I tried to make the article as simple to understand as I possible could,
but it looks like I did not do it in your case. All I can tell you is read
it again.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I read your link, but all I see is a lot of jargon and
Rossi's reactor melts down all the time if he is not very careful. His main
problem is to keep the nickel from melting. He needs to keep the dynamic
NAE under control, in other words subcritical.
Its analogous to neutron production in a fission reactor. You don't want to
go supercritical in
Jojo, take in consideration that I want a friendly discussion with you not
a nervous and aggressive you are wrong,I am right one. You have right to
your opinions and I also can think what I can based on my knowledge,
prejudices and experience.I want to avoid scandal, it is counterproductive.
We
Sorry my friend, I find your writing style tedious and long-winded and very
difficult to understand. After reading, then rereading and then rereading it
again, I still have difficulty trying to understand your point. Please write
in short, to the point sentences.
Jojo
- Original
Sorry, mea culpa- we cannot communicate.
Peter
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry my friend, I find your writing style tedious and long-winded and
very difficult to understand. After reading, then rereading and then
rereading it again, I still
Culture clash? Or the difference of ages?
Terry you can decide alone -based on our parallel monologs
peter
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Culture clash? Or the difference of ages?
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Keep in mind that Rossi claims low energy radiation that could be from
positron-electron decay.
Remember both photons carry a spin quanta also with spin transfer. Both
linear and angular momentum is conserved with a transfer of “rest” mass into EM
fields of the photons. The transfer
A well recognize feature of LENR is the rapid or sometimes almost
instantaneous stabilization of radioactive elements.
This LENR mechanism is central to the way LENR can produce energy through
an extreme range from megawatts to milliwatts.
One of the toughest LENR riddles to answer is as
From: Bob Cook
Keep in mind that Rossi claims low energy radiation that could be from
positron-electron decay
Bob,
That claim was dropped years ago. Do you see it after mid-2013?
In fact, in an early test at Bologna, an expert was employed with a specialized
detector for
Both linier and angular momentum are conserved through the emission of
neutrinos as the meson decays to a negative muon. It is this muon that
catalyzes fusion of hydrogen.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Keep in mind that Rossi claims low energy
Linier
should read linear.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Both linier and angular momentum are conserved through the emission of
neutrinos as the meson decays to a negative muon. It is this muon that
catalyzes fusion of hydrogen.
On Sun, Aug 10,
This theory can be verified by the detection of a large increase in the
numbers of muon neutrinos exiting the Ni/H reactor.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A well recognize feature of LENR is the rapid or sometimes almost
instantaneous stabilization of
The theory of muon catalyzed fusion (MCF) is similar in concept to what
Piantelli proposes. But MCF will result in proton proton (PP) fusion. The
end reaction products of PP fusion is primarily light elements like boron
and beryllium. This has been seen in the ash assay results from DGT.
PP
My previous belief in magnetic formation of gluon/quark plasma formation
could not explain how such a high energy reaction could take place in very
low energy conditions like the Cravins ball.
The muon catalyzed fusion modal is a better fit for the low energy LENR
collection of dots.
On Sun,
Another pleasing idea is that there is a great energy gain mechanism at
play associated with muon catalized fusion. An investment of just a few MeV
of magnetic energy can produce an average fusion yield of 150 reactions per
emitted muon.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Axil Axil
Dave Lafleur
August 3rd, 2014 at 4:06 PM
If you are finding a magnetic byproduct as well that is certainly
interesting. You had no mention of magnetic materials. Care to comment?
Should I be surprised if you find a monopole mechanism? I apologize for my
questions with no (known?) answers but you
Hank Mills
August 6th, 2014 at 9:12 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853cpage=7#comment-985049
Dear Andrea,
Could you please tell us a little more about the electromagnetic fields
detected from your device? They have nothing to do with the upcoming report
which is only measuring
Ecco Liberation
August 7th, 2014 at 4:01 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853cpage=8#comment-985281
Dr. Rossi:
I figured that since a Hot Cat already is a thermal hazard under working
conditions (as its surface temperature peaks at several hundreds °C),
having electrical insulation
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Regarding one of Dave’s questions yesterday regarding spin interactions, it
has been my thought that orbital spin momentum can be changed into
intrinsic spin angular momentum without any violation of spin conservation.
Both linear and angular momentum are conserved through the emission of muon
neutrinos as the meson decays to a negative muon. It is this muon that
catalyzes fusion of hydrogen in the proton proton (PP) reaction.
Remember the conservation of Byron number.
Nature has specific rules for particle interactions and decays, and these
rules have been summarized in terms of conservation laws. One of the most
important of these is the conservation of baryon number. Each of the
baryons is assigned a baryon number
In the explanation of the Piantelli reaction , Piantelli has a hydrogen
negative ion catalyzing the fusion reaction. I wonder if all the
conservation laws are conserved in this reaction? I seems to me that an
object as complicated as a negative hydrogen ion would participate in a
reaction with all
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Piantelli needs to lay out how all the conservation laws are maintained in
his reaction.
It would also be nice if someone knowledgeable about hydrinos can explain
how an electron (spin=+/- 1/2) becomes a photon (spin=0) at
I seems to me that an object as complicated as a negative hydrogen ion
would participate in a reaction with all the conservation laws conserved.
should read
I seems to me that an object as complicated as a negative hydrogen ion
would find it very hard to participate in a reaction with all the
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
In a very strong magnetic field, the virtual meson jumps out of the
confinement box very often because the floor of the box is raised very
high. Many mesons are produced that eventually decay to muons that catalyze
hydrogen
Terry, do not ascribe to any other reason what can clearly be seen as an
ineffective wriring style. Peter may have some ideas, yet he communicates it
poorly. His sentences are disjointed, tangential, sloppy and liberally
interspersed with irrelevant highfalutin words intended to project an
Once the energy level of the magnetic field get up 140 MeV( the mass of the
Meson) the meson is no longer virtual and will not decay.
Less than 140 MeV, based on the energy/time uncertainty principle, the
decay time of the virtual meson is proportional to the kinetic energy
content of the mesons
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Once the energy level of the magnetic field get up 140 MeV( the mass of the
Meson) the meson is no longer virtual and will not decay.
Less than 140 MeV, based on the energy/time uncertainty principle, the
decay time of the
It is not clear how much magnetic energy is required to keep a LENR good
reaction going. The number of muon reactions that occur is proportional to
its decay time. A muon that has a long delay time because of the amount
of it kinetic energy content may catalyze many thousands of fusion
reactions
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A real muon may hang around for so long that it may produce a fusion
explosion.
Yes -- if this thought experiment in any way models reality, perhaps you
could obtain a critical density of muons and then have a problem on your
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 9 Aug 2014 19:23:52 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The economic and weight cost in increasing the strength of the structure to
supply a gravity equivalent to the spacecraft is huge.
You could also use a tether with a capsule on one end and either another capsule
on the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 10 Aug 2014 13:12:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
But when a magnetic field is applied to the proton, it adds some kinetic
energy to the quark dance. This pushes up the floor of the tunneling
confinement box. The degree in which this floor is raised is proportional
to
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 10 Aug 2014 13:12:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In a very strong magnetic field, the virtual meson jumps out of the
confinement box very often because the floor of the box is raised very
high. Many mesons are produced that eventually decay to muons that catalyze
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 10 Aug 2014 13:40:25 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The theory of muon catalyzed fusion (MCF) is similar in concept to what
Piantelli proposes. But MCF will result in proton proton (PP) fusion. The
end reaction products of PP fusion is primarily light elements like
Has it been established that the Cravens ball is LENR?
I believe Cravens himself, in the few weeks prior to the NI demo, in on record
here in Vortex saying that the time period of the NI demo was not long enough
to rule out some kind of chemical reaction, like hydrogenation.
Has Cravens come
Why do I get the feeling that Rossi reads Axil's posts here in Vortex. It
seems to me that many of the speculations of Axil serendipitously appear in the
Hotcat.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:41 AM
Subject:
I am just ahead of Rossi in the understanding of his reactor.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do I get the feeling that Rossi reads Axil's posts here in Vortex.
It seems to me that many of the speculations of Axil serendipitously appear
in the
Or a simpler explanation is he picks up some speculations here and applies it
to his reactors to give it some credibility.
The TIP1 report gave the hotcat some credibility. The continuing delay of the
TIP2 report, the continuing delay of the 1MW plant visits, plus the
hydrofusion fire sale
Are you sure your not the legendary Rossi haters MaryHugo or Joshua Cude
masquerading as that wonderful fellow JoJo.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Or a simpler explanation is he picks up some speculations here and
applies it to his reactors to
You're funny my friend.
I actually still have a little confidence in the hotcat, but not with the
mythical hyperion though.
Here are some developments and pronouncements of Rossi that really do not make
sense.
1. Solar-powered hotcat. Supposedly they are researching a way to use solar
Jojo, I think you are too fast in some of the conclusions.
1. I think you can take heat from the sun, directly.
2. I am sure thaot if you have free energy desalination is an easily
implemented technology that is econojical.
3. In ao way I agree with you. However, once you are in the middle of
Lennart, thanks for your comments.
Can you please elaborate on what you mean by a big hole. Do you mean the
maintenance expenditure would be expensive? If so, why do you think that would
be? Is it the corrosion of the materials? The labor cost in maintaining it?
The infrastrucuture cost?
* * * IMAGINE// re: John Lennon
Imagine that we are an OVOID Space-Time-Normal Universe within MANY. And
the MANY are all 'hung' in HyperSpeedDensity Dark Energy Aexospace.
AND Einstein Rosen Bridges are a given. Galaxies rotating around core-hub
singularities are a given. ..
IMAGINE that a
Lennart:
Why don't you just leave me alone? You started out on this thread
intending to provoke, so you've achieved provocation. Now that you don't
like the result you wanna backtrack. I get it. So then back track. Get
lost. Go and teach someone about your supposed strategic leadership
I agree.
Much of the time I do not agree with you. Much of the time I do not
understand your speculations. But your speculations are usually about as
good as anyone else's, and sometimes your speculations are brilliant.
Ed left this forum because there was too much speculatin' goin' on. Now
Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
However, being a sailor I know that whatever you put in the sea becomes al
big hole which you have to fill with money all the time. Is that not the
problem with your wave project. . . . .
People unfamiliar with ships and boats may not know what
If I were investing in Jojo's system I'd look at what is known about
comparable wave energy costs structures from actual experience and then
compare his projections with what is known to see where there are big
differences and why.
There may come a time when I will do that since I am very much
48 matches
Mail list logo
