-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maggie,
Maggie Shao wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone build Tomcat cluster on Xen?
> Is there any difference?
The steps for configuration should be identical, since each OS acts as
if it is a separate physical host. I'm not sure you get
Hi,
Does anyone build Tomcat cluster on Xen?
Is there any difference?
--
Sincerely,
Maggie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gustavo,
Gustavo Araujo wrote:
> Is it possible to use the same port protocol="HTTP/1.1"
>
> In two different cluster nodes?
Are the nodes binding to separate IP addresses?
> When i put both ones in 8080 they don't balance the requests.
What beh
Guys,
Is it possible to use the same port
Hi -
Based on your suggestion which I do appreciate we added timeouts for
connect, pre_post and connection_pool so now the workers looks like:
worker.list=loadbalancer
worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=cbap1,cbap2
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
worker.cbap1.por
earliest I can.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Cluster-and-NFS-mounted-webapp-tp20176721p20213152.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail
> From: forum123 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster and NFS mounted webapp
>
> How do I set so that just the "work" directory is different
> per instance?
Look at the workDir attribute of the and elements.
By the way, you might want to consider m
rectory but different name
> like "work1" and "work2". Each app server would get its own work
> directory.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-Cluster-and-NFS-mounted-webapp-tp20176721p20190968.html
> Sent from the Tomcat
found it...
I can write a small startup script that will determine the hostname and use
a different work (in the same CATALINA_BASE) directory but different name
like "work1" and "work2". Each app server would get its own work directory.
--
View this message in co
forum123 wrote:
> We're setting up a simple Tomcat cluster using Tomcat 5.5.12. There will be
> initially 2 Tomcat instances on 2 physical Linux servers in this cluster.
> Is mounting a shared NFS folder appropriate for this?
Sharing the bin, common, server, shared and webapps
We're setting up a simple Tomcat cluster using Tomcat 5.5.12. There will be
initially 2 Tomcat instances on 2 physical Linux servers in this cluster.
Is mounting a shared NFS folder appropriate for this?
NFS will allow us to deploy updates a single time and have all Tomcat's in
t
2008 4:02 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
Paul McGurn wrote:
Thanks Mark.
I'll work at actually translating this into real documentation and
examples. As far as patching, I'm not qualified to do that, but
I'd be willing to take a crack at it
DHM wrote:
Hi -
worker.list=loadbalancer
worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=cbap1,cbap2
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
worker.cbap1.port=8690
worker.cbap1.host= edited for privacy
worker.cbap1.type=ajp13
worker.cbap1.lbfactor=10
worker.cbap1.socket_keepalive=1
Hi -
Running a Single Apache Web Server (1.3.36) to 2 Tomcat App Servers
(5.5.17) via mod_jk (1.2.19) on Unix Solaris. Apache Tomcat Connector
setup for loadbalance which it does just fine. Issue is that when 1
Tomcat goes into error state the cluster becomes unavailable. Apache
sees the 1 Tomc
]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
>
> Paul McGurn wrote:
>> Thanks Mark.
>>
>> I'll work at actually translating this into real documentation and examples.
>> As far as patching
cGurn
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:02 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
Paul McGurn wrote:
> Thanks Mark.
>
> I'll work at actually translating this into real documentation and exam
e all the source for the
docs is in xml not html.
Mark
>
> Paul McGurn
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
>
> Paul McGurn w
--
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster Deployer
Paul McGurn wrote:
> Is there any (complete) documentation on the Cluster Deployer? The official
> documentation doesn't actually say anything
Paul McGurn wrote:
> Is there any (complete) documentation on the Cluster Deployer? The official
> documentation doesn't actually say anything about it (or let alone anything
> useful at all...):
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/cluster-deployer.html
The source code is probably
Is there any (complete) documentation on the Cluster Deployer? The official
documentation doesn't actually say anything about it (or let alone anything
useful at all...):
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/cluster-deployer.html
I'm trying to set up an environment that is both cluste
In Tomcat 6, use DeltaManager or BackupManager
Filip
Lia wrote:
Hi everybody, <<...>> <<...>>
I am using
- Tomcat 6.0.18 ( but I’ve also tested the same scenario with Tomcat
6.0.16 and Tomcat 6.0.14 and I got the same problem);
- in cluster ( two machines);
- on Debian x64, 4.0.
When us
Hi everybody,
I am using
- Tomcat 6.0.18 ( but I've also tested the same scenario with Tomcat 6.0.16
and Tomcat 6.0.14 and I got the same problem);
- in cluster ( two machines);
- on Debian x64, 4.0.
When using DeltaManager (with or without sticky sessions) the cluster works
fine, but for some
not at all, it just mean your HttpSessionListeners and
HttpSessionAttributeListeners wont be invoked on the other servers
also, you could work around the problems in another way, track logins
differently
Filip
Pavan Singaraju wrote:
If we set the "notifyListenersOnReplication" to false, will
If we set the "notifyListenersOnReplication" to false, will it not cause
problem if there is a load balancer at work?
--
Pavan Kumar Singaraju
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Madonesa sanjaya wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I have deployed my application
Madonesa sanjaya wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed my application on a clustered environment and used session
created event to monitor the number of users login to each machine (Using
SNMP MIB counters). But once a user is login to one machine counter gets
updated in every machine. I believe this is du
Hi,
I have deployed my application on a clustered environment and used session
created event to monitor the number of users login to each machine (Using
SNMP MIB counters). But once a user is login to one machine counter gets
updated in every machine. I believe this is due to session replication.
jic wrote:
Hello,
i am having problem with tomcat cluster on the same machine...
This is a config from first node:
channelSendOptions="4">
className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.ReplicationTransmitter"
replicationMode="fastasyncqueue"
compress=&quo
Hello,
i am having problem with tomcat cluster on the same machine...
This is a config from first node:
channelSendOptions="4">
className="org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.ReplicationTransmitter"
replicationMode="fastasyncqueue"
compress="tr
Thanks.
Some more questions:
-- In a scenario with two nodes, if I shutdown one, the other is instantly
ready to receive and respond to requests, or it is necessary to wait a
while?
In a procuction scenario we cannot wait, because requests are frequently.
-- The 35 seconds refers to the initial ti
HI Andrew,
Your mcastDropTime="1000" is to low. Please set it to 3 and it
is true that you must wait
> 35 sec before you can restart a cluster node. Use the Java Service
Wrapper or add this to your start scripts to configure this.
Peter
Am 22.02.2008 um 11:48 schrieb Andrew Hole:
Hello guys!
We are trying to test Tomcat clustering but we are getting some problems.
Sometimes (Log2) everything works fine but in other cases the cluster
doesn't work (Log1). The only difference is the time that we wait after we
shutdown a node. When we make a request after shutdown a node, c
gp456 wrote:
thanks for your reply.
first the fix you mentioned is not in the current tomcat release (6.0.16).
Since I have to build/patch the tomcat for a productive environment what
whould you recommend: patch the 6.0.16 sources or build tomcat from the
newest trunk?
either or, they haven'
28,id={19 -115 -1 -101 8
>> 91
>> 66 -91 -112 105 -121 109 -82 11 56 50 }, payload={}, command={},
>> domain={},
>> ]
>> [CLUSTERLOG] pool-2-thread-4 - INFO - 02/12/2008 10:25:11,742 -
>> ThroughputInterceptor - ThroughputInterceptor Report[
>> Tx Msg:892 messages
>> Sent:5,82 MB (total)
>>
Andrew Hole wrote:
I have both tomcat instances on the same machine, and tcpListenPort are
different on both server.xml: instance 1 setuped with 9016 and instance 2
with 9017.
When I stop one of tomcats, the other is notified properly with the
following message:
12-Feb-2008 11:19:57 org.apache.
On Feb 13, 2008 12:08 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008 7:23 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you tried starting with a minimal configuration and then adding
> > options as you deem necessary?
>
> What you consider the minimal configuration?
See the doc
you already asked this question, and I already answered.
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=120290898727190&w=2
Filip
gp456 wrote:
Hello,
we have a similar problem as Raul Garcia has posted in
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-6---Cluster-error.-to14921385.html#a14921385
this message, but we're
[CLUSTERLOG] NioReceiver - WARN - 02/12/2008 17:34:23,895 - NioReceiver -
Channel key is registered, but has had no interest ops for the last 3000 ms.
(canc
elled:false):[EMAIL PROTECTED] last access:2008-02-12
17:34:17.957
and finally:
this message most likely indicates that the thread pool hand
e:74,46 seconds
Tx Speed:2,10 MB/sec (total)
TxSpeed:2,10 MB/sec (application)
Error Msg:0
Rx Msg:20534 messages
Rx Speed:0,01 MB/sec (since 1st msg)
Received:156,92 MB]
...
Many thanks for your help!!!
--
View this message i
Maybe Dave means to just run one Tomcat instance. There is in the TC doco info
about the minimalist TC if memory serves. Since you are attempting a type of
load-balancing it would serve you well to reply with a lot more info about your
overall architecture:
OS: vendor, build version, updates (s
What you consider the minimal configuration?
On Feb 13, 2008 7:23 AM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 10:59 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different
> instances
> > of tomcat (on the same server). BUT,
On Feb 12, 2008 10:59 AM, Andrew Hole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different instances
> of tomcat (on the same server). BUT, i don't know why, session replication
> doesn't work.
> Could you help me to find why?
Have you tried starting with a
Hi!
I have both tomcat instances on the same machine, and tcpListenPort are
different on both server.xml: instance 1 setuped with 9016 and instance 2
with 9017.
When I stop one of tomcats, the other is notified properly with the
following message:
12-Feb-2008 11:19:57 org.apache.catalina.cluster
Dumb question: is everything supposed to be defined on the same IP (loopback?)
and port?
Andrew Hole wrote ..
> Hello guys!
>
> I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different instances
> of tomcat (on the same server). BUT, i don't know why, session replication
> doesn't work.
Hello guys!
I've the following configuration on server.xml for two different instances
of tomcat (on the same server). BUT, i don't know why, session replication
doesn't work.
Could you help me to find why?
Thanks
Instance 1:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
that is correct, we thought of this scenario and decided that we
wouldn't support it.
Not unreasonab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
|> In fact, you still are not covered, because removing the object from the
|> session merely removes the reference. If the session replicator is
|> running and copying, say, a Map to another machine in the clust
> From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
> cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
>
> that is correct, we thought of this scenario and decided that we
> wouldn't support it.
Not unreasonable to av
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
given that the session should represent a client state,
and by the time the cluster tries to serialize it, the
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| no, its just common sense, given that the session should represent a
| client state,
| and by the time the cluster tries to serialize it, the request is over.
There's no guarantee t
> From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException on tomcat
> cluster with SimpleTcpClusterstrategy
>
> given that the session should represent a client state,
> and by the time the cluster tries to serialize it, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| no, its just common sense, given that the session should represent a
| client state,
| and by the time the cluster tries to serialize it, the request is over.
There's no guarantee that the request is complete
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| if you look at the stack trace, there is no error in the clustering
| code. something is modifying your session attribute while the
cluster is
| trying to send it
I'm suggesting t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| if you look at the stack trace, there is no error in the clustering
| code. something is modifying your session attribute while the cluster is
| trying to send it
I'm suggesting that this should not be conside
if you look at the stack trace, there is no error in the clustering
code. something is modifying your session attribute while the cluster is
trying to send it
Filip
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| the solution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| the solution is to not store stuff in the session modified by other
| threads, if that's the case, then its not really something you wanna
| store in a session
What's wrong with modifying something in a sessio
the solution is to not store stuff in the session modified by other
threads, if that's the case, then its not really something you wanna
store in a session
Filip
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| this is not a cl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
| this is not a cluster error, basically, you are storing a map in the
| session, and someone is modifying the map while the cluster is trying to
| replicate it
How should this be solved? The OP could really onl
this is not a cluster error, basically, you are storing a map in the
session, and someone is modifying the map while the cluster is trying to
replicate it
org.apache.commons.collections.LRUMap
Filip
LERBSCHER JEAN-PIERRE wrote:
Hi,
We work on Tomcat clustered server (5.5) and we have thi
Hi,
We work on Tomcat clustered server (5.5) and we have this exception in the log
(at 5-10 TPS).
Could you explain us what's hapenning. Have you a solution? Thanks.
Exception:
SEVERE: Failed to serialize the session!
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at
org.apac
h load balancing of Apache
"Tomcat Users with Tomcat cluster
List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
If there is no such worker, or the worker is nor usable, the request
is handled like it wouldn't have a route in the session id, or no
session at all.
Also if there is directive sticky_session_force=true
and the worker is not usable then the 503 is retu
Rainer Jung wrote:
If there is no such worker, or the worker is
nor usable, the request is handled like it wouldn't have a route in the
session id, or no session at all.
Also if there is directive sticky_session_force=true
and the worker is not usable then the 503 is returned to the user.
J
Doubt in how lbfactor works
to with load balancing of Apache
"Tomcat Users with Tomcat cluster
List"
cc
Subject
Please respond Re: Doubt in how lbfactor works
towith load balancing of Apache
"Tomcat Users with Tomcat cluster
Hi,
I am using a set up of Tomcat cluster with 2 instances (tomcatA and
tomcatB, tomcatA being the primary server and tomcatB being the
standby server) under an Apache Server used for load balancing. I am
using Tomcat only for failover balancing and load balancing is
entirely done by apache.
In
Hi Shiby,
Shiby Maria John schrieb:
Hi,
This is my worker.properties for Apache server for clustering 3
instances of Tomcat in my machine.
# The advanced router LB worker
worker.list=router
# Define a worker using ajp13
worker.worker1.port=8009
worker.worker1.host=localhost
worker.worker1.typ
Hi,
This is my worker.properties for Apache server for clustering 3
instances of Tomcat in my machine.
# The advanced router LB worker
worker.list=router
# Define a worker using ajp13
worker.worker1.port=8009
worker.worker1.host=localhost
worker.worker1.type=ajp13
worker.worker1.lbfactor=1
# D
Tomcat Users,
As far as horizontal scaling, is there an upper limit on the number of
nodes for a tomcat cluster? I haven't seen anything in any of the
documentation. I was just wondering how many nodes have people been running
in a cluster?
Thanks,
Chad
Hi all,
I'm getting this error on a tomcat cluster configuration:
Dec 11, 2007 10:08:23 AM
org.apache.catalina.cluster.tcp.FastAsyncSocketSender$FastQueueThread
pushQueuedMessages
WARNING: Unable to asynchronously send session with
id=[F0C4C2B44AAB98DEA8AE8CF572463189-1197364103377] - me
Daniel M Garland wrote:
Thanks for the response
So is it better to have one cluster rather than one per host?
easier to manage and troubleshoot one cluster than many.
What about hosts that don't have clustering enabled?
that's not a problem, clustering only applies to webapps with the
eleme
Thanks for the response
So is it better to have one cluster rather than one per host? What about
hosts that don't have clustering enabled? Surely there are advantages
with having a separate cluster, its listening on a different address so
it would have its own message buffer etc.?
My current
it would have to be the multicast address that is unique to take care of
the problem, however, easier to run one cluster instance at the engine
level, the cluster knows what vhost a piece of replicated data belongs to
Filip
Daniel M Garland wrote:
OK I've figured out what's happening, but not
OK I've figured out what's happening, but not how to fix it!
I'm running a single Tomcat instance that is hosting some virtual hosts,
and we have three Tapestry web applications. For those unfamiliar with
Tapestry, a Visit object is defined to represent the user's session and
is sort of a faca
Hi
In another thread I was advised to change my virtual host config, which
has moved this problem on a little bit. I now have a manger context for
each virtual host, rather than just on localhost, and these manager apps
seem to report the session count; its only the localhost manager that
doe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan,
Daniel M Garland wrote:
> Another strange thing is since this started happening I don't ever see
> the session count in the manager app increase above zero, even though if
> I sit in front of the webapp my session is persisted across the
> cluste
Christopher Schultz wrote:
Is Eclipse re-setting the serialVersionUID for each compile, or do you
have one explicitly set in your code? (Meaning, does the
serialVersionUID ever change?)
Well in Eclipse I said 'add generated ID', but this declares a final
static long that hasn't changed becaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel,
Daniel M Garland wrote:
> stream classdesc serialVersionUID = -139355480548586,
> local class serialVersionUID = 8444624889687850885
Hmm... those numbers are /totally/ off. I was hoping for some kind of
jumbling of hex values for the two
you probably have some rogue java process still running somewhere with
clustering enabled,
Filip
Daniel M Garland wrote:
Hi all,
I've been running two Tomcat 5.5.20 servers in a cluster for some time
on Mac OSx but we've recently moved to 64-bit architecture (Debian
etch) . I tried as far a
Hi all,
I've been running two Tomcat 5.5.20 servers in a cluster for some time
on Mac OSx but we've recently moved to 64-bit architecture (Debian etch)
. I tried as far as possible to keep the config the same, so only the OS
has changed (and I also got the Apache Portable Runtime going). Howev
Tomcat 5.5 has an all-to-all replication mechanism, hence all nodes
should be identical. you would only need to see the sessions on one node
to get a picture of what is looks like elsewhere.
there is a flag called "notifyListenersOnReplication" this is only for
attribute replication for nodes
across cluster members.
Is this correct that valueBound will be called on only the cluster members
which were alive when the
object was put in the session ?
Is there any other way I can track all active session of a cluster ?
Thanks,
Vinod
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.
Rainer,
I setup a test httpd + loadbalancer with jk 1.2.24 and could reproduce
the problem over and over again. Then I patched the source and have
been unable to reproduce the problem with the patched mod_jk.so.
So the patch looks good.
Regards
Ben
On 8/1/07, ben short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I'll give it ago first thing tomorrow, well after a cup of tea :)
On 8/1/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi Ben,
>
> could you try the following patch for 1.2.24:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/fail-on-status.patch
>
> I guess you can build the module yourself
hi Ben,
could you try the following patch for 1.2.24:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/patches/fail-on-status.patch
I guess you can build the module yourself (it's easy: configure
--with-apxs=PATHTOAPXS; make; make install). Now simply download the
source of 1.2.24 and use the patch
Sure for stable operation, but what if the machine reboots, tomcat
starts up and your webapp doesn't for some reason. This situation
could occur then.
Many thanks for your help with this one.
Regards
Ben
On 8/1/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I think I understand the pr
Hi Ben,
I think I understand the problem now, and it is a jk bug. For stable
operation you should really use the disable/stop feature. Nevertheless
I'm starting thinking about how to fix this in a good way.
The bug has to do with the new "fail on status" feature you use. It is
not very old,
>> Is length 1090 correct?`So does the full body have that length?
Yes firefox reports that the page is 1k in size, via the web
developer's tool bar. I have seen it happen in IE 6 and 7 also.
Would it be possible for me to email you directly the output of
wireshark for both one bad and one good a
ben short wrote:
Ok I have used wireshark and see that the request is sent to the
apache httpd. The next first packet i get back contains the
following...
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:57:25 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.4 OpenSSL/0.9.7a mod_jk/1.2.23
Content-Length: 10
Ok I have used wireshark and see that the request is sent to the
apache httpd. The next first packet i get back contains the
following...
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:57:25 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.4 OpenSSL/0.9.7a mod_jk/1.2.23
Content-Length: 1090 ***NOTE every
You could dig deeper into two different directions:
- protocol: is the content-length in the response headers correct? Or
does it use chunked transfer, and is this OK?
- sniff the network in front of the apache: do the packets actually get
send back to the browser?
Regards,
Rainer
ben sh
I'm not getting anywhere with this :(
I have set the logging to trace for mod_jk and I can see all the
response packets. I have also turned on our applications response
logging and can see that the running webapp writes the full page to
the response. I can then see it all in the mod_jk logs. But t
ben short wrote:
I have altered the code to write out which webapp generated the page
to the html, so i can see where the partial responses are comming
from.
What I see is
I stop the webapp on box 2. I make a request and I see part of the
page. The html shows that the partial page was gener
ploying first set the activation of the
> > >>>> worker to stooped, which means it will no longer forward any requests
> > >>>> and the load balancer will transparantly choose another worker. No
> > >>>> recovery and errors.
> > >>>&
>>> recovery and errors.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you use sessions without replication, you could also set a worker to
> >>>> disabled before going into stopped. With disabled requests for existing
> >>>> sessions will still be forwarded, but n
out of
use.
Also add timeouts to your config. We have a new docs page for 1.2.24
(which will go live tomorrow). You can have a look at it under
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/docs/jk-1.2.24/generic_howto/timeouts.html
and consider using the option recovery_options.
Regards,
Ra
without sessions.
> >> Depending on your session timing the target might thus get slowly out of
> >> use.
> >>
> >> Also add timeouts to your config. We have a new docs page for 1.2.24
> >> (which will go live tomorrow). You can have a look at it under
&g
sing the option recovery_options.
Regards,
Rainer
ben short wrote:
Hi,
I have a odd issue occurring with my tomcat cluster serving ~50 lines
of the page from a stopped webapp.
My setup is as follows...
Box 1
Apache running a jk mod loadbalancer. It loadbalances between an
instance of tomcat on
/tomcat-connectors/jk/docs/jk-1.2.24/generic_howto/timeouts.html
>
> and consider using the option recovery_options.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
>
> ben short wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a odd issue occurring with my tomcat cluster serving ~50 lines
> >
.
Regards,
Rainer
ben short wrote:
Hi,
I have a odd issue occurring with my tomcat cluster serving ~50 lines
of the page from a stopped webapp.
My setup is as follows...
Box 1
Apache running a jk mod loadbalancer. It loadbalances between an
instance of tomcat on this box and on box 2.
Box 2
Hi,
I have a odd issue occurring with my tomcat cluster serving ~50 lines
of the page from a stopped webapp.
My setup is as follows...
Box 1
Apache running a jk mod loadbalancer. It loadbalances between an
instance of tomcat on this box and on box 2.
Box 2
Apache running a jk mod
201 - 300 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
