Howdy,
The time of year for Google Summer of Code has already arrived and once
again the Apache Software Foundation is taking part.
We are currently looking for students who wish to work on SpamAssassin
related projects over the summer.
You have until *March 24th* to sign up and submit an
implementation.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Google-Summer-of-Code-2007-...-tf3240085.html#a9146893
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
C. Bensend wrote:
Perhaps this is trivial, or not desired by anyone else but myself,
but I'd _love_ to be able to strip SpamAssassin tags via spamc and
spamd, instead of having to fire up the full-blown spamassassin
for each message. :)
formail ?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
DAve writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number
Matthew Wilson writes:
- Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support
In my experience, perl threading is just not avialable in a reliable,
fast implementation -- this is not viable I'm afraid :(
- Full, tested, supportable support for an asynchronous I/O model (a la
qpsmtpd-async)
A pretty
Mark Martinec writes:
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
Here's another one, to seize the opportunity when internal changes
are being contemplated:
Split the process
Mark Martinec writes:
On Saturday February 17 2007 03:01, Quinn Comendant wrote:
How about an extensive statistics reporting tool, ..., that
can show how well a current spamassassin installation is performing
and where it needs improvements.
Well, not exactly by your words, but in the same
Doc Schneider writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have
Raul Dias writes:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:35 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up
Perhaps this is trivial, or not desired by anyone else but myself,
but I'd _love_ to be able to strip SpamAssassin tags via spamc and
spamd, instead of having to fire up the full-blown spamassassin
for each message. :)
formail ?
That would work in most cases, yes. Unfortunately, not in
Julian Field writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
DAve writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on,
and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start
thinking
about things we'd like to put
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:35 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects
actually I think this is already implemented in 3.2.0 -- see
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4636 for details.
--j.
Raul Dias writes:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:35 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer
Justin Mason wrote:
DAve writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible
Justin Mason wrote:
DAve writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still
) normalize_charset option is set to 1.
-Raul Dias
--j.
Raul Dias writes:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:35 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on,
and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good
that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going
on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start
thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use
again
May I ask...
Whis is this thread named as such.
Does Google help fund SA efforts in one or multiple ways?
If so, may I ask how or directions to already posted docs on it?
- rh
--
Robert - Abba Communications
Computer Internet Services
(509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net
R Lists06 wrote:
May I ask...
Whis is this thread named as such.
Does Google help fund SA efforts in one or multiple ways?
If so, may I ask how or directions to already posted docs on it?
If you, uh, Google for Google Summer of Code I'm sure you'll find all
you want to know.
Daryl
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:27 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Raul Dias writes:
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 15:29 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
actually I think this is already implemented in 3.2.0 -- see
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4636 for details.
Nice. This patch
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, R Lists06 wrote:
May I ask...
Whis is this thread named as such.
Does Google help fund SA efforts in one or multiple ways?
If so, may I ask how or directions to already posted docs on it?
- rh
--
Robert - Abba Communications
Yes, if you Goole for Google Summer
Raul Dias writes:
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:27 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Raul Dias writes:
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 15:29 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
actually I think this is already implemented in 3.2.0 -- see
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4636 for details.
Yes, if you Goole for Google Summer of Code+spamassassin
you'll get a bunch of relevant hits. ;)
For example, check out:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SummerOfCode2006
Thank you
I was hoping for meaningful and relevant info from someone of authority and
in the know from the SA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
If I look at the tools and scripts I built around SA (and which
Graham Murray writes:
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't SA have at least 3 of those already? Razor, DCC, and Pyzor.
Not quite. Those show how many times *others* have seen it, not how
many times *I* have seen it. Also, these have hysteresis so if you are
unfortunately to
Justin Mason wrote:
Graham Murray writes:
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't SA have at least 3 of those already? Razor, DCC, and Pyzor.
Not quite. Those show how many times *others* have seen it, not how
many times *I* have seen it. Also, these have hysteresis
Raul Dias writes:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 02:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
fully
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 11:21 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Raul Dias writes:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 02:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in
Raul Dias writes:
**snip
If I remember correctly spamd was using something between 2 to 5% of
memory reported by top (45 process max).
If it was really shared, it would have not collapsed.
My bet is that the model used on Linux is copy on write. So after a
fork, when the child spamd
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Quinn Comendant wrote:
How about an extensive statistics reporting tool, possible
web-based, that can show how well a current spamassassin
installation is performing and where it needs improvements. It could
provide trends in different classes of spam and how each is
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 06:56:28PM -0500, Tim B. wrote:
How about a How many times have I seen this message body plugin...
So each time SA see's the same or similar enough message body, it
increases the score.
Doesn't SA have at least 3 of those already? Razor, DCC, and Pyzor.
--
On Saturday February 17 2007 03:01, Quinn Comendant wrote:
How about an extensive statistics reporting tool, ..., that
can show how well a current spamassassin installation is performing
and where it needs improvements.
Well, not exactly by your words, but in the same spirit,
this time
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't SA have at least 3 of those already? Razor, DCC, and Pyzor.
Not quite. Those show how many times *others* have seen it, not how
many times *I* have seen it. Also, these have hysteresis so if you are
unfortunately to be at the start of the spam
Not quite. Those show how many times *others* have seen it, not how
many times *I* have seen it. Also, these have hysteresis so if you are
unfortunately to be at the start of the spam run and receive multiple
mails all with the same body then Razor, DCC and Pyzor might not
help. Though if
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last year that we could
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
Perhaps this is trivial, or not desired by anyone else but myself,
but I'd _love_ to be able to strip SpamAssassin tags via spamc
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
I believe this was once mentioned on a Justin's blog (but can't find
a ref now), the following sounds promising as an additional
Mark Martinec writes:
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
I believe this was once mentioned on a Justin's blog (but can't find
a ref now), the following sounds
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:35, Justin Mason wrote:
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use
again.
Anything else that we'd like people to code up?
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good
ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to
Justin Mason writes:
Also, a related project would be to complete the pluginization of our
Bayes engine and APIs, so that other probabilistic classifiers can be
plugged in in place of, or in addition to, Bayes in SpamAssassin.
Right. I felt a need for something like this when I was switching
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
I believe this was once mentioned on a Justin's blog (but can't find
a ref now), the following sounds promising as an additional classifier
to existing bayes (especially since the author comes from the same
organization as myself :)
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:31:13AM -0800, Dan wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:35, Justin Mason wrote:
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use again.
Anything else that we'd like people to code up?
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
On 2/16/07, Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3785
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Also, a related project would be to complete the pluginization of
our Bayes engine and APIs, so that other probabilistic
classifiers can be plugged in in place of, or in addition to,
Bayes in SpamAssassin.
+1
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Also, a related project would be to complete the pluginization of
our Bayes engine and APIs, so that other probabilistic
classifiers can be plugged in in place of, or in addition to,
Bayes in SpamAssassin.
+1
If that's a
- Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support
- Full, tested, supportable support for an asynchronous I/O model (a la
qpsmtpd-async)
- Pluggable to the point where all configuration and settings can be pulled
from anywhere (databases, files, in-memory cache) at runtime, so SA could
stay
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:35 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
Here's another one, to seize the opportunity when internal changes
are being contemplated:
Split the process into two parts:
-
Matthew Wilson wrote:
- Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support
- Full, tested, supportable support for an asynchronous I/O model
(a la qpsmtpd-async)
I think effort could be better spent elsewhere.
Spam checking lands itself ideally to running parallel individual
processes, with
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 6:09 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code 2007 ...
Matthew Wilson wrote:
- Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support
- Full, tested
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
fully utilize today's CPU I/O, and it's probably no big deal
to provide about 2 GB of memory
Mark Martinec writes:
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
fully utilize today's CPU I/O, and it's probably no big deal
to
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:35:39 +, Justin Mason wrote:
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use again.
Anything else that we'd like people to code up?
How about an extensive statistics reporting tool, possible web-based, that can
show how well a current spamassassin
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 02:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
fully utilize today's CPU I/O,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:01:37 -0800, Quinn Comendant wrote:
And/or a fix for the qmail+simscan per-user preferences spamc -u
issue where if an email is addressed to multiple users or an alias
spamc isn't passed the correct user.
Sorry to reply to myself, but I want to retract that last
58 matches
Mail list logo
