Re: What changes would you make to stop spam? - United Nations Paper

> Why use 2 > protocols when you can use one? Oh I don't know. Maybe because the infrastructure for it is already in place in the form of hundreds of thousands of existing mail servers that already require authentication if the message being transmitted isn't destined for a local user? > There wo

RE: Am I wasting my time with SpamCop?

> I stand corrected I was at SpamCop.com and not SpamCop.net Yes, I'm sorry, I was referring to SpamCop.net.

Am I wasting my time with SpamCop?

reporting spam via SpamCop (which wastes a lot of my time). Steve

RE: Image spams getting thru

> I'm using your rule here with a low score and in addition: > > rawbody INLINE_IMAGE2/src\s*=\s*["']cid:image001\.gif/i > describe INLINE_IMAGE2 Inline Image image001.gif > score INLINE_IMAGE2 5.0 > > I know, I should have used a meta rule intead of duplicating the > pattern. > > Will wo

RE: What changes would you make to stop spam? - United Nations Paper

mpus. We can now use tools to track (and block) spammers since we only have to watch one or two servers (SpamShield works nicely!) Steve

Text::Wrap errors in log file

version 2006.711 -- Steve Martin Personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Business: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/

RE: exim4 + forwarding + spamassassin

work was to chown the files to nobody:nobody (and, yes, I had the directory permissions set to 777 too.) Steve -Original Message- From: Thomas Lindell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:17 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: exim4 + forwa

RE: exim4 + forwarding + spamassassin

time. My spam (to my personal account) has dropped from 100+ daily down to 4 or 5. And, as someone else pointed out, if a legitimate e-mail gets rejected as spam, the sender will know that I never got it and try something different. Thanks for the help, everyone! Steve

RE: exim4 + forwarding + spamassassin

is the wording of the log entries. In the first pass, spamd says that it's "checking" the message. In the second pass it says "processing" the message. Steve -Original Message- From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 3:05 PM To

exim4 + forwarding + spamassassin

and delivered instead of rejected. Anyone know what I might be doing wrong here? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Steve Zinski University of Richmond

Re:

> unsubscribe > end list-unsubscribe:

Re: using spamdc/spamd getting better results?

Hi Yossi, > My mail relay is built on sendmail and MailScanner configured > wit SA 3.1.1. > ... > How do i start spamc? IIRC, MailScanner loads the SpamAssassin perl modules directly - it doesn't use spamc/d, nor does it use the "spamassassin" script. HTH, St-

Re: question about SpamAssassin

> We use a MTA package called Extremail (http://www.extremail.com) and I was > wondering if SpamAssasin is compatible with it. Did you check their forums at http://extremail.monsterserver.de/main.php ? They have a forum dedicated to integrating anti-spam products with their server, although it req

Re: Spamassassin doing 20% of Job

Yes, I was thinking of that. There are a few things on this server that need an update most notably a 2.6 kernel. Trouble is it's a server & it's my business. I will build up another machine & swop over. Many thanks Steve On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:28:58 -0400 Bowie Bailey

Spamassassin doing 20% of Job

ple below is typical. I have looked at the locations given in the error messages & I'm afraid they are beyond my simple brain. Can anybody give me any pointers please? Steve -- Jul 5 09:10:08 server1 spamd[4888]: connection from localhost.localdomain [

RE: outlook email is beeing flag as spam...

> -1.8 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed through trusted hosts only via SMTP > -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% > [score: 0.3371] > 0.1 HTML_90_100BODY: Message is 90% to 100% HTML > 1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML:

Re: The Future of Email is SQL

> So - like I said - this is visionary stuff. Think SQL - think outside > the box. It's not all that visionary. Microsoft's been working on WinFS - a SQL based system for storing files - for years. It's supposed to have been released as a part of longhorn (vista), but they're pushing it back. I'm

Re: The Future of Email is SQL

While this is quite an interesting topic, I have to ask why it's on the spamassassin list. Message stores aren't spamassassin specific and this is already a pretty high-volume list. Does this discussion really belong here? St-

Re: is there a way to block email coming from

> country, other than USA? How would you look up the network block on > country > such as Romania, China, Taiwan,Thailand, Korea, and so on... > > Thanks. Check out http://countries.nerd.dk/ and http://www.blackholes.us/

Re: Way OT: What do you use for anti-virus (Linux)

> Yeah ... the university got a fairly good deal on our per-user costs > for Sophos. I doubt I'd buy it for personal use, either. They don't have a consumer product. They sell exclusively to the business/government/education sectors. We use sophos on the desktop and on the mail server, called fr

Re: 3.1.2?

> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote: >> Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released? > > I was hoping to get it out this month, but I think it'll probably be next > early month before it's all ready to go. Any word on whether or not it includes a fix for bug #4590

Reference manual

Is there a reference manual with SpamAssassin, and if so were do I get a copy of it? -- Steve Sargent, Vox +44 020 7882 3220, Fax +44 020 8980 2001 QMUL Computing Services, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW page: http://www.qmul.ac.uk/~cgaa160/index.html

RE: apache httpd + spam assassin = web without spam?

> I was having this problem for a while... then I added a confirmation block > to my guestbook - so that any post had to be confirmed. > > Boom - spam stopped (I've never even gotten confirmation notices that they > tried again). I did basically the same thing. I hacked PHPBB a little to throw an

Re: Filtering based on the recipients

l http://www2.yo-linux.com/cgi-bin/mail-access (use at own risk) ...you get the idea. -- Steve Lindemann __ Network Administrator //\\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Marmot Library Network, Inc. \\// against HTML/RTF email, url: http://www.marmot.org

Limiting processes on a per user basis

Hi We have a limited number of users on our system, but it currently seems that each user can spawn 5 child processes. My question is can I use the m(X) parameter in the /home/user/.spamassassin/user_prefs file to limit the number each user can spawn? Thanks Steve

Re: This isn't being tagged

These things are being properly detected for me. Here's the headers from one I received this morning: -- Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on titan.sthomas.net X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Statu

Re: encoded spam that got thru

> Without being able to decode that block of stuff myself and thus see what > it says It's a stock spam for some oil company. Decoding anything base64 encoded is pretty easy if you have perl installed somewhere: cut #!/usr/bin/perl use MIME::Base64; print decode_base64(""); cut

Re: spamassassin/procmail lock not working

On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:36:09 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting steve downes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > In my procmail log I am getting a load of the error message below & > > spamassassin is clearl

spamassassin/procmail lock not working

In my procmail log I am getting a load of the error message below & spamassassin is clearly not doing baysian checking. --- [14539] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/steve/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File ex

Re: SA-LEARN HANGING when database over 2000 SPAM messages

> I think it was Steve that said his database is in SQL format. How do I > convert the spamassassin database on FreeBSD 5.4 to SQL? I used the procedure found on this page as a guide: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/fc4-spamassassin-sql.html

Re: SA-LEARN HANGING when database over 2000 SPAM messages

> -rw--- 1 root wheel 549775048704 Feb 28 10:47 bayes_toks I'll leave it to the experts to help you out here, but I would assume that a token db that's apparently half a terrabyte in size is a *slight* indication of a problem somewhere... ;)

Re: SA-LEARN HANGING when database over 2000 SPAM messages

> The first time I encountered this problem is when the spam database has > around 3000 SPAM and about 1 HAM, the database seems to become > corrupt. I start to receive PERL errors. > ... > Is there a problem with the database when it > reaches a certain size? I can't offer much assistance wit

Re: spamd & mysql redux

> i googled a bit and found this related to fedora3 and SELinux: > http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?11,20759,21482#msg-21482 I had seen that page, but didn't know what selinux was (thought it was a distro!) so I thought it was irrelevant. After checking it out, it turns out that that's what the pr

Re: spamd & mysql redux

>> Feb 22 11:45:42 ronin spamd[3322]: bayes: unable to connect to database: >> Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket >> '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13) > > Is that where mysql.sock is located? I don't know where the MySQL RPMs > might > stick it, but source installs stick it at /tmp/m

spamd & mysql redux

Howdy list, I'm having the exact same problem that Glenn is/was having as posted about last week. (see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/77708) I'm using Fedora Core 4, perl 5.8.6, SA 3.1.0 and mysql 4.1. SA was installed by building an RPM directly from the tarball. I

Re: cmd to restart spamd on Mac OSX

Sneyers Belgium -- Steve Martin Personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Business: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/

Re: SPF test clarification

lot of ways, I can only imagine what goofy things some other ISPs have come up with. Steve

Re: MailScanner and SpamAssassin sitewide help!

@#$%^& dnsbl.sorbs.net i took dnsbl.sorbs.net out of my sendmail config sorry, and thank you At 7:21 AM +0100 1/12/06, Uwe wrote: Steve, People who would like the help you and using a Gmail Account will receive this : Technical details of permanent failure: PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (s

MailScanner and SpamAssassin sitewide help!

OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0 on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled. Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem to get any mail to go through SpamAssassin. I tried manually st

Re: From: '' <> whitelisted?

> 1) null sender isn't in the default whitelist > > 2) the rule matched isn't due to the default whitelist, as that would show > up as > USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST, instead of USER_IN_WHITELIST. I guess I need to brush up on my SA rules vocabulary.. :) > 3) The message in question has the null path a

Re: From: '' <> whitelisted?

> How is it that this (weird, sort-of-null) From: address is whitelisted? > It's surely not listed in my local.cf or user_prefs. Any ideas? >From RFC 2821: If an SMTP server has accepted the task of relaying the mail and later finds that the destination is

Re: Recurring abuser

> My MailScanner boxes are still getting drilled with the Sober.Virus and spam (none which have made it through) from a single IP address. I did a lookup on dnsstuff.com for the address {66.243.13.178} but made no headway on what to do about this. What steps do I need to do in order to get this

Wristwatches and chronometers

Has anyone developed a rule for the current onslaught of wristwatch spam? Thanks in advance, -steve-

Re: IE_VULN 100.00 ?

hence my > posting to this list. Yes - it's definitely being mistaken. IE_VULN was a ruleset added to MailScanner's spam.assassin.prefs.conf to catch a nasty IE bug a while back. It's dead and buried now - so you can safely remove the rule. Cheers, Steve.

Errors from spamassassin -r

Please can anyone explain the error messages below? (N.B each of the known spam messages has been recently delivered without scoring 5 or over.) -- $ spamassassin -r < known_spam_msg_a DCC -> report failed: Exited with non-zero exit code 67 1 message(s) examined. $ spamassassin -r < known_s

Joe-jobbed...What are my options?

uot; Sorry if this is really simple... any advice would be useful. Thanks, Steve

Re: Very simple user query...

jdow wrote: I absolutely do not want to report automatically - in the sense that I am adamant that I want human intervention before reporting. Conversely - given the task of establishing a remote shell; finding the correct email in maildir - and verifying it is indeed the mail I determined w

Re: Very simple user query...

Pedro Sam wrote: > I'm familiar with razor-report, for example - but it is a real pain to > mess about with this command line tool when all my mail is managed > remotely over IMAP I haven't been using spamassassin for a while, but last I check, "spamassassin -r" will report spam to DCC/pyzor/ra

Re: Very simple user query...

1546 This, I guess, might indicate part of the reason why less spam is caught today... On further investigation I found pyzor crashed when run... un-merging then re-merging it solved the problem which was probably some strange python dependency. Steve

Re: Very simple user query...

lder into which I drop spam that my mail server should report on my behalf -then reporting would become far less of a chore. Steve

Re: Very simple user query...

Martin Hepworth wrote: Well if this worked. we could make sure we hit the spammers really hard ;-) While I see eliminating spammers as being one of the better justifications for environmental warfare, it isn't sufficiently reliable to get my vote. of course those unfortunates wh

Re: Very simple user query...

Martin Hepworth wrote: Steve OK looks like these are both uk.geocities.com abuse spam. If you look at the archive you'll find some extra rulesets for these little blighters (and their variants). Genius answer! For some reason it had completely escaped my notice that all of the

Re: Very simple user query...

Martin Hepworth wrote: Steve Ok looks good. If you can drop an example of a spam that 'gets through' to a web page somewhere, I can run it over my system and see what happens. I've got loads of extra rules (most of rulesemporium.com etc etc so we'll see what hits... I s

Re: Very simple user query...

Martin Hepworth wrote: Steve OK - what do you get for "spamassassin -D --lint" ?? Output attached: sdlint.txt... This will give you the list of tests etc its triggering along with things that might be causing ptoblems. The URI-RBLs are enabled by default in most config

Very simple user query...

asy way to report spam explicitly to the checksum services (Razor/Pyzor/DCC)? Any other suggestions are welcome... Steve

SA Logging problem

SA and I can't get the system to fail, I can shut spamd down and restart and it keeps logging. The Debug on the two are the same. Please help! Steve

Subject Rewrite - Added charectors

Folks, We have in the SA conf: subject_tag [SPAM] We are running SA 2.63 Since today, we haven't had a problem with the rewrite, and today a message came in as: [SPAM-P] ...I'm confused... of where the -P came from. Has anyone seen this before? Or know why? Thanks, Steve

Re: Does this uridnsbl debug output indicate problems?

t 12:15 AM, jdow wrote: You added ClamAV plugin? {^_^} - Original Message ----- From: "Steve Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SA seems unusually slow today and I'm trying to figure out if I've done something to my configuration that is causing the problem or if it i

Does this uridnsbl debug output indicate problems?

s [8121] dbg: dns: timeout for sorbs after 20 seconds -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescreen Movie Centerhttp://www.widemovies.com/ Letterboxed Movie TV Schedule http://www.widemovies.com/lbx.html

Re: spurious __alarm__ messages in spamd log

Interesting. The last case of it my log the mail was flagged with both DCC and Pyzor so the "alarm" must not have been fatal if it was in those modules. I'll poke around a little more myself. On Aug 20, 2005, at 9:14 AM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: -Original Message--

spurious __alarm__ messages in spamd log

n 13.7 seconds, 2360 bytes. Anyone know how one might track these down (what debug areas to start with)? I've seen 2 in the last 30 hours or so. Rerunning the same message through with spamc gives the same score, but no __alarm__ messages. SA 3.1rc1 -- S

Re: Ham not auto-learning?

refore scoring ~ -100) be autolearned? My bayes thresholds are set for 12.1 (spam) and -12.0(ham). -- Matthew Yette Senior Engineer - NOC/Operations MA Polce Consulting, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 315-838-1644 (w) 315-356-0597 (f) AIM/Yahoo: MAPolceNOC MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Steve Martin

How long should a bayes_expire take?

eem to be a bug if multiple spamd clients are trying to do bayes_expire simultaneously. -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescreen Movie Centerhttp://www.widemovies.com/

Another spf HELO checking mystery

seems that is the case. Is it doing the right thing? SA 3.1pre1 -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescreen Movie Centerhttp://www.widemovies.com/ Letterboxed Movie TV Schedule

Re: First 3.1 observation

That was it. I had for some reason has removed the R flag in the postfix filter that was sending the mail to spamc. That of course broke spf's ability to do lookups on Return-Path. On Aug 16, 2005, at 9:29 AM, Steve Martin wrote: Running spamd with --debug=spf I'm getting some

Re: First 3.1 observation

w what may be causing that? Something in how postfix passes the message to spamc? On Aug 16, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Steve Martin wrote: I still have something strange going on that I can't figure out. When your mail came this morning, it did NOT have SPF_PASS, but if I run things manuall

Re: First 3.1 observation

9 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: Well, that one failed and it wasn't the list-posted copy. That was my direct email. And the HELO *should* pass due to the inclusion of IP address. It looks like you've got a broken trust path and SA is checking the wrong Received: header. Is your mail

bayes expiration problems?

expire and why did that happen on the second pass -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescreen Movie Centerhttp://www.widemovies.com/ Letterboxed Movie TV Schedule http://www.widemovies.com/lbx.html

Re: First 3.1 observation

cores than before. Seems like we should have a way to disable SPF tests for mailing lists since SPF is known not to work for them. -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescree

Re: First 3.1 observation

. They still aren't marked as spam, but with higher scores than before. Seems like we should have a way to disable SPF tests for mailing lists since SPF is known not to work for them. -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http:/

Re: First 3.1 observation

ill aren't marked as spam, but with higher scores than before. Seems like we should have a way to disable SPF tests for mailing lists since SPF is known not to work for them. -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.

Re: First 3.1 observation

ED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: First 3.1 observation References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

First 3.1 observation

spam, but with higher scores than before. Seems like we should have a way to disable SPF tests for mailing lists since SPF is known not to work for them. -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/

Re: 3.1 and Net::Ident

OK, I'll forget identd... Sometimes it is hard for me to resist trying things like that "because they are there". On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:33 PM, John Rudd wrote: On Aug 13, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Steve Martin wrote: 2) Does anyone know a good working identd this is a contrad

Re: 3.1 and Net::Ident

My mistake. I wasn't looking to closely just saw the list of things it said weren't installed. I guess it isn't a big deal, but now that I've started down the path of trying to get it working ... On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Michael Parker wrote: Steve Martin w

3.1 and Net::Ident

after the connection closes which makes me think is just a "fake" identd. 1) Is Net::Ident really required? 2) Does anyone know a good working identd for MacOS 10.4? Anytyhing wrong with forcing the install despite the test failure? -- Steve Martin http://

Re: Weird spam bounce back

urs with a 550 explaining they've got an infected local user. This way the messages double-bounce and ends up in their postmaster box. -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescre

Weird spam bounce back

oundary="=_NextPart_000_0003_AFA03F19.4131F551" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter- greylist-1.5.6 (mailhub.intercaf.ru [83.102.221.67]); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:22:36 +0400 (MSD) --j7BGMat1040225.1123777356/mailhub.inte

Re: What the hell is that?

ess. On Aug 10, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: http://{%LOGWITHID:{%ROTF:E:\EveryDayDomain\all01.txt%}?{%RND:^ %}={%ROT F:E:\EveryDayDomain\CompanyTest\pharrotates.txt%}%} -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.

Selectively disabling bayes autolearning

geocities by now ;-) I guess I could feed this mailing lists messages back into sa-learn -- forget, but I'd like something automatic. -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescreen Movie C

Re: SPF implementation

t; There is nothing more agreeable in life than to make peace with the establishment -- and nothing more corrupting. - Alan John Percivale Taylor -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http://www.smartcalibration.com/ The Widescreen M

RE: sa-stats.pl generates a zero report

Thanks Matt, looks like there's a few to choose from - I'll put aside some time to check them out. - steve -Original Message- From: Matt Linzbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 6 August 2005 1:28 a.m. To: Subject: RE: sa-stats.pl generates a zero report >

RE: sa-stats

Did this ever get figured out? I'm running into the same problem, and not matter what options I try I always come back with zeros. Debug shows it's processing the log file. Thanks, Steve > -Original Message- > From: Ben Hanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wedne

Checking for PTR?

Title: Checking for PTR? There's a rule NO_DNS_FOR_FROM which checks for an A or MX record for the sending IP, but no similar rule checking for PTR (reverse DNS) entries - and it's not clear to me why not. Anyone able to enlighten me?  - steve PS: I'm aware that these c

RE: sa-stats.pl generates a zero report

rsion? - steve -Original Message- From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 5 August 2005 12:37 p.m. To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: sa-stats.pl generates a zero report Fascinating. Somebody else must have made it sane. {^_^} - Original Message - From: &

Re: generating rule stats from spamd logs

   1    BAYES_00                         4079    14.05   66.75  622.75    1.83    2    HTML_MESSAGE                     3393    11.68   55.52  518.02    9.09    3    NO_REAL_NAME                     1053     3.63   17.23  160.76    1.06    4    HTML_80_90          

Re: spamd blank lines after syslog entries

That is my best guess at this point. On Jul 27, 2005, at 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Steve Martin wrote on Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:31:07 -0500: (MacOS X 10.4.2). could it be something specific to the Mac or this Syslog version on this OS X version? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany

Re: spamd blank lines after syslog entries

newline if the text already ends in a newline. If that is awkward, filter off any terminal newline in the text before logging, and the logging code will put one back on. Loren -- Steve Martin http://www.cheezmo.com/ Smart Calibration, LLC http

spamd blank lines after syslog entries

I was curious why spamd log entries always had an extra blank line after them. It looks like Sys::Syslog always does that so any perl script reporting to syslog via that mechanism has extra blank lines. (MacOS X 10.4.2). Anyone know why or if there is a way to change that behavior? -- Steve

Re: rpm installation and dependencies

works with my distro, great! Otherwise... -- JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638) "Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"

Re: all_spam_to

Thanks,  this should do the trick. Steve on 06/17/05 12:37 Fred wrote the following: One possible work around to this would be create a meta rule that fires when more than one person is listed in To or CC boxes. Using this meta rule, create another meta rule to counter the effects of

Re: all_spam_to

Well i'm thinking about removing the all_spam_to, and having the website that people are redirected to be a form for them to send me a message, and analyze their email. But it would be nice if sa would check each recipient when an all_spam_to user is detected... Steve on 06/17/05

all_spam_to

. I am running sa version 3.0.2. Is there a way to prevent this? Per recipient scanning when an all_spam_to is found? Thanks, Steve

Re: Learning from spam - system-wide

On Tuesday 31 May 2005 05:24, jdow wrote: > Trish and Steve may have quite different concepts of "spam". Many of > the complaints about Bayes being ineffective seem to come from people > trying to use one master Bayes database. Ah! I'll confess that it hadn'

Re: Learning from spam - system-wide

On Monday 30 May 2005 19:25, mouss wrote: > run SA from amavisd, and run sa-learn with the same uid as amavisd. Okay, ignore my previous message. I'm working on getting amavisd to run SA. Currently, amavisd seems to be running as user 'vscan' (UID 65). How do I run sa-learn as this user and wher

Learning from spam - system-wide

a 'new spam' folder. Now things are a little different. Scoop is just a server and we have three workstations all receiving mail (and spam!). What I'm having trouble understanding is this: when SA learns from new messages, are the benefits of this learning applied system-wide? Eg,

Re: Do we need a "Joe job" bounce message blacklist?

nced to me from lots of others and that much Mr Wiggly isn't good for anyone... Steve

Do we need a "Joe job" bounce message blacklist?

THEIR users from spam they don't care what it's doing to the rest of us. I'm wondering if a blacklist of known domains which send out stupid bounce messages or confirm emails would provide some incentive for cleaning them up. Any thoughts? Steve

RE: Logfile analyzer

There is also errdang brain can't remember sastats? Shows all your basic stats. Sorry I can't remember the name, I threw it into a script and only remember the script name. sa-stats.pl in the source for SA, under the tools directory.

Re: Detect size of bitmap

. 12137 Medellín, Ant. CO. > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:06 AM > Subject: Detect size of bitmap > > > >I keep getting emails that are sent in html and have a bmp that

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >