Re: [Vo]:Near earth asteroid info

Guys, Just a thought experiment I had since we are near a solar maxima. If the average CME is a billion tons and three per day occur on average somewhere on the surface during maxima, moving between 30 and 3000 miles/second, how come we are not struck by Mt Everest (est. weight a billion tons as

Re: [Vo]:Near earth asteroid info

We are a tiny target but we do have a gravity field and "solar wind" connecting us that should make us appear a little mo Bigga? Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Sunday, February 10, 2013, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:51 AM, ChemE Stewart > > > wrote: &g

Re: [Vo]:Near earth asteroid info

, February 10, 2013, David Roberson wrote: > That bullet is moving pretty fast in our direction. Gravity might not > have much of an opportunity to work very well on it. This would be a good > one for you to model. > > Dave > > > -Original Message----- >

Re: [Vo]:Near earth asteroid info

The 1859 carrington event was followed by 1860, the year of meteors, is that the kind of diffuse plasma you are referring too? On Sunday, February 10, 2013, Eric Walker wrote: > On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:03, ChemE Stewart > > wrote: > > > how come the inner solar sytem, over millio

Re: [Vo]:Near earth asteroid info

It just seems to me that 1 CME avg per day x 1.2 Billion Tons/CME x 4.5 Billion Years old x 365 days/year = LOTS OF ordinary STUFF floating around the solar system. Of course I am thinking lots of it is collapsed matter but what do I know. Stewart On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Eric Walker

Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature

Also remember that a BEC under magnetic field alignment has been known to collapse/explode into a "Bosenova" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosenova Stewart On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > It is an interesting question as to what percentage of the yield of > “Mike” – if

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

Almost certainly will never happen??? That's the same attitude the dinosaurs had. Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Friday, February 15, 2013, Vorl Bek wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:23:22 -0500 > Jed Rothwell > wrote: > > > This video captures the sound of the explosion and breaking glass: > >

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

Comets are notoriously unpredictable and unstable so I disagree with your celestial mechanics On Friday, February 15, 2013, Vorl Bek wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:04:27 -0500 > Jed Rothwell > wrote: > > > Vorl Bek > wrote: > > > > And when was the one before that? > > > > > > > No one knows whe

Re: [Vo]:better video of alleged meteor shoot down

How about an energetic nuclei that is weakly interacting and feels no friction. It would take off like a bat out of hell once it sheds its baryonic skin. A baby comet so to speak. On Monday, February 18, 2013, Alan Fletcher wrote: > At 06:37 PM 2/17/2013, Jones Beene wrote: > >> Here is an expl

Re: [Vo]:Dark matter soon to be exposed

I hope so, they spent $2B plus on that magnetometer. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Virtual particle annihilation to provide a handle on the character of dark > matter, and soon. > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21495800 > > "The smoking gun signature in t

Re: [Vo]:Meteor crater

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derweze I think it is an abandoned mine that has been burning for 35 years... On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alexander Hollins < alexander.holl...@gmail.com> wrote: > thats not an impact crater. Looks like a sink hole, looks like the > road itself is in part

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

Of course I also agree that our model is wrong: 1)They found no massive hunk of iron in that 30' hole in the lake because there was no ball of iron as a nucleus to begin with. That is a sinkhole 2) Our estimate of the mass of those objects based upon ordinary matter is vastly too low because they

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

You, like NASA, are off by at least a factor of 1000... http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/19/russian-meteorite-1000-times-bigger-than-originally-thought/ Of course maybe it was just diffuse plasma. Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Eric Walker wrote: > On Feb 20

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

ook at the beginning of this thread. > > > 2013/2/20 ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> > >> You, like NASA, are off by at least a factor of 1000... >> >> >> http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/19/russian-meteorite-1000-times-bigger-than-ori

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:49 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > > You, like NASA, are off by at least a factor of 1000... > > > > > http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/19/russian-meteorite-1000-times-bigger-than-originally-thought/ > > That article

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

t and its > weight around 10ktons. > > > 2013/2/20 ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> > >> Close, probably dark matter nuclei :) >> >> I think I read 50m diameter but I have not done the math. >> >> I want to see if they can find w

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

10,000 tons is A LOT OF STUFF On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:06 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Where is it? > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >> There is nothing unusual about that asteroid. Calculate the kinetic >> energy of a sphere with 15m of d

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

> have a volume of 4/3*pi*(7.5) ~ 1800m^3. The total weight is around > 12thousand tons. Not much, really. > > > 2013/2/20 ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> > >> 10,000 tons is A LOT OF STUFF >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:06 PM,

Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: explaining LENR - II

This is the theory of gravity I like best. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity#Erik_Verlinde.27s_theory "There is no reasonable doubt concerning the physical reality of entropic forces, and no reasonable doubt that classical (and semi-classical) general relativity is closely related to

Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: explaining LENR - II

Incomplete theory, less than optimum results... It had only been five years since Orville and Wilbur Wright made their famous flight at Kitty Hawk. By 1908, the Wright brothers were traveling across the United States and Europe in

Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: explaining LENR - II

Poor propeller design theory You take yourself awfully serious Jed On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I wrote: > > >> Multiple fail-safe devices in a high pressure call all failed at once, in >> a terrible coincidence. >> > > Meant "high pressure CELL." See p. 139: > > http:/

Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: explaining LENR - II

OK, you take your knowledge about the Wright brothers very seriously Jed. On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote: > ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > Poor propeller design theory > > > Nope. Good theory, bad craftsmanship. They trie

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

Wow, I thought my theory was strange. I think our space tracking capabilities for high speed celestial objects are woefully lacking and we are sitting ducks. We have civilians with HD video cams that are detecting these objects before the governments. On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bower

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

etend that I said nothing about classified information. > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > > Wow, I thought my theory was strange. > I think our space tracking capabilities for high speed > celestial objects are woefully lacking and we are sitting du

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

. > > On the other hand if you, at long last, have actually come up with > arithmetic, you might try not only providing a URL instead of merely > referring to some menu on some website, but applying that arithmetic in an > explanation of the observe phenomena. > > >

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

ot; that is more plausible than mine > remains unanswered even in part. > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:35 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > > Darkmattersalot.com > on the menu > > My unfalsifiable claim regarding cold fusion is still aliens farting > through a wormhole, t

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

torial" unless you include routine government > classified work as "conspiratorial". > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:46 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > > Ok, > > The object was in a 2 body kepler orbit, formula on my site > > The 20' dia perfectly round ho

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

ested in your > trolls. > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, ChemE Stewart > > > wrote: > >> Hard to do math while driving and texting on my iPhone. >> >> Glad you liked the theories, the second was similar to yours and grouped >> with the Mayans based

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

Thanks for keeping me awake I drove 10 hours today. Stalemate is OK with me. On Thursday, February 21, 2013, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Don't speak for everyone, you are the only unaccredited Bowery U professor > requesting homework while you advance more government conspiracy theorie

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

" could actually keep secret a project that was on the order of a few tens of billions of dollars -- but there are reasons to believe this level of secrecy is within the capability of the military." Right, your theory is locked within secret government documents. Mine is open to falsify, with som

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

ric > regarding everything from hurricanes to sinkholes -- and let us not forget > that you intersperse these comments with "joking" asides regarding a > variety of other phenomena that are as substantiated as your "serious" > claims, so that it appears your entire presence h

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

be >> typical of your reponses to pointed questions: Evasive. >> >> The only thing that might possibly be construed as related to my theory >> is this uncited sentence: "Other theories claim the meteorite itself was >> evidence of a new weapon." and the onl

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

most likely to be involved in the development of space-based kinetic energy > weapons: Science Applications International Corporation. I frequently > received in my mail box there mail addressed to the prior occupant of my > office, Peter > Vajk<http://www.amazon.com/Doomsday-been

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured

Terry, thanks for clearing it up. Whatever was steering that last meteoroid was a very bad driver. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, James Bowery wrote: > Terry, if you want to invoke scifi space based kinetic energy weapons with > precise targeting, try "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" by Heinle

Re: [Vo]:The Kinetic Energy Weapon (Bluff?) Theory of February 15, 2013's Cosmic Coincidence

Did you guys invent the Internet too? Terry, I like your theory better. On Friday, February 22, 2013, James Bowery wrote: > Before I get into talking about the delightful coincidence of February 15, > 2013 between the close Earth flyby of an asteroid and the largest meteor > entry to Earth's atm

Re: [Vo]:The Kinetic Energy Weapon (Bluff?) Theory of February 15, 2013's Cosmic Coincidence

I think a much more plausible theory is that one of those 3 large inbound comets have pulled in asteroids with them On Friday, February 22, 2013, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Did you guys invent the Internet too? Terry, I like your theory better. > > On Friday, February 22, 2013, James Bow

Re: [Vo]:The Kinetic Energy Weapon (Bluff?) Theory of February 15, 2013's Cosmic Coincidence

ergy. Am I missing something? On Friday, February 22, 2013, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:19 PM, ChemE Stewart > > > wrote: > > Did you guys invent the Internet too? Terry, I like your theory better. > > I don't recall "God's Rods

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

Only 9,999.99 tons to go! @ $2400/gram I figured it is worth $16 Trillion... On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:37 PM, William Beaty wrote: > > Chondrite. Only small hunks, not 'big' > > In Russian, but look at the picture! >> http://www.mk.ru/science/**space/article/2013/02/22/** >> 816801-chelyabi

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

orl Bek wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:41:11 -0500 > ChemE Stewart wrote: > > > Only 9,999.99 tons to go! > > And what happened to the remains of the Tunguska meteor??? > > Even if it broke up in the air, there must have been humungous > chunks of the thing lying ar

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

Weight of Object10,000.00tons“ 20,000,000.00lbs“ 9,080,000,000.00gramsValue per gram 2,200.00$/gmValue1.9976E+13$*“**20**trillion dollars*If it really is all baryonic matter, it would pay of the US Debt with 4 trillion to spare. However, I think it was hollow and mo

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

Based upon the size of the "crater" we should go dig it up then and erase our national debt On Saturday, February 23, 2013, David Roberson wrote: > I visited it once and the story is that the meteorite came in at a steep > angle and is buried under one of the rims. > > Dave > > > -Original

Re: [Vo]:star shaped gravity waves

Harry, Thanks for that link. What is interesting to me, as I have curiously plowed thru hundreds of crop circle images to get a "feel" for them, some of those gravity waves and interference patterns tend to also show up in the fields. A very good visual site for those interested in browsing the

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

that the amount of money you could get for it would be a > lot less than you believe. Remember supply and demand? Too much supply of > this one. > > Dave > > > > -Original Message- > From: ChemE Stewart > To: vortex-l > Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 6:

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

Roberson >> >> > wrote: >> >>> I believe it was an iron meteorite. The value of one of these items is >>> proportional to what someone else is willing to pay for it. I have a >>> strong suspicion that the amount of money you could get for it woul

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

Hey, you left your lights on... http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dtFGBbRhdFQ On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:37 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Love you too man > > > On Sunday, February 24, 2013, James Bowery wrote: > >> Yeah what else is he joking ab

Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)

Crater? Disintegration implies transfer of kinetic energy. Wonder how many pieces it exploded into? I heard they found a 1 kg chunk On Monday, February 25, 2013, David Jonsson wrote: > Such a large impact means it had a high speed on impact and > distintegrated. > > David > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2

Re: [Vo]:Tech Predictions

It will probably be a comet that takes us out at some point. Looks like Mars may be in the crosshairs for Early Next Year. Best we hope those big comets approaching the Sun don't break up and get squirrly. Uncertainty Certainly http://news.discovery.com/space/astronomy/could-a-comet-hit-mars-in

Re: [Vo]:Tech Predictions

to that comet approaching mars next year. On Monday, February 25, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote: > ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > >> It will probably be a comet that takes us out at some point. >> > > Those things are not that difficult to

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Vacuum --University in Finland

I like that Hawking radiation. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ron Kita wrote: > Greetings Vortex-L, > > The Quantum Vacuum and realization: > http://phys.org/news/2013-02-particles-illuminate-vacuum.html > > Ron Kita > Doylestown PA >

Re: [Vo]:Tech Predictions

We are connected to the Earth and we are all, like the Earth, creatures of the quantum vacuum. Once we realize those filaments of energetic dark matter connecting the universe contain beaucoup amounts of entropic vacuum energy at our disposal, and realize how to utilize it, off we go. Stewart O

Re: [Vo]:Light particles illuminate the vacuum

95% of the energy in the universe is locked in that vacuum. That is our key. We are getting small wiffs of it in cold fusion. I believe energetic vacuum particles are orbiting within the dark band of a double rainbow. Pulling a vacuum on their surroundings, condensing water vapor and creating l

[Vo]:Should We Send a Team to Rescue Curiosity?

http://english.pravda.ru/news/science/25-02-2013/123895-mars_comet-0/ I am not sure how to post a new topic on Vortex, OK I am a dumba$$ Maybe this will work Stewart On Monday, February 25, 2013, David Roberson wrote: > In the case of meteor crater in Az., they claim to have located a large >

Re: [Vo]:Should We Send a Team to Rescue Curiosity?

Thanks, expensive camera: *Curiosity* had a total *cost* of 2.5 billion dollars. Maybe he can hunker down behind a big rock. I thought I had tried that before on a new topic. Stewart On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, ChemE Stew

Re: [Vo]:Should We Send a Team to Rescue Curiosity?

He bought a round trip ticket On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:17 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > > Thanks, expensive camera: Curiosity had a total cost of 2.5 billion > dollars. > > And the return cost? :-) > >

Re: [Vo]:Should We Send a Team to Rescue Curiosity?

Jed, I am in your camp on this. It is time we figure out all that is orbiting out there, some of it at extremely high speeds and energy levels I believe. Stewart On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Vorl Bek wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:59:40 -0500 > Jed Rothwell wrote: > > > > > The report s

Re: [Vo]:Is a Comet on a Collision Course with Mars?

Just getting whacked by the either the ion tail or the dust/debris tail could be a terrible event. One of the twenty or so Shoemaker-Levy 9 nuclei left a dark spot on Jupiter the size of the Pacific Ocean. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote: > > > http://www.universetoday.com/10

Re: [Vo]:Should We Send a Team to Rescue Curiosity?

I am guessing the Aliens use universal WIFI anyway on the dark matter entropic internet. The Aliens already responded to Carl's message, SETI just scoffed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4CYcp5wObs On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I wrote: > > >> In one of his books, Ar

Re: [Vo]:Is a Comet on a Collision Course with Mars?

ission of X-rays and far ultraviolet<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_ultraviolet> photons <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon>.[15]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_tail#cite_note-15> I think you are right about the vacuum, vacuum energy that is, from comet nuclei. Stewart

Re: [Vo]:Is a Comet on a Collision Course with Mars?

Mars lost its magnetic field and atmosphere a long time ago, maybe it will get its mojo back On Wednesday, February 27, 2013, Jones Beene wrote: > Hey... an icy comet, colliding with and ... whoa, you guessed it, reviving > Mars by bringing in lots of water ... sounds like Sci-Fi and for good > r

Re: [Vo]:Is a Comet on a Collision Course with Mars?

Which includes quantum mechanics A comet is unpredictable like a cat. Schrödinger's cat with a tail On Wednesday, February 27, 2013, Mark Gibbs wrote: > (Sing to the tune "As Time Goes By") > > And so, it's come to this > A miss is just a miss > When a comet's passing by > The fundamental laws

Re: [Vo]:Should We Send a Team to Rescue Curiosity?

[image: I Like this quote] [image: I dislike this quote]“The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.” [image: I Like this quote] [image: I dislike this quote]“Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the g

Re: [Vo]:Should We Send a Team to Rescue Curiosity?

Yup On Wednesday, February 27, 2013, wrote: > In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:27:14 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] > >He bought a round trip ticket > > > > ... then he got cheated. ;) > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

It looks like they believe the meteor came from the asteroid belt out past Mars. There is a new paper posted on Arxiv http://news.discovery.com/space/asteroids-meteors-meteorites/russian-meteor-analysis-orbit-apollo-asteroid-130226.htm James, you said that it could not have been pulled in from a

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

The primary assumption in the Arxiv paper I referenced is that the meteor tracked in a line to the 25' dia hole in the ice "Assuming that the hole in the ice sheet of Lake Cherbakul was produced by a fragment of the meteoroid is also a very important hypothesis of this work. More importantly, our

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

I also know that one hell of a lot of those craters look like big sinkholes. You would think this place would be crawling with chunks of meteorites based upon all the holes. Here is a good blog by a NASA engineer about sinkholes and caves on the Moon. http://blog.moonzoo.org/2011/04/11/potential

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

----Original Message- > From: ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> > To: vortex-l 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');>> > Sent: Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:15 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds > > The primary assumption in the Arxiv paper

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

Me too On Thursday, February 28, 2013, Harry Veeder wrote: > Unless the russian meteor was tracked for a period of time before it > entered earth's atmosphere, extropolating the orbit of the Russian > meteor into the past seems like guess work to me. > > > harry > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:07 P

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

James, That paper was well written with lots of history , thanks for posting . Looks like much of that research was done during Apollo. I have a attached a new paper just released on Arxiv. It discusses the paradigm of trying to explain how some of the "craters" have raised center cones with bou

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

My theory on Tunguska. 1) The object exploded over Earth just like the recent Meteor did in Russia, leveling millions of trees. Good article here: http://www.qsl.net/w5www/tunguska.html 2) The area was covered with high traces of iridium, which is rare on the Earth's surface. http://onlinelibrar

Re: [Vo]:Feeding Stewart

Many enter into a 2-body orbit with the Earth's center of mass around a barycenter. If their orbits pop up in the ocean, they create a low pressure disturbance in the atmosphere and slowly work their way towards the sinkhole over the next few months. Just like those elliptical flux tubes on the s

Re: [Vo]:Hold the presses - major blog expose' ... Jed is really Abd :)

It's worse, Jed is really a Robot put here to advance his species...:) On Sunday, March 3, 2013, Jones Beene wrote: > > http://donalfagan.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/nasa-widom-larsen-and-lenr-infigh > ting/ > > "Rothwell, who also goes by Abd, is known for wielding an array of sock > puppets across

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

Jim, Have you tried to plug this additional Russian sized asteroid into your probability model that they just found a couple of days ago passing between us and the moon? http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/03/17171923-another-asteroid-similar-to-russian-meteor-zooming-past-us-harmlessly?lite

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

Alex, I haven't been able to google any numerical data yet but I think it is fairly well established that comet tails create meteor showers. The Leonid meteor shower is thought to originate from the comet Tempel-Tuttle. The Leonid meteors

Re: [Vo]:Feeding Stewart

Terry, Thanks, i read that and think it is MONDO wrongo. Most physicists believe dark matter is real. For MONDO to be correct, Newtonian gravity needs to be variable. Which, if you believe comets are snowballs that can pass thru the sun might be easy to do. Supposed to be some announcements in

Re: [Vo]:Feeding Stewart

Should be interesting, I think the place is crawling with dark matter and we have just been misinterpreting what we are seeing. I think it is the thermodynamic piece of entropic gravity that was missed. It is messy though, just look at the severe weather upsets, it is not just warming, it is warm

Re: [Vo]:Feeding Stewart

http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/03/05/follow-the-magnetic-lines-and-there-you-will-find-matter-of-another-kind/ Last picture is the best On Monday, March 4, 2013, ChemE Stewart wrote: > Should be interesting, I think the place is crawling with dark matter and > we have just been misinterp

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

magnitude > are a _lot_ more frequent than currently available data suggest. A > smaller meteroid passing at a distance that is 10 times the distance > of2012 DA14 is in the noise either way. > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:14 AM, ChemE Stewart > > > wrote: > >> Ji

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

Are you saying the meteor itself was a kinetic energy weapon? Because it did not hit anything. It exploded. Am I missing something? A *kinetic energy penetrator* (also known as a *KE weapon*) is a type of ammunition which, like a bullet

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

a limit that would be very very > difficult for adversaries to place reasonable error bars on. > > > Foreign policy implications are still at issue here but, for crying out > loud, aren't there enough potential reasons for conflict between Russia and > the US? > > On Tue,

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

194988.5 ton_explosive > > > http://www.testardi.com/rich/calchemy2/ > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:18 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > >> But something exploded with the force of 30 Hiroshima bombs, I don't >> believe a sonic boom can do that >> >&g

Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor coincidence odds

/news/resources/releases/2007/asteroid.html > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:43 AM, ChemE Stewart wrote: > >> I understand kinetic energy, but a kinetic energy weapon is designed to >> slam into something, the meteor did not hit anything As far as I can tell >> the larg

Re: [Vo]:

Lot's of energy in that vacuum. Nature bottled it up for good reason. On Tuesday, March 5, 2013, Axil Axil wrote: > > To understand why polaritons cause LENR when they are confined within a > nano-cavity, a look at some newly developed quantum mechanical models of > dipole-photon interactions is

Re: [Vo]:Hate to say I told you so... :-)

Good Stuff On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:17 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote: > “LHC team observes first instance of D-mesons oscillating between matter > and antimatter” > > http://phys.org/news/2013-03-lhc-team-instance-d-mesons-oscillating.html** > ** > > ** ** > > Preprint here: > > http://arxi

Re: [Vo]:FBI Raids Inteligentry

Maybe they detected cosmic rays emanating from the building :) On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jones Beene wrote: > > > >> This is not the way real companies operate … and make no mistake - they >> have raised millions . . . >> > > Did they really raise millions? Is there

Re: [Vo]:RE: Proton radius in question, after 3 years the textbooks may need to be corrected...

negative spin is a political orientation On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:50 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint > > > wrote: > > I would posit that spin is the phase relationship of the oscillations... > > Robin has not enthusiastically jumped in to explain. ;-) >

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:chlorine - hydrogen ion explosion

I would stick to the plasmoid theory. Anything with an "oid" at the end makes it sound more believable :) On Thursday, March 14, 2013, Jones Beene wrote: > Whoa. Think about what you claiming Axil. > > ** ** > > “Cooling an expanding gas - by adding energy in the form of RF” > > ** **

Re: [Vo]:Forbes: Tiny Nuclear Reactions Inside Compact Fluorescent Bulbs?

I keep burning the damn things out at home, they were supposed to last 10 years! On Thursday, March 14, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote: > The W-L theory again! > > It sure wins on PR. > > - Jed > >

Re: [Vo]:Forbes: Tiny Nuclear Reactions Inside Compact Fluorescent Bulbs?

I didn't think cfls had been at Home Depot for 10 years? Are you thinking regular fluorescents? On Thursday, March 14, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote: > ChemE Stewart 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > I keep burning the damn things out at home, they were supposed to

Re: [Vo]:Graneau Questions

I think lightning is the discharge from the buildup of charge in the atmosphere created from the surface LENR of orbital quantum micro black holes of entropy and the cooling & condensing, rain and snow is triggered as they extract entropy from the surrounding gaseous atmosphere along cold fronts an

Re: [Vo]:Cluster Decay

Other than maybe an atom smasher Particle accelerators have historically been used to smash atoms or particles together, often to induce nuclear transmutation, the conversion of one element to another. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Campa

Re: [Vo]:Another larger meteor, on U.S. east coast

Here's a good historical article on 1860 "year of meteors" painting by Walt Whitman. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/written-in-the-skies-the-truth-behind-year-of-meteors-1990008.html 1859 was the Carrington Event solar storm The sun has been relatively quiet so far this

Re: [Vo]:Another larger meteor, on U.S. east coast

ormal process of near earth material. > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM, ChemE Stewart > > > wrote: > >> Here's a good historical article on 1860 "year of meteors" painting by >> Walt Whitman. >> >> >> http://www.independent.co.uk/ar

Re: [Vo]:Rossi says third party tests concluded

I hope the output is at least as powerful as the two years of hot air expelled discussing it On Monday, March 25, 2013, Terry Blanton wrote: > ” WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT > THE ‘ EFFECT’ IS REAL BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT”. > > does not sound very encouraging in terms of CoP of the HCat. If it > to

Re: [Vo]:EckhartTolleDYING MATRIX vs SIRIUS DISCLOSURE/BOB DEAN. .DARK VOICE Eckhart Tolle SAME VOICE as HITLER spooky

(6a*R*,9*R*)- *N*,*N*- diethyl- 7-methyl- 4,6,6a,7,8,9- hexahydroindolo- [4,3-*fg*] quinoline- 9-carboxamide On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > Wow. Was that dream in color? > > You know they will not let Obama near the Dome o' the Rock, right? > >

Re: [Vo]:EckhartTolleDYING MATRIX vs SIRIUS DISCLOSURE/BOB DEAN. .DARK VOICE Eckhart Tolle SAME VOICE as HITLER spooky

Cool dude, my dad was u.s. army air corps dec 7th 1941 @ hickam field, pearl harbor. He then flew a b-24l out of foggia, italy for 3 1/2 years bombing the axis. His stories were not as good as your dad's, he tried to drink a lot of alcohol and forget about what he saw. Stewart On Friday, March

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Electrolytic/CatalyticFusion'is'a ZERO-POINT PHENOMENON

Jack, I need your disconnected toroidal brain to look at the Joplin, MO tornadic double rainbow with a dark band and imagine it is a toroid that is pulling a vacuum on the surrounding gas, condensing water vapor, bending light and creating electromagnetic disturbances around it and I think you wil

Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent hydrogen

conciously... On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > > The only problem is that Asimov was not looking at positrons (or the > Dirac sea) as an energy source - AFAIK. > > True; but, his robot series was this engineer's first

Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent hydrogen

Jones, Do you think a strong magnetic field, such as a million watt 3 GHz electromagnetic pulse from a doppler microwave radar tower can entice particles (positively charged) from the "Dirac Sea"? Stewart On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > Bob, > > Another point for consid

Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent hydrogen

ieve the Core of the Earth is really just folded up vacuum (probably a 6-d torus) http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/04/15/is-it-our-brane-thats-still-foggy-or-is-it-just-string-theory-for-dummies-me/ Just my take on it. Stewart On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:

Re: [Vo]:Problem with glare at Ivanpah CSP plant

Jed, Does it count as a kill if there is no evidence left? "Ivanpah employees and OLE staff noticed that close to the periphery of the tower and within the reflected solar field area, streams of smoke arise when an object crosses the solar flux fields aimed at the tower. Ivanpah employees use the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >