Discussion about bug #615504

2010-08-16 Thread Leandro de Oliveira
Hi, I've filed a question that was transformed into a bug was redirected for discussion in some mailing list. I'm guessing this is the right one. Here is a direct link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/615504 The main issue is that a symlink named libbluetooth.so is required for bluecove

Re: Discussion about bug #615504

2010-08-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Leandro, Leandro de Oliveira [2010-08-16 15:29 -0300]: The main issue is that a symlink named libbluetooth.so is required for bluecove to work without user intervention. This sounds like a build system bug of bluecove. Library packages must not install a versionless libfoo.so symlink

strace for a thunderbird bug, since I can't use launchpad ~_~

2010-07-30 Thread John Moser
My 'net is broke enough that I can't log in to freaking Launchpad. Been trying for 40 minutes, the page won't load. Here's an strace for whichever bug # it is. I just updated Thunderbird in 10.04, and now I can't switch to the Inbox tab or else it eats infinite memory and crashes the whole

Re: bug reporting and file descriptors...

2010-07-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 23:27:38 (CEST), Daniel J Blueman wrote: With certain types of bug, it really helps to know what file descriptors were open at the time of crashing. For example, gstreamer is crashing in libavformat, however no information was gathered to show the path of inodes

Re: bug reporting and file descriptors...

2010-07-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 14:10:23 (CEST), Martin Pitt wrote: Reinhard Tartler [2010-07-22 13:00 +0200]: 7 - /home/daniel/test.mp3 Would it make sense to have this information, or have I overlooked something? I think it would be incredibly helpful. Note that we got quite a lot of

IPv6 rooute rule adding bug

2010-07-09 Thread Fanta Private
There is error using ip and route command when you want to add new route to ipv6. I experienced similar error programming routing protocol using netlink. for 'ip error: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument for route error: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument e.g: ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 301::1/64 route

Re: Launchpad bug linking to U1 client spec behind a secret login

2010-07-06 Thread John Rowland Lenton
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 06:49:50PM -0700, Dylan McCall wrote: I was hunting for information on the bug (it _is_ a bug, right?) where the U1 Nautilus extension in Maverick shows its bar thingy all the time, instead of just under folders that are synced. (I would hope that's a bug, by the way

Launchpad bug linking to U1 client spec behind a secret login

2010-07-03 Thread Dylan McCall
Hi! I was hunting for information on the bug (it _is_ a bug, right?) where the U1 Nautilus extension in Maverick shows its bar thingy all the time, instead of just under folders that are synced. (I would hope that's a bug, by the way…) I found this in Launchpad: http://code.launchpad.net/bugs

Re: Announcing the Next Ubuntu Bug Day! - Thursday 24th June 2010

2010-07-02 Thread jairo mayorga
Can you look NUMO soc and G.hn from ncomputing.com and homegridforum.org Thanks 2010/6/22 Kamus kamu...@gmail.com Fellow Ubuntu Triagers! This week's Bug Day target is *drum roll please* fontconfig! * 49 New bugs need a hug * 4 Incompletes bugs need a status check * 27 Confirmed bugs

live cd bug or missing feature

2010-06-24 Thread Linus Newbert
Hello, While working on a custom livecd (based on Kubuntu 9.10 LiveCd) I stumbled upon a 100% reproducible bug (or better missing feature to go to a wishlist): - boot from the livecd - create a new user with admin rights and encrypted home - logout ubuntu - login with new user - copy

Is it a bug of kexec?

