If you have that many look at RewriteMap
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/rewrite/rewritemap.html
From: Frank Gingras
Sent: 26 October 2022 02:42
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] specification of .htaccess [EXT]
This is an extremely bad idea. Do you have access to your
Never had these issues at all if you set up vhosts correctly.
But agree we tend to have 2 vhosts for the domain
* vhost 1 is the real vhost and handle requests
* vhost 2 contains all the redirects from other domain names to the canonical
one
The only ServerAlias lines in vhost 1 are for
Lets encrypt is reliable from our point of view - never had an issue with it -
we occasionally have issues when renewing certs - we have about 90 of them -
but that is mainly with the "fake-manual" process of updating DNS which is not
100% reliable with the changes we make.
In use speed should
9:
> caught SIGTERM, shutting down
> On Jan 4, 2022, at 5:51 PM, Jim Albert wrote:
>
> On 1/4/2022 8:37 PM, James Coyle wrote:
>> I have checked both, but have made no changes to the locations of either the
>> access log nor the error log:
>>
>> CustomLog &q
1/4/2022 8:11 PM, James Coyle wrote:
>> I recently added PHP and MySql to my Apache setup, and now notice that the
>> access and error logs are not working. (The site IS working)
>>
>> They both stopped working on the 31st - I don’t know if that is relevant or
>> not.
I recently added PHP and MySql to my Apache setup, and now notice that the
access and error logs are not working. (The site IS working)
They both stopped working on the 31st - I don’t know if that is relevant or
not. I have not changed the location of the logs and I have not added a Virtual
Pursuant to my previous post, I’m now running into this error:
Wed Dec 29 17:26:38.548023 2021] [so:notice] [pid 10505] AH06662: Allowing
module loading process to continue for module at
/usr/local/opt/php/lib/httpd/modules/libphp.so because module signature matches
authority "James
Thanks - that did help. Now if I can fix the other problem listed in my other
email, I should be good to go.
> On Dec 29, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 7:14 PM James Coyle
> wrote:
>>
>> A short while ago, I loaded PHP to m
] [so:notice] [pid 4404] AH06662: Allowing
module loading process to continue for module at
/usr/local/opt/php/lib/httpd/modules/libphp.so because module signature matches
authority "James Coyle" specified in LoadModule directive
httpd: Syntax error on line 191 of /private/etc/apache2/
If touching the configuration of the system is proving difficult – there is
always an option to run a further apache on another machine which handles the
SSL, and passes the requests back of plain HTTP, in fact this is the way most
of the Apache servers we have are set up – it may be Apache,
to send HTTP requests - and
instead send HTTPS requests. This works better than the redirect as with the
redirect the payload has already been sent un encrypted before being resent,
and also POST data is in the redirect.
James
--
The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Resear
ard "user" (or "residential"), they may not
allow incoming server connections. You would need to change your service type to
"business."
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
You can add:
Header always set X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block"
which will help – but the rest you need to look at the way you code your pages.
Then you can look at
(1) defensive code
(2) Content-Security-Policy header
(3) Specific rules in Apache to mitigate attacks
Remembering that XSS is
Yes the answer is almost certainly to do with the number of domains/size of
code – even if all the sites are running the same code – they are likely to
have different copies of it (unless they are all running the exact same copy of
the code – and using a name based switch somewhere in it) There
This is what we saw as well - simple things like disabling .htaccess files can
make a huge difference in performance (I haven't set up a server with .htaccess
files enabled for the best part of 20 years now because of the performance hit)
From: Rose, John B
Sent: 11 March 2021 21:02
To:
.
How about questions number 2 and 3?
On Thursday, March 11, 2021, 09:46:03 PM GMT+3:30, James Smith
wrote:
A forward proxy is what you put between your web browser and the internet
(often called a proxy by browsers) often this happens on corporate networks) -
the reverse proxy
mod_event is comparable to NGINX I believe speed wise - but from experience
Apache is more stable!
-Original Message-
From: Jason Long
Sent: 11 March 2021 17:34
To: Users Maillingsliste Apache
Subject: [users@httpd] Is NGINX faster than Apache? [EXT]
Hello,
Is it true that NGINX is
A forward proxy is what you put between your web browser and the internet
(often called a proxy by browsers) often this happens on corporate networks) -
the reverse proxy is between the internet and the webserver
There are some issues with mod_security and e.g. wordpress sites - so you have
to
forward the
requests?
On Wednesday, March 10, 2021, 09:47:03 AM GMT+3:30, Jason Long
wrote:
Thank you so much.
Thus, The Front end and Back end servers are same about the security.
What does "handle backend server down" mean?
On Tuesday, March 9, 2021, 04:30:01 PM GMT+3:30, Jame
Yes - you should harden the front-end as this is what is likely to be
compromised by general attacking.
Run SSL, run a static server & proxy server, set security headers, handle
backend server down, handle http -> https redirects, handle basic auth (you can
have a general rule for wordpress
Without knowing what your website is we can’t really see what is wrong. Have
you used chrome (or whatever browser you are using) developer’s tools to see
what is blocked by your content security policy (CSP)
From: Nick Folino
Sent: 08 February 2021 17:30
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener
Sent: 08 February 2021 13:13
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Which parameters must be set to solve these
Vulnerabilities? [EXT]
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:24 AM Jason Long wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I scanned my Apache web server and
is better to be something like a UUID or similar.
Second time payment is attempted on cart with given UUID the attempt is
rejected.
James
-Original Message-
From: John
Sent: 19 January 2021 16:56
To: Apache
Subject: [users@httpd] Replays from Internet [EXT]
Since the beginning
The first place to look in this case is the size of the apache processes. Once
the OP has got on top of this - then other issues can be investigated.
So process would be:
1) Reduce number of modules in Apache (>100 at the moment) should be
around 15-25 region;
2) Look at memory
der attack. [EXT]
Hi James,
what was the command you used to see that apache uses ~1GB of memory? I deleted
the mail and that was a bad idea: there were some very useful commands you were
giving us here.
On 12.01.21 12:17, James Smith wrote:
> That shows you only have 2 incoming requests. Ho
Htcacheclean is I think only a disk based cache cleaner (something you
shouldn't really be using anyway!)
The only way to clean up apache memory is a either to kill your child processes
or restart apache itself.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Long
Sent: 12 January 2021 23:26
To:
Tuesday, January 12, 2021, 02:55:14 PM GMT+3:30, James Smith
wrote:
That shows you only have 2 incoming requests. How many lines if you remove the
TIME_WAIT
Try: netstat -n | grep ':80 ' | wc
This may show lots of short requests happening over time
But to be honest the host important thing y
:16126 FIN_WAIT2
tcp6 0 0 X.X.X.X:80 X.X.X.X:64595 FIN_WAIT2
On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, 02:20:00 PM GMT+3:30, James Smith
wrote:
If you want incoming traffic you can do:
netstat -n | grep ':443 ' | grep -v TIME_WAIT
The incoming IP should be the 2nd
-DFOREGROUND
1250040 3912624 978156 64 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND
1299300 3986396 996599 84 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND
1367304 4012976 1003244 74 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND
How can I see the IP addresses and their incoming traffic?
On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, 01:49:21 PM GMT+3:30, James Smith
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache in under attack. [EXT]
System administrators doing it manually???
On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, 01:28:50 PM GMT+3:30, James Smith
wrote:
Rate limiting may work - but the rate may be just slightly to slow for your
setting - manually doing it is a good
Sometimes we are attacked from a farm of machines so it may have to be an ip
range that is the issue
-Original Message-
From: James Smith
Sent: 12 January 2021 10:19
To: 'users@httpd.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache in under attack. [EXT]
Yes - it is something we need
n it automatically blocked.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, 12:49:50 PM GMT+3:30, James Smith
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Jason,
>
> I would also query why your process are ~ 1G resident that seems quite large
> for apache.
GMT+3:30, James Smith
wrote:
Can't see anything that should blow up like that to be honest - I usually use
ubuntu - which configures apache in a much, much nicer way {generally for web
development stuff it is a better flavour of linux}
What is the output of:
apache2 -t -D DUMP_MODULES
, but "Firewalld" or "iptables" can't do it automatically? When an IP
sending many request then it automatically blocked.
On Tuesday, January 12, 2021, 12:49:50 PM GMT+3:30, James Smith
wrote:
Jason,
I would also query why your process are ~ 1G resident that seems qui
Can't see anything that should blow up like that to be honest - I usually use
ubuntu - which configures apache in a much, much nicer way {generally for web
development stuff it is a better flavour of linux}
What is the output of:
apache2 -t -D DUMP_MODULES
to see what modules you have
of small static request (images/css/js) where you run two
web servers - one serving static content and proxying back to dynamic content.
James
-Original Message-
From: James Smith
Sent: 12 January 2021 09:09
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache in under attack. [EXT
Put a firewall rule into block whatever that first IP address is then.
Something like:
firewall-cmd --permanent --add-rich-rule="rule family='ipv4' source
address='X.X.X.X' reject"
If you are seeing a current attack then you can tweak Charles' command line to:
tail -1 access.log | awk
Why do you want to rate limit the upload speed to your server - slow upload
speeds tend to be the thing that causes Apache issues rather than the other way
round.
If it is because your server is on a narrow pipe and you are worried about
being swamped by one connection - then rate limiting
To be honest from a security point of view - you shouldn't be doing this if
the client can't talk to your server you need to look for a new client?
Assuming from what you say this is just a monitoring tool.
We have switched off TLS v1.0 and v1.1 as all the browsers which we consider
secure
rent connections can it handle?
James
-Original Message-
From: Massimo Iovino
Sent: 14 November 2020 09:35
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [users@httpd] apache tuning for 1500/2000 concurrent connections [EXT]
Hello everyone. I need to configure Apache 2.4 mpm-prefork (or I don't
to get to you. We have noticed quite large differences with users going through
VPNs having major issues. And remember that remotely many users will be using
asymmetric connections – download is fast, upload is usually throttled to
between 10 and 25% of the download speed.
James
From: eric tse
better ways of transferring large files in web-browsers nowadays
using clever JavaScript which slices the file and a script which stitches the
parts back together at your end – transfers are smaller and avoids time outs.
Can also parallelize them if required.
James
From: eric tse
Sent: 29
@httpd] Forwarding IP to HTTPS. [EXT]
James,
Unless the user has many hosts, I would recommend against using mod_rewrite
here. It isn't needed. And your vhost should include an explicity ServerName
directive.
On 12/10/20 11:56 AM, James Smith wrote:
> So I would do this for the virtual h
ubject: Re: [users@httpd] Forwarding IP to HTTPS. [EXT]
Excuse me,
Can you clean my configuration?
On Monday, October 12, 2020, 07:06:17 PM GMT+3:30, Frank
mailto:thu...@apache.org>> wrote:
James,
Omitting an explicit ServerName in name-based vhosts is a bad idea as
well. You can
the floor
-Original Message-
From: Frank
Sent: 12 October 2020 16:36
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Forwarding IP to HTTPS. [EXT]
James,
Omitting an explicit ServerName in name-based vhosts is a bad idea as well. You
can create conflicts or ambiguities.
O
This would be my set-up in your case - note as someone said it was too complex
I've removed the extra security bits I'd left in by accident...
## Port 80 && 443 default configs...
RequestHeader unset X-is-ssl
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^(.*)$
Yes - with Apache you put a default virtual host which redirects all traffic to
your https server
RequestHeader unset X-is-ssl
Require all denied
Require all granted
ProxyPreserveHost on
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^(.*)$
There are two sorts of compression - TLS and HTTP.
It is recommended not to compress the TLS traffic (as CRIME can then be used to
guess cookies etc) - compresses the whole response.
But compressing HTTP traffic is OK - unless there is some secret stored in the
body of the HTML page {it only
This has nothing to do with keepalivetimeout – that is to do with keeping a
connection open to send subsequent requests without re-negotiating the
connection.
It is TimeOut which is the gap between sending packets of the response.
If your response is taking more than 1 minute to generate then
play anything.
Another way of solving some of these issues is to use tell-tales – small images
{blank gif/png} that are embedded into the HTML that are generated dynamically
– this is the way google analytics/matamo etc do this sort of logging. Or just
use AJAX.
James
From: Tom Browder
Sent
n't
> looked into actual debugging yet.
>
Aren't cookies good for this type of tracking?
Your description of the backend processing does not seem to preclude their
use.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Definitely SQLite will be a bottle neck in this system – not great for writing
to – both Pg or MySQL would be an almost certainly better solution for repeated
writing to.
You could get some simple gains by splitting the database up so that there is a
database per site rather than a database
I frames have their use – but usually to include content from another site
(e.g. google maps, you tube etc) – or to embed dynamic content that either
needs to be dynamically updated and can’t do this with AJAX or you are
struggling with CSS clashes as the iframe is a different document. Not
what you are doing - perhaps an
example URL or two would be useful for us to offer some support...
James
-Original Message-
From: Tom Browder
Sent: 03 October 2020 19:08
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [users@httpd] Re: Alternatives to SSI (server side includes)? [EXT]
On Sat
ason Long
Sent: 06 September 2020 12:22
To: users@httpd.apache.org; James Smith
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Some questions about configuration Apache from a
beginer. [EXT]
Thank you for your help.
Is the content of "/etc/hosts" and "/etc/hostname" files important for get
HTTPS ce
The first one doesn’t matter – but to be honest you shouldn’t do it – you
should create two configurations – one for the www.domain and one for domain.
Choose one as canonical (the one you really want users to see) and put the real
configuration here.
Under the other domain – you include a
Not sure what Nextcloud is - but this is often common amongst "black-box" web
apps that bootstrap themselves, and handle upgrades from the UI interface.
The webserver has to be able to re-write it's own files for the upgrades.
Scary and against all "normal" secure procedures if you manage
You will need to read up the difference between the 2.2 and 2.4 apache
documents [there are some ugrade docs] - just copying the configuration over
will not work...
e.g. LockFile -> Mutex;
Order allow,deny / Deny from all -> Require all denied
Order allow,deny / Allow from all -> Require all
Add also remember to add the HSTS headers
Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=63072000;
includeSubDomains; preload"
{only put includeSubDomains & preload if you can} this stops the client sending
further HTTP requests but only HTTPS {most web servers}
This can stop the plain
Do you see anything different between the users that work and the users
that don't.. Do they use a different browser (useragent) or HTTP protocol?
On 18/03/2020 12:40, "Jürgen Göres" wrote:
Hi all,
we are currently observing a really bizarre problem on a customer system.
Our software runs a
Do you embed external resources (like fonts in) these don't tend to have
the same headers set... I get this with one of my static sites - I have
13 requests and three are for google fonts (nunito-sans) and these don't
have decent headers set!
On 18/02/2020 19:00, edflecko . wrote:
I mention
others have noted, access to your site is blocked either by your ISP, by
your firewall or router, or both.
Many ISPs have two general services: residential and business. Often the
residential service does not allow incoming/public service access to a host,
like HTTP or email.
--
James Moe
moe d
for the information and I apologize for needlessly engaging the mail
list.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Christophe JAILLET
Subject: Re: Apache/2.4.26 (Unix) undocumented error AH02651
Le 21/08/2019 à 17:58, HISEY, JAMES a écrit :
> Running Apache 2.4.26 on RHEL7, I'm receiving an error in my apache er
Running Apache 2.4.26 on RHEL7, I'm receiving an error in my apache error log
of AH02651: Error writing request body to script I am
unable to locate a meaningful description of AH02651 anywhere as all error
lists I can find stop in the lower 2000's. It appears to happen when the
POSTDATA
gt;
Many ISPs have restrictions on servers. Often a "residential" Internet
service does not allow website or email servers. That is, connections
initiated from outside your network are blocked.
Check with your ISP about serving websites.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe d
deny from 40.77.167.0/24
deny from 207.46.13.0/24
Is there a way to write a filter that blocks the above URL patterns
without generating a 404 response?
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04/02/2019 6.18 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> My question is: Does the certificate validation occur before or after
>> processing <.htaccess>?
>
> Long before, the handshake is complete before any HTTP request.
>
Ah, quite.
Thanks.
--
James Moe
moe dot
"https://sohnen-moe.com/products/books/#product-business-mastery;
#
#
# 20180315 jmm: Always use a secure connection
#
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R]
[ end ]
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743
field which doesn't
typically require it.
thanks again for the advice; it's greatly appreciated.
James
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:49 PM David Spector <
david...@springtimesoftware.com> wrote:
> James Kerwin,
>
> When strange characters cause HTTP error 500, this is usually caused
would be helpful as I'm not getting
far with it at the moment.
Thanks,
James
for real?
2018-08-13_01:52:12 50332-03786 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [TLS-out]
23.83.215.32
to: ji...@sohnen-moe.com disconnected: session:7F62FA585BC0 23.83.215.32
- processing time 1 seconds
2018-08-13_01:52:12 [Worker_1] Worker_1 will sleep now
[ end ]----
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-mo
On 07/16/2018 02:53 PM, James Moe wrote:
> After the upgrade from v2.4.23 to v2.4.33, https requests yield error
> 403:
> Access forbidden!
> You don't have permission to access the requested directory. There is
> either no index document or the directory is read-protected.
>
On 07/16/2018 02:53 PM, James Moe wrote:
> After the upgrade from v2.4.23 to v2.4.33, https requests yield error
> 403: Access forbidden!
> http requests return: error 400 Bad request!
>
I have read the docs. I have added what seemed like the correct
directive for allowing a
On 07/16/2018 02:53 PM, James Moe wrote:
> So, the "permissions" are an apache thing, not OS?
>
These are the OS directory permissions to the Doc Root
/data01/t-drv/websites/sma-v3/:
drwxrwxr-x 1 root users 104 Feb 25 16:14 data01/
drwxrwxr-x 1 sma-user3x users 140 Ju
l/www.sma.com.cert-01.pem"
SSLCertificateKeyFile
"/data01/srv/vhosts.sma/ssl/www.sma.com.insecure-01.key"
# SSLCipherSuite HIGH:!SSLv2:!ADH:!aNULL:!eNULL:!NULL
SSLProtocol ALL -SSLv2
[ end ]
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/16/2018 11:59 AM, James Moe wrote:
> On opensuse v42.3 apache2 v2.4.23 worked fine. On opensuse 15.0 apache2
> v2.4.33 refuses to start.
>
After re-installing the package, an additional error was showm
regarding a missing SSL certificate listed in
. Fixing that allowed apache
3 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit
entered failed state.
2018-07-16T10:14:23-0700 sma-server3 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Failed
with result 'protocol'.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
#comment1190872_919581
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:07 AM James Montalvo
wrote:
> `sudo apachectl restart` failure with SQLSRV enabled, success with it
> disabled. journalctl output below:
>
> Jul 05 10:38:03 someserver sudo[17255]: someuser : TTY=pts/0 ;
> PWD=/etc/rc.d/init.d ; USER
/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale C) (disconnected
from bus)
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:30 PM Frank Gingras wrote:
> Next step would be to see if using `apachectl restart` works instead of
> relying on your distro's init scripts / systemd.
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:45 AM Ja
FYI, I posted this question on Server Fault:
https://serverfault.com/questions/919326/apache-wont-start-with-systemd
I included in that question the stack traces mentioned in my previous email.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:02 PM James Montalvo
wrote:
> You're right, running `httpd -X` is not dy
capture a test case where:
>
> 1) That php extension is loaded
> 2) httpd stops with httpd -X
>
> If httpd keeps running with -X while that extension is loaded, then there
> is no issue, and httpd is working fine.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:28 PM James Montalv
c33efd5f0, SOCK_CLOEXEC) = ? ERESTARTSYS
(To be restarted if SA_RESTART is set)
--- SIGINT {si_signo=SIGINT, si_code=SI_KERNEL} ---
rt_sigreturn({mask=[]}) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call)
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:37 PM Frank Gingras wrote:
> I'm going to venture that yo
mod_proxy is the standard approach here..
