Does any one have any recent experience with squid cashing server software
http://www.squid-cache.org/
One of our customers set it up across their network and thought it was
"super easy to set up" and "doing a bang up job for about 300 users".
Is there any real world experience out there?
Will
Personally, all I have seen are last generation. What I'd like to know is
which have evolved to tackle the trends of newer network designs.
How many support multiple outbound paths correctly? Are any multi-layer
yet, from the perspective of doing bandwdith management per sector attached
to it,
I totally agree. I have known about Michael's plan to go pay for about a
week now. He was going to make the announcement in Salt Lake City on
Thursday. But I guess he wanted to break it today so there wouldn't be so
much shock at the show.
I truly wish him the best too. I have used his list
Question, since I have not previously been monitoring wispa, how tolerant is
the wispa group to folks like me dropping hints about new products or AF or
things like that? I read all the rules and mission statements etc of wispa
and don't want to go against convention. Is there a list blast her
If the 'other' list is the part-15 list. I think you will see the
private lists drop down to the core part-15 members. Michael was talking
about having one general list open to everyone and you will probably see
more people there. But for the experienced operators (the people that
answer the qu
I'm wondering the same thing, Chuck. It is such a good list, so many answers
