> Could someone tell me what configuration file i need to change in order
> to
> change the email address this email is being sent to?
>
> ***
>
> I'd check crontab (crontab -l as root, list /var/spool/cron and
> /etc/cron.* and /etc/crontab) for what is running at the time the mail
> is sent
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:43 -0500, Don Levey wrote:
> [I've not yet found in the archives something which addresses this
> question; if I missed it I apologise]
>
> I am trying to set up a system whereby I can create lists of
> addresses/servers of varying degrees of spamminess. For example, I
>
Harald Binkle wrote:
>
> What about a new eval function comparing the matches of two regular
> expression?
> If there would be a function like
>
> eval:*Equals*(/regex1/,/regex2/) and eval:NOTEquals(/regex1/,/regex2/)
>
> it would be easy *to* define rules like:
>
> a rule scoring, say with 0.8 poi
Hi,
We have our own dedicated server and I am trying to install Spamassassin on
it to stop all the spam we get when looking in our horde imp webmail.
Our server is linux based and I have full access to the root command line. I
have uploaded the unzipped files to a directory and tried following t
Dave_c00 wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 05:29:28 -0800 (PST):
> I
> have uploaded the unzipped files to a directory and tried following the
> installation readme file but am having no luck in getting it working..?
This is absolutely lame. "I followed the instructions but it isn't
working". Well, then
All I want it to do is add **SPAM** into the subject if it thinks it is spam,
how hard must that be..!!
I have run the 'perl Makefile.PL' in the correct directory but the 'make
install' isn't working.
Am I correct in thinking I need to get spamd running as a proccess before I
can get specific co
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 05:52 -0800, dave_c00 wrote:
> All I want it to do is add **SPAM** into the subject if it thinks it is spam,
> how hard must that be..!!
>
It's not:
A quick google for "spamassassin rewrite subject" turns up this helpful
link:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SubjectRewri
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 07.01.09 11:46, Craig wrote:
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP
Randy 1/6/2009 2:42 PM >>>
Post 3 similar messages on pastbin so that we can determine a common
factor between them. Use pastbin, not this list to post the
dave_c00 schrieb:
> I have run the 'perl Makefile.PL' in the correct directory but the 'make
> install' isn't working.
>
Something is going wrong!
So, you think my comment is not very helpful? Maybe your desciption of
the problem is not that helpful, too. If you don't provide more
information
Dave_c00 wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 05:52:55 -0800 (PST):
> All I want it to do is add **SPAM** into the subject if it thinks it is spam,
> how hard must that be..!!
That is not what I asked for. Please provide what I asked for.
> I have run the 'perl Makefile.PL' in the correct directory but the
I dont have any package manager... The people we rent the server from are
absolutely useless and provide no help unless you pay them a small fortune.
My server details are as follows:
Linux 2.6.22-8-server i686 GNU/Linux
Perl 5.8
Spamassassin 3.2.5
I may appear thick but when it comes to Linux I
McDonald, Dan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:43 -0500, Don Levey wrote:
>> [I've not yet found in the archives something which addresses this
>> question; if I missed it I apologise]
>>
>> I am trying to set up a system whereby I can create lists of
>> addresses/servers of varying degrees of spa
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 06:51 -0800, dave_c00 wrote:
> I dont have any package manager...
It's software, not a person
> The people we rent the server from are
> absolutely useless and provide no help unless you pay them a small fortune.
> My server details are as follows:
> Linux 2.6.22-8-serv
>>> Randy 1/8/2009 8:09 AM >>>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 07.01.09 11:46, Craig wrote:
>
>> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP
>>
>
>
> Randy 1/6/2009 2:42 PM >>>
>
>> Post 3 similar messages on pastbin so that we can determine a common
>>
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 07.01.09 11:46, Craig wrote:
> >
> >> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP
> >>
> >
> >
> > Randy 1/6/2009 2:42 PM >>>
> >
> >> Post 3 similar messages on pastbin so that we can determine a common
> >> factor betwe
On 08.01.09 06:51, dave_c00 wrote:
> I dont have any package manager... The people we rent the server from are
> absolutely useless and provide no help unless you pay them a small fortune.
> I may appear thick but when it comes to Linux I am completely lost...
>
> I think I am using qmail if that
dave_c00 wrote:
I dont have any package manager... The people we rent the server from are
absolutely useless and provide no help unless you pay them a small fortune.
My server details are as follows:
Linux 2.6.22-8-server i686 GNU/Linux
Perl 5.8
Spamassassin 3.2.5
I may appear thick but when it
Thanks for the reply.
Yeah I think it is Ubuntu 6.06 which I found in my /etc/lsb-release file.
Do you mean use apt-get to install it.? I have found a help file which
should get me going. I have spamassassin in my /etc/ folder. Does that mean
I can install it from that location?
Daniel J McDon
Thanks for the reply.
Yeah I think it is Ubuntu 6.06 which I found in my /etc/lsb-release file.
Do you mean use apt-get to install it.? I have found a help file which
should get me going. I have spamassassin in my /etc/ folder. Does that mean
I can install it from that location?
Daniel J McDon
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 07:31 -0800, dave_c00 wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Yeah I think it is Ubuntu 6.06 which I found in my /etc/lsb-release file.
>
> Do you mean use apt-get to install it.? I have found a help file which
> should get me going. I have spamassassin in my /etc/ folder. Does t
Well using the package apt-get install spamassassin seems to have installed
it. With the following output:
apt-get install spamassassin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Suggested packages:
razor libnet-ident-perl dcc-client pyzor
Recommended packages:
spamc
The f
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> It appears to me that the HABEAS rules are hitting only a very tiny fraction
> of
> mail, many of the nightly mass-checks don't have a hit at all (or is it that
> those
> checks don't contain any network checks?). The aggregated view show
Thanks Rubin,
I tend to get things done like this, bit by bit but that's how I like to
learn. Maybe I shouldnt be messing around with my webserver that has many an
ecommerce website or 2 running on it...!
Thanks for the help.
Rubin Bennett wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 07:31 -0800, dave_c0
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 15:37, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> It appears to me that the HABEAS rules are hitting only a very tiny fraction
>> of
>> mail, many of the nightly mass-checks don't have a hit at all (or is it that
>> those
>> chec
> If you are running Linux, there IS a package manager installed. We
> simply need to figure which one. It would help if you know the flavor on
> Linux you are using. I know the hosting company does because they
> probably asked which distro. you want to use.
>
One way to get more details of ex
On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:10 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, January 6, 2009 03:11, Matt Kettler wrote:
Check your .pre files to make sure the shortcircuit plugin is loaded
in one of them. (Note: loadplugin statements added to local.cf will
NOT work, they should be in the .pre files)
is this
Hi,
Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin in
Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is processed.
This script would have to know , , and assigned by SA>. Is it possible?
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:05:52 +0300, "JVlad" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin in
>Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is processed.
>This script would have to know , , and assigned by SA>. Is it possible?
Many mail packa
JVlad wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:05:52 +0300:
> Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin in
> Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is processed.
> This script would have to know , ip>, and assigned by SA>. Is it possible?
Wouldn't it make
Hi,
Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin in
Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is processed.
This script would have to know , , and . Is it possible?
Many mail packages have built in SA support. What are you using?
(apologies if this ha
Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin in
Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is processed.
This script would have to know , , and . Is it possible?
Wouldn't it make more sense to do this in procmail? (assuming you use
procmail).
Thanks, K
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, JVlad wrote:
sendmail + spamassassin milter (written by Georg C. F. et al)
everything works great so far, except I need to save the spamassassin
results (score+sender) and do this synchronously, right after the score
is calculated.
How about a perl script that opens a rea
sendmail + spamassassin milter (written by Georg C. F. et al)
everything works great so far, except I need to save the spamassassin
results (score+sender) and do this synchronously, right after the score
is calculated.
How about a perl script that opens a reader on
"
Thanks, but is there a wa
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:12:47PM +0300, JVlad wrote:
> Thanks, but is there a way to get this perl script executed as part of
> Spamassassin work and pass there score, ip, and address?
> Does spamassassin support such post-processing plugins?
Yes, though unfortunately writing plugins is rather
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:12:47 +0300, "JVlad" wrote:
>>> sendmail + spamassassin milter (written by Georg C. F. et al)
>>> everything works great so far, except I need to save the spamassassin
>>> results (score+sender) and do this synchronously, right after the score
>>> is calculated.
>>
>> How
Thanks, but is there a way to get this perl script executed as part of
Spamassassin work and pass there score, ip, and address?
Does spamassassin support such post-processing plugins?
Yes, though unfortunately writing plugins is rather badly documented. :(
ah, it explains everything.
If you "
"JVlad" wrote:
> Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin
> in Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is
> processed. This script would have to know , ip>, and . Is it possible?
Have you considered making your perl script "call" spamassassin?
S
I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
*...@fbpc.com
But outgoing emails are still getting stopped as spam. The whitelist seems
to be recognized in the headers, but the subject line still gets tagged with
a {SPAM} and the mail gets kicked back to me.
Here are the
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 23:12 +0300, JVlad wrote:
> >> sendmail + spamassassin milter (written by Georg C. F. et al)
> >> everything works great so far, except I need to save the spamassassin
> >> results (score+sender) and do this synchronously, right after the score
> >> is calculated.
> >
>
What
fbpc a écrit :
> I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
> *...@fbpc.com
>
don't do that. now spammers know how to evade your filters.
use reject_from_rcvd or reject_from_auth instead.
but wait. this looks like spam to me. if it is, why are you sending it?
> But ou
At 12:54 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
*...@fbpc.com
But outgoing emails are still getting stopped as spam. The whitelist seems
to be recognized in the headers, but the subject line still gets tagged with
a {SPAM} and the mail gets
Hi!
I sent this email to the amavisd-new group but didn't received any replies
I give it a spin on this group
Maybe someone can help
Thanks in advance
Eddy
- original email
Hi!
We are using Postfix 2.5.5 on our RHEL AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6)
academic server.
amavisd-
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 6-Jan-2009, at 08:51, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> I realize that HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI has or had a reasonable ruleqa
>> value. But, I wonder if SA should apply higher standards than that, and
>> not give negative scores to databases that don't behave reasonably.
>
>
> This has
JVlad wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:43:48 +0300:
> sendmail + spamassassin milter
ok, you are not using procmail, then my suggestion is mute. All the
information you want is available in that milter. Doesn't it have any
logging that you could use for that? Or if you know to program C (assuming
JVlad wrote on Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:45:48 +0300:
> but doesn't it mean that I'll have to parse mail once again in order to get
> score assigned by spamassassin and helo/IP address from the headers?
Yes, you have to parse the mail, but AFAIK procmail does that, anyway. You
just "match". So, you
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:12:47PM +0300, JVlad wrote:
> > Thanks, but is there a way to get this perl script executed as part of
> > Spamassassin work and pass there score, ip, and address?
> > Does spamassassin support such post-processing plugins?
>
> Yes, though unf
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, fbpc wrote:
...
X-FBPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached,
...
In light of all the other comments already given, I couldn't help to
notice the 'ORDB-RBL' in the MailScanner header. I'm assuming that is the
ordb.org RBL that's been dead for qui
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, JVlad wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin in
> >>Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is processed.
> >>This script would have to know , , and >>assigned by SA>. Is it possible?
>
> >Many mail pac
fbpc wrote:
> I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
> *...@fbpc.com
>
The above file is a MailScanner config file not a SpamAssassin config
file, it should NOT contain statements of that format. MailScanner's
whitelisting options are formatted differently (I don't
Eddy,
> I sent this email to the amavisd-new group but didn't received any replies
> I give it a spin on this group
> Maybe someone can help
Yes, this is probably a more suitable place for this question.
> We are using Postfix 2.5.5 on our RHEL AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6)
> academic server.
>
On Thu, January 8, 2009 21:54, fbpc wrote:
> I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
> *...@fbpc.com
newer use that whitelist_from anywhere !
even mailscanner can be fooled
> X-FBPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not
> cached,
> score=-47.
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 21:59 +0100, mouss wrote:
> fbpc a écrit :
> > I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
> > *...@fbpc.com
>
> don't do that. now spammers know how to evade your filters.
> use reject_from_rcvd or reject_from_auth instead.
>
> but wait. this looks
On Thu, January 8, 2009 21:59, Evan Platt wrote:
> 1. Why are you checking outgoing mail?
if he did not, maybe the sender ip will be blacklisted, much better
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 14:39 -0800, Gerald Turner wrote:
> Hello, I have been using SpamAssassin integrated with Postfix via spampd
> SMTP proxy and I have the following header_checks file:
>
> /^X-Spam-Level: \*{8,}/ DISCARD Spam score 8+
> /^X-Spam-Level: \*{4,}/ REJECT Spam score 4+
>
> The
Hi I am a relative newbie at this and you have helped me before
i have just installed the latest spamassassin on a VPS server on following
how to guides etc, all seems to be working,
my question is now that spamasaassin is installed and i have sent the test
line via email and it has marked it as
I just upgraded from SA 3.0.1 to 3.2.5 today. The bayes_journal keeps
disappearing and SA kept complaining it didn't have permission to re-create
it.
So I chmod 777 the parent directory (/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin) and
SA finally recreated the bayes_journal file. However it looks like SA
Look, I'm not sending spam, I'm sending REPLY coupons to customers. If you
don't believe me, go to my website www.fbpc.com. I believe the PORN is
triggered because the full name of the bar is the Fat Black Pussycat, which
is a neighborhood bar/nightclub in Greenwich Village. The name has existe
On Fri, January 9, 2009 02:37, boogybren wrote:
> Is there anyway to just have either root update
> bayes_journal or leave the bayes_journal there with
> 666 permissions?
remove bayes_path in your config
if defined in sitewide it needs root to update it, but if you use
bayes_path in user_prefs t
At 05:48 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
Look, I'm not sending spam, I'm sending REPLY coupons to customers. If you
don't believe me, go to my website www.fbpc.com. I believe the PORN is
triggered because the full name of the bar is the Fat Black Pussycat, which
is a neighborhood bar/nightclub in Gree
On Fri, January 9, 2009 02:48, fbpc wrote:
> I came to this forum just to get some help: how do I whitelist
> myself effectively.
i can olso ask why whitelist at all is needed ?
but here:
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=fbpc.com&submit=Go!
v=spf1 a mx ip4:64.202.0.1/16 ip4:69.94.64
boogybren wrote:
> I just upgraded from SA 3.0.1 to 3.2.5 today. The bayes_journal keeps
> disappearing and SA kept complaining it didn't have permission to re-create
> it.
>
> So I chmod 777 the parent directory (/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin) and
> SA finally recreated the bayes_journal file.
On Fri, January 9, 2009 03:08, Matt Kettler wrote:
> bayes_file_mode 0777
and any user on that host can overwrite it
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
Yes it is my server. My SPF and I have Domain Keys as well. Not sure why
that's relevant.
I have followed the instructions on the SpamAssasin website, but although
the headers show that the whitelist is recognized, the program is still
changing the subjects of my emails.
I supose I could go
On Fri, January 9, 2009 03:15, fbpc wrote:
> Yes it is my server. My SPF and I have Domain Keys as well. Not
> sure why that's relevant.
if you dont know that then remove them
> I have followed the instructions on the SpamAssasin website, but
> although the headers show that the whitelist is r
For the THIRD time, SpamAssassin is not marking the mail as Spam.
Mailscanner is. You need to ask on a mailscanner list.
At 06:15 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
Yes it is my server. My SPF and I have Domain Keys as well. Not sure why
that's relevant.
I have followed the instructions on the SpamAss
bernier wrote:
> My question is do I need to do any more configurations/run any updates
> perodically or do any more to enhance the spam filtering
> Basically what do I do next
You read the documentation; start here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
http://spamassassin.apache.org/f
The reason why I use the bayes path is because on my server (virtual private
freebsd), the SA install writes the config files to
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin instead of /etc/mail/spamassassin. So if I
don't specify bayes_path, then it will stick the bayes stuff under
/etc/mail/spamassassin.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, January 9, 2009 03:08, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>
>> bayes_file_mode 0777
>>
>
> and any user on that host can overwrite it
>
>
Yep, that's what you need if you're sharing a single bayes DB amongst
all your users. They all need to be able to write it.
The al
boogybren wrote:
> The reason why I use the bayes path is because on my server (virtual private
> freebsd), the SA install writes the config files to
> /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin instead of /etc/mail/spamassassin. So if I
> don't specify bayes_path, then it will stick the bayes stuff under
>
At 18:40 08-01-2009, Evan Platt wrote:
For the THIRD time, SpamAssassin is not marking the mail as Spam.
Mailscanner is. You need to ask on a mailscanner list.
The footer at the bottom of the original message is a hint as to why
your advice won't be understood. :-)
Regards,
-sm
At 09:48 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
The footer at the bottom of the original message is a hint as to why
your advice won't be understood. :-)
Regards,
-sm
AARGH!
Ok, unless someone here knows, I'll ask in an Eudora group... I
turned Header mode to Terse. Only shows the From, To, and subject
71 matches
Mail list logo