2010-06-19 Thread Bill Lee
are killed, but it does not perform umounting or syncing. So I think it is a bug of either kexec or shutdown. -- Best regards, Bill Lee -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu

Fwd: Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

2010-06-04 Thread James Hogarth
Oops missed reply to all.. Sent from Android mobile -- Forwarded message -- From: James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com Date: Jun 4, 2010 1:36 AM Subject: Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163) To: Arand Nash ienor...@gmail.com Given the nature

Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

2010-06-04 Thread James Hogarth
Err thanks... my bad with the Android client ;-) Speaking with regard to this update in particular the patch that broke kvm on certain systems was to fix a kvm security issue cve-2010-0419. The fix was to revert the patch that dealt with the error until a better patch can be developed... The

Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

2010-06-03 Thread James Hogarth
this get straight to release with no testing in proposed? What is the point of having proposed for bug testing if a released package never goes through it - especially for something as critically important to the core system as the kernel? Hopefully the issue can be fixed soon so those of us who

Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

2010-06-03 Thread Arand Nash
is pushed by Ubuntu as the virtualisation system to use) it presents a reasonably serious problem. How did this get straight to release with no testing in proposed? What is the point of having proposed for bug testing if a released package never goes through it - especially for something

libpam-runtime: /etc/pam.d/common-auth bug?

2010-04-22 Thread Patrick Goetz
This list is actually cited as the package maintainer in the package status for libpam-runtime, so I thought I would run this by here first before filing a bug against the package just in case I'm terribly confused. Both in the /usr/share/pam/common-auth template and in various instantiations

libpam-runtime: /etc/pam.d/common-auth bug?

2010-04-22 Thread Patrick Goetz
Here to answer my own question after a little more RTFM. The preceding common-auth lines are set up using the new-fangled jump feature: -- auth [success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so nullok_secure auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_ldap.so use_first_pass # here's the

Re: Kernel bug in Intel driver

2010-04-18 Thread Mark Ellse
It is a great encouragement to know that this Intel bug is being treated so seriously. It also helps, greatly, to have an idea of the timescale involved so that users, like myself, can plan. For that reason I have posted your comment to the bug report. Thank you for all that is being done

Bug#577721:

2010-04-17 Thread Iain Buclaw
Attaching update to the kbsd patch, should resolve the issue for you all. Have a nice day. Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p e ? p++ : p) = (c 0x0f) + '0'; Index: patches/gdc-fix-build-kbsd.dpatch === ---

Re: Kernel bug in Intel driver

2010-04-17 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 09:54 +0100, Mark Ellse wrote: Also, what about this one, which freezes graphics on a large number of Intel boards? (Is Intel a small, insignificant manufacturer whose products are not a priority?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug

Re: Kernel bug in Intel driver

2010-04-16 Thread Mark Ellse
Also, what about this one, which freezes graphics on a large number of Intel boards? (Is Intel a small, insignificant manufacturer whose products are not a priority?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/456902 On 16 April 2010 03:21, Ryan Dwyer ryandwy

Kernel bug in Intel driver

2010-04-15 Thread Ryan Dwyer
What are the chances of having this fixed before Lucid's release? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/554432 Basically, the computer crashes when a video is played. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe

openshot crashes because of a libmlt bug

2010-04-14 Thread Chris
Hello everybody, I like to raise attention on this bug which crashes openshot. An openshot developer pointed out that it is an libmlt but and this is the official libmlt e-mail address, that's why I wrote you. Thanks in advance. Bug link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/555769 -- Ubuntu

A preventative fix for bug 557177 (the ... erased all my data in / one)

2010-04-08 Thread Gavin Panella
I read mdz's post http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/04/08/a-story-in-numbers/ and saw the one line fix: -cd ${MOUNTPOINT} +cd ${MOUNTPOINT:?mount point not specified} and wondered if there might be a better long-term preventative fix for this: run all init scripts with set -o errexit -o

Re: Qt Creator major bug

2010-04-07 Thread Charlie Kravetz
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:37:38 +0200 Ioannis Vranos cppdevelo...@ontelecoms.gr wrote: OS: Ubuntu 9.10 x64. Qt Creator has a major show-stopper bug, it can't run an application whe the Run button is pressed. See the screenshot attached. Thank you, and the bug number

Re: File a new bug or re-open an old one

2010-03-30 Thread Bruce Miller
...@ubuntu.com To: Bruce Miller subscr...@brmiller.ca Cc: Ubuntu developer list ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Sent: Mon, March 29, 2010 11:36:56 AM Subject: Re: File a new bug or re-open an old one On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Bruce Miller ymailto=mailto:subscr...@brmiller.ca

