Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, I try adding to session stanza in startup.conf: session { poll-main }. But the performance is still exists. Thanks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21381): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/21381 Mute This Topic:

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, We have only one numa node. Just as the following picture show. vpp# sh hardware-interfaces verbose Name                Idx   Link  Hardware ens1f0                             1     up   ens1f0 Link speed: 10 Gbps RX Queues: queue thread         mode 0     main (0)       polling 1     main

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi Yacan, Currently rpcs from first worker to main are done through session layer and are processed by main in batches. Session queue node runs on main in interrupt mode so first worker will set an interrupt when the list of pending connects goes non-empty and main will switch to polling in

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi Florin, weizhen9612:     I'm not sure whether rpc for connects will be executed immediately by the main thread in the current implementation, or will it wait for the epoll_pwait in linux_epoll_input_inline() to time out. Regards,yacan On 5/5/2022 16:19，

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, Now I configure main-core to 2 and corelist-workers to 0, and find that the performance has improved significantly. When I execute the following conmand, I find that vpp have main thread only. #show threads What does this situation show？ Thanks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, Just as you see, I check the patch. Thanks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21368): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/21368 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/90793836/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Can you check if [1] patch merged? [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/33496 Regards, Hanlin | | 汪翰林 | | hanlin_w...@163.com | On 5/5/2022 10:51， wrote： Hi, When I set a long connection, the performance of vpp proxy is higher than before. But we need to set a short connection between vpp

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, When I set a long connection, the performance of vpp proxy is higher than before. But we need to set a short connection between vpp and upstream server. Thanks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21362):

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

You can try to set the long downstream and upstream connections in nginx configruation like this: http { ... keepalive_timeout 65; keepalive_requests 100; upstream backend{ ... keepalive 3; } } Regards, Hanlin | | 汪翰林 | | hanlin_w...@163.com

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Next step then. What’s segment-size and add-segment-size in vcl.conf? Could you set them to something large like 40? Also event-queue-size 100, just to make sure mq and fifo segments are not a limiting factor. In vpp under session stanza, set event-queue-length 20. Try also to

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, I test the performance of upstream server. Just as you see, the performance of upstream is more higher than vpp proxy. In addition, I don't find any drops. Thanks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21359):

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

As mentioned previously, is the upstream server handling the load? Do you see drops between vpp and the upstream server? Regards, Florin > On May 4, 2022, at 9:10 AM, weizhen9...@163.com wrote: > > Hi, >According to your suggestion, I config the src-address. > > > But the performance is

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

What’s the result prior to multiple addresses? Also, can you give it the whole /24? No need to configure the ips, just tcp src-address 192.168.6.6-192.168.6.250 Forgot to ask before but is the server that’s being proxied for handling the load? It will also need to accept a lot of connections.

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

According to your suggestion, I test with multiple source ips. But the performance is still low. The ip is as follows. vpp#tcp src-address 192.168.6.6-192.168.6.9 Thanks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21354):

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, That shouldn’t be the issue. Half-opens are on main because connection establishment needs locks before it sends out a syn packet. Handshakes are not completed on main but on workers. VPP with one worker + main should be able to handle 100k+ CPS with warmed up pools. Long term we’ll

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, Is this the reason for the low performance? In general, the main threads handles management functions(debug CLI, API, stats collection) and one or more worker threads handle packet processing from input to output of the packet. Why does the main core handle the session? Does the condition

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, Those are half-open connects. So yes, they’re expected if nginx opens a new connection for each request. Regards, Florin > On May 4, 2022, at 6:48 AM, weizhen9...@163.com wrote: > > Hi, > When I use wrk to test the performance of nginx proxy using vpp host > stack, I execute the

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, When I use wrk to test the performance of  nginx proxy using vpp host stack, I execute the command "show session" by vppctl. The result is following. The main core has most of sessions. Is this normal? If not, what should I DO? Thanks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, Unfortunately, I have not, partly because I didn’t expect too much out of the test due to the issues you’re hitting. What’s the difference between linux and vpp with and without tcp_max_tw_bucket? Regards, Florin > On May 3, 2022, at 3:28 AM, weizhen9...@163.com wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, I wanted to ask if you have tested the performance of nginx proxy using vpp host stack as a short connection, i.e. after vpp send GET request to upstream server, vpp close the connection. If yes, please tell me the result. Thank you for your suggestion about adding multiple source IPs. But

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, That indeed looks like an issue due to vpp not being able to recycle connections fast enough. There are only 64k connections available between vpp and the upstream server, so recycling them as fast as possible, i.e., with 0 timeout as the kernel does after tcp_max_tw_buckets threshold is

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, The short link means that after the client send GET request, the client send tcp FIN packet. Instead, the long link means that after the client send GET request,  the client send next http GET request by using the same link and don't need to send syn packet. We found that when vpp and the

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, As per this [1], after tcp_max_tw_buckets threshold is hit timewait time is 0 and this [2] explains what will go wrong. Assuming you’re hitting the threshold, 1s timewait-time in vpp will probably not be enough to match performance. Not sure what you mean by “short link”. If you can’t

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, I set the timewait_time which is equal to 1s in tcp's configuration. But the performance of nginx proxy using vpp host stack is still lower than nginx proxy using kernel host stack. Now I want to know what can I do to improve the performance? And does nginx proxy using vpp host stack

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, Understood. See the comments in my previous reply regarding timewait-time (tcp_max_tw_bucket practically sets time-wait to 0 once threshold is passed) and tcp-src address. Regards, Florin > On Apr 30, 2022, at 10:08 AM, weizhen9...@163.com wrote: > > Hi, > I test nginx proxy using

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, I test nginx proxy using RPS. And nginx proxy only towards one IP. Now I test the performance of nginx proxy using vpp host stack and by configuring nginx, it is a short connection between the nginx reverse proxy and the upstream server. The result of test show that the performance of nginx

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, What is performance in this case, CPS? If yes, does nginx proxy only towards one IP, hence the need for tcp_max_tw_bucket? You have the option to reduce time wait time in tcp by setting timewait-time in tcp’s startup.conf stanza. I would not recommend reducing it too much as it can lead

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#vpp-hoststack

Hi, Now I use nginx  which uses vpp host stack as a proxy to test the performance. But I find the performance of nginx using vpp host stack is lower  than nginx using kernel host stack. The reason is that I config the tcp_max_tw_bucket in kernel host stack. So does the vpp stack support the

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#nginx

I completely missed that, thanks Hanlin! For perf tests always use release images. Regards, Florin > On Jan 20, 2022, at 6:27 PM, weizhen9...@163.com wrote: > > Yes, I use a debug version. > Thank you. > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#nginx

Yes, I use a debug version. Thank you. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#20772): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/20772 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/88456731/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe:

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#nginx

Latency with vpp is very high for ~50% of the requests so either some config is still off or something loses packets. To check if the later is the case, try “show error” and check tcp counters for out of order enqueues or “show tcp stats” and check retransmission counters. To make sure we

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#nginx

Hi, I see that some configs have been changed compared to our private conversation. Did that influence results? Nonetheless I’d try with the configs lower. In particular, I noticed you changed default buffer size, numa heap size and remove multi-seg support which are not optimal. Regards,

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#nginx

The version of vpp is: The config of vpp and nginx is the attachment. The vcl config is attachment. The type of nic is: nginx.conf Description: Binary data startup.conf Description: Binary data vcl_test.conf Description: Binary data -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages

Re: [vpp-dev] test performance of nginx using vpp host stack#nginx

Hi, Numbers are pretty low, but it’s hard to say just from those what might be wrong. So let’s try to clarify some things: - what vpp version are you running, how many workers and what’s the config? - what’s the vcl config? Are you you using something similar to the one here [1]? - I’m not

Re: [vpp-dev] test/requirements-3.txt snnoyance

Hi folks, Does https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27657 fix this? Best, Aloÿs > On 24 Jun 2020, at 09:08, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote: > > I will take a look and report... > > --a > >> On 23 Jun 2020, at 18:27, Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io >> wrote: >>

Re: [vpp-dev] test/requirements-3.txt snnoyance

I will take a look and report... --a > On 23 Jun 2020, at 18:27, Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io > wrote: > > Folks, > > Every time I run “make test”, i need to deal with modifications in > test/requirements-3.txt > > Even worse, if I do “git checkout -f”, i cannot run “make test” anymore

Re: [vpp-dev] test/requirements-3.txt snnoyance

Hi Damjan, My personal solution is 'git-review -X 21208', 'make wipe-test test. HTH, On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:27 PM Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io wrote: > Folks, > > Every time I run “make test”, i need to deal with modifications in > test/requirements-3.txt > > Even worse, if I do “git

[vpp-dev] test/requirements-3.txt snnoyance

Folks, Every time I run “make test”, i need to deal with modifications in test/requirements-3.txt Even worse, if I do “git checkout -f”, i cannot run “make test” anymore until remove build-root/build-test. Any idea how to get a rid of that? $ git diff diff --git a/test/requirements-3.txt

[vpp-dev] Test

Testing list -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15478): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15478 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/71432241/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe:

[vpp-dev] test, please ignore

Back from long vacation... 2019-10-15 Kingwel -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14180): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14180 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/34545996/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI

Thank you everyone.  The debug tests are running perfectly! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13404): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13404 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32206961/21656 Group Owner:

Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI

Merged... D. From: Neale Ranns (nranns) Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:20 AM To: Florin Coras ; Dave Barach (dbarach) Cc: Paul Vinciguerra ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI Here’s a fix for BIER: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/20349/ /neale De : mailto:vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI

Here’s a fix for BIER: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/20349/ /neale De : au nom de Florin Coras Date : mercredi 26 juin 2019 à 00:51 À : "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Cc : Paul Vinciguerra , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Objet : Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI This [1] seems

Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI

ck look, then turn the > problem over to Neale if I can’t solve it. > > D. > > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> On Behalf Of Paul Vinciguerra > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 2:55 PM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <ma

Re: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI

The BIER tests cause ASSERT failures. I’ll have a quick look, then turn the problem over to Neale if I can’t solve it. D. From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Paul Vinciguerra Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 2:55 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI I set up a job

[vpp-dev] test-debug in the CI

I set up a job to view the results of debug images. For anyone who might be interested. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/20228/ logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-beta-verify-master-ubuntu1804/7991 non-debug image EXTENDED_TESTS=1 can be seen here.

Re: [vpp-dev] test build with DPDK 19.02-rc2

Thanks for the heads-up. Copying Damjan... Dave -Original Message- From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:16 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [vpp-dev] test build with DPDK 19.02-rc2 Looks like a change went into DPDK which

[vpp-dev] test build with DPDK 19.02-rc2

Looks like a change went into DPDK which rearranged the rte_sched (hQOS) fields in the next release. This breaks build on VPP. Not hard to fix in VPP, but let's wait and see if DPDK intends to break API or if it was just developer not paying attention. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

I'll see if I can reproduce the issue. I seem to recall some python test code which was supposed to detect that condition and clean up, but I don't think that I ever verified that it worked. Thanks, -daw- On 11/16/2018 11:44 AM, Florin Coras wrote: I also noticed that although it shouldn’t

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

I also noticed that although it shouldn’t be different from the vcl test apps which seem to be properly killed on test failure. Anyway, it’s on my todo list, if nobody beats me to it. Florin > On Nov 16, 2018, at 5:27 AM, Klement Sekera wrote: > > I've also noticed that quite often a binary

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

I've also noticed that quite often a binary called sock_test_client is left running after a vpp crash or test failure. What's worse, it eats 100% CPU. Quoting Florin Coras (2018-11-16 00:40:06) >Thanks, Dave! >I’ll take a look at those as soon as I can. I’m running multiple >

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

No, it's on my laptop and out of 16g mem, 11g is caches so there shouldn't be any OOM issue there. Unless you change TEST_JOBS option (setting it to either auto or ), the test framework still runs 1 job at a time. Klement Quoting Florin Coras (2018-11-15 22:16:05) > That’s an interesting

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

That’s an interesting failure. Is the test machine running out of memory? The extended tests are unstable on my server, so I do see quite a number of failures. However this: make test-ext TEST=vcl.VCLCutThruTestCase.test_vcl_cut_thru_uni_dir_nsock runs just fine. After the latest test

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

I'm seeing timeouts and coredumps... e.g. #6 0x7f9ba0404eb6 in svm_msg_q_try_lock (mq=0x204009440) at /home/ksekera/vpp/src/svm/message_queue.h:299 299 return pthread_mutex_trylock (>q->mutex); (gdb) p mq $1 = (svm_msg_q_t *) 0x204009440 (gdb) p mq->q $2 = (svm_queue_t *) 0x0 which

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

Klement, I just pulled the top-of-tree on master and ran only VCL tests on my 18.04 box and they all passed (see below).  Another strange thing about your failure is that the test that failed is NOT an extended test. I'm currently working on a patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13215/) to

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

: Klement Sekera via Lists.Fd.Io [mailto:ksekera=cisco@lists.fd.io] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 11:47 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master Hi all, I'm seeing failures on master branch on ubuntu 18.04 when invoking `make

[vpp-dev] test

test -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10508): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10508 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/25704537/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub

[vpp-dev] test-checkstyle breakage

Looks like they rev’d pycodestyle from 2.3.1 to 2.4.0 and with that upgrade the wheels have come off make test-checkstyle Total hack to lock the version back to 2.3.1 should be https://gerrit.fd.io/r/11667 if you/someone wanted that until you can beat 2.4.0 into shape Ed

[vpp-dev] test policer - result query

hi all， How can i get the policer name by sw_if_index when is_show==1 at ‘test_policer_command_fn‘ ? policer : name[mypolicer] cir[1000 kbps] intfc: GigabitEthernet2/6/0 sw_inf_index[1] I can only get the policer_index & 'policer_read_response_type_st' by rx_sw_if_index, but no

Re: [vpp-dev] Test scenario for VRF

o:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of mirzaei.reza > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 11:30 AM > To: Vpp Dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > Subject: [vpp-dev] Test scenario for VRF > > Hi > > I want to know is there any test scenario for VRF

[vpp-dev] Test scenario for VRF

Hi I want to know is there any test scenario for VRF using vpp? Best regards Reza___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

[vpp-dev] Test scenario for VRF

Hi I want to know is there any test scenario for VRF using vpp? Best regards Reza___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] Test job maybe not working correctly

Matt, Thanks for pointing this out.  There appears to be a bug in ci-management/jjb/vpp/vpp.yaml, where the node type is specified as 'ubuntu-s' instead of an os node (e.g. '{os}-basebuild-8c-32g'). - %< - - job-template:     name: 'vpp-test-poc-verify-{stream}-{os}'    

[vpp-dev] Test job maybe not working correctly

Hi, After submitting a rebased patch set this morning, I went and looked at the console output of one of the jenkins jobs that kicked off automatically. The job was named vpp-test-poc-verify-master-centos7. It caught my eye that the name of the job implies that it should be running on CentOS

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

o.com> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing Today I can't get a build +1 Verified. Different sort of errors and completely random... https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/7520/console 07:11:39 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

Tests.Vpp.Func.Ip6.Eth2P-Ethip6-Ip6Base-Ipolicemarkbase-Func - > > > > TC01: > > > > VPP policer 2R3C Color-aware marks packet > > > > 08:07:42 The VPP PIDs are not equal! > > > > 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': &g

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

al! > > > 08:07:42 Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9591, '10.30.52.215': 6792} > > > 08:07:42 Test Teardown VPP PIDs: {'10.30.52.214': 9863, '10.30.52.215': > > > 6792} > > > 08:07:42 | FAIL | > > > 08:07:42 Teardown failed: > > > 08:07:42 SSHTime

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

contents of stderr buffer: > > > > It seems that there was VPP restart during execution of this test. > > > > Regards, > > Jan > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11,

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

lto:marco.varl...@suse.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:49 > To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgel...@cisco.co > m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing &g

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

rds, Jan -Original Message- From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:49 To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgel...@cisco.com>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@list

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

marco.varl...@suse.com] > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 09:04 > To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgel...@cisco.co > m>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

, October 09, 2017 09:04 To: Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <jgel...@cisco.com>; Ed Kern (ejk) <e...@cisco.com> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-...@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing Please, take a look at this logs: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

> From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk) > Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07 > To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> > Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing > > could you t

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk) Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 17:07 To: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing could you throw me some example jobs? thanks, Ed > On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marc

Re: [vpp-dev] Test failing

could you throw me some example jobs? thanks, Ed > On Oct 6, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Marco Varlese wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have seen this many times these days... > I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken? > > The "recheck" is becoming the norm to

[vpp-dev] Test failing

Hi all, I have seen this many times these days... I wonder if it's a infra hiccup or something is really broken? The "recheck" is becoming the norm to get a clean +1 Verified... :( 14:32:52 14:00:32 TC04: VPP doesn't send DHCPv4 REQUEST after OFFER with wrong XID :: Configure DHCPv4 client on

[vpp-dev] Test failure due to resource unavailable

Dear held...@fd.io Please investigate the root cause of this resource failure during build phase of vpp-csit-verify-virl-master job: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/5805/console - %< - 21:37:41 CC vnet/map/ip6_map.lo 21:37:44 CC