= @_;
Since you're not using this as a Perl Module (OOP) my
guess is that $self contains the value you expect to be in $dom and $dom
is NULL.
Try removing $self from your argument list and make it look like:
my ($dom) = @_;
and see if that works for you.
debug statements are your friend. :)
hope this helps
alan
p +
cable tv + cable modem for $100/month deal.
I've had VOIP at home for over a year now. (included with my ADSL service)
alan
Richard Ozer wrote:
I can't wait to tell my customers that they need to get SpitAssassin.
RO
That just makes me think of 'Alumn' (referenced from the old Bugs Bunny
/ Daffy Duck cartoons)
alan
Today I got an email thru which hit ALL_TRUSTED. My mail server isn't
(BNAT'd. I haven't specifically setup trusted_networks or
(Binternal_networks but this is the first I've had a problem with it.
(B
(BI'm running RH 9 with Sendmail 8.13.3, MIMEDefang 2.49, SpamAssassin 3.02.
(B
(Bthe Recei
he perl debugger and re-issue the use command:
db2>use Digest::SHA1
This should now load without error.
Alan
Matt Kettler wrote the following on 02/02/2005 22:02:
Actually, it's limit in SA's header generation that I forgot about. I
forgot that it forces X-Spam as a prefix.
Does that mean I can have the bonus point after all?
Matt Kettler wrote the following on 02/02/2005 21:18:
At 04:09 PM 2/2/2005, Alan Munday wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote the following on 02/02/2005 17:12:
> Bonus points if you use the add_header feature to create a secondary
X-Spam-Status header that is X-Server1-Spam-Status:
>
OK Matt
I lik
;m seeing is
X-Spam-Virus set to yes.
Have I missed something here?
Thanks
Alan
ed to do so.
So how do you use add_header to modify the X-Spam headers?
Thanks
Alan
And I really wanted that bonus point.
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Alan,Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 10:59:02 AM, you wrote:AS> Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>>On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:39:14AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:>>>I have one spamd - with the default of 5 max children.>>This is likely
Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:40:35AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:>> 2. I can't figure out how to turn URIDNSBL off (I couldn't find it > >in the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf). So...how can I turn it off?>Comment out the loadplugi
Alan Shine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:59:02AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:> > I understand, but allthough I'm running 5 max children ny CPU is between 0-2% idle. > > (I have dual CPU with hyper thread
Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:39:14AM -0800, Alan Shine wrote:>> >>I have one spamd - with the default of 5 max children.>>>This is likely your problem, if you are truly processing at 16 a sec>then 5 children probably won&
r second.I don't know if it is the avarage amount of messages that SA can proccess.anyway - 16 per second is not good enough for me - because the spam catch rate is very low - I must add more rules to it.
oh, and another thing - My computer has very low swap rate - so it's probably not th
not - what can I do in order to improve it.
Regards,
Alan
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
with RH9 as new builds, which do show this insecure
dependency.
I know its not an SA problem just wondered if someone had tracked down a 'fix'
Thanks
Alan
n
Are you sure you have a problem?
The mail log shows postfix bouncing the message.
Alan
is being delivered via localhost instead of
ezwsmtp03.xm-radio.com and therefore not meeting the criteria
requirements of that whitelist entry. Like I said, I haven't tested
this theory... just an idea off the top of my head.
hope this helps
alan
based on its results. (which I personally feel isn't such a great tactic
for just THIS reason)
you should check that out, but considering the lack of any useful
information, we can't offer you any further assistance.
alan
amassassin/auto-whitelist
auto_whitelist_file_mode 0777
auto_whitelist_db_modules GDBM_File
Does anyone have any thoughts on why AWL is not working here? Are there some
initiation procedures that need to be run?
Thanks
Alan
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
William Stearns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...snip...
If you're ever in the SF Bay Area and would like to get together, drop
me a line. I've met with Jeff a few times.
if any of you are ever in tokyo, i'd be down for meeting up for drinks
or something.
alan
ed from the SpamAssassin-announce
list was the one for version 2.64 sent 4 August 2004. Maybe it's not
being used anymore. Has anyone received more recent announcements?
Alan
s resolved? I didn't see
anything on bugzilla about it.
obviously I could force install, but i really prefer not doing that if I
can avoid it.
alan
nning perl 5.6.1 and the 9.0 system is running perl
5.8.0
I didn't find any information on bugzilla regarding this.
any ideas?
thanks,
alan
d to do so ?
many thanks
matt
Matt,
I'm not all that familiar with spamass-milter, however I can say that
you can do what you want to do with MIMEDefang (another milter)
alan
I've had a new variant of a Nigerian spam arrive this morning.
The text is laid out differently than I usually see, anyway, it managed to
score negatively so I just wanted to check if there is a repository for
depositing it as a sample? On one of the wiki's or the SARE site?
Thanks
Alan
s.
can anyone give me some insight?
thanks
alan
P.S. in the past i've refrained from sending the "why didn't this mail
score higher" types of messages to the list, but I've been seeing a
pattern of hitting BAYES_99 and not many other rules.
Original Message ---
jdow wrote:
(B> From: "alan premselaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B> To: "xoops$B
(B> Cc:
(B> Sent: 2004 December, 02, Thursday 23:27
(B> Subject: Re: spamd does not start
(B>
(B>
(B>
(B>>xoops$B>
(B>>>Hi,
(B>>>
xoops$B Hi,
(B>
(B> I have newly installed spamassassin-3.0.1 into linux box 2.4.18-22 running
(B> qmail with qmail-queue patch.
(B> Having a trouble to start spamd with SPAMDOPTIONS="-x -u spamd -H /home/spamd
(B> -d":
(B>
(B> "Starting spamd: Bareword "SO_REUSEPORT" not allowed while
d BAYES_99, but i'm
concerned about what other effects that might have ...
not sure if this information will be helpful or not, but thought i'd
share anyways.
alan
p.s. I'm using SA 3.01 with MIMEDefang 2.49 on this machine. no 3rd
party rulesets installed.
racters so the regex
might night be accurate. (still working on that)
alan
anese emails hitting when they're tagged as false
positives?
I'm based in Japan, just recently upgraded to SA 3.01 with MD 2.49 and
using a MySQL based bayes database and I've been noticing some
quirkiness with Japanese email as well, but haven't really pinned it
down yet.
alan
Brent - for information:
Version line: # $Revision: 1.19 $
Lint output: warning: description for BCS_XMFLAG_AUTH is over 50 chars
Unless x_headers should not be used in 3.xx?
Alan
/perl -T -w (instead of
/usr/bin/perl5.8.5) to prevent the same kind of confusion should you
ever upgrade perl again.
alan
1300+ mail files in the directory.
anyways, it seems to me like either the file you're telling it to read
is either not there, or it's been moved while it was open.
hope this helps
alan
ildir format. without it it'll default to mbox format in the
directory you specify. (which explains the behavior you witnessed)
this is the default behavior for any procmail that has been installed
via RPM that I've used on RedHat linux. If compiled from source your
mileage may vary.
alan
at least it resolved the problem for me)
hope this helps.
alan
ctive. the system i'm not having the problem with, has an active bayes
database.
any assistance will of course be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
alan
e
active. the system i'm not having the problem with, has an active bayes
database.
any assistance will of course be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
alan
Just saw this posted this morning:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4004125.stm
I'm suspecting the "link" points to the infected machine that is distributing
the malmail. Clearly to avoid SURBL catching it.
Alan
elative score without previous setting in SpamAssassin
> configuration, skipping: score VIRUS_WARNING412
> Unhelpful 'virus
> warning' (412)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike.
>
Just for clarification, after this update:
Lint fails on 3.0.1 here
Lint does not fail for 2.6.3 here.
Alan
thing continue to work alright?
have I encountered a little bug?
thanks,
Alan
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
re SA will test
for it? I noticed a reference on a Debian site to a hashcash application. Or
is it sufficient to have sha1sum loaded?
Thanks
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:32 AM
> To: spam
> Subject: upgrade not going to plan
>
>
> Just completed an upgrade to v3.0 from 2.63.
> SA not accepting *any* external connections on the one mailhub i
> upgraded on.
there was a very low percentage of the total UCE for this domain hitting
the tertiary
- most of the UCE is hitting the secondary
- not a single connection to the tertiary, that was greylisted, was
re-presented.
NRR
Alan
PS Has Chris been on the happy pill's?
ics::Distributions) needed for spamassassin-tools.
>
> Unless you're planning to do development (and even then it's
> not needed), I wouldn't bother with spamassassin-tools.
Theo
No, I'm not up to doing development... yet.
Thanks for the information.
Alan
ven when I feed SA an email with a non-existant from domain, this rule is not
hit. Anyone have any ideas on how I should proceed?
Thanks!
-Alan
assin-tools.
I just wanted to check the best method of getting these modules as I know RH
can be a bit fussy and I want to avoid getting modules in the wrong part of
the perl tree.
Thanks
Alan
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:43:59 -0600 (MDT), in
gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general "Lucas Albers"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>set that in the web interface.
>Subcribe, but don't receive email.
What web interface? I don't see any mention of that in the email
head
Congrats on the 3.0 release everyone. Now all I have to do is wait for my
ISP to upgrade.
I get about 4,000-5,000 spams per week. Roughly 2,000 of those pass through
SpamAssassin 2.63. I've got about 1500 of my own regex rules to handle this
problem (Eudora rocks). After white listing, these ru
Hi,
I'm using spamassassin 2.64, with Mandrake linux 9.2, on Compaq evo (Pentium 4, 2.4Ghz, 512MB Ram).
I'm sending it eml files (from my company's mail DB - in order to find spam saved in the DB), via java program, using spamd(with Bayes DB, no DCC, Pyzor etc. is used)..
-when I have one proce
201 - 251 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
