A released product needs to achieve 'true' stability in the code base,
especially with regards to internals, I imagine that keeping tapestry as
an Alpha/Beta allows more flexibility to modify the internals without
causing waves in the community. I always have had the feeing that
production
.
Is
this still realistic ? If not can you please provide a
realistic date
?
Petros
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
---
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Howard M. Lewis
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
of T5 is fall 2007.
Is
this still realistic ? If not can you please provide a realistic date ?
Petros
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:35:15 -0200, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Unfortunately, I'm going to only be working on Tapestry part time until
Q1, when I finally (keep fingers crossed) will be working on Tapestry
at least part of the time on salaried, not personal, time.
? If not can you please provide a realistic date
?
Petros
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
, October 18, 2007 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
I'm not sure where incompatible releases comes in. No one releases
1.0 - 2.0 compatible releases except O/S vendors. That's typically
what the large version number change means - these are incompatible.
That's not a strike against Tapestry
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:15:03 -0300, Peter Stavrinides
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but Tapestry will die a quick death, no matter how good it is under the
hood, if you slap devotees in the face again and again.
Howard has stated very clearly that there will be no Tapestry 6 or, at
least,
Message -
From: Christian Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
Egregious? That demands and answer and perhaps an apology.
Firstly, try porting and app from Weblogic Portal 8 to Weblogic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
Ok, whatever. I give in. I'll go and use T4 and whine at Howard now.
Oh wait, no I won't. I'll work on T5 and try to encourage it into as
re-usable
I am apparently a bit touchy this week, Kranga, et al. Please
forgive. I also wasn't stating that lack of compatibility was an
industry norm. I was saying, merely, that often (and demonstrably) a
major version number implies a lack of complete backwards
compatibility. That was all.
On 10/23/07, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me repeat ... I have seven years of experience (in Tapestry) on how NOT
to be backwards compatible. T5 is all about ensuring future backwards
compatibility without compromising the ability to enhance the framework
going forward.
I
.
- Original Message -
From: Christian Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
I'm not sure where incompatible releases comes in. No one releases
1.0 - 2.0 compatible releases except O/S
, 2007 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
I'm not sure where incompatible releases comes in. No one
releases 1.0 - 2.0 compatible releases except O/S vendors.
That's typically what the large version number change means - these
are incompatible. That's not a strike against Tapestry
Nachricht-
Von: kranga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 13:00
An: Tapestry users
Betreff: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
That is an incredible statement! There have been numerous
discussions on
this mailing list on the way T4 was made completely
incompatible
The one question I could not answer without looking ridiculous was What
happens to our multi-million dollar project if Howard is hit by a bus
tomorrow
I think the question is irrelevant. The question you should be answering:
Is the current base usable enough to push through on the project?. A
Message -
From: Alex Shneyderman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
The one question I could not answer without looking ridiculous was What
happens to our multi-million dollar project
, 2007 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
The one question I could not answer without looking ridiculous was What
happens to our multi-million dollar project if Howard is hit by a bus
tomorrow
I think the question is irrelevant. The question you should be answering:
Is the current
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a13273520
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing
the competitive advantage is not
clear cut.
- Original Message - From: Alex Shneyderman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
The one question I could not answer without looking ridiculous
, October 18, 2007 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
The one question I could not answer without looking ridiculous
was What
happens to our multi-million dollar project if Howard is hit by a
bus
tomorrow
I think the question is irrelevant. The question you should be
answering
to
market even factoring in learning-curve has improved over JSF or
Struts 2.
Christian.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a13277462
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
What
happens to our multi-million dollar project if Howard is hit by a bus
tomorrow
Yes, please don't do that.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Tapestry is an one man show. ..
Actually, this is one advantage of Tapestry: guaranteed quality.
On 10/17/07, Daniel Jue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
happens to our multi-million dollar project if Howard is hit by a bus
tomorrow
Yes, please don't do that.
You seriously recommending a framework in a alpha status for a
multi-million dollar project ? Don't get me wrong,
i like tapestry and i'am using version 4.1 in 2 projects, but i would
never use alphas/betas framework without good documentation/books in
production.
michael
petros wrote:
I am
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
You seriously recommending a framework in a alpha status for a
multi-million dollar project ? Don't get me wrong,
i like tapestry and i'am using version 4.1 in 2 projects, but i would
never use alphas/betas framework without good documentation/books
2007. Is
this still realistic ? If not can you please provide a realistic date ?
Petros
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
2. Tapestry is an one man show. ..
Actually, this is one advantage of Tapestry: guaranteed quality.
On 10/17/07, Daniel Jue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
happens to our multi-million dollar project if Howard is hit by a bus
tomorrow
Yes, please don't do
-Original Message-
From: kranga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 5:29 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Tapestry 5 Roadmap
Actually, this is one advantage of Tapestry: guaranteed quality.
That flies in the face of the philosophy of open source
that the final release of T5 is fall 2007. Is
this still realistic ? If not can you please provide a realistic date ?
Petros
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
. Is
this still realistic ? If not can you please provide a realistic date ?
Petros
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
The tapestry 5 website says that the final release of T5 is fall 2007. Is
this still realistic ? If not can you please provide a realistic date ?
Petros
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-5-Roadmap-tf4439437.html#a12666499
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list
34 matches
Mail list logo
