James,
In NiFi 1.x line we introduced the variable registry concept for
exactly this purpose. Right now it reads from a properties file but we
intend to also grow this to support other more dynamic/central
options.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2208
pecification document in the wiki is written in future tense, but is it
> in fact what got implemented in the two jiras (all linked below)?
> Thanks,
> --Matt
>
> On 3/24/17, 5:50 AM, "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> James,
>
> In Ni
you disagree. -Jim
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> jim - definitely take the time to walk through the best practices
>> guide. Some are more like "if you dont do this it will probably kill
>> the process - pr
false in your nifi.properties.
>>> Depending on how your flow and scripts are constructed, this may allow you
>>> to piecewise alleviate any large queues/processing of files that could be
>>> causing the issue at hand. You could additionally bypass the possible
>
thanks for following up with the resolution!
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Bram vd Klinkenberg
wrote:
> Solved it!
>
>
> I used CN=admin with the toolkit and cn=admin in the users.xml Changed
> this to CN=admin and works fine now :).
>
>
>
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Russ
>
> On 03/24/2017 11:07 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
> We made our initial capability available but we still have more work
> to go to reach the full vision of that feature proposal/vision as well
> as related visions for extensions and flow versions.
Dan
No but we really do need to push it as many folks have asked. I'll try my
best to start swirling the release management process soon.
Thanks
Joe
On Mar 22, 2017 6:34 PM, "dan young" wrote:
Any update on when 1.2 might be released into the wild?
Regards,
Dano
o
> monitor it's upper bound so that stuff doesn't get corrupted when the disk
> fills up.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike.
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mike
>>
>> It looks like the flow file repo has partial w
Mike
It looks like the flow file repo has partial written data at the end and is
problematic on restart. Strongly recommend configuring per best practices
and making sure the flow file repo in particular is in its own logical
partition. Also, we can make that more resilient on startup and there
t;.
> Coincidentally we are having to meet similar requirement.
>
> Our solution was to get that through restAPI but if there is a cleaner way
> though reporting tasks, would like to experiment with that too.
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:09 AM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wro
; What is meant by the following statement: "From that one can access the list
> of changes from a given offset onward."
> ReportingTask.java is an interface class. That does mean there exists a class
> specifically for reporting configuration changes?
>
> Regards John
>
&g
definitely agree with Juan's suggestion to get more details on what
the actual authentication process is when trying ssh -vvv. Also, be
sure to check what order of authorization occurs. It is possible it
is trying keyboard-interactive before the certs and this could create
problems so ordering
Hello
This has been addressed in NiFi 1.x. You can have multiple writers to
various things in parallel and it handles it nicely.
Thanks
Joe
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:03 PM, James McMahon wrote:
> We have multiple people working is separate distinct processor groups
pdate the documentation to
> make it a little clearer? Let me know and I will take a crack at expandign
> the information to help other users.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim K.
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:31 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> defi
at 5:08 PM, James Keeney <nextves...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks again. When you refer to live queue listing and data viewing what are
> you referring to? The dashboard or something else.
>
> Jim K.
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:49 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
&
Much of this goodness can be found in the help->Users Guide.
Adjusting run durection/scheduling factors:
https://nifi.apache.org/docs/nifi-docs/html/user-guide.html#scheduling-tab
These are the latest docs but I'm sure there is coverage in the older stuff.
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:23
There are a number of things you can do for a given flow to improve
its performance:
- Add tasks to the component(s)
- Adjust scheduling period
- Add threads to the controller overall
- Adjust the run duration to tell nifi you are willing to trade small
latency for higher throughput
Be sure your
John
To build on Andrew's comments there is already a very significant
amount of audit data made available for flow changes. We store this
in an audit database so we can drive some user experiences off it and
we make it available via reporting tasks so one could report this
information to an
Hello
Did the partition nifi use get full? We are making the error handling in
such case more resilient as at time it can result in partial writes.
Joe
Thanks
Joe
On Apr 14, 2017 5:06 PM, "Ravi Papisetti (rpapiset)"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> NiFi version: 1.1.2, Linux
>
>
>
>
s,
>
> Ravi Papisetti
>
>
>
> From: Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
> Date: Friday, April 14, 2017 at 5:48 PM
> To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: NiFi fa
Brian,
This is a tough question to respond to meaningfully as it is pretty
open ended. You're right that often different flows created by
different people will varying levels of optimization, efficiency,
simplicity, and so on much like written code.
One of the aspects that helps here is the
he logstash processing work to nifi, we want to move the
>>> netflow parsing to nifi too.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/logstash-plugins/logstash-codec-netflow
>>>
>>> http://blogs.cisco.com/security/step-by-step-setup-of-elk-for-netflow-analytics
>>>
>
Hello
It appears to be throwing an NPE when establishing the position of the
component you're trying to add. While clearly an unfriendly error
message as-is did you specify the position in your request?
Thanks
JOe
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Pushkara R wrote:
>
Hello
UnpackContent is for archive formats. gzip/snappy/lz4 aren't archive
formats but are compression types. You want CompressContent in
decompress mode. I think the first question is why they didn't
decompress. Did you verify the were indeed still compressed? You can
use IdentifyMimeType
You're right that the generation and indexing of provenance data
creates overhead. We've put considerable effort in minimizing that
overhead to a point where you should not have to think about it and
still get all the powerful user experience/auditing gains it provides.
However, when you're
We also use it for troubleshooting as we can see the nifi attributes (
> metadata ) and its content ( if configured )
>
> You can also use provenance to "replay" your data at specific points during
> its dataflow life cycle.
>
> Please reference similar answer given on s
I think this is an important concept. We should have something
meaning deprecated but with redirectors to better options. We have
'SeeAlso' for docs so something similar.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Juan Sequeiros wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Lately I've been discussing
in I understood clearly: I should go ahead and rm -rf
> ./provenance_repository? Won't the problem just reappear again as soon as it
> recreates provenance_repository at start up?
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jim
>>
Actually in following the referenced PR to the JIRA it references it
appears it went out in Apache NiFi 0.7.1 as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2429. So if you can get
onto that version it should address that condition.
Thanks
Joe
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Joe Witt <jo
Jim,
Processors create provenance events which get written to the
provenenance repo but that is the end of their relationship. The
provenance repository is then self managing. Can you share your
nifi.properties provenance configuration?
Thanks
Joe
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:05 PM, James
Purbon
The MergeContent processor supports merging data using a correlation
key. The processor does not support SQL style inner/outer joins as it
is not joining data based on per record/tuple type logic but rather at
a per flowfile level. We can correlated based on any flowfile
attribute or
Juan,
I think RouteText is the right answer. It would indeed need to check
all lines to determine whether the condition is satisfied and to
remove the first line it will need to write out all the remaining
lines. If a majority of the input files do not have this problematic
header I'd use
Uwe
To progress toward a pull request for inclusion in the nifi community
we will need a LICENSE/NOTICE to end up in the nar bundle itself. You
can see many examples of this in other nars such as [1]
If you don't need to edit the LICENSE you can not provide it and a
default one will be
Ryan,
We had a very similar question just a bit ago.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1289510c6d69176907273be08f1d1548182af6bdec0c4f51dee1c38b@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ryan H
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am
t is getting created is /www/files/newfile.txt and not
> /www/files/test/newfile.txt
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Jim K.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:19 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jim,
>>
>> Glad you've made prog
hink about it might be a bit off base. :)
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:31 PM Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The concept of run duration there is one of the ways we allow users to
>> hint to the framework what their preference is. In general all users
>&
The concept of run duration there is one of the ways we allow users to
hint to the framework what their preference is. In general all users
want the thing to 'go fast'. But what 'fast' means for you is
throughput and what fast means for someone else is low latency.
What this really means under
Mike
Just to follow up it looks like the issue you hit and another related one
was just addressed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3678
Thanks
Joe
On Apr 4, 2017 8:30 PM, "Joe Witt" <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It agree it should. For content it does.
>
&g
If you're seeing 'transfer relationship not specified' it means one or
more of the flowfiles you've pulled have not been acted upon for
transfer meaning you have a logic/code flow path whereby a flowfile
can be pulled from the queue but never transferred.
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:57 PM,
Olav,
How large is your content repository?
How large is a large file?
How many transformation steps exist in your flow from receipt through
delivery of that large file?
Thanks
Joe
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Olav Jordens <
olav.jord...@2degreesmobile.co.nz> wrote:
> Apologies – forgot
Olav
Your understanding sounds spot on to me and your settings seem quite fine
for what you're trying to do. What version of NiFi are you working with?
Thanks
Joe
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Olav Jordens <
olav.jord...@2degreesmobile.co.nz> wrote:
> Hi Users,
>
>
>
> I have had this
Brett
I think originally it was because the sftp client we used didn't support
jks. One could probably bridge that to something it can support but not
sure. Please feel free to file a jira. Using a CS for such things could
be useful too.
