Would there be any chance implementing QL inside the Browse tab? That
would become really useful.
Best,
Oskar
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Versions group.
To post to this group, send email to
I second that!
Best,
Oskar
On Nov 16, 5:32 am, Ketan Padegaonkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
The revision logs in the timeline view does not have support for
detecting hyperlinks.
It would be great if I could just click on the URL in the timeline view
to navigate to it, instead of
I experienced the same thing and found that the problem was that I had
incorrect permission for the .subversion folder.
After I changed ownage of the .subversion folder, everything worked
fine.
When in your home directory, type the following and change username
to your username and group to the
When I commit, I would like to be able to select each file of a commit
to verify the changes before checking in
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Versions group.
To post to this group, send email to
I would like a list of previous commit messages that I can select and
edit before commiting
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Versions group.
To post to this group, send email to
Once I commit, I would like to see, in the same windows, the revision
number that I have just committed(instead of flipping over to the
console panel)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Versions group.
Or better, a dropdown of the last 5 commit messages. I find myself re-
typing quite a lot of the last commit comments I used.
Best,
Oskar
On Nov 17, 2:10 pm, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like a list of previous commit messages that I can select and
edit before commiting
Hi
I just had an email from Beanstalk, where I had registered for a free
account, offering me a 10% discount off cost of Versions now it is out
of beta.
I see on the front of the Versions website http://www.versionsapp.com/
a buy now button marked with the price of €39 (euros)
The link is definitely not working.
Please sort it out asap and I'll be getting a license.
Gemma
On 17 Nov 2008, at 16:01, Paul Willis wrote:
Hi
I just had an email from Beanstalk, where I had registered for a free
account, offering me a 10% discount off cost of Versions now it is out
Anyone have any ideas what font the word Versions is in on the new
site? I'm really digging the font.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Versions group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi guys,
As the author of the license agreement, please let me clear up the
intent of these limitations.
Here's the relevant text from the EULA:
The Commercial License and NFR License both do not allow Versions to
be activated and used on more computers than the number of computers
you have
Wow!! Seems this made it in to the new version! amazing!
On Nov 10, 11:42 am, Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was also a number for changes made to the
repository that haven't been updated in the working copy?
Just a little longer... ; )
Hey Guys,
I purchased and downloaded the new Versions app today. I must say,
that I absolutely LOVE it so far. The recent updates are great. I'm
only experiencing one problem so far, and it might have to do with the
continuous updates / version checking that the newest version does.
The
Hey Daniel,
Thanks for reporting, we'll look into it soon.
Kindest regards,
Koen Bok - madebysofa.com
On Nov 17, 6:22 pm, Daniel Dickison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 1.0 release seems to use a whole lot more memory than beta 9 did.
I'm guessing it has to do with the number of modified
Hey Guys,
I purchased and downloaded the new Versions app today. I must say,
that I absolutely LOVE it so far. The recent updates are great. I'm
only experiencing one problem so far, and it might have to do with the
continuous updates / version checking that the newest version does.
The
thanks for the info. license purchased and deployed on my 123, er 2
macs. good work! (why did i have to pay the full price, even though
the code was displayed? well, nevermind)
all the best, chr
On Nov 17, 5:53 pm, Dirk Stoop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
As the author of the license
Hey Ceriel,
The .subversion directory is : /Users/USERNAME/.subversion (the .
makes it invisible in Finder by default - use the shell to see it)
Mark's tip below about changing the permissions/ownership of the
directory is promising too. I haven't tried the 1.0 release yet, maybe
this bug
Hi Koen,
Unfortunately, it still fails.
Invalid machine ID 02=DEE1e
Any help would be appreciated. If you think it's still related to the
servers being overloaded, I can wait another day or so.
Thanks
Jeff
On Nov 17, 11:41 am, Sofa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jeff,
Indeed our servers are
To help my purchasing decision, can the authors confirm if svn merge
and svn switch are planned features? Thanks.
reference post:
http://groups.google.com/group/versions/browse_thread/thread/736ec0d2642d5144/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Activation?! Ugh.
No thanks. I've had enough of that crap with Adobe and Microsoft.
Unfortunate deal break for me. What a bummer.
On Nov 17, 11:53 am, Dirk Stoop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emphasis should be on Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your
convenience decide to allow you to
Never mind me, it works now
On Nov 17, 6:46 pm, REBELinBLUE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to purchase versions but my coupon isn't working
The check button returns the following response to the AJAX request
{coupon_valid: false, coupon_discount: 0.00, price_ex: 39,
price: 46.41,
I'm also seeing the same issue. Invalid License error when
attempting to register using the info provided in the registration
email.
Thanks,
Steve
On Nov 17, 10:25 am, Peekay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble as well - but I'm getting Invalid License quite
quickly in response. I
Is there a way to reverse whatever Versions did to it? I suspect worst
case I could just do the checkout over again (I hope).
The actual repo isn't affected. Just checkout the repo again.
If you need details:
If you have uncommitted changes, you either have to commit them now
(obviously
Anyone that has had to deal with Adobe or Microsoft activation errors
and problems knows that product activation is an insult to the
customer. Anyone who has bought DRM music and had the licensing
service go away knows this. Anyone who has tried running an old game
only to discover that the
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time I want to close the program, I get this message that stays
up for ever. I don't know if I wanted long enough but after 10 minutes
I forced the program to close.
Any idea?
I had the same problem but only during
Me too. I get Invalid machine ID 02=DFj5D
and the support form isn't working.
On Nov 17, 8:38 am, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I purchased a single license, received it via email, and attempted to
install it. It doesn't work - I'm getting an Invalid machine ID
error when I try and
Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home
email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with
my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try
and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home
address before clicking
Bump for this, well-stated.
It's a shame that companies feel they have to do this: it
inconveniences paying users, and is a minor obstacle at best for
anyone that really wants to steal the software.
I've been burned a few times in the past, and I'm pretty disappointed
to find that they've
Strange. All the other software I've purchased was 'delivered' and
works just fine without any product activation ;)
And I'd say comparing the activation of Sofa to Adobe's is a bit
unrealistic. The likelihood of Adobe or their activation servers
going away is far, far, far less than Sofa's
Jeff,
It appears that it is taking the default mail address out of the
Address Book. When I modified my Address Book entry to set the
default mail address to my proper email, Versions picked it up
properly.
Steve
On Nov 17, 12:32 pm, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something interesting I
Steve,
Thanks, I figured that's what was happening. My concern was more that
this was related to the registration bug (i.e. it was using an address
book email address to calculate a checksum to feed into the license
check, instead of using the email address from the registration form).
Long shot
Snap. I am experiencing the exact same issues too only I received two
emails with the same license key - one to my work email address and
dot-mac, and the other (again) to my work email address and MobileMe.
When I purchased the license, I used my MobileMe address, and I used
my dot-mac when I
By the time I posted, it looks like the answer of where the app was
getting my work email address from was posted herein. Thanks, at least
it appears that nothing untoward is going on :)
On Nov 17, 8:48 pm, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snap. I am experiencing the exact same issues too only I
Hmm... registration is still borked, I haven't (won't) try with my dot-
mac as I'm wanting to move away from it. Hopefully the guys can fix up
the license database on their end.
Versions is definitely populating via the default mail address in the
Address Book.
Additionally, Mail is now showing
I've been sitting back watching the threads here and it seems that
there is a decision to be made by the company.
In my opinion, as a long-time software developer and senior manager
for a multi-million dollar business, it appears as though the v1.0
release wasn't tested too well. Nor, were the
Even Valve had issues when Half-Life 2 went gold thru their Steam
service.
I suggest a little bit of patience and things will be working normally
soon enough.
On Nov 17, 10:06 pm, Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been sitting back watching the threads here and it seems that
there is a
What would you suggest to them as a license model? It sucks that decent
people have to put blocks up on decent software because indecent people
steal it, the fact is that it's the indecent people who are wasting your
time, not the developers who want to be paid for their work (time).
On Mon, Nov
Paid, got my code. Copy/Pasted it from the email. Can't register. WTF?
This has been such a great experience in beta. This license though,
sucks, as does the bugginess of this launch (I too had to force-quit
the app after the auto-update).
Why is 1.0 so different from the last beta? Isn't the
Hey guys on the Versions team
Wow, what a day! Launches suck, and it sounds like you guys have your
hands full with technical issues.
Thanks for making an attractive SVN client that /feels/ right and
integrates will into my Mac workflow, that my designers, editors, and
junior developers
On Nov 17, 4:17 pm, Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you suggest to them as a license model?
1. Generate a license key based on details that I provide when I
purchase the license,
including full name, company and email address. Make sure that you can
derive
these details from the key.
2.
It must be Lucida Grande/Lucida (if you are on a Mac), if not then
you'll see Verdana o sans-serif
On Nov 17, 5:27 pm, david.vanscott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any ideas what font the word Versions is in on the new
site? I'm really digging the font.
Hey David,
It's Neutraface.
Kindest regards,
Koen Bok - madebysofa.com
On Nov 17, 11:14 pm, ErneX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It must be Lucida Grande/Lucida (if you are on a Mac), if not then
you'll see Verdana o sans-serif
On Nov 17, 5:27 pm, david.vanscott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ditto - Same experience.
Auto-update to 1.0. Waiting for transactions to complete
Wait ~10 minutes - force quit.
Versions auto-relaunches.
Select Versions:Register Versions...
Enter serial number, check terms box, click register.
Header says processing
Wait several minutes - nothing.
Hey guys,
We know there are some activation issues right now, mainly because our
server overloaded. We are looking into it and it should be fixed
pretty soon. Sorry for that.
David: you can use any name there you want, so I'd use the name of the
person that will actually use the license.
Hey all,
We're still working on it, sorry for the troubles. I'll keep you
updated.
Kindest regards,
Koen Bok - madebysofa.com
On Nov 17, 10:03 pm, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... registration is still borked, I haven't (won't) try with my dot-
mac as I'm wanting to move away from it.
Thanks for the kind words all. We did indeed get bitten by some bugs
and are solving them as we speak.
Pete, if you have specific stability issues with Versions please let
us know and we can help you out.
Kindest regards,
Koen Bok - madebysofa.com
On Nov 17, 10:55 pm, javery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everone,
We're getting closer to a solution and have almost figured out the
regression of the registration bug.
If some of you who are experiencing similar issues with registering
could email a system profile to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we'd really
appreciate it. Please use the subject
I have a working directory, let's call it wd1, that contains
external definitions to a different repository host. That repository
host must be reached through ssl, and requires certificates for
authentication.
I am able to put information in ~/.subversion/servers specifying
certificates and
Thank you so much for your response. Although I still don't like the
activation, your answers at least clear up a few things enough that at
least alleviate most of my concerns.
On Nov 17, 5:18 pm, Sofa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all, I know not everyone is fond of activations, and they have
Hey Zav,
Good point, especially considering we are Illustrator users
ourselves :-)
We will look into it.
Kindest regards,
Koen Bok - madebysofa.com
On Nov 17, 10:49 pm, Zav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One area where the SVN documentation is very poor is that it tells you
that you can set the
Hey Robert,
Thats what we get for adding features at a 1.0 :-(
We will look into it and either make it work or provide you with a way
to disable auto updating for that specific repository.
Sorry for the troubles.
Koen
On Nov 17, 11:52 pm, Robert Goldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a
We're sorry about the problems with the website.
The feedback form has been tried and tested, but for some reason it
failed the moment more than a handful of people actually started to
visit the website.
We're working to have these issues fixed asap.
- Dirk
the Versions team
On Nov 18, 12:09
There's something called SSHAskPassTool that quit unexpectedly when I
force-quit Versions 1.0. It's part of the Versions package. The log
says:
Application Specific Information:
*** Terminating app due to uncaught exception
'NSInvalidReceivePortException', reason: 'connection went invalid
while
Did product activation actually work for anyone? I purchase directly
after upgrading the beta and after entering in the details provided in
the email I get Invalid License, please try again
Let me know if anyone is having any luck.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
I find it difficult to see if the app is updating the cirrent view
since the only indication is a tiny spinner icon that appears at the
top of the Name column. When I work in a large repository this
header if often scrolled out of view. It would be adventageous if the
main refresh icon in the top
I would add Branching support to that request.
On Nov 17, 11:32 am, echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To help my purchasing decision, can the authors confirm if svn merge
and svn switch are planned features? Thanks.
reference
got exactly the same question, hope somebody can explain.
On Nov 18, 7:51 am, xprmntlav8r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The newest release of Versions has an indicator to the right of the
working copy bookmark. When I place the cursor over this indicator I
get a popup that tells me 1 local
There's a known problem with activation right now.
We're scrambling to get it fixed asap.
More news soon,
- Dirk Stoop
the Versions team
On Nov 18, 1:44 am, AussieAbroad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did product activation actually work for anyone? I purchase directly
after upgrading the beta
Branching/tagging are supported in the form of copying, which is how svn
branches/tags.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Versions group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
If you've made changes to your working copy, they are local changes. If
someone else has committed changes to the repository, and you haven't
updated to get them yet, then these are remote changes.
HTH,
Ray
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
got exactly
I'd like to agree with this, you guys must have had a great and
terrible night at the same time:-)
On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Kerri Miller wrote:
Hey guys on the Versions team
Wow, what a day! Launches suck, and it sounds like you guys have your
hands full with technical issues.
On Nov 18, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Sofa wrote:
Hey Robert,
Thats what we get for adding features at a 1.0 :-(
We will look into it and either make it work or provide you with a way
to disable auto updating for that specific repository.
Hi koen,
Great to hear you guys will look into this:-)
Great, message sent. As someone whose purchased the software and is
failing the registration process I sure would appreciate a fix. It's a
mystery why some developers continue to punish their customers with
these activation schemes despite evidence that it does nothing to stop
piracy, and may
Hi,
MANY thanks for getting the license issue resolved!
I have one other outstanding issue with Versions now. I keep getting
the above message every 5 minutes or so. Apparently, Versions is
trying to contact my OLD svn hosting service (for some reason). I
recently moved all my repos to a new
Hi Dirk,
Just FYI, I've updated to 1.0.1, but the issue described at the
following thread persists:
http://groups.google.com/group/versions/browse_thread/thread/9b2eb95368581ca9/ffce5157f64961cf#ffce5157f64961cf
Cheers,
David
On Nov 17, 7:03 pm, Dirk Stoop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the
Hey Chris,
I think others have experienced the same bug. I know I have
experienced this one
many times. I'm waiting to see if they post a fix of some sort in one
of the other posts.
~ Ryan
On Nov 17, 7:23 pm, wchrisjohnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
MANY thanks for getting the license
Ryan,
I sure hope so. I just clicked on the Accept for this session and it
STILL came back in about 5 minutes or so, asking again.
I've just shut down the app rather than continue to be bothered by the
popups...
~ Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Version 1.01 fixed it for me, thanks for the quick update!
Jeff
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Versions group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
The History Log dialog displays two show changes buttons: an upper
button below the list of revisions, and a lower below the list of
changed paths in the revison. The lower button's function shows the
diff between revisions for the selected path. And the upper does...
what? All it seems to do for
With the help of several people on the list we've been able to figure
out the root of the Versions registration problems some of you have
run into.
If you click Check for Updates... in the Versions menu, Versions
1.0.1 will be available, which should allow everybody to register
Versions as
I keep getting this popup asking for my credentials to Server Realm:
Authorization Realm. I believe it is trying to get access to my Time
Capsule but for some reason no matter what I do, it keeps popping up.
Can make a guy a bit insane. Anyone else solve this?
I'm still seeing these entries in the console.log:
2008-11-18 00:05:20.644 Versions[12782] *** -[NSCFString
stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString:]: selector not
recognized [self = 0x16524ae0]
2008-11-18 00:05:20.647 Versions[12782] *** -[NSCFString
There are some areas that are screaming for the ability to diff.
For example: if I right click a file and choose Revert X to
Revision and the history comes up, I should be able to right
click any of those revisions and either view the full file or do a
diff with another version.
I'm totally confused by how the Revert to Revision.. feature works.
I have a file, let's say main.c, currently checked out at rev 8. I
want to revert to rev 6. So I right click on main.c, choose Revert
main.c to Revision... and double click on rev 6. Now I've got rev 6,
but if I make changes
Hi Dirk,
I'm glad you guys understand how developers work (Work on only one
machine? no way! Minimum: laptop + desktop, and as others have noted,
often: desktop (home office), desktop (office), laptop (everywhere
else!)).
However, I think your license agreement should be explicit in granting
Do a google search for svn merge
II know, I know.. but honestly, its what you're looking for.
(also, check back about a week or so in this mail group ;) )
-k-
On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Sam H wrote:
I'm totally confused by how the Revert to Revision.. feature works.
I have a file,
76 matches
Mail list logo