Re: File a new bug or re-open an old one

2010-03-29 Thread C de-Avillez
would say that you are raising a point that *can* be discussed here. But usually, for bug management, ubuntu-bugsq...@lists.ubuntu.com or ubuntu-bugcont...@lists.launchpad.net are the ideal MLs. snip/ The focus of this message is one bug which the Apport retracer on Launchpad tagged

A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-03-26 Thread Bill Lee
First of all, as a foreign English speaker, I may not be able to express myself complete. If you have difficult understand this mail, I feel sorry. I ran Ubuntu 10.04 on Virtual Box OSE, and find that the ACPI part of Linux Ubuntu 10.04 cannot work with Virtual Box OSE. System will hold up when

Re: A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-03-26 Thread Bill Lee
is running in Ubuntu 9.10 and its version is '3.0.8_OSE r53138'. Ubuntu 9.10 can work with this version of Virtual Box. So I think this problem can be sovled. I wish Lucid LTS will become better. Best wishes, Bill Lee This is a known bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox

Re: A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-03-26 Thread Bruno Girin
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 18:07 +0530, Chandru wrote: You seem to have been bitten by this Virtualbox bug. http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/6100 The fix is available in the Lucid's Virtualbox . Yes but that's not much use for people who use Karmic and want to test drive Lucid in a VM to make

ubuntu-bug reports too much;

2010-03-19 Thread Rene Veerman
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/541875 ubuntu-bug auto-attached these files; * BootDmesg.txt (49.8 KiB, text/plain; charset=utf-8) * CurrentDmesg.txt (2.1 KiB, text/plain; charset=utf-8) * Dependencies.txt (4.6 KiB, text/plain; charset=utf-8

Re: ubuntu-bug reports too much;

2010-03-19 Thread Alan Pope
On 19 March 2010 12:55, Rene Veerman rene7...@gmail.com wrote: by the looks of it i can't even delete 'm from launchpad.. :S You can. On the right hand side see Bug attachments. Click 'edit' next to the one you want to delete then click Delete attachment button. Cheers, Al. -- Ubuntu-devel

Re: ubuntu-bug reports too much;

2010-03-19 Thread Sense Hofstede
On 19 March 2010 13:55, Rene Veerman rene7...@gmail.com wrote: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/541875 ubuntu-bug auto-attached these files;    *   BootDmesg.txt  (49.8 KiB, text/plain; charset=utf-8)    * CurrentDmesg.txt (2.1 KiB, text/plain; charset=utf-8

Bug: python2.5-minimal

2010-03-18 Thread mail2george
Hi All I am using this list for my bug report because using ubuntu-bug did not work. I could not establish a connection to the bug database (continuous errors). My bug report is as follows: Richte python2.5-minimal ein (2.5.4-1ubuntu6.1) ... Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime

Re: Bug: python2.5-minimal

2010-03-18 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 15 March 2010 15:48, mail2geo...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: Hi All I am using this list for my bug report because using ubuntu-bug did not work. I could not establish a connection to the bug database (continuous errors). You can try https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug in your

Re: Bug: python2.5-minimal

2010-03-18 Thread Soren Hansen
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:48:55PM +0100, mail2geo...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: I have done something wrong using ths list for my bug report, please let me know. I can only do better if I know that something is wrong. This list is not for bug reports. There should be a way for you to file the bug

Re: Bug: python2.5-minimal

2010-03-18 Thread Brian Murray
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:34:28AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: On 15 March 2010 15:48, mail2geo...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: Hi All I am using this list for my bug report because using ubuntu-bug did not work. I could not establish a connection to the bug database (continuous errors

Possible Bindwood Bug?

2010-02-24 Thread James Tait
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm working on an extension for Thunderbird to sync its contacts with DesktopCouch. It's based heavily on the Bindwood code. In the course of my poking around, I noticed the following lines in sync.js (from line 101): // create a

RE: ubuntu-bug (was Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?)

