I heard that Goat Herding is the new WO.
Alan
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>
> At least the WO union is in better shape than the united states… :(
>
>> On Oct 26, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Gino Pacitti wrote:
>>
>> I do not think I am the first to notice the lack of activity o
Alive and well.
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Flavio Donadio wrote:
>
> I am afraid of running with NSZombies enabled… ;-)
>
>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 11:11, Jérémy DE ROYER wrote:
>>
>> Is there anyone alive ?
>>
>> Jérémy
>>
>> ___
>> Do not post adm
I heard Trump say that he'd ban all Ruby on Rails developers from entering the
US and that WebObjects is in the state it's in because Tim refuses to actually
call it what is. I think he's also considering making Google pay for the wall
around Apple's garden (just as soon as he renounces the boy
I think Apple has abandoned WebObjects outside of Apple but not inside. Just my
personal opinion
Alan
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu wrote:
>
> I was reading this Wikipedia article.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware
>
> Would the list agree that WebObjects is now abandon
I think it would be great if we could get William Shatner to narrate it
Alan
> On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>
> If you get Chuck to do it, I’ll contribute!
>
>> On Jan 8, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
>>
>> How many beers will it take to get a book on tape version
ollow this list :)
>>
>> Paul
>> On Sep 17, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't think I'm giving anything away by saying that's a new DirectAction
>>> in an old app. MZFinance has been around since the launch
I still follow but often can't comment ;-)
On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Paul Yu wrote:
> Hi Alan
>
> wow, someone from Apple proper still follow this list :)
>
> Paul
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't think I&#x
I don't think I'm giving anything away by saying that's a new DirectAction in
an old app. MZFinance has been around since the launch in 2003.
On Sep 17, 2014, at 4:30 AM, Markus Ruggiero wrote:
> Folks,
> just in case you have missed it:
>
> https://buy.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZFinance.
I prefer "sunny side up" ;-)
On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On 2014-03-05, 1:23 PM, "Pascal Robert" wrote:
>
> It's not only Mike who was poached by Apple. Kieran, Miguel Arroz, Mark
> Ritchie, Q, Guido, the list is quite long.
>
> I think “poached” reflects the wrong attitu
What's Excel? I thought it was a car :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Excel
Alan
On Apr 3, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Dev WO wrote:
> I don't want to believe I'm the only one on this list to have to deal with
> Excel;)
> Any pointer/recommendation regarding the Excel generation column limit?
There are a bunch of Apple guys in the NYC area that do WebObjects development
too.
Alan
On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote:
> well then!
>
> let's have a local meet up or something --
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>
>> Who said that? I am…
>
Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm curious
where you are coming from here? Did you have a contract that obligated Apple
to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you have for a law
suit? I'm just curious.
Alan
On Mar 4, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Gaa
if ("POST".equals(request().method())) {
}
Alan
On Jan 23, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Klaus Berkling wrote:
> This question may be elementary, but...
>
> How can you tell if a form's submit method was POST or GET? I need to make
> sure that my form data was not submitted with GET, i.e. where the for
On Jul 6, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
>
>>> And being able to pick up a card and read it by interpreting the hole
>>> punches in your head was the geek's equivalent of winning the Super Bowl
>
On Jul 6, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Joel M. Benisch wrote:
> Oh how I miss the well defined structure of the RPG II processing cycle.
> Was so simple and elegant..
> And easy to learn!! :-)
>
> And being able to pick up a card and read it by interpreting the hole punches
> in your head was the gee
It's going to take 'em a while to get here if they're in the standard issue
Jeep ;-)
Alan
On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Alan, be advised that I've dispatched security to your office for breaking
> radio silence.
>
> ms
>
> On Jul
There are plenty of "insiders" on the list but I doubt any of them will give
you an "official" position.
Alan
On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Robert B. Hanviriyapunt wrote:
> Who, if anyone, represents Apple on this mailing list? When it comes to
> questions of open-sourcing WO or the availabi
This thread was a bit of a let down after a title like that.
On May 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Daniel Mejia wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I want to try your solution, but I can't find the Framework. I checked all
> the directories for the ProjectWonder 54, but I can't find it. I looked for
> the ERAttribute
I heard the parties often include goats
On May 6, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
> On the contrary, I haven't met a single one of you in person (yet) and from
> what I can tell you're just a bunch of drunks who plan a big party once a
> year.
>
> And, boy do I wish I could come. :-(
>
It almost amuses me that we having these WO scalability conversations now. 10
years ago it was a ballsy move to use
WO for a big online application. Now I think it's more "proven" than ever even
though the pace of development has
clearly scaled back. It's funny that none of the newer technol
y numb while
>> we kick back and relax.
