes have been made to create RC3a
- where possible remove the work files that are
On Jan 25, 2008 12:50 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Jan 27, 2008 8:17 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new release candidate has been created to address comments made on the
IPMC Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating RC3 VOTE thread on general@
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16483.html
The follow changes have been
Add the
code that loads all contributions that are available from the file
system.
Ant already has this code in various forms
We can do simpler than load all contributions that are available from
the file system as the list of contributions to be loaded in a node is
determined from the
On Jan 28, 2008 2:17 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me it would be useful to create a binary archive without any
of the external jars.
This would considerably reduce the size of the archive.
Most of the jars are likely to remain the same between releases anyway.
On Jan 28, 2008 1:57 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like the SVN eol-style:native properties have not been set up
for some of the xml files, for example:
modules/binding-dwr/pom.xml
This causes problems when working on the files using both Windows and
Unix.
Also, at least
Hi,
The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some
issues.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16483.html
A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues as
discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thread in
snip...
I'm not too keen on scanning a disk directory as it doesn't apply to a
distributed environment, I'd prefer to:
- define a model representing a contribution repository
- persist it in some XML form
I've started on some model code in my sandbox [1]. Feel free to use and
abuse.
Perhaps you could issue the external dependencies in a separate
archive; that would need the appropriate N L of course, but would not
change very often.
Sounds attractive. So we would have
tuscany-binaries
tuscany-dependencies
tuscany-src
I think this would be an advantage if we go ahead
On Jan 29, 2008 9:11 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 9:04 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you could issue the external dependencies in a separate
archive; that would need the appropriate N L of course, but would not
change very often
An alternative to what we do now with all the licenses embedded in the one
top level LICENSE file is to include the licenses in individual files
either
in a separate licenses folder or in the same folder as the dependency so
its
real easy to see if any are missing and what they apply to. I
On Jan 28, 2008 5:38 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip...
I'm not too keen on scanning a disk directory as it doesn't apply to a
distributed environment, I'd prefer to:
- define a model representing a contribution repository
- persist it in some XML form
I've started
On Jan 29, 2008 4:22 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline. Note that I have also some prototype of a install
program in my sandbox.
On Jan 29, 2008 7:14 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 5:38 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
On Jan 30, 2008 10:02 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK.
What about the files that are in SVN but missing from the source archive?
Hi Sebb
Yes, there are still some files in the tag, from which the released
artifacts (binary and source) are constructed that are not included in the
snip...
Spring provides another package with the binaries, samples and docs,
without dependencies [1], but I was not trying to cover samples when I
pointed to the Spring example and was not suggesting to only have two
Neither was I. just pointing out that Spring takes a slightly different
On Jan 30, 2008 11:14 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 10:02 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK.
What about the files that are in SVN but missing from the source
archive?
Hi Sebb
Yes, there are still
On Jan 30, 2008 1:56 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 11:14 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01
On Jan 30, 0008 1:13 PM, Continuum VMBuild Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=43866projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 30 Jan 2008 04:02:59 -0800
Finished at: Wed 30
On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 11:14 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 10:02 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK
On Jan 30, 2008 12:24 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
The model in my sandbox [2], which is very simlar to the XML that the
current contribution repository uses, now holds node and contribution
name
information [3]. These could be two separate
On 1/30/08, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 6:55 PM, Lou Amodeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a request to propogate the value of a references target=
attribute
as a first class attribute on its associated bindings model object
On Jan 31, 2008 10:25 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
...ant
On Jan 27, 2008 8:17 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new release candidate has been created to address comments made on the
IPMC Tuscany Java SCA 1.1-incubating RC3 VOTE thread on general@
http
snip...
The value from the reference target is currently set to the target when
the reference is matched to a target service.
I don't quite follow the above. Are you saying that the service URI
is copied into the reference binding URI at the matching stage? Is this
the fully resolved
On Jan 30, 2008 2:08 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 1:56 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi Lou
A question relating to the phasing here.
Along these same lines, I am looking to emit, as a file, the WSDL
required
for client development. This needs to be emitted prior to the start of
the
service so obtaining it from ?wsdl is not feasible.
Is this something you want to do
On Jan 31, 2008 2:30 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
...ant
On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified
On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for graduating
to an Apache TLP.
The attempt back in November raised issues about diversity and since then
it
feels like we've just been waiting around hoping diversity
On Feb 1, 2008 12:27 PM, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Folks,
I think that there may be a problem with building the SCA code from trunk.
I did an svn update on my system yesterday and then did mvn clean.
This FAILED, complaining about not being able to find jars relating to
Saxon
snip..
On Jan 31, 2008 8:44 PM, Lou Amodeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon, This timing of this is more of a service side requirement than
a
client one. Due to some dependencies I have I need to have access to a
physical WSDL file at service provider startup.
OK, I see. Where would you
1001 - 1100 of 1885 matches
Mail list logo
