maybe this would be the time to apply my patch? :-)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1666
Am 03.12.2008 um 16:18 schrieb Mathias P.W Nilsson:
Yes, thanks!
This is what I have been trying to do but with no luck.
--
View this message in context:
Wouldn't it be more powerful to override / hook into the process of
adding a component of a container?
Something like that ...
new WebMarkupContainer(id)
{
@Override
public void onComponentAdd(Component child)
{
// check the sealed flag, decorate the child, throw exception, or
do
, 2008 at 11:27:39AM +0100, Peter Ertl wrote:
Wouldn't it be more powerful to override / hook into the process of
adding a component of a container?
Something like that ...
new WebMarkupContainer(id)
{
@Override
public void onComponentAdd(Component child)
{
// check the sealed flag, decorate
+0100, Peter Ertl wrote:
I was thinking about something like this:
[warning, sketchy pseudo code will follow]
method org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.add(Component... children) :
- call empty overridable method onComponentAdd(Component child)
for each component
- add component
protected
WicketRuntimeException(e.getMessage(), e);
} catch (ExecutionException e) {
throw new WicketRuntimeException(e.getMessage(), e);
}
}
Peter Ertl wrote:
...
return new
String(tester.getServletResponse().getBinaryContent
) {
throw new WicketRuntimeException(e.getMessage(), e);
}
}
Peter Ertl wrote:
...
return new
String(tester.getServletResponse().getBinaryContent(),
tester.getServletResponse().getCharacterEncoding());
...
--
View this message in context:
http
Great work!
You should put this on the Wiki :-)
Am 05.11.2008 um 11:22 schrieb Jörn Zaefferer:
No voodoo neccessary, got it working:
protected String renderPage(Class? extends Page pageClass,
PageParameters pageParameters) {
//get the servlet context
Won't it be easier / will it work to use WicketTester for this?
Am 05.11.2008 um 17:26 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
make sure you do this in a thread other then the request thread so you
dont mess up any threadlocals.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Jörn Zaefferer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
Am 05.11.2008 um 18:18 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
you still have to do it in a separate thread :)
-igor
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Peter Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't it be easier / will it work to use WicketTester for this?
Am 05.11.2008 um 17:26
wickettester
the actual application object also.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Peter Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So would this be ok ?!
(caution! untested!)
try
{
final String html =
Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(new
CallableString()
{
public String call
have a look at XStream :-)
Am 21.10.2008 um 11:25 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
What's the nice / correct way to do this in Wicket:
I have a client side bit of JS that looks something like
getData(URL);
It expects to get back an XML document like
data
entryfoo/entry
If it's just a line use Label
Am 09.10.2008 um 21:01 schrieb miro:
Using panel I have to write a .html file which I dont want to do
becasue my
html code is very little just a line ,
next option is Fragment but this is not clear, neither the api doc
nor the
wicket examples please can
.
Cheers
Peter
Am 29.08.2008 um 08:17 schrieb Stefan Fußenegger:
honestly, no, I didn't. however, using last modified times still
results in
an HTTP request and a 304 Not Modified reply. better than nothing,
but
client-side caching is still preferable.
regards
Peter Ertl wrote:
@stefan
shouldn't be
served by Wicket at all, but I really don't like to use proxies,
CDNs or
whatever voodoo for low traffic web sites: server-side performance
isn't an
issue there while client-side performance is.
regards
Peter Ertl wrote:
That's not true.
this settings will generate urls like
It's a standard tomcat problem that everybody sooner or later
encounters...
This will work for you:
http://cagan327.blogspot.com/2006/05/utf-8-encoding-fix-tomcat-jsp-etc.html
Just use the EncodingFilter and I bet my [EMAIL PROTECTED]@#$ it will work :-)
Am 29.08.2008 um 11:04 schrieb Ray
why don't you open up an issue in JIRA?
Am 29.08.2008 um 12:22 schrieb Jörn Zaefferer:
Here is a first patch for the RevisionVersionProvider:
Index: src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/mergedresources/versioning/
RevisionVersionProvider.java
@stefan: did you take into account
getApplication
().getResourceSettings
().setAddLastModifiedTimeToResourceReferenceUrl(true)??
