If the 2.8328 fermi mentioned in the paper is multiplied by the inverse
of alpha, the fine structure constant (alpha =1/137.035999), then you
get the radius of Randell Mills' TSO (Transition State Orbitsphere)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624
the radius of
And the power of that incandescent spectrum could be anomalous and could be
from the creation of Mills' hydrinos. I wanted to investigate hydrogen
gas + calcium oxide "limelight" but ran out of time and money 2 years ago.
I got one data point from my calorimeter that didn't show any excess heat
at
Intravenous vitamin C and steroids (specifically Methylprednisolone)
works well on Covid-19. There is a bunch of highly respected doctors
(including pulmonologists) trying to get the word out without much luck.
The treatment has to be started as soon as breathing problems develop.
see here:
ht
ocument/d/16dP_SmSP8SuQbZ7p9eGoCwf1vwJKh7KPL7NAYv7j13o/edit
>
> Really nice insight by Alan.
>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
but the electronic charge
> distribution had a direct impact on the computed capacitance of the
> structure, so there was a reasonable test one could make to determine if
> the formulation was correct. Not so easy in the case of nuclear field
> distribution. How do you think the re
Does anyone have access to electrostatics software package and have time to
do a finite element analysis on a 3-D part to determine the electrostatic
field potential? Specifically the JPEG in the link below shows a grouping
of protons and neutrons. I mainly need to figure out which protons have the
do not see it, so if you tell me which
> is the right curve we can discuss about it.
>
> 2015-01-12 22:58 GMT+01:00 Jeff Driscoll :
>
>> Jed is correct, when the pump is turned on and everything reaches steady
>> state, (using his example) the pump is putting in 4 watts of
rue because
> nowhere do we see a 6°C elevation above ambient, but let us pretend it is
> true.) In that case, all of the excess heat calculations must begin at a
> baseline 6°C above ambient, because the pump is always left on. Therefore
> this has absolutely no impact on the excess heat measurement.
>
> - Jed
>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
l the heat radiating. Many
>> pumps have fans that blow the hot air out of the motor. With a good pump,
>> the water is at the other end away from the motor, and very little heat
>> transfers to it.
>>
>>
>>
>>>This was more than enough to raise the temperature without any
>>> reactor heat source given the recorded decrease of 1.7 watts when nothing
>>> was running or reacting.
>>>
>>
>> Suppose this is true. Suppose it was 1.7 W and suppose that raises the
>> temperature by 4 deg C. Pick any temperature rise you like: suppose it
>> raises the temperature by 10 deg C, or 20 deg C. Here is the point, which I
>> have made again and again:
>>
>> THE TEMPERATURE WAS ALREADY that much higher when the test began. The
>> pump runs all the time. Using this method we measure from that starting
>> baseline temperature up to the terminal temperature of the test. The pump
>> heat -- *however much there is* -- is already included in the baseline.
>> Therefore we never include it in excess heat.
>>
>> You need to answer these points if you want to have a serious
>> discussion.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
a mystery why observers here on vortex avoid connecting real
> observation in another field with theory - to explain LENR as the energetic
> creation of dark matter, and not a nuclear reaction. In the eyes of the
> mainstream, if the 3.56 keV x-ray is verified in experiment, the field
ew/5862
>
> Andre's:
> http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/5789
>
> Let me know what you think if you read it.
>
> Lane
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
gt; https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2015/01/the-scientific-institution-is-biased-against-shortcuts-to-the-production-of-practical-technology.php
>
> it match kuhn vision too.
> anomalies are ignored or rationalized until there is a perfect theory to
> explain all.
>
> reality is
here are two links for MHD, magnetohydrodynamics
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/maspec.html#c5
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MHD_generator
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Jeff Driscoll wrote:
> I haven't seen that picture but based on earlier stuff I've seen
ob
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Nigel Dyer wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.blacklightpower.com/whats-new/
>>
>>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
ty in phase space with circular cycles of a trapped
>>> photon representing the usual eigenstates. The Maxwell quanta hbar(c)
>>> becomes a classical angular momentum quanta in phase space with quantum
>>> number 137 attached.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, gotcha. Thank you. Hence also the electron "becoming a photon" as
>> it approaches the lowest level.
>>
>> Now we have to decide whether we can live with a series { 1/2, 1/3,
>> 1/4, ..., 1/136, alpha(N) }. (Or something like that.)
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
s into that
> category. Reminds me of the announcement by CERN of the neutrino speed
> exceeding that of light which was retracted once a hardware problem was
> resolved.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jeff Driscoll
> To: vortex-l
> Sen
quanta hbar(c) becomes a
>> classical angular momentum quanta in phase space with quantum number 137
>> attached.
>>
>
> Ah, gotcha. Thank you. Hence also the electron "becoming a photon" as
> it approaches the lowest level.
>
> Now we have to decide w
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:47 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Jeff Driscoll says:
>
> |smaller fractions than 1/137.0359 are not possible because electron
> would be going faster than light
> |
>
> Special Relativity explains the electron speed of light limit in a
> somewha
ly close to the physical constant and
> assumed equal? I have to ask why 1/138 is not a valid value as well.
>
> I am not convinced that Mills' theory is correct in any way, but am
> speculating about some interesting characteristics that may be possible if
> it has validity.
ented
> this kludge.
>
>
>
> Yes we have talked about the “invented neutrino” proving itself later, but
> that cannot be a good analogy to this situation.
>
>
>
> Can anyone produce an opinion to the contrary by a spectroscopy expert who
> is not employed by BLP?
>
>
>
> Jones
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
t there is a some extra conditions for the solutions to be physical, that
> is missing that relates to the integrability conditions for the spinors.
>
> Also if there any serious issues with his math I would like to know, else
> he deserves respect, with or without the hydrino.
>
> /Stefan
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
gnificance
> that we seek, so now I plan to go onto your site and look at the equations
> in more detail.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Driscoll
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 3:08 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills's theory
>
t; There are interesting implications if he does not need to.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Driscoll
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 2:17 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills's theory
>
> you have 3 significant digits for 1/13
g physics:
>>
>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9707020.pdf
>>
>> wherein he associates the four levels of the combinatorial hierarchy with
>> the four scale constants for the superstrong, strong, electroweak and
>> gravitational interactions respectively
>>
>>
>&g
I tried to summarize a few reasons why I believe Randell Mills's theory of
the atom.
==
For decades, physicists have struggled with how to interpret the fine
structure constant, alpha = 1/137.035999
Physicist Richard Feynman said this decades ago: “It
er above instead of existing
> as a single moving point. If I recall correctly, those models do not
> attempt to track the position of the electron in time. That should be
> adequate provided the position of the electron is truly a probability
> function.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
as being anything other than a generalization, meaning nothing.
>
>
>
> If it were not for the fine study by Thermacore, Mills could probably get
> away with this kind of intellectual dishonesty. He is looking more and more
> like a charlatan and this upcoming demo will be an insu
t; In fact, I’ve been working on an alternative explanation for the 55 eV
> signal - involving the diproton reaction, (Reversible Proton Fusion) which
> will be presented at some point.
>
> It explains why this signature is NOT a precise Rydberg value, even though
> it is close - and why the signal derives from the XPS device itself (in its
> interaction with retained protons) – but the conclusion is that this signal
> is not derived from retained hydrinos being “reinflated.”
>
> Jones
>
>
>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
hed Hydrino energy levels.
> >> The author of the paper on IRH, that has previously been mentioned on
> this
> >> list,
> >> claims that it has only one level, whereas the Hydrino has over a
> hundred.
> >>
> >> >Don't you mean to say that Rydberg clusters don't have multiple energy
> >> >
>>> >
>>> >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:38:39 -0500:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >> [snip]
>>> >>
>>> >> I meant individual atoms, and I realize that clusters would probably
>>> have
>>> >> somewhat different energy levels, however it would be very
>>> coincidental if
>>> >> these
>>> >> exactly matched Hydrino energy levels.
>>> >> The author of the paper on IRH, that has previously been mentioned on
>>> this
>>> >> list,
>>> >> claims that it has only one level, whereas the Hydrino has over a
>>> hundred.
>>> >>
>>> >> >Don't you mean to say that Rydberg clusters don't have multiple
>>> energy
>>> >> >levels and characteristic transition energies, which are seen in
>>> Hydrino
>>> >> >experiments?
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:08 PM, wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:26:06
>>> -0500:
>>> >> >> Hi,
>>> >> >> >How does Mills theory distinguish been orbitals in a atom verses
>>> >> orbitals
>>> >> >> >in small atomic Rydberg cluster of 10 atoms or less. I say the
>>> Mills
>>> >> >> >experiments can't.
>>> >> >> [snip]
>>> >> >> Rydberg atoms don't have multiple energy levels and characteristic
>>> >> >> transition
>>> >> >> energies, which are seen in Hydrino experiments.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Regards,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Robin van Spaandonk
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Robin van Spaandonk
>>> >>
>>> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Robin van Spaandonk
>>>
>>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
>>> Department.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
>>> Department.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
>>> Department.
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
no, won't refract, just gravitationally bend
here is a better link for dark matter:
http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2013/06/26/does-dark-matter-really-exist/
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:21 PM, H Veeder wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jeff Driscoll wrote:
make
> this otherwise, it would be interesting to know. (I've already mentioned
> spectrographic analysis as one possibility.)
>
> Eric
>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
>
> >> >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:26:06 -0500:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >How does Mills theory distinguish been orbitals in a atom verses
> >> orbitals
> >> >> >in small atomic Rydberg cluster of 10 atoms or less. I say the Mills
> >> >> >experiments can't.
> >> >> [snip]
> >> >> Rydberg atoms don't have multiple energy levels and characteristic
> >> >> transition
> >> >> energies, which are seen in Hydrino experiments.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >>
> >> >> Robin van Spaandonk
> >> >>
> >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Robin van Spaandonk
> >>
> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
> >>
> >>
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
>
>
> This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
> Department.
>
>
>
> This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
> Department.
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
Any direction
> that is probed in the far field region will be completely balanced at every
> point in space as long as an extremely large number are looping. This
> effect has one hole in it which is a steady DC magnetic field. The DC
> field can be very complex in 3 dimensional spatial
>
>> http://zhydrogen.com/?page_id=620
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:37:50 AM UTC-5, peter...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> This, this time seems to be remarkable progress-
>>> if true:
>>>
>>> http://www.financialpost.com/markets/news/BlackLight+Power+
>>> Announces+Game+Changing+Achievement+Generation+
>>> Millions/9384649/story.html
>>>
>>> Let's see- Mike Carrell remained BLP's faithful supporter.
>>> Not LENR, but energy
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Peter Gluck
>>> Cluj, Romania
>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>>>
>>
>
--
Jeff Driscoll
617-290-1998
y 14, 2014 10:37:50 AM UTC-5, peter...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> This, this time seems to be remarkable progress-
>>> if true:
>>>
>>> http://www.financialpost.com/markets/news/BlackLight+Power+
>>> Announces+Game+Changing+Achievement+Generation+
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Looks like you have been imbibing on the BLP kool-aid...
> comments interspersed below...
>
> Do you glow-in-the-dark, yet? :-)
>
>
>
>
> RPR then releases the "hotter" UV photon which can create another catalytic
> hole (when slightly downshifted) especially in oxygen preferentially. A
> limited chain reaction, mediated by UV photons, is the result.
>
> In short, this hybridized version provides a more complete picture than
> Mi
xvxv ZZzAssOc zz xxsex CT vacs cv Mv
Sent from my HTC smartphone on the Now Network from Sprint!
- Reply message -
From: "Axil Axil"
To: "vortex-l"
Subject: [Vo]:What the heck is LENR+, anyway?
Date: Thu, Aug 22, 2013 11:10 pm
Wow, Jed Rothwell has awakened from a quarter century of slu
This may not be a factor in the Celani replication experiment where
pressures are high (greater than 1 atmosphere correct??), but at low
pressures, the thermal conductivity of hydrogen gas is hugely impacted
by small amounts of a heavier molecule gas that is added - such as
Argon or nitrogen. I
Defkalion is moving to Canada. Can someone comment on something I
heard which is western Canada (such as Alberta and Vancouver) have
weak laws that make running scams and frauds easier?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
> Rossi is right about one thing; the clowns are just wait
Jaro has myopic tunnel vision (mixed metaphor?) with thoughts of a
warmer climate making more farmland or making cold areas more
hospitable to humans.
Below is a list of the disadvantages of global warming that I found on
a website. Any advantages from global warming are far outweighed by
these
after some thinking I realized I made a few wrong statements - see below
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:18 AM, David Roberson wrote:
> I think the explanation offered by Jeff is pretty good. As long as a
> significant electric field is within the cell conductive region charged ions
> will be driven b
Here are my two cents from reading up on dielectrics:
With the 6000 V capacitor isolated from the electrolyte by the
plastic, the electrolyte acts as a dielectric which reduces the E
field in the electrolyte almost to zero in the middle but increases
the the capacitance of the capacitor.
If ther
hould have initial results
in 4 months or less.
Jeff
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> Is that an anonymous hearsay source or do you actually have a quotable
> source?
>
>
> 2012/6/7 Jeff Driscoll
>>
>> I heard of one group that went to Defkalion
I heard of one group that went to Defkalion with rich investors and
Defkalion either wouldn't or couldn't show a definitive test. This
group said that Defkalion had poor experiments, poor equipment and
dumb scientists running it.
Why not look more closely at Blacklight Power? They have top notc
>
>
> below is a partial transcript of Shelby Brewer speaking at some presentation:
>
> http://seekingalpha.com/article/27312-commodore-applied-technologies-red-chip-conference-presentation-transcript
>
> " The technology side, we have a process called Solva
I put together a Powerpoint presentation on Randell Mills theory and
Blacklight Power. Mills's theory involves fractional state hydrogen -
also known as hydrinos. There is a link to the presentation on the
home page of my website and also below:
home page:
http://zhydrogen.com
link to pdf prese
In anyone's opinion (especially Jed), and in order of "convincingness"
for an investor that wants to invest, which should be the most
convincing Rossi tests (include the date to reduce confusion)?
Also, are there any competent scientists who have *carefully* looked
at any Defkalion tests and put t
he needs a gullible investor, or a fraudulent investor wanting to find
a bigger gullible investor,
he's probably learned the game with his previous fraudulent work
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> I read through all of this - and still do not understand how Rossi will get
> ri
Mills says the hydrogen atom has 1 unit of angular momentum m*v*r at
all orbit states from n = 1/137.0599 to n = infiity
though around the spin axis, it has 1/2 unit of angular momentum,
with the other 1/2 unit of the angular momentum spread out on other
axis.
this is why the hydrogen atom is sa
You can learn more about Randell Mills's (of Blacklight Power) theory
on my website - in particular I'm including some text from it as shown
below which can also be seen at this link:
http://zhydrogen.com/?page_id=350/#FineStrucPart2-rmenu
My goal from the website was to explain some of the basic
Regarding ultra dense deuterium, George Miley and Leif Holmlid:
In Rydberg matter:
- the electrons and protons are inverted in terms of a metal (though
not clear what this means)
- the distance between nuclei in the planar Rydberg matter made from
deuterium is on the order of 150 picometers. Th
A fraudster (i.e. Rossi) could have yanked on that thermocouple just before
opening up the insulation wrapping making it fraudulently appear that the
thermocouple was close to the exit of the secondary cooling water when in
fact it was close to the hot steam input side of that brass manifold during
Can someone tell me where the exit water themocouple was located? It
meausured a delta T of zero C to approx 9 C during the test.
Is there a photo?
Could it have been under the influence of an electic heater nearby?
Why didn't Rossi make a big tank of hot water? 120 MJ would heat 150
gallons o
(fraudulently)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
> "...it can condense into microscopic droplets while giving up latent heat
> (heat of vaporization)"
>
> Agreed, and where does that released latent heat GO?
>
> -Mark
>
>
>
it leaves the surface as a gaseous form but then it can condense into
microscopic droplets while giving up latent heat (heat of
vaporization)
what thermodynamic point was incorrect?
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
>> St
>
>>
>> Nor does the manufacturer's brochure assert that steam quality can be
>> measured with their equipment . . .
>
> It said the equipment measures enthalpy. You can't do that unless you know
> the quality of the steam. It also said that the instrument measures by mass,
> not volume.
> - Jed
>
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jeff Driscoll wrote:
>
>>
>> >> 2. Rossi's assertions of that steam quality can be measured with a
>> >> Relative Humidity meter (it can't).
>> >
>> > Yes, it can.
>>
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jeff Driscoll wrote:
>>
>> Rossi has not done a definitive test. I don't trust him on his input
>> mass flow rate (2 grams per second) . . .
>
> You don't trust that he can read a digital weig
Rossi has not done a definitive test. I don't trust him on his input
mass flow rate (2 grams per second) or whether or not it was turned
to vapor or just spurted out as liquid slugs of water into the drain.
Levi has a lot to gain monetarily so I don't trust his high flow rate
test (where there w
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Driscoll wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 PM, wrote:
>> > In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
>> > Hi,
>
> Jeff,
>
> thermometer was calibrated and unlike common belief, boiling point was not
> 100 degrees, but 99.7°C ± 0.1.
So then you are relying on Rossi's calibration being accurate to
within +/- .5 C and believing Rossi who comes across as a fraud
(hiding the evidence down the drain, terrible ch
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>>I was talking about running it above boiling, but way below the level needed
>>to boil it all. Different thing. And it's easy. The power can range within a
>>factor of
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
>
> First, here is my conclusion based on the methodology and resoning below:
>
> "If certain conditions are present, one can reduce this to a mass-in, mass
> out problem, and you
> don't need to measure the volume of steam exiting in order to
The discussion related to Galantini using the wrong instrument to
measure steam quality in Rossi's experiment seems to be slowing down.
But here are details on how a relative humidity sensor works (as
others have also mentioned).
It uses an extremely thin plastic (one manufacturer uses a one micr
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
>
> More frustration than confidence! Jeff kept on insisting that there is no
> documentation that the
> instrument (actually sensor) can measure the liquid content of steam, to
> which I AGREED, but I
> requested twice that he read my propos
It would take a long time for water to evaporate out of any crevices,
so the liquid would stay around a long time, any probe measuring
steam quality has to do it from below 100 C and above 100 C.
but this is all moot.
Galantini used the wrong instrument.
I can't find the amount of grams per kg
27;t give the mass of water as vapor because it only works
for measuring the mass of water of vapor in AIR.
NOT in a mixture of vapor and microscopic water DROPLETS
>
> Its ALGEBRA-I level math...
>
> -Mark
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Driscoll [mailto:hcarb
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Mark Iverson wrote:
>
>>
>> The only way to guage whether the steam flow is adequate is at the outlet
>> of the chimney, NOT at the
>> end of a 10 foot hose that has condensation going on inside it. . . .
>
> That is correct.
>
>>
>> I believ
e mass of liquid
> water using simple algebra... One can calulate the mixing ratio from the
> humidity.
>
> I agree that this is not the most desirable method, but is valid, unless
> you're claiming that they
> are violating the conservation of mass.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> Yes, you're on the right track... see my posting at 6/21 at 9:04pm.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg48242.html
>
> I would bet that Galantini is making an indirect measurement of the liquid
> water content as explained in my posting.
>
> -Mark
no, there is no way to make an
>
> Okay, Krivit got a mail from Galantini:
> http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/20/galantini-sends-e-mail-about-rossi-steam-measurements-today/
>
> Galantini wrote:
>
>> Good morning, on the request made to me today, as I have repeatedly
>> confirmed to me that many people have requested in th
Abd is right,
I've been trying to say multiple times that the meter measures
humidity of air up to 98% humidity. The probe can go to 150 C without
being broken but that does not mean that it can measure accurately up
to 150 C.
But that's for *air* anyway. We want to know the steam quality. This
On Steve Krivit's blog:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/16/preliminary-report-of-interviews-with-e-cat-trio-rossi-focardi-and-levi/
Steve writes:
"On my request Tuesday, Rossi removed the hose from the drain.
Before doing so, he carefully lifted the last meter of the hose above
the heig
experts again regarding
this RH meter. I'm guessing they might not be so sure that the probe is
appropriate.
I'm absolutely certain that the RH probe is not giving *any* useful
information on the steam quality.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jeff Dr
you wrote "People who understand these meters tell me it is not a joke at
all. The meter with that probe is fine for that purpose. There would not be
much point to making an RH meter probe is intended for a range of
temperature up to 300°C that does not work with steam."
My guess (without digging
Gaseous water vapor has 537 times more energy than liquid water droplets on
a gram for gram comparison (you wrote 20 times)
Jed, you wrote "If he had used the RH meter used previously, the skeptics
would not have believed him any case, even though various experts has said
that meter is fine for th
a 55 gallon water tank and then measure
> the temperature rise of the water as *everyone* has been suggesting?”
>
>
>
> Jones
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* noone noone
>
>
>
> Be careful with the fraud word. You may have to live with those words
> forever, af
So they are again using a crappy temperature probe to figure out steam
quality (dry versus wet steam)?
This is so bogus.
If the boiling water has a back pressure of 0.6 psi, the temperature will be
raised by 1 degree C
see here:
http://www.broadleyjames.com/FAQ-text/102-faq.html
Is this the th
As far as I can see, they are still making mistakes by using a humidity
meter to test for the mass fraction of vapor to liquid water - also known as
"steam quality
from their technical paper:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n
This link describes the difficulties of burning boron (forms molten layer
that shields the remaining boron from oxygen) and says that by adding some
percentage of magnesium the burning issues are better.
http://www.afsbirsttr.com/Library/Documents/Innovation-050610-MACHI-OSD05-T001.pdf
Also the sa
(powdered aluminum and iron oxide) at 18.4
MJ/liter would last 19 minutes when producing 16 kW from 1 liter of
material.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jeff Driscoll wrote:
> Alan's website seems to have mistakes -
>
> http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v2.php
>
> http://e
Alan's website seems to have mistakes -
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v2.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density
Alan does calculations assuming that Rossi's 1 liter reactor (as described
by professor Levi) was filled with some type of chemical that could heat the
water. Suppose
Most likely there is some secret ingredient and / or method that Rossi uses
that we don't know. What are the chances that you will replicate it? How
about trying to reproduce Mills / BLP experiment ? The ingredients are
listed in his paper and Mills told me that it works every time. He steered
m
don't (or you may not want to) click on that tinyurl website from Horace's
email,
it might have trojans or virus,
(I'm not referring to his website in his signature, just the tinyurl one
regarding shoes)
when I clicked on it, my virus software said that a .exe file was
communicating with outsid
So, reiterating what others are saying in reply to my email:
The HD37AB1347 device with the HP474AC probe is designed to measure air with
0% to 100% humidity. It is not designed to measure pure water vapor with
tiny liquid droplets (including zero liquid droplets) in it.
It isn't even close - t
umidity effects which
should have been observed at the demo.
This is from an associate LENR researcher - Jeff Morriss, in response to the
other issues on steam/vapor raised by Jeff Driscoll and Peter van Noorden,
which so far do not have convincing answers.
Jeff M. wrote:
Nagel states that 150 grams
should have been observed at the demo.
>
> This is from an associate LENR researcher - Jeff Morriss, in response to
> the other issues on steam/vapor raised by Jeff Driscoll and Peter van
> Noorden, which so far do not have convincing answers.
>
>
>
> Nagel states that 150
gh one would still notice a turbulence of warm and cold
> airflow in the room.
>
> Peter
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Jeff Driscoll
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:08 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Nagel: Check List for LENR Valida
ces.com/articles/2003/378.html?page=full
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jeff Driscoll wrote:
>
>>
>> How can you use an indoor air quality meter (listed in Jed's email) to
>> measure the dryness of the steam? (you can't)
>>
&g
As was mentioned by others, they should Insulate the black hose and drop it
into 30 gallons of room temperature water and measure the temperature rise
of the water.
How can you use an indoor air quality meter (listed in Jed's email) to
measure the dryness of the steam? (you can't)
How was the dr
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
> How do we know that all the water ( 8.8 l) evaporated?
>
> That's what the RH meter is for. (May have answered already.)
>
> This is another example of the disastrous consequences of depending on a
> "black b
This email questions whether or not the sensor described in Rossi's setup
can measure the dryness of the steam and whether or not there was a double
check on the "steam" calorimetry by using the amount of cooling water along
with the change in temperature of the cooling water to calculate energy.
I should add that I noticed the streaming GUTCP book on BLP's "What's new"
web page - I'm not connected with BLP or anything. I find the theory
interesting because it is so elegant - no uncertaincy principle and no
playing dice with the Universe.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011
Blacklight Power and Randell Mills GUTCP (Grand Unified Theory of Classical
Physics) July 2010 edition is available by streaming or full pdf download.
Streaming version makes it easy to just take a quick look without having to
download 38 Megabytes of the book and then storing it somewhere on your
ing out below.
Jeff
=====
Jeff Driscoll 12/14/2010
Boston, MA
http://www.waterarc.com
Dear Sirs,
I am looking for funding to replicate an experiment done by a company that
may have cracked the puzzle of “Cold Fusion.” Cold Fusion is pot
dy Mills "exclusive" group, and it is moderated. (Ardent
>skeptics are not welcome.)
>It's possible you might find a sympathetic ear here, or perhaps
>someone on the list could point you in an opportunistic direction.
>Regards
>Steven Vincent Johnson
>www.OrionWorks.c
and I could try more variations if I had
funding. My website describes how I plan to do the experiment.
I’m including an email below that I plan to send to angel investors.
===
Jeff Driscoll
hcarb...@gmail.com
Boston, MA
http
The show "Brink" on the Science Discovery channel did a short 6 minute
**positive** piece on Cold Fusion 2 weeks ago.
video here:
http://science.discovery.com/videos/brink-news-evidence-of-nuclear-fusion.html
http://science.discovery.com/
>From Brink's website:
Everything
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
