effects were nil.
Bob
.
- Original Message -
*From:* H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, April 12, 2014 11:24 AM
*Subject:* [Vo]:OT: Stress alters children's genomes
Stress alters children's genomes
Poverty and unstable family environments
放射性廃棄物の無害化に道？ 三菱重、実用研究へ
(google translation)
The road to the detoxification of radioactive waste? Mitsubishi Heavy, to
practical research
2014/4/8 7:00
Use the deuterium, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries established the basic
technology of the element conversion to change the type of the element
Thanks for the tidbits...google's English translation of Japanese is not
clear.
Harry
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Another interesting tidbit: p. 1 says they were awarded a patent in Japan,
and a patent in Europe in 2013.
Page 1 also quotes the
Here is a contemporary Catholic assessment of Galileo's treatment.
http://www.catholic.com/tracts/the-galileo-controversy
Yes there are passages in the bible which could be interpreted as
supporting geocentrism.
The concluding remarks are interesting too:
As more recent science has shown, both
The University of Northern Iowa presents
LENR The Promise of clean and affordable Energy
March 10, 2014
Thomas A. Wind is an electrical engineer who has worked on many wind
generation projects but over the last two years has become really
interested in LENR.
Intro LENR Wind 3:34
BTW Frank Acland of e-catworld.com makes a brief appearance at the end of
the final video.
Harry
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:18 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The University of Northern Iowa presents
LENR The Promise of clean and affordable Energy
March 10, 2014
Thomas A. Wind
Nanoparticle trapped with laser light temporarily violates second law of
thermodynamics
Date: March 31, 2014
Objects with sizes in the nanometer range, such as the molecular building
blocks of living cells or nanotechnological devices, are continuously
exposed to random collisions with
Going from D to H should be endothermic.
Harry
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell
I will upload this version this morning and then go back to
yesterday's version and replace the Japanese text in some
Lennart and others interested in the commercial side of CF should watch
this (if you haven't already).
Steve Katinski and David Nagel are setting up an industry association for
advancing science and business in LANR Cold Fusion
at 8:55 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Going from D to H should be endothermic.
Exciting slides. I do not have the wherewithal to assess their
calorimetry, so I will assume it is accurate.
Here are some exothermic reactions involving generation of H from D:
- d + 60Ni → 61Ni
, the
Mizuno lab would be a small Fukushima…
*From:* torulf.gr...@bredband.net
I see you was quicker with neutron capture.
But the should look for He4 in the Ni metal.
Eric Walker wrote:
H Veeder wrote:
Going from D to H should be endothermic.
Exciting slides. I do not have
electromagnetic moat
Harry
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it is
to overcome for fusion events to occur. Perhaps we should consider it as
an electromagnetic barrier instead.
Cold fusion continues 25 years after announcement
By Ed Yeates
SALT LAKE CITY -- Twenty five years later, despite the skeptics, cold fusion
lingers.
Instead of what critics say was a premature, unsubstantiated, even arrogant
announcement from the University of Utah in 1989, Stanley Pons and
This article is about a current art exhibition called The Potato Eaters
Discover Cold Fusion. The Potato Eaters is a painting by Van Gogh. The
artist does not seem to know anything about the ongoing CF research. In his
paintings he contemplates the modernist utopian dream of cheap nuclear
power
Sorry, I accidentally inserted a space in the first link so it won't work.
This is the correct link
http://www.leftlion.co.uk/articles.cfm/title/the-potato-eaters-discover-cold-
fusion/id/6548#.Uy-m2vldWSq
Harry
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:55 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote
be warranted to eliminate the issue with loss of energy via
stirring the air around the rotating balls.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, March 22, 2014 10:56 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Hurricane balls, RAR
Suppose only 2% of the material in a catalytic converter has the NAE
capable of producing the putative excess heat. Since a catalytic converter
contains so much more potentially NAE than a familiar CF cell it is like
running a thousand CF cells at the same time of which only twenty produce
excess
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* H Veeder
...two steel ball bearings welded together ... are a metaphorical
cooper-pair, so to speak... raising another weird question: is there
something about spherical-pairing alone, which is special
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The continuing reports (on various alternative energy sites) about RAR
having recently demonstrated overunity in Brazil, are provocative... but
nothing more than rumor. Should we wait to explore the ramifications of
Magnetic field lines can be mapped using a compass. Iron-filings act like
miniature compass needles when sprinkled on paper covering a magnet.
Friction between the paper and an iron-filing ensures the iron-filing will
pivot like a compass needle. In zero-g the iron-filings would need to be
placed
the postulate
of the c constancy.
harry
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Mar 16, 2014 2:12 am
Subject: [Vo]:A relativistic Shrödinger's cat
From the appendix of the paper Stellar Aberration: the Contradiction
I wrote:
The paper assumes that Einstein's light clock (on which all of special
relativity is based) needs light to propagate as spherical wave, but I
think this assumption is unnecessary, so it means his relativistic
Shrödinger's
cat paradox is a non-sequitur. However, I believe the
From the appendix of the paper Stellar Aberration: the Contradiction
between
Einstein and Bradley
http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V14NO2PDF/V14N2RUS.pdf
Apeiron, Vol. 14, No 2, April 2007 111
© 2007 C. Roy Keys Inc. — http://redshift.vif.com
Appendix I: A relativistic Shrödinger’s cat
Of the six videos, this one is the most important one...
[ The Neo-classical Theory of Relativity ] Einstein's incorrect method to
synchronize clocks - case (A).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2qYCvw1UiElist=UUek3dPxFThe8FLl-ONbOeVw
...because it uses the same thought experiment described by
Sorry,
I should have included section 1 _and_ 2 from Einstein's paper. The second
section is added below.
Harry
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:39 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Of the six videos, this one is the most important one...
[ The Neo-classical Theory of Relativity ] Einstein's
John,
Forget these videos.
I just realized they are not a fair critique of special relativity because
they don't factor in the the postulate of the constancy of light speed.
Harry
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:53 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry,
I should have included section 1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:00 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Sat, 8 Mar 2014 17:48:13 -0500:
Hi,
That one is easy, it's flour power
:)
[snip]
Normally a charge imbalance arises when different materials are rubbed
together. (eg. amber and fur)
not exist in reality.
John
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:32 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Forget these videos.
I just realized they are not a fair critique of special relativity
because they don't factor in the the postulate of the constancy of light
speed.
Harry
On Wed, Mar
clock synchronization methods.
Harry
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Einstein's conception of simultaneity follows a procedure. The first step
in this procedure is to establish clock synchronization in one frame of
reference in isolation from
It has, no doubt, been worth the metaphysical barbarism of a few centuries
to possess modern science. Why did none of them see the tremendous
difficulties involved? Here, too, in light of our study, can there be any
doubt of the central reason? These founders of the philosophy of science
were
,
although wonderland would not be to bad--it might be a little like this
blog, which is a lot of fun.
Bob
Contents
- Original Message -
*From:* H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, March 09, 2014 10:53 PM
*Subject:* Re: Replications
I thought about the same issues too. If the principles of special
relativity are applicable then according to the principles it should be
possible to explain the effect equally well in either frame of reference.
However, I don't think it is possible.
I am wondering if an amplitude change in the
If this has any bearing on hydrogen loaded metal lattices then the
equivalent of the flour crack might be a region which was formerly filled
with hydrogen but which suddenly became devoid of hydrogen. In other words,
instead of cracks in the lattice being important to excess heat, it might
be the
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:53 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
Bob stated:
... we are again meeting in Alice's rabbit hole.
Wrong movie Bob, think Matrices!
The Blue pill or the Red pill?
;-)
-Mark
One could argue it is the same movie, since The Matrix makes some
The Chain Fountain, Explained (?)
Usually, physics research starts with a known problem. There are
surprises, of course, but they don’t often come from Internet videos, as
happened with the case of the mysterious chain fountain.
It started with Steve Mould, a host of science television shows in
pills , I always choose the
red ones, since they are easier to see when I drop them on the floor from
my pill box. I typically don't eat blue things.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, March 09, 2014 10:04 PM
This is what I described and illustrated from the frame of reference of the
train.
Section C shows the railway ties closer together.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxxczzEYA5C5cXNmZU1aUXNTRFE/edit?usp=sharing
Harry
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26462348
LENR has been talking about this for some time now.
quote from article Not every major earthquake is preceded by lightning.
And not all clear-sky lightning is followed by
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:45 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 8 Mar 2014 14:45:54 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26462348
LENR has been talking about this for some time now.
My take:-
When two grains rub against one
... theres gonna be sparks :_)
*From:* H Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2014 2:54 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:a length contraction paradox
Both frames are in sliding contact so it takes no time for the sprayer to
leave
If you can send gibberish faster than light than you can send information
faster than light.
for example:
gibberish-pause--gibberish
could be binary code for '5'
or morse code for 'K'
Harry
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
A signal can propagate in
Don't blame me Charlie... I can't see!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Itr0jcR0S4s
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
What you see in this video is how SR effects light rays coming into a
camera
or an eye.
SR says length contraction is literally length
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:a length contraction paradox
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:54 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Only by changing the thought experiment and incorporating that signal can
an observer in the rest frame declare the events to be non-synchronous in
his frame
Eric,
Some of these corner cases may have some bearing on cold fusion.
Harry
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
If you want to believe it is settled science as many do, you are
The geometry of spacetime is a clever way of encoding the postulates of
relativity theory, so of course spacetime will contain a parameter C. The
use of spacetime to describe experience depends on the scope of the
validity of the postulates.
Harry
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:42 PM, James Bowery
Terry,
Is there something in particular about this video that I should apply to my
example?
harry
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
This video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQnHTKZBTI4
provides observed effects of travel at light speed. It does so
John,
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:51 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
From a discussion in another group, I can say that the view of SR would be
that what is simultaneous in the train frame would not be viewed as
simultaneous in the track frame.
This would only be true if the
rotation of what?
harry
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:03 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry,
Is there something in particular about this video that I should apply to
my
example?
I think it shows
, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
rotation of what?
harry
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:03 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry,
Is there something in particular about this video that I should
I think it is time to remind people what this list is about.
http://amasci.com/weird/wvort.html
The Vortex-L list was originally created for discussions of professional
research into fluid vortex/cavitation devices which exhibit anomalous
energy effects (ie: the inventions of Schaeffer, Huffman,
I don't know.
harry
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:51 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
What about probability theory? Is that a clever way of encoding the
postulates of relativity theory?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:43 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The geometry of spacetime
. Why would you expect them to make two separate
observations? There is only one train moving past.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Mar 2, 2014 3:23 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a length contraction paradox
A length contraction paradox which doesn't vanish with further analysis.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxxczzEYA5C5cXNmZU1aUXNTRFE/edit?usp=sharing
harry
that is at rest relative to the tracks.
He would not see two separate spray events so I would suspect that he would
find the short version only.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Mar 2, 2014 1:10 pm
Subject: [Vo]:a length
AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Hello Harry,
The surveyor resides in a frame that is at rest relative to the tracks.
He would not see two separate spray events so I would suspect that he would
find the short version only.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder
John,
Unfortunately, upon further reflection these two thought experiments aren't
paradoxical, because they involve sending a signal over a non-zero
distance. Whenever such signaling is present a putative paradox vanishes
when analysed according to the principles of relativity theory . Therefore,
Terry,
Are you being funny?
With barcodes and scanners cashiers don't need to read to price labels.
He wants to devise a scanning method that identifies the type plastic
without the need for labels.
The optical properties of each plastic type would act like a natural bar
code.
Harry
On Thu,
can both measure C for the light?
Or what if you replace it with an electron at near .999 C, what would be
expected?
Obviously assume a vacuum is present.
Thanks for taking a look,
John
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:37 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The spatial relationships between
The linear example you describe below.
Harry
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
I very much appreciate your saying so Harry!
You give me faith in humans!
Which SR experiment are you saying I should illustrate?
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM, H
On second thought, I am not so sure about the linear example.
I will need to see it illustrated to be sure.
harry
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:14 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The linear example you describe below.
Harry
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:09 AM, John Berry berry.joh
Gold coins could be counterfeited, so people would bite them to see if they
were real.
What is the byte test for bitcoins? ;-)
harry
It is a matter of values rather than beliefs.
If people stopped valuing flowers, the tulip bulb would cease to have value.
Likewise if people stopped valuing computer science, bit coins would cease
to have value.
Harry
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The spatial relationships between the discs and clocks is not clear.
Can you draw a diagram of the experiment?
harry
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:34 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
For brevity, I will explain it in sentence. and the possible results in a
few more, But the longer
Might the mechanical telephone will make a comeback?
Probably not since all communication seems to be going wireless these days.
But who knows...
Pulsion Telephone Company certificate and ad from 1889
http://scripophily.net/imputesecoma.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin_can_telephone
For a
Do you know about the Earth's natural Schumann Resonance? There is a theory
that life evolved so as to become adapted to it and our EM broadcasts are
interfering with this adaptation.
Harry
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:48 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't say cell phones were
:-)
You never know what people will find useful.
Harry
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:07 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks H Veeder. These characters do text in Kindle while the font symbol
does not. I updated my e book with these symbols and removed words like
omega.
Frank
θ ω ε
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:25 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Imagine two friends with synchronized watches. One friend boards a train
and zips away for a time at near c and then gets off and walks back to his
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:10 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Correction:
If the result of the magnetic force being seen to act on one frame as
expected from the flux in another leads to a dramatic and non-trivial
paradox, it is going to be harder to keep up the delusion that
be no problem since this type of structure has been proven to
generate a force. So, if taken to the extreme, is there a reason that a
small segment along the wire behaves in a different manner?
Thanks Harry,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
they meet up they should however find
their time quite different from that read on a clock at their stationary
meeting place.
*From:* H Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2014 2:06 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Time Dilation
As Dave has mentioned, Einstein's reason for postulating the constancy of c
was partly motivated by his examination of the laws of electrodynamics.
Here is the introduction to his paper ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING
BODIES. You can see he is bothered by a lack of symmetry in the laws but a
John,
Eric is right about the constancy of c being a *postulate* from which
time-dilation and length contraction are derived.
However, that doesn't discount your thought experiments as a way of probing
the coherence of SR.
Imagine two friends with synchronized watches. One friend boards a train
Dramatic!
As alternate way of revealing the paradox, I imagined the two charged balls
connected by a spring which counter balances the force of repulsion.
In the reference frame where the balls are moving, a magnetic force would
cause the spring to become shorter. Paradoxically, in the frame of
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 16, 2014 11:41 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent model of Coulomb's law
What is the source of the magnetism?
Harry
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:24 PM, David Roberson dlrober
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 9:44 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Once I made a calculation of the attraction between two charged particles
that are moving together at a constant velocity relative to my frame of
reference. I was pleasantly surprised to find that as the velocity of the
What is the source of the magnetism?
Harry
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:24 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Sorry, I realize that my wording was flawed. I mean that the two
particles are moving in parallel at the same velocity.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder
Oh you used this equation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot%E2%80%93Savart_law#Point_charge_at_constant_velocity
I was only familiar with the force which arises between two parallel
uniform currents.
This is interesting.
harry
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:41 PM, H Veeder hveeder
coils)
*From:* David Roberson
Sorry, I realize that my wording was flawed. I mean that the two
particles are moving in parallel at the same velocity.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder
David Roberson wrote:
Once I made a calculation of the attraction between two
Experiments like these dig up old debates about the nature of matter which
mainstream physics since the time of Newton keeps burying.
Harry
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:50 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I'm not sure that
Burchells, and it may well be that this might be a better way of
modelling it in some circumstances, but is his extra velocity term for the
colomb attraction not just something that we are familiar with but under a
different guise?
Nigel
On 15/02/2014 07:37, H Veeder wrote:
He is certainly
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:55 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Nigel,
You are correct. I failed to remember that each charge sees a changing
electric field due to the motion of the other charge, and if the electric
field is changing this generates a changing magnetic field which
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Using incandescent lights is economic lunacy. Even with cold fusion it
would be crazy, especially in commercial apps.
That makes sense. I
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:30 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Feb 2014 18:21:30 -0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Indeed, in the Coulomb gauge, the electrical field propagates with an
infinite speed. This is known for over a century. But this ignores what
happens
This is a test to see if the greek letters I have copied and pasted into
this message are preserved as they pass through the mail programs.
The characters come from this site
http://greek.typeit.org/
θ ω ε ρ τ ψ υ ι ο π α σ δ φ γ η ς κ λ ζ χ ξ ω β ν μ
Θ Ω Ε Ρ Τ Ψ Υ Ι Ο Π Α Σ Δ Φ Γ Η ς Κ Λ Ζ
Harry wrote:
Fair enough, but may be Ed's starting point is necessary for
your reversible proton fusion. Think of it as electron mediated reversible
proton fusion.
Jones wrote:
Astute observation. It is all a matter of probability.
But note in the prior post, the premise was stated, and
Here is a November 2012 paper about an experiment which tentatively shows
that electric fields seem to propagates rigidly, i.e. with infinite speed.
Although it hasn't been published in a peer reviewed journal yet, given the
fact that the observation challenges Special Relatively, one would have
BTW, I learned about this experiment while reading about Coulomb's law on
wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law#Tentative_evidence_of_infinite_speed_of_propagation
Harry
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 1:44 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a November 2012 paper about
if this is so, it is very possible that gravity could be explained
this way.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:09 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery and other vortex members,
Today I learned about the the work of Bernard Burchell.
He argues for a velocity dependent version of coulomb's
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is one complication that does not fall out of these various single
track theories of LENR fusion. That complication is the Fission/Fusion
reaction. What causes many protons to fuse with a high Z element like
nickel?
James Bowery and other vortex members,
Today I learned about the the work of Bernard Burchell.
He argues for a velocity dependent version of coulomb's law*
In his model the coloumb force between two like charges increases when the
charges are moving together and decreases when they are moving
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
BTW - take an electron and proton at rest, that system has a mass of 0.511
+ 938.272 = 938.8 MeV/c^2. That is the total mass available to that system.
It cannot increase above that level unless substantial energy comes
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:46 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0611167.pdf
I draw your attention, in particular to the equation:
*p* = µ*v* + q*A*
This is old and accepted physics. However, the q*A* term is addition to
Newton's 2nd law, is it not?
--
VERTICAL TURBINES, PACKED TIGHT, BOOST POWER
http://www.earthtechling.com/2011/07/vertical-turbines-packed-tight-boost-power/
--
The caveat is that high wind speed is still a problem for all egg beaters.
Harry
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
The most elegant answer begins with the obvious assertion that there are
no
gammas ab initio, which means that no reaction of the kind which your
theory
proposes
Is the expression beyond the carnot limit the genteel way of stating a
violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
Harry
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Yet another perspective for the same anomalous environment?
:* David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Monday, February 10, 2014 6:19 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Energy and momentum / was RAR
Your corollary would be an excellent addition to my discussion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Note there could be a problem with heat between nanors interfering with
one another. Perhaps the devices only work well at near ambient
temperature.
Just like people.
Harry
*claps*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyu82WG_edM
Harry
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:37 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temporary/Quack.wmv
Frank Z
-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Feb 11, 2014 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy and momentum / was RAR
I think the rules imply it is true for both linear and angular momentum.
No amount of the total momentum of a system can be converted
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:17 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
OK. Energy is proportional to velocity squared. If you double the
velocity, you have four times as much energy as in the first case. Also
the direction of the motion is not important. For example, a ball moving
to
301 - 400 of 599 matches
Mail list logo
