Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Kalle Korhonen
Tapestry is officially very, very fast: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319. We of course knew that already but I hope the author updates the graph. Kalle On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Massimo Lusetti mluse...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue,

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Nicolas Barrera
sweet figures! cheers Nicolás.- On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: Tapestry is officially very, very fast: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319 . We of course knew that already but I

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: Tapestry is officially very, very fast: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319. We of course knew that already but I hope the author updates the graph. Nice!

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Kalle Korhonen
... and the graph's updated: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/. Check the concurrent users vs response time - Tapestry is beating JSP as well :) Might be worth mentioning at tapestry.apache.org. I'll update the test app to use T5.3 once an alpha version is out. Kalle

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-08 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: I really didn't want to say anything definitive about since I didn't run it on a dedicated, clean test bed or anything. I just run the benchmark for some time on my development machine, mostly comparing against

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: Pull request sent: https://github.com/jtdev/blogpost_files/pull/4 Kalle Great Kalle! ... Eager to see results! Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Igor Drobiazko
by the comparison. It would be nice to see how Tapestry performs. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote: No, but Tapestry's got to make it to these comparisons to stay as a contender. Has anybody tried contacting the author? If not, I'll see what I

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Josh Canfield
Pull request sent: https://github.com/jtdev/blogpost_files/pull/4 Did you run the other tests and do your own comparison? On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: Kalle On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Kalle Korhonen
joshcanfi...@gmail.com wrote: Pull request sent: https://github.com/jtdev/blogpost_files/pull/4 Did you run the other tests and do your own comparison? On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote: Kalle On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kalle Korhonen

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Hi Kalle, what is the status? Did you have a chance to provide an app to be covered by the comparison. It would be nice to see how Tapestry performs. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote: No, but Tapestry's got to make it to these comparisons to stay

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kalle Korhonen
to be covered by the comparison. It would be nice to see how Tapestry performs. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote: No, but Tapestry's got to make it to these comparisons to stay as a contender. Has anybody tried contacting the author

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kalle Korhonen
. Kalle On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Igor Drobiazko igor.drobia...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kalle, what is the status? Did you have a chance to provide an app to be covered by the comparison. It would be nice to see how Tapestry performs. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Kalle Korhonen

[OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-05-31 Thread Borut Bolčina
Hello, just wanted to share this link http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/ -borut

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-05-31 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Borut Bolčina borut.bolc...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, just wanted to share this link http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/ A quick search of tapestry doesn't reveal anything... Am I missing something? Cheers -- Massimo

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-05-31 Thread Kalle Korhonen
No, but Tapestry's got to make it to these comparisons to stay as a contender. Has anybody tried contacting the author? If not, I'll see what I can do. Kalle On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Massimo Lusetti mluse...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Borut Bolčina

Re: [ANN] Jazoon 2010 Talk (JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison)

2010-04-01 Thread Igor Drobiazko
. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison. More information about the presentation can be found at my blog [2]: [1] http://jazoon.com [2] http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/03/30/jazoon-2010-talk-javaserver-faces-2-0-vs-tapestry-5/ I hope to see some Tapestry folks

Re: [ANN] Jazoon 2010 Talk (JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison)

2010-03-31 Thread Christian Riedel
- yourself! Way to go Igor. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 23:05, Igor Drobiazko igor.drobia...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, in June I'll be speaking at Jazoon 2010 [1] in Zurich, Switzerland. I'll be presenting a 50 minutes talk JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison

[ANN] Jazoon 2010 Talk (JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison)

2010-03-30 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Hi folks, in June I'll be speaking at Jazoon 2010 [1] in Zurich, Switzerland. I'll be presenting a 50 minutes talk JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison. More information about the presentation can be found at my blog [2]: [1] http://jazoon.com [2] http://blog.tapestry5

Re: [ANN] Jazoon 2010 Talk (JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison)

2010-03-30 Thread Andreas Andreou
Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison. More information about the presentation can be found at my blog [2]: [1] http://jazoon.com [2] http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/03/30/jazoon-2010-talk-javaserver-faces-2-0-vs-tapestry-5/ I hope to see some Tapestry folks

Re: [ANN] Jazoon 2010 Talk (JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison)

2010-03-30 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
be presenting a 50 minutes talk JavaServer Faces 2.0 vs. Tapestry 5: A Head-to-Head Comparison. More information about the presentation can be found at my blog [2]: [1] http://jazoon.com [2] http://blog.tapestry5.de/index.php/2010/03/30/jazoon-2010-talk-javaserver-faces-2-0-vs-tapestry-5/ I

JavaLobby Web Framework Comparison

2009-01-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
JavaLobby is looking to create a comprehensive web framework comparison. http://java.dzone.com/articles/javalobby-web-frameworks-compa I'm hoping one or more people from the Tapestry community can step forward and help out! -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind

Re: JavaLobby Web Framework Comparison

2009-01-19 Thread nille hammer
Hi Howard, if none of your co-committers can spare time, I will be happy to jump in for T5. Cheers, nillehammer - original Nachricht Betreff: JavaLobby Web Framework Comparison Gesendet: Mo, 19. Jan 2009 Von: Howard Lewis Shiphls...@gmail.com JavaLobby is looking to create

T5 Dynamic Component Ids and a comparison to JSP EL

2008-12-09 Thread joestelmach
! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5-Dynamic-Component-Ids-and-a-comparison-to-JSP-EL-tp20916741p20916741.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

AW: AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Kersten
Tapestry And GWT (Google Web Toolkit) Tapestry and GWT may be compared but it's a kind of different breed. Integrating GWT in Tapestry works well and is a kind of quick use. Well, so it worths to say that, explaining why they are different breed, and that they may work together.

Re: AW: AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-20 Thread Francois Armand
Martin Kersten wrote: [... a lot of usefull comments...] Thank you for all these in insight, your post was very interesting. Do you want to complete the wiki here : http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/FrameworkComparisons ? I can do it for you if you wish, but it will be almost a copy/paste of

AW: AW: AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Kersten
if you compare yourself with others you know ;-) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Francois Armand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. März 2008 10:57 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: AW: AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison Martin Kersten wrote: [... a lot

T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Daniel Jue
I've made the stub page, and I've tried to keep it marketing-free and of course honest. Smart project managers are going to ask when you _would not_ want to use a particular framework, and potential users should be able to get that kind of information from us easily. Those of you with experience

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Adam Zimowski
A little feedback: When not to use Tapestry If you are not allowed to use Maven. (Currently used by T5 for gathering library dependencies, although not specifically required) This is simply not true. It is possible to use Tap 5 without Maven at all. In fact, I'm running a major intranet

AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
. März 2008 16:43 An: Tapestry users Betreff: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison I've made the stub page, and I've tried to keep it marketing-free and of course honest. Smart project managers are going to ask when you _would not_ want to use a particular framework, and potential users should

AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
/ Comparison I've made the stub page, and I've tried to keep it marketing-free and of course honest. Smart project managers are going to ask when you _would not_ want to use a particular framework, and potential users should be able to get that kind of information from us easily. Those of you

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Daniel Jue
Thanks for the input, I will change that item. I should have been more careful in my wording. What I meant by used and not specifically required is that many T5 tutorials use Maven to get you started (archetypes, screencasts, articles, appfuse), but that you are not required to use Maven at all.

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 16:43 An: Tapestry users Betreff: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison I've made the stub page, and I've tried to keep it marketing-free and of course honest. Smart project managers are going to ask when you _would not_

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 16:43 An: Tapestry users Betreff: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison I've made the stub page, and I've tried to keep it marketing-free and of course honest. Smart project managers are going to ask when you _would not_ want

Re: AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Francois Armand
Martin Kersten wrote: Tapestry And GWT (Google Web Toolkit) Tapestry and GWT may be compared but it's a kind of different breed. Integrating GWT in Tapestry works well and is a kind of quick use. Well, so it worths to say that, explaining why they are different breed, and that they

Re: Comparison

2007-09-29 Thread kranga
Subject: Re: Comparison An ASO is an application state object. ASOs are created on demand, and shared between pages. ASOs are generally stored in the HttpSession. A client ASO would be all that, but would be stored on the client (inside hidden form fields or query parameters). This has some costs

Re: Comparison

2007-09-28 Thread Borut Bolčina
yes :-) I have great concern for pages source size, but I guess I will have to get my hands dirty and try GWT to see the results. Unfortunately time is luxury. Would anyone of you guys use GWT to build portal like pageflakes or netvibes? What technology stack do you see most appropriate? I was

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Christian Gorbach
Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong: http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html cheers c)hristian Borut Bolčina-2 wrote: Hello, has anyone done a fair comparison of T5, JSF (any incarnation), Wicket or/and any other Java web framework

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Francois Armand
Christian Gorbach wrote: Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong: http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html cheers c)hristian (I'm sorry, I would have answer on your blog, but it seems that something does not work with typekey login, I get

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Renat Zubairov
Great post indeed, it explains allot! Thanks! On 27/09/2007, Christian Gorbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong: http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html cheers c)hristian Borut Bolčina-2 wrote: Hello

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Borut Bolčina
PROTECTED]: Borut Bolčina wrote: Hello, has anyone done a fair comparison of T5, JSF (any incarnation), Wicket or/and any other Java web framework. I Well, realy broad question. You should find some ideas here : http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/choosing_a_jvm_web_framework1 and all

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Does that qualify as damning with faint praise? On 9/27/07, Christian Gorbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong: http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html cheers c)hristian Borut Bolčina-2 wrote: Hello

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread kranga
into panels within a single page. - Original Message - From: Borut Bolčina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:29 AM Subject: Re: Comparison Thanks for your input Francois. Nobody has mentioned GWT so far. Is it an enterprise

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread kranga
and hence am forced to use the session. - Original Message - From: Francois Armand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:24 AM Subject: Re: Comparison Christian Gorbach wrote: Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
: Francois Armand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:24 AM Subject: Re: Comparison Christian Gorbach wrote: Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong: http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Anton Gavazuk
in forms persisted through the redirect and hence am forced to use the session. - Original Message - From: Francois Armand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:24 AM Subject: Re: Comparison Christian Gorbach

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:24 AM Subject: Re: Comparison Christian Gorbach wrote: Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong: http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html cheers c)hristian

Re: Comparison

2007-09-27 Thread Anton Gavazuk
- From: Francois Armand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:24 AM Subject: Re: Comparison Christian Gorbach wrote: Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong: http

Comparison

2007-09-25 Thread Borut Bolčina
Hello, has anyone done a fair comparison of T5, JSF (any incarnation), Wicket or/and any other Java web framework. I have WebObjects background and some T4 demo apps. I read Neil Ford's Art Of Java Web Development a book a while ago, but it is outdated now. Still, it has guidelines for web

RE: Comparison

2007-09-25 Thread Kolesnikov, Alexander GNI
September 2007 14:53 To: Tapestry Subject: Comparison Hello, has anyone done a fair comparison of T5, JSF (any incarnation), Wicket or/and any other Java web framework. I have WebObjects background and some T4 demo apps. I read Neil Ford's Art Of Java Web Development a book a while ago

Re: Comparison

2007-09-25 Thread Francois Armand
Borut Bolčina wrote: Hello, has anyone done a fair comparison of T5, JSF (any incarnation), Wicket or/and any other Java web framework. I Well, realy broad question. You should find some ideas here : http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/choosing_a_jvm_web_framework1 and all around the web

Re: Comparison

2007-09-25 Thread Christian Gruber
of inconveniences found in the WebObjects/Wotonomy stack. Christian On 25-Sep-07, at 12:16 PM, Francois Armand wrote: Borut Bolčina wrote: Hello, has anyone done a fair comparison of T5, JSF (any incarnation), Wicket or/and any other Java web framework. I Well, realy broad question. You should find

Re: ZK comparison

2006-06-26 Thread Nick Westgate
And a dash of GPL or commercial licensing ... http://zk1.sourceforge.net/buy/pricing.html Cheers, Nick. Peter Svensson wrote: Hmm. It looks a little bit like tapestry, when I look at example 3 in the wiki. Maybe like tapestry 4.1 + tacos and bits of trails. Cheers, PS On 6/23/06, hv @

Re: ZK comparison

2006-06-24 Thread Peter Svensson
Hmm. It looks a little bit like tapestry, when I look at example 3 in the wiki. Maybe like tapestry 4.1 + tacos and bits of trails. Cheers, PS On 6/23/06, hv @ Fashion Content [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone checked out ZK (http://zk1.sourceforge.net/) and compared it with Tapestry ?

ZK comparison

2006-06-23 Thread hv @ Fashion Content
Has anyone checked out ZK (http://zk1.sourceforge.net/) and compared it with Tapestry ? Henrik - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]