>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: mixent
>To: vortex-l
>Sent: Sat, Oct 17, 2015 12:29 am
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
>
>
>In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:20:17
>-0400:
>
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 17 Oct 2015 01:02:01 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>How does electron volts convert to magnetic field strength in tesla?
It doesn't directly. They measure different things. However it may be indirectly
related in specific circumstances. But it order to answer the ques
Why would a SPP as a black hole look like a tachyon?
http://phys.org/news/2015-09-law-implies-thermodynamic-black-holes.html
Because the area of future and past holographic screens increases in
different directions, the direction of time is different for the two types
of screens. In past screens,
: Sat, Oct 17, 2015 12:29 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:20:17
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>see
>
>http://www.ecoinventions.ca/iccf-18-keith-fredericks-possibility-of-tachyon/
>
>These
th
How does electron volts convert to magnetic field strength in tesla? The
top magnetic field strength to produce a quark gluon soup is 10^^13 tesla.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:05 AM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:20:17 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >see
> >
> >
> http
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:20:17 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>see
>
>http://www.ecoinventions.ca/iccf-18-keith-fredericks-possibility-of-tachyon/
>
>These thing he sees are SPPs
My first impression is that these tracks are the result of a grain of grit being
scraped across the p
see
http://www.ecoinventions.ca/iccf-18-keith-fredericks-possibility-of-tachyon/
These thing he sees are SPPs
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:09 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 21:11:02 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >The energy from muon decay leaves electrons and the re
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 21:11:02 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The energy from muon decay leaves electrons and the remainder of this
>energy is reabsorbed back into the SPP soliton.
I would expect a fair amount to be lost in neutrinos. Only that which remained
with the electrons
The energy from muon decay leaves electrons and the remainder of this
energy is reabsorbed back into the SPP soliton. All the while more muons
are generated in a continuing cycle from the SPPs. The Solitons are also
slowly decaying through the emission of hawking radiation in the infrared
range, Th
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:14:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>This is called super-absorption. The energy release would be spread equally
>throughout a BEC of a billon coherent solitons each getting a few hundred
>thousand electron volts. These solitons store energy. Their energy
This is called super-absorption. The energy release would be spread equally
throughout a BEC of a billon coherent solitons each getting a few hundred
thousand electron volts. These solitons store energy. Their energy holding
capacity is 64 GeV each but most hold far less. Then there is the energy
t
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:58:10 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Not if the energy spike was thermalized throughout a global BEC.
It makes no difference. Release of that much energy instantly in such a confined
space would result in an explosion, though perhaps not really large eno
Not if the energy spike was thermalized throughout a global BEC.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:43 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:12:26 -0400:
> Hi,
> >In the Lugano test, the 100 micro nickel particle swapped either 1, 2, 3
> or
> >4 neutrons from lithium 7 to g
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:12:26 -0400:
Hi,
>In the Lugano test, the 100 micro nickel particle swapped either 1, 2, 3 or
>4 neutrons from lithium 7 to get to pure Ni62 from Ni58, Ni60 and Ni61 and
>this swap happened to all billion atoms of the that particle in one shot
ich might tie in with
>>> the Swede’s paper...
>>>
>>> -mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:47 AM
>>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>> *Subjec
involves a new observation about resonance which might tie in with the
>> Swede’s paper...
>>
>> -mark
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:47 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> *Subje
ay, October 15, 2015 12:49 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
Ø
Ø I posted a ref from physorg ... It involves a new observation about
resonance which might tie in with the Swede’s paper...
M
I have 2 questions regarding the theory.
What testable experimental predictions does it generate?
How can it be falsified (or do existing observations already falsify it per
Jones)?
Jack
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015, 4:50 AM Mats Lewan wrote:
> Essentially no new physics but a little-known physical e
You are right.
It rather should read differently. Although it becomes a book then. Not
really defending the use of 'never'.
In your case it is contrary to what I hear from you and most others here in
Vortex.
I guess it is the old story about the bar in the eye:)
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
ww
From: Lennart Thornros
* [snip] There are very few 'never' and 'ever' that stands for long…
*
*“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a
commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM
Oops… :-)
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:48:43 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
There is also the problem of the missing prompt gammas which would be emitted as
a consequence of the capture of free neutrons.
Note that a neutron transfer/hopping reaction doesn't have this problem because
the ener
Hey Jones,
I have no way of discussing the issue with you. You are in a different pay
grade.
However, I am a little amazed about your very final judgement about the
theory proposed. I am not saying it is right . I for sure do not say your
analysis lack anything.
It just amazes me that people in Vor
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
*
* I posted a ref from physorg ... It involves a new observation about
resonance which might tie in with the Swede’s paper...
Mark, No problem with the resonance. It’s the neutrons that are the problem.
What the Swedes should know, but apparently do not fully
@pacbell.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 9:47 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation
> break-through
>
>
>
> FWIW: Before pinning a medal on these guys, I want to present a contrary
> opinion.
&g
15, 2015 9:47 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
FWIW: Before pinning a medal on these guys, I want to present a contrary
opinion.
There is no scoop here. Unless it is BS which is being scooped.
The theory looks a lot
electric field gradient (maybe
> across a surface) at a certain resonance. Lots of parameters that can be
> engineered. Seems to fit Rossi’s conditions well.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> *From:* Mats Lewan
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:50 AM
>
> *
can be engineered.
Seems to fit Rossi’s conditions well.
Bob Cook
From: Mats Lewan <mailto:m...@matslewan.se>
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:50 AM
To: mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
Essentially no new p
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David Roberson wrote:
The concepts they discuss are interesting, but I find it extremely
> difficult to believe that neutrons are released freely at low energy.
Agreed. Free neutrons are a huge problem if they were occurring. They are
indiscriminate and will
]
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
It looks to me like Mats scooped all the other news outlets. Good work Mats.
The paper is quite good and understandable. Neutron spallation and slow
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thu, Oct 15, 2015 11:14 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
It looks to me like Mats scooped all the other news outlets. Good work Mats.
The paper is quite good and understandable
be engineered.
Seems to fit Rossi’s conditions well.
Bob Cook
From: Mats Lewan
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:50 AM
To: mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through
Essentially no new physics but a little-known physical effect
Essentially no new physics but a little-known physical effect describing
matter’s interaction with electromagnetic fields — ponderomotive Miller forces
— would explain energy release and isotopic changes in LENR. This is what
Rickard Lundin and Hans Lidgren, two top level Swedish scientists, cla
Published by Mats this morning:
Essentially no new physics but a little-known physical effect describing
matter’s interaction with electromagnetic fields — *ponderomotive Miller
forces* — would explain energy release and isotopic changes in LENR. This
is what Rickard Lundin and Hans Lidgren, two t
33 matches
Mail list logo