2010-02-20 Thread Ethan Baldridge
Even if you have X, another problem is that ubuntu-bug and apport ignore the $(HTTP_PROXY|http_proxy) variable, so it becomes very difficult to file bugs from work if you're behind a non-transparent proxy. -Original Message- From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com

ubuntu-bug (was Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?)

2010-02-15 Thread Patrick Goetz
Subject: Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF? From: Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:49:58 -0800 The ReportingBugs wiki page also has a section about Filing bugs when off-line which discusses how to use apport-cli to save a report that you can then report from

Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Patrick Goetz
I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have regressed considerably. First of all, there is no longer any clear indication on the front page of bugs.launchpad.net about how one goes about filing a bug

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Charlie Kravetz
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:17:47 -0600 Patrick Goetz pgo...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have regressed considerably. First of all, there is no longer any clear

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Brian Murray
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:17:47PM -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote: I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have regressed considerably. First of all, there is no longer any clear indication on the front

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Mario Vukelic
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:47 -0700, Charlie Kravetz wrote: Having used all these methods to file bugs, I have never been stopped from commenting on the bug report before all of the automatic methods attached the log files and filled in commentary. I think the problem is that ubuntu-bug excepts

bug libapache2-mod-php5 5.2.10.dfsg.1-2ubuntu6.3

2010-01-14 Thread Paweł Bielecki
to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i486-linux-gnu. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/... Reading symbols from /usr/sbin/apache2

Re: Midnight Commander: bug report and patch

2010-01-10 Thread Ben Okopnik
Hi, Daniel - On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:25:25AM -0500, Daniel Chen wrote: On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ben Okopnik b...@linuxgazette.net wrote: I tried reporting this bug in Launchpad more about a week back, and never got any response. Since it's a pretty big one (zip file contents

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Robbie Williamson rob...@ubuntu.com wrote: Is it a bug that we don't automatically enable and password protect your screensaver in Ubuntu? Maybe. or that we don't automatically encrypt all your data? Maybe. Perhaps you will get farther opening a bug

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 06.01.2010 um 11:36 schrieb Patrick Freundt: ... but maybe Gentoo and other source based distributions are going to have a revival and Canonical is discovered as the new Microsoft. Patrick, just a week ago you defended Ubuntu so much and now you play with going away? Doesn't match my

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote: What to do now? Battle again, how we used to battle proprietary software once. Because many people had good reasons to dislike proprietary software. And whats happening here is that companies mix Free Software with the old,

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2010-01-06 11:36:09 +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote: We dont talk about an unpleasant background color or desired or unwanted functionality. We talk about a default configuration of a browser that goes online to download data without my consent. And the very least to expect is that its

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Michael Bienia mich...@bienia.de wrote: You know that your Ubuntu systems also checks for package updates automatically? So it goes online without your consent too. As I said before, firefox is just one exaple of multiple topics. And I don't want a dialog

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Shentino
I've sorta had this dance with a problem in mc that, due to improper perms on cons.saver, prevented the usage of C-o to flop the screen in and out. I uploaded a patch that highlighted the problem and I thought that someone would eventually get around to testing it. Unfortunately, it recently got

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Daniel Chen
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Shentino shent...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, it recently got the wave-off as now it no longer builds under Lucid and I'm being asked to test a new upstream version, when I know that I uploaded 3:4.7.0-1ubuntu1 last night, so if you're willing to respin your

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Chen seven.st...@gmail.com wrote: your patch Right, I often forget about that ... You should not only rant at people like Richard Stallman you also need to provide patches like him. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Daniel Chen
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Patrick Freundt patrick.freu...@googlemail.com wrote: You should not only rant at people like Richard Stallman you also need to provide patches like him. I'll ask because the phrasing is ambiguous, and I can't tell whether my cynicism radar is errant. Are you

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Daniel Chen seven.st...@gmail.com wrote: I'll ask because the phrasing is ambiguous, and I can't tell whether my cynicism radar is errant. Pure self irony from my side, as I was looking over the thread that I started, realizing that I often forgot about the

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-06 Thread Benjamin Drung
on Gentoo, with the same version I was being asked to test. You are talking about bug #367318? It was me, who commented on this bug report. Let me clarify some points: * I never wrote that the bug is invalid or does not exist. I just unsubscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors. * I was processing your

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread Brian Murray
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote: To avoid misunderstandings I would like to ask the list in a bit more detailed kind of way for the proper procedure regarding bug reports, - because I am lacking official feedback regarding bug #500601, and on the one side I am

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com wrote: A good first step after reporting a new bug report is finding another Ubuntu user who can recreate the bug report and subsequently confirm it and set the bug's status to Confirmed. So bug reporting requires a form of social

proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Remco remc...@gmail.com wrote: You can start a topic on ubuntuforums.org if you're not comfortable with IRC. Just so I get this straight - you aswell as Brian Murray suggest, that bug reporting can not be handled within launchpad alone, and instead I should wear

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread Patrick Freundt
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com wrote: Bug reporting does not require[s] a form of social network as the bug was properly reported without one.  Rather to move the bug along the triaging process usually requires other people to look at it and indicate whether

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread C de-Avillez
On 01/05/2010 02:56 PM, Patrick Freundt wrote: On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Remco remc...@gmail.com wrote: You can start a topic on ubuntuforums.org if you're not comfortable with IRC. Just so I get this straight - you aswell as Brian Murray suggest, that bug reporting can

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 22:32 +0100 schrieb Patrick Freundt: Then the classic developer guy who tries to tell me at first the problem does not exist. He couldn't reproduce it. Not existing and not reproducible are two different pairs of shoes. You can only proof the existence of bug

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread Robbie Williamson
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 22:32 +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote: On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com wrote: Bug reporting does not require[s] a form of social network as the bug was properly reported without one. Rather to move the bug along the triaging process

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-05 Thread Joao Pinto
and wipes it all out with a quicky: this is only desire and not a bug, classified invalid. *BANG* The mysterious guy from Portugal (myself) is one of the thousand mysterious guys which participates on Free Software and Ubuntu. I wish you the best luck finding someone who matters . About the problem

Re: Midnight Commander: bug report and patch

2010-01-05 Thread Daniel Chen
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ben Okopnik b...@linuxgazette.net wrote: I tried reporting this bug in Launchpad more about a week back, and never got any response. Since it's a pretty big one (zip file contents not showing up), I figured I'd send it here; hopefully, someone finds it helpful

Midnight Commander: bug report and patch

2010-01-04 Thread Ben Okopnik
Hi, all - I tried reporting this bug in Launchpad more about a week back, and never got any response. Since it's a pretty big one (zip file contents not showing up), I figured I'd send it here; hopefully, someone finds it helpful! The problem was caused by the regex in /usr/share/mc/extfs/uzip

kernel-package: bug: The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h does not match current version

2010-01-04 Thread Kirill Afonshin
I have this problem on Karmic with the latest linux kernel from git. Now the header is in include/generated/utsrelease.h. Please correct version_vars.mk. Kirill Afonshin -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

RE: Midnight Commander: bug report and patch

2010-01-04 Thread Chris Jones
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:37:30 -0500 From: Ben Okopnik b...@linuxgazette.net Subject: Midnight Commander: bug report and patch To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Message-ID: 20091224163730.ga6...@linuxgazette.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, all - I tried

proper procedure regarding bug reports

2010-01-04 Thread Patrick Freundt
To avoid misunderstandings I would like to ask the list in a bit more detailed kind of way for the proper procedure regarding bug reports, - because I am lacking official feedback regarding bug #500601, and on the one side I am aware that we had christmas and new year celebrations, people

Bug #71870 - won't fix???

2009-12-26 Thread paul Hartman
I ran into a problem with my log files growing really huge. I went to launch pad to file a bug about it and found that it had already been filed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysklogd/+bug/71870 Under status it is listed as won't fix. Why would this be? Please forgive me if i

Re: Bug #71870 - won't fix???

2009-12-26 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 26.12.2009 um 17:50 schrieb paul Hartman: I ran into a problem with my log files growing really huge. I went to launch pad to file a bug about it and found that it had already been filed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysklogd/+bug/ 71870 Under status it is listed

Re: Bug #71870 - won't fix???

2009-12-26 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 17:15 +, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote: 2009/12/26 paul Hartman 276...@gmail.com: I ran into a problem with my log files growing really huge. I went to launch pad to file a bug about it and found that it had already been filed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source

Re: Bug #71870 - won't fix???

2009-12-26 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2009/12/26 paul Hartman 276...@gmail.com: I ran into a problem with my log files growing really huge. I went to launch pad to file a bug about it and found that it had already been filed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysklogd/+bug/71870 Under status it is listed as won't fix. Why

pygtk bug since jaunty

2009-12-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygtk/+bug/396791 Could anybody fix this bug? Do you need some information? regards Gianfranco -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

Re: pygtk bug since jaunty

2009-12-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
bug since jaunty The status on the bug has been set to incomplete, meaning more information is needed before the bug can be fixed. 2009/12/10 Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygtk/+bug/396791 Could anybody fix this bug? Do you need

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-09 Thread Chris Jones
Hi On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 23:06 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: bug comments, that seems to be ia32-libs-tools (the source package which That package is only in Jaunty, not in Karmic because it seems to have been removed from Debian for being a poor, fragile solution to the problem that multiarch

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-09 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:30 -0800, Brendan Miller wrote: This bug more or less makes apt-get unusable on 64 bit systems and has been in for a long time now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/402833 Is this still a problem in Karmic? I don't have that file on my system, and a search

Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases

2009-12-09 Thread Benjamin Drung
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com * Package name: release Version : 0.1 (native) Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com * License : GPL v3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : provides information about the

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-09 Thread C de-Avillez
Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:30 -0800, Brendan Miller wrote: This bug more or less makes apt-get unusable on 64 bit systems and has been in for a long time now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/402833 Is this still a problem in Karmic? I don't have that file

Re: Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases

2009-12-09 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com * Package name: release Version : 0.1 (native) Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com * License : GPL v3+ Programming

Re: Bug#559761: ITP: release -- provides information about the current releases

2009-12-09 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/12/9 Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.us: On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com * Package name    : release   Version         : 0.1 (native)   Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com *

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-09 Thread Brendan Miller
: Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:30 -0800, Brendan Miller wrote: This bug more or less makes apt-get unusable on 64 bit systems and has been in for a long time now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/402833 Is this still a problem in Karmic?  I don't have that file on my system

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-09 Thread C de-Avillez
Brendan Miller wrote: Ah, Ok. I haven't updated any of my systems to 9.10, so I didn't realize that 32 bit compatibility had been removed... Given that, I probably just won't update since it would break adobe air and all my third party stuff... I am afraid there is a misunderstanding

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-09 Thread Brendan Miller
Ohhkay. I've always been pretty unclear on exactly what packages I needed to get 32 bit compat for various programs. There's a script that's been floating around in the forums forever that automatically downloads 32 bit dependencies for a third party program on a 64 bit system. getlibs:

Subject: Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-09 Thread Davyd McColl
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:00:21 Brendan Miller catph...@catphive.net wrote: Ah, Ok. I haven't updated any of my systems to 9.10, so I didn't realize that 32 bit compatibility had been removed... Given that, I probably just won't update since it would break adobe air and all my third party

is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-08 Thread Brendan Miller
This bug more or less makes apt-get unusable on 64 bit systems and has been in for a long time now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/402833 On a side note, I have no idea how to bring bugs to the attention of developers, or if it is even possible, as this bug has sat in the bugtracker

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-08 Thread Brendan Miller
This is an organizational problem. Waving hands and saying the community should do it is nice if it works, but it obviously hasn't happened. I personally would feel much more happy if you email also included a patch... Well than why is there a public bug tracker if you guys just want patches

Re: is anyone ever going to fix this major bug?

2009-12-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
this is through the sponsorship process (bug management via mailing list doesn't scale). If the ubuntu-universe-sponsors team were subscribed to the bug, then a developer would review it. In short, yes we do look at bugs, but we also need help. Scott K -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel

Re: Launchpad Bug Filing Changes for Ubuntu + reporter's thoughts

2009-11-18 Thread André Pirard
on staging.launchpad.net already and will be landing shortly on edge.launchpad.net(*). If you review the specification and the documentation bug reporters will be redirected to, you will notice that we spent a lot of time and energy on ensuring that we improve the quality of bugs when

Re: Announcing the Next Ubuntu Bug Day! - Thursday 05 November 2009

2009-11-11 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
ti., 03.11.2009 kl. 13.33 -0300, skrev Pedro Villavicencio Garrido: Fellow Ubuntu Triagers! This week's Bug Day target is *drum roll please* Gwibber! * 61 New Bugs need a hug * 7 Incomplete Bugs need a status check * 17 Confirmed Bugs need a review Bookmark it, add it to your

Bug or feature on the Clock

2009-11-04 Thread Alarcón Vladimir
Hi, I don't know if this is the right thread to post a missing feature I've found. when I you click on the clock that appears by default in Ubuntu 9.04 9.10, it shows you a calendar where weeks start on Sunday (thru Saturday). That's fine for English, but in Spanish (maybe other languages

Re: Bug or feature on the Clock

2009-11-04 Thread Andrew SB
that begin the week on Mondays should have first_weekday 2 GNOME's calendar applet should follow these settings. If the locale setting for your culture is wrong, please file a bug against the langpack-locales package. Thanks! - Andrew -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: python-qt4 pyuic4 bug in ubuntu 8.04 LTS

2009-11-03 Thread Guillaume Baty
://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/software/pyqt/download (bottom of the page). Hope this helps! :) --Matt R Ok, thank you very much for your answer. I know the bug I'm talking about is fixed in earlier than 4.7 python-qt release (4.4 I think) When you say the official release you mean next 8.04 LTS

python-qt4 pyuic4 bug in ubuntu 8.04 LTS

2009-11-02 Thread Guillaume Baty
Hi, I'm developping a GUI using PyQt4, Qt4 and qt designer. I ask my question here because my bug seems to be specific to ubuntu 8.04 PyQt4 version. I hope asking my question in the good list. My widget in designer (see attach) use a GridLayout. I use pyuic4 (pyqt4-devel-tools) to generate

Re: python-qt4 pyuic4 bug in ubuntu 8.04 LTS

2009-11-02 Thread MattR
Guillaume Baty wrote: Hi, I'm developping a GUI using PyQt4, Qt4 and qt designer. I ask my question here because my bug seems to be specific to ubuntu 8.04 PyQt4 version. I hope asking my question in the good list. My widget in designer (see attach) use a GridLayout. I use pyuic4 (pyqt4

Bug in Ubuntu One - where and how to report it

2009-10-31 Thread Ioannis Vranos
previously. Where an I fill a bug report for it? Thank you a lot, -- Ioannis Vranos C95 / C++03 Software Developer http://www.cpp-software.net -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman

Re: Launchpad Bug Filing Changes for Ubuntu

2009-10-18 Thread Kirk
://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs. This change has been tested on staging.launchpad.net already and will be landing shortly on edge.launchpad.net(*). If you review the specification and the documentation bug reporters will be redirected to, you will notice that we spent a lot of time and energy

Re: Announcing the Next Ubuntu Bug Day! - Thursday 08 October 2009

2009-10-13 Thread Lane Lester
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Pedro Villavicencio Garrido pe...@ubuntu.com wrote: Bookmark it, add it to your calendars, turn over those egg-timers! * Thursday 08 October 2009 I received this email October 9, so I won't get to report the broken install of *Xubuntu* Karmic beta. But maybe

Re: Could someone explain a Won't Fix bug resolution re ubuntu-boot-experience?

2009-10-10 Thread Jonathan Ernst
Hello, Le mardi 06 octobre 2009 à 14:12 -0500, Robbie Williamson a écrit : [...] 2) Relocate your console messages from tty1 to tty6 - sudo vi /etc/default/grub - Add console=tty6 to GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT: quiet splash console=tty6 - save and quit - sudo update-grub [...] Why

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >