Re: [RCU] Update 1.6.2 released - change classic I/F a bit . .

Am 04.07.2023 08:03, schrieb Philip Rhoades: > On 2023-07-04 09:03, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Ah, now I see what you mean. Yeah, that would be an idea, but I'm afraid the >> devs won't do anything on the Classic interface anymore. > > I thought that might be the

Re: [RCU] Update 1.6.2 released - change classic I/F a bit . .

Ah, now I see what you mean. Yeah, that would be an idea, but I'm afraid the devs won't do anything on the Classic interface anymore. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 03.07.2023 03:52, schrieb Philip Rhoades: > Michael, > > > On 202

Re: [RCU] Update 1.6.2 released

mailing list So a standard reply would go to you personally only. Is this your intention? At least I did change the recipient(s) so that this message will also go to the list. Brgds, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 02.07.2023 19:33, schrieb Philip Rhoades: &

Re: [RCU] Auto switching between "Interface skins" ?

but probably there are separate skin packages available. Will see if I may get used to Elastic some day on the desktop as well, but I definitely miss the "Desktop (wide list and malil preview below)" option in Elastic. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany __

Re: [RCU] Auto switching between "Interface skins" ?

Great, thanks Nathan! Will test this. As it's from Thomas, it should work. :) -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 12.10.2022 20:51, schrieb Nathan Coulson: > We use https://github.com/thomascube/roundcube-elastic4mobile for this, > seems to work

Re: [RCU] Auto switching between "Interface skins" ?

, config option or something else? Phlip Rhoades raised the same question 3 and 1½ years ago already, but there were no answers to his posts. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 18.03.2021 06:51, schrieb Philip Rhoades: > People, > > On my PC I use th

[RCU] managesieve and 'editheader' extension

e commands of the 'editheader' extension? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] 1.3-git [GIT 20160820.1942] broken (can't send mail anymore)

ugin. An update to 2.1-git solved the problem. I'm wondering how this could be automated... Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] 1.3-git [GIT 20160820.1942] broken (can't send mail anymore)

Am 21.08.2016 19:02, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 08/21/2016 04:05 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> But I'm using it as my production branch for a long while already, because >> I have to: Some things do not work (or work different) in the stable >> version - e.g. the ident

Re: [RCU] 1.3-git [GIT 20160820.1942] broken (can't send mail anymore)

Am 21.08.2016 11:52, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 08/20/2016 11:08 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Apparently due to the commit quoted below, I (and not only me) can't send >> mail with 1.3-git anymore. I'm seeing a huge attachment window area, but no >> editor w

[RCU] 1.3-git [GIT 20160820.1942] broken (can't send mail anymore)

to test at least this particular function before committing? Composing and sending a message is quite an essential feature of a webmail client. ;) Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany > From git://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail >9debc38..2225cf1 mast

[RCU] 1.3-git [GIT 20160820.1942] broken (can't send mail anymore)

committing? Composing and sending a message is quite an essential feature of a webmail client. ;) Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany > From git://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail >9debc38..2225cf1 master -> origin/master >2fdb9c4..0e7d5a6 release

Re: [RCU] Error "Invalid request! No data was saved."

Am 24.09.2015 09:16, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 09/23/2015 10:53 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> But I'm hoping that one of the devs will shed some light on it, as to when >> this error will occur. I'm seeing it for a few weeks now. > > "Invalid request! No dat

Re: [RCU] Error "Invalid request! No data was saved."

ta was saved. > > [...] > > Could it be that this is related to the fact that I run roundcube behind > a reverse proxy? I don't think so, as this is not the case here. But I'm hoping that one of the devs will shed some light on it, as to when this error will occur. I

Re: [RCU] Error "Invalid request! No data was saved."

