@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: about using ofbiz as a platform
hmm...I compared the article and the latest code from trunk. I don't think
the diagram is consistent with codes.
For example, from the diagram party doesn't depend on marketing; however, as
I
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p948290.html
Sent from
:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p948290.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list
in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4
Hi Jacopo,
I was originally thinking about putting this stuff in the webtools until
I thought that user account management may be done by a user that is not
a system administrator (e.g. helpdesk level one support). Webtools
seems to be more system administration type stuff.
What are the pros
Hi Michael,
Does the framework just need user account and permission management? or,
does it need party/organisation management too?
Perhaps even using an external framework like ldap would be better for
managing the organisational structures, user accounts and permissions?
Cheers,
Chris
hi Chris,
I think account and permission management are enough for framework and
party/organization probably should not be in the scope of framework.
Using LDAP is definitely a good idea. But I think that should be only a
option, because not all customers have LDAP.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
hi Chris,
Not sure what kind of help you need for next step. I would love to help if I
can.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
www.wizitsoft.com
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Michael Xu (xudong)
dong...@wizitsoft.comwrote:
hi Chris,
I think account and permission management are enough for
On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Michael,
Does the framework just need user account and permission management? or,
does it need party/organisation management too?
The framework just needs user/security; parties, persons and organizations
cannot be referenced by the
Hi Michael,
We need to:
- decide whether to create a new component for managing accounts and
permissions or use webtools.
- decide on what content should go into these screens.
As mentioned by Jacopo, some of this may have already been done by Adrian:
Hi Christopher,
On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I was originally thinking about putting this stuff in the webtools until
I thought that user account management may be done by a user that is not
a system administrator (e.g. helpdesk level one support).
Hi Michael, Chris
As Scott said, I also wonder if Adrian did not begin something more open (Atlassian Crowd, etc.). I'd wait his answer because I
found only this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-811 related to specialpurpose/ldap
Jacques
() ascii ribbon campaign against HTML
I agree with Jacopo. Basically each ofbiz component can define its own admin
stuff (like user management in security). In terms of how to show those
stuff, that should be left to framework users. Maybe some users prefer to
aggregate all admin stuff from different components into webtools or
/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p948290.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Adrian,
Would there be any reason the work couldn't be done on trunk? I was
just thinking of the next release (whenever that is) being one step
closer to framework separation?
Many thanks,
Chris
Adrian Crum wrote:
The work I did is so old and out of date that it is probably unusable
by
The work would have to be done on the trunk. Releases only get bug fixes.
-Adrian
Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Would there be any reason the work couldn't be done on trunk? I was
just thinking of the next release (whenever that is) being one step
closer to framework separation?
Many
I've just tried commenting out all components except commonext on trunk.
I ran the ant tasks create-admin-user-login, then run and then tried to
access the url https://localhost:8443/webtools/
I received the following error message:
org.ofbiz.widget.screen.ScreenRenderException: Error
That looks like a good candidate for a Jira issue.
-Adrian
Christopher Snow wrote:
I've just tried commenting out all components except commonext on trunk.
I ran the ant tasks create-admin-user-login, then run and then tried to
access the url https://localhost:8443/webtools/
I received the
Adrian, thanks for the feedback - jira created OFBIZ-3329.
Adrian Crum wrote:
That looks like a good candidate for a Jira issue.
-Adrian
Christopher Snow wrote:
I've just tried commenting out all components except commonext on trunk.
I ran the ant tasks create-admin-user-login, then run
,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com
in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz
this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p948290.html
Sent
sense, as marketing is only an optional
component but party is a must.
What's the best practice for my case? Advices and clues will be very
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform
and clues will be very
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is only an optional
component but party is a must.
What's the best practice for my case? Advices and clues will be very
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
an
optional
component but party is a must.
What's the best practice for my case? Advices and clues will
be very
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz
in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p948290.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User
the best practice for my case? Advices and clues will be very
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Michael Xu
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/about-using-ofbiz-as-a-platform-tp786778p933001.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hi Bruno,
Thanks for your reply. I wish I could make it by myself. However, it turns
out too challenging for me. I think it is more piratical if one or more
committer could lead the overall process.
At this moment, what I can suggest is that the current big ofbiz might need
to be split into sub
hi all,
I try to build a new application using ofbiz. Basically, I want to use the
nice overall architect of ofbiz, theme mechanism and
Party/Permission/SecurityGroup. However, I found it is very difficult to
remove unnecessary components.
For example, entitymodel.xml from applications/party
Just found an article about the dependency:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+DependenciesFrom
the component relationship diagram, it seems I have to include all
components under
hmm...I compared the article and the latest code from trunk. I don't think
the diagram is consistent with codes.
For example, from the diagram party doesn't depend on marketing; however, as
I mentioned in previous email, party entity definition does use
ContactListParty from marketing.
--
This question feels like it should be a FAQ...
Michael Xu (xudong) wrote:
hi all,
I try to build a new application using ofbiz. Basically, I want to use the
nice overall architect of ofbiz, theme mechanism and
Party/Permission/SecurityGroup. However, I found it is very difficult to
remove
Hi Michael,
the framework isolation and a framework-only installation is
definitely something the community as talken about many times. You
will find several conversations searching the mailing list.
We will have it sooner or later and any help you could provide on this
topic will be much
36 matches
Mail list logo