All right, I know, I'm sorry. My only excuse is that I'm British.
I'm genetically programmed to whine.
Brilliant video!
On 29 Jul 2010, at 20:56, John Coffey wrote:
> Exactly Schlomo, I knew of Jonny Goldstein orinally from this Yahoo
> Group and welcomed him to Philly 2 years ago. I met
and boredom in the edit.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 23 Jul 2010, at 13:22, Richard Amirault wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rupert Howe"
>
> (snip)
> > I've been meaning to mention Pluraleyes here - it's a bit of
> software
> > t
all the clips synced up, link them & then start cutting.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 23 Jul 2010, at 10:34, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Let's be clear: the H1, although it might mount on a camera, has no
> mic
> level out suitable to plug in to your cam's mic input. Audio w
all the clips synced up, link them & then start cutting.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 23 Jul 2010, at 10:34, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Let's be clear: the H1, although it might mount on a camera, has no
> mic
> level out suitable to plug in to your cam's mic input. Audio w
e Xacti
clips straight into iMovie, which transcodes them into its own
editable format anyway? Then you delete the clips you don't want in
iMovie, while keeping all the original footage on your HD?
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 23 Jul 2010, at 01:17, Ron Watson wrote:
> Hey everybo
and the external recorder file and matches the
waveforms. Magic.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 23 Jul 2010, at 05:24, David Jones wrote:
> Anyone use one of these Zoom mics on their camera?
>
> The new H1 looks like great value at $99 and very versatile:
> http://www.zoom.co.j
Link and Blurb:
http://www.reelseo.com/free-webinar-html5-video/
Tomorrow, Wednesday July 21st at 11am Pacific time, we will be holding
a FREE webinar titled, Dive into HTML5 Video. This webinar will
offer you the unique opportunity to learn about HTML5 video from true
experts on the subj
ions.
It's just that YouTube didn't work for the small community of people
making this specific type of content a couple of years ago. So - no
argument.
Turns out from what Brook said that there is some of that type of
content on YouTube, it's just that I haven't f
ion with videos from all
of them and see a clear coherent link.
Maybe all this stuff is still going on, I just don't see so much of it
any more.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 19 Jul 2010, at 13:41, compumavengal wrote:
> No, I don't think it is dead but it has been evolving
future for personal
videoblogging, or whether it was just a strange passing anomaly that
only resulted from that brief moment in time.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
rsonally, I use Tumblr for easy reblogging of things I find on the
web, and Posterous when I need to set up a new videoblog for a
specific project like a festival.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 17 Jul 2010, at 05:15, Pranab Chatterjee wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave! That was a great lis
lt in editing app:
http://chapterplay.tv/
Rupert
On 1 Jul 2010, at 18:03, calebjc wrote:
>
> I feel a sea change in some ways for video with the new smartphone/
> cameras, but at the same time, to look professional lot of the
> skills and support equipment are very old school.
&
s.gd/d8SJb
and article & video about the N8 in-phone editor: http://is.gd/d8Ssh
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 29 Jun 2010, at 22:30, Caleb Clark wrote:
> This video says it's all iPhone4, no color correction, but I saw
> some helmet
> cam shots with what looked like a diffe
What a ridiculous design flaw.
Putting anything in there - putty, vaseline, etc, seems a dangerous
way to go.
Suck the hole?
On 28 Jun 2010, at 13:38, mgmoon wrote:
> Hey folks. In the past I would just message Jan and she'd help me
> figure out my audio issues. But I think this one may requi
I've been looking for something that does this for a long time.
Facebook and YouTube kind of do it, but their privacy settings are
fiddly and I wouldn't trust them for anything really private. I think
interface is everything. Not only do people need something to share
their pics and vids
of lost ad revenue. Too many sacrifices
a producer has to make, for a free silent audience.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 21 Jun 2010, at 01:49, David Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Rupert Howe
> wrote:
> >
> > I've been asked to give some f
. They don't seem to take advantage of the huge amount of
metadata in the feeds.
I'm also interested in how it affects revenue - with decreased
tracking of ads in videos and views of ads on your sites, for instance.
Opinions gratefully received. It might make a difference!
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
like it's 2005.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 19 Jun 2010, at 16:02, Adam Quirk wrote:
> See you guys at 6pm tonight at the Bushwick Starr.
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Adam Quirk
> wrote:
>
> > There's a Facebook page for Vloggercue if anyone is
utomatic slideshows when
you email them multiple pictures, too.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Rupert Howe
> Date: 13 June 2010 20:43:28 BST
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Send by email, share on Wordpress?
>
Pixelpipe.com - by email, on their site, and they have mobile apps for
iPhone, Nokia Share, etc too.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 13 Jun 2010, at 20:31, gogen001 wrote:
> Hi.
> Sorry if this has already been answered and discussed, but since
> blip.tv no longer accepts vids by
used. Seems a shame to waste them if they can be recycled. And
obviously it'd be nice to see what other people could do with more
time & talent.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
cc: Artists In The Cloud Google group
Thanks for these, JD. I haven't used them - interested to check them
out.
There's also Kaltura:
http://corp.kaltura.com/technology/editing_and_annotation
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 8 Jun 2010, at 07:24, JD Lasica wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Haven't popped in here fo
ia. But this has tipped the balance
for me. I'll be getting one as soon as I can afford it.
Can't wait to play with it. Wish I had a bit more cash to splash on
it right now.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 7 Jun 2010, at 21:16, elbowsofdeath wrote:
> OK so finally the iPhone
nteresting to see how they rebuild it in HTML5.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 29 May 2010, at 15:20, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Not familiar with navigaya.com.
> Dont see info on site and requires login to go deeper but no signup.
> Care to elaborate?
>
> On Sat, May 29, 201
ools have been made with HTML5
video so far. It'll be interesting to see what the HTML5 version of
Navigaya.com looks like, which they say is coming soon. Recently
launched as Flash only - nice full page video/web TV, social media &
browsing interface - a bit like the interfaces
It's not low end for anyone here! (Despite all our bluster about
codecs and prosumer editing tools!) ReelDirector is one of the main
reasons I'd consider getting an iPhone, especially since Nokia hobbled
their in-phone editor. I used to shoot & cut everything in my phone.
I miss being a
ussion has revolved a lot around Jobs's
fudging of h.264 as 'open', and the difference he makes between that
and Theora in his short response to Hugo?
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert Howe wrote:
> >
> > In all Jo
f to mention it says to me
that it undermines his argument about H.264 v Flash, even though I
agree with most of his points about Flash.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 2 May 2010, at 08:15, Joly MacFie wrote:
> A fair point is made in the comments in that article, that it isn't
>
e profusion of IPTV Set Top Box, internet ready TV
sets and portable devices like the iPad this year.
Anyway, not perhaps a videoblogger thing, but I wouldn't say just a
crock
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 2 May 2010, at 00:56, David Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Rupert
it's still interesting to hear how businesses are selling online
video at the moment.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv/
On 1 May 2010, at 10:44, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Essentially it looks like a sales pitch for Brightcove.. perhaps they
> should be paying you to attend.. :)
>
> On Sat,
It's free?!
If anybody here is going to this, would love to have a peek at their
notes :)
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 30 Apr 2010, at 18:56, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Free - 28 tix left - http://
> brightcovevideomonetization.eventbrite.com/
>
> -- Forwarded message
er.com/philcampbell
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 23 Apr 2010, at 08:18, David Jones wrote:
> Hi
> I've been offered a gig to do a live streaming blog from an event for
> 3 days in the US, payed for by the (big) company running the event.
> Never done anything like this before,
Brilliant.
On 16 Apr 2010, at 19:59, Heath wrote:
> Anyone who does online video should take a moment and watch this
>
> http://mikemoon.net/vlog/2010/04/16/a-moment-2/
>
> From one of the best out there..love ya mike...
>
> Heath
> http://heathparks.com/blog
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this
, but
read some bad reviews online.
The one that seemed most attractive & recommended, and which I ended
up getting, was the G-Tech 2TB G-Raid. Cost me £250, which is about
US $375. It's doing really well so far, but then they always seem to
be fine until one day they fail to mount..
Awesome - thanks Adam. Checking them out now.
David, that's just what I was talking about. The Apple loops & tunes
are great - just expanding my library :)
Would still like to hear anyone else's suggestions.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 16 Apr 2010, at 16:05, Adam Quirk w
I'm trying to expand my list of stock/royalty-free music sources -
particularly websites. Which supply tracks that can be used for
commercial as well as non-commercial use?
Do you have your own favourites or lists? I'll compile & blog a full
list to share.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
Further to my post yesterday, I just saw this. Steve Jobs replied to
an email from someone asking about the future of final cut.
http://macsoda.com/2010/04/13/steve-jobs-next-final-cut-studio-will-be-awesome/
He said:
"Next release will be awesome."
Um. That's i
spam
On 16 Apr 2010, at 11:12, Ed Smith wrote:
> http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcmk8xrj_140hbr3j9pb
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/g
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Rupert Howe
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I thought earlier today that Irina should have been organising the
>> Streamys. Now I realise that Irina & Rox is the dream team. Someone
>> should tell them.
>>
>>
>>
recognized for hard work."
> Rupert: agree that having more women involve might have helped and
> tech
> should have been the "given."
> Quirk: "People are rightfully pissed." Yeah.
> Mark: Disrespecting the audience is a clear problem, I agree. If you
>
both film & TV.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 15 Apr 2010, at 21:20, Jay dedman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Adam Quirk
>
> wrote:
> > I'm so used to Premiere at this point that I probably won't switch
> unless
> > some open-sourc
them a shot...you can get
> a free full working trial for 30 daysFor PC's I think it's the
> best editing software out there
>
> Heath
> http://heathparks.com/blog
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk wrote:
> >
> > I just sa
engine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xso6CGdsl2c&feature=player_embedded
And thought about the possibility of switching back to Adobe CS5 video
apps on PC
You obviously like Premiere? I haven't used it properly since the
nineties, I don't think.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
Sorry - pasted wrong link:
http://www.cineform.com/neoscene/
On 15 Apr 2010, at 16:35, Rupert Howe wrote:
> Have you tried using Cineform Neoscene AVIs?
> http://www.videoguys.com/Item/CineForm+Neo+Scene+PC/54E4543435F454E4.aspx
> Comes highly recommended for easy cutting of 5D Mk2 clip
Have you tried using Cineform Neoscene AVIs?
http://www.videoguys.com/Item/CineForm+Neo+Scene+PC/54E4543435F454E4.aspx
Comes highly recommended for easy cutting of 5D Mk2 clips in full HD
with Premiere.
Costs $99, but they have a trial.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 15 Apr 2010, at 16:11
years ago, but that was also a couple of
versions ago, so it might be better at it now.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 15 Apr 2010, at 14:27, David Jones wrote:
> For those playing along at home...
>
> Been using Ulead VideoStudio 12 for many years now, and the last few
> months for
way
- but not decisively, just annoyingly? Given Microsoft's record of
driving web professionals mad with their browsers, you have to worry
that sanity will not prevail here.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 14 Apr 2010, at 22:43, elbowsofdeath wrote:
> Forgot to say that its also
eat that Google Open Sourced VP8, though. A bright spot in all of
this, hopefully.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 12 Apr 2010, at 23:55, Michael Verdi wrote:
> This is pretty awesome:
> http://newteevee.com/2010/04/12/google-to-open-source-vp8-for-html5-video/
> That could seriously c
osh the Orpheum Theatre and the self-satisfied LA types in the
room?
And above all, given that it's about web video, it should have been
short.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 12 Apr 2010, at 23:17, elbowsofdeath wrote:
> So I hear the Streamy's this year were a disast
I always forget that the week starts on Sunday. Sunday's my offline
day. Actually, I've just finished 6 full weeks of offline days - and
haven't got back to my 12seconds yet, so I might crank that up again.
Twitter hashtag is #vbw2010, it seems.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
I always forget that the week starts on Sunday. Sunday's my offline
day. Actually, I've just finished 6 full weeks of offline days - and
haven't got back to my 12seconds yet, so I might crank that up again.
Twitter hashtag is #vbw2010, it seems.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
I think that weekend would be the third anniversary of Pixelodeon.
Which seems like a scarily long time.I'm pretty sure I came back
from Pixelodeon thinking that we were all going to change the world.
Much has happened since then... but not that. Yet.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.t
http://worcester.craigslist.org/web/1684265692.html
Participatory Culture Foundation (creator of Miro - getmiro.com) is
looking to fill a part-time web and technical role. We are an open-
source, non-profit software development organization.
Our organization has strong technical and design cap
there are indie producers making hundreds
of thousands. And that you at Blip have succeeded while always
trying to do the right thing. Great work! :)
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 9 Apr 2010, at 16:26, mikehudack wrote:
> Thought I'd chime in about this.
>
> Blip.tv's mi
That old video of yours about your mum - interrupted with your Coke ad
- springs to mind, Jay - is that still online somewhere?
On 9 Apr 2010, at 13:47, Rupert Howe wrote:
> It's always about context, isn't it? I'm used to seeing adverts on
> videos now, but rarely ev
have been about $12,000 over five years if I'd run adverts.
Which would be better than a kick in the face, but not exactly a
living wage. And the presence of adverts would most definitely not
have fitted with almost any of my content.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 9 Apr 2010, at 13:24,
Congratulations!
On 9 Apr 2010, at 02:28, David Jones wrote:
>
>
> I just hit my first anniversary video blogging too.
>
> Dave.
>
> _
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thanks Tom - don't feel shy about adding your podcast URL as a
signature, for our easy access.
I usually do (so do most people here, I think) I was just being lazy
today because I was talking to myself.
Rupert and Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 31 Mar 2010, at 19:04, Tom Dolan wrote:
Hey Rupert, here's a video where Gene Fama gives a great comparison of
the two mics in action on a 5D Mk2, which I think is the camera you're
thinking of attaching it to, isn't it?
http://vimeo.com/2707206
On 31 Mar 2010, at 12:51, Rupert Howe wrote:
> excellent - i can ha
t. That way if
> you get any crazy peaks you can just delete the standard channel
> during that scene and double up your backup.
> AQ
> Sent via dynamic wireless technology device
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Rupert Howe
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:51:41
>
excellent - i can have a thread all to myself.
well, Rupert, it seems to me after a moment's consideration that the
Stereo videomic is probably better for atmosphere and group
discussions, whereas the more directional mono videomic would be
better for interview use. does that sound
and the range and response isn't improved by having stereo, is
it? what am i missing?
On 31 Mar 2010, at 12:30, Rupert Howe wrote:
> Does anybody have any experience comparing the quality of the Rode
> mono & stereo videomics? I know they're popular with videobloggers.
>
Does anybody have any experience comparing the quality of the Rode
mono & stereo videomics? I know they're popular with videobloggers.
Bring it on.
On 24 Mar 2010, at 12:21, mgmoon wrote:
> Okay folks, get those camcorders outta the closet and prepare to
> shoot 7 videos in 7 days.
>
> Come on... take a couple minutes and write down some ideas.
> You have a couple weeks before it starts.
>
> I know you can do it! get involved.
Newteevee did a recap of the last decade in online video - makes for
interesting and nostalgic reading:
http://newteevee.com/2010/01/01/the-decade-in-online-video-part-1-the-early-years/
On 24 Mar 2010, at 00:32, Jay dedman wrote:
> > I have been searching for a while but with little success. I
Yes, I posted about it on 22 Jan - nobody replied. There's some good
stuff there.
Particularly things like that the average watch time for a short form
video online is 1:15.
And that YouTube is only 36% of all video tracked by Mefeedia.
Blip and Vimeo combined are 23%.
Which obviously leaves
gure that
out. But as much as some of us might feel squirmy about awards
ceremonies, I think the Streamys help a lot by pointing out the good
stuff. Otherwise, where do we look to find it? Meanwhile, the age
of widespread IPTV is speeding towards us.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 19 F
mber that I think your vlog
is awesome, and this is *not* some kind of personal thing as you
implied. Just if anyone says "why have a video blog at all" to "i
shoot in 320", you can bet I'm going to reply, fairly vigorously. To
anyone, in whatever forum.
Rupert
http
hy it's not OK to
tell people they shouldn't be shooting in low resolutions. If you
don't need to use HD (and why do you need to use HD for personal /
family videoblogging like Adam & I do?) then using it is akin to using
a gas guzzling SUV to do the school run.
Rupert
http
solution they can easily do.
>
Finally - everything Adrian and I have said is about why they can do
whatever they want - not because they *should* be doing anything.
There are a lot more things at play here than just shooting at the
best possible resolution.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
en most people watch most video embedded somewhere
between 320 and 640.
For a whole bunch of reasons, I wouldn't be videoblogging if I had to
do everything in HD. I'm still posting 320x240 via 12seconds every
day - and other people may not see the point in what I do, but I love
it.
Rup
d, really -
but I see why: it limits their content & bandwidth & storage costs to
those producers who are more likely to add Blip's adverts to their
videos.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
.
On 8 Feb 2010, at 17:38, Heath wrote:
> Oh, I just had to comment on this, for me I
Awesome!
On 9 Feb 2010, at 14:22, Cris Thomas wrote:
>
> Just to follow up on my original microphone questions...
>
> I ended up going with two Mics. A Rode Video Mic that attaches to
> the cold shoe and inputs dual channel audio (I don't know if it is
> really stereo or not, probably not). A
r be taken down
by Google - for some reason they like to kill user-generated hacks -
so it's not as secure as if it were a service offered by YouTube
itself. Hopefully it will be eventually, though.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 6 Feb 2010, at 03:18, Tom Dolan wrote:
> Hi Rupert
Previously I would have used Blip for this, but they and Vimeo now
prohibit you from publishing any videos which promote businesses. I
think I'm going to be using YouTube a lot more from now on, for
everything.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 6 Feb 2010, at 00:08, Jay dedman wrote:
people - she's young.
And one of the reasons why the nightmarish fake video diary of Fred,
which I linked to before, has been so phenomenally popular - he's a
kid. Ditto the other fictional phenomenon, LonelyGirl15...
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 2 Feb 2010, at 08:48, Rupert
n.net
People like Ryanne Hodson and Michael Verdi did awesome video diary
work from 2004-6.
http://ryanedit.blogspot.com
http://michaelverdi.com
I'll let others jump in with specific examples of videos because I
suddenly have to run to take my daughter to school!
Rupert
http://twittervlog.
Give it a few hours - try again. Chances are it'll pass. In the
meantime, try exporting and uploading a different version - use an
Apple iPod setting as an easy option. And also export a 10 second
clip from your video and upload to see if the same thing's happening.
Rupert
On
aw a Zoom H4N audio
>>
>> recorder in action on a Canon 5D Mk2 shoot a couple of weeks ago, and
>>
>> I'm going to get one for myself.
>>
>> It's a portable audio recorder with XLR inputs and on board mics.
>>
>> There's a video about usin
here (including mounting it
on your camera), which is part infomercial for Zoom, part infomercial
for Zacuto, but still has a lot of interesting stuff in it.
http://vimeo.com/4782593
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
ave found the pistol grip to be the best way
to hold a camera, especially for videoblogging. I wish every small
camera was built like that. And when you're not hand-holding it, you
can put it on a little tripod, so it doesn't matter.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 28 Jan 2
and set to stun!
On 27 Jan 2010, at 06:59, Joly MacFie wrote:
> > Record the room silent and then lay that beneath everything else.
> (No
> > room is actually silent and this is standard practice.)
> >
>
> and invert the phase!
>
> --
> -
videoblogging with HV30: http://www.vimeo.com/6143526
So if I had $600/800, I'd probably get one of those.
But I don't know what 2009's hottest mid-range HD camcorder was.
If I won a few grand on the lottery, I'd get myself an EOS 5D Mk2 with
a nice lens, like a shot.
Rupe
erent types of cables away from each other, and if you need
to cross them, do so at right angles.
Test whether it's the tape mechanism that's making a lot of noise by
monitoring the audio with a good pair of headphones at a distance from
the camera, both with and without the tape r
lol!
On 26 Jan 2010, at 10:26, Adrian Miles wrote:
> sort of like a Steenbeck? :-)
>
> On 19/01/2010, at 10:16 AM, Richard Amirault wrote:
>
> > I would LOVE to edit with a touch screen. just seems like it'd be
> > more fun
> > and direct.
>
> cheers
> Adrian Miles
> adrian.mi...@rmit.edu.au
> Pr
orders like the Zi8 and the Flip.
Rupert
On 24 Jan 2010, at 23:54, Jay dedman wrote:
> > The iSight is about as good as it gets.
> > You'll have trouble importing hi-8 into your Mac, unless you want to
> > fork out for final cut pro and an analogue/digital converter box.
>
vious version of either: the Zi6
or the Flip SD, for slightly less.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 24 Jan 2010, at 21:56, Tom Dolan wrote:
> Hey Jay,
>
> I'm sittin here reading Steve's book when a thought occurs. My father-
> in-law gave me a Sharp video camera when we left
than Americans, and so have been reticent about vlogging -
and only tend to do it through corporate channels, not independently.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
average watch time for short-form is 1:15 min and the average for
long-form is 8:50 min.
People are watching more short-form than long-form video.
--
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the w
hate. I don't want MYSELF exposed to it, for god's sake.
Google need to sort this out NOW, since Chad Hurley and Steve Chen
clearly never gave a shit.
You can join the experiment by clicking on this link:
http://youtube.com/watch5?enable=1&next_url=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DjqxENMKaeCU
an
ditization of video production concerns me because it affects the
price and value of genuine creative filmmaking in this arena. But I
just wanted to put it out there for discussion and get some of the
facts clear.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 21 Jan 2010, at 04:12, Bohuš wrote:
>
>
an hour, shoot
an interview with the proprietor, shoot some B roll, cut a 1 minute
film, get paid $200.
I also know a local business who is selling 3 minute films to local
businesses for £1000-£1500 ($1700-2300)
Anyway, there it is
Rupert
for Dreamweaver.
And there's a Google XML sitemap generator plugin for Wordpress. I
bet there's an HTML sitemap generator plugin too.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 16 Jan 2010, at 14:25, Julian Seery Gude wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> I need to start producing larger quantit
sorry, i meant i *would* try to avoid using the location...
On 15 Jan 2010, at 21:05, Rupert Howe wrote:
> I wouldn't try to avoid using the location if it's dark and ugly.
> The combo of fluorescent ceiling lights and your studio lights may
> not be very useful for
separate digital recorder and then sync
up sound and picture in the edit.
Good luck!
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 15 Jan 2010, at 18:24, loretabirkus wrote:
> Hello videobloggers,
>
> I've been reading your posts and I feel so far behind in my
> knowledge :). But I hop
Congratulations!
And it's also available on Amazon.co.uk:
http://bit.ly/6PK1z8
More people than ever are starting out now.
Good luck with it :)
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 13 Jan 2010, at 01:01, Steve Garfield wrote:
> Hi,
> Just wanted to let you know that my book, Ge
age, they're more likely to buy separate
devices. That's why I say, a good quality small flat two-in-one
camera and camcorder is attractive.
I'm sure in time there'll be expensive smartphones that shoot HD, but
my guess is that "the masses" will still want a separate
eek on YouTube, there are music
videos, trailers, fails, sport, tv clips and amazing feats. All of
which are just recorded from TV or produced for MSM.
The only original stuff that regularly makes it to the top is
personality videoblogging. Ze Frank style. Fast cuts, high energy
Chrome supports both h264 and ogg theora for the video tag.
I think the browser upgrade thing is key to takeup of this. Too many
people still have older version browsers. But in the meantime,
hopefully it'll get used by more & more people doing cool interactive
experiments. I guess the ot
though. The
extra features like mic in don't mean much to them.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
On 12 Jan 2010, at 03:19, David Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Joly MacFie
> wrote:
> >
> > But this is my point, the flipHD fits in the pocket, costs $150
1 - 100 of 1188 matches
Mail list logo
