in eclipse it's also possible to set file-associations. to figure out
how it actually works, you might want to ask in the (approriate)
eclipse mailinglist
rgds
gregor
Am 18.05.2009 um 08:27 schrieb Dola Woolfe :
Hi,
In a recent email, I asked how to make Eclipse treat html files and
j
> From: Arijit Sarkar Job Gmail [mailto:arijit.k.sar...@gmail.com]
> So If I have an web application deployed on tomcat and windows XP pro,
> theoretically, unlimited users can connect to the application
> simultaneously?
> Tomcat or Windows XP does not place any limits to that?
There are no limit
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: czeno2002 [mailto:czeno2...@yahoo.com]
>> Subject: Tomcat ReadTimout on Http post
>>
>> I'm experiencing a really ugly readtimout problem in the production
>> system started a couple of days ago. The main problem is that there
>> is no way to reproduce it
This time i have problem in maxwait. To test the maxwait i tried to
establish the connection and close.
My dbserver is located outside my system, so for dbconnection network is
required as per our Production server model.
So first i established the connection first from the jsp page, it gets done.
On Friday 15 May 2009 16:58:55 Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> > From: Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) [mailto:rainer.f...@inxmail.de]
> > Subject: Re: Change thread name of HTTP worker threads at Runtime
> >
> > I just read this up. It says "should ensure". How strong this is
> > sepends on whether this
Dola Woolfe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Within a .jsp document, is there a way of referring to a file in same
> directory?
>
> For example, new java.io.File(ThisDir, "FileName.txt").
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dola
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe,
Kapil Bansal wrote:
> Hi Pid,
> Thanks for the reply,the PDF is already being generated before it is passed
> to the servlet, in the Servlet they are just attaching a end user specif
> Watermark to the PDF .So when the end user tries to view the PDF ,he has to
> wait for the full file to download
means your session to TC is still live
suggest attenuate connectionTimeout in connector config in server.xml
in code you can always session.invalidate()
http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/2.2/javadoc/javax/servlet/http/HttpSession.html#invalidate()
Martin Gainty
I have not failed. I've just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
Last week, I decided to actually run my own performance measurements.
Before I waste a lot of time benchmarking, I wanted to vet my
methodology so I get all the data worth taking.
I'm using ApacheBench 2.3 (ships with httpd 2.2.10) as my benchma
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance
>
> I will be comparing an out-of-the-box prefork MPM httpd 2.2.10
> configuration against an out-of-the-box Tomcat 5.5.26 Coyote, APR, and
> APR without sendfile configur
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> 1. Is the number of requests (100, sufficient? It seems to take
>forever on this machine... my Coyote tests took longer than
>overnight.
You want enough tests that they're sensitive to statistically significant
differ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I've never built tcnative before, but I'm no stranger to the standard
UNIX source package build process. I'm having a bit of difficulty
building this.
I'm starting with the bin/tomcat-native.tar.gz that comes with Tomcat
5.5.26 which ends up bei
the apache httpd may cry foul because you are testing with a prefork config
instead of worker
assuming you can scare up another processor
is there a way to run the same httpd test suite with apache worker?
assuming the definition data_transfer_rate is accurate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/18/2009 10:33 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] 1.
>> Is the number of requests (100, sufficient? It seems to take
>> forever on this machine... my Coyote tests took longer th
some documentation:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mpm_common.html
MaxClients:
The MaxClients directive sets the limit on the number of simultaneous requests
that will be served.
Any connection attempts over the MaxClients limit will normally be queued, up
to a number based on the Listen
Hello,
by that logic, when you edit a file with Word, the default save
location should be the directory where the Word binary is located.
The "current directory" with servlet applications is rather weakly
defined - and for very strict adherence to servlet specification
you shouldn't even expect t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
On 5/18/2009 10:47 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> the apache httpd [crowd] may cry foul because you are testing with a
> prefork config instead of worker assuming you can scare up another
> processor
I'm happy to re-run the tests using a worker M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/18/2009 11:23 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Chuck,
Er, Peter. Sorry 'bout that.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkoRgJYACgkQ
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> I suppose I could gauge each test so it would take (roughly) a certain
> amount of time (say, 10 minutes). At least then I'd know how long the
> entire battery would take :)
I think that's probably a better approach.
