Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 21.01.21 11:10, Steve Charmer wrote: on this documentation page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UpgradingVersion "If you install using a Linux package installer: Debian unstable: apt-get install spamassassin " what is the meaning of "unstable" ? it's a debian

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Bob Proulx
Bill Cole wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Only if you have upgraded to an Ubuntu nightly or installing a > > backport would you get 3.4.5. > > Also required: a time machine. > > 3.4.5 is not yet released. There have been substantial fixes made to the 3.4 > branch since the last pre-release

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Bill Cole
On 21 Jan 2021, at 17:05, Bob Proulx wrote: Only if you have upgraded to an Ubuntu nightly or installing a backport would you get 3.4.5. Also required: a time machine. 3.4.5 is not yet released. There have been substantial fixes made to the 3.4 branch since the last pre-release snapshot

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Bob Proulx
Steve Charmer wrote: > SA was originally installed using apt-get (Ubuntu-16) I recommend upgrading from Ubuntu 16 to 18.04 and letting it upgrade spamassassin as part of that upgrade. Then upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 and again let it upgrade spamassassin along with everything else. Tha

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Bob Proulx
ly I read that you are running Ubuntu. Therefore I recommend simply upgrading to the latest Ubuntu LTS and letting it upgrade to the latest spamassassin packaged for it. You mentioned Ubuntu 16.04 so upgrade first to 18.04 and get everything working then continue the upgrade to 20.04 afterwar

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
d, so it has its own database. So if anyone can assist with more advice on "exactly" what to backup and how to run an "upgrade", please chime in. Thank you. Assuming that the packagers of SA for your platform have done their job properly, upgrading the package with apt-get sh

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Bill Cole
ds to maintain an index of what packages are installed, so it has its own database. So if anyone can assist with more advice on "exactly" what to backup and how to run an "upgrade", please chime in. Thank you. Assuming that the packagers of SA for your platform have done th

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Steve Charmer
on this documentation page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UpgradingVersion "If you install using a Linux package installer: Debian unstable: apt-get install spamassassin " what is the meaning of "unstable" ? it sounds scary, like the package should not be run in live

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-21 Thread Steve Charmer
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your message. I thought an upgrade fixes bugs. Maybe you are thinking about an update, which seems like it would updates rules in *.samples? I would "like" to backup everything, for safety, that is why I included a list of the directories (fodlers) which I

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-20 Thread RW
sin I've not used Ubuntu or apt-get, but usually package managers have some kind of upgrade command. Unless there's a good reason not to, I'd update everything IIWY. When upgrading SA to a different version you need to run sa-update to populate the new rules directory and optionally run sa-comp

Re: Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-20 Thread Steve Charmer
are these the important folders which need to be backed up? PREFIX=/usr, DEF_RULES_DIR=/usr/share/spamassassin, LOCAL_RULES_DIR=/etc/spamassassin, LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/lib/spamassassin and... /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004002 does that match to SA version 3.4.2 ? I see 3.00... and think, NO that

Upgrading from 3.4.2 to 3.4.5, how to

2021-01-19 Thread Steve Charmer
Hi, I am running version 3.4.2 /usr/bin/spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 running on Perl version 5.22.1 spamd --version SpamAssassin Server version 3.4.2 running on Perl 5.22.1 with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 2.024) with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.068) which spamd

Re: Some notes on upgrading from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 on CentOS 7

2018-10-22 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 7:43 PM > > To: Alex Woick; users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Cc: spam-ger...@zmi.at > > Subject: Re: Some notes on upgrading from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 on CentOS 7 > > > > On 9/19/2018 11:06

Re: Some notes on upgrading from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 on CentOS 7

2018-09-19 Thread Daniele Duca
On 19/09/2018 19:42, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: auto-whitelist: sql-based get_addr_entry ign...@compiling.spamassassin.taint.org|none: SQL error: Unknown column 'last_hit' in 'order clause' I got the same error when drop-upgraded 3.4.1 to 3.4.2. In my case it was a conflict between txrep and

Re: Some notes on upgrading from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 on CentOS 7

2018-09-19 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 9/19/2018 11:06 AM, Alex Woick wrote: > I'd like to report some things I noticed while updating from SA 3.4.1 > to SA 3.4.2 on CentOS 7. No serious problems, but I'd like to mention > if someone also tries to update on CentOS 7. Great info, thanks. > - upon starting spamd, I got this message in

Some notes on upgrading from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2 on CentOS 7

2018-09-19 Thread Alex Woick
I'd like to report some things I noticed while updating from SA 3.4.1 to SA 3.4.2 on CentOS 7. No serious problems, but I'd like to mention if someone also tries to update on CentOS 7. I created the 3.4.2 rpm by downloading the latest Fedora Core 3.4.1 src rpm. Then I did: - remove all

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-16 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, RW wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:56:30 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: That's odd, because is *does* appear in 72_scores.cf. The default-to-1-point behavior is if there is no score defined in the config files... It's not in mine. Ahhh, it disappeared overnight. It was

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 6/16/2017 1:56 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote: On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Gerald Turner wrote: score HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 Yes I think something is wrong, here the 'HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS' rule gets scored

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-16 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:56:30 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > That's odd, because is *does* appear in 72_scores.cf. The > default-to-1-point behavior is if there is no score defined in the > config files... It's not in mine.

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-16 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote: On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Gerald Turner wrote: score HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 Yes I think something is wrong, here the 'HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS' rule gets scored at 1 since the 8th. That doesn't sound

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-16 Thread Merijn van den Kroonenberg
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Gerald Turner wrote: > >> spamd[32137]: rules: meta test FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN has >> dependency 'HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS' with a zero score >> [snip] >> - Is there a bug with the project's sa-update channel / auto- >>mass-check setup? > > That's what it

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-15 Thread Gerald Turner
On Thu, Jun 15 2017, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Gerald Turner wrote: >> spamd[32137]: rules: meta test FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN has dependency >> 'HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS' with a zero score >> spamd[31552]: rules: meta test __FORM_FRAUD_3 has dependency 'LOTTO_AGENT' >>

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-15 Thread Gerald Turner
On Thu, Jun 15 2017, David Jones wrote: > On 06/15/2017 06:42 PM, Gerald Turner wrote: >> What could be the cause? >> >>- Cruft left behind by old SA versions >> (e.g. /etc/spamassassin/v310.pre, /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001, >> etc.)? > > Make sure you remove all old rule dirs

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-15 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Gerald Turner wrote: spamd[32137]: rules: meta test FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN has dependency 'HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS' with a zero score spamd[31552]: rules: meta test __FORM_FRAUD_3 has dependency 'LOTTO_AGENT' with a zero score spamd[31552]: rules: meta test

Re: Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-15 Thread David Jones
eakage with FuzzyOCR¹, however there's been an enormous increase in syslog messages that I've been combating, and I cannot find the root cause. Upon upgrading to SA 3.4.1, each email scanned is emitting the following message to syslog: spamd[32137]: rules: meta test FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMD

Errors since upgrading to 3.4.1: "meta test ... with a zero score"

2017-06-15 Thread Gerald Turner
s increase in syslog messages that I've been combating, and I cannot find the root cause. Upon upgrading to SA 3.4.1, each email scanned is emitting the following message to syslog: spamd[32137]: rules: meta test FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN has dependency 'HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS' with

Upgrading to SA 3.4.0 on Ubuntu Precise (12.04)

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Schaap
Hi, On my server, I'm running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 as provided as a package on Ubuntu Precise (12.04 LTS). I'd like to upgrade to SpamAssassin 3.4.0, but there is no upgrade available for Precise (12.04). I could upgrade to Ubuntu Trusty (14.04), but I'm afraid to... Alternatively, I could

RE: Upgrading to SA 3.4.0 on Ubuntu Precise (12.04)

2014-08-25 Thread Kevin Miller
, Fax: (907) 586-4500 Registered Linux User No: 307357 -Original Message- From: Michael Schaap [mailto:spamassas...@mscha.org] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 12:23 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Upgrading to SA 3.4.0 on Ubuntu Precise (12.04) Hi, On my server, I'm running

Re: sa-compile fails after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-21 Thread Jari Fredriksson
21.10.2012 03:10, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti: On 10/20/2012 5:01 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Sa-compile says: # /usr/bin/sa-compile Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while... Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: extracting from rules of

sa-compile fails after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-20 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Sa-compile says: # /usr/bin/sa-compile Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while... Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: extracting from rules of type body_0 100%

Re: sa-compile fails after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-20 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/20/2012 5:01 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Sa-compile says: # /usr/bin/sa-compile Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while... Oct 20 23:59:32.992 [6734] info: generic: extracting from rules of type body_0 100%

Re: Performance Problems Upgrading From 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 on CentOS 5/6

2011-11-18 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:16 +, Tom wrote: Here's the stats from my cluster at the moment (8am) (these figures wll ramp up considerably!) (apologies if the html doesn't end up translating well!) Server Load Avg Processed/Min Busy Child Proc Proc Time 10.44.219.192 0.34 42 1 0.31

Re: Performance Problems Upgrading From 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 on CentOS 5/6

2011-11-18 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 19:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:16 +, Tom wrote: (apologies if the html doesn't end up translating well!) Damn, sorry. My attempt at pruning the large tables seriously fucked up the formatting. :/ output from top, after running

Performance Problems Upgrading From 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 on CentOS 5/6

2011-11-17 Thread Tom
Greetings, === Information == Old Version: spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 New EL5 Version: spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el6.x86_64 New EL6 Version: spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5.x86_64 SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -L -i 10.44.219.208 -A 10.44.217.0/20 -m 40 -q -x -u spamd --min-children=40 Other info Bayes

Re: Performance Problems Upgrading From 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 on CentOS 5/6

2011-11-17 Thread Martin Hepworth
have you turned off RBLs and other network tests you dont need and disabled any non-standard rules and plugins? if you are using RBLS's have a a caching nameserver on the SA machine itself (even if your 'local' DNS server is only a couple of milliseconds away a caching namesserver on the box

Re: Performance Problems Upgrading From 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 on CentOS 5/6

2011-11-17 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:55 +, Tom wrote: SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -L -i 10.44.219.208 -A 10.44.217.0/20 -m 40 -q -x -u spamd --min-children=40 Do you really run a single spamd server, serving a /20 of potential SMTP servers? Also, you configured spamd to try hard and always keep exactly 40

Re: New log errors on upgrading

2010-04-15 Thread Micah Anderson
Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si writes: More new errors that I am getting from an upgrade to spamassassin 3.3: 3.3.0 ? Good question... indeed the version is 3.3.0. Use of uninitialized value $start_time in addition (+) at /usr/sbin/spamd line 1382, GEN2073 That was fixed in 3.3.1

New log errors on upgrading

2010-04-12 Thread Micah Anderson
More new errors that I am getting from an upgrade to spamassassin 3.3: Use of uninitialized value $start_time in addition (+) at /usr/sbin/spamd line 1382, GEN2073 and also the following: spf: lookup failed: Can't locate object method new_from_string via package Mail::SPF::Mech::All at

Re: New log errors on upgrading

2010-04-12 Thread Mark Martinec
Micah, More new errors that I am getting from an upgrade to spamassassin 3.3: 3.3.0 ? Use of uninitialized value $start_time in addition (+) at /usr/sbin/spamd line 1382, GEN2073 That was fixed in 3.3.1 . and also the following: spf: lookup failed: Can't locate object method

RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-18 Thread Kaleb Hosie
: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3 On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kaleb Hosie wrote: I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for now. I ran into a bit of an issue with the NetAddr::IP module. I've installed it but when I try to install the built RPM file it gives me this error

RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-18 Thread Kaleb Hosie
] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:42 PM To: Kaleb Hosie Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3 On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kaleb Hosie wrote: I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for now. I ran into a bit of an issue with the NetAddr

Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-17 Thread Kaleb Hosie
Hello, I'm running SA 3.2.5 on CentOS 5.4 and I've noticed that a newer major release has been released. The server is currently in production so I'm a bit leery to upgrade. Do you feel that it is worth the upgrade to 3.3? Is there anything I should know before I go ahead and upgrade? Thanks

RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-17 Thread Randal, Phil
and destroy all copies of it. -Original Message- From: Kaleb Hosie [mailto:kho...@spectraaluminum.com] Sent: 17 March 2010 15:36 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3 Hello, I'm running SA 3.2.5 on CentOS 5.4 and I've noticed that a newer major release has

Re: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-17 Thread Dennis B. Hopp
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:35 -0400, Kaleb Hosie wrote: Hello, I'm running SA 3.2.5 on CentOS 5.4 and I've noticed that a newer major release has been released. The server is currently in production so I'm a bit leery to upgrade. Do you feel that it is worth the upgrade to 3.3? Is there

RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-17 Thread Kaleb Hosie
-Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:46 AM To: Kaleb Hosie; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3 3.3.0 works fine on CentOS 5.4, but 3.3.1 is due out imminently (in the next week or two), so

RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-17 Thread Randal, Phil
[mailto:kho...@spectraaluminum.com] Sent: 17 March 2010 16:26 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3 I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for now. I ran into a bit of an issue with the NetAddr::IP module. I've installed it but when I try

RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3

2010-03-17 Thread R P Herrold
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kaleb Hosie wrote: I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for now. I ran into a bit of an issue with the NetAddr::IP module. I've installed it but when I try to install the built RPM file it gives me this error: error: Failed dependencies:

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-11 Thread Jeff Mincy
From: Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 21:13:24 -0500   sa-learn --dump magic gives:       0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version       0.000          0      57538          0  non-token data: nspam       0.000          0

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-11 Thread Alex
Hi, Thanks for the information on bayes and sa-learn. Very helpful. Best, Alex   I suppose you could take the ntokens value before, and subtract it   from the after value to see how many tokens were expired, right? It   would be interesting to see how many tokens are expired on a regular  

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-11 Thread RW
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:54:20 -0500 Jeff Mincy j...@delphioutpost.com wrote: You have an exclusive lock when doing expiration. Expiration presumably takes longer on larger volumes, but it is still pretty fast. Running expiration daily or weekly should be more than sufficient. AFAIK the

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Jan-2010, at 07:07, Cecil Westerhof wrote: LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes: I think he (she?) He. Cecilia and Cecile are female, but Cecil is male. Think about Cecil B. DeMill. I thought I was referring to Kai, which can go either way. I know Cecil is a male name. -- Wally:

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: It's the number of seconds since the epoch (Jan 1, 1970). One easy way to convert it to a readable time is # perl -e 'print scalar localtime 1263044805, \n' Sat Jan 9 08:46:45 2010 % date -r 1263044805 Sat Jan 9 06:46:45 MST 2010

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread Bill Landry
LuKreme wrote: On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: It's the number of seconds since the epoch (Jan 1, 1970). One easy way to convert it to a readable time is # perl -e 'print scalar localtime 1263044805, \n' Sat Jan 9 08:46:45 2010 Or even simpler: perl -le 'print

RE: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
-Original Message- From: Bill Landry [mailto:b...@inetmsg.com] Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 12:42 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: About upgrading LuKreme wrote: On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: It's the number of seconds since

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-10 Thread Bill Landry
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: -Original Message- From: Bill Landry [mailto:b...@inetmsg.com] Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 12:42 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: About upgrading LuKreme wrote: On 9-Jan-2010, at 21:23, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: It's the number

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com writes: There's always a document about updating from the various old versions, read it and you will be prepared for most problems. But your SA is *really* old, expect some minor config problems. On 06.01.10 02:57, Cecil Westerhof wrote: I did the

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:31:26 +0100: you have changed WHAT??? He means he uses procmail and used to send all spam to /dev/null. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Jan-2010, at 04:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com writes: I only changed /dev/null to a real mailbox, you have changed WHAT??? I think he (she?) meant that the local delivery for certain spam-thresholds was set to /dev/null and that's been changed

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com writes: you have changed WHAT??? He means he uses procmail and used to send all spam to /dev/null. That is right. I also made the following script: #!/usr/bin/env bash # When --no-filename is not an accepted parameter for grep use -h # When

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl writes: I did the upgrade. It took some time and there was a slight problem with permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed /dev/null to a real mailbox, because of the 2010 problem. When something like this happens again I now can

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Cecil Westerhof
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes: I think he (she?) He. Cecilia and Cecile are female, but Cecil is male. Think about Cecil B. DeMill. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Jeff Mincy
From: Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:39:59 +0100 Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl writes: I did the upgrade. It took some time and there was a slight problem with permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed /dev/null

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Jeff Mincy j...@delphioutpost.com writes: I upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5. I have the feeling that sa-learn takes more time with 3.2.5 as it took with 3.0.4. Can this be true? It is not a problem, because it is done by cron-tab, but I am just curious. You can use spamc -L

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Jeff Mincy
From: Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:24:56 +0100 Jeff Mincy j...@delphioutpost.com writes: I upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5. I have the feeling that sa-learn takes more time with 3.2.5 as it took with 3.0.4. Can this be true?

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread RW
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:24:56 +0100 Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl wrote: Jeff Mincy j...@delphioutpost.com writes: I upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5. I have the feeling that sa-learn takes more time with 3.2.5 as it took with 3.0.4. Can this be true? It is not a problem,

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Alex
Hi,   sa-learn --dump magic gives:       0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version       0.000          0      57538          0  non-token data: nspam       0.000          0      74876          0  non-token data: nham       0.000          0     166338          

RE: About upgrading

2010-01-09 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
--Original Message- From: Alex [mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 9:13 PM To: SA Mailing list Subject: Re: About upgrading Hi,   sa-learn --dump magic gives:       0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version       0.000

About upgrading

2010-01-05 Thread Cecil Westerhof
After the scare about the 2010 problem, it was found that there was no problem, but that was because an old version of SpamAssassin was used (3.0.4). The web-site says it is not a big problem to upgrade to the latest version. But in how far is this really the case? Are there surprises to be aware

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
with 3.0.* Yes, it is worth upgrading. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. REALITY.SYS corrupted. Press any key to reboot Universe.

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-05 Thread Kai Schaetzl
There's always a document about updating from the various old versions, read it and you will be prepared for most problems. But your SA is *really* old, expect some minor config problems. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-05 Thread David Bayle
Kai Schaetzl wrote: There's always a document about updating from the various old versions, read it and you will be prepared for most problems. But your SA is *really* old, expect some minor config problems. Kai Hy, Thanks for your advice but I have already read the UPGRADE file. We are

Re: About upgrading

2010-01-05 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com writes: There's always a document about updating from the various old versions, read it and you will be prepared for most problems. But your SA is *really* old, expect some minor config problems. I did the upgrade. It took some time and there was a

Upgrading bayes DB

2009-08-04 Thread MySQL Student
Hi, I'm still working on my bayes training project, but also trying to upgrade the bayes DB due to upgrading perl and all the associated modules. I started with this output from sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0

Upgrading perl modules for SA

2009-07-30 Thread MySQL Student
Hi, I recently upgraded perl from 5.6.0 to perl-5.10.0, along with all the modules necessary for sa-3.2.5 and amavisd-new (an old version still). I'm now having a problem that I really don't understand: Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) TROUBLE in check_mail:

Re: Upgrading perl modules for SA

2009-07-30 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, MySQL Student wrote: Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) TROUBLE in check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility (/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line 4019. Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175)

Re: Upgrading perl modules for SA

2009-07-30 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 14:36 -0400, Alex wrote: I recently upgraded perl from 5.6.0 to perl-5.10.0, along with all the modules necessary for sa-3.2.5 and amavisd-new (an old version still). I'm now having a problem that I really don't understand: Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]:

Re: Upgrading perl modules for SA

2009-07-30 Thread MySQL Student
Hi, check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility (/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line How's this a SA question? Yes, my apologies. I don't know enough about amavis yet, and thought it may be related to all the modules I upgraded, and not amavis

Re: Upgrading

2008-09-17 Thread Sergey Kovalev
Jack Raats пишет: Hi Grant, First update the ports (see the handbook how (cvsup-without-gui and portupgrade)) After this you'll run portupgrade -a It seems to me that using `portupgrade -a` is not very good. You should consult /usr/ports/UPDATING and look if there are special instructions

Re: Upgrading

2008-09-17 Thread Michael Scheidell
Hi all, What would the reccomended procedure be for upgrading SA from 3.001008 to 3.002003 and then staying up to date. This would be on FreeBSD 6.n, with the original SA installed from ports. TIA, -Grant Sorry, just saw this. Should be easy, a portupgrade -R p5-Mail-SpamAssassin

Re: Upgrading

2008-09-16 Thread Jack Raats
: Upgrading Hi all, What would the reccomended procedure be for upgrading SA from 3.001008 to 3.002003 and then staying up to date. This would be on FreeBSD 6.n, with the original SA installed from ports. TIA, -Grant

Upgrading

2008-09-15 Thread Grant Peel
Hi all, What would the reccomended procedure be for upgrading SA from 3.001008 to 3.002003 and then staying up to date. This would be on FreeBSD 6.n, with the original SA installed from ports. TIA, -Grant

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-21 Thread hiram
be procmail too, of course). I think that is a better solution too, because I have no need to send outgoing email to SA. If postfix calls SA via master.cf all mail, including outgoing will be scanned. Best regards, jarif -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Upgrading

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-17 Thread Jari Fredriksson
it - be prepared. The best way might be to replicate the situation/scenario in a Virtual environment, and attempt upgrading in there first, to see what might go wrong, and how you can avoid problems on your live server. VMWare is great for this, for me. You might find some other Virtualization

RE: Upgrading

2008-04-15 Thread hiram
Michael Hutchinson-3 wrote: Hello Hiram, It's not scary, you have to step up and own it - be prepared. The best way might be to replicate the situation/scenario in a Virtual environment, and attempt upgrading in there first, to see what might go wrong, and how you can avoid problems

RE: Upgrading

2008-04-14 Thread hiram
Hi Mike, That sounds on the limit to scarry. I will rethink it before upgrading then. Thanks for the advice and the information! Best regards, /Hiram Michael Hutchinson-3 wrote: -Original Message- Sir, You or someone else, has managed to break apt-get's info about S.A. Im

RE: Upgrading

2008-04-14 Thread Michael Hutchinson
Hello Hiram, It's not scary, you have to step up and own it - be prepared. The best way might be to replicate the situation/scenario in a Virtual environment, and attempt upgrading in there first, to see what might go wrong, and how you can avoid problems on your live server. VMWare is great

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-13 Thread hiram
this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Upgrading-tp16630332p16670491.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Upgrading

2008-04-13 Thread Michael Hutchinson
-Original Message- From: hiram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 April 2008 4:32 p.m. To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgrading Hi again! Sorry, that's what my wife means when she says: you hear but you don't listen :-((. Thanks for the answers. Still, I

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-12 Thread hiram
#ICQ 277289867 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Upgrading-tp16630332p16647533.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-12 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Hi Jim! Yep, that's exactly what I meant, I change to directory /etc/init.d/ and from the root shell prompt # I write: spamassassin restart But it seems that it wants to process the file restart, instead of understanding the option restart. Thanks for your answer, /Hiram Linux

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-12 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 09:49, hiram wrote: Hi Jim! Yep, that's exactly what I meant, I change to directory /etc/init.d/ and from the root shell prompt # I write: spamassassin restart But it seems that it wants to process the file restart, instead of understanding the option restart. You

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-12 Thread Dave Funk
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hiram wrote: /Hiram, If you are going to administer a Unix system you need to know the basics of paths and shells. If you look -CLOSELY- at what Jim wrote you will see that it is not the same as what you did. You did: spamassassin restart Jim said: ./spamassassin

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-12 Thread Grant Peel
- Original Message - From: Dave Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hiram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 1:39 PM Subject: Re: Upgrading On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hiram wrote: /Hiram, If you are going to administer a Unix system you need to know

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-12 Thread SM
At 13:59 12-04-2008, Grant Peel wrote: so up to this point, I have been cpoying the contents of /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/updates_spamassassin_org to /usr/local/share/spamassassin Based on what you guys are telling me, I bet there is some configuration knob somewhere (to forgo the

Upgrading

2008-04-11 Thread hiram
Hi! I'm currently using spam assassin 3.0.3 in a debian-sarge distribution. I'm trying to upgrade from 3.0.3 to 3.2.4. Following the upgrading method described in the wiki I type: # apt-get install spamassassin but I get: spamassassin is already the newest version What am I doing wrong? Do I

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-11 Thread hiram
assassin, any help will be very appreciated! Thanks beforehand, /Hiram -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Upgrading-tp16630332p16630930.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Upgrading

2008-04-11 Thread Jim Knuth
Am 12.04.2008 0:41 Uhr, schrieb hiram: Hi! It's Hiram again. I've updated the local.cf file and I'm trying to restart spam assassin. I write: /etc/init.d/# spamassassin restart But I get: Unable to open restart: No such file or directory What can I do to restart it? I'm running it in

Re: upgrading is just like installing

2008-02-12 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 04:25 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KB User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing* KB special about SA version numbers. Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file [...] Then stick to the user_prefs file. You do realize there is a

RE: upgrading is just like installing

2008-02-12 Thread James E. Pratt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:26 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: upgrading is just like installing KB User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing* KB special about SA

Re: upgrading is just like installing

2008-02-12 Thread jidanni
KB User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing* KB special about SA version numbers. Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file or instructions for installing non-root. And SA version numbers aliases often need explaining, just like Debian package version

  1   2   3   >