Cheers
Peter
Am 28.08.2008 um 18:20 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
sfussenegger now has access to wicketstuff...
i dont know which parts should go into
+1 for including support for cometd in wicket core
I expect server side push the next great thing in web development :)
my 2 pct
Am 26.08.2008 um 22:19 schrieb Matej Knopp:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:24 PM, jWeekend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej,
What are the implications of the
Just having the logo would look even more magical *g*
Less is more
Loads of people would ask what this 'wicked' logo means and you have
all the attraction you possibly want :-)
This would make it easier to proselytize alien web developers because
you don't have to hunt them down
first
use AjaxRequestTarget.get()
Am 17.08.2008 um 15:36 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 13:36 +0200, Wayne Pope wrote:
Hi,
But how do I get that target?
As the items are being rendered using a ListView - the only time I
can get
access is during the populateItem - but thats a
I don't need nearly as much extensions for wicket because
it's such a no-brainer to write my own custom components...
I think JSF is a big joke with nobody laughing :)
my 2 %
Cheers
Peter
Am 07.08.2008 um 17:59 schrieb Timm Helbig:
Sorry, not really.
*) JSF doesn't consume less Memory
Even Mac guys agree that development by Sun would be much better :-)
They still lag behind with java 1.6 (no current 1.6.0_07), do not
support powerpc for 1.6 anymore, can't run 32bit on 1.6 and can't run
64bit on 1.5 etc.
Yeah, java by apple suckzz !
Am 17.07.2008 um 16:08 schrieb
However this will not be true if you change the render strategy *imho*
getRequestCycleSettings
().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER)
+1 for applying the patch as it's not only a matter of correctness but
also of taste
Am 02.07.2008 um 16:06 schrieb Johan
+1 -- sounds reasonable, doesn't break anything (hopefully :-), easier
path-based security on apache front end proxy,
Good work, David :-)
Am 30.06.2008 um 07:33 schrieb David Leangen:
Wouldn't this be useless except from the fact of been pretty ?
Yes, it would indeed be useless
pseudo code example:
mount(/, ... indexed HomePage.class)
mount(/foo, FooPage.class)
What should happen with this path:
url = /foo
- call HomePage with indexed parameter 'foo' ?
- call page FooPage.class ?
not having indexed urls for '/' makes sense for me
Am 27.06.2008 um
I think this is what AbortWithWebErrorCodeException is for
Am 11.06.2008 um 13:24 schrieb Erik van Oosten:
Hi Milan,
I think you should throw the exception AbortWithHttpStatusException.
If you change your mind and want to set the HTTP status code, but
provide content as well, then call
Strong typing is my friend. Refactoring is my friend. The stronger
and clearer we make typing throughout Wicket the happier I'll be.
Code is written once and maintained a hundred thousand times. I'd
always trade verbosity for maintainability.
+1 for that --- very nice said! I totally
+1 for do it right, no matter if the api breaks or not
Am 07.06.2008 um 09:20 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
so i tried to remove the generic type from component in
sandbox/ivaynberg/wicket-generics branch and ran into what i think is
a deal breaker for this design
class component {
public void
I remember that having more than one wildcard in an type expression
seems to be inherently broken.
Usually you can rewrite something like
void foo(Class? extends Page? pageClass)
into something like
X extends Page? void foo(ClassX pageClass)
I would bet this solves your problem :-)
Eventually you might be interested in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1666
Am 02.06.2008 um 09:02 schrieb reikje:
why do you want to add extra params in the RequestParameters?
The use case is this. The request comes in with a URL like
/press/article/headline.html. I will take
1) Generifying* Wicket
[X ] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
2) How strongly do you
I filed an issue in April 2007 (the patch probably unusable right now)
to support autocompleting multiple fields
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-488
An example would be to select an address from the autocompleter which
will fill in the fields for street, zip code, city, etc.
I just uploaded a patch a few days ago to support indexed resource
urls. Hopefully the wicket devs will apply it to the codebase.
I guess it would be a good base for RESTful resources without explicit
session state.
It's like Martijn describes, but for shared resources.
Cheers
Peter
Am
Damn it, forgot to mention the jira issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1666
I don't think there already something in wicket like this...
Am 29.05.2008 um 17:01 schrieb Peter Ertl:
I just uploaded a patch a few days ago to support indexed resource
urls. Hopefully the wicket
of REST *imho*
Am 29.05.2008 um 17:05 schrieb Johan Compagner:
we already can mount shared resources
and you can give them parameters so that you dont have to have
session but
can create the same resource depending on the params
johan
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Peter Ertl [EMAIL
+1 for finishing generics (no matter how ugly it gets), then
refactoring / removing the things that suck
Am 22.05.2008 um 11:37 schrieb Johan Compagner:
exactly Repeaters is very nice that the populateItem is generified..
I think
that is really handy..
And if the EditPage now wanted a
at this point because of the convenience and flexibility it offers.
Guice
looks nice, but the tool support isn't there yet.
That's why I use guice. Because you don't even need tools :-)
Am 21.05.2008 um 03:32 schrieb Nick Heudecker:
I have to agree with James. I wouldn't build an
I suspect the multiple wildcards (?) in one type expression causing
all that trouble.
probably an issue of the compiler and not of the language spec.
public class Test
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
bad(Derived.class); // ok
bad(Base.class); // compile error
Also if you use CompoundPropertyModels (widely used) then generics are
completely not used anymore at all..
Speaking for me, I never use expression based property models in any
mid- to large-sized project to have complete(!) refactoring support in
my IDE.
String expression are a lot less
Maybe this can help a little:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6384510
(verified with java 1.5 on mac os x leopard)
Am 21.05.2008 um 11:13 schrieb Martijn Dashorst:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
if we drop that then we can
Don't forget to make it language independent so it runs on C#, Scala,
Fortran or Algol 68 as well :-)
Am 20.05.2008 um 22:15 schrieb James Carman:
If you are creating a product, why do you need to be able to plugin
a different IoC container (Guice vs. Spring for example)? Do you
think a
, Peter Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't forget to make it language independent so it runs on C#,
Scala,
Fortran or Algol 68 as well :-)
Am 20.05.2008 um 22:15 schrieb James Carman:
If you are creating a product, why do you need to be able to
plugin
a different IoC container (Guice vs
this one will do:
public X extends Component? void foo(ClassX clazz);
however, the subtle differences between this and igors version are
really hard to get.
Am 15.05.2008 um 16:31 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
this is the usecase we are talking about. i get a compile error,
which sucks.
(ClassX clazz);
???
seems like this is our first generic bug :-)
Am 15.05.2008 um 16:41 schrieb Peter Ertl:
this one will do:
public X extends Component? void foo(ClassX clazz);
however, the subtle differences between this and igors version are
really hard to get.
Am 15.05.2008 um
StringModel looks ambigious to me, will it extend
- LoadableDetachableModel
- IModel
- Model
- AbstractReadOnlyModel
-
???
Am 14.05.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Doug Donohoe:
Let me outline what I believe the benefits are. For example:
add(new LabelString(tournamentName,
In IDEA it is annoying when you enable inspection 'Raw use of
parametrized class' which is generally quite useful
it will complain on
protected boolean isPageAuthorized(final Class? extends Page
pageClass)
so, no, you don't get a warning but a potentially useful inspection is
more or
used to warnings, i tend to do something about
them and clean up my code. i do not want to turn this warning off,
because as you said yourself it is a very useful warning, if i turn it
off i might as well not be using generics...
-igor
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Peter Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED
wicket 1.6 = scala-based ? *lol*
Am 14.05.2008 um 23:28 schrieb Eelco Hillenius:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the whole generics thing turned out to be
quiet a lot crappier then i thought it would.
:-)
Generics for models: great. Generics for
Of course it's there... The script seems to be broken (Firefox issue,
not Wicket)
Am 30.04.2008 um 16:44 schrieb Vitaly Tsaplin:
This file exists. I can open it...
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Peter Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
that's not wicket but firefox...
try reading
Have you tried putting that javascript behavior into an wicket
behavior attached to the component?
something like...
textbox.add(new MyJQueryCustomBehavior())
Am 30.04.2008 um 09:41 schrieb carloc:
Hi,
I'm using JQuery together with Wicket. I have this problem that
whenever I
A poor man's solution could be:
You could rewrite your URL through e.g. a front-end apache and
mod_rewrite.
response: convert any occurrence of '?wicket' to '?foobar' in url
request: convert '?foobar' to '?wicket'
Am 30.04.2008 um 03:57 schrieb Johan Compagner:
Currently it is not easy
that's not wicket but firefox...
try reading the filename:
file:///C:/Program%20Files/Mozilla%20Firefox/components/nsSessionStore.js
Am 30.04.2008 um 12:17 schrieb Vitaly Tsaplin:
Hi everyone,
Firebug is complaining as follows:
[Exception... Component is not available nsresult:
Great!
So could you share your experience?
Am 02.04.2008 um 11:58 schrieb Fabien D.:
My problem is fixed! :)
I search response for my question : is it possible to use
MultiFileUploadField, UploadProgressBar together?or
UploadProgressBar is
only for simpleUpload?
--
View this message in
use AbstractResourceStreamWriter
Wicket got to have a more structured api for this common task.
usually it's not wicket but you when something is not working the way
you expect it
Am 01.04.2008 um 09:31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello:
I am trying to export dynamically generated
+1
Am 18.03.2008 um 10:50 schrieb Gabor Szokoli:
+1
On 3/17/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everybody is invited to vote! Please use
[ ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
Let your voices be heard!
please mind that you shouldn't create anonymous model classes as
they keep the reference to the page/panel and you will fall into other
memory issues.
could you elaborate on that?
Am 13.03.2008 um 16:47 schrieb Leszek Gawron:
Maurice Marrink wrote:
I believe refreshingview has better
whew - glad to hear :-)
[having probably hundreds of anonymous models in his projects]
Am 13.03.2008 um 17:46 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
actually not in 1.3. our serialization is smart enough to take this
into account if i remember correctly.
-igor
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Leszek
-1 for letting components handle focus. There's only _one_ focus that
can set on a page at a time. What if several components demand focus?
Who will be the winner?
Also, not every WebComponent can receive focus (Label, Image, ...) but
only FormComponents (input, select, button, ...)
I
Why not simply use
new java.io.File(client_file_name).getName() ?
Returns the name of the file or directory denoted by this abstract
pathname.
This is just the last name in the pathname's name sequence.
If the pathname's name sequence is empty, then the empty string is
returned.
Dont change wicket, it's fine :-)
Actually I got this working without any web.xml or WEB-INF/ and it's
possible!
The things is: When you use the wicket filter you also need to add the
DefaultServlet (or any servlet that is mapped to your wicket filter
path)
it looks like that in my
Also you should do this instead:
Context context = new Context(server, /, Context.SESSIONS);
you write:
Context context = new Context(server, /);
As far as I understand your page will not be stateless anymore once
you use ajax.
Am 31.12.2007 um 12:59 schrieb based:
Hi
I have a stateless page which holds product datas. And it has a tab
component which uses Ajax.
I know a way to do it with Page Bookmarks (#tabName). But i wonder
is
I wouldn't separate that but put admin and user into one application.
- same code base (easy sharing)
- no two web sessions that need to be linked
- easy deployment
you my 2ct
Am 22.12.2007 um 11:12 schrieb Per Newgro:
Hi *
i try to adapt the phonebook example to my needs. What i try to
Looks interesting...
MySession.get()
Will this reliably work in WicketTester or are there implication you
should be aware of?
Regards
Peter
Am 20.12.2007 um 10:27 schrieb Sebastiaan van Erk:
Or Session.get(), or better yet use MySession.get() where in
MySession you define the static
You could submit a suggestion on jira...
After all this is open source :-)
Am 12.12.2007 um 23:39 schrieb Loren Cole:
Ah! thank you.
I apologize if I'm resurrecting a dead horse, but why isn't this
done with
css?
I saw some discussion about it from last summer, but the last
comment in
101 - 165 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