> Okay. My o
I'm curious by your comment that Coyote/APR is performing on par with httpd,
from the results in your first message I saw it was a pretty big difference. Or
are you saying that wasn't using APR?
Also, I'd be curious about the big disparity between the 16MiB files and the
other 1MiB-32MiB files.
So what you are suggesting is my mod_jk and tomcat parameters in server.xml are
messed up ..
Here is my current setup I have one apache load balancing to 2 tomcat workers
Maxclients = 512
ThreadsPerChild = 256
Connection_pool_size = 256
Tomcat MaxThreads = 150
I will suggest my team to chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/18/2009 10:32 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance
>>
>> I will be comparing an out-of-the-box prefork MPM httpd
Christopher Schultz wrote:
> I've never built tcnative before, but I'm no stranger to the standard
> UNIX source package build process. I'm having a bit of difficulty
> building this.
...
> ...and this is where things fall apart for me. Here's the output of
> configure (apologies for any bad line
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 5/18/2009 11:37 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
>> I suppose I could gauge each test so it would take (roughly) a certain
>> > amount of time (say, 10 minutes). At least then I'd know how long the
>> > entire battery would take :)
>
> I think tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin,
On 5/18/2009 11:35 AM, Robin Wilson wrote:
> I'm curious by your comment that Coyote/APR is performing on par with
> httpd, from the results in your first message I saw it was a pretty
> big difference. Or are you saying that wasn't using APR?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 5/18/2009 3:19 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
>> From: Arijit Sarkar Job Gmail [mailto:arijit.k.sar...@gmail.com] So
>> If I have an web application deployed on tomcat and windows XP
>> pro, theoretically, unlimited users can connect to the appli
Peter Crowther wrote:
...
As a rough first cut, vmstat 5 and watch the numbers ;-). iostat too, if you
can. If CPU isn't pegged at 100% and the disk isn't at full capacity, that's
an interesting result as it implies the box has spare capacity and there's
contention elsewhere - often lock co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chetan,
On 5/18/2009 10:43 AM, Chetan Chheda wrote:
> Our network team is already engaged and looking into this. We had
> several instances of tomcats locking up today. I have attached one such
> thread dump here ..
It looks like all your request pro
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 5/18/2009 3:19 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Arijit Sarkar Job Gmail [mailto:arijit.k.sar...@gmail.com] So
If I have an web application deployed on tomcat and windows XP
pro, theoretically, unlimited users
Hi, our app currently relies on using the attribute
emptysessionpath=true on the ajp connector due to having most of our
urls not containing the context path of our web app. We are having
trouble with the jvmroute switching as the Tomcat code doesn't appear to
check if the jvmroute is valid for
On 18.05.2009 18:03, Juha Laiho wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> I've never built tcnative before, but I'm no stranger to the standard
>> UNIX source package build process. I'm having a bit of difficulty
>> building this.
> ...
>
>> ...and this is where things fall apart for me. Here's the o
Hi folks --
Short version: how to get Tomcat5 to run as a service under 64-bit Windows 2003?
Long version:
Okay, we've got Tomcat5 running from the command-line within 64-bit
Windows 2003 Enterprise (and cannot use tomcat 6/java 6 for our
project) -- and now we're working to get it running as a
dl/l tomcat-native-1.1.16-win32-src from
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi
Cannot open include file: 'apr.h': No such file or directory?
also i did'nt see makefile ?
Martin
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confide
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply.
>
> On 5/13/2009 5:28 PM, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> > My setup is tomcat 5.5.17 + mod_jk 1.2.15 + httpd 2.2.2. I am using
> > AJP1.3.
>
> Old versions of everything. Consider upgrading?
>
[Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Yes, sure - we will upgrade at some poin
HTTPd.conf :
Timeout 300
KeepAlive On
MaxKeepAliveRequests 100
KeepAliveTimeout 30
ThreadLimit 512
StartServers 100
MaxClients 512
MinSpareThreads 129
MaxSpareThreads 256
ThreadsPerChild 256
MaxRequestsPerChild 0
Workers.properties:
njipuplmapp01:/opt/hpws
Hi guys,
I'm about to update an old Tomcat-instance (5.5.quite_old) to the
latest 5.5, also I'm about to update an outdated mod_jk to the latest
version.
The old config of mod_jk had quite some depricated directions
included, so I changed them (opefully) according to the doc I found
here:http://t
> Also, I'd be curious about the big disparity between the 16MiB files
> and the other 1MiB-32MiB files... It looks like all of them are
> relatively consistent at the KiB/sec rates you show - but suddenly
> there's a huge burst of speed on the 16MiB file (for httpd). So I'd
> be really curious to
My problem seems to be most similar to this post. We are having intermittent
problems with the JBoss/Tomcat AJP 1.3 connector hanging. From searching
the JBoss and Tomcat user forums, other issues that are similar to mine are:
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=116231271819840&w=2
http://www.nabb
need to know if Apache MPM prefork or Apache worker is configured
$APACHE_HOME/bin/Apache -l
*any compiled-in modules with 'mpm' in the module-name is prefork*
*any compiled-in modules with 'worker' in the module-name is worker*
Martin Gainty
__
Verz
Apache is using worker mpm
Server version: Apache/2.0.59 HP-UX_Apache-based_Web_Server
Server built: Aug 21 2007 13:59:06
Server's Module Magic Number: 20020903:12
Server loaded: APR 0.9.12, APR-UTIL 0.9.12
Compiled using: APR 0.9.12, APR-UTIL 0.9.12
Architecture: 64-bit
Server compiled with
Greg Allen wrote:
> I am trying to use ApacheDS 1.5 with Tomcat 5.5.17.
Try a later version. You may be hitting multiple bugs that have since
been fixed.
> Now this really confuses me. Why is it using JAASRealm? That's not
> configured
The JAAS Realm is the default Realm Tomcat falls back to i
This link on Microsoft specifies this very issue..
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314882
It also says
" The connection limit refers to the number of redirector-based connections and
is enforced for any file, print, named pipe, or mail slot session. The TCP
connection limit is not enforced, but
w...@serensoft.com wrote:
> Plus, the mofidied/64-bit-savvy tomcat5w.exe which is supposed to set
> parameters for the service, complains that 'tomcat5' doesn't exist.
When you install the service you have to name it tomcat5. It is a
'feature' of that service wrapper that for a service XXX the bin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 5/18/2009 1:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> you'll find a download of 1.1.16, which builds exactly like the 1.1.12
> you were already trying to use (configure et.al.).
Yup, I already did this: no problems with the 1.1.16 version (the README
fi
On 18.05.2009 19:38, Martin Gainty wrote:
> dl/l tomcat-native-1.1.16-win32-src from
> http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi
> Cannot open include file: 'apr.h': No such file or directory?
> also i did'nt see makefile ?
Assuming yoiu're asking about Windows build? It's not yet documented,
b
Figured it out!
"How to run TOMCAT 5 as a SERVICE when running under WINDOWS 64-bit"
(enterprise 2003 in our case, but presumably this would apply to other
64-bit windows implementations):
Tomcat v5 is 32-bit, which won't run as a service under Java 64-bit.
