Web Kracked wrote:
2) Why does 3.2 [windows] need MS Visual C++ when 3.1.1 did not?
They probably used the C++ standard lib to do something?. I mean, OOo
has ben using the MS Visual C redistributable since day 1, why is using
C++ a big change?.
I wonder what is being used for Win Visual
Le 12.02.2010 08:36, M Henri Day a écrit :
2010/2/11 Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@laposte.net
Le 11.02.2010 23:17, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Henri,
M Henri Day wrote (11-02-10 18:48)
Are there any ? (I shan't be downloading the latest version for a while
anyway, as a
I must agree with the top posting proposition. It would seem very
counter intuitive to scroll to the bottom of a message, read the message
moving down the script and then scroll up to read the previous message,
constantly repeating the process, up down, up down sometimes almost ad
infinitum
- Original Message -
From: Keith R Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 2:41:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [users] Top posting should be allowed
Good afternoon all, particularly the moderators
I have been criticised a few
I got the following error, following a reboot and update, using Open Office
3.0.1
llh...@marcus:~$ soffice -writer 2009-09-14recustomhealthcarewheelchair5.doc
** (soffice:4237): WARNING **: unable to get gail version number
llh...@marcus:~$ error - missing word count in dictionary file
Hash
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 18:41 +1100, Keith R Bainbridge wrote:
Good afternoon all, particularly the moderators
I have been criticised a few times for top posting on this list. I haven't
participated much since the last critic.
snip
I suspect this will start a flame or two, but I am passionate
2010/2/11 Clare du Bois lightofthewo...@taosnet.com:
I sure hope you can help me, I have a manuscript to correct and it would
take hours to do it manually. I am using OO3 on a MacBookPro dual
processor, intel machine. I have already tried to access some kind of find
and replace function and
Top-posting has only ever made sense (and barely, at that) in a
two-person exchange of a short sequence; where all fits on one page, as:
I agree with that message, but I would like to summarize it in a
two-lines rule :
* When you do a short answer to a question, you have to top-post
Brewster Gillett b...@fdi.us wrote in message
news:1265970470.4273.298.ca...@merlin.fdi.loc...
This whole top-posting thing, IMHO, originated with clueless NetNoobs
several years ago, who when first encountering an email editing format,
took exactly the wrong interpretation of the usual cursor
On 2010-02-11 5:37 PM, Web Kracked wrote:
When I started this thread, I seemed to open up a can of worms.
I just wanted to know a few things.
1) What is different about OOo3.2 that requires Admin privileges
when 3.1.1 did not?
2) Why does 3.2 [windows] need MS Visual C++ when 3.1.1 did
On 2010-02-12 2:41 AM, Keith R Bainbridge wrote:
If I am following a long thread the last thing I want to do is page
down over the information I have read before.
This is why *selective* quoting should always be employed, whether you
are top-posting or bottom/inline posting.
My biggest gripe
On 2010-02-12 5:12 AM, Linda L. Hull wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Keith R Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com
I suspect this will start a flame or two, but I am passionate about
this.
I agree. I don't like bottom posting, for the reasons mentioned
above, but you had to read all
Linda L. Hull wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Keith R Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com
Good afternoon all, particularly the moderators
Keith Bainbridge
I agree. I don't like bottom posting, for the reasons mentioned above, but you had to read all that again, to see my
Javier Rivera wrote:
Web Kracked wrote:
2) Why does 3.2 [windows] need MS Visual C++ when 3.1.1 did not?
They probably used the C++ standard lib to do something?. I mean, OOo
has ben using the MS Visual C redistributable since day 1, why is
using C++ a big change?.
I wonder what is being
-Original Message-
From: Web Kracked [mailto:webmas...@krackedpress.com]
When I started this thread, I seemed to open up a can of worms.
I just wanted to know a few things.
1) What is different about OOo3.2 that requires Admin privileges when
3.1.1 did not?
2) Why does
On 2010-02-12 9:51 AM, Web Kracked wrote:
Well, as some people have already questioned on why OOo is using MS's
stuff.
They only use it (2005 runtime) on windows systems.
Something obviously did change if it now *requires* it, because I know
it didn't use to, although I wouldn't have run into
Web Kracked wrote:
Then if they have been using MS's C++ all the long, why is it this is
the first time
that I get the message that their system is being installed on my computer?
They had been using MSV C runtime library, they have added MSV C++
library now.
If you don't believe me, just
Keith wrote:
why some dislike top posting. If I am following a long thread the
last thing I want to do is page down over the information I have
read before.
One of the reasons for bottom posting (on a support mailing list like
this, at least) is that half the reason it exists is for people
On Feb 12, 2010, at 17:03 , M. Fioretti wrote:
Keith wrote:
why some dislike top posting. If I am following a long thread the
last thing I want to do is page down over the information I have
read before.
One of the reasons for bottom posting (on a support mailing list like
this, at
- Original Message -
Good afternoon all, particularly the moderators
snip balance of original message)
Linda L. Hull wrote:
I agree. I don't like bottom posting, for the reasons mentioned above, but
you had to read all
that again, to see my thoughts.
chalcedony
Linda
bg:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
Actually, just NEVER EVER use the macro recorder at all,
The functionality of the macro recorder depends upon why you think it is
there.
If you thought it would help you create macros for use on two, or more
documents, you'd be wrong.
If, OTOH, you thought it would be a
*Grâce à* Jean-Baptiste, I've now installed OOo 3.2 on my 64-bit Ubuntu
Karmic setup and uninstalled OOo 3.1 via the Synaptic package manager.
However, when I click a document in my Document folder, it still opens by
default in 3.1.0 ! I've looked in the help files - perhaps too cursorily -
but
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:51:56AM -, Gordon wrote:
Brewster Gillett b...@fdi.us wrote in message
news:1265970470.4273.298.ca...@merlin.fdi.loc...
This whole top-posting thing, IMHO, originated with clueless NetNoobs
several years ago, who when first encountering an email editing
I just exported a letter to PDF and find that with oo3.2.0, OOO320m12
(Build:9483) using XP Media Center with service pack 3 the background
does not appear in the PDF file. I can't find an option to turn it on
or off as is possible when sending a document to a printer. Is this a
new bug? I
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:24:18PM +0100, James Wilde wrote:
..snip...
Good point, Marco, and the first really rational - as opposed to religious -
justification for bottom-posting. My own position is when in Rome do as the
Romans. If I find that the general
Gene Kohlenberg wrote:
I just exported a letter to PDF and find that with oo3.2.0, OOO320m12
(Build:9483) using XP Media Center with service pack 3 the background
does not appear in the PDF file. I can't find an option to turn it on
or off as is possible when sending a document to a printer.
In news:27e233ac-a3ab-41ef-9050-7a8e8da2f...@gmail.com,
Keith R Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com typed:
Good afternoon all, particularly the moderators
I have been criticised a few times for top posting on this list. I
haven't participated much since the last critic.
...
Your personal issues
In news:19086511.191265969536017.javamail.r...@pim.riffle.be,
Linda L. Hull chalced...@riffle.be typed:
- Original Message -
From: Keith R Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 2:41:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
Subject: [users] Top
In news:20100212160328.gb6...@nexaima.net,
M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net typed:
Keith wrote:
why some dislike top posting. If I am following a long thread the
last thing I want to do is page down over the information I have
read before.
One of the reasons for bottom posting (on a
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. DID YOU SEND TO WRONG ADDRESS?
--
From: Twayne twa...@twaynesdomain.com
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 11:20 AM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: [users] OT Re: Top posting should be allowed BORING!
In
I have no idea what this is about. Did you send to wrong address?
--
From: Twayne twa...@twaynesdomain.com
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 11:21 AM
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: [users] Re: Top posting should be allowed
In
M Henri Day wrote:
*Grâce à* Jean-Baptiste, I've now installed OOo 3.2 on my 64-bit Ubuntu
Karmic setup and uninstalled OOo 3.1 via the Synaptic package manager.
However, when I click a document in my Document folder, it still opens by
default in 3.1.0 ! I've looked in the help files - perhaps
jonathon wrote:
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
Actually, just NEVER EVER use the macro recorder at all,
The functionality of the macro recorder depends upon why you think it is
there.
If you thought it would help you create macros for use on two, or more
documents, you'd be wrong.
If, OTOH, you
2010/2/10 Roger T. Reynolds rreyn...@hotmail.com:
Please Help!
How do I uninstall the OPENOFFICE 3.1.0 suite?
As others said, you didn't mention your operating system, so I assume
that it is Ubuntu and that you installed OpenOffice.org 3.1.0 from the
repositories. In that case, this should
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote (11-02-10 23:59)
In fact OOO320m11 was RC4, RC5 and OOo 3.2.0 Final is OOO320m12.
Yes, my bad ;-\
I'd better gone to bed in time :-)
Apologies Henri.
Cor
--
Your office 2010 software: the new OpenOffice.org
Cor Nouws
- ideas/remarks for the
2010/2/12 Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote (11-02-10 23:59)
In fact OOO320m11 was RC4, RC5 and OOo 3.2.0 Final is OOO320m12.
Yes, my bad ;-\
I'd better gone to bed in time :-)
Apologies Henri.
Cor
No problem, Cor ; I've managed to install the
2010/2/11 Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com:
I need to use the Unicode Gear symbol as a bullet point in lists:
⚙
I click on Numbering/Bullets however in none of the screens can I
change to use this symbol. The only screen that comes close is the
Options where I could set the numbering to use
Your character seems to be U+2699 and that character seems (and many
more) seems to be missing. On the other hand, I tested some fonts and
I noticed that some characters were available for some fonts and not
for other fonts, so maybe if you don't know which font contains the
character, if you
2010/2/12 Tom Bell cbel...@cfl.rr.com
M Henri Day wrote:
*Grâce à* Jean-Baptiste, I've now installed OOo 3.2 on my 64-bit Ubuntu
Karmic setup and uninstalled OOo 3.1 via the Synaptic package manager.
However, when I click a document in my Document folder, it still opens by
default in
On 2010/02/12 1:22 PM Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2010/2/10 Roger T. Reynoldsrreyn...@hotmail.com:
How do I uninstall the OPENOFFICE 3.1.0 suite?
As others said, you didn't mention your operating system, so I assume
that it is Ubunta
If you checked the headers you could deduce that he
2010/2/12 Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com:
Your character seems to be U+2699 and that character seems (and many
more) seems to be missing. On the other hand, I tested some fonts and
I noticed that some characters were available for some fonts and not
for other fonts, so maybe if you don't
2010/2/12 Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com:
On 2010/02/12 1:22 PM Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2010/2/10 Roger T. Reynoldsrreyn...@hotmail.com:
How do I uninstall the OPENOFFICE 3.1.0 suite?
As others said, you didn't mention your operating system, so I assume
that it is Ubunta
I type
U+2699 exists in:
Apple Symbols
DejaVu
Menlo
Al Maloney
Your character seems to be U+2699
No, none of the fonts listed show that character. Obviously it exists
in some font, but how can I know which?
-
Al Maloney
Using OOo_Dev_DEV300 on Mac OS X 10.5.5
Velox Versutus
On 2/12/2010 2:41 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Your character seems to be U+2699 and that character seems (and many
more) seems to be missing. On the other hand, I tested some fonts and
I noticed that some characters were available for some fonts and not
for other fonts, so maybe if you don't know
On 13/02/10 06:57, M Henri Day wrote:
2010/2/12 Tom Bellcbel...@cfl.rr.com
M Henri Day wrote:
*Grâce à* Jean-Baptiste, I've now installed OOo 3.2 on my 64-bit Ubuntu
Karmic setup and uninstalled OOo 3.1 via the Synaptic package manager.
However, when I click a document in my Document folder,
Russell Butler wrote:
I presume you downloaded the .debs from the OOo repositories? I just
installed 320m12-RC5, which became 3.2, and running sudo dpkg -i *.deb
in the desktop integration directory, 3.2 is now my default, even
though I still have 3.1.1 installed.
I just wonder if you
On 13/02/10 11:02, Web Kracked wrote:
Russell Butler wrote:
I presume you downloaded the .debs from the OOo repositories? I just
installed 320m12-RC5, which became 3.2, and running sudo dpkg -i *.deb
in the desktop integration directory, 3.2 is now my default, even
though I still have 3.1.1
Russell Butler wrote:
On 13/02/10 11:02, Web Kracked wrote:
Russell Butler wrote:
I presume you downloaded the .debs from the OOo repositories? I just
installed 320m12-RC5, which became 3.2, and running sudo dpkg -i *.deb
in the desktop integration directory, 3.2 is now my default, even
On 02/12/2010 08:51 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
*Grâce à* Jean-Baptiste, I've now installed OOo 3.2 on my 64-bit Ubuntu
Karmic setup and uninstalled OOo 3.1 via the Synaptic package manager.
However, when I click a document in my Document folder, it still opens by
default in 3.1.0 ! I've looked in
Well, Brewster, you've chewed it over at some length on several
occasions. Get used to the idea that given the same facts, different
people will reach different conclusions, equally valid. Some people,
more experienced than you in email lists and internet forums, find top
posting preferable.
I have tried repeatedly to log on but can't do it. tried to get password, you
say it was was sent to my email but I never got it. so can't log on to try to
discover why my documents crash every time I access them.
Glenna Higgins
I have OOo 3.1.1 on Fedora 11 x86_64, installed from OOo, not from the
Fedora repositories. (Fedora disables too many things.)
I note on openoffice.org that 3.2 is now out and available for
download. But when I go to Help Check for Updates it says my 3.1.1 is
the latest.
At 08:37 12/02/2010 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
At 21:25 11/02/2010 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I need to use the Unicode Gear symbol as a bullet point in lists: â
Thanks, Brian, but I have gone through all the
fonts and I cannot find that character. As it is
not a common character, I wonder
Hey there all,
I am trying to set up an automatic word-count script that takes a
document in a wide array of formats (.doc, .odt, .rtf, etc) and prints
the number of words contained therein. I have been searching for a
library that handles a wide array of text formats, and the most
comprehensive
54 matches
Mail list logo
