Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-08-13 Thread Rino Beeli
There seems to be an error with the TomEE.amd64.exe running on an amd64 Windows Server 2008 R2 server.

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-12 Thread zeeman
This a great idea Anthony, I think it should be right on Tomee docs. Can you update this thread when you have it done? Thanks. Eclipse is still behaving with Tomee, whenever I make changes (XHTML or Java) Tomee is restarted, even when I have auto reloading disabled. I have installed M2e WTP, jars

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-12 Thread Anthony Fryer
I'll do a blog about setting up using eclipse, maven and tomee. Do you have a tomee blog site that i can use? -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Feedback-on-TomEE-1-0-0-tp4655483p4655571.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-09 Thread David Blevins
On Jun 9, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Anthony Fryer wrote: > Since 1.0.0 though i don't believe thats the case anymore and that you can > select the "use workspace metadata" option and it should just work. Would > be good to get David to confirm that is the case. Confirmed. The Eclipse/TomEE doc needs

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-09 Thread Anthony Fryer
You don't need that lifecycle plugin i showed unless m2e tells you that you need it. So I'm glad to hear you seem to be up and running now. The "use workspace metadata (does not modify tomcat installation)" is the option i use with my tomee server in eclipse. I have also seen the documentation t

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread zeeman
Thank you Anthony, your help has made my life easier. Currently I'm letting Eclipse control Tomee, http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655536/tomeeEcl.png Which options do you use so workspace is used? The first option? I got confused because on Tomee docs it says to use what I'm current

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread Anthony Fryer
I should mention that m2e will usually add those org.eclipse.m2e:lifecycle-mapping configurations into your pom.xml for you if it detects it can't execute a plugin during the eclipse build. You get an error marker and the quick fix will add the configuration element to your pom.xml. -- View this

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread Anthony Fryer
With m2e-wtp you don't need to adjust any of the deployment assembly settings. Also with m2e you don't need the eclipse maven plugin. Just create a standard maven project and then import it into eclipse. m2e will configure most of eclipse automatically. For those plugins that eclipse can't exec

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread zeeman
Anthony, I have installed m2e-wtp, could you please post a screenshot of your Tomcat overview settings? Which mappings do you have in Deployment Assembly (right click on project you'll see DA) ? -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Feedback-on-TomEE-1-0-0-tp46554

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread Anthony Fryer
I have been using tomee with eclipse for about 19 months now and i can verify that the 1.0.0 release makes it much alot easier than it was. Before that, you had alot more work to do if you wanted to use workspace metadata as the server location. Now it works out of the box. I also think m2e has

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread zeeman
Sure, I'll try the latest but few questions: With below steps the project won't be copied, and xhtml pages will be reloaded automatically, for java changes I need to restart Tomee. Is this correct? 1- Make a new folder in my source tree src/main/tomee/conf put server.xml from Tomee installation

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
target/ROOT or something like that should help but the folder will be copied. server.xml should be in src/main/tomee/conf by default. just added a parameter (on trunk) skipCurrentProject to be able to avoid the copy of current artifact even when the packaging type is not pom. so what you should

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-08 Thread zeeman
Did you try providing an exploded war to warFile parameter of mvn plugin? I did not use warFile param, I was using ROOT as final name. So I would use warFile and the name of my project? ROOT in this case since it's folder's name? I do have a Maven POM project. Where should I locate the server.xm

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Did you try providing an exploded war to warFile parameter of mvn plugin? Using ROOT as final name can help too. And to avoid copy create a pom project and provide a custom server.xml with your context, it should do the trick. About eclipse you got mvn issues i guess more than wtp ones, maybe m2

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread zeeman
Hi David, I simply followed different guides, ones from Tomee docs and stackoverflow. These guides tend to leave out some details and that's where I got stuck. For example, by default Eclipse Tomcat adapter works with a WebContent folder, but Maven expects web pages to be at src/main/webapp. It's

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread David Blevins
On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:16 PM, zeeman wrote: > I was talking about Eclipse IDE, it took me over 4 hours to really figure > out how to run Tomee with needed project libs from Eclipse. That's surprising. Things we really bad before the 1.0.0 and after some of the changes we made it seems to be work

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread David Blevins
On Jun 7, 2012, at 6:16 PM, zeeman wrote: > Hi, > > I have used Jboss AS7 and Glassfish3.1 for JavaEE. Just heard about Tomee > and migrated a real world project from AS7 to see how it goes. Here is some > "real feedback" > > Good: > 1- Validation on Tomee is great, it catches things other cont

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread zeeman
Thanks for your help Romain. I was talking about Eclipse IDE, it took me over 4 hours to really figure out how to run Tomee with needed project libs from Eclipse. The project works fine in both AS7 and Glassfish. Things did not work as expected only in Tomee, that's because Tomee uses Myfaces. As

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
thanks for the feedback, regarding bad point it seems Intellij IDEA will integrate TomEE in next version :), hope other ides can do the same, about our examples that's the goal but we need some more complete samples like moviefun can be. Finally the issue related to myfaces can be related to the l

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread zeeman
Hi, I have used Jboss AS7 and Glassfish3.1 for JavaEE. Just heard about Tomee and migrated a real world project from AS7 to see how it goes. Here is some "real feedback" Good: 1- Validation on Tomee is great, it catches things other containers don't. Injection points, etc... 2- It's based on some

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-07 Thread iTooty_ iTooty_
We'd like to hear about anything you'd like to tell us. If you're short on ideas, here are some: - Ways we can speed up or improve your ability to evaluate TomEE - Anything you found difficult or inconvenient about using TomEE - Documentation you would like to see - Features you would like t

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
About hibernate o really dont have the choice :p Well at first i wanted to use jersey too then discovered cxf was really cool I just wanted to say try it Le 1 juin 2012 18:03, "David Blevins" a écrit : > On Jun 1, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > > However, i still wonder what's

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-01 Thread David Blevins
On Jun 1, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > However, i still wonder what's the issue with openjpa and cxf? Typically if > you need another server use another server That reads a lot more aggressively than you intended :) I say that knowing you use Hibernate in TomEE instead of O

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-06-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/openejb/examples/tomee-jersey-eclipselink/ i made it working on trunk the issue were: 1) eclipselink: the jta tx controller was needed and the one we provide is in common.lib so you can't use it if eclipselink is in the webapp. Workaround -> http://sv

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-31 Thread David Blevins
On May 31, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Jim May wrote: > Hello, > > I appreciate the effort the community is putting into TomEE. Unfortunately, > it is a nightmare to use when developing applications. The biggest problem > is trying to get the dependencies to work together. I use Netbeans IDE and > I am tr

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-31 Thread José Luis Cetina
tawerx Java Hosting > > > > - Original Message - From: "Jim May" > To: > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 12:37 AM > Subject: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0 > > > > Hello, >> >> I appreciate the effort the community is putting into TomEE. >&g

RE: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-31 Thread David Villacampa Rodriguez
May [mailto:jim.webg...@gmail.com] Enviado el: jueves, 31 de mayo de 2012 16:37 Para: users@openejb.apache.org Asunto: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0 Hello, I appreciate the effort the community is putting into TomEE. Unfortunately, it is a nightmare to use when developing applications. The biggest

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-31 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, not sure about eclipselink but typically hibernate can be put in a webapp and it works well (logically it should be the same for eclipselink) about jersey why don't you try cxf? Well if you can share anything i could have a look. - Romain 2012/5/31 Jim May > Hello, > > I appreciate the

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-31 Thread Neale Rudd
Best Regards, Neale Rudd Metawerx Java Hosting - Original Message - From: "Jim May" To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 12:37 AM Subject: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0 Hello, I appreciate the effort the community is putting into TomEE. Unfortunately, it is a nightmare to us

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-31 Thread Jim May
Hello, I appreciate the effort the community is putting into TomEE. Unfortunately, it is a nightmare to use when developing applications. The biggest problem is trying to get the dependencies to work together. I use Netbeans IDE and I am trying to setup a restful webservice with Jersey and Eclipse

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, thanks for the feedback :) when you speak about Distirbuted Caching what do you think of? tomcat 7 distributed session of distributed L2 caches currently work. - Romain 2012/5/14 srikanth > Its simply the superb.. i love it and will encourage it. > > I would like to mention need

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-14 Thread srikanth
Its simply the superb.. i love it and will encourage it. I would like to mention need of features like... A Distirbuted Caching. A Bussiness Process Management. I hate JBoss AS 7 and Redhat as a whole I'm a great lover and fan of Apache Products... regards srikanth

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-05-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, Nice to have been helpful! - Romain Le 2 mai 2012 04:15, "Abani" a écrit : > Hi Romain, > > I have verified with System.out.println() instead of logger. its works > fine. > I followed the instruction mentioned by you. > > Regards > Abani > >

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-05-01 Thread Abani
Hi Romain, I have verified with System.out.println() instead of logger. its works fine. I followed the instruction mentioned by you. Regards Abani

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Not a bad idea, as a side note you can checkout the site here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/site/trunk/content/ Another good thing could be a one page cheat sheet. - Romain Le 1 mai 2012 13:28, "Chetan Sharma" a écrit : > Hello, > > It will be helpful if you guys could provide a docu

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0

2012-05-01 Thread Chetan Sharma
Hello, It will be helpful if you guys could provide a document help in a pdf file such that developers can easily read the documentation content. Since I am new to this so it will take bit time to provide more remarks. Good work otherwise Guys... Keep it up... :) Cheers Chetan We'd like

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-05-01 Thread abani.openejb
Hi Romain, You are correct. I have checked with Sys.out & its works perfectly. Thank You so much for your valuable inouts. Regards, Abani -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Feedback-on-TomEE-1-0-0-beta-2-tp4560812p463.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailin

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-04-25 Thread José Luis Cetina
We'd like to hear about anything you'd like to tell us. If you're short on ideas, here are some: - Ways we can speed up or improve your ability to evaluate TomEE - Anything you found difficult or inconvenient about using TomEE - Documentation you would like to see - Features you would like to hav

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-04-16 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
t's now known) hasn't started yet. > > Safe to ignore. > > Best Regards, > Neale > > > - Original Message - From: "Eran Medan" > To: > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:16 PM > Subject: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2 > > > >

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-04-16 Thread Neale Rudd
From: "Eran Medan" To: Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:16 PM Subject: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2 Hi All tests seem to work well, but I get this error no matter what I do (I'm starting using bin/startup.bat) ERROR: OpenEJB webapp was not found (The first line in the console l

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-04-16 Thread Eran Medan
Hi All tests seem to work well, but I get this error no matter what I do (I'm starting using bin/startup.bat) ERROR: OpenEJB webapp was not found (The first line in the console logs) I assume I can ignore, but thought it's worth mentioning if not already known... Thanks

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-03-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
David, just one note, i did some changes to disallow a complete webapp to be treated by OpenEJB. Dunno if that is still up in the TomcatWebAppBuilder, but in the mid time that could be helpful. It can be a servlet context attribute or init property. org.apache.openejb.tomcat.catalina.TomcatWebA

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-03-15 Thread David Blevins
Thank you so much for the feedback, Lilly! It would be absolutely fantastic if you could post any errors from the logs or describe what didn't work with the deployment of both #1 and #2 apps. For #1, the Java EE TCK is good but you know how portability goes :) Tens of thousands of tests and st

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-03-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hum strange, the download links seem great now. Didn't do anything but ... Jean-Louis 2012/3/15 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > Hi Adrien, > > First of, thanks a lot for the feedback. That is an important point to > make OpenEJB/TomEE progress in a good way. > > Just one note regarding the drop-in-war ap

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-03-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi Adrien, First of, thanks a lot for the feedback. That is an important point to make OpenEJB/TomEE progress in a good way. Just one note regarding the drop-in-war approach versus the TomEE full package: the drop-in-war should work in most cases, but we had to tweek tomcat and our integration to

Re: Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-03-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hello, Both should definitely work. If not, let us know so we can fix. The best is a simple test case (webapp) we can drop in TomEE. Anyway, thanks for the feedback Jean-Louis 2012/3/15 Lilly Wang > Hello, > > I have been a Tomcat user for over 10 years. I like Tomcat, because it is > si

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-03-15 Thread Lilly Wang
Hello, I have been a Tomcat user for over 10 years. I like Tomcat, because it is simple and easy to use, and it always making my web app working. I like the idea of OpenEJB+Tomcat => Apache TomEE! I expect: 1) my EE app will work with TomEE as easy as with Tomcat, but it seems not. 2)

Feedback on TomEE 1.0.0-beta-2

2012-03-09 Thread Adrien Regimbald
Hi, I've been trying out the OpenEJB / TomEE Plus drop in WAR to deploy some web apps which use EJBs and have previously been running on GlassFish v3. Initial testing looks positive and things are running as expected. Thanks for making this available! Just a heads up that some of your 4.0.0-be