The advice at
http://www.nabble.com/r
Martin , i think its not session, since i tried same thing in wget, first
time with network connection is working fine.
but without network connection , status is keep on waiting for response. I
think linux wget will have session management or any i think. will be any
other probs.. i cant use sessi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
After reading some of your feedback, I've decided to make some changes:
- - Using TC 6.0.18 exclusively instead of 5.5
- - Using tcnative 1.1.16 instead of 1.1.12
- - Using httpd 2.2.11 instead of 2.2.10
- - Running tests for a certain amount of
On 13.05.2009 23:28, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> My setup is tomcat 5.5.17 + mod_jk 1.2.15 + httpd 2.2.2. I am using
> AJP1.3. Every 2-3 days with no major load, tomcat throws the error:
> "SEVERE: All threads (200) are currently busy, waiting..."
>
> I have been monitoring my tomcat TP-Proce
On 14.05.2009 20:29, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> I set connectionTimeout in server.xml to 60 and now the RUNNABLE
> threads go back to WAITING stage after that time.
>
> But our other servers which are running the same configuration, same
> webapp and do not have connectionTimeout set in se
We just got Tomcat 5 to work as a service on windows 64-bit, woo hoo!
(see email with subject "running tomcat5 -- as a service under 64-bit
windows? SOLVED".)
We thought we had another new snag, but there's just a firewall or
network issue.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled email. :)
Hi Gregor,
On 18.05.2009 20:07, Gregor Schneider wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm about to update an old Tomcat-instance (5.5.quite_old) to the
> latest 5.5, also I'm about to update an outdated mod_jk to the latest
> version.
>
> The old config of mod_jk had quite some depricated directions
> included
On 18.05.2009 20:33, kvancamp wrote:
> My problem seems to be most similar to this post. We are having intermittent
> problems with the JBoss/Tomcat AJP 1.3 connector hanging. From searching
> the JBoss and Tomcat user forums, other issues that are similar to mine are:
> http://marc.info/?l=tomca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vishwajit,
On 5/18/2009 2:01 PM, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
> Yes, sure - we will upgrade at some point of
> time. But since upgrading all our servers will be some work, that may
> not happen right away.
Upgrading mod_jk is the least painful of all
Hi Rainer,
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> The error means: you told mod_jk to use it, but you forgot to define it.
>
>> All vhost-definitions within Apache are alike when it comes to the
>> jk-specs, thus I'm just posting a sample vhost-definition:
>>
>>
>> [ ...]
>
On 18.05.2009 16:43, Chetan Chheda wrote:
> Our network team is already engaged and looking into this. We had
> several instances of tomcats locking up today. I have attached one such
> thread dump here ..
>
> Can some of you pls take a look and point me into the right direction?
There are 149 T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arijit,
On 5/18/2009 3:12 PM, Arijit Sarkar Job Gmail wrote:
> This link on Microsoft specifies this very issue..
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314882
Interesting:
"
For Windows XP Professional, the maximum number of other computers that
are pe
good to know
With worker mpm the connection_pool_size defaults to ThreadsPerChild
ThreadsPerChild that in the final gives the MaxClients connections to the
Tomcat.
So the default value for connection_pool_size is always ThreadsPerChild
For threaded and hybrid servers (e.g. beos
or worker) Ma
congratulations a previously unsolved mystery has been solved
what was the solution?
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaen
On 18.05.2009 20:03, Chetan Chheda wrote:
> HTTPd.conf :
> Timeout 300
> KeepAlive On
> MaxKeepAliveRequests 100
> KeepAliveTimeout 30
HTTP Keep-Alive is nice to achieve lower latency, but it will drive up
the number of httpd threads you need. 100 requests and 20 seconds is for
most use cases to
Tomcat is listening on 0.0.0.0:80 but not responding on the public
interface. Works fine for localhost and the 10.*.*.* address, but not
the public IP.
Can't say it's been solved, but it's not a tomcat issue, there's
something else gone awry.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Martin Gainty wrote
On 18.05.2009 21:51, Gregor Schneider wrote:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> The error means: you told mod_jk to use it, but you forgot to define it.
>>
>>> All vhost-definitions within Apache are alike when it comes to the
>>> jk-specs, thus I'm just posti
Thanks! This information isn't useless... Of course, more detailed results,
after a longer test run would be more conclusive.
