= Connected to: www.cytauk.com
GET / HTTP/1.0
Host: www.cytauk.com
HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Location: ./cytauk2/
= Connected to: www.cytauk.com
GET /./cytauk2/ HTTP/1.0
Host: www.cytauk.com
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Firefox seems to redirect to www.cytauk.com/cytauk2/ ignoring the extra
implementation.
Best wishes,
Stan
- Original Message -
From: Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd an...@magsys.co.uk
To: twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 7:13 PM
Subject: [twsocket] HTTP relocation
= Connected to: www.cytauk.com
GET / HTTP/1.0
Host
Hello,
A user will be on a page. He will click a button and I will receive a URL
with some parameters. All good.
Now, I do not have a page to show him. The URL is only for passing in the
parameters. The URL for the page passing the parameters and the current page
are not the same. The URL for
On 21-07-2012 21:22, zayin wrote:
I was wondering if there is a better solution. Some answer code that tells
the browser the data was received but not to change page or to reload the
button host page.
http://www.w3schools.com/ajax/default.asp
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for
Hello,
Thanks.
It looks like: AnswerString(Flags,'204 No Content','','',''); works fine.
Ciao,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Hi!
I would like to extend my existing ICS-based HTTP server to allow upload
and removal of files on the server. From reading the HTTP specs at [1] it
seems that the natural commands for these actions would be PUT [2] and
DELETE [3].
Unfortunately the THttpServer/THttpConnection components do
Tobias Rapp wrote:
Hi!
I would like to extend my existing ICS-based HTTP server to allow
upload and removal of files on the server. From reading the HTTP
specs at [1] it seems that the natural commands for these actions
would be PUT [2] and DELETE [3].
Unfortunately the
OK, I asked to my customer if he could convert his p7b'scertificate to a
PEM with the private key included and he accepted : now it WORKS FINE !! ^_^
Thanks to all of you, it helps me to understand these formats by the way ;)
Guillaume ROQUES
Le 20:59, Fastream Technologies a écrit :
Private
OK, thanks to all of you.
I'm going to ask it from my customer and find a command line to convert
p7b with the private key.
Gratefully (at the end ;),
Guillaume ROQUES
Le 20:59, Fastream Technologies a écrit :
Private keys are created during CSR (Certificate Signing Request) creation.
He
Message -
From: Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP SSL Server vs p7b certificate's format
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
And ICS logger says :
15:57:49:896 InitCtx OpenSSL version
So as my customer bought a wildcard certificate, it must include a
private key or do I need to generate one ?
Actually, the problem comes from me or the customer ?
Gratefully,
Guillaume ROQUES
http://www.canyon.fr/
Le 20:59, Arno Garrels a écrit :
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
And ICS logger
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
So as my customer bought a wildcard certificate, it must include a
private key or do I need to generate one ?
When you order a certificate the private key is generated locally by a
browser plugin, JAVA or ActiveX, it's true private and not even the
certificate issuer
Private keys are created during CSR (Certificate Signing Request) creation.
He who ordered the cert should have it.
Best Regards,
Subzero
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 17:43, ROQUES Guillaume
guillaume.roq...@canyon.frwrote:
So as my customer bought a wildcard certificate, it must include a private
If that doesn't help, use a TIcsLogger to get a full debug log
and send that to me if you don't find the error yourself.
So I tried a few things with ICS logger ON, but no answers.
First Delphi code to intialize TSSLContext :
with MySslContext do
begin
SslCertFile
I tried mycertificate with the OverbyteIcsSslWebServ demo :
* httpserver responding
* sslhttpserver not responding
* sslhandshake failed
_
Configuration :_
* Write to log file : ON
* Display header : ON
* Display SSL info : ON
* ICS logger.logoptions := [loSslErr,loSslInfo,loSslDump];
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
And ICS logger says :
15:57:49:896 InitCtx OpenSSL version: OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008
15:57:49:897 error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line
error:140B0009:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file:PEM lib
So I checked MyCertificate.pem and I've got 3
support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP SSL Server vs p7b certificate's format
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
And ICS logger says :
15:57:49:896 InitCtx OpenSSL version: OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008
15:57:49:897 error:0906D06C:PEM
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
Do you ask for how to get a ICS TSslHttpServer working with a bought
server certificate?
Yes, and if I need to convert p7b's certificate or not ?
Open the MyCertificate.pem in a text editor that understands UNIX
line breaks. Does MyCertificate.pem include multiple
What client is connecting
when that error happens?
IE 7 to 9 or Firefox
But none ask to add certificate, both say that the site is
unreachablesounds weird I know T_T
Cordialement,
Guillaume ROQUES
http://www.canyon.fr/
Le 20:59, Arno Garrels a écrit :
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
Do you
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
What client is connecting
when that error happens?
IE 7 to 9 or Firefox
But none ask to add certificate, both say that the site is
unreachablesounds weird I know T_T
Have you tried newer OpenSSL libraries?
http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download
If
That's confusing description. Did he buy a SSL server certificate in
order to access your server? Or are you talking about client certificates?
The customer already have a SSL certificate on his domain, so he want
that my HttpServer use SSL with this certificate.
Please provide more details
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
That's confusing description. Did he buy a SSL server certificate in
order to access your server? Or are you talking about client
certificates?
The customer already have a SSL certificate on his domain, so he want
that my HttpServer use SSL with this certificate.
Do
Do you ask for how to get a ICS TSslHttpServer working with a bought
server certificate?
Yes, and if I need to convert p7b's certificate or not ?
Open the MyCertificate.pem in a text editor that understands UNIX line
breaks. Does MyCertificate.pem include multiple certificates?
With a bought
ROQUES Guillaume wrote:
Hi everyone,
I use ICS HTTPServer via SSL and a Self-Signed certificate (It is OK
for an internal use). One of my customer had to access our Web server
from outside and bought a ceritificate to a Certificate Authority
(GlobalSign) in p7b format.
That's confusing
Scrive Wilfried Mestdagh wilfr...@mestdagh.biz:
Hi Angus,
Yes indeed, I found out already. The authentication is an argument in the
POST command. When it is invalid or missing the server returns a 401 with
the missing header line. Is that a bug in the server?
Probably it is a bug in the
Hello,
I'm trying to POST to a server that needs authentication. I expect a 401
from the server with in the header something like:
WWW-Authenticate: Basic Realm=/something
But it is not in the response. Also what does the 'connection: close' mean?
I think the THttpCli does not send an
I'm trying to POST to a server that needs authentication. I expect
a 401 from the server with in the header something like:
WWW-Authenticate: Basic Realm=/something
This is a pure guess, but maybe the WWW-Authenticate header is only
returned for GET requests, with POST you are supposed to
://www.expertsoftware.be
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org]
Namens Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Verzonden: zondag 18 september 2011 15:10
Aan: twsocket@elists.org
Onderwerp: Re: [twsocket] HTTP 401 missing header line
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
The authentication is an argument in the POST command. When it is
invalid or missing the server returns a 401 with
the missing header line. Is that a bug in the server?
The two SMS providers I'm testing provide a range of error messages
including
No, it must be with THttpServer on very fast (say local) connections. With
Wireshark I can see the data does not reach the client and it timeouts.
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:49, Fastream Technologies ga...@fastream.comwrote:
I think you are right. However there is an issue in my
Hello,
We have an important issue with HTTPClient: Only under WinXP, when I POST
data to an ICS server, it returns StatusCode = 0 and empty RcvdStream! Has
anybody seen this behavior before? I am using the latest snapshot of
yesterday (v7).
Regards,
SZ
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings
Well, it turned out to be an ICS web server issue on XP as the client works
well with other IPs. Also the server engine debug exe (which is just the
service code wrapped in simple GUI) also works yet the service! I cannot
access the Services section of Windows too--gives error about ActiveX. The
We have an important issue with HTTPClient: Only under WinXP, when
I POST
data to an ICS server, it returns StatusCode = 0 and empty
RcvdStream! Has anybody seen this behavior before?
No, my public web site is using the latest ICS v7 snapshot and POST works
fine from Windows XP with MSIE
I think you are right. However there is an issue in my code in service
application mode. I believe it should be something related with Windows
account permissions but not sure...
Regards,
SZ
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:22, Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
an...@magsys.co.uk wrote:
We
Thanks, I can confirm, it works now without problems.
Lars
-Original Message-
From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org
[mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:35 AM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP Server creates
: Re: [twsocket] HTTP Server creates extremly high CPU load
Lars Gehre wrote:
I think, I found something.
Thanks for reporting, I just checked in a fix.
Available via SVN now or included in next daily snapshot
here: http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download
--
Arno Garrels
...@elists.org
[mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On Behalf Of Lars Gehre
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:49 PM
To: 'ICS support mailing'
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP Server creates extremly high CPU load
Well I was a little to fast with my conclusion. It only
happens to files in the demo because
] On Behalf Of Lars Gehre
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:21 AM
To: 'ICS support mailing'
Subject: [twsocket] HTTP Server creates extremly high CPU load
Hello all,
I have a serious problem with the http server component from
ICS7 (downloaded from the repository last week).
I'm using
Of Arno Garrels
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:49 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP Server creates extremly high CPU load
Lars Gehre wrote:
I noticed one thing: This only happens if files are involved, for
virtual documents it does not happen.
I cannot reproduce
Hello,
http://www.cs.cf.ac.uk/Dave/PERL/node201.html
Use ICS ExtractURLEncodedValue function to decode these parameters
Thanks for the link and the function.
Mark
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
On 18-03-2011 17:03, zayin wrote:
It all shows up fine but when the user hits the accept button I get back the
'Tagname' with the added '+
' symbols Stop+Pump+CRT. Why not just Stop Pump CRT?
http://www.cs.cf.ac.uk/Dave/PERL/node201.html
Use ICS ExtractURLEncodedValue function to decode
On 07-03-2011 06:31, Arno Garrels wrote:
That's sounds like a bug. I would expect that THttpCli is reset to
default values after that error?
I don't see any reference to 10053 in any of the ICS code, so I
suppose this situation is not being handled internally by the THttpCli.
Because the
On 07-03-2011 06:31, Arno Garrels wrote:
TWSocket property KeepAliveOnOff may be used to setup winsock to send
keep-alive packets in the background in order to detect such brocken
connections, however that's not reliable since both peers must support
it and routers have to route the keep-alive
RTT wrote:
On 07-03-2011 06:31, Arno Garrels wrote:
That's sounds like a bug. I would expect that THttpCli is reset to
default values after that error?
I don't see any reference to 10053 in any of the ICS code, so I
suppose this situation is not being handled internally by the
THttpCli.
RTT wrote:
On 07-03-2011 06:31, Arno Garrels wrote:
TWSocket property KeepAliveOnOff may be used to setup winsock to send
keep-alive packets in the background in order to detect such brocken
connections, however that's not reliable since both peers must
support it and routers have to route
Isn't the CtrlSocket.State reliable to know if a connection is still on?
I'm trying to reuse an THttpCli, but I'm getting 10053 errors if a
persistent connection is idle for some time, I suppose the server
keepalive timeout.
The ICS THttpCli code check this CtrlSocket.State property, to try to
RTT wrote:
Isn't the CtrlSocket.State reliable to know if a connection is still
on?
No it isn't. Whether or not a connection is still alive can only be
known if either the FD_CLOSE notification from winsock is received
or an attempt to send or receive failed or succeeded.
For example,
Hi,
Has anybody here got Digest authentication working mith MS ISA Server 2006?
I already waisted hours to enable it with the web proxy.
Neither IE nor Firefox got authenticated (407). I already checked option
Store password using reversible encryption in the user properties and
also tried to
Not sure with ISA 2006 but IQP 5.0 supports digest authentication (that
works) for CONNECT.
Regards,
SZ
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody here got Digest authentication working mith MS ISA Server 2006?
I already waisted hours to enable
Arno Garrels wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody here got Digest authentication working mith MS ISA Server
2006? I already waisted hours to enable it with the web proxy.
Neither IE nor Firefox got authenticated (407). I already checked
option Store password using reversible encryption in the user
In my tests, I saw that Java (client) has a long time digest auth bug too.
Regards,
SZ
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Arno Garrels wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody here got Digest authentication working mith MS ISA Server
2006? I already waisted hours to
Since you rae writing a page check software, it is probably ggod
enough to not handle the cookies and to refuse relocation if the
url is the same url.
That did occur to me, unfortunately the LocationChange event does not
have the AllowMoreRelocations parameter that the
Hello,
I have a question: Let's say the request has Content-Range: 50-100 for a
file of length = 100. Now we want to return the Range: 50-100/100 as
GZipped. the last 50 bytes of the file is compressed to 40 bytes. How should
one construct the response header? Range? Content-length?
Regards,
SZ
Oops, I mixed the Content-range response header with Range request
header. Other than that the issue still remains.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Fastream Technologies
ga...@fastream.comwrote:
Hello,
I have a question: Let's say the request has Content-Range: 50-100 for a
file of length =
Is it valid for an HHTP header to relocate to an empty URL?
Currently, HttpProt seems to parse the relocation to the same URL, and
goes into a loop.
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: http://
Temporary Redirection: http://www.telecomstrader.com/ to:
http://www.telecomstrader.com/
Angus
--
To
an...@magsys.co.uk
To: twsocket@elists.org
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:12 PM
Subject: [twsocket] HTTP Location
Is it valid for an HHTP header to relocate to an empty URL?
Currently, HttpProt seems to parse the relocation to the same URL, and
goes into a loop.
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location
The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
response. Unless the request method was HEAD
I am using the HEAD method, this is a web site checker confirming 1,500
URLs in a database still exist each week... I'll try GET.
Angus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for
On May 20, 2010, at 05:59, Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
response. Unless the request method was HEAD
I am using the HEAD method, this is a web site checker confirming 1,500
URLs in a database still exist each
Not exactly what I said ;-)
I said that irrespective to what RFC could imply, some sites intentionally
use redirection to the same location, and the site (server) should normally
prevent endless looping. If it's not, than indeed a client should protect itself
- whether it is implemented in
It is not clear to me from the spec, but if it makes the express
assertion that it SHOULD give the new URI in the response to
non-HEAD requests, by omission it seems to me that it then MUST
do so for HEAD.
It's not unusual for servers to treat HEAD differently, I had to fix the
ICS web
This is a patch to handle deflate HTTP encoding.
Henri.
Index: OverbyteIcsHttpCCodZLib.pas
===
--- OverbyteIcsHttpCCodZLib.pas (revision 488)
+++ OverbyteIcsHttpCCodZLib.pas (working copy)
@@ -29,6 +29,13 @@
procedure
I'm testing an application that has to control a remote machine.
The communication goes through an intermediate http server that connects 2
http clients.
A--Server--B-machine
computer A controls computer B wich controls the machine.
When computer B is located in the US, some message aren't
I'm testing an application that has to control a remote machine.
The communication goes through an intermediate http server that connects 2
http clients.
A--Server--B-machine
computer A controls computer B wich controls the machine.
When computer B is located in the US, some message aren't
Yes, using HTTP/1.1 you have perstant connexions. See Keep-Alive in the
source code.
That's what I'm using, but it's not the same.
When I post a stream (10k as test) to the server which then sends it to the
other computer, it's about 90 times faster then sending 1000
10byte-strings.
of couse,
Yes, using HTTP/1.1 you have perstant connexions. See Keep-Alive in the
source code.
That's what I'm using, but it's not the same.
When I post a stream (10k as test) to the server which then sends it to
the other computer, it's about 90 times faster then sending 1000
10byte-strings.
of couse,
I don't agree with you. HTTP protocol has all support for real keep alive
connections. request can even be sent before the previous answer has been
received.
BUT most commercial webserver do break the connection very quickly.
Probably to be able to support a large number of clients. If you
I don't agree with you. HTTP protocol has all support for real keep alive
connections. request can even be sent before the previous answer has been
received.
BUT most commercial webserver do break the connection very quickly.
Probably to be able to support a large number of clients. If you
Well, proxies may also break the connections.
Never had problems with that, but new requests are delayed somehow.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at
Any idea for below question? ;)
TIA,
SZ
On 6/6/09, Fastream Technologies ga...@fastream.com wrote:
Hello,
I wonder why this PUT command is not supported by the web server component?
Isn't it exactly the same as POST except the method name? Or maybe there is
a trick I need to know??
Hello,
I wonder why this PUT command is not supported by the web server component?
Isn't it exactly the same as POST except the method name? Or maybe there is
a trick I need to know??
Best Regards,
SZ
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Arno Garrels wrote:
Steve Endicott wrote:
I think I've found a problem with how HttpProt handles relocation.
Thanks! It's at least registered,
Reproduced and just checked in (V6 and V7).
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Steve Endicott wrote:
I think I've found a problem with how HttpProt handles relocation.
Thanks! It's at least registered, will try to look at it closer when
I have some minutes left if nobody of the HTTP-specialists (i.e.
Francois) were faster.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change
I think I've found a problem with how HttpProt handles relocation.
First, I have to give some background. I'm using Turbo Delphi 2006 and
using an older version of ICS (HttpProt.pas ver 1.94 last updated
12/10/06). I haven't kept up with the latest revisions or followed them
too closely so I
Hi,
Good day. Does HTTP Client support Digest Auth? Francois said it's supported in
Server, but I assume that it's not present in HTTP Client, am I right?
Thanks.
Junior
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Junior Ang wrote:
Good day. Does HTTP Client support Digest Auth?
Hello,
Yes, it's a new feature in ICS v7.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at
Arno Garrels wrote:
Junior Ang wrote:
Good day. Does HTTP Client support Digest Auth?
Hello,
Yes, it's a new feature in ICS v7.
Should have mentioned, that it is available only in the ICS v7
SVN repository, more details how to get access can be found on the
ICS homepage.
--
Arno
Paul wrote:
Both client and server are ICS (application server)
Client asks server for the next command that the client should execute
locally.
If the server has no command available for the client, he postpones
the answer for 20 seconds.
During that 20 seconds, there should no
- Original Message -
From: Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de
Maybe it is due to the new keep-alive timeout feature of v7 THttpServer?
No, I didn't use the latest version because I don't need that feature.
The application server has it's own system to remove clients.
All servers I have
That did the trick, it works now. Fortunately the new ICS (Version 5)
hasn't affected anything in the current project, but I do have older
projects
that I made modifications to the ICS code which I will have to recode.
Making changes in ICS components is never a good idea unless you
I am using Delphi Professional 6.0 pack 2 with ICS. I'm not sure what version
of ICS I am using since I don't see the version number in the README. However,
I checked HttPProt.pas and the final comment reads:
Oct 15, 2004 V1.71 lotauro.mauri...@dnet.it enhanced basic and NTLM
Scrive robertoschler robertosch...@yahoo.com:
I am using Delphi Professional 6.0 pack 2 with ICS. I'm not sure what
version of ICS I am using since I don't see the version number in the README.
However, I checked HttPProt.pas and the final comment reads:
Oct 15, 2004 V1.71
.
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Maurizio Lotauro lotauro.mauri...@dnet.it wrote:
From: Maurizio Lotauro lotauro.mauri...@dnet.it
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP Post hanging during Basic authorization phase
(2nd phase)
To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 7:12 PM
Hello all,
I'm currently working system for streaming (DVB-)Recordings via http/get
with the ICS V5 http server and delphi 7.
Most of these recordings are way bigger than 2 GB (MaxInt). The problem is
easy to replicate: use VLC (videolan.org) to open a http-Stream on the http
server demo and
Lars Gehre wrote:
I believe all versions of ICS have these problems (at least with
Delphi 7 but I don't think integer or longword are suddenly Int64 in
newer delphi versions).
It seems that ICSv6 and v7 both support Int64:
{$IFDEF UseInt64ForHttpRange}
THttpRangeInt= Int64;
Lars Gehre wrote:
I believe all versions of ICS have these problems (at least with
Delphi 7 but I don't think integer or longword are suddenly
Int64 in
newer delphi versions).
It seems that ICSv6 and v7 both support Int64:
{$IFDEF UseInt64ForHttpRange}
THttpRangeInt
Lars Gehre wrote:
Lars Gehre wrote:
I believe all versions of ICS have these problems (at least with
Delphi 7 but I don't think integer or longword are suddenly
Int64 in
newer delphi versions).
It seems that ICSv6 and v7 both support Int64:
{$IFDEF UseInt64ForHttpRange}
Hi all,
exists any THttpCli implementation that support digest access
authentication?
Thanks,
Emanuele
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Hi all,
exists any THttpCli implementation that support digest access
authentication?
Thanks,
Emanuele
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
emanuele bizzarri wrote:
Hi all,
exists any THttpCli implementation that support digest access
authentication?
Good question, I always wondered why the guy who implemented digest auth
in the HTTP server didn't add it to the THttpCli as well?
--
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
Hi,
Well that's because we did design the THttpServer digest code for a web
server and a proxy and did not feel the need for THttpCli support. That
would be good idea though it was not personally me who coded it but Peter
and Francois.
Regards,
SZ
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Arno Garrels
Scrive Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
emanuele bizzarri wrote:
Hi all,
exists any THttpCli implementation that support digest access
authentication?
Good question, I always wondered why the guy who implemented digest auth
in the HTTP server didn't add it to the THttpCli as well?
As I
Hi!
DZ-Jay wrote:
A way to create a multi-part response is to encapsulate
it as a MIME 822 message. Here's some basic information on this:
http://www.motobit.com/tips/detpg_multiple-files-one-request/
I stumbled over the following lines on that page:
| The situation is even worse if
Yes, it is for web browsers. The target is any and all with HTML only.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francois PIETTE
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 12:34 AM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP...
I have
On May 16, 2008, at 02:49, zayin wrote:
Yes, it is for web browsers. The target is any and all with HTML only.
Thanks.
Then you have to let the browser retrieve each resource individually.
Unless you are using a custom browser, in which case, you can make it
do whatever you want.
Hello,
I have a server and I want to send a jpeg to the client upon request. This
image is dynamic. I am using AnswerStream and that is all working great.
Then I decided I also wanted some text to go before the image.
I could not determine how to send text and an image with the same reply.
zayin wrote:
Hello,
I have a server and I want to send a jpeg to the client upon request. This
image is dynamic. I am using AnswerStream and that is all working great.
Then I decided I also wanted some text to go before the image.
I could not determine how to send text and an image
DZ-Jay wrote:
What you want to do is send a multi-part MIME payload in the body of
your HTTP response. You have to set the content-type to
multipart/form-data. For more information, check this page:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.4.2
dZ.
Please
Thanks. I will look into it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DZ-Jay
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 3:15 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] HTTP...
DZ-Jay wrote:
What you want to do is send a multi-part MIME payload
I have a server and I want to send a jpeg to the client upon request. This
image is dynamic. I am using AnswerStream and that is all working great.
Then I decided I also wanted some text to go before the image.
I could not determine how to send text and an image with the same reply.
So, I
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Link_prefetching_FAQ
Not sure what the implication is for the server -- maybe the idle
prefetch is done with a link verb?
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:52 + (GMT Standard Time), you wrote:
My IIS/6 logs show a method I've not seen before:
LINK /dunman/
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
