On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:01:37PM -0400, Yu, Ming wrote:
Is the patch available for download?
Plz, see the first link in:
-Original Message-
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36563
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-users/200509.mbox/%3c2005
[EMAIL
Hi!
I'm trying to allow access to one particular directory on my server. The
entier server is restricted by Basic auth but have AllowOverride
AuthConf so I think it's possible. But how?
Anyone knows?
Thanks.
--
Andreas Andersson
IT Dept.
Travelstart Nordic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a very unusual problem running httpd 1.3.27 on Solaris 2.8. The
daemon is forking and consuming 80-95% of the CPU and meanwhile requests
are just hanging. Nothing seems to be making it into the logs. We're
totally perplexed about this one. Unfortunately these production
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hello,
I have a very unusual problem running httpd 1.3.27 on Solaris 2.8.
The daemon is forking and consuming 80-95% of the CPU and meanwhile
requests are just hanging. Nothing seems to be making it into the
logs. We're totally perplexed
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 27. September 2005 13:04
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] allow access to one particular directory
Hi!
I'm trying to allow access to one particular directory on my
I managed the Apache up and running in no time thanks to help from
users here and excellent documentation.
There are a couple of things I could not completly figure out, if
somebody has time to answer.
what is @exp_errordir@ that appears in conf file?
are symlinks relevant in Windows env?
thanks
Thanks. I modified the files and then ran configure with ldap at
/usr/local/lib. But I got an error message:
configure: line 5912: unset: `ac_cv_lib_/usr/local/lib_ldap_init':
not a valid identifier.
- Ming
-Original Message-
From: Dmitriy Kirhlarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Yu, Ming wrote:
Thanks. I modified the files and then ran configure with ldap at
/usr/local/lib. But I got an error message:
configure: line 5912: unset: `ac_cv_lib_/usr/local/lib_ldap_init':
not a valid identifier.
What OS you are use?
look
I compiled this one on a Sun Solaris 10 system.
-Original Message-
From: Dmitriy Kirhlarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:19 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_ldap
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Yu, Ming wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:25:17PM +0200, Klaus Ebbe Grue wrote:
Hi,
Can you help with a hint for this scenario:
* If Apache is used as an http reverse proxy,
* if it relays a response from a backend server to a client,
* if the response is in HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding,
* and if
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:36:34PM -0700, Jignesh Badani wrote:
...
[Mon Sep 26 18:25:45 2005] [notice] child pid 326 exit signal Illegal
instruction (4)
The management is wanting to know the cause and so do I. What is the best
way to debug this ? I know we could upgrade to the latest
Kind of an odd problem
but I'm moving my stuff to a new server and for some reason Apache
(2.0.54) is
using a lot more memory on the new server than on the old server.
I'm hosting the same web sites and (I think) I have all the same
software installed. Both running Fedora Core 4. The new
Title: Loading of Siteminder module at apache start
Hi,
We are using apache version 1.3.33 web server with Siteminder version 5QMR7 for hosting our webpages. We have a slight performance issue with apache startup with this setup. It takes close to 5-7 minutes to start the apache web server
On Monday 26 September 2005 20:15, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 9/26/05, Normand Mongeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
this is my first posting here, so please bear with me if I'm at the
wrong
place.
I'm looking at Apache to be used as an HTTP server, to access a
GemStone
database
Because of many recent attacks on my machines in the last few months,
I built a new machine using a processor with a No-Execute bit. I put
all my sites on there with Apache 2.0.54 and patched everything to
date. I only allow port 80, 443, ftp and ssh to reach the machine.
There is only one user
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:37:16AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Kind of an odd problem but I'm moving my stuff to a new server and for
some reason Apache (2.0.54) is using a lot more memory on the new server
than on the old server.
I'm hosting the same web sites and (I think) I have all the
I'm thinking of setting up Apache to communicate with my back-end (a
GemStone database) through a single process thread running alongside Apache.
That thread would marshall requests through a TCP/IP pipe.
Two questions:
1 - This appears to be a potential bottleneck. If so, I suppose I can
The fact you got hacked means that whatever happened before is still
hapenning. That is, are you sure you don't have any odd cgi scripts
running that could be easily compromised ?
Yes, there are zero day exploits, but make sure all your other related
apps. are up to date. Ie, you could have
Clearly a developer question, but I'll ask here first since I'm not
subscribed elsewhere.
We are building a custom module to handle authentication for Apache and
need to configure some parameters for run time. Apache doesn't seem to
care for things it doesn't understand in httpd.conf upon
On 9/27/05, Ricardo Stella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fact you got hacked means that whatever happened before is still
hapenning. That is, are you sure you don't have any odd cgi scripts
running that could be easily compromised ?
Yes, there are zero day exploits, but make sure all your
Hello,
We discovered this problem on our own server quite some time ago. It was
linked to a problem with the forum software, phpBB. If you or anyone on the
server (customers etc) are running it, they should be advised to upgrade to
the latest versions. This also goes for any *Nuke software such
We don't run PHP on this machine. There must be a way at the Web
server level to prohibit it from writing scripts to the filesystem and
then executing them. Right??
On 9/27/05, Station51 Donations [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We discovered this problem on our own server quite some time
How would I purge my system...of apache, clean it up..and then reinstall so
that apache would run? Right now, I show that apache, apache2 and apache-ssl
are all installed, via apt-get and all are the newest versions. Yet, I can't
load localhost, or fyrenice.com or even the explicit IP
I think it depends on how the scripts are being written there. From what I
know, and I could be wrong, you would need to be running something on the
server that would be giving the attacker some method of exploiting things.
Whether this be some kind of control panel, or something. From my
Start by telling us what Linux distribution you're running.
Sounds like Debian but could also be Fedora Core with Apt-get installed.
Try
apt-get remove apache2
and
apt-get remove apache
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Scott S. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Konstantine wrote:
what is @exp_errordir@ that appears in conf file?
Usually path/to/apache2/error
(a collection of 'errordocuments').
are symlinks relevant in Windows env?
yes - they are called Junctions (and function as directory symlinks
only.)
using apache 2.0.54:
my Directory /srv/www/htdocs has Options Indexes FollowSynLinks
all the directories are chmod 755 and files are 644 and are
apache:apache
http://tapintopeace.dyndns.org
why do pages off the index.html pages not work?
/|\
You're saying anything other than the main index on your domain listed
below, doesn't work for you?
They do for me. Your sunshine, sunflower etc... all thosework just fine for
me...
-Original Message-
From: Terry Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005
My Apache 2 server starts automatically whenever I start my computer. Is it
possible to get round this so it only starts when I tell it specifically? I
know I can stop it any time, but others use this computer and I'd rather it
didn't just start up on boot up.
Neil
Yes the music played and I saw pictures. I noticed because it interrupted
Diana Ross in Winamp on my machine and made me upset haha ;D
Right now I can't get anything because either your server is too busy, or
your sites bandwidth is maxed out. I get a connection to apache but it
appears to be
On 9/27/05, Rocky Seelbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clearly a developer question, but I'll ask here first since I'm not
subscribed elsewhere.
We are building a custom module to handle authentication for Apache and
need to configure some parameters for run time. Apache doesn't seem to
care
+++ Station51 Donations [27/09/05 11:19 -0500]:
Start by telling us what Linux distribution you're running.
Sounds like Debian but could also be Fedora Core with Apt-get installed.
I am running Debian 3.1. I run apt-get to install or remove packages, and i
have run apt-get remove apache and
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 16:46, System Administrator wrote:
I'm no expert on security, but it seems odd to me that a remote user
could use apache to write to my /tmp directory and then execute the
script. Any idea how this happened?
Almost certainly through some server extension, such as
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 16:44, Normand Mongeau wrote:
Well I want my back-end API to be protocol neutral, ie not tied to HTTP.
Hence the desire to feed it only XML.
That wasn't the confusing bit. The question was where the XML is coming
from in the first place? If it's from the client,
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 03:36, Jignesh Badani wrote:
Greetings Folks,
We have been running pretty smoothly 3 instances each of Apache2 (2 of
them on 2.0.48 and the 3rd one is running 2.0.51) for over an year now on
2 load balanced Solaris 8 (SunFire 480R 2 - Ultra Sparc 3 900Mhz CPU and
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 18:14, Dr. Scott S. Jones wrote:
I am running Debian 3.1. I run apt-get to install or remove packages, and i
have run apt-get remove apache and apache 2... all apache packages
I know that even after I run remove on them...there are still lots of
apache
Bill Sargent wrote:
Right now I can't get anything because either your server is too busy, or
your sites bandwidth is maxed out. I get a connection to apache but it
appears to be waiting for a response.
maxed out most likely as i only have 1/3 my d/l on this dsl for
uploading...the pages
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:37:16AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Kind of an odd problem but I'm moving my stuff to a new server and for
some reason Apache (2.0.54) is using a lot more memory on the new server
than on the old server.
I'm hosting the same web sites
Did you compile apache yourself?
If you did, did you strip the binary
Strip --strip-unneeded httpd
? That would make the memory footprint smaller I believe.
Stripping libphp4.so as well might save some memory.
Are you using worker mpm or prefork?
(does worker even work on 64?)
Bill Sargent wrote:
Did you compile apache yourself?
If you did, did you strip the binary
Strip --strip-unneeded httpd
? That would make the memory footprint smaller I believe.
Stripping libphp4.so as well might save some memory.
Are you using worker mpm or prefork?
(does worker
Also - reducing MaxRequestsPerChild to 10 makes a dramatic difference
in memory usage. Do I have a memory leak problem?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See
Well if you're running the stock Apache, it should work just fine.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mpm.html
Theres the link to read about MPMs and the different types :) Worker MPM
tends to be good for high traffic sites and saves RAM. Prefork is default
with Apache (Not sure about precompiled
Hello,
I have a very unusual problem running httpd 1.3.27 on Solaris 2.8. The
daemon is forking and consuming 80-95% of the CPU and meanwhile requests
are just hanging. Nothing seems to be making it into the logs. We're
totally perplexed about this one. Unfortunately these production
My site is fairly high traffic. about 20 gigs an hour. 60 requests a
second. Apparently I'm using prefork. Do you think MPMs would be the
better choice?
Bill Sargent wrote:
Well if you're running the stock Apache, it should work just fine.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mpm.html
Neil Conduit wrote:
My Apache 2 server starts automatically whenever I start my computer. Is
it possible to get round this so it only starts when I tell it
specifically? I know I can stop it any time, but others use this
computer and I'd rather it didn't just start up on boot up.
This would
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 19:59, Marc Perkel wrote:
My site is fairly high traffic. about 20 gigs an hour. 60 requests a
second. Apparently I'm using prefork. Do you think MPMs would be the
better choice?
Worker would reduce memory usage. But worker is more fussy than prefork
about working
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 19:59, Marc Perkel wrote:
My site is fairly high traffic. about 20 gigs an hour. 60 requests a
second. Apparently I'm using prefork. Do you think MPMs would be the
better choice?
Worker would reduce memory usage. But
Hello, all.
I am using this code:
RewriteEngine On
Options +FollowSymlinks
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} onlinemall.website.com
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !onlinemall/
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ onlinemall/$1 [L]
It was working recently and now it isn't. I even placed it in httpd.conf and
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - thanks for your help. I do use PHP and I don't want to crash. ;)
But - unless I keep MaxRequestsPerChild at no more than 10 the memory
usage grows fast. Could I have a memory leak of some kind?
Holey Moley! MaxRequestsPerChild 10 ! Yeah, sounds like a nasty
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mpm_common.html#serverlimit
I would recommend looking at this as well.
Not sure if you already have a serverlimit in place.
Btw, what IS your max clients?
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005
Thanks Nick,
If they started misbehaving, what has changed? Any system libraries?
Kernel? Hardware and/or drivers? And if so, have you rebuilt apache
from clean source?
ANSWER: Nothing has changed apart from the OS patches from time to time.
And nothing recently. Also this problem has
Running Apache with RedHat 8.0 (Psyche), Kernel 2.4.18-24.8.0 on an
i686, not installed by me. Would someone please point me in the right
direction to find my error and correct it?
All had been running well until we added a new website. We were having
trouble getting it out on the web. I
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - thanks for your help. I do use PHP and I don't want to crash. ;)
But - unless I keep MaxRequestsPerChild at no more than 10 the memory
usage grows fast. Could I have a memory leak of some kind?
Holey Moley!
Look for the NameVirtualHost directive, above where your VirtualHosts are
defined. It needs the IP address of the box. That's what the error
message below is telling you.
It's easy to misread this into thinking it's talking about the same
VirtualHost directives you quoted.
Sep 27 12:56:28
Thanks Geoff,
Out of interest, what SSL session cache type are you using on these
hosts?
shmcb?
Cheers,
Geoff
We are using the default dbm on all 3 Apache instances.
We have had some shared memory errors when using shm* in the past and
reverted back to the default DBM.
regards
- - - -
I read through the entire /etc/httpd/conf /httpd.conf and found no place
to put the IP in. In the windows version, in the http server, all
the Virtual Hosts are name based. I cannot add an IP without changing
them to IP based and that won't work (I don't think) since they would
all have
Take a look at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.1/vhosts. Although this is
specific to Apache 2.1+, there are similar pages for each major version.
Find yours.
The lines you quoted originally actually had a couple of issues.
Specifically, in order to do name based virtual hosting you need this
It looks like I gave you bum info on the use of _default_. Doesn't look
like you can use it.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.1/vhosts/name-based.html has all the right
answers.
I read through the entire /etc/httpd/conf /httpd.conf and found no place
to put the IP in. In the windows version,
Sep 27 12:56:28 midnight httpd: Syntax error on line 907 of
etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
Sep 27 12:56:28 midnight httpd: NameVirtualHost takes one argument, A
numeric IP address:port, or the name of a host
Well, this seems pretty clear:
VirtualHost
This is missing an argument.
I assume you
Rocky Seelbach wrote:
Take a look at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.1/vhosts. Although this is
specific to Apache 2.1+, there are similar pages for each major version.
Find yours.
OK, I read through that. If I understand correctly, I have two options
(correct me please):
I can put the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read through the entire /etc/httpd/conf /httpd.conf and found no place
to put the IP in. In the windows version, in the http server, all
the Virtual Hosts are name based. I cannot add an IP without changing
them to IP based and that won't work (I don't think)
Rocky Seelbach wrote:
Take a look at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.1/vhosts. Although this is
specific to Apache 2.1+, there are similar pages for each major version.
Find yours.
The lines you quoted originally actually had a couple of issues.
Specifically, in order to do name based
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went back through
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf and found where to put the IP. Got that done
so now my upset customer can at least get his email, but the websites
are not up. I know that is because the Document Root is not
/var/www/html/foo. Is it safe to just
Jessica Rasku wrote:
It really doesn't matter which way you do it, there are reasons for
creating symlinks (when two programs are looking for the same data in
two different places is the ideal time for a symlink rather than
duplicating the data, another option would be to get one of the
Hello,
I have been working for a while trying to get Nagios working with
apache. This is the .htaccess configuration for the directory that the
cgis are in:
AuthName Nagios Access
AuthType Basic
#AuthScriptURI /htlogin/ldap.php?filter=nagios
require valid-user
AuthUserFile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jessica Rasku wrote:
It really doesn't matter which way you do it, there are reasons for
creating symlinks (when two programs are looking for the same data in
two different places is the ideal time for a symlink rather than
duplicating the data, another option
On 9/27/05, Terence Burnard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have been working for a while trying to get Nagios working with
apache. This is the .htaccess configuration for the directory that the
cgis are in:
AuthName Nagios Access
AuthType Basic
#AuthScriptURI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jessica Rasku wrote:
It really doesn't matter which way you do it, there are reasons for
creating symlinks (when two programs are looking for the same data in
two different places is the ideal time for a symlink rather than
duplicating the data, another option
OK, I put in NameVirtualHost 216.107.115.123:80, and put
VirtualHost *:80 in one of the websites, then restarted
apache. I still get the warning below,
[warn] NameVirtualHost 216.107.115.123:80 has
no VirtualHosts
but I must be on the right track. When I try to access the sites now,
I
Jessica Rasku wrote:
And as a sample Virtual host I have:
VirtualHost *:80
DocumentRoot /var/www/gender/html
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ServerName genderoutlaws.com
ServerAlias *.genderoutlaws.com
DirectoryIndex index.php index.html index.htm
It was thus said that the Great [EMAIL PROTECTED] once stated:
I can put the IP of the box just under the ServerName?
(from /etc/httpd/conf /httpd.conf)
# If this is not set to valid DNS name for your host, server-generated
# redirections will not work. See also the UseCanonicalName
Hi!,
I am embedding my .Net user controls ( created through Class library
template) in HTML object tag.
But the user control is not getting downloaded in IE 6.0
I created and compiled my dll using the .Net Framework and placed it
along with the HTML in
the ROOT directory of Tomcat Web
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I put in NameVirtualHost 216.107.115.123:80, and put VirtualHost
*:80 in one of the websites, then restarted apache. I still get the
warning below,
Is there a reason that you want 216.107.115.123 only IP address that
these sites are available from? Do you have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following your sample, after setting the NameVirtualHost
# Use name-based virtual hosting.
#
NameVirtualHost 216.107.115.123:80
I made one site look like this:
# Virtual host evergreenequikits.com
VirtualHost *:80
DocumentRoot
Hallo zusammen,
ich verwende an einer Stelle eine RewriteRule in der Form:
RewriteRule ^/dir/(.+)$ /script.php?param=$1[N,P]
Der Apache läuft als prefork. Wenn ich auf diesem Weg eine große Datei
downloade kann ich dabei beobachten das der Apache die Größe der Datei an
RAM verbraucht - ohne
Moin Andreas,
Das [P] ist doch grad das Proxy Throughput Flag, speichert also die von
hinten geholten Daten im RAM und/oder auf Platte zwischen für spätere Abrufe.
Wenn Du gar nicht möchtest das die Daten im Apache gecached werden kannst Du
den Proxy entsprechend konfigurieren das insgesamt
Hallo Carsten,
da habe ich schon geschaut und nichts gefunden was da etwas bringen würde.
mod_cache ist auch nicht geladen - daher dürfte das auch nix cachen. Das
würde ich ja verstehen wenn mod_cache geladen wäre - aber auch da wäre es
merkwürdig das er z.B. 80MB Daten im RAM zwischenpuffert.
Wie gesagt, mod_proxy und mod_cache und wasweissichnoch mod_disk_cache etc.
alle laden und sauber konfigurieren, so solltest Du das in den Griff kriegen.
Nicht sicher ob ganz ohne Konfig der mods nicht irgendeine Standardeinstellung
nimmt. /Carsten
-Original Message-
From: Andreas
78 matches
Mail list logo