I can confirm this issue. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 14.09.2015 10:24, schrieb Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff: > Hi, > > I've been struggling with the following error for quite some time: > >> Invalid request! No data was saved

Re: [RCU] Dashes all of a sudden prepended to HTML signature

Am 30.08.2015 21:06, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Am 30.08.2015 18:42, schrieb A.L.E.C: >> On 08/30/2015 05:09 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>> See subject. All of a sudden (= since today) dashes are prepended to a HTML >>> signature...?! Two when composing a new m

Re: [RCU] Dashes all of a sudden prepended to HTML signature

Am 30.08.2015 18:42, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 08/30/2015 05:09 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> See subject. All of a sudden (= since today) dashes are prepended to a HTML >> signature...?! Two when composing a new message, three upon replying. >> >> My signatures do con

[RCU] Dashes all of a sudden prepended to HTML signature

at? And if so, why does it apply to HTML sigs only then? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Search across all folders does not search across all folders

Am 18.08.2015 08:14, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 08/17/2015 10:07 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Hmm, not sure if I got you right and what you mean with "close the search >> menu" - clicking on the cross on the right which says "Reset search"? > > No, the

Re: [RCU] Search across all folders does not search across all folders

Am 16.08.2015 19:41, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 08/16/2015 06:55 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>> Just did a search for a specific string in the "From" AND the "To" header >>> across all folders, but only the messages with the string in the "From"

Re: [RCU] Search across all folders does not search across all folders

Am 15.08.2015 09:45, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 08/14/2015 11:58 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Furthermore, I just realized that a search across all folders does not >> search across all folders. >> >> If a more in-depth description is required, please let me know. > &g

[RCU] Search across all folders does not search across all folders (was: Search function for messages with "To" addresses finds messages with "From" addresses (only))

Furthermore, I just realized that a search across all folders does not search across all folders. If a more in-depth description is required, please let me know. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 14.08.2015 22:04, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Just wan

Re: [RCU] Search function for messages with "To" addresses finds messages with "From" addresses (only)

han me using this function, or am I the only one realizing this issue...? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 24.06.2015 18:58, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Just had this issue: > > Initiated a search for messages across all folders with "df

[RCU] Search function for messages with "To" addresses finds messages with "From" addresses (only)

Just had this issue: Initiated a search for messages across all folders with "df.eu" in the "To" header. The search result returned all messages with "df.eu" in the "From" header instead?! Apparently this is an issue if searching across all folders only.

Re: [RCU] Identity selection broken

Am 22.06.2015 09:56, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/22/2015 01:17 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Hmm, strange... All of a sudden the identity selection routine seems to be >> broken, currently all replies are being sent from my default identity >> (unless I change it manually).

[RCU] Identity selection broken (was: Reply to own messages broken...?)

been fixed - and there the identity selection did still work. But I also can't find a commit in the SVN list which could be related to that...?! Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 19.06.2015 23:49, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Am 18.06.2015 20:59, schrieb

Re: [RCU] Reply to own messages broken...?

Am 18.06.2015 20:59, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/16/2015 06:57 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> just did set up some mail accounts for a new user and did realize that >> replies to an own message are being sent to the own address of the original >> sender rather than to the ad

Re: [RCU] Reply to own messages broken...?

Hi Mike, Am 17.06.2015 18:13, schrieb Mike Burger: > On 2015-06-16 7:27 pm, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> Am 16.06.2015 19:11, schrieb Mike Burger: >> >>> On 2015-06-16 12:57 pm, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> &g

Re: [RCU] Text signature vs. HTML signature

Am 17.06.2015 08:52, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/16/2015 06:39 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Response would be nice. ;) > > #1490437: Html2Text: Disable links list in some cases > #1490436: Html2Text: multi-  is converted to one space > #1490435: Plain text signature textarea

Re: [RCU] Reply to own messages broken...?

Hi Mike, Am 16.06.2015 19:11, schrieb Mike Burger: > On 2015-06-16 12:57 pm, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just did set up some mail accounts for a new user and did realize that >> replies to an own message are being sent to the own address of the original &

[RCU] Reply to own messages broken...?

Hi, just did set up some mail accounts for a new user and did realize that replies to an own message are being sent to the own address of the original sender rather than to the address of the original recipient. This still works: - 1) > From: Michael Heydekamp > Displa

Re: [RCU] Text signature vs. HTML signature

Response would be nice. ;) Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 13.06.2015 20:59, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Am 13.06.2015 08:52, schrieb A.L.E.C: > >> Just a note: the checkbox does "convert to another format" not "get back >&g

Re: [RCU] Text signature vs. HTML signature

l different issues but which are connected to each other. Would it be OK to just mention the key word "HTML signature" and then you'll recall what it's all about...? ;) Or should I paste this entire conversation? Anayway, my original purpose was to use a text and a HTML signatur

[RCU] Text signature vs. HTML signature

ore senseless links! And so on... As I said, I don't get it. What's that for...? Can somebody explain? The creation of the body of HTML messages seems to even worse, but that's a different issue for a different thread then. Any help appreciated. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp

Re: [RCU] Recipient selection with mouse currently not working in git-master

Am 09.06.2014 12:33, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/09/2014 01:40 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Well, yes, thanks for the fix (confirmed, BTW). But when you're doing such >> kind of major changes - don't you test them before committing them...? > > We do, however

Re: [RCU] Recipient selection with mouse currently not working in git-master

Am 08.06.2014 11:30, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/06/2014 09:49 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Typing a part of the recipient's name/address in any address field, I'm >> seeing a number of possible selections. But I can't select any of them with >> the mous

[RCU] Recipient selection with mouse currently not working in git-master

on doesn't work anymore. Win7/64, FF 27.0.1, RC 1.1-git [GIT 20140605.2017]. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Order of folders cluttered

Am 04.06.2014 20:21, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Am 04.06.2014 10:45, schrieb A.L.E.C: >> On 06/03/2014 08:16 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> >>> All special folders here are named this way: >>> >>> INBOX (= Inbox) >>> INBOX.Sent (= Sent

Re: [RCU] Order of folders cluttered

Am 04.06.2014 10:45, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/03/2014 08:16 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> All special folders here are named this way: >> >> INBOX (= Inbox) >> INBOX.Sent (= Sent) >> etc. ... > > That's it. Should be fixed in git now. I&#

Re: [RCU] Order of folders cluttered

Am 02.06.2014 08:14, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/01/2014 10:36 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> See screenshot attached (where "Posteingang" = Inbox, "Entwürfe" = Draft, >> "Spam" = Junk, "Gesendet" = Sent, and "Gelöscht" = Tr

Re: [RCU] Order of folders cluttered

Am 01.06.2014 14:22, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 06/01/2014 12:03 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Anyway, why does RC touch any sorting at all? I remember that we had defined >> a default sorting for the special folders for all of our users in the main >> config a while a

Re: [RCU] Order of folders cluttered

reating a new user. At least this is how I remember it. This sorting should be kept no matter what, shouldn't it? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Order of folders cluttered

Am 27.05.2014 08:06, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 05/26/2014 10:31 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Gentoo Linux >> PHP 5.4.9 (cli) (built: Nov 23 2012 14:04:22) >> LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-1 >> LC_ALL=de_DE.ISO8859-1 > > Not really. What language in Roundcube UI? Do

Re: [RCU] Order of folders cluttered

Am 25.05.2014 12:07, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 05/23/2014 10:33 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> I don't know how that happened, but all of a sudden the order my mail >> folders is totally f*cked up (e.g. the Trash folder being the very last of >> all folders rather th

[RCU] Order of folders cluttered

and how to change the order of folders at all (apart from manually fiddling around with settings in the database). Is there a way...? Cheers -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcub

Re: [RCU] No history in searchbox with Firefox anymore?

Am 15.01.2014 21:34, schrieb Andreas Meyer: > Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> As there came no response anymore to the message below: >> >> Does anyone of the FF users here have a history in the Roundcube search >> field? And if so, with which FF version? > &g

Re: [RCU] No history in searchbox with Firefox anymore?

As there came no response anymore to the message below: Does anyone of the FF users here have a history in the Roundcube search field? And if so, with which FF version? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 14.01.2014 01:00, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: >

Re: [RCU] No history in searchbox with Firefox anymore?

Am 13.01.2014 22:00, schrieb Hartmut Steffin: > On 13.01.2014 21:06, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> When using IE, I always had a history in the Roundcube searchbox (the >> previous search terms were displayed and selectable upon typing). >> >> Now, with FF 26, this

[RCU] No history in searchbox with Firefox anymore?

When using IE, I always had a history in the Roundcube searchbox (the previous search terms were displayed and selectable upon typing). Now, with FF 26, this function is gone, and I didn't find any setting to get it back. Any idea? Is this an RC or an FF issue? Cheers, -- Michael Heydeka

Re: [RCU] ipad cannot display some emails: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit and Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

gt; ISO-8859-15 -> Windows-1252 -> UTF-8 But that doesn't mean that UTF-8 is wrong, if e.g. US-ASCII would match. > The receiving end is fairly justified in rejecting this and complaining > loudly. No, definitely not. See above. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] ipad cannot display some emails: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit and Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Am 21.11.2013 16:40, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > That is not correct. If a message is qp-encoded, UTF-8 and 7bit can make > perfect sense. Sorry for sloppy phrasing, qp is by definition 7bit, of course. > But even if the message is NOT qp-encoded and does NOT > contain any hi-bi

Re: [RCU] New tab "Responses" in 1.0-git

Am 07.11.2013 20:22, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: > Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Hmm, shouldn't we better call it "Templates" or something? I mean, when >> composing a message, it is not necessarily a "response". > > Templates might trigger wrong

Re: [RCU] New tab "Responses" in 1.0-git

Am 07.11.2013 19:49, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 11/07/2013 07:45 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Accidentally I just realized that there is a new tab "Responses" in 1.0-git. >> What is it good for? > > Text snippets you can save and use in mail compose. There'

[RCU] New tab "Responses" in 1.0-git

Accidentally I just realized that there is a new tab "Responses" in 1.0-git. What is it good for? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.rou

Re: [RCU] custom headers

but that there is no plugin available for this purpose yet, does also surprise me. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Search result eliminated upon replying in 1.0-git?

Am 21.09.2013 08:42, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 09/20/2013 09:40 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>> A bug. >> >> Ok. Ticket required? > > Yes. "No ticket, no issue". As you know, there were other issues before which had been fixed before I even had the chance to

Re: [RCU] Search result eliminated upon replying in 1.0-git?

Am 20.09.2013 09:08, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 09/18/2013 10:40 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Replicable? Bug or deliberate...? > > A bug. Ok. Ticket required? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___

[RCU] Search result eliminated upon replying in 1.0-git?

.g. selecting a different folder than the Sent folder), but the scenario above was the one where I encountered the behaviour. Replicable? Bug or deliberate...? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mai

Re: [RCU] Special Characters help

$, BTW) > not really a roundcube question Indeed! Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] [RCD] bb5d72: Use also Envelope-To for identity selection (#1488...

Am 02.07.2013 21:02, schrieb Justin van Beusekom: > You can provide an patch: > > https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/pulls Thanks. But if I'm getting right, this is more a patch request rather than a real and direct commit to the source, right? Cheers, -- Michael Heyd

Re: [RCU] Displaying folder names in dependence of splitter position

Am 02.07.2013 20:28, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 07/02/2013 07:57 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> Hmm, unlikely. All scenarios I described in my previous post have been >> encountered with the very same browser and browser version (IE >> 8.0.7601.17514) which hasn't -

Re: [RCU] Displaying folder names in dependence of splitter position

Am 02.07.2013 09:02, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 07/01/2013 10:38 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Is this deliberate...? >> >> Browser: IE8 > > Works for me with Firefox, so it might be IE-only problem. Hmm, unlikely. All scenarios I described in my previous post have bee

[RCU] Displaying folder names in dependence of splitter position

ncated in the display). Today, both versions (0.9.2 [GIT 20130630.1129] and 1.0-git [GIT 20130701.1430]) behave the same as described under "1.0-git" above (folder name being truncated rather than shortened). Is this deliberate...? Browser: IE8 Cheers, -- Michael Heydeka

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 19.03.2013 20:26, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > It worked again. Now I have to find out why and under wich circumstances it > didn't work yesterday. :-/ > > Stay tuned. @alec: After some more local tests, I must admit that even I can't reproduce the issue anymore t

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 19.03.2013 20:22, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Now we take the original test again: > >> 34567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456 > xxxä x xxx x xxxäx xx x xx xx > xx. x x xxx

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 19.03.2013 20:08, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Let's see and count (I'm preceding the next line with a quote char just to > prevent any wrapping of this "count line"): > >> 34567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456 > x x x

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 19.03.2013 09:23, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 03/19/2013 12:35 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >> So something has been "fixed" in step #2, although there was nothing to fix, >> because everything was correct already (but isn't now correct anymore). The >> c

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 18.03.2013 19:54, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 01/19/2013 07:00 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> I believe this might be a simple counting problem: In step #2, RC is >> counting characters only and inserts an LF after pos. 76. In step #4, RC >> counts the already existing LF (wh

[RCU] Line wrapping (was: Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying)

Am 21.01.2013 08:42, schrieb A.L.E.C: > Yes, I didn't really read about your issue. [...] Would you mind to do it? -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.

Re: [RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying

Am 21.01.2013 08:42, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 01/20/2013 09:06 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Due to my lack of PHP skills, I don't get an idea what these fixes are >> doing. Can you describe what the change in the behaviour is (or which >> additional scenarios are now

Re: [RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying

Am 20.01.2013 11:17, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 01/19/2013 08:09 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > >>> +&& strlen($line[$last]) > 1 // don't hit if line only >>> consist of one single white space > > This line is just wrong, there shou

Re: [RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying

WSP? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 19.01.2013 01:17, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > Am 18.01.2013 21:31, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: > >> OK, got it: >> >> Quoted empty lines "> " have a trailing space > > Well, not always

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 18.01.2013 20:29, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: The message quoted below sounds ridiculous, as both texts do look exacly the same. The reason apparently is that I copied the first paragraph from the original mail being in the Sent

Re: [RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

s, please > report. Sure, trust me. ;) (And thanks again) Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

Am 18.01.2013 20:45, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> As anyone can see, replying to the message quoted below (and attached) does >> delete all quoted (!) blank lines in Thomas' announcement. > > I can repro

Re: [RCU] Why is "From " at the beginning of a line always preceded with a quote char? (was: Reply-To issues again)

Am 18.01.2013 20:17, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> See subject. Quoting "From " is mbox specific, AFAIR, but what do we have >> to do with mbox...? >> >> The much better question is: WTF is adding

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 18.01.2013 20:29, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: > However, I generally fail to understand and reproduce your problem. > Could you describe exactly what you did step by step? I definitely will, but not tonight anymore. ;) Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/G

Re: [RCU] increase attachment filesize

e values in any php.ini. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

Am 16.01.2013 08:19, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 01/15/2013 08:04 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Roundcube decides to respect "Mail-Reply-To:" and to ignore "Reply-To:". > > This chunk of code tells everything. What's wrong here in your opinion? As I said: T

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

Am 16.01.2013 20:52, schrieb Cor Bosman: > On Jan 16, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Am 16.01.2013 12:42, schrieb Cor Bosman: >>> The response will only go to michael, and not to the list unless you do >>> reply-all. >> >> But then it still

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

s message. It IS a problem. If you still can't see it, please answer the following: Why should Mailman add the list address to the "Reply-To:" header, if it wouldn't want to make sure that any reply shall also go to the list? RC's current behaviour does clearly break

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

Sorry for being late, but I'll have to work during the day. ;) Am 16.01.2013 03:23, schrieb Cor Bosman: > On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >> Am 15.01.2013 22:05, schrieb Cor Bosman: >> >>> But why are you saying roundcube is the one adding it? &

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.2 - please ignore

Am 15.01.2013 23:58, schrieb Reindl Harald: > what the hell > can you PLEASE test your roundcube setup OFFLIST No. > if roundcube adds whatever header One of the questions was if the list does change/add any headers. And it DOES. Go to bed, Harald, and have a good night. Cheers, --

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

t;) at all. More analysis tomorrow. I'm tired. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.2 - please ignore

Entry under "Identities/Reply-To": ------ > Michael Heydekamp , Roundcube Users mailing list > Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder): ----- >

[RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.1 - please ignore

Entry under "Identities/Reply-To": ------ > Michael Heydekamp , Roundcube Users mailing list > Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder): ----- >

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #1.2 - please ignore

Entry under "Identities/Reply-To": ------ > Michael Heydekamp Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder): - > Reply-To: Michael Heydekamp > Mai

[RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #1.1 - please ignore

Entry under "Identities/Reply-To": ------ > Michael Heydekamp Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder): - > Reply-To: Michael Heydekamp > Mai

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

> Roundcube Users mailing list -- So where's the beef to have a (incorrect and incomplete) "Mail-Reply-To:" header, when there is already a (complete and correct) "Reply-To

Re: [RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

Grmpf, I attached the wrong message, sorry. Correct message now attached. When replying to it, all blank quoted lines get lost. -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 15.01.2013 20:39, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: > As anyone can see, replying to the message quoted be

[RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

only blank?) quoted lines"), so far with no response. I strongly believe that both scenarios share the same cause. Ticket wanted...? -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 13.01.2013 12:40, schrieb Philip Rhoades: > Thomas, > > Looking good! Updated fro

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

Am 15.01.2013 18:12, schrieb Kaz Kylheku: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:13:25 +0100, Michael Heydekamp > wrote: >> xxxä x xxx x xxxäx xx x xx xx >> xx. x x xx xx.xx. xx , xx xxx >>

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

On 15.01.2013 19:48, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 15.01.2013 19:40, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: >> A reply to the message quoted below (and attached) does NOT go to the list >> upon clicking the "Reply to sender" button - it goes to the address stated >> in the Mail

[RCU] Why is "From " at the beginning of a line always preceded with a quote char? (was: Reply-To issues again)

On 15.01.2013 19:40, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>From my point of view, you shouldn't and can't expect the Roundcube user to > first inspect all headers before clicking the Reply button. [...] See subject. Quoting "From " is mbox specific, AFAIR, but what do we have

[RCU] Reply-To issues again (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

don't care what Mozilla does, even these folks are not doing everything right. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 15.01.2013 16:59, schrieb Philip Rhoades: > People, > > I know it is bad form to reply to yourself but now I have found a few issues: &

Re: [RCU] [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download

st address manually. Both issues are bugs, I'd say. Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

p before pos. #76 anymore. Hope I've made myself clear...? -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany On 15.01.2013 00:59, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > When I'm sending a plain text message (8bit-chars intentionally unchanged, > as this might probably play a role, al

[RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

line wrap there, right? And if there should be a reason, why doesn't it apply to the original mail then? Ticket required? Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [RCU] "Show first set" arrow/button disappears if too many messages (and therefore string too long)

Am 02.01.2013 19:09, schrieb A.L.E.C: > Ok. Confirmed with IE8. No problem in IE9 and other browsers. Feel free > to create a ticket. Done. -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany ___ Roundcube Users mailing list

Re: [RCU] "Show first set" arrow/button disappears if too many messages (and therefore string too long)

Am 02.01.2013 08:05, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 01/02/2013 01:49 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>> I'm gonna send a screenshot later on to illustrate the problem. >> >> See attached. > > what browser? Ah, ok: Still IE8 under Win7/64. Thought that would be commo

  1   2   >