ore) and 6
cores. What would be the best settings? Or how would I determine the
best settings?
Thanks!
Jim
es... just make sure you do it as the zimbra user so your environment
is established.
HTH,
Jim
- On May 27, 2019, at 5:13 AM, hg user wrote:
> Ok, sorry for my bad answers...
> I test spamassassin results using a command line:
> spamassassin -t /path/file
> sometimes I
Jim
- On Nov 8, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Bill Cole
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
> On 8 Nov 2017, at 14:12, Bill Cole wrote:
>
>> On 8 Nov 2017, at 11:16, Dianne Skoll wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:02:16 -0500
>>> Rob McEwen wrote:
>
710#842710
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 08:32, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Hi,
The thing that immediately caught my eye was the fact that in a line
such as:
Apr 2 10:31:26 oss2 spamfilter: Sat Oct 15 15:20:22 2016 [2758] info:
spamd: connection from ip6-localhost [::1]:55708 to port 783, f
y logrotate
list to prevent it growing continuously.
Does this make sense to everyone?
Thank you all! I'm so grateful for your time, expertise and effort on
this.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 08:32, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Hi,
The thing that immediately caught
Hi KAM,
Thanks. I tried them both with the same results, several e-mail details, then
the summary:
61 Kbytes in 8 Requests.
They all look like valid e-mails.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 01:46, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/4/2017 8:39 PM, Jim McLachlan wrote
gards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 01:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/4/2017 8:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
If all else fails, you may want to visit syslog.conf and tell it to ignore
mail.info level messages.
Hmm, normally I agree with you, John but I'
lease accept my apologies for breaking off this conversation at this stage.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 01:29, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/4/2017 6:42 PM, Jim McLachlan wrote:
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-a-mail-server-using-postfix-do
Hi ap-ml,
This sounds interesting. Could you let me know where I should look for the
temporary files you mentioned?
I'm on the edges of my knowledge of e-mail and networking here :-)
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 01:11, ap-ml wrote:
Its almost as though the
syslog adm 2766939968 Apr 3 06:45 /var/log/syslog.2.gz
-rw-r- 1 syslog adm 7074131258 Apr 2 09:20 /var/log/syslog.3.gz
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 01:04, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Jim McLachlan wrote:
The text "info: spamd: processing message&q
uniq -c
7 postfix/cleanup
3 postfix/pickup
6 postfix/pipe
16 postfix/qmgr
3 postfix/smtp
293 postfix/smtpd
Port 783 isn't open to the outside world.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 00:48, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/4/2017 7:35
ick check. The messages cover the 6 minute period:
Apr 4 23:24:26 to 23:30:40
The text "info: spamd: processing message" appears in that 162,761
times.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 05/04/17 00:24, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/4/2017 7:06 PM, Jim McLachlan w
mail.* logs are rotated weekly. I'll change that so
they're rotated daily. That will certainly help, but I'm sure it would be good
for the disk and CPU if I can reduce the amount of data being logged.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 04/04/17 23:55, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4
al spamassassin behaviour that isn't usually logged, or is
it doing something unusual?
It seems to check all of them and log each check every time a new e-mail gets
processed.
Something must be set to verbose somewhere, but I haven't found it yet.
Kind regards
second one seems to be after-the-fact, so I think I could modify the first
one. Should this be cut down to:
$SPAMASSASSIN -x -E -s $MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE
to avoid the logging process?
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 04/04/17 23:19, Dave Wreski wrote:
Hi,
I thought spamfilter
, but not discarded.
#
# Modified by Jeremy Morton
I can post the whole file if it would help. It's only 54 lines.
Hope that helps.
Current log file is up to 165 Gb.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On 04/04/17 22:41, Dave Wreski wrote:
Hi,
My s
t gets processed and what I can do to fix this. I
reduced the problem slightly yesterday by preventing all these messages getting
logged to syslog at the same time.
Kind regards.
Jim.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:26:54 -0400
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dianne Skoll
>> > you should not have to pay for delisting one IP.
>> and with BN you are NOT paying for a delistin
ant that fine, don't
pay it.
-Jim P.
that in snail mail
postage each year.
-Jim P.
t to be.At what
point did someone realize updates were broken? Is the catalyst for
investigation/monitoring inquiries on this list? If not, would it be
possible to send this list an email at the point when it is determined
updates are broken and may take days/weeks to resolve?
-Jim P.
ou are using a 3rd party plugin because
we'd like to make sure the authors noticed the change in 3.4.1."
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7195
Regards,
Jim.
egardless of last century's history, what Reindl said makes good
sense. Highly dynamic content shouldn't have to be exported in a .pm
from svn every month.
-Jim P.
lude the fix if you want to
> confirm.
Looks good KAM. Received the updated 25_spf.cf files ~5 hours ago and
no problems since then. Thanks!
-Jim P.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 2/10/2015 9:00 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Kevin A. McGrail
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/9/2015 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>>
>>>> what
ocate object method
"check_for_spf_helo_temperror" via package "Mail:
[...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1159) line 1154,
line 36.
Feb 10 13:57:25 svr5 spamd[3922]: )
Feb 10 13:57:25 svr5 spamd[3922]: spamd: clean message (-0.1/5.0) for
test:106 in 0.2 seconds, 1642 bytes.
What can we do to help fix this?
-Jim P.
What I haven't noticed anyone else mention is that I was getting that
error message even though the perl on my Ubuntu 14.04 system is 5.18.2.
--
Jim Clausing
GIAC GSE #26, GREM-Gold, CISSP
GPG fingerprint = 4780 13A4 F33E BF4E AE86 0D64 0EFD B3E3 03BF 407A
On or about Tue, 2 Dec 2014,
#x27;t produce failures on systems that apply them (heck, Microsoft
figured that out back in the 90s). Barring that, advanced
notifications should go out indicating that future updates will break
things, or cause errors that may raise concern.
-Jim P.
x27;t numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 1023) line
> 2.
Last night's 3.003002 update spit out this:
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 490) line 1.
Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>=) at (eval
1000) line 1.
-Jim P.
gt; -Steve
Just a heads-up... that sort of biting comment is probably not welcome
on the SDLU list.
-Jim P.
od idea. If we can get existing data from trustable sources such as
> registries, we can add that to the source RBL and then only query the new
> ones.
>
I haven't been following this whole thread.
I always thought it odd to look for new domains. I tend to think that
everything is new unless it's been seen before (and there's a bunch of data
out there on existing domains)
-Jim P.
look at
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/opendmarc/
> >
>
> I proposed a DMARC plugin for spamassassin on the dmarc mailing list
> last year, to make it easier for people to give DMARC a spin. They
> didn't really like the idea (I still do), because a simple plugin
> wouldn't do the report sending, which is an important part of DMARC.
>
> Regards,
> Tom
>
Sending reports can leak data (think: HIPAA). Know what you are leaking to
others.
-Jim P.
am 12.02.14 03:50 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail :
Jim, what did you comment out more specifically?
Jim Knuth wrote:
am 12.02.14 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
in
am 12.02.14 03:20 schrieb Mark Martinec :
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2014-02-12 02:33, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Util.pm and AskDNS.pm both are available. What must
> I do? Any ideas or solution greatly appreciated. Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7007
as i read
am 12.02.14 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
in v340.pre.
if you have found workaround aswell post it to the ticket :)
i might be wroung
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id
am 12.02.14 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
in v340.pre.
if you have found workaround aswell post it to the ticket :)
i might be wroung
yes, I'll do that.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
am 12.02.14 02:39 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:33, Jim Knuth wrote:
Util.pm ans AskDNS.pm both are available. What must
I do? Any ideas or solution greatly appreciated. Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7007
as i read it you have found a bug, with
ion greatly appreciated. Thanks.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
with kind regards,
Jim Knuth
-
Lord, what fools these mortals be!
(William Shakespeare)
On May 7, 2013 1:01 PM, "Joe Acquisto-j4" wrote:
>
> >>>> Jim Popovitch 05/07/13 12:13 PM >>>
> >On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4
wrote:
> >>
> >> What I did not get was why my attempts to clarify whatever offense
&g
into body content will deliver it to my
own trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
-Jim P.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> spamass-milter also supports "--socket", so it is not limited to only spamc.
And... that is wrong. Anything passed to spamass-milter after "--"
(i.e. --socket=...) is passed on to spamc.
-Jim P.
s extra flags to it, e.g.
>> -s to send all mail up to given size to spamd (default:500KB)
>
>
> It is true that spamass-milter uses the spamc utility
spamass-milter also supports "--socket", so it is not limited to only spamc.
-Jim P.
-Jim
time
through.
The most obvious explanation, which I should've raised the first time, is
that these entries get added to the BL databases during the intervening 6-8
hours. If so, this understanding will be very helpful.
Can anyone weigh in?
Thanks again!
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Ji
Is there such a rule? Can I write one (I consider myself a bit of a Perl
wonk)?
I understand that there are few, if any, markers that definitively define
spam; and that's the beauty of the SpamAssassin architecture.
-Jim
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/15/2012 11:
ommon marker of embedding a text url within an
HTML tag containing a different URL. This seems like an obvious marker
for spam, I wonder why there isn't a rule for it.
Maybe this question is beyond the scope of a mail administrator. But I'm
interested in the SpamAssassin internals
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jim Schueler wrote:
> The attached contains two files:
> spamtoday.msg came out of a filter in my mail stream
> spamtoday.out is spamtoday.msg piped through 'spamassassin -t'
>
> This problem occurs very intermittently. Out of 300 da
we were installing) and automatically
increase situational awareness accordingly, and at some point move to
replacing images that didn't match certain referrers. I was ignored,
almost scoffed at.
-Jim P.
-Jim P.
27;s a short walk from
out-of-sync-clock-issues to root-password-issues. Does someone know,
beyond any doubt, that the system in question wasn't hacked/p0wned?
-Jim P.
pdns_resolver is an excellent replacement (until other apps crash with
libcrypto errors, leaving pdns_resolver to report errors "Timeout from
remote TCP client 127.0.0.1)
-Jim P.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 13:51, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>
>> On 10/19, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>>
>>> Is the missing entity one person, several people, many people? Was
>>> there an untimely death? I b
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:26, wrote:
> On 10/05, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:41, RW wrote:
>> > The usual reason for a hiatus is that too much spam or ham has aged-out
>> > in the corpora, and a top-up is needed.
>
> I think it's mo
ved by installing a local
DNS resolver like pdns_resolver.
-Jim P.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:41, RW wrote:
> The usual reason for a hiatus is that too much spam or ham has aged-out
> in the corpora, and a top-up is needed.
So, how do we get it top-up'ed?
-Jim P.
Since 27-Aug-2011 ?
$ ll /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org/MIRRORED.BY
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 225 2011-08-27 21:25
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org/MIRRORED.BY
~$ dig txt 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org
"1162027"
-Jim P.
am 11.08.11 00:31 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:23:38 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
cat /etc/postfix/sender_envelope_blacklist_domains
linkedin.com REJECT
.linkedin.com REJECT
the dot is not necessary
only linkedin.com REJECT - nothing more ;)
so accept bounce.linkedin.com
tc/postfix/sender_envelope_blacklist_domains
linkedin.com REJECT
.linkedin.com REJECT
the dot is not necessary
only linkedin.com REJECT - nothing more ;)
add it as a check_sender_access in postfix
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
with kind regards,
Jim Knuth
-
Nicht durch Zorn, sondern durch La
.
- jim -
PS I also turned on auto-whitelisting, which had been off before that. Not
sure if that
helped it regain its balance as well.
schrieb Michael Scheidell:
On 3/19/10 2:37 PM, Jim Knuth wrote:
schrieb Michael Scheidell:
On 3/19/10 12:31 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Release Notes -- Apache SpamAssassin -- Version 3.3.1
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz.md5
error 404
the
. :)
--
mit freundlichem Gruss
with kind regard
Jim Knuth
---
Bitte keine HTML E-Mails senden und
keine Microsoft Anhaenge. Danke.
Verwendung einer MySQL-DB eine bessere Performance zu
erwarten?
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/debian-spamassassin-sql.html
--
mit freundlichem Gruss - with kind regard
Jim Knuth
ot;exim, so the bayes
databases are also owned by exim. I was doing my sa-learn as user
"root".
Once I did an "su - exim", everything was fine.
- jim -
ery few months and start over.
- jim -
0,000 spam).
I see that my auto-whitelist file is now quite large. In just 4
months, it has grown from 0 to
335 megs. Is there a way to pare that file down? Or should I maybe just
stop spamd, delete
the file, and restart spamd? (will that do me any harm?). Thanks.
- jim -
-
m your own domain?
>
I think (IMHO) this is a bad idea .. can be faked, you know ..
--
mit freundlichem Gruss - with kind regard
Jim Knuth
#ICQ 277289867
Bitte keine geschaeftliche Anfragen.
Dies ist mein privater Account!
Please ask no business inquiries.
That is only my private account!
ient, which is already guaranteed to be a legitimate
account
on our system (as determined by an earlier LDAP lookup).
- jim -
normal
behaviour?
We are running SpamAssassin 3.25.
- jim -
-
I may be able to answer my own question, as something like this was
asked a few
weeks ago and John Hardin said that AWL is a misleading name, as it is
just giving an
"average" score, not necessarily whitelisting something. Thanks John.
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Savoy, Jim wrote:
>> [23409] dbg: locker: safe_lock: trying to get lock on
>> /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes with 300 timeout
>> [23409] dbg: locker: safe_lock: timed out after 300 seconds
>>
>> (it sat for 3 minutes at each of the two "30
advice would be greatly appreciated. We are running bayesless for
now. Thanks!
- jim -
-
sages,
and
the nspam count goes up after I'm done, but the tags afterwards remain
the
same. So it either means that these messages don't have enough
discerning
content, or that I am not using sa-learn properly. I'll try changing my
username to "exim" the next time I run it. Thanks.
- jim -
>> 0.000 0 206774 0 non-token data: nspam
>> 0.000 01515235 0 non-token data: nham
> John Hardin wrote:
>I got the impression that the goal was to have a ratio that roughly
reflected the spam:ham ratio of your raw mail stream. If
ide disparity between nham and nspam).
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.2.5.
Thanks in advance for any tips.
- jim -
ckage that provide Win32-Registry-File
ppm install DB_File
ppm install failed: Can't find any package that provide DB_File
Anyone any ideas what's wrong?
Jim
>
>
> Apparently yesterday I push the wrong button in my control
panel which
> caused our email server to block all incoming emails.
Cadet Stimpy - I specifically told you *not* to press the
[History Eraser Button]! Now look what
assin/show_bug.cgi?id=5508
>
--
mit freundlichem Gruss - with kind regard
Jim Knuth
#ICQ 277289867
Bitte keine geschaeftliche Anfragen.
Dies ist mein privater Account!
Please ask no business inquiries.
That is only my private account!
Am 24.10.2008 9:30 Uhr, schrieb mouss:
> Jim Knuth a écrit :
>> Am 24.10.2008 1:31 Uhr, schrieb mouss:
>>> Jean-Paul Natola a écrit :
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've been out of the loop for a couple of months do a rollout, so I came
&
ate rules go to /var/db/spamassassin/...
But on Debian to /var/lib/spamassassin/.. ;)
>
>
>>
>> I run site wide config
>>
>> freebsd 6.2
>
>
--
mit freundlichem Gruss - with kind regard
Jim Knuth
#ICQ 277289867
Bitte keine geschaeftliche Anfragen.
Dies ist mein privater Account!
Please ask no business inquiries.
That is only my private account!
d this early this morning CDT, I've seen no responses, am I the
> only one who saw this or caught it?
>
do you have updated perl? I`ve seen that on perl 5.10.0 (Debian testing)
--
mit freundlichem Gruss - with kind regard
Jim Knuth
#ICQ 277289867
st of the spam
that is let through. The user's spam is consistently labeled in the subject
with
[SPAM 8.3 of 2.0]rest_of_subject, etc.
Is SpamAssassin placing '[SPAM 8.3 of 2.0]' in the subject line?
Shouldn't everything with a score above a 2 be being deleted?
Maybe I
r directory
>
> What can I do to restart it? I'm running it in debian-sarge.
>
> I'm kind of very new to spam assassin, any help will be very appreciated!
>
> Thanks beforehand,
>
> /Hiram
>
so
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
or so
cd /etc/init.d/
./spa
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Dave Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, John Rudd wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A postmaster who doesn't check their logs in any f
nly catching:
Hello! I am bored today.
Hello! I am bored tonight.
Hello! I am tired today.
Hello! I am tired tonight.
But none of the afternoon/evening variations.
- jim -
ou do mean *couldn't* achieve any speedup, correct?
-Jim
PROTECTED]> 12/18/2007 6:07 AM >>>
NEVER use autolearn for Bayes. Autolearn = most evil.
I never had a problem with autolearn. I've been using it for years. Of
course, i altered the autolearn thresholds.
-Jim
> Why is my Spamassassin is reporting as
> URI 40 comcast. com? (without the spaces)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim
> -
> Jim Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> UUism Networks <http://www.UUism.net>
> Ministering to the Needs of Online UUs
> Web Hosting, Email Services, Mailing Lists
> -
>
message
without opening it. Opening spam messages might allow the spammer to verify
your email address.
If you believe that this message has been incorrectly marked as spam, please
forward this email to Jim Hermann at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pts rule name description
run with --lint and fix the problems.
-Jim
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Perkel writes:
Who finds this concept interesting?
SPAM-L. This is OT for this list.
Right, Justin, but I see that threads about general
rules look for spam signs, not RFC violations. Now whether or
not these are good spam signs I do not know...
-Jim
dreds of Spam, and my filter just seems to be completely
> ignored! It says the rule is enabled. Am I not allowed to add rules because
> I am just one user?
> Does my IT guy have to change it for me?
ask him .. ;)
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289
less prone to
forgery? Whitelist_from_spf or something similar?
-Jim
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
According to who, you?
He asked for a solution for qmail. If you d
John Rudd wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.07.07 18:47, John Rudd wrote:
As I've said for years: we should just ban attachments. They're not
really useful for anything that can't be done a better way. Which
only leaves them being useful for attacks of one form or another.
some p
ince I did it!"
Challenge response is fundamentally broken. It can not and should not
be considered an anti-spam solution.
-Jim
than 80 or 443. For some, :8080 is a no go
-Jim
to this email address as it has been automatically
generated, but email any queries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you and take care
Can this stop now please?
-Jim
Heute (08.06.2007/14:34 Uhr) schrieb arni,
> Where do i find this botnet plugin?
> arni
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
--
Zufalls-Zitat
--
Schwerere als Luft? Flugmaschine
Chris Santerre wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:02 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates?
>
>
> guenther wrote:
> > On Thu, 200
www.uribl.com and surbl.org having
issues as well. Both are now pointing to 127.0.0.1 in what I would
assume was an attempt to stop the attack. Some spammer is pissed off it
seems...
-Jim
1 - 100 of 589 matches
Mail list logo
