Very cool Chris, thanks for the quick reaction!
Simon out
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 1:41 PM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On 3/21/24 12:39, Simon Niederberger wrote:
> > Hi Chris
> >
> > Personally I'd go with
> >
> > XML_INPUT_FACTORY =
> >
Simon,
On 3/21/24 12:39, Simon Niederberger wrote:
Hi Chris
Personally I'd go with
XML_INPUT_FACTORY =
XMLInputFactory.newFactory(XMLInputFactory.class.getName(),
EncodingDetector.class.getClassLoader());
allowing me to place my own JAR in common/lib if I really want to (the
only scenario I
Hi Chris
Personally I'd go with
XML_INPUT_FACTORY =
XMLInputFactory.newFactory(XMLInputFactory.class.getName(),
EncodingDetector.class.getClassLoader());
allowing me to place my own JAR in common/lib if I really want to (the
only scenario I can think of is an edge-case where there's a bug in
Simon,
On 3/20/24 15:36, Simon Niederberger wrote:
What if you create an empty jaxp.properties file and make it available to the
common ClassLoader (e.g. in lib/empty-jaxp.jar:/jaxp.properties) -- does that
prevent the problem?
>
I think that boils down to what I'm already doing with the
Hi Chris
Spring's ObservationFilterChainDecorator is ridiculous, isn't it?
> What if you create an empty jaxp.properties file and make it available to the
> common ClassLoader (e.g. in lib/empty-jaxp.jar:/jaxp.properties) -- does that
> prevent the problem?
I think that boils down to what I'm
Simon,
On 3/20/24 09:59, Simon Niederberger wrote:
The whole thing is caused by Maven dependencies which pull in
com.fasterxml.woodstox:woodstox-core. The WstxInputFactory has a
@ServiceProvider(XMLInputFactory.class)
annotation, where ServiceProvider is
Hi Chris
The whole thing is caused by Maven dependencies which pull in
com.fasterxml.woodstox:woodstox-core. The WstxInputFactory has a
@ServiceProvider(XMLInputFactory.class)
annotation, where ServiceProvider is
org.ehcache.spi.service.ServiceProvider. I didn't manage to trace the
key code
Simon,
On 3/18/24 15:17, Simon Niederberger wrote:
I'm analyzing a memory leak reported by Tomcat, and have narrowed it
down to org.apache.jasper.compiler.EncodingDetector:
private static final XMLInputFactory XML_INPUT_FACTORY;
static {
XML_INPUT_FACTORY = XMLInputFactory.newInstance();
Mark,
On 2/1/2021 1:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Is the GC root above the only one? I've seen similar behaviour in the
past where weak references appear to be the cause of a leak but closer
inspection uncovers a strong reference.
Mark
Thanks for putting me on the correct track. I'm using log4j2
On 01/02/2021 06:37, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 1/31/2021 9:39 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> GC roots for cplanapi are:
>>
>> class com.sun.naming.internal.ResourceManager
>> '- propertiesCache java.util.WeakHashMap
>> '- table java.util.WeakHashMap$Entry[16]
>> '-
On 1/31/2021 9:39 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
Folks,
This is probably not a Tomcat issue, but any thoughts on how to resolve
this would be greatly appreciated.
I am running into an apparent ClassLoader leak with the following
configuration:
Windows 10 Professional (64 bit, latest updates)
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020, 16:58 Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)
wrote:
> Sorry Martin,
>
> My answers are inline.
>
Take a heap dump and analyze it!
> Thanks & Regards,
> Raghav
>
> On 22/07/20, 7:20 PM, "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
> wrote:
>
> Hello Martin,
>
> Thanks for your
The tomcat version is apache-tomcat-8.5.29
And RedHat Enterprise Linux 7.6
On 22/07/20, 7:28 PM, "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
wrote:
Hi Chris,
Please see my answers inline.
Also shared the svg graph here.
Hi Chris,
Please see my answers inline.
Also shared the svg graph here.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/o6zra7pf2o1xpge/AAA1J7BaVdPDF7s3RjPmy0xBa?dl=0
Kindly reply.
Thanks & Regards,
Raghav
On 20/07/20, 11:08 PM, "Christopher Schultz"
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Sorry Martin,
My answers are inline.
Thanks & Regards,
Raghav
On 22/07/20, 7:20 PM, "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
wrote:
Hello Martin,
Thanks for your reply
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/o6zra7pf2o1xpge/AAA1J7BaVdPDF7s3RjPmy0xBa?dl=0
Here is the link I have shared the
Hello Martin,
Thanks for your reply
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/o6zra7pf2o1xpge/AAA1J7BaVdPDF7s3RjPmy0xBa?dl=0
Here is the link I have shared the flame graph.