Thanks
On Jul 28, 2017 7:53 AM, "Brett Tiplitz"
Brian,
There have been issues in the past with regard to template importing
and it causing duplicate controller service entries. But these should
be much improved. What version are you using?
Also, the registry component that is now being worked on should help
this quite a bit. The
Hello
Please do a stack dump by running 'bin/nifi.sh dump' then share the
contents of the nifi-bootstrap.log file.
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Jin Park wrote:
> I have GetAzureEventHub I am working to setup. For testing purposes, I
> have ran the job then
Jim,
Ultimately this comes down to whether any consuming process (not just
NiFi) can reliably know that a given file is 'ready to be consumed'.
If the writer of those files offers no 'protocol' by which you can
know then unfortunately it is about 'having a pretty good guess' that
they're done.
Mike,
The record reader/writers do support hierarchical data models and the
RecordPath expressions allow you to refer to nested elements similar
to XPath for XML.
There is a PutElasticsearchHttpRecord [1]
[1]
James,
I know Jeff Storck has recently been doing some work around
Kerberos/TGT renewal. Hopefully he can share some of his
observations/work back on this thread soon.
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:48 AM, James Srinivasan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a NiFi
something is still running when in the
problematic condition? Also, is this thread dump definitely from when
there was a hung thread/hung process?
Thanks
Joe
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Jin Park <jinp...@payoff.com> wrote:
> Here is the dump for wifi…
>
>
>
> On Jul 13,
Manojkumar
The support is for viewing the top 100 items. It isn't meant to
provide exhaustive access or pagination but rather to see the top
elements so that one could look at the items, understand how they're
ordered, look at their attributes, click to content, etc.. It offers
a live look into
Yep. Very common. Set the desired size or number of object targets
and set the 'Max Bin Age' so that it will kick out whatever you've got
by that time.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:38 AM, James McMahon wrote:
> Good morning. I have a situation where I have a staging
Good point Pierre. Could also be the api to list directories that
have so many files in them. I recommend trying on a directory with
less things to list and see if that helps too as that means we need to
evaluate other things.
Also, we clearly could make it easier for users to see what is going
Has the version of java being used changed by chance on the system?
And if so, or perhaps even if not, were the JCE extensions
installed/configured previously and now it is not? Other than that
the only other thing that comes to mind is if the sensitive properties
key was changed
On Wed, Jul 26,
Dan - are you able to share the nifi-app and nifi-bootstrap logs?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Dan Morris wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’m having an issue getting NiFi to start correctly. Here’s my situation:
>
> I’m currently running v0.7.0.
> I have a production
p.
>
> Thanks all for your input and quick responses to assist me on this matter.
>
>
> On 26 July 2017 at 16:27, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Good point Pierre. Could also be the api to list directories that
>> have so many files in them. I recommend
5B 2F7D EF69
>
> On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Dan Morris <dgmorri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> I’ve attached relevant files… tried to redact sensitive info… hope I didn’t
> cut too much from the logs…
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
>
>
> On 7/26/17, 9:30
Paul Nahay on the wiki asked the following. I've directed him here so
we can discuss as appropriate on the mailing lists.
What is the current state, and future plans, for NiFi transferring
large data sets?
How large can data attached to FlowFiles be, currently?
Whatever the answer to #2 above
...but in the meantime it can process others...
On Jun 29, 2017 8:40 AM, "Pierre Villard"
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> That's correct. When going in the failure relationship, the flow files are
> penalized with a duration of 30s (by default, this can be changed in the
>
To understand jython/python relationship [1]
To understand example usage of the processor a bit more [2, 3, 4].
[1] http://www.jython.org/archive/21/docs/whatis.html
[2]
https://community.hortonworks.com/articles/75032/executescript-cookbook-part-1.html
[3]
no worries tim. this is a good place to ask and I guarantee this
thread will help someone else later.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Tim Zimmerman wrote:
> Bryan,
>
> Thanks for the quick response. Yes I thought it quite strange myself. I
> was trying to debug a
while the larger files are processed.
>
> The surprising thing for me is that even with nifi.content.claim.max.flow.
> files=1
>
> I still see multiple pieces of content within a single file in the content
> repository. Some are small bits os sql / json, and others are huge 1GB text
>
ther than a rule, does it make sense to
> reduce the max.append.size from 10MB down to say 1 KB?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olav
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Joe Witt [mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 25 April 2017 2:16 p.m.
>
> *To:* users@nifi.apache.org
&
There are some great points here. Am on a phone right now so will be very
brief. The current 1.4.0 snapshot on master has some nice improvements for
ease of use with record handling. This includes writers inheriting schema
from the reader and others.
Thanks
On Aug 1, 2017 1:20 AM, "Peter
Lauren,
The PublishKafka processor series is where we really dug into the
details of the Kafka API and build the processors in a manner far more
aligned to the Kafka style. They work well. The PublishKafkaRecord
processor though is *really* nice in terms of performance and it means
it is part
Frank
There are three repositories.
- FlowFile (tracks metadata about things actively in the flow)
- Content (holds the actual underlying content for things in the flow or
still in archive)
- Provenance (holds metadata about the events that went through the flow)
Provenance and content
The concept of being able to provide hints to the underlying content
repository about which content is more important to keep longer than
others is a good one. I'd recommend filing a JIRA for the ask and
providing your proposed concept as one to consider.
Definitely see something like this being
Hello
Can you please clarify the processor(s) you're using. It is the
ListSftp and FetchSftp processors? Or is it GetSFTP?
For the processor to send the data to the success relationship it
should mean that the transfer session reports a successful conclusion.
Can you show us the logs for the
Kris,
Now that five months have passed on this thread I suppose it is time
to reply :-) Sorry about the delay
To the basis of the question we do not provide in Apache NiFi today
any built-in or integrated quota management for the various tenants of
a given system. The multi-tenancy today is
Hello
They will remain unversioned until they are built with the latest nar
plugin. This is described briefly in the migration guidance [1].
For anything built with the older nifi nar plugin the resulting nar
will not have suffiicient bundle data for the framework to have it
support component
Ben
If you can get a hold of a jdbc/odbc driver then you might be able to
use existing processors and just point at the jdbc jar. Otherwise,
you might need to write one. Please let us know which path you go.
Thanks
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:01 PM, 尹文才 wrote:
> Hi guys,
e
> new version will likely help us out a lot. We do not plan on getting this
> far behind again.
>
> [image: Payoff, Inc.]
> *Jeremy Farbota*
> Software Engineer, Data
> Payoff, Inc.
>
> jfarb...@payoff.com
> (217) 898-8110 <+2178988110>
>
> On Fri, Jun
Jeremy
It is possible that backpressure was being engaged in NiFi and causing our
consumer code to handle it poorly. We did fix that a while ago and I think
it ended up in NiFi 1.2.0 (off top of mind anyway). Between your current
release and the latest 1.3.0 release a few bugs with those
That is correct.
On May 19, 2017 9:47 AM, "ddewaele" wrote:
> We're using docker, and in our failover scenario the machine is rebooted
> and/or the docker system is restarted.
>
> We're currently volume mapping the following :
>
> -
Thanks,
> Neil
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Neil,
>>
>> Want to make sure I understand what you're saying. What are stating
>> is a single point of failure?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>
When a node joins a cluster it writes its node identifier into its local
state. This is in a state directory. Is that directory being removed? If
so it will get a new identifier. Otherwise when the node is started it
will reuse that identifier.
On May 19, 2017 4:13 AM, "ddewaele"
down on that node(or the node
> itself goes down), does it support HA?
>
>
> 2017-05-25 20:46 GMT+08:00 Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> You put the DistributedMapCacheServer controller service on as well
>> and then point at it from t
_STOPPED
>>> [date] [time],### INFO [main] org.apache.nifi.bootstrap.RunNiFi
>>> Registered no Notification Services for Notification Type NIFI_DIED
>>> [date] [time],### INFO [main] org.apache.nifi.bootstrap.Command Apache
>>> NiFi is not running
>>>
>
vement with 1.2.0 sounds like it will make a big difference. Sadly
> as you recall it may be some time before 1.2.x is available to me.
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> jim
>>
>> that provenance warning is not
Jim,
The code relevant to that log output is here [1]. Can you share the
bootstrap output before/after that output?
[1]
https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/rel/nifi-0.7.1/nifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/bootstrap/RunNiFi.java
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:11 AM, James
Hello
You put the DistributedMapCacheServer controller service on as well
and then point at it from the client services. So in your three nodes
all three will have the server service but on all the clients they'll
only point to the server service on one of the nodes.
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, May 25,
a situation, and whether there is a more refined way to solve
> it than full system reboot. There are other things running on the resource
> and I should try to minimize impact to them by fully rebooting.
>
> Let me see about that log content. Thank you again.
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:
odified and/or gracefully shutdown (afaik) is
> what I was referring to.
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe at the state you describe that down node is now considered
>> disconnected. The cluster behavior pr
t can't be reported on either, i.e. some GETs fail, like
> nifi-api/flow/process-groups/root.
>
> Are we describing the same behavior?
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If there is no longer a quorum then we cannot drive thing
Neil,
Want to make sure I understand what you're saying. What are stating
is a single point of failure?
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Neil Derraugh
wrote:
> Thanks for the insight Matt.
>
> It's a disaster recovery issue. It's not something
prabhu - can you please share screenshots and or logs showing that it
is running only once?
Thanks
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:42 AM, prabhu Mahendran
wrote:
> Aldrin,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> For GetHTTP ,I have checked to download different files even it could
I'm not an expert in this arena but there a couple of JIRAs that may
be relevant which are targeted for the NiFi 1.3.0 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3112
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2199
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Jeremy Taylor
Mika
And yes to question one. What you're doing us fine. There will also soon
be an option for the writer to just infer its schema from the reader which
may be useful in simplifying the config more.
Glad you are finding these useful. If you'd like to contribute a sample
flow that does this we
Is there anything interesting in the nifi-bootstrap.log?
On May 5, 2017 6:52 AM, "Janaki Joshi" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been using NiFi for a while now. Since last evening I've started
> facing an issue that I am unable to get to the root of. My NiFi (Deployed
> on an
It is worth discussing whether there is sufficient value to warrant
keeping jython/python support in the processors or whether we should
pull it. It is certainly something we can document as being highly
limited but we don't really know how limited. Frankly given the
performance I've seen with
Go here:
https://nifi.apache.org/docs/nifi-docs/html/user-guide.html#Summary_Page
It shows you how to get the summary view. Click on connections.
Sort on the column of interest.
Thanks
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Russell Bateman wrote:
> Is there some NiFi
Kunal,
Solution to what though? Are you trying to minimize CPU usage in
general or are you not hitting the latencies you need?
You can lengthen the bored yield duration in nifi.properties and still
get solid performance.
Joe
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:15 AM, kunal
the version in that processor selection dialog?
>
> 2017-05-18 10:42 GMT+08:00 Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> They will remain unversioned until they are built with the latest nar
>> plugin. This is described briefly in the migration guidance [1].
&
PutFile while writing automatically writes with a dot prepended and
once the write is complete it removes the dot.
If you have multiple instances of PutFile writing to the same file
with the intent of appending to that file it will like fail in strange
ways.
I would recommend you simply build up
Hello
It is certainly possible to have a process act as a listening daemon
and you can see this in various Listen processors. Basically once
they are scheduled they open up some port under some protocol and
listen for incoming data. The custom processor you're mentioning can
spawn a thread to
Venkat
I think you'll want to take a closer look at the apache nifi 1.2.0
release support for record readers and record writers. It handles
schema aware parsing/transformation and more for things like csv,
json, avro, can be easily extended, and supports scripted readers and
writers written
Raman,
There are no out of the box apache nifi processors to encrypt specific
fields of a given record. With the record reader/writer capabilities
that came out in 1.3.0 we can probably much more easily provide one
but in the mean time it is a pretty straight forward extension to
build. You
Mika,
Could it be ok for your case to use MergeContent to package data
together in some archive format like Zip/Tar? If yes then you can
just add a tar/zip to your email.
Otherwise, the changes necessary to PutEmail for supporting multiple
attachments would be quite involved.
Thanks
On Wed,
nelSender.java#L45-L78
>
> Should be doing something like this where it catches, closes, and rethrows:
>
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-commons/nifi-security-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/remote/io/socket/ssl/SSLSocketChannel.java#L140-L179
>
>
> On Mo
his processor and all of them end up getting closed correctly.
>
> So the "hanging" connection originated from the built-in PutTCP processor.
>
>
> Joe Witt wrote
>> If you stop the processor manually does it clean them up?
>>
>> When the connections
Davy
If you could give the PR a try and see if it helps I'd be happy to
help get it reviewed and in for 1.4 if timing works out.
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Bryan Bende wrote:
> Davy,
>
> I just pushed a second commit to the PR that will log the port from
> the
causing my primary node to shift, or why the processors are unable to
> recover when the node shifts. If I find any more info I'll raise a ticket.
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Gino. If you can confirm/replicate
301 - 400 of 927 matches
Mail list logo