>
> OK, the images I'm getting of you folks lounging around a pool sipping Mai
> Tais and waving palm fronds at one another is just way too creepy.
The reality is just as creepy as the image - just trust me on that one!
Alan
>
> T
Mike, couldn't you just have just left everyone with the cosy misconception
that
we wrote all this code 7 years ago, got it "right" first time and haven't had
to touch it since?
Alan
On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Michael Gargano wrote:
> "If you DO become iTunes, Google, or Twitter, your app
Wow. Talk about fud.
On Nov 5, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Karl wrote:
> I think that OS X server, as a product, is going away.
>
> Its probably just going to be an optional package to iOS ‘Lion’ sold for $79.
>
> Karl
>
> On 2010-11-05, at 4:39 PM, André Mitra wrote:
>
>> Yes, but will anyone with
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> IIRC, the issue is:
>>>
>>> EOEditingContext ec1
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
>>>
>>> Regardless, Miguel's not totally crazy :)
>>
>> Yet, my friend. Yet. Computers will kill me someday. And french routers too.
>
>
> French routers. Sounds like English automobiles.
Hey
to find out if something
outside of my app instance changed the data underneath me. If you think about
it like that then it works perfectly.
Inside my app instance I like to think that I know what's going on and don't
need any help from Optimistic Locking
but maybe I'm crazy.
Maybe I shouldn't ask but it's killing me not to. What exactly doesn't
work about it?
Alan
On Sep 24, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>> because OL doesn't work anyway ;)
> uh oh .. here he goes again :)
>
> ms
> ___
> Do not post admin
I don't even see how a race condition could cause that as both the variable and
the method are accessed several times
during the course of printing his debug output and [he claims] they both have
differing but consistent values. Bizarre.
Alan
On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>
>> The main problem is that every time someone is good at helping people and
>> with coding, Apple will snatch him.
>
> I'd like to think not everyone. ;-) Though they have tried.
You conti
On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Michael DeMan wrote:
> Well
>
> I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have
> expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost.
Why would you want them at low cost?
> It also has been a dying technology since NeXT got Apple back.
I
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I liked your grumpy response better ;-)
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's my sli
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:29 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> So the message is : Learn WO, be good at it, and you likely be able to get a
> job at Apple.
I believe quite a few people have done exactly that.
Alan
>
>> Apple develop stuff with a wide variety of tools based upon available
>> developer
I liked your grumpy response better ;-)
Alan
On Sep 10, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Here's my slightly less grumpy response :)
>
> Apple, like any smart company, makes technology decisions based on lots of
> variables -- what technology makes sense? what technology doesn't make sen
why is it not in the iBooks Store?
On Jun 22, 2010, at 6:15 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Hey all you iPad/iOS 4/Kindle(?) users out there, after a tweet from Q
> (http://twitter.com/qdolan/status/16755226170) I checked it out and Practical
> WebObjects (Chuck and Sacha's book) is available as
Mike's not going to disappear you know.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> 1+, Apple should only hire anonymous WO devs, not the ones who are actually
> helping the community :-)
>
>> No! don't take everyone from the list ;-)
>>
>> d
&
We're hiring.
Alan
On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> If you know WO and want to work at Apple, just ask them. I know they don't
> have enough skilled WO developers. I am not sure they could ever have enough.
>
>
> Chuck
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
Welcome aboard the mothership.
Alan
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> thanks everybody :)
>
> ms
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
>> Oh, and how rude of me... Congrats Mike! (^_^)
>>
>> Ramsey
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>>
On Feb 9, 2010, at 8:09 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
I am no sure that failing to acknowledge things like this is the
best route. Though I agree, speculation is not a good response.
Maybe something like this?
Q. Why does the Apple Store go down every time they release a major
product?
A.
Um, Johnny... I'm an Apple shareholder too and I'm pretty sure that
Apple's ROI on cash is above the current rate of inflation.
Can you point me to numbers that support your assertion that hoarding
cash results in losing money?
I'm just curious... I mean, you throw that out there like it's
...and you also don't know how many people within Apple would buy it
if Chuck was to write another book.
Alan
On Oct 23, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
BTW, the 400 devs count is from the total number of devs as told by
the results of the org survey, good chance that the communit
Speaking for myself here (and definitely not for my employer) I don't
see Apple using it's patent portfolio to generate cash but rather as a
counter defense against trolls. I'm just saying...
Alan
On Sep 15, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Q wrote:
On 16/09/2009, at 1:09 AM, André Mitra wrote:
you
I usually cache it in the EO itself but I also add a refreshCaches()
method that I call when
something modifies the object graph in such a way that the cached
relationships may be
out of date. The refreshCaches method simply nulls out the private
NSArray. The accessor
then checks for nul
On Jun 24, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 9:33 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Gustavo Adolfo Pizano wrote:
LOL!.
is it Chunk or Chuck ??.. no Im confused
It's Chunk!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_HeS453AeJDU/SdpjDGDAzyI/AMs/enp
It's a walk for anyone who's not lazy :-)
On Jun 3, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
By the map it looks like a taxi ride away.
On Jun 3, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Joe Little wrote:
Definitely 21st amendement. They can take an impromptu large party
and have lots of microbrews and food to samp
Mike,
are you calling us abnormal? ;-)
Alan
p.s. I could go either way on this topic. I think a rewrite rule is
the "easiest" but others may not. And if
you don't currently have any rewrite rules then it definitely adds a
new deployment wrinkle. I long for the
day when I once again de
Add a unique constraint to the database. That is the only way this
will work.
Your code below could return EOObjectNotAvailableException and then
another instance
inserts the row before your insert. The database is your friend
here. With the unique constraint
you don't need to fetch fir
I think you want something like
degree.list
PHD
MS
On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Joe Little wrote:
Previously, I had Property entries like:
degree.list = ("PHD", "MS")
My newer projects have XML-style plist files. I understand the basic
key/string layout for single assignments, but I c
On Sep 5, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 5, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:
Uhm, I've taken a peek at the API. Seems to have some interesting
stuff in there. Very AppKit like. I wonder what Apple would have
to say about that, legally. Still, 117 classes to cover
On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Nilton Lessa wrote:
On 21/08/2008, at 12:06, Alex Horovitz wrote:
On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Nilton Lessa wrote:
:-) In this report there are pearls like : "Webobjects is a
framework in disuse". ...sigh
In disguise??? Back when I was at NeXT we call
, at 10:54 AM, Gino Pacitti wrote:
But is this a BST thing and will it change with the clocks move back?
On 16 Aug 2008, at 17:48, Alan Ward wrote:
Looks to me like those dates are 20,000 years apart though, not
just 1 hour ;-)
Alan
On Aug 16, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Johann Werner wrote:
Hi
Looks to me like those dates are 20,000 years apart though, not just
1 hour ;-)
Alan
On Aug 16, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Johann Werner wrote:
Hi Gino,
this timeshift happens if you have different time zone settings for
your app and the database. It is commonly suggested to use GMT for
both
On Aug 15, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 15, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Sometimes the app is not the right level for solving the
problem. I do try to avoid things like this, but sometimes they
are the best solution.
Why would you choose this route rather than selec
On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:09 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:07 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
restrictedChoiceKey
Hmmm
Ahg! WOnder. Figures. :)
I was hopping for a WO-only solution.
Thanks for the quick reply though!
I thought The First Rule of D2W was "D2W without Wonder i
I missed the beginning of the thread but closing all your connections
is not that difficult...
for (Enumeration stores =
EOObjectStoreCoordinator.defaultCoordinator().cooperatingObjectStores
().objectEnumerator(); e.hasMoreElements();) {
for (Enumeration channels = ((EODatabaseCo
Thanks Steve, accept-charset is what I was trying to retrieve from my
murky memory. It's a long time
since I've worked with a browser ;-)
Alan
On Jun 24, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Steve Quirk wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Alan Ward wrote:
On Jun 24, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Kenny Leung wr
On Jun 24, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Kenny Leung wrote:
I've figured it out - you have to stick in a meta tag to force the
browser to use UTF-8. Something like.
Some stuff...
No, that tells the browser what encoding the page is in. Forms have
an "accept-encoding" tag which
t
EOEntity is your friend
Alan
On Jun 18, 2008, at 1:43 PM, James Cicenia wrote:
OK -
Is there a way I can get a list of every method and attribute?
Thanks
James
On Jun 18, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Robert Walker wrote:
Maybe I'm misinterpreting your question, but couldn't you just
make another E
On Jun 17, 2008, at 9:07 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Just asking: are you also providing a copy of WebObjects (which you
can't do according to the license).
If not, then why are you giving your users a lesson in copyright
law without being a lawyer? Why do you care at all? Is it not
Apple's bu
Ray,
Timing is everything. Clearly now is the time.
Alan
On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
It's killing me. One of my favorite jokes for when people ask me
(since I was in the WebObjects group at Apple for a bunch of years)
why Apple is so amazingly dense about WebObjects
On Jun 11, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
But I don't like reinventing the wheel. So I could adopt the
ERExtensions framework which I believe is all that's needed for
integrating Ajax into WebObjects. Or I could continue developing
my framework. Or I could wait to see what Apple i
On Jun 11, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Ricardo Parada wrote:
Ok, most of us have probably seen the mobile me web apps. They are
web 2.0 apps that use javascript and ajax. There's a lot of good
stuff in those apps. So much good stuff there. I wished Apple
made some of that stuff available to u
October 2003.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=43532
Alan
On Jun 10, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
Bloody hell! When did hell freeze over ?
Simon
On 10 Jun 2008, at 18:36, Mark Ritchie wrote:
Hi Everyone!
WebObjects Nightly Builds are now available on the ADC site
On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
To all,
This year Apple is happy to host, like last year, a WebObjects
Community Gathering during WWDC. This will be on Thursday June 12
from 4:30 to 6:30 pm in the "The Science and Medic
On May 30, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
So, my memory is still not 100% clear on this one but I think
we're honing in on why I don't flatten
If the relationship is not flattened then I have the option of not
using addObjectToBothSides if I know
I am doing an insert and then disca
On May 30, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
OK, so it sounds like the update is fine but how many SQL
statements occur when you try to insert a new Person?
I would expect an insert to fire the faults in this case, but that
should be the same for a many-to-many with a join entity as long
OK, so it sounds like the update is fine but how many SQL statements
occur when you try to insert a new Person?
Alan
On May 30, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
No, I meant an insert or update that didn't modify the
relationship. It sounds like your test shows my recollection to
be
On May 30, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I'm sure Chuck will correct me if I'm wrong but my
recollection is that a flattened to-many will always trip on
an insert or update.
Hmm. What you mean by "trip on"?
Pretty
On May 30, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I'm sure Chuck will correct me if I'm wrong but my recollection
is that a flattened to-many will always trip on an insert or
update.
Hmm. What you mean by "trip on"?
Pretty sure Alan is saying that updating or inserting an EO with
a flatten
I'm sure Chuck will correct me if I'm wrong but my recollection is
that a flattened to-many will always trip on an
insert or update.
Alan
On May 30, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 30.05.2008, at 14:31, Alan Ward wrote:
I actually omit joins from the model in certain
On May 30, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
IMHO you should never flatten a many-to-many (especially across
models).
So this is interesting ... I held this same belief for years until
about 6 months ago when Chuck convinced me that I was
I'm actually somewhat opposed to flattening in any situation but when
it comes to M-to-M
my justification is more performance related than anything else. I
actually omit joins from
the model in certain situations to avoid unwanted fetches and
flattening is more of a recipe
for disaster tha
IMHO you should never flatten a many-to-many (especially across models).
Alan
On May 30, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Gennady Kushnir wrote:
Flattening relationshops (consequently - many-to-many relations) does
not work across database (consequently - EOModel) boundaries
Unfortunately.
It is mentioned i
My guess is that you are doing the insert twice in the same
transaction. The transaction is then rolled back and consequently you
can manually insert the same values with no violation of the
uniqueness constraint. Turn on EOAdaptorDebugEnabled and
watch the SQL that's generated to get a be
On May 14, 2008, at 6:17 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
Leave it to the canadians to bring up beer.
Yeah, the Canadians are always bringing it up while the English are
keeping it down! :-)
Alan
Gotta love 'em. Count me in on the beer, WOWODC and WWDC.
Especially the beer.
Dave
On Ma
On May 14, 2008, at 3:52 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 14-May-08, at 5:44 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
And if you were still holding out to go to WOWODC and WWDC, WWDC
is sold out! Never thought I'd hear that...
iPhone mania!
Can't attend WWDC?
On May 14, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Patrick Robinson wrote:
I've got a question that I can't recall ever being addressed here.
Using https gets you encrypted/secure communication between yo
On May 14, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Patrick Robinson wrote:
I've got a question that I can't recall ever being addressed here.
Using https gets you encrypted/secure communication between your
users' browsers and your web server. But what do you all typically
do to secure communications between y
take a look at Lucene.
Alan
On Apr 30, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Joshua Paul wrote:
I need to generate a report that gathers information on a set of
objects (questions...as in Questions and Answers) and determines
which, if any, are similar to each other. I'm certain this will
involve 'stop word
Just be careful and make sure you don't pick up a can of that LSD
paint as that's often right next to the LCD stuff.
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Don Lindsay wrote:
Or use the new LCD paint and paint a wall in your office and make
it your monitor. :) Sweeet!
Don
On Apr 30, 2008, at 12:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
Am 29.04.2008 um 04:53 schrieb Don Lindsay:
I agree. Not really sure who they are selling these to. I work
with Government and Fortune 500 companies they and I know I could
not get 20k*2=40K past them, we could purchase a hell of a se
f static and dynamic content"
Having been bitten by webperfcache doing that, I am curious if you
have seen WO used on one of these? I am curious as to how dynamic
content caching works.
Chuck
On Apr 28, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
http://www.citrix.com/english/ps2/product
ster.co.uk/2008/04/28/citrix_netscaler_mpx/
Cheers,
Jake
On 29/04/2008, at 7:17 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Chuck Hill wr
of Netscaler before Alan mentioned it on this list
- but then I saw this in my morning RSS feeds:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/28/citrix_netscaler_mpx/
Cheers,
Jake
On 29/04/2008, at 7:17 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Ch
On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
"caching of static and dynamic content&quo
On Apr 28, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
"caching of static and dynamic content"
Having been bitten by webperfcache doing that, I am curious if
you have seen WO used on on
sed for caching, only for request routing and SSL.
Alan
Chuck
On Apr 28, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
http://www.citrix.com/english/ps2/products/product.asp?
contentID=21679
you don't need to run wotaskd if you run your apps behind one of
these. I'm not saying
you sho
http://www.citrix.com/english/ps2/products/product.asp?contentID=21679
you don't need to run wotaskd if you run your apps behind one of
these. I'm not saying
you should get one just that it's an option that I* believe is
better/faster/stronger than
Tomcat (which was your original quest
um, how about using an NSMutableArray? NSArray is immutable and does
not implement add.
Alan
On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:18 AM, Juergen Lorenz Simon wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to implement a simple web service. One of the
webservice operations takes an NSArray as parameter.
publ
always the joker ;-)
On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Hugi Þórðarson wrote:
How extreme do you want to get? You can work some wonders with your
HTML in dispatchRequest
Personally, I find that this generates the cleanest possible response:
public WOResponse dispatchReqcuest( WORequest request )
I believe the problem is that Microsoft has never really considered
what the distantFuture may have in store for them.
One of these days they'll have a sudden awakening
:-)
Alan
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:22 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
I ended up implementing my own "DistantFuture" method i
On Apr 13, 2008, at 3:35 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 12/04/2008, at 6:24 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
I think the real bug-bear for people struggling to get their
companies to commit to webobjects isn't the fact that it's not
o
company in
Guildford, Surrey in '89 when they
moved me out to San Francisco. Been in the US ever since. I live in
Boulder, CO now though
but I still work for Apple (from home).
Alan
Simon
On 12 Apr 2008, at 02:22, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
wo
On Apr 11, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
wow, so you must have made it to california by sail ? well done
captain pierre :-)
Yes, Pierre's older than I thought :-)
...unless he was into horse racing. I believe race horses are
still sold in guineas. the extra 5% covers the
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:47 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
I think the real bug-bear for people struggling to get their
companies to commit to webobjects isn't the fact that it's not
open source - i think it's the fact that you have to buy a mac
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
Hi Pierre -
Thanks for replying - unfortunately not all of us make it to WWDC!
When you say "fix bugs for other platforms" is that because of bugs
in other platforms JRM ? I don't see how you can have a bug in a
java framework that doesn't
On Apr 9, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
The thing I don't understand is, how were you using WO without
using EOF? Were you using just the presentation layers?
It's quite simple, just don't include any EOF models. I have written
a couple of WO apps in the past that have no
On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Robert B. Hanviriyapunt wrote:
I can ask about WWDC08.
The answer will probably be no since the decision was made quite a
long time ago (hard to de-couple it right now tho, so it will
definitely be a while).
Still the 3 issues I mentioned aren't going away, ar
that too ;-)
On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:43 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
It's done with thought control
I was going to guess that Apple's mail server randomly inserts that
comment into all outgoing emails ...
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. Th
I knew someone would get a "WO is dead" comment onto the list somehow
but I honestly thought it would be in response
to the WWDC calendar. That one was out of left field! Mike, I've
been working with WO for almost a decade and I've seen
it much weaker than it is right now.
Alan
On Apr 8,
It's done with thought control
On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
#1 music retailer in the world?
Do you guys all have a new key combination to insert that statement
with ease ? :-)
Simon
___
Do not post admin requests to the
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