Set up a second vhost on 192.168.0.1 and get that to proxy back to
192.168.0.2
You will need to specify a small folder as doc root - basically to serve
error pages! - our error directory has static pages for each error
message we wont to handle +
quot;, and
"/var/log/httpd/error_log" for relevant log output. Can anyone help me
troubleshoot this? Also, this setup works fine on other servers, and I
can't think how this one is different.
[1] https://github.com/Microsoft/msphpsql
[2] https://github.com/Microsoft/msphpsql/issues/805
Thanks in advance,
James
didn’t think you could have two virtualhost entries with the same
IP/port. I would probably do this within with a single VirtualHost,
myself. Something like this combined with the RewriteRule:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^THE.CORRECT.HOSTNAME$
Rick Houser
Web Engineer
*From:*Dr James A Smith
The easiest way to do this is to make sure you have the correct hostname
in the virtual host - the one that matches your certificate and another
virtual host which has no hostname in it to catch all the other requests.
return a forbidden response for all requests!
RewriteEngine On
.)
Does zypper spawn a non-root process to run a2enmod? If so, what changes
are needed so it can run a2enmod?
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Looks like you are using php5_module with a PHP7 so file - you should be
using:
LoadModule php7_module /libphp7.0.so
On 01/06/2017 20:26, Roparzh Hemon wrote:
I am not on Apple here, and you don't say whether you are using php-fpm or
not, but assuming that you are, check the start up
sting help...
Thanks,
James
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:53 PM, James Kerwin <jkerwin2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Firstly, I'm a bit of a beginner so please be as patient as you can.
>
> I set up a practice website that sent data collected from a form to a
> dat
can't provide a secure connection" and "ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR".
Would somebody be willing to help?
So far I have this from openssl (sorry if it formats terribly, like I said;
beginner):
james@localhost:~$ openssl s_client -connect www.mydomain.com:443
CONNECTED(0003)
1401982735
You really only have one option at the moment and that is to pay for a
wild card certificate which will do this {lets encrypt doesn't allow you
yet}
It will probably set you back something like 100$ a year
o/w you will need to set your redirects up from xxx. to https://
individually
Is there an error.log in the same directory? This is usually in the same
directory this should contain some information about why the system failed.
On 03/05/2017 07:41, John Covici wrote:
Hi. I am having major problems figuring out a 500 response code I am
getting on my hserver.
I am
T+01:00 Richard <lists-apa...@listmail.innovate.net
<mailto:lists-apa...@listmail.innovate.net>>:
> Date: Saturday, February 18, 2017 11:04:34 -0700
> From: James Moe <ji...@sohnen-moe.com <mailto:ji...@sohnen-moe.com>>
>
> On 02/18/2017 05:08 AM, R
le.com/$1 [R]
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Debian 8 (Jessie?) Apache version is 2.4.10 which would suggest your
error is in the Order Allow, Deny area..
Should just be:
Requireall granted
see:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html
On 2017-01-19 04:34 PM, David Miranda Aragón wrote:
Good morning.
I am looking for help on
At work all out software is open source - but we have to include a
copyright notice in all source files where possible - as we then
distribute the content under LGPL. The logic is that if we didn't claim
copyright on the contents of the source - someone else might claim it
and make it closed
Before you get into trying to resolve issues with load there are a few
things to consider:
Your "model" of traffic is probably wrong...
* Have you seen this traffic shape.. if a user requests a page - it
will probably be a few milliseconds before the browser requests the
first static
Why are you attaching after the last meta tag - wouldn't it be easier
just before the tag or just after the tag - you should
have no other js in the header - except possibly an HTML 5 shim...
On 23/11/2016 08:08, Mayuresh wrote:
Any suggestions?
On Nov 22, 2016 11:32 AM, "Mayuresh"
Never used mod_substitute - but the standard PCRE way is s/(.*)>/$1/mxs - the .* will capture greedily - so captures all but last
meta...
On 22/11/2016 16:50, Mayuresh wrote:
Hi,
How can I check for the last occurrence of a string in the response
html and only replace the last
On 11/13/2016 02:14 AM, Jayaram Ponnusamy wrote:
>
> [For] Some reason our sites are extreme slow, ...
>
You should discover the reason why the sites are so slow.
--
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 533 matches
Mail list logo