Also kindly check my answers in red as well.
Thanks & Regards,
Raghav
On 22/07/20, 2:33 PM, "Martin Grigorov" wrote:
Hi
Hi Ragavendhiran,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 3:55 PM Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I am seeing the memory leaks from tomcat apache in the following SSL path
> using PKCS11. Attached the flame graph of memory possible memory leaks in
> this area.
>
> Please check the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ragavendhiran,
On 7/18/20 08:53, Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman) wrote:
> The OS is RHEL => 7.6
>
>
> From: "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)" Date:
> Saturday, 18 July 2020 at 6:21 PM To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Memory leak in the PKCS11 how
HI,
Kindly suggest what could be the issue below.
Thanks & Regards,
Raghav
From: "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
Date: Saturday, 18 July 2020 at 6:21 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Memory leak in the PKCS11 how to fix the problem
From: "Ragavendhiran Bhiman
Kindly reply for the below mail,
Expecting your feedback so that I can take it forward.
Thanks & Regards,
Raghav
On 18/07/20, 6:25 PM, "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
wrote:
The OS is RHEL => 7.6
From: "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
Date: Saturday, 18 July 2020 at 6:21 PM
The OS is RHEL => 7.6
From: "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
Date: Saturday, 18 July 2020 at 6:21 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Memory leak in the PKCS11 how to fix the problem
From: "Ragavendhiran Bhiman (rabhiman)"
Date: Saturday, 18 July 2020 at 6:20 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Am 29. Juni 2016 02:26:57 MESZ, schrieb Leo Donahue :
>On Jun 28, 2016 4:57 PM, "Roman Gelfand" wrote:
>>
>> I am running a middleware application in .. tomcat...
>
>Ok. This is something you wrote and deployed or it is a third party
>war
>file?
>
>>
It is third party REST server named espresso. After looking further into
memory leaks message, I realized this is a thread that writes to mongodb.
I had also found couple of posts relating to leaks mongodb jdbc drivers.
On Jun 28, 2016 8:27 PM, "Leo Donahue" wrote:
> On Jun
On Jun 28, 2016 4:57 PM, "Roman Gelfand" wrote:
>
> I am running a middleware application in .. tomcat...
Ok. This is something you wrote and deployed or it is a third party war
file?
>
> catalina.out.prob:SEVERE: The web application [] appears to have started a
> thread
On 6/28/2016 5:57 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I am running a middleware application in the tomcat environment described,
below. After rebooting the server, the memory consumption is couple of
gigs. Couple of weeks later, I get a message, I am out of memory.
Moreover, I need to bounce the whole
quot; <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: memory-leak in org.apache.jasper.compiler.Mark|Node$TemplateText
>
> On 04/06/2016 09:22, devz...@web.de wrote:
> > thanks for help - but, are you really sure?
>
> Yes.
>
> > if i
> >
> > - set dev
On 04/06/2016 09:22, devz...@web.de wrote:
> thanks for help - but, are you really sure?
Yes.
> if i
>
> - set development=false
> - delete everything within work subdir to force recompile of every jsp
>
> then for me, the initial crawl makes jvm consume the same amount of memory
> regardless
thanks for help - but, are you really sure?
if i
- set development=false
- delete everything within work subdir to force recompile of every jsp
then for me, the initial crawl makes jvm consume the same amount of memory
regardless development true or false - and thats what i'm wondering about.
On 03/06/2016 17:14, devz...@web.de wrote:
You are NOT observing a memory leak.
> Regardless we have set "development" to true or false in
> conf/web.xml, , whenever i recursively crawl our website with wget
> (cleaning work dir before to make sure each page is being compiled
> again), i can
Thanks
> Ambica.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:34 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: memory leak in Tomcat 8.0.9
>
> First of all, the subject is wrong. There is no
ers@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: memory leak in Tomcat 8.0.9
First of all, the subject is wrong. There is no memory leak in Tomcat.
There is a memory leak in the application you are running on Tomcat.
On 20/05/2016 14:21, Sanka, Ambica wrote:
> 2016-05-19 14:03:31,161 [localhost-startSto
First of all, the subject is wrong. There is no memory leak in Tomcat.
There is a memory leak in the application you are running on Tomcat.
On 20/05/2016 14:21, Sanka, Ambica wrote:
> 2016-05-19 14:03:31,161 [localhost-startStop-2] WARN
> org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader- The web
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/16/13 6:52 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
just today, i recognized a query, such as following which was
performing very poorly, even though the JOIN was on a
primary/foreign key, and ORDER BY on primary key (which 'should' be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/15/13 4:02 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Howard,
On 4/14/13 9:53 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
I am definitely relying on user
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/15/13 4:02 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerber dcker...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher
On 4/15/2013 10:10 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerberdcker...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
On 4/15/2013 7:25 AM, David kerber wrote:
On 4/15/2013 10:10 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerberdcker...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org
wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/14/13 9:53 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
I am definitely relying on user HttpSessions, and I do JPA-level
caching (statement cache and query results cache). pages are
PrimeFaces and primefaces = xhtml, html, jquery, and
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Mark Eggers its_toas...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 4/15/2013 7:25 AM, David kerber wrote:
On 4/15/2013 10:10 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerberdcker...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/14/13 9:53 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
I am definitely relying on user HttpSessions, and I do JPA-level
caching (statement cache
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
I've had people tell me that I should run with the biggest heap I can
afford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/11/13 10:38 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Your heap settings should be tailored to your environment and
usage scenarios.
Interesting.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/11/13 10:38 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/11/13 10:38 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/11/13 10:38 PM,
Chris,
My apologies for late response; just realized earlier this afternoon that I
didn't respond.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/3/13 4:15 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
@tomcat.apache.org
CC: saumil...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
Please try to keep discussions on the mailing list to everyone can
benefit.
On 4/2/13 6:48 PM, saumil shah wrote:
For some reason ...I
On 3 Apr 2013, at 15:36, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
Please try to keep discussions on the mailing list to everyone can
benefit.
On 4/2/13 6:48 PM, saumil shah wrote:
For some reason ...I do not see Java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/3/13 4:15 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
If you don't re-deploy your webapp, then daily rolling Tomcat
restarts are not necessary. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
On 4/3/13 2:16 PM, saumil shah wrote:
I did change in Tomcat 6.0/Conf/server.xml unpackWARs=false and
autoDeploy=false
Why? I don't believe I mentioned either of those settings...
but the logs still complaint about the Deploying web
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
Please try to keep discussions on the mailing list to everyone can
benefit.
On 4/2/13 6:48 PM, saumil shah wrote:
For some reason ...I do not see Java process in Task Manager in
Windows, just Tomcat6 process. I am assuming killing
of my default as -Xms512m -Xmx1024m
-XX:MaxPermSize=1024m instead of my default -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
Appreciate all your help.
Thanks again.
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:35:50 -0400
From: ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
CC: saumil...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Re : Memory
Chris,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I understand its not a premanent solution but as a stopgap for now
? If so , we can put it as part of daily cycle to bounce tomcat6.
If you
Saumil,
On 2.4.2013 5:01, saumil shah wrote:
I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects. When the product was
deployed , everything seemed to run fine but yesterday we started experiencing
Service is unavailable error , upon enabling DEBUG logs in Tomcat , we saw
the
saumil shah wrote:
Hello there,
I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects. When the product was
deployed , everything seemed to run fine but yesterday we started experiencing
Service is unavailable error , upon enabling DEBUG logs in Tomcat , we saw
the error below
Thanks andre..can we deploy 32 bit web applications on 64 bit tomcat?
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier
Sent: 2 Apr 2013 08:51:00 GMT
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
saumil shah wrote:
Hello there,
I recently deployed one
From: saumil shah [mailto:saumil...@hotmail.com]
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
Don't top post - it's annoying and confusing.
can we deploy 32 bit web applications on 64 bit tomcat?
The point being made is that your question doesn't make any sense. There's
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: saumil shah [mailto:saumil...@hotmail.com]
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
Don't top post - it's annoying and confusing.
can we deploy 32 bit web applications on 64 bit tomcat?
The point being made is that your question doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
On 4/1/13 11:01 PM, saumil shah wrote:
I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects.
When the product was deployed , everything seemed to run fine but
yesterday we started experiencing Service is unavailable error
but as a stopgap for now ? If so , we
can put it as part of daily cycle to bounce tomcat6.
Many thanks.
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:58:53 -0400
From: ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
On 4/2/13 5:01 PM, saumil shah wrote:
Thanks so much Chris this has been very very helpful ...
appreciate you taking time out. Would stopping Tomcat6 service in
Windows 2008 R2 take care of this orphan threads if you will ?
Also, does
Hello there,
I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects. When the
product was deployed , everything seemed to run fine but yesterday we started
experiencing Service is unavailable error , upon enabling DEBUG logs in
Tomcat , we saw the error below with memory leak
Hi Warren,
thanks for the help. I found that the application
creates lots of SessionFactoryImpl objects
even though one is enough
I changed this part of webapp. Now it has only one
SessionFactoryImpl and the memory leak is gone.
bye
2012/5/24 Warren Bell warrenbe...@gmail.com
Is this the
Christian Kaufhold wrote:
Hi,
I have a leaking Tomcat App
I checked the heap with the Eclipse Memory Analyser
and it says
The classloader/component *org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader @
0x94532f50*
occupies *376.421.152 (79,51%)* bytes. The memory is accumulated in one
instance of
2012/5/24 Christian Kaufhold kaufhol...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
I have a leaking Tomcat App
I checked the heap with the Eclipse Memory Analyser
and it says
The classloader/component *org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader @
0x94532f50*
occupies *376.421.152 (79,51%)* bytes. The memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 5/24/12 8:42 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/5/24 Christian Kaufhold kaufhol...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
I have a leaking Tomcat App I checked the heap with the Eclipse
Memory Analyser and it says
The classloader/component
Is this the same server with the Wicket app you posted about earlier ?
If so, you have a Wicket app that is storing the
SessionFactoryObjectFactory on a page as a class member. Wicket stores
each page a user has been to in the user's session. If the page has
class members, then it serializes them
הילה wrote:
Security seems to be always in the hands of the wrong people.
No need for insults here, this is a new requirement which I'm not familiar
with, and that's why I asked you guys..
Instead of the JTDS, can I use Tomcat Spengo?
will it provide same results, as using a domain user for
Hey,
i've posted a message on JTDS forums, but no one answered.
I know the memory leak is caused by the dll, since when I don't use it, all
is good.
i'll open a new thread here, thanks
2011/3/6 André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com
הילה wrote:
Security seems to be always in the hands of the wrong
הילה wrote:
I've posted my problem in the sourceforge forums, but no comments have
received so far. :(
If you have any suggestions to replace this, another way to authenticate the
tomcat to the DB with user and password that do not appear in clear text,
I'll be glad to hear about it.
Have a
Sorry for the sent mail double time thing :]
i'll check the Jespa suggestion. thanks :]
keep the ideas coming, guys. every little thing could help
Thanks
Hila
2011/2/23 André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com
הילה wrote:
I've posted my problem in the sourceforge forums, but no comments have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
Bah. The OP replied to me directly (and CC'd the list) and so a REPLY
went to the OP and not to the list. Re-posting back.
On 2/22/2011 4:52 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
הילה,
On 2/22/2011 4:39 PM, הילה wrote:
I have used JProfiler to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
הילה,
On 2/23/2011 2:06 AM, הילה wrote:
I've posted my problem in the sourceforge forums, but no comments have
received so far. :(
If you have any suggestions to replace this, another way to authenticate the
tomcat to the DB with user and
I trust the people in the company, but the company's work is with sites that
any user all over the internet can access. so we want to perform a damage
control if some hacker would gain access to our web server, so if he can -
he won't get access to the DB, at least not with our help of displaying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
הילה,
On 2/20/2011 8:28 AM, הילה wrote:
I work in a company which we use Tomcat (5.5.26 and recently we've upgraded
it to 6.0.29) to run our application.
Any chance you can move all the way up to 6.0.32?
since we changed
configuration to use
Hey,
I have used JProfiler to monitor the tomcat process, but haven't found
anything useful.
you can see that the tomcat process is the only one that increasing, and it
started to happen since i switched to windows authentication.. so I think
it's connected?
what is a heap analysis? how can i
הילה
(Interesting: my Thunderbird email client seems unable to remove your name
above...)
Anyway, hi.
Your initial description says :
Until now, we used [b]SQL Authentication[/b] for the tomcat service and
configuration (user and password for tomcat to access the DB was provided
within the
Hey,
When going to tomcat site, you can download 32-bit/64-bit Windows Service
Installerhttp://off.co.il/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.32.exe
That's what I have installed. When installing this, it creates the tomcat
service in windows + the regular folder under c:\program
הילה wrote:
...
The tomcat service (on windows) ran with local system...
Ok, now I get it.
...
Now the tomcat service is running
(as a Windows domain user)
and authenticates to the DB with a domain
user
The above are two entirely distinct matters.
1) the Tomcat service was running as
I've posted my problem in the sourceforge forums, but no comments have
received so far. :(
If you have any suggestions to replace this, another way to authenticate the
tomcat to the DB with user and password that do not appear in clear text,
I'll be glad to hear about it.
Thanks
Hila
2011/2/23
2011/2/3 maxxe...@gmail.com maxxe...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Tomcat 6.0.26 on a solaris.
After I unloaded a webapp and asked tomcat to 'find leaks', it
reported a webapp leaked memory. However, when I ran a profiler on the
heapdump, there are only 2 references to the webappclassloader. Both
are
From: Michael Heinen [mailto:mhn4...@googlemail.com]
Subject: memory leak warning ThreadLocal with key of type [null] in 6.0.29
Is this a false alarm or wrong usage?
Pretty much any usage of ThreadLocal in a thread-pooling environment is wrong
usage, unless you are very careful to clean up
.
Thanks,
Bala.
-Original Message-
From: B. Balakrishna Rao
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:17 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Memory leak in using SSL with Tomcat 6.0.18
Hi Chris,
Attached is the image for incoming references for
com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl objects
Good Work Bala.
-Original Message-
From: B. Balakrishna Rao [mailto:balakrishna_...@persistent.co.in]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:29 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Memory leak in using SSL with Tomcat 6.0.18 - Solved
The problem with memory leak using Tomcat 6.0.18 with SSL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
B.,
On 8/5/2010 12:46 AM, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Attached is the image for incoming references for
com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl objects. Please let me
know if you want any further details.
This list strips attachments.
Glad that
On 04/08/2010 10:49, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Hi,
We are using Tomcathttp://www.coderanch.com/forums/f-56/Tomcat 6.0.18 on
Linux environment(Red hat Linux) for our production.
We have enabled SSL by deploying SSL certificates. We observed that, over a
period of time, the memory
On 04/08/2010 11:54, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
I tried reading the change log. It appears that in Tomcat 6.0.20 there is a
fix related to memory leak using SSL.
What I am thinking is that if this is the issue with the Tomcat 6.0.18 or an
issue with my
: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 4:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak in using SSL with Tomcat 6.0.18
On 04/08/2010 11:54, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
I tried reading the change log. It appears that in Tomcat 6.0.20 there is a
fix related to memory
On 04/08/2010 13:40, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Hi Mark,
I am trying to apply the patch that is available for the fix below:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744#c2
Why? What makes you think that is the problem you are seeing?
However, after giving the below command,
: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 6:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak in using SSL with Tomcat 6.0.18
On 04/08/2010 13:40, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Hi Mark,
I am trying to apply the patch that is available for the fix below:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/2010 10:06 AM, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
I have implemented your suggestion. I have deployed my application
in Tomcat 6.0.29 version under the same environment as Tomcat
6.0.18(test environment).
After performing the similar operations
: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 7:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak in using SSL with Tomcat 6.0.18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/2010 10:06 AM, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
I have implemented your suggestion. I have deployed my application
in Tomcat 6.0.29
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
B.,
On 8/4/2010 10:19 AM, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Please note that, the 2,996 count is on production environment.
The counts 7 and 10 are on my local environment.
Ok.
Below is the procedure I am following on my local environment to test this:
, 2010 10:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak in using SSL with Tomcat 6.0.18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
B.,
On 8/4/2010 10:19 AM, B. Balakrishna Rao wrote:
Please note that, the 2,996 count is on production environment.
The counts 7 and 10 are on my local
Hello Tom,
I am facing a similar issue. Could you please send that piece of code that
was causing you this
error, just that snippet should be good.
Thanks
Tom Price-3 wrote:
Hi all,
No more help required - I traced back all the references to the Request
objects and it did turn out to
I take your point about getting realistic heap info. It's also been
suggested that I set up profile a version just executing the Java
side without DWR in the loop.
Thanks
Ken
On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Ken Bowen [mailto:kbo...@als.com]
Subject:
I would make sure that your DAO class is closing any statements,
resultsets, and connections that are no longer being used once your
method call returns.
Since GC does happen immediately your db resources could still be in
memory.
Travis Beech
On Jan 20, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Ken Bowen
From: Ken Bowen [mailto:kbo...@als.com]
Subject: memory leak
Short version: I have a project which gets some simple info from a db
via DWR, and outputs it simply on the page. There is a memory leak on
the java side.
First off, do you really have a leak? top is not an appropriate tool for
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo