After a recent upgrade of MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin I get this:
Jun 20 11:43:18 highland mimedefang-multiplexor[89044]: Slave 1 stderr: Failed
to run DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL SpamAssassin test, skipping: (Can't call
method bgsend on an undefined value at
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:01:11PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Is it disabling the autolearning because it already autolearned it,
maybe? Or is it disabling the autolearning because of something else
that might be going wrong?
It's disabled because you've
Lo all,
Uhm... I'm a bit worried about the below The 5
processes are also utilising close to 400MB of my swap space
USER PID %CPU
%MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT
STARTED TIME COMMANDspamd
7167 0.0 13.5 140664 140020 ?? I
2:03PM 0:03.36 spamd child (perl5.8.6)spamd
7162 0.0 12.6 130604
Hi!
A Mail is identified as spam with a score of 17 but I don't know how and
why. It is autowhitelisted and the only other score is from the rule
HTML_MESSAGE witch defaults to 0.001 points. After all the identified
spam is learned as ham ?!
Jun 18 21:01:35 fw spamd[31276]: identified
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Ron McKeating wrote:
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
Are you directly using Spamc or using Amavis or MailScanner or something
else as a wrapper. If you are using MailScanner
I get 139 errors regarding the 70_sare_whitelist.cf entries. from
3.1pre. Has the syntax for whitelist_from_rcvd changed?
Ben
I am getting an error when I run manual learning sa-learn
ham . Has anyone seen this before or have a clue how to fix it
debug: bayes: DB_File module not installed, cannot use Bayes
I am using Redhat, spamassassin 3.03 spamd,spamc, postfix
thanks
Robert Swan
Hi Robert,
You need to install the DB_File perl module. Do the
following:
perl -eshell -MCPAN
install DB_File
Cheers,
Chris
From: Robert Swan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2005 14:53To:
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Bayes learning
error
I am getting an error when
Further to my last post regarding the Mysql Backend to multiple Spamd
servers. How much difference would there be if I ran the (in this case )
2 servers on a round robin basis from exim. So over time they would both
recieve a fair enough diverse amount of mail to make them practically
Larry Rosenman ler@lerctr.org
wrote on 06/19/2005 01:46:41 PM:
Another one you might want to add to that list:
Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum
The pre-req chain for Mail::DomainKeys doesn't req it, but apparently
SA
3.1.0pre1 does.
LER
Yep, ditto here. This was with the last SVN build
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:51 +0530, Rakesh wrote:
Ron McKeating wrote:
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
Are you directly using Spamc or using Amavis or MailScanner or
At 08:18 AM 6/20/2005, Chris Knipe wrote:
Uhm... I'm a bit worried about the below The 5 processes are also
utilising close to 400MB of my swap space
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
spamd7167 0.0 13.5 140664 140020 ?? I 2:03PM
I've used local MySQL on several SA servers before now (without a
cluster). It worked well. I used the same bayes database to 'seed' all
of the servers so they at least started with the same data.
I didn't notice any huge differences in scores and on the whole it
worked well - if inelegantly.
--On Sunday, June 19, 2005 8:16 PM -0400 Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
How does one read this chart? (Ideally I'm looking for an answer in the
wiki, but I couldn't find one there. I thought it might be in the FAQ or
under
Does anyone have a rule that will score foreign characters or characters with
the dashes on top?
Below is example email that is not scoring at all for me.
Thanks
Bryan
berton laurence [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/18/2005 7:52 PM
ТРАНСБЛОК XXI
Наша компания оказывает юридические
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
A Mail is identified as spam with a score of 17 but I don't know how and
why. It is autowhitelisted and the only other score is from the rule
HTML_MESSAGE witch defaults to 0.001 points.
First, ignore the white in autowhitelist. It's a score averager. It
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Ron McKeating wrote:
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
If it is exiscan you are currently using, then I guess you currently
have something
First, the AWL isn't a whitelist. Period. It's a score averager.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
I have a particular address whitelisted via spamassassin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, that command does not whitelist a sender.
It adds ONE message scored at -100 to the sender's
I know some of the rules at SARE: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htmare aimed at English only environments, and will score non English e-mail higher. Look for the .cf files with _eng in the names. "Bryan Haase" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/20/2005 11:30 AM
Does anyone have a rule that will score
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Bart Verwilst wrote:
Does SA 3.1.0 have support for expiring bayes and AWL data? SA 3.0 just
keeps filling the mysql databases containing this data endlessly.. My db
has a couple of million entries now and still growing, and there is no
way to clean em
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:50:09 +0100, in local.spamassassin you wrote:
Jun 20 11:43:18 highland mimedefang-multiplexor[89044]: Slave 1 stderr:
Failed to run DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL SpamAssassin test, skipping:
(Can't call method bgsend on an undefined value at
We are looking at upgrading from V2 to V3 of Spamassassin. The previous
system person installed milter-spamc to link into sendmail with the v2
product (v2.6'ish I think).
Since we are looking at the Spamassassin upgrade, are there any
corresponding upgrades mandatory for milter ?
Since the
Marco Herrn wrote:
Hi,
I am using spamd and told it to listen only on the local interface:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps aux|grep spamd
root 1764 0.0 3.0 34456 30672 ? SNs Jun01 0:00 /usr/bin/perl
-T
-w /usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 06:17:25PM +0200, Marco Herrn wrote:
udp 368 0 *:34602 *:*
10608/spamd child
udp 368 0 *:34603 *:*
10608/spamd child
udp 368 0 *:34604
Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 06/20/2005 12:48:21 PM:
We are looking at upgrading from V2 to V3 of Spamassassin. The previous
system person installed milter-spamc to link into sendmail with the
v2
product (v2.6'ish I think).
Since we are looking at the Spamassassin upgrade,
I have installed SpamAssassin v3.1.0pre on a test system running Solaris
8, Perl 5.8.5, and Razor 2.67. I got the following message when I lint:
# spamassassin --lint
[15182] warn: razor2: razor2 check failed: No such file or directory
Can't use an undefined value as a SCALAR reference at
I had good luck eliminating this by using sa-learn. It took about 15
messages
before the score went high enough to register as spam.
Shelley Waltz
Bryan Haase said:
Does anyone have a rule that will score foreign characters or characters
with the dashes on top?
Below is example email that is
Craig Jackson wrote:
Regarding the report that is made part of the header, instead of a
summary of the email (which makes downloading tiresomely long even on a
high speed connection), I would like to see only the text that tripped
each particular test. Users often want to know what exactly in
Hey Michael (or anyone else who sees this) -
I'm in the process of switching over spamd to use mysql instead of flat
files for user preferences - here's my dilemma:
The doc for 2.6 (I'm using 3.04 but in principle I believe it's the
same) makes not of making sure the correct username (email
Yeah, I'm seeing that too, see the bug here:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4410
* Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/
* (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area
* (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free
Ryan == Ryan L Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ryan Does dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net list all the dynamic IPs?
Ryan Or just the dynamic IPs which fall in spamtrap?
It includes IP addresses that are not dynamic as well. It seems to
make unintelligent guesses as well
==John ffitch
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:34:26AM -0500, Andy Jezierski wrote:
I've noticed that when starting up SA 3.1 the main spamd process doesn't
change userid's like 3.0.x did. It stays as root but the child processes
do switch over. Is this normal?
Yes. The parent now stays as root so that
Bryan Haase asked Monday, June 20, 2005 0830:
Does anyone have a rule that will score foreign characters or characters with
the dashes on top?
Below is example email that is not scoring at all for me.
Thanks
Bryan
berton laurence [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/18/2005 7:52 PM
Ben Hanson wrote:
I get 139 errors regarding the 70_sare_whitelist.cf entries. from
3.1pre. Has the syntax for whitelist_from_rcvd changed?
Ben
This is due to the comments Bob had at the end of each entry, without a
# before them.
He was going to correct this prior to the 3.1 release. I
The current one from SARE works fine :)
And, the latest RDJ has support for all the SARE rules.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US
I installed on CentOS which I have never done before. Everything is okay
except for one thing. I get
[28414] warn: config: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
HASHCASH_HIGH
+ 7 ever HASHCASH rule warnings in --lint
all the other output is exactly like on my other non-CentOS
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
30_text_de.cf:lang de describe HASHCASH_HIGH Enthält korrekte
Hashcash-Kennzeichnung ( 25 bits)
50_scores.cf:score HASHCASH_HIGH -5.000
Where's that warning coming from?
Perhaps the ä?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
Craig Jackson wrote:
Regarding the report that is made part of the header, instead of a
summary of the email (which makes downloading tiresomely long even on a
high speed connection), I would like
Hello Ben,
Monday, June 20, 2005, 6:50:46 AM, you wrote:
BH I get 139 errors regarding the 70_sare_whitelist.cf entries. from
BH 3.1pre. Has the syntax for whitelist_from_rcvd changed?
BH Ben
Which version of 70_sare_whitelist.cf? What are the errors?
Yes, the syntax for whitelist_from_rcvd
Hello All.
We have a smarthost running spamassassin in the permiter, this host
relays email for our internal domains to an M$ Exchange server in our
private LAN. Spamassassin is doing a great job in filtering most
spams.
I get my MS Exchange users to drop any 'Undetected SPAM' to a folder
I'll be using the SA 3.0.4 and not the pre version. Hopefully that will help.
I'll have to check to see which version of milter-spamc they are using however.
I was afraid the the products had to be built with version specific libraries, or something similar, that would make a simple
Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
phishing emails ? Phishing emails are not sent using the same bulk mailing
software spammers use. Spammers most of the time dont even understand SMTP
451 retry but phishermen do. Also, phish doesn't go with spam and ham..its
From: Murty Rompalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quite fair - look at all the ham the rules hit. They are not very
good rules.
{^_^}
Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
phishing emails ? Phishing emails are not sent using the same bulk mailing
software spammers use.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I did get this and other replies from list users! My rule does not assign
a score of 5.0 (threshold to call it spam for sure). So, an email can
still get a score of 4.0 from my phish block rule and still go through
unless ofcourse you changed the
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:01:15PM -0400, Murty Rompalli wrote:
Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
phishing emails ?
Sure, why not? Phish mails are spam.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Special? Our longest phone conversation is 'Get over here.' - Ross on ER
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:05:32PM -0400, Murty Rompalli wrote:
Also, I believe PGP signed messages cause a negative score. Can someone
confirm this one, I am lazy after a long day. I know TRUSTED_HOSTS has a
negative score to compensate, just dont know if PGP signed carries
negative score
Our inbound/outbound SMTP mail is traversing via MessageLabs..
Cut a long story stort - I want to bypass messagelabs (costs) and
implement an (in-house) Antispam solution.
(domain1.com) I have 12 (W2K/Linux) Domino Servers including the (w2k)
Passthru Server.
(domain2.com) I have 1 2003
Hallo und guten Morgen List,
I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new
2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes:
--snip
warning: description for HTML_SHOUTING4 is over 50 chars
warning: description for CLICK_TO_REMOVE_1 is over 50 chars
warning: description for
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:31:01AM +1000, SSK1 wrote:
Basically I would like to know if it's possible to have a
linux/SpamAssassin server receive smtp traffic and then pass it on to
the passthru/exchange server once checked.
If it is possible, apart from Spamassassin, what other ingredients do
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:41:41AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new
2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes:
warning: description exists for non-existent rule T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T
Hrm. You seem to have some development rule files
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo,
Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 04:33 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:41:41AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
I`ve updated from SA 2.64 to 3.0.4. I use SA with amavisd-new
2.3.1. When I try spamassassin --lint -D comes:
warning: description exists for
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:59:30AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
warning: description exists for non-existent rule T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T
Mmh. wget from
http://www.apache.de/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.gz
I`ts no development.
Aha. So there are three things here. First,
Hallo und guten Morgen Theo,
Heute (am 21.06.2005 - 05:28 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
lang de describe T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LIST_T Senderechner in IADB-Liste
(www.isipp.com)
sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is
(see attachment warning.txt)
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 06:05:10AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
sorry, but that`s not all. lint has 187 issues detected. Which is
(see attachment warning.txt)
The warnings are all covered by my previous message. The description over 50
chars warning is known and apparently unavoidable for German.
Theo, I thought the warning on rule name length and description length had
either been eliminated to drastically lengthened for non-English rules. Or was
this only in the 3.1 stream? I know there was work done on this somewhere.
Loren
Thank you for the report but is it fair to run masses for filtering
phishing emails ? Phishing emails are not sent using the same bulk mailing
software spammers use. Spammers most of the time dont even understand SMTP
451 retry but phishermen do. Also, phish doesn't go with spam and ham..its
On a brand new RHEL4 installation, I've having problems with Net::DNS:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug: Net::DNS version: 0.51
debug: trying (3) apache.org...
debug: looking up NS for 'apache.org'
debug: NS lookup of apache.org failed horribly = Perhaps your
resolv.conf isn't
58 matches
Mail list logo
