From: Jeff Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,Jdow,
I think you have misunderstood me.I'm not working for Netzero.In fact,our mail systems'
end-users numbers are more than a hundred million far away.We use SA as part of our
antispam mechanism. Certainly,it's not the original one written with Perl.We
Hi
Seems something has gone wonky with my SA install - From my cron logs it
seems that a rdj update happenned last night and then during the --lint
phase this was the output below - I am as far as i'm aware fully upto
date with my SA install and a cpan install Mail::SpamAssassin tells me
Seems something has gone wonky with my SA install - From my cron logs it
seems that a rdj update happenned last night and then during the --lint
phase this was the output below - I am as far as i'm aware fully upto
date with my SA install and a cpan install Mail::SpamAssassin tells me
there
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
snippage
I don't seem to be getting any email from RDJ recently. Maybe
since the time I switch this system from fetchmail to a mailfile,
and
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
snippage
I don't seem to be getting any email from RDJ recently. Maybe
since the time I
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:25:02AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 23:20, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:59:02PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
A snippet or 3 from a 'crontab -l' as root:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
06 22 * * * /etc/init.d/asmb restart
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
snippage
I don't seem to be getting any email from RDJ recently.
I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
please continue). Currently, I use ASSP which isn't very effective but
helps a lot.
Occasionally, I'll get fed up and dig into implementing SA instead but
then stop short after readying about how it doesn't run as a service
I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
please continue). Currently, I use ASSP which isn't very
effective but
helps a lot.
Occasionally, I'll get fed up and dig into implementing SA
instead but
then stop short after readying about how it doesn't run as a service
Im runnning SA using ALT-N Mdaemon for my mail and I dont have
any problems with it running on XP Professional
-Original Message-
From: Chris Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 10:26 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: How easy is Spam Assassin
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:48:09PM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
So, I suppose the question is: How do you deal with getting forwarded
mail through to AOL without being branded as a spammer?
You stop forwarding email to AOL...
Dave Pooser wrote:
If you are seeing the AOL members addresses then I'd like to know
what you did to receive them, because you appear the only one is
several list I belong to that are discussing this very issue that is
seeing those addresses.
I'd also like to get the AOL member's address,
Title: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
Do you have to constantly tune your rules? How often do you
need to do
this for it to be effective?
Some honest feedback and maybe a link or two would be helpful.
Implementing SA on a win32 doesn't seem like it'd be too
difficult,
Hello,
Has anyone written any rules to catch the following types of spam
http://nisk.creenet.com/~cconn/sa/
They consist of a few lines of text (sometimes), and a .gif attachment that
is in fact some penny stock being pushed.
Thanks in advance,
Chris
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:42, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
snippage
I
I catch them all, for example:
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.0 ICAB_FW2 ICAB_FW2
* 1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type=
entry
* 1.9 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200 bytes of
words
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 6.0
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Gene Heskett wrote:
And exactly what, and where can I get this 'verp'? Many mailing lists
I'm on could make good use of this feature.
If you run a mailing list, read the documentation for your program. If you
don't, ask the person who does run it to read the
* 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
So 6.0 point for your BAYES I hope your BAYES is well trained and never gets
corrupted
Maurice Lucas
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 17:44 +0100, Ruben Cardenal wrote:
I catch them all, for example:
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.0
I'm getting hammered by these as well, usually scoring below 2 points. I'm
running most of the standard SARE rules (including SARE_STOCKS). Any advice?
Bayes training has (so far) been ineffective.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Chris Conn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
Hi Ruben,
Sorry to be such a nube, but can you tell me exactly what I need to do to
impliment what is working for you.
These damn image files are killing us.
Thanks,
Joey
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Cardenal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 11:45 AM
To:
* 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
So 6.0 point for your BAYES I hope your BAYES is well trained and never
gets corrupted
Works like a charm :)
Ruben
* 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
So 6.0 point for your BAYES I hope your BAYES is well trained and never
gets corrupted
Works like a charm :)
i've only dared goto a 3 however so far so good
I get a ton of these. However, I've also got about 30 spamtrap addresses
aliased to my account. I also run my SA threshold at 7, so those two factors
probably account for a lot of the reason I get so many.
Anyway, the SARE stock rules help quite a bit, but I still see a fair number
of these
Hi Joel,
Well, I have spamassassin scoring as spam from 3.0 on, and until 14 gets
quarantined for review for messages not scoring BAYES_99. Almost 250.000
messages scoring over 14 with only 1 FP being rejected (and was quite an
unusual situation).
That kind of mails have all Fw: 12345,
-Original Message-
From: Bret Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:56 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
please continue).
So if I use postfix I'm SOL?
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Cardenal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 1:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: GIF stock spams
Hi Joel,
Well, I have spamassassin scoring as spam from 3.0 on, and until 14 gets
Sorry wasn't thinking, should this work?
header ICAB_FW2 Subject =~ /^Fw:\s\d{1,9}$/i score ICAB_FW2 1
score ICAB_FW2 4
describe ICAB_FW2 IMAGE SPAM
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Cardenal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 1:02 PM
To:
IF your mails have that kind of subject too, yes, but is malformed:
header ICAB_FW2 Subject =~ /^Fw:\s\d{1,9}$/i
score ICAB_FW2 4
describe ICAB_FW2 IMAGE SPAM
(ICAB is related to my work, feel free to change it)
Ruben.
-Mensaje original-
De: Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
-Original Message-
From: Herb Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 12:25 PM
To: 'SpamAssassin Users'
Subject: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
-Original Message-
From: Bret Miller
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
posts at code-paste sites.
I don't think we have a policy about it specifically.
hi theo,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
posts at code-paste sites.
I don't think we have a policy about it
OpenMacNews wrote:
hi theo,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
posts at code-paste sites.
I don't
Hi,
I've added my email address like:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to a whitelist.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin and sent a GTUBE email. It
was still flagged. Is this normal, expected behavior?
Thanks,
Joel
Matt Kettler wrote:
OpenMacNews wrote:
hi theo,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
posts at code-paste
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:48:34PM -0600, Joel Gudknecht wrote:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to a whitelist.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin and sent a GTUBE email. It
was still flagged. Is this normal, expected behavior?
Yes. Here's some thoughts:
You shouldn't try whitelisting your own
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
posts at code-paste sites.
I don't think we have a policy about it specifically. Generally speaking
though,
OpenMacNews a écrit :
Matt Kettler wrote:
OpenMacNews wrote:
hi theo,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
bounce? aheh? bounce to whom? if you bounce to the list, you'll be
unsubscribed. if you bounce to the original sender, you'll get block
listed, may be even bombed, hated, and your photos will be sent to fox
news :).
i said discard/bounce ...
i bounce to people i consider friendly, to let
From: jp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:48:09PM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
So, I suppose the question is: How do you deal with getting forwarded
mail through to AOL without being branded as a spammer?
You stop
On Friday 24 February 2006 20:11, jdow wrote:
From: jp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:48:09PM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
So, I suppose the question is: How do you deal with getting
forwarded mail through to AOL
From: Chris Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
please continue). Currently, I use ASSP which isn't very effective but
helps a lot.
Occasionally, I'll get fed up and dig into implementing SA instead but
then stop short after readying
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] dbg: spf: checking EnvelopeFrom (helo=,
jdow wrote:
Of course, if AOL gets away with this then they are not a common carrier
anymore. So they become responsible for their content. Sue them for any
bad content and throw their charges in their face as evidence that they
are not a carrier, they are a content service. Nail their sorry
Chris Purves wrote:
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] dbg: spf: checking
44 matches
Mail list logo
