Thanks, Minh...
Mayank
From: Minh Phan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:22 PM
To: Mayank Otia
Cc: wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com
Subject: RE: [Wengophone-devel] SIP messages while registering.
Now one quick question.So, it is n
Now one quick question.So, it is not concerned with registration process
(which is REGISTER(without credentials)->407->REGISTER(with
credentials)->200), right?
Yeah, nothing to do with that sequence.
Minh
_
From: Mayank Otia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mardi 13 mars 2007 1
Hi Mayank,
That message is sent in order to detect local network configuration. It is
not the REGISTER for your Wengo SIP account. If we receive a response from
the server in reply to that register message, we then know that we can
connect directly to the SIP server. Otherwise, we may need to u
Hi,
I was looking at the SIP message flow from Wengophone, using WireShark,
and I saw a REGISTER message which contains "nobody@" in the From and To
filed. This occurs everytime I Login with Wengo. Can anybody explain me
why is it sending without my wengo account name?
Thanks,
Mayank Otia
_
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd love to collect links to contributed binary builds for varioous
> Linux distributions in the wiki (following GlaDiaC's lead for OpenSuse).
>
> Have a look at http://dev.openwengo.com/trac/openwengo/trac.cgi/wiki and
On 3/13/07, Pirmin Walthert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, wrong key pressed and mail sent instead of inserting the link :)
Here is the link:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/75724
I think what we really need is a bug filed _upstream_. If we are sure
this is a boost proble
Hi Atanas,
Thanks for your report, it will help to improve WengoPhone. Could you
create Trac tickets for bugs you reported on http://
dev.openwengo.org. This is the best way to report bugs. However be
sure that there is not already a ticket describing a bug.
Regards
--
Philippe BERNERY <[
Sorry, wrong key pressed and mail sent instead of inserting the link :)
Here is the link:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/75724
I did this test with the Feisty 4.1-GCC and with my self-compiled
4.0-GCC. With 4.1 the same error, with 4.0 it worked.
I have my 4.0-version from h
Hi Dave
Here is the link you already know (because you made an entry there):
On Die, 2007-03-13 at 14:22 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pirmin Walthert wrote:
> > For everyone who wants to make packages for Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty):
>
> 7.04 is Edgy Eft, Feisty Fawn is the future 7.10 release.
Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pirmin Walthert wrote:
>> For everyone who wants to make packages for Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty):
>
> 7.04 is Edgy Eft, Feisty Fawn is the future 7.10 release.
Oops - of course, I'm getting ahead of myself, and this is wrong. 7.04
is indeed Feisty 6.10 was Edgy, and 6.06 is
Hi,
Pirmin Walthert wrote:
> For everyone who wants to make packages for Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty):
7.04 is Edgy Eft, Feisty Fawn is the future 7.10 release.
> - As you may know from older discussions Gcc-4.1 doesn't like Boost! =>
> Boost-Libraries seem to compile ok but do not work correctly!
I'v
Hi,
Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> Are you also willing to host them? I surely have not enough BW avaliable...
For you? Probably ;)
>> Gianluca, Marco, Nicolas, Jeff, any chance you've gotten around to
>> making binaries for your distros?
>
> My attempt to build 2.1rc1 failed because of the missing
Hi
For everyone who wants to make packages for Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty):
Before you also loose hours on getting compilation to work on Feisty
I've a few notes for you:
- As you may know from older discussions Gcc-4.1 doesn't like Boost! =>
Boost-Libraries seem to compile ok but do not work correctly
On 3/13/07, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd love to collect links to contributed binary builds for varioous
Linux distributions in the wiki (following GlaDiaC's lead for OpenSuse).
Are you also willing to host them? I surely have not enough BW avaliable...
Gianluca, Marco, Nicolas,
Michel,
To clarify what I wrote below: I've tested with recent builds and the
history for your examples will show only 500 or toto. (I'm not logged into
Wengo when I do this, but into sipalive.com), so I'm not sure if wengo (the
service, not the phone) supports calling to other SIP providers.
> Date: Tuesday 13 Mar 2007
> From: Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gianluca, Marco, Nicolas, Jeff, any chance you've gotten around to
> making binaries for your distros?
Gialu,
Although I still have many issues with my debug build, I'd be happy to build a
FC6 rpm for x86_64 from your rpm src
On 07/03/07, Lukas Oberhuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've seen problems like this where the other proxy was wanting to
register and the proxy you are registered is not able to respond. Are you
sure this is not the case here?
Sorry do you mean , if I use a SIP account and the wengo account
Hi all,
I'd love to collect links to contributed binary builds for varioous
Linux distributions in the wiki (following GlaDiaC's lead for OpenSuse).
Have a look at http://dev.openwengo.com/trac/openwengo/trac.cgi/wiki and
if you have a link to a .rpm or .deb for your distribution, then please
ad
Great ! Thanks for all the infos , I should have checked in the directory a
name contening speex ...
I did not really understood how G726 and speex are close but I'll check
about it . As long as it works with another softphone thta has speex in
highest codec priority list, It's good
Thanks Mathi
> I just tested last revision 10240 on WindowsXP , in the config audio page,
> no speex . Is speex included in all platforms ?
Yep, speex is included in all plateforms, actually speex's name is replaced by
G726-64wb/16000 (Wengo network specific issue)
I'll add a gui hack to present speex to the
On 13/03/07, Mathieu Stute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:21, Mathieu Stute wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 19:11, michel memeteau wrote:
> > Hi I 've seen tou've updated the build environnement few weeks ago ,
But
> > now On any platform it seems that Speex is not here ,
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:21, Mathieu Stute wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2007 19:11, michel memeteau wrote:
> > Hi I 've seen tou've updated the build environnement few weeks ago , But
> > now On any platform it seems that Speex is not here , then PCMU is used
> > all the time .
> >
> > Is this a f
22 matches
Mail list logo