This appears to show that Apache is slightly faster (~4% or so) for files over
16KiB than Tomcat APR, and materially faster (~44% or more) than all other
configurations
> [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Here are figures from 3 of the servers which have
> not yet run out of threads (so the thread count does not add up to 200). I
> have taken these late at night when no users are present, so I was
> expecting all threads to be Waiting for tomcat thread-pool.
>
> 1. Total
I will be deploying a spring/hibernate web app using Tomcat 6, dbcp and
MySql5.1. I must decide on my initial tomcat dedicated deployment server
configuration and am looking for some advice:
(I am starting with one dedicated Tomcat server..will scale in time)
Based on budget, the affordable opt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin,
On 5/18/2009 4:11 PM, Robin Wilson wrote:
> Thanks! This information isn't useless... Of course, more detailed
> results, after a longer test run would be more conclusive.
Yup, that's the plan. Tonight, I'll be running with an 8 minute test to
> From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mailto:vpant...@selectica.com]
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Posting the thread dumps for the above 3 cases,
The list usually filters out attachments, as it has do
> From: johnrock [mailto:johnpi...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Tomcat better on single or multi core?
>
> Which processor configuration do you think would
> benefit tomcat more?
It's not Tomcat you have to think about - it's your webapp, and the expected
usage thereof. If the webapp is CPU bound but
You haven't given any pricing information. I guess if it were me and the
prices were all equal, I would go for the Quad-Core. If prices were not
equal, I would go for the dual core.
johnrock wrote:
I will be deploying a spring/hibernate web app using Tomcat 6, dbcp and
MySql5.1. I must deci
Hi,
I am trying to deploy a WAR with a custom context path. For some reason,
Tomcat still defaults to the WAR file name as the context path...
What I am doing is placing context.xml inside the blah.war under
META-INF/context.xml. Here are the contents of context.xml:
**
I don't know if I'd call a 4% difference a "dead heat"... I guess that would
depend on how many of those files you are serving a day... If I had 25 servers
all working full-throttle all day, 4% would be enough to require 1 more server.
If my peak load exceeds the necessary threshold, 4% could me
> From: Yaakov Chaikin [mailto:yaakov.chai...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Changing default context path
>
> Tomcat still defaults to the WAR file name as the context path...
That's how it's defined to work. The path attribute is not allowed except in
circumstances that are strongly discouraged. Chan
If you need to serve static files for a high volume website, you're
better off paying a specialty provider for it. Back when I worked at
verizon, we used Akamai for static files like images etc.
serving up a ton of large static files quickly swamps your bandwidth,
so the question isn't whether tha
Gregor,
Gregor Schneider wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm about to update an old Tomcat-instance (5.5.quite_old) to the
latest 5.5, also I'm about to update an outdated mod_jk to the latest
version.
The old config of mod_jk had quite some depricated directions
included, so I changed them (opefully) accordi
> From: Robin Wilson [mailto:rwil...@kingsisle.com]
> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content
> performance[Revised/Updated]
>
> I don't know if I'd call a 4% difference a "dead heat"...
Given the likely variability of any measurements taken in an 8-second run, even
10% or 15% would h
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance
> [Revised/Updated]
>
> After reading some of your feedback, I've decided to make some changes:
>
> - - Using TC 6.0.18 exclusively instead of 5.5
> - - Using tcnativ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John,
On 5/18/2009 4:17 PM, johnrock wrote:
> Based on budget, the affordable options I have to choose from appear to be:
> 1 single core @3Ghz
> or
> 1 dual core @~2.1Ghz
> or
> 1 Quad core @~2.1Ghz
What are the types of cores? Are any of them h
Hmm... the documentation seems to disagree with you:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/context.html
Take a look at 5th bullet.
I am just trying to figure out why that doesn't seem to work for me.
Yaakov.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys
> > [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Here are figures from 3 of the servers which
> have
> > not yet run out of threads (so the thread count does not add up to 200).
> I
> > have taken these late at night when no users are present, so I was
> > expecting all threads to be Waiting for tomcat thread-pool
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> When you install the service you have to name it tomcat5. It is a
> 'feature' of that service wrapper that for a service XXX the binarie
> smust be named XXX.exe and XXXw.exe
Just learned this today:
if you install the tomcat service as "serv
> From: Yaakov Chaikin [mailto:yaakov.chai...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Changing default context path
>
> Take a look at 5th bullet.
Take a look at the description of the path attribute, which you seem to be
ignoring:
"The value of this field must not be set except when statically defining a
C
> From: will trillich [mailto:trill...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: running tomcat5 -- as a service under 64-bit windows?
>
> if you install the tomcat service as "service.bat install yadaboing"
> then you can configure it via "tomcat5w //ES//yadaboing"
Or you can rename the tomcat5.exe and tomcat5w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/18/2009 4:40 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance
>> [Revised/Updated]
>>
>> After reading some of your feedbac
Chris, what do the numbers represent ?
You say you ran each test for 10 seconds, so I guess the numbers are not
the seconds it took, so what are they ?
I also wonder about the numbers, for example in the first column
(httpd). They seem to grow more or less lineraly as the file size
increase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 5/18/2009 4:56 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> You say you ran each test for 10 seconds, so I guess the numbers are not
> the seconds it took, so what are they ?
They are transfer Rate (KiB/sec) as measured by ApacheBench.
> I also wonder about
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>
> > From: Yaakov Chaikin [mailto:yaakov.chai...@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: Changing default context path
> >
> > Take a look at 5th bullet.
>
> Take a look at the description of the path attribute, which you seem to be
> ignoring:
>
Yes, those two look like "waiting for next request on an existing
connection from the web server to Tomcat" and "sitting idle in the pool,
waiting for a new connection to handle".
On 18.05.2009 22:44, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit wrote:
>>> [Pantvaidya, Vishwajit] Here are figures from 3 of the servers w
Hi martin,
Thanks for your reply but you have left me confused
Since Apache is setup as below
Maxclients = 512
ThreadsPerChild = 256
Wont it restrict the processes to 2 processes with 256 threads each instead of
the ServerLimit(16) ? Looking at the OS , I see 2 httpd processes each with 25
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
> The path attribute is not allowed except in circumstances that are strongly
> discouraged.
Can I suggest an amendment to the documentation as follows:
- If you specify a context path of an empty string (""), you are
- defining the default web application for this
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:43 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in RUNNABLE
> stage even with no activity
>
> Yes, those two look like "waiting for next re
> From: Yaakov Chaikin [mailto:yaakov.chai...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Changing default context path
>
> So, is it telling me that I can place bla.xml into META-INF
> directory with a tag in it and the context path
> will change to /bla? I tried that and it didn't work.
No, when inside the web
> From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mailto:vpant...@selectica.com]
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> From whatever I have read on this, it seems to me that this could
> happen if a servlet writes something to a response stream,
hi all,
i am pretty sure this has been hashed out many times but i could not get clear
guidelines on how to accomplish JNDI Realm + tomcat 6 + windows AD.
I have got JNDI Realm + tomcat 6 + windows AD integration with basic
authentication. as domain password is passed in clear text from browser
> -Original Message-
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:02 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> > From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mai
> From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mailto:vpant...@selectica.com]
> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>
> Ok - so then the question is when does tomcat transition
> the thread from Running to Waiting? Does that happen after
> AJP dr
http://www.mbaworld.com/docs/realm-howto.html#JNDIRealm
When a standard realm authenticates by retrieving the stored
password and comparing it with the value presented by the user, you
can select digested passwords by specifying the digest
attribute on your element. The value for
this attribute
On 19.05.2009 02:54, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit [mailto:vpant...@selectica.com]
>> Subject: RE: Running out of tomcat threads - why many threads in
>> RUNNABLEstage even with no activity
>>
>> Ok - so then the question is when does tomcat transition the thread
>>
97 matches
Mail list logo
