). Side note— Camel was born out of the
ActiveMQ project to address these scenarios in a more manageable way vs having
server-side static configuration — like the JMS bridge feature.
-Matt
> On Apr 14, 2021, at 3:31 AM, Zampogna, Biagio
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> In my scenario
er
The broker's activemq.xml file comes already configured to support Camel; you
just need to customize the routing rules.
Can anyone share the activemq.xml that shows me how, in the activemq.xml?, I
shows how to implement the JMS - JMS Bridge?
Thanks in advance
kind regards
, and send it to the ACC env
> achivemq.
>
> Obviously the prod achivemq is sitting on a different cluster than the ACC
> activemq.
>
> I was looking at the
>
> https://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge
>
> But I don't fully understand how to adapt it for my scen
was looking at the
https://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge
But I don't fully understand how to adapt it for my scenario.
I mean if I look at this example
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/trunk/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/resources/org/apache/activemq/network/jms/queue-xbean.xml
I think the solution is simply to create an explicit ConnectionFactory and
set it as the localQueueConnectionFactory on the bridge:
...
...
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-tp4679181p4704983
I think the solution is simply to create an explicit ConnectionFactory and
set it as the localQueueConnectionFactory on the bridge:
...
...
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge
is your problem solved?
i have exact same problem as yours.
if you find the solution could you please share it with me?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-tp4679181p4703904.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
Hi everyone,
I'm using a JMS to JMS bridge consuming from queueA and dispatching the
messages to queue B (connection to WebLogic Service).
I was having problems to make the connection to the WebLogic, but there was
no output in the logs that it fails to connect. Only when I changed the logs
their connectors.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-bridge-reconnection-dispatching-not-working-in-simple-conditions-tp4684887p4685246.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-bridge-reconnection-dispatching-not-working-in-simple-conditions-tp4684887p4685180.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hmm, it looks like there are two reentrant locks.
Are there 2 brokers running in the same JVM connecting over a network
connector with the VM transport?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-bridge-reconnection-dispatching-not-working-in-simple
?
I can supply test cases for this, logs, heap dumps or thread dumps if it
helps getting this fixed.
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-bridge-reconnection-dispatching
that I would try is grabbing a stack trace.
Is you don't want to do that, no worries. Other than leading to the
annoyance of needing a kill -9, is there any other impact?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-bridge-reconnection-dispatching
? Is there a flag I missed in my configuration?
Is there a migration guide that I didn't see?
I can supply test cases for this, logs, heap dumps or thread dumps if it
helps getting this fixed.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-bridge-reconnection
issues at all.
I this a known issue? Do you guys see any obvious explanation in the
configuration of the producer/consumes or brokers (I certainly don't)?
Help would be greatly appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-bridge-reconnection
I noticed there is another Topic in the forums that sounds similar to our
issue.
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMq-consumer-intermittently-hanging-after-reconnect-td4684226.html
Could we be experiencing the same problem. The JMS Bridge basically creates
a Consumer and Producer
in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684280.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684283.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the outbound bridges are reset. So, we have to restart the app in order
for the bridge to be reset. Essentially, we get this EOFException and
ActiveMQ can not recover. A restart is mandatory.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge
receive the same messages again on every
reconnect and would stop at the same point.
One way to tell - try the same setup with a stand-alone broker using the
configs provided to see if it has the same problems.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS
not replicate the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684204.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
,
since we have seen windows of success; we are skeptical that this is the
fix.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684207.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We are running into an issue with ActiveMQ JMS to JMS Bridge.
On Server A we have a stand alone instance of ActiveMQ with 4 queues:
queue_1_inbound
queue_2_inbound
queue_3_inbound
queue_outbound
On Server B we have 3 embedded ActiveMQ instances, each in their own JVM.
JVM 1 will have
.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684130.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
What does the log of the other side of the connection report?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684131.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
disconnected.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684134.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
).
To clarify one consideration - the failover transport should be isolating
the JMS bridge from lost connections.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684135.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
around the same time.
Server A is managed by a different group, so I might be able to get them to
get us log files with information around the same time. But it may take a
bit to coordinate efforts.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge
messages and brief interruptions to flow the only real
concern? I'm trying to make sure I'm trying to solve the right problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684140.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
is not used as noted above.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684142.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684149.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
while messages are being transmitted?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684150.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
timeouts since the timeouts point to a tangible, likely external, issue, but
still valuable.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-Connection-tp4684129p4684151.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
we configured it.
*Broker A:*
*Broker B*
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-vs-Network-of-Brokers-tp4681063p4681120.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The JMS bridge is a good solution to use. I disagree with the statement in
the referenced discussion that the demand-forwarding bridge is always more
efficient and a better choice always for ActiveMQ-to-ActiveMQ.
Without getting into too much detail, the JMS bridge is a good choice when
I am just starting out learning ActiveMQ. We are running into issues with
JMS Queue Bridging. I looked at the JMS to JMS Bridge
http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge.html Article, and the
Network of Brokers http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Article. Both seem like
not call out specifically the correct
element other than the text JMS Bridge Queue Connector and JMS Bridge
Topic Connector.
activemq.xml
jmsBridgeConnectors
jmsQueueConnector
localUsername=username
localPassword=password
outboundQueueConnectionFactory=#remoteFactory
inboundQueueBridges
I have configure a JMS to JMS bridge with out issue. When turning on jaas
with in the broker:
plugins
jaasAuthenticationPlugin configuration=karaf /
/plugins
Which is the simple auth using the users.properties files.
And configuring my jmsQueueConnector with attributes
The JMS bridge connects into the broker like a client.
See the localUsername and localPassword settings.
http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge.html
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-tp4679181p4679182.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 05:35 -0700, d_van_rietschoten wrote:
Hello,
I have a JMS to JMS bridge. Although it functions well, the throughput is
low (roughly about 1 message a second).
I am not very familiar with ActiveMq, but have used Jboss messaging /
HornetQ. These products provide batch
/AMQ-2455 - is fixed in
5.4.0, try it out.
On 26 August 2010 21:32, TreyH th...@centraldesktop.com wrote:
About once a day my JMS-to-JMS bridge stops and requires a restart of
ActiveMQ to get it to resume. I don't get anything bridge related
showing
up in my data/activemq.log
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2455 - is fixed in
5.4.0, try it out.
On 26 August 2010 21:32, TreyH th...@centraldesktop.com wrote:
About once a day my JMS-to-JMS bridge stops and requires a restart of
ActiveMQ to get it to resume. I don't get anything bridge related showing
:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2455 - is fixed in
5.4.0, try it out.
On 26 August 2010 21:32, TreyH th...@centraldesktop.com wrote:
About once a day my JMS-to-JMS bridge stops and requires a restart of
ActiveMQ to get it to resume. I don't get anything bridge related
About once a day my JMS-to-JMS bridge stops and requires a restart of
ActiveMQ to get it to resume. I don't get anything bridge related showing
up in my data/activemq.log
This is a single queue ActiveMQ - OpenMQ bridge. The code for my
connection factory wrapper around OpenMQ and the general
Of course, missing the important info.
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.3.1, JDK 6, FreeBSD 8
TreyH wrote:
About once a day my JMS-to-JMS bridge stops and requires a restart of
ActiveMQ to get it to resume. I don't get anything bridge related showing
up in my data/activemq.log
This is a single
)
at
org.apache.activemq.network.jms.JmsQueueConnector.init(JmsQueueConnector.java:59)
at
org.apache.activemq.network.jms.JmsConnector.start(JmsConnector.java:116)
...
Thank you very much so far!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge---ActiveMQ-to-JBoss-Messaging-tp25417921p25417921
A Bridge to other JMS Queue providers --
bean id=jmsQueueConnector
class=org.apache.activemq.network.jms.JmsQueueConnector
property name=name value=jmsQueueBridge/
property name=jndiOutboundTemplate ref=remoteJndi/
property name=outboundQueueConnectionFactoryName
value
Thanks for the response. I will check out Camel to see if that makes sense
for my use case. (If that's the best practice, I think the JMS-to-JMS
Bridge page on the ActiveMQ site should be updated to recommend that.)
In the meantime, I've already invested a lot of time into the ActiveMQ
solution
://www.nabble.com/file/p11352956/Results.txt Results.txt
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JMS-2-JMS-bridge-%3A-Interoperable-Problem-with-Oracle-AQ-JMS--tf3997438s2354.html#a11352956
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
49 matches
Mail list logo
