Re: UIMA report is due

Tommaso Teofili wrote: > I never wrote that report before, but if nobody else comes out I volunteer > (maybe I'll ask some help here and there to gather all the informations). > +1 for begin the graduation process after the 2.3.0 release. > Tommaso > Great, Thanks Tommaso! Please start by cutt

Re: UIMA report is due

Tommaso Teofili wrote: > 2009/10/13 Marshall Schor > > >> Tommaso Teofili wrote: >> >>> I never wrote that report before, but if nobody else comes out I >>> >> volunteer >> >>> (maybe I'll ask some help her

Re: UIMA report is due

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Tommaso Teofili wrote: >> I've just updated the wiki. >> Let me know if there is something else to mention that comes in your >> mind. >> > "The Configurable Feature Editor, including documentation, was > refreshed, and will be included in the next release. " > > Isn't i

uima, uima-as, and Sandbox distr now at level 2.3.0-incubating, without -SNAPSHOT

Please update your checked-out projects from SVN. I did a build on all three, and also did the assemblies, and they all now seem to be working. After one last pass at getting Jira issues closed, it will be time to make a release candidate, I think :-) . -Marshall

normal things in the build that look like errors

The Assembly steps have specified that the resulting assemblies are not to be uploaded to the maven repos (by saying to *not* attach the assemblies to the output artifact). This causes maven (apparently) to issue a WARNING message: Assembly file: C:\UIMA\WorkspaceUima\uimaj-distr\target\uimaj-2.3.

Re: UIMA-AS client dependencies

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a small UIMA AS clients which is build with maven, > it depends on uimaj-core, uimaj-as-core and uimj-as-activemq. > > The list of dependencies is very long and I wonder it > that is really necessary, since I have to run > this little tool on a serve

Re: UIMA-AS client dependencies

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I have a small UIMA AS clients which is build with maven, >>> it depends on uimaj-core, uimaj-as-core and uimj-as-activemq. >>> >>&

Re: UIMA-AS client dependencies

I took a look at the dependencies for the uimaj-as-activemq project, using the tools: mvn dependency:analyze and mvn dependency:tree and here's what I found. 1) uimaj-examples is a testing dependency - I'll change the . 2) There are some dependencies coded in what appears to be a strange way. Her

Re: UIMA report is due

Marshall Schor wrote: > Tommaso Teofili wrote: > >> I never wrote that report before, but if nobody else comes out I volunteer >> (maybe I'll ask some help here and there to gather all the informations). >> +1 for begin the graduation process after

Issues not closed for 2.3.0 release

Hi everyone, I'm "itching" to get the 2.3.0 release done. Of the issues that are open, reopened, or in-progress, most are now being deferred to past this release. The ones left that may need to be worked on before the release is done include: (Joern) UIMA-1619

Re: Issues not closed for 2.3.0 release

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > >> (Joern) UIMA-1619 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1619> >> Clarify that a Cas Editor Project is required to use the Cas Editor in >> the documentation <https:

Re: Issues not closed for 2.3.0 release

The basic issue seems to be that part of the initialization sequence for logging is not finding a handler class. The basic "fix" for this seems to be to arrange that the class for the handler be found in the initial application class path. This is what the "System" class path seems to mean (taken

Re: Issues not closed for 2.3.0 release

Thilo Goetz wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: > [...] > >> Both of these approaches put uimaj-core classes at the "root" level of >> the application (i.e., "System") class-loader chain. I can't think of >> any cases where that would not be O

Re: Issues not closed for 2.3.0 release

Marshall Schor wrote: > Thilo Goetz wrote: > >> Marshall Schor wrote: >> [...] >> >> >>> Both of these approaches put uimaj-core classes at the "root" level of >>> the application (i.e., "System") class-loader ch

Re: Issues not closed for 2.3.0 release

lection is needed. Now to get this tested :-) -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: > >> Thilo Goetz wrote: >> >> >>> Marshall Schor wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> >>> >>>> Both

Re: Issues not closed for 2.3.0 release

Marshall Schor wrote: > Here's my current better(?) thought that avoids injecting and doesn't > presume the SystemClassLoader is a subclass of URLClassLoader, and > avoids permission issues that could arise in some environments when > later adding to the URL set via addURL(

Use of JMS and SOAP clients within UIMA-AS

In reviewing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-959, it says that JMS and Vinci can be used within an uima-as aggregate marked async="false", but fail if async="true". The documentation has since been updated to say that vinci services cannot be used with uima-as because they don't preserv

Can these issues marked "resolved" be closed?

Hi - I would appreciate everyone's help in determining if the issues below, marked "resolved", can be closed. Jerry UIMA-874 Service hangs when trying to reply to a local reply queue on a client that has disappeared.

Re: Use of JMS and SOAP clients within UIMA-AS

ve the same issue as above, unless that has been fixed? -Marshall > Vinci services should still be broken for uima-as clients. > > Eddie > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > >> In reviewing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-959, it says

Cas Editor POM questions

While reviewing the Eclipse tooling, I noticed that the POM for the Cas Editor has a dependency on org.eclipse.swt org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86 If this dependency is removed, there are a lot of compile errors. But because this dependency is on something with "win32" and "x86" in the name, doe

Re: Cas Editor POM questions

Marshall Schor wrote: > While reviewing the Eclipse tooling, I noticed that the POM for the Cas > Editor has a dependency on > > org.eclipse.swt > org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86 > > If this dependency is removed, there are a lot of compile errors. > > But because this

Re: Cas Editor POM questions

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > >> Another question: I think the dependency >> >> >> junit >> junit >> 4.5 >> >> >> should have test - is this OK if I change this? >> > I cannot recall the exact reason its done like this, I will find out if > the scope can be changed to test.

Re: Use of JMS and SOAP clients within UIMA-AS

Eddie Epstein wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > >> Eddie Epstein wrote: >> >>> A JMS service is just a UIMA AS service, so no limitations with uima-as >>> aggregates. >>> >> Sorry, I was no

is there a release of the UIMA support for open-nlp that we can link to?

I went to the opennlp home page and looked around for mentions of UIMA - didn't see any - but may have missed something. Is there documentation / downloads etc. that can be linked to at this point, or not yet? -Marshall

time for the frist release candidate

I'm aware of one more change coming in tomorrow to the regEx annotator, and then, after that, I think we're ready to build uima, uima-as, and uima sandbox releases. I plan to do the final update to the release notes and tag the release, sometime tomorrow. Please let me know of any issues with thi

Re: Using failover in broker URL causes XML exception

Hi Jörn - this looks like another character pair "(" and ")" has to be added to the bit of fixup code that creates a name from this parameter. Can you put in a Jira for this? I think I can fix it before the other open issue closes :-) -Marshall Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi, > > in the deployment

Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-1647) Scripts fail to call runUimaClass.sh

ables before calling runUimaClass. For instance, cvd.sh and deploytool.sh -Marshall > -Burn. > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Marshall Schor (JIRA) < > uima-dev@incubator.apache.org> wrote: > > >>[ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1647?pa

order of classpath entries for deploytool

The deploytool (used to deploy soap annotators) formerly had a classpath which started with %CATALINA_HOME%\webapps\axis\WEB-INF\classes. After the refactoring to use a common script, this path entry will now follow %UIMA_CLASSPATH%, and core UIMA, and ActiveMQ (if %ACTIVEMQ_HOME% is set), and %CA

Re: order of classpath entries for deploytool

strange classpath to be added if CATALINA_HOME wasn't defined). That's what I'm trying to find out if it is OK. -Marshall > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > > >> The deploytool (used to deploy soap annotators) formerly had a classpath >&g

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1651) We should remove runRemoteAsyncAEmultiple.cmd

Burn Lewis (JIRA) wrote: > We should remove runRemoteAsyncAEmultiple.cmd > - > > Key: UIMA-1651 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1651 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug >

doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning. Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the release before then, or ask for a short delay if needed... -Marshall

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and >> hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning. >> Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the >> releas

Re: doing 2.3.0 RC1 - tomorrow morning?

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Unless I hear some objections, I would like to tag the first (and >> hopefully only :-) ) release candidate for 2.3.0 tomorrow morning. >> Please get any fixes finished up that you would like to get into the >> releas

Apache Uima 2.3.0-incubating release candidate 01

The release candidate 01 for 2.3.0-incubating is on http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC1/ It has 4 parts: uimaj - the main uima release uima-as - the uima-as add on uima-sandbox - the sandbox components being released uima-cpp - the C++ release, including several bina

Re: Apache Uima 2.3.0-incubating release candidate 01

Thilo Goetz wrote: > On 11/13/2009 04:53, Marshall Schor wrote: >> The release candidate 01 for 2.3.0-incubating is on >> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC1/ >> >> It has 4 parts: >> >> uimaj - the main uima release >>

Re: Apache Uima 2.3.0-incubating release candidate 01

Looks like a bug - investigating... -Marshall Thilo Goetz wrote: > On 11/13/2009 04:53, Marshall Schor wrote: >> The release candidate 01 for 2.3.0-incubating is on >> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC1/ >> >> It has 4 parts: >>

Re: Apache Uima 2.3.0-incubating release candidate 01

Marshall Schor wrote: > Looks like a bug - investigating... -Marshall > Here's a work-around: Edit the file %UIMA_HOME%\bin\runUimaClass.bat replace the line: @if "%UIMA_CVDMAN%"=="" set UIMA_CVDMAN=-Duima.tools.cvd.manpath.notset with @if not defi

Re: [Apache UIMA 2.3 RC] - Missing Eclipse fragment "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" ?

Tong Fin wrote: > It looks like we don't have the Eclipse fragment > "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" which is required by the > Deployment Descriptor Editor. > I see it in eclipsePlugins directory of my test dir built by unzipping the uimaj binary distribution, and then the ui

Re: [Apache UIMA 2.3 RC] - Missing Eclipse fragment "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" ?

Tong Fin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > > >> Tong Fin wrote: >> >>> It looks like we don't have the Eclipse fragment >>> "org.apache.uima.runtime.fragments.deployeditor" which is required by the >

an interesting svn search page

This page http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?view=plot&path=%2Fincubator%2Fuima&kind=day&kind=week&plotsort=%24plotsort is part of a general svn search that includes many repositories, including the ASF. I got to this page by drilling down from http://svnsearch.org/ 1) pick ASF Repo

2.3.0 release candidate 2 is up and ready for testing

The uima-cpp release didn't change, so it is still found under 2.3.0-RC1. The url is http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC2/ Included this time is an eclipse-update-site - it should work for testing this release, but it doesn't incorporate older releases, like the real

testing rc-2

We invite all who are following this list to download and test release candidate 2. Please visit the wiki page http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/TestPlan2.3.0 and edit it as needed. A good practice: if you decide to test something (say, for instance, the install on a MAC platform),

Re: How to avoid message localization failed ?

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hello, > > on our sever message localization always fails with this error message: > MESSAGE LOCALIZATION FAILED: Can't find bundle for base name > jms_adapter_messages, locale en_DK > > This is a little annoying because even in case it fails it should just > use english er

Re: testing rc-2

Tommaso Teofili wrote: > added myself for testing base rc2 package on Mac. > Tommaso > Great!, Thanks. -Marshall > 2009/11/17 Marshall Schor > > >> We invite all who are following this list to download and test release >> candidate 2. >> &

Re: UIMA @ IKS-project

Nice report, Tommaso. Maybe we can also add this to our website in the "events and conferences" area? -Marshall Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hi all, > back from 2nd IKS [1] Workshop last friday in Rome where I had a speech/demo > about UIMA and Semantic Search. > It's been a nice experience and I wo

Re: How to avoid message localization failed ?

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> on our sever message localization always fails with this error message: >>> MESSAGE LOCALIZATION FAILED: Can't find bundle for base name >>

Re: How to avoid message localization failed ?

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> Marshall Schor wrote: >>> Jörn Kottmann wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> on our sever message localization always fails with this error >>>> message: >>>>

Re: UIMA AS client cannot deserialize exception when running in an OSGI server

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hi, > > I am doing some error testing and noticed that in case the client gets > an exception > from a worker node it may fail to deserialize the exception when > running in an OSGI server, > here is the error: > > [2009-11-18 14:57:00.689] ActiveMQ Session > Task

Re: Need help for aggregate engine

Hi Antonella, I think you will get better response if you move this to the uima-user list. Can you please post some details there of what the errors are? -Marshall Antonella Laterza wrote: > Hi everyone! > I'm really new to UIMA and I need some help! :-) > I have to develop a plugin for the Jaz

Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-1649) deployAsyncService.sh log4j warnings

Jörn Kottmann (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779685#action_12779685 > ] > > Jörn Kottmann commented on UIMA-1649: > - > > I kind

Re: UIMA AS console input

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Press 'q'+'Enter' to quiesce and stop the service or 's'+'Enter' to > stop it now. > Note: selected option is not echoed on the console. > > On Ubuntu Linux it is echoed to the console (connected via ssh to the > machine). How nice :-)... I guess we need to say "Note: sel

Please try and do Documentation Review over the weekend

I hope to build RC-3 which I hope we can go out with, early next week. Thanks for everyone's testing and feedback! -Marshall

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1676) Regex: pear install.xml is missing 2 of the 3 jar files

Thilo Goetz wrote: > Er, I see that this is now all maven based. I have > no idea how to add the missing jars. Over to you, > Marshall. OK - will do... -Marshall > > --Thilo > > On 11/23/2009 14:45, Thilo Goetz wrote: >> This is probably a regression from >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1676) Regex: pear install.xml is missing 2 of the 3 jar files

around not breaking older pear files with our changes... -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > Thilo Goetz wrote: > >> Er, I see that this is now all maven based. I have >> no idea how to add the missing jars. Over to you, >> Marshall. >> > OK - will do... > &

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1676) Regex: pear install.xml is missing 2 of the 3 jar files

n a manner where this is not happening? -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > Well, this may be due to a misunderstanding on my part. The issue is > around what files get added *automatically* to the class path in various > situations. > > I know we made a change to remove automatic a

Question on use of remoteReplyQueueScaleout for colocated delegates

Eddie Epstein wrote: > ... > -"remoteReplyQueueScaleout" - reply queue scaleout is also tunable for > colocated delegates. > Does it use this same parameter ? Is there a reason / need to scaleout in the colocated delegate case (I thought the main reason to scale-out was to parallelize CAS des

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1676) Regex: pear install.xml is missing 2 of the 3 jar files

Thilo Goetz wrote: > On 11/23/2009 15:47, Marshall Schor wrote: >> A little more investigation: I think what is supposed to happen is that >> the "install" process for the pear ends up calling >> buildComponentClassPath in the InstallationController, which shou

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1676) Regex: pear install.xml is missing 2 of the 3 jar files

ould change the documentation to say ... there is no need to specify Class Path entries for Jars in the lib directory, when using the Eclipse plugin pear packager or the Maven Pear Packager. Opinions? -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > Thilo Goetz wrote: > >> On 11/23/2009

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1676) Regex: pear install.xml is missing 2 of the 3 jar files

Thilo Goetz wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: > >> Looking at a previous thread: >> http://markmail.org/thread/xrv7qormkenc4hxd I now remember we have made >> a change in the behavior to require explicitly listing all the jars in >> the install.xml file. We t

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1676) Regex: pear install.xml is missing 2 of the 3 jar files

Marshall Schor wrote: > Thilo Goetz wrote: > >> Marshall Schor wrote: >> >> >>> Looking at a previous thread: >>> http://markmail.org/thread/xrv7qormkenc4hxd I now remember we have made >>> a change in the behavior to require explicit

Release candidate 3 of 2.3.0 is now available

It is in the usual place, http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC3/ This is the final one, I think. Unless something serious comes up, I plan to call the release vote next Monday :-) ... -Marshall

Re: Release candidate 3 of 2.3.0 is now available

Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > >> It is in the usual place, >> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC3/ >> > > I finally got around to taking a look at the relea

Re: Release candidate 3 of 2.3.0 is now available

Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: >> >>> The signing key was uploaded to the MIT public server quite a while >>>

Re: Release candidate 3 of 2.3.0 is now available

other top-level things we're releasing. Thanks again. -Marshall Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > >> Jukka Zitting wrote: >> >>> The biggest issue I stumbled over is the fact that the uimaj release

Re: Release candidate 3 of 2.3.0 is now available

Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > >> Thanks for the details! I will take a close look and polish up our >> build process to eliminate these. Some of these appear to be files we >> thought would only mak

Question on License files

We have had a practice of having different licenses for the "source" and "bin" distribution. The source distribution, consisting (usually) of just the sources in SVN, has just the Apache license, typically. The "bin" distribution has collected licenses beyond this, corresponding to the various li

Re: Release candidate 3 of 2.3.0 is now available

Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > >> Jukka Zitting wrote: >> >>> It should always be possible to recreate all the binaries from the >>> source package. See the last paragraph of >&

Redistributing javax.jms.xxx and javax.management.j2ee.xxx classes

Active MQ redistributes these classes, which seem to be part of the standard Sun Java release for J2EE. We, in turn, for uima-as, redistribute the main apache-activemq-4.1.1.jar, which in turn, contains these javax... classes, so uima-as is redistributing these. I'm having trouble finding out any

Re: Release candidate 3 of 2.3.0 is now available

Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Jukka Zitting wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: >>> >>>> Jukka Zitting wrote: >>>> >>>>> It

Re: Redistributing javax.jms.xxx and javax.management.j2ee.xxx classes

I posted a question about this on the ActiveMQ users-list. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > Active MQ redistributes these classes, which seem to be part of the > standard Sun Java release for J2EE. > > We, in turn, for uima-as, redistribute the main > apache-activemq-4.1.1.jar

Re: Redistributing javax.jms.xxx and javax.management.j2ee.xxx classes

I found that mx4j-2.2.1.jar, which is part of the binary distribution of uima-as, also has javax.management... classes. The website claims this jar is Apache 2.0 licensed (see http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/docs/ch01s06.html ). -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > I posted a question about this

[Fwd: Re: mx4j jar including javax.management... classes; activemq jar containing javax.management and javax.jms... classes - license question]

+ From: Mark Thomas Reply-To: legal-disc...@apache.org To: legal-disc...@apache.org References: <4b15535b.5050...@schor.com> Marshall Schor wrote: > The mx4j jar (used in many apache projects, including tomcat, geronimo, > ActiveMQ) claims to be licensed unde

Re: [Fwd: Re: mx4j jar including javax.management... classes; activemq jar containing javax.management and javax.jms... classes - license question]

eronimo mail archives. 2009/12/1 Marshall Schor http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26596551&i=0>> > > Hi - > > We're trying to figure out how to properly license a distribution where we > are including the apache-activemq-x.x.x.jar. > >

release candidate 05 is now posted at the usual place

Find it at http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC5/ except for the uima-cpp release, which remains under rc1 (it hasn't changed). (Release candidate 4 had RAT issues). The compare of the source export out of svn with our source distribution should be closer - but some d

Re: Need help with DictionaryAnnotator

Antonella Laterza wrote: > I'm using the deafult dictionary file, so it is in the default directory > (/DictionaryAnnotator/resources) and I set the datapath with > the absolute path of the file > (/DictionaryAnnotator/resources/dictionary.xml), as described > in the UIMA CDE Property Page. >

Re: [jira] Closed: (UIMA-1292) Uima AS Jms Listener Should Support Retry When Establishing Connection To a Broker

Jerry says this is a important fix to get into the release - so I'll do RC-6 (changes only for uima-as, no changes for the others). -Marshall Jerry Cwiklik (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

uima-as release candidate 6 now up on people.apache.org

Here: http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC6-uima-as/ This is the same as RC5 except for 1 bug fix UIMA-1292. Let's target a vote to release, this coming Monday? -Marshall

Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-1694) Error 'scm url cannot be null' on uimaj POM

Tommaso Teofili (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785945#action_12785945 > ] > > Tommaso Teofili commented on UIMA-1694: > --- > >

Re: Testing of Eclipse tooling

Tong Fin wrote: >> I tested the Eclipse tooling with Eclipse 3.4.2 and >> 3.5.1. I have some vague memory that we decided to >> drop Eclipse 3.3 support for this release, is that >> correct? >> I think that was 3.0 ;-) . UIMA 2.2.2 was tested with 3.2.x. See this thread: http://markmail.o

Building RC 7 for base UIMA and UIMA-AS (uima sandbox still at 05 level - no changes)

I am starting to update the release notes and build 07 candidates for base uima and uima-as, based on the fixes now closed in Jira. -Marshall

release candidate RC7 available

This candidate is located at http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC7/ and includes uimaj uima-as sandbox uimacpp (this is a rebuild by Eddie, copied from p.a.o/~eae, rel 02) eclipse-update-site Let's see if this one will make it ... :-) -Marshall

what was behind a lot of recent Jira "Updating" activity

We use the Jira "Release Notes" service to create the release-notes for our release; this in turn, depends on having the "Fixed in x" field correctly filled in. The many updates today to closed Jiras was due to a review of those, looking for cases where that field wasn't set, and then setting

[VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0 release candidate 7 as UIMA 2.3.0 incubating

release is digitally signed by Marshall Schor for all the components except for the C++ component, which is signed by Edward Epstein. Please vote on approving this release. This vote is for all 4 components, together. After the UIMA committers vote, we will ask the IPMC to vote. [ ] +1 Release RC7

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0 release candidate 7 as UIMA 2.3.0 incubating

+1 Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > This build consists of 4 major components: the core UIMA framework > (uimaj), the C++ enablement (uimacpp), the Asynchronous Scaleout > component (uima-as) and a set of annotators and other add-ons (sandbox). > > These have been through more t

build starting for RC 8 (except for Sandbox - no change since RC7)

I'm starting the build for uima and uima-as, rc 8. This mainly picks up the fixes for uima-as reconnect recoveries. The uima change is to remove trailing blanks in our logging properties files. I plan to copy the rc7 tag for the sandbox to the rc8 name, but not re-do it's build - since it's iden

2.3.0 release candidate 08 now on people.apache.org for review

This candidate is located at http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC8/ and includes uimaj uima-as sandbox (this is identical to RC7, it wasn't rebuilt) uimacpp (this is a rebuild by Eddie, hard-linked from p.a.o/~eae, rel 03) eclipse-update-site I'll start the

RC-9 plans

This RC will pick up the uima-as change 1712 and also include changes to copyright dates (now 2010 !) and publication dates for uimaj, uima-as, and sandbox releases. (Eddie - I guess you might want to do one for uima-cpp that reflects 2010, also. At the moment, I plan to build RC9 around January

digging into an issue with the Component Discriptor Editor (CDE) and RC8 with UIMA-AS components

A user has reported a CDE failure when editing a aggregate descriptor that contains references to remote uima-as services. The CDE attempts to acquire the remote services "metadata" to merge type system information, and fails, because of a ClassCastException: org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectio

Re: digging into an issue with the Component Discriptor Editor (CDE) and RC8 with UIMA-AS components

x27;s quite slow to open one of these descriptors): by being more intelligent about reusing resource managers, and just creating new ones if the classpath changes. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > A user has reported a CDE failure when editing a aggregate descriptor > that contains references

Re: digging into an issue with the Component Discriptor Editor (CDE) and RC8 with UIMA-AS components

Marshall Schor wrote: > A user has reported a CDE failure when editing a aggregate descriptor > that contains references to remote uima-as services. > > The CDE attempts to acquire the remote services "metadata" to merge type > system information, and fails, becaus

making uimaj-as-osgi-runtime problem-free in Eclipse

Currently, this project shows about 152 "Errors" in Eclipse - due to required bundles not being found. These errors can be suppressed by taking the 152 entries and adding them to the pom in the Felix bundle configuration section, with an element like: bsh;resolution:=opti

with luck, will try to build RC9 tomorrow

There are no changes to sandbox, so that won't be rebuilt (and it will have 2009 copyright date, reflecting the time it was built). I'll wait for Jörn to close or otherwise conclude UIMA-1674 per note from Jerry today. -Marshall

uima-2.3.0-RC9 available for testing

You can find it in the usual place: http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC9/ Let's put it thru some basics to insure the build didn't fail in some unusual way. Thanks. -Marshall

Re: uima-2.3.0-RC9 available for testing

eclipse update site installed OK (under windows); tested CDE and Deploy editor - both opened OK on samples in examples directory. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > You can find it in the usual place: > http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC9/ > > Let's

Re: uima-2.3.0-RC9 available for testing

tested: uima & uima-as install of binary, running cvd and documentAnalyzer, starting up a broker, and running the 3.4 Quick Test of uima-as from the uima-as readme - all OK. -Marshall Marshall Schor wrote: > You can find it in the usual place: > http://people.apache.org/~schor/ui

Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-1716) UIMA Sandbox components in tag 2.2.2 are 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT

Richard Eckart de Castilho (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796929#action_12796929 > ] > > Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-1716: > --

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for January 2010 ("UIMA Developers" )

Thanks, Tommaso. Other item to add: New committer voted in (Bhavani Iyer). -Marshall Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hi, > I'm going to add > >- 2.3.0-RC9 is out for testing >- > >UIMA and Semantic Search presentation at IKS 2nd workshop (see >http://wiki.iks-project.eu/index.php/2n

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for January 2010 ("UIMA Developers" )

Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote: > >> Would it be appropriate to say something like >> "getting ready for a graduation vote very soon" >> so the Board knows we're getting there and doesn't >> worry about us too much? >> > > Repeating from

[VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0 RC9 as UIMA 2.3.0 incubating

a partial version of the Eclipse Update Site for the Eclipse plugins, but is complete for the 2.3.0 release. The release is digitally signed by Marshall Schor for all the components except for the C++ component, which is signed by Edward Epstein. No new export control issues are needed for the compone

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0 RC9 as UIMA 2.3.0 incubating

Marshall Schor wrote: > This build keeps the uimacpp and sandbox components from the previous release > candidate (the download site on people.apache.org/~schor has hard links to the > previous artifacts - so they are guaranteed to be identical). > > We've had a few sanit

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >