Re: REMOVE

On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, da...@grmcompany.com wrote: Dan: The SA users mailing list is self-managed. list-unsubscribe: -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org p

REMOVE

REMOVE

From: Paul Fowler Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 4:59 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Regex error in most recent update Hi, looks like it is activley been worked on here. https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7956 Regards, Paul _ From: Bren

RE: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

On Sat, 11 Jul 2020, Marc Roos wrote: I don't see a problem since blacklist/whitelist are terms the computer industry just grabbed from hotel reservation desks or some place like that. It's not going to stop their use by the general public of course. I think you can go a bit further, like 100

Re: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

"As programmers, our day to day work doesn’t typically present us with opportunities to take a stand against racism. Situations like this are opportunities to be the change we want to see. When you get that opportunity and you don’t act, or even worse, you defend the status quo." That quote wa

Re: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:24 PM Mark London wrote: > > The proposed name changes were proposed for many years in the software > community. For example in 2014, Drupal opted to use "primary/replica" > instead, and Django followed suit the same year with > "leader/follower".In 2018, there app

RE: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

> I don't see a problem since blacklist/whitelist are terms the computer industry > just grabbed from hotel reservation desks or some place like that. It's not > going to stop their use by the general public of course. I think you can go a bit further, like 1000 BC in chinese culture yin y

RE: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - (reason: 553 5.1.8 ... Domain of sender address x...@f1-outsourcing.eu does not exist) I think netfence.it is not really doing a good job ;)

RE: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

>On 2020-07-11 00:32, Mark London wrote: >> Spamassassin is not alone. > >Quote: >"If a lot of people believe in something stupid, it just doesn't stop being stupid". But in a democracy you will have a problem with this.

Re: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

On 2020-07-11 00:32, Mark London wrote: Spamassassin is not alone. Quote: "If a lot of people believe in something stupid, it just doesn't stop being stupid".

Re: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

Mark London writes: > Spamassassin is not alone. And that is how dictatorships and injustices are created: blindly following, because a lot of others do. Hitler, Mussolini and Franco where the worst. Luckily we also had the saviours, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Softwa

Re: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

I don't see a problem since blacklist/whitelist are terms the computer industry just grabbed from hotel reservation desks or some place like that. It's not going to stop their use by the general public of course. As for master/slave those were picked up by mechanical designers and borrowed fo

Re: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

dumb-f-ks-julian-assange-reminds-us-what-mark-zuckerberg-thinks-facebook-users -Original Message- To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave. Spamassassin is not alone. https://www.google.c

RE: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

2018-03-25/dumb-f-ks-julian-assange-reminds-us-what-mark-zuckerberg-thinks-facebook-users -Original Message- To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave. Spamassassin is not alone. https:/

Linux, Twitter, Mysql, Github, etc, all plan to remove blacklist and whitelist, master and slave.

Spamassassin is not alone. https://www.google.com/search?q=whitelist+blacklist&rlz=1C1CHBD_enUS893US893&sxsrf=ALeKk02i5oEeNFMyRbCSyvz1P74SAG8W8A:1594419806351&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiwobjR3MPqAhVUknIEHbzFCdwQ_AUoAXoECA0QAw&biw=1008&bih=5900

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, RW wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:27:18 +0200 Jari Fredriksson wrote: John Hardin kirjoitti 24.10.2018 kello 18.10: As was suggested earlier, disable auto-expiry and run a cron job to expire Bayes tokens. I seem to have auto expiry on, but have not seen any problems

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:27:18 +0200 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > John Hardin kirjoitti 24.10.2018 kello 18.10: > > As was suggested earlier, disable auto-expiry and run a cron job to > > expire Bayes tokens. > > > I seem to have auto expiry on, but have not seen any problems with it. Expiry wi

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

> John Hardin kirjoitti 24.10.2018 kello 18.10: > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: > >> Hello.!! >> >> I have a problem with the `/.spamassassin/bayes.lock` >> >> This is the error I'm seeing : >> >> Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18073]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases >>

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: Hi.!! the permits of the directory are correct: ll -d /.spamassassin/ drwxrwxr-x 2 nobody nobody 63 oct 29 08:54 /.spamassassin/ The parameter bayes_auto_learn is set to "0". The advice was for auto *expire*. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

Hi.!! the permits of the directory are correct: ll -d /.spamassassin/ drwxrwxr-x 2 nobody nobody 63 oct 29 08:54 /.spamassassin/ The parameter bayes_auto_learn is set to "0". any ideas? Regards, Emanuel.

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

Have you check permissions on './spamassassin'? I had semiliar issue in the past! Thanks, Motty On 10/24/18 8:10 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: Hello.!! I have a problem with the `/.spamassassin/bayes.lock` This is the error I'm seeing :    Oct 23 15:

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: Hello.!! I have a problem with the `/.spamassassin/bayes.lock` This is the error I'm seeing : Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18073]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Oct 23 15:12:14 server

spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

Hello.!! I have a problem with the `/.spamassassin/bayes.lock` This is the error I'm seeing : Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18073]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18157]: bayes: cannot open bayes databas

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, RW wrote: On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:16:51 + Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: Hello, I have a problem with the /.spamassassin/bayes.lock I see this error: Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18073]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists

Re: spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:16:51 + Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with the /.spamassassin/bayes.lock > > I see this error: > > Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18073]: bayes: cannot open bayes > databases /.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Oct 23 > 15:12:14

spamd fails to remove bayes.lock file

Hello, I have a problem with the /.spamassassin/bayes.lock I see this error: Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18073]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Oct 23 15:12:14 server spamd[18157]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /.spamassassin/bayes

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:20:56 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> >> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: > >> >> >> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the > >> >> >> Junk folder to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, > > >> >You can work around the plu

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

>> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: >> >> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk >> >> folder to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, >You can work around the plugin's deficiencies by using autotraining >or doing some additional training, but then the

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:41:51 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: > >> >> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk > >> >> folder to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, > > >You can work around the plugin's defic

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: >> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk >> folder to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, I think this is what the dovecot's Antispam plugin does: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Antispam and maybe ImapSieve: http

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:13:04 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: > On 18 Jun 2018, at 08:47, RW wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 > > @lbutlr wrote: > > > >> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk > >> folder to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, > > > > > > Whethe

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

am going to do is enable report_safe 1 and remove the subject tagging and see how that goes.

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On 18 Jun 2018, at 08:47, RW wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 > @lbutlr wrote: > >> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk folder >> to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, > > > Whether this is the Dovecot plugin or something local it's a poor way > of tr

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:44:15 +0100 Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 14:26 +0100, RW wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:11:16 +0100 > > Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > > > > > I normally use an awk script for this sort of job because they are > > > short, easy to write and run fast

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: > I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk folder > to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, Whether this is the Dovecot plugin or something local it's a poor way of training Bayes. You're training on SA errors not Bayes e

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 14:26 +0100, RW wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:11:16 +0100 > Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > > I normally use an awk script for this sort of job because they are > > short, easy to write and run fast. > > There's no point in the OP doing this, since sa-learn ignores these

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:11:16 +0100 Martin Gregorie wrote: > I normally use an awk script for this sort of job because they are > short, easy to write and run fast. There's no point in the OP doing this, since sa-learn ignores these headers.

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 06:13 -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk folder > to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, but it doesn’t removed the > subject tagging (Spam: 05.5) nor does it remove the X-Spam-Flag > header. > > What

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:42:39 +0200 Tom Hendrikx wrote: want to see the result of Junk filtering in you MUA, > don't tag the subject, and do everything based on the SA headers. And X-Spam-* headers are ignored.

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

Hi, "Moving out of the Junk folder" definitely sounds like IMAP. In the IMAP standard, messages can't be changed after delivery. To alter the message (change subject, remove headers), you'll need to delete the old message, and create a new, altered message. This is bad for cac

Re: Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk folder to > pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, but it doesn’t removed the subject > tagging (Spam: 05.5) nor does it remove the X-Spam-Flag header. > > What would I need to do in the script to remove the SA tags on

Remove SA tagging when learning as ham

I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk folder to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham, but it doesn’t removed the subject tagging (Spam: 05.5) nor does it remove the X-Spam-Flag header. What would I need to do in the script to remove the SA tags on messages that are

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

I stand corrected! On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 13:22 RW wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:56:13 -0400 > Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > > It's pedantic but I am 99.9% sure that a Test Rule (prefix T_) is > > scored at 0.001 but scores in the report are rounded to a ceiling so > > it displaces as .01. > > > >

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:56:13 -0400 Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > It's pedantic but I am 99.9% sure that a Test Rule (prefix T_) is > scored at 0.001 but scores in the report are rounded to a ceiling so > it displaces as .01. > Informational rules that do score 0.001 display as 0.00 whereas T_* rules

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: It's also useless duplicate of __RP_MATCHES_RCVD header T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD eval:check_mailfrom_matches_rcvd() header __RP_MATCHES_RCVD eval:check_mailfrom_matches_rcvd() Cleaned that up. -- John Hardin KA7OHZh

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote: Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  this rule is allowing spammy emails past through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf? simply put: score RP_MATCHES_RCVD 0 score T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD 0 in case

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote: Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  this rule is allowing spammy emails past through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf? simply put: score RP_MATCHES_RCVD 0 score T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD 0 in case of anyone will try pushing any of these to SA. On 0

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

It's pedantic but I am 99.9% sure that a Test Rule (prefix T_) is scored at 0.001 but scores in the report are rounded to a ceiling so it displaces as .01. -- Kevin A. McGrail Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linked

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:23:50 -0700 (PDT) John Hardin wrote: > Actually, I retract that suggestion, I wasn't aware of the special > automatic scoring for T_ rules. Leave it alone. There's little point in this case, but I don't think there's any harm in changing such scores locally. IIRC the "T_"

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote: Thanks for your prompt reply John, X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7     tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,     T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no always the score i

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

Thanks Tom, my scores were definitely a problem. Thanks again, Motty On 04/05/2018 09:48 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: On 05-04-18 18:40, Motty Cruz wrote: Thanks for your prompt reply John, X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7     tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BA

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On 05-04-18 18:40, Motty Cruz wrote: > Thanks for your prompt reply John, > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7 >     tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, >     T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no > BAYES_00

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

Thanks for your prompt reply John, X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.27 tagged_above=-999.9 required=5.7     tests=[BAYES_50=4.3, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,     T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no always the score is -0.01 regardless; I will take your sug

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:12:45 -0700 Motty Cruz wrote: > Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  this rule is allowing spammy emails past > through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf? How's that happening? A T_* rule only scores +/- 0.01.

Re: how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Motty Cruz wrote: Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  this rule is allowing spammy emails past through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf? The best way to disable it without breaking any meta-rules that may be using it is to set its score to 0.001 in your local config file. I

how to remove T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD

Hello, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  this rule is allowing spammy emails past through. Is there a way to disable in local.cf? Thanks, Motty

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 07.10.2014 um 02:10 schrieb John Hardin: On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: P.S.: it was your "Re: [SPAM] Re: False positive in rule: FUZZY_XPILL" i refered implicitly as i started that thread - mayb eyou can make clear that the [SPAM] part was not your personal prefix for the SA list

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: P.S.: it was your "Re: [SPAM] Re: False positive in rule: FUZZY_XPILL" i refered implicitly as i started that thread - mayb eyou can make clear that the [SPAM] part was not your personal prefix for the SA list as LuKreme repeatly pretends instead just

Re: half-OT: please remove [spam]-markers from subjects

Am 07.10.2014 um 01:48 schrieb David Jones: On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote: On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote: Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SP

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 07.10.2014 um 01:38 schrieb John Hardin: On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote: On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote: Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM

Re: half-OT: please remove [spam]-markers from subjects

> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote: > > On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >> Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: > >>> [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me > >>> You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used >

Re: half-OT: please remove [spam]-markers from subjects

On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, LuKreme wrote: On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote: Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because of a content filte

Re: half-OT: please remove [spam]-markers from subjects

On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:42 , Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: >> [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me >> You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because >> of a content filter and not simply a tag to

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 04.10.2014 um 18:27 schrieb jdebert: My apologies. You are 100,000% correct about changing annoying behaviours. thank you very much! I did not find the message you referred to, perhaps because of a forgotten convenience filter that strips nuisance tags from subjects the intention was no

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

My apologies. You are 100,000% correct about changing annoying behaviours. I did not find the message you referred to, perhaps because of a forgotten convenience filter that strips nuisance tags from subjects.

Full OT: Re "trolls" (was Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects)

On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 19:47:00 +0200 Kai Schaetzl wrote: > FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling. > Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that. > > https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll > Whether or not Herr Reindl is a troll doesn't matter. There

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the list-folder :-) On 03.10.14 11:11, LuKreme wrote: You should not be filtering on Subject. Scoring on subject is fine

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

On 10/3/2014 1:47 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling. Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that. https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll As of yet, I've not seen anything that has stepped to that level and let's focus on

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 03.10.2014 um 19:47 schrieb Kai Schaetzl: > FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling. > Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that. > > https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll thank you for your intervention and support of the two guys which are unha

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

FYI, this person is banned from some lists for trolling. Might be worthwhile for list-admin to consider that. https://www.google.de/search?hl=de&as_q=Harald+Reindl+troll Kai

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: > [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me > You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because > of a content filter and not simply a tag to identify the name of the list it is the *default* tag f

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

> On 03 Oct 2014, at 11:21 , Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 03.10.2014 um 19:11 schrieb LuKreme: >>> On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:19 , Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl H

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 03.10.2014 um 19:11 schrieb LuKreme: >> On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:19 , Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

> On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:19 , Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before >>> reply - they lead ofte

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

no contact you better fucking not reply >> >>> On 10/1/14, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert: >>>>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200 >>>>> Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Oh dear. Please could you keep your arguments and name-calling off-list? It's not nice seeing people being so unpleasant. Thanks! Anthony -- www.fonant.com - Quality web sites Tel. 01903 867 810 Fonant Ltd is registered in England and Wales, company No. 7006596 Registered office: Amelia Hous

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

On 10/3/14 10:46 AM, "Nick Edwards" wrote: >On 10/3/14, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 03.10.2014 um 12:56 schrieb Nick Edwards: May I suggest the two of you either settle this with a machete fight (offlist!) or by being the bigger person and *not responding* to each other, including passive-agr

Re: [SA-Users] Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Would it be possible for both of you to knock off this juvenile pissing contest on a public mailing list? Please? John -- I for one welcome our new computer overlords. -- Ken Jennings a former "Jeopardy!" quiz show champion, writing on his

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200 >>>> Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>>>>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> please remove marke

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>>>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before >>>>>> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead t

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

debert: >> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200 >> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> >>>>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage w

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 30.09.2014 um 18:12 schrieb jdebert: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200 > Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >>> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> please remove markers like [SPAM]

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:19:10 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: > > On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before > >> reply - they lead often

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/29/2014 11:19 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: >> On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged >>> b

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

Am 29.09.2014 um 19:14 schrieb Nels Lindquist: > On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before >> reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the >> list-folder :-) > > Please tea

Re: half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/29/2014 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before > reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the > list-folder :-) Please teach your users to filter on th

half-OT: please remove spam-markers from subjects

please remove markers like [SPAM] if a mesage was flagged before reply - they lead often that a message goes to junk- instead the list-folder :-) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: remove

On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 23:14 -0500, Steve Bergman wrote: > On 07/03/2014 11:05 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Care to elaborate on this? > > All I really have to "elaborate upon" is my typo. "that" instead of "than". That actually was bugging me every single time I re-read that sentence. ;)

Re: remove

On 07/03/2014 11:05 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 22:49 -0500, Steve Bergman wrote: Care to elaborate on this? All I really have to "elaborate upon" is my typo. "that" instead of "than". Irrespective of whether English is or is not your native language, you are notab

Re: remove

On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 22:49 -0500, Steve Bergman wrote: > On 07/03/2014 09:58 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > > Steve, may I ask why you are interested in this? > > I was interested in just how a list of this nature ends up getting > administered, relative to other OSS lists. And I think you'

Re: remove

On 07/03/2014 09:58 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Steve, may I ask why you are interested in this? I was interested in just how a list of this nature ends up getting administered, relative to other OSS lists. And I think you've answered my question more thoroughly that you might have inte

Re: remove

On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 21:02 -0500, Steve Bergman wrote: > Is the originator of this thread still receiving unsolicited bulk email > from this list? Steve, may I ask why you are interested in this? As a SA PMC member and list moderator, I do know the answer to that question, or rather can query t

Re: remove

On 2014-07-03 17:54, Philip Prindeville wrote: Which reminds me: is there a ‘reflector’ address anyone can mail to which will verify their SPF and DKIM records? Or… no, I guess such a beast would be susceptible to reflector attacks from spoofed addresses… so it’s a dumb question. Unless it c

Re: remove

Is the originator of this thread still receiving unsolicited bulk email from this list?

Re: remove

On Jul 3, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 15:32 -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote: >> cute.. >> >> his is the mail system at host relay.mailchannels.net. >> >> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not >> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's

Re: remove

On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 15:32 -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote: > cute.. > > his is the mail system at host relay.mailchannels.net. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > Remote-MTA: dns; mx1.us.apache.org > Diagnosti

Re: remove

On 2014-07-03 11:51, Brent Kennedy wrote: remove Try list-unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org> instead? -- Dave Warren http://www.hireahit.com/ http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren

Re: remove

On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 14:51 -0400, Brent Kennedy wrote: > remove Self service. To unsubscribe, send a mail to the appropriate address below, NOT the list. From the headers of every single list post: list-help: <mailto:users-h...@spamassassin.apache.org> list-unsubscribe: <

remove

remove

Re: Remove spam results from mail header

processed twice. Usual SA practice is to remove (or overwrite) previously existing SA headers when processing a message. However this, again, is dependent upon how SA is hooked into your mail system. Bottom line, you've got an unusual SA kit there, time to do some code diving. From: xxx To: xxx T

  1   2   3   >