Wir haben das Problem, dass durch die ShortCuts, praktisch Links entstehen mit
doppeltem Content.
Wie kann ich TYP03 beibringen dass bei ShortCut-Seiten, also wenn die URL auf
eine ShortCut Seite verweist, dieser Link nicht indiziert werden soll von
Google.
Beispiel:
www.meinedomain/autos
Hi, I am having a little problem here, I have a .htaccess that looks
thus:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteBase /INDEX
RewriteRule \.(log|sqlite)$ index.php [L]
RewriteRule \.(js|css|png|jpg|gif|xml)$ - [L]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?m=$1 [L,QSA]
When I type http://foo/INDEX/mp3; it goes [internally]
Dear All,
im a novice to apache
i have CentOS 5 server running Apache 2.2.3 .
i would like to know my apache is compiled with mod_perl. since
apache was installed when i installed Centos 5
and if apache not compiled with mod perl how could i have apache complied
with mod_perl
apprecite n
Hi,
I'm trying to compile Apache 1.3.37 with a series of modules, but I'm
getting a bunch of errors in make. I'm using CentOS 5.1
The errors are like this:
mod_include.c:2318: error: expected â)â before â*â token
mod_include.c:2325: error: expected â)â before â*â token
mod_include.c:2345:
Yes I did.
I discovered that I've the problem if I lisen and mp3 @ 192Kbps, but if I
listen and mp3 @ 128 Kbps I've no trouble...
Alberto
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: giovedì 12 giugno 2008 15.08
To:
Benedict simon wrote:
Dear All,
im a novice to apache
i have CentOS 5 server running Apache 2.2.3 .
i would like to know my apache is compiled with mod_perl. since
apache was installed when i installed Centos 5
and if apache not compiled with mod perl how could i have apache complied
with
Alberto Dondana pisze:
Yes I did.
I discovered that I've the problem if I lisen and mp3 @ 192Kbps, but if I
listen and mp3 @ 128 Kbps I've no trouble...
It's rather related to your bandwidth, not your webserver.
m.
-
The
Alberto Dondana wrote:
Yes I did.
I discovered that I've the problem if I lisen and mp3 @ 192Kbps, but if I
listen and mp3 @ 128 Kbps I've no trouble...
I am not really a specialist, but logically it seems that if you have to
feed 4 clients, each at 128 Kbit/s, then at some point your
Hi all,
I have Apache used as a load balancer in front of a couple of Mongrels
(ruby on rails application). Reading the documentation for Apache, I
was under the impression that the requests would not be forwarded to
my Mongrels, but would stop at Apache, at least until the Expires time.
It's been a few years since I've done any extensive work with Apache
and could use some help with a server that I've inherited.
The Apache server is configured with a VirtualHost that is used to
support a single, web-based collaboration tool. The URL used to
access the collaboration tool
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the Apache access log, it's clear that Apache is processing a lot
of requests from systems probing for vulnerabilities. Rather than have
Apache process the request, I would like to immediately
I need to set up a test environment where I am running Apache locally
with a number of xml data files as objects to serve.
I am doing this to simulate a live server tha I don't want to disturb
for my testing. The live server responds to requests for file URL:s
like: http://server/dir/file.xml.gz
Bo Berglund wrote:
[...]
It seems like there is a setting in the Apache server to change so
that the server along with the actual file data also sends something
that triggers the expansion. What this could be I don't know, and
therefore I am asking here.
If I understand correctly, the files
André Warnier wrote:
Bo Berglund wrote:
[...]
It seems like there is a setting in the Apache server to change so
that the server along with the actual file data also sends something
that triggers the expansion. What this could be I don't know, and
therefore I am asking here.
If I understand
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:45:04 -0700, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perhaps the AddEncoding directive would help? I
don't really know as I have not tried it, but it is worth a try.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_mime.html#addencoding
Combined with the AddType directive to tell the
Hi all,
i have a Apache224 working like load balancer betwin two tomcats.
If i go direct to one of those tomcats, i see all correct, if i call
the apache doenst work.
in the error log i got this:
[Fri Jun 13 14:42:19 2008] [error] (104)Connection reset by peer:
ajp_ilink_receive() can't receive
Hi again.
To find out exactly what happens on one server (where it does it right)
and the other (where it doesn't), you should have a look at the HTTP
headers sent in the server response, in one case and the other.
I'll give you what I would use, because I am a perl user, and there is a
Hi,
Apache 2.2.9 has been officially released however it doesn't appear to be on
any mirror, not even the source code. Has something gone wrong?
Cheers
Graeme
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Graeme Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Apache 2.2.9 has been officially released however it doesn't appear to be on
any mirror, not even the source code. Has something gone wrong?
Have a little patience. Mirrors take up to 24 hours to sync. That is
why no
On 13 Jun 2008, at 09:47:43, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the Apache access log, it's clear that Apache is
processing a lot
of requests from systems probing for vulnerabilities. Rather than
have
Apache
Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
On 13 Jun 2008, at 09:47:43, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I may add my grain of salt : often the issue is that such error
messages end up cluttering the logfile, consuming
It's not announced yet and so the official release is really
when it is announced, to give mirrors time to sync up.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 08:25:12PM +0100, Graeme Walker wrote:
Hi,
Apache 2.2.9 has been officially released however it doesn't appear to be
on any mirror, not even
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, I'm tired of the bullshit. I don't want to spend my life filling
out forms explaining to those that haven't a clue that their vulnerability
is a false positive. I want to configure Apache to reject
Right. I guess the real question is how you determined it's released?
Since the official release announcement goes out either late tonight or
sometime tomorrow, you have to give our mirrors 12 to 24 hours.
But really - how did you determine that? Yes - 2.2.9 will ship and be
an official
Its on the download page, with the changelog, so you naturally assume its
available for download, particularly since all the links are pointing to
2.2.9.
Graeme
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:12 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Right. I guess the real question is how you
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:42:46 +0200, André Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To find out exactly what happens on one server (where it does it right)
and the other (where it doesn't), you should have a look at the HTTP
headers sent in the server response, in one case and the other.
I'll give you
Greetings, everyone.
In February 2005 Nick Kew pointed out a problem with mod_proxy's
ProxyPassReverse directive: though contained inside a Location section,
ProxyPassReverse would still be applied at the server level. Here's a link to
an archive of that discussion:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of the web servers I manage. It runs FreeBSD
6.2, Apache 2.2.8 and PHP 5.2.1. It runs a high-ish number of pre-fork
processes (usually around 240).
What basically happens is that during our peak hours in the evening
the site becomes very slow as does
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:42:46 +0200, André Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To find out exactly what happens on one server (where it does it right)
and the other (where it doesn't), you should have a look at the HTTP
headers sent in the server response, in one case and the
Stut wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of the web servers I manage. It runs FreeBSD
6.2, Apache 2.2.8 and PHP 5.2.1. It runs a high-ish number of pre-fork
processes (usually around 240).
What basically happens is that during our peak hours in the evening
the site becomes very slow as does
On 13 Jun 2008, at 22:37, Dragon wrote:
Stut wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of the web servers I manage. It runs
FreeBSD
6.2, Apache 2.2.8 and PHP 5.2.1. It runs a high-ish number of pre-
fork
processes (usually around 240).
What basically happens is that during our peak hours in
Stut wrote:
On 13 Jun 2008, at 22:37, Dragon wrote:
Stut wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of the web servers I manage. It runs
FreeBSD
6.2, Apache 2.2.8 and PHP 5.2.1. It runs a high-ish number of pre- fork
processes (usually around 240).
What basically happens is that during our peak
On 13 Jun 2008, at 22:56, Dragon wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 13 Jun 2008, at 22:37, Dragon wrote:
Stut wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of the web servers I manage. It runs
FreeBSD
6.2, Apache 2.2.8 and PHP 5.2.1. It runs a high-ish number of
pre- fork
processes (usually around 240).
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:42:46 +0200, André Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To find out exactly what happens on one server (where it does it right)
and the other (where it doesn't), you should have a look at the HTTP
headers sent in the server response, in one case and the
look at sar output and see the wait times on the disk is more than the
service time.
On 6/13/08, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Jun 2008, at 22:56, Dragon wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 13 Jun 2008, at 22:37, Dragon wrote:
Stut wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with one of the web servers I
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:29:16 -0700, Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There should be a difference in the HTTP headers.
The difference will tell you (or us) where to start looking.
You are using Firefox, yes? (I seem to recall that...)
If so, go get the LiveHeaders
On 13 Jun 2008, at 23:38, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
look at sar output and see the wait times on the disk is more than
the service time.
That command doesn't seem to exist on FreeBSD. Do you know if there's
an equivalent command?
-Stut
On 6/13/08, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Jun
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
Scott Jorgenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings, everyone.
In February 2005 Nick Kew pointed out a problem with mod_proxy's
ProxyPassReverse directive: though contained inside a Location
section, ProxyPassReverse would still be applied at the
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:06:45 -0400
Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise, mod_rewrite could certainly be used. If you want the
uber-powerful approach, mod_security can also do stuff like this.
Indeed, normal Allow/Deny is the correct and best way to do this.
mod_security is an
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:17:32 +0200
Bo Berglund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to set up a test environment where I am running Apache locally
with a number of xml data files as objects to serve.
I am doing this to simulate a live server tha I don't want to disturb
for my testing. The live
try sa
On 6/13/08, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Jun 2008, at 23:38, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
look at sar output and see the wait times on the disk is more than the
service time.
That command doesn't seem to exist on FreeBSD. Do you know if there's an
equivalent command?
-Stut
On
Thanks for the info, Nick.
Strangely, I'm using 2.0.59 and am quite sure I'm encountering exactly that old
problem. My configuration is like this:
Location /abc
ProxyPass http://my-server.example.com/some-path
ProxyPassReverse http://my-server.example.com/some-path
/Location
Location
Res wrote:
Folks,
When we sorted out the licence issues with mysql inclusion in 2.2.8 a
very simple configure of adding --with-mysql became a dream, now this
and an important option for this system, the --with-devrandom option,
have both dissapeared and configure puts up warnings all over
43 matches
Mail list logo
