@Jones Beene, Yup I agree I also find the neutron model hard to swallow for the
same reasons you mentioned. Which is why I still prefer some kind proton
capture at this time.
I just have a hunch they may both be right with their respective mixes some
how, however but I agree experiment is the b
But Stephen – what you suggest would involve neutron irradiation … which would
activate much more than the nickel, if that was the main channel. Since there
is no secondary activation, neutrons are probably out (except as something like
Hagelstein’s neutron “hopping” which is speculative).
I
@Jones Beene. Are you sure that they are not both correct? You said something
interesting about the medical use of Ni62 and how both Ni62 and Ni64 form radio
active isotopes Ni63 and Ni 65 if irradiated by neutrons. Could this be part of
the process some how? For the LENR device maybe Ni65 is no
March 10, 2016 – By Steven B. Krivit –
Industrial Heat has apparently terminated its relationship with
businessman Andrea Rossi.
Andrea Rossi March 21, 2016 at 12:56 PM
IH has the exclusive right to do this. (distribute the E-Cat in the US)
Industrial Heat wrote “Any claims made about techno
From: Bob Higgins
Ø Interestingly, what MFMP found in the assay of its 62Ni sample was that the
fraction of 64Ni in the enriched sample was not increased.
This is not surprising. The main use of the 62 isotopes appears to be medical.
The online information suggests that the starting iso
Note that the Lugano report's TOF-SIMS analysis reported the 62Ni
concentration of 98.7% (not pure 62Ni, see page 42, Table 1). Also, the
Lugano report's ICP-MS analysis reported the ash sample tested (different
particle) to be 99.3% (page 53, table in the middle of the page). Neither
of these er
Industrialization failure would not be a surprise at all, with a report
saying it is leaking, melting, breaking from all side...
If so, the interest if IH is simply to keep the report secret and work on
improving the reliability until they can deliver a reactor that work , in
the industrial way, at
I don't understand why people like Jones make what look like libelous
comments about Rossi, but they do.
Responsible companies like Cherokee and Woodford Equity do due
diligence. They would be liable for legal consequences if the plant
didn't exist and yet they have claimed they did due dilig
Jones Beene wrote:
> It is beyond reasonable doubt that Rossi “salted” the reactor with
> enriched isotope and did not tell anyone.
>
This is not beyond doubt. There is no evidence for it. People who know a
great deal about mass spectroscopy tell me that it is difficult to measure
isotopes in sma
art of patience is
long lost.
From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 12:03 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat progress
Jones, why is it so " beyond reasonable doubt" it can be many honest
explanations as well..
I unde
Jones, why is it so " beyond reasonable doubt" it can be many honest
explanations as well..
I understand the reasons to debate the Lugano report from an academic /
scientific point of view.
I do not understand why it is important to find out if the insufficiency is
caused on purposeful manipulation
From: alain.coetmeur@gmail
* saying it is a fraud seems not fair for me. Lugano report is visibly
insufficient, unlike anything manufactured to look good...
Alain - I should have been more specific.
It is beyond reasonable doubt that Rossi “salted” the reactor with enriched
isotope and
saying it is a fraud seems not fair for me.
Lugano report is visibly insufficient, unlike anything manufactured to look
good.
Fraud looks perfect, that is a rule, and even a way to detect it.
it is easier to make a fake report that looks perfect than to make a good
one that looks fair.
There is a
For the record, this comment did not come from me. I do not waste time on
Rossi’s absurd blog for one thing.
One the contrary, in my opinion there is no valid proof of any large energy
anomaly from Rossi which is not fully explained by Thermacore’s earlier and
better work - nor is it certain
have seen it earlier, OK, dear Adrian!
Peter
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:50 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Peter Gluck,
> From Rossi's blog.
>
> Jones
> March 20, 2016 at 8:15 AM
>
> DR Rossi – interesting comment on Vortex-L by a ashfield could you comment
> on this:
>
> There must be an important clue
Peter Gluck,
From Rossi's blog.
Jones
March 20, 2016 at 8:15 AM
DR Rossi – interesting comment on Vortex-L by a ashfield could you
comment on this:
There must be an important clue in the new E-Cat X being so small – 100
Watts. This would make a conventional control system for a large plant
thanks, dear Adrian please help Ego Out with new ideas!
Peter
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 5:15 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Peter, you are welcome to publish it.
> I sent that comment on 3/16/2016 and don't know why it took so long to be
> posted.
> I would now add a couple of points:
>
> 1 He will be "
The establishment may know moire about LENR than I had supposed.
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/something-really-bothers-me-about-the-apcoworldwide-lenr-connection/#comments
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/license1.png
Peter, you are welcome to publish it.
I sent that comment on 3/16/2016 and don't know why it took so long to
be posted.
I would now add a couple of points:
1 He will be "connected" to Mats Lewan's symposium in Sweden in June
2 The location of the E-Cat X plant will be disclosed at 1.
3 He hopes
Progress with the E-Cats seems to be moving swiftly now.
Rossi says:
1 He will be "connected" to Mats Lewan's symposium in Sweden in June
2 The location of the E-Cat X plant will be disclosed at 1.
3 He hopes the E-Cat X plant will be installed in April.
4 The trial for the E-Cat X plant will be o
Dear Adrian,
an excellent executive summary, please allow me to publish it on the Ego
Out Blog.
Thank you,
Peter
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:33 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Progress with the E-Cats seems to be moving swiftly now.
> Rossi says:
> 1 He will be "connected" to Mats Lewan's symposium in Sw
21 matches
Mail list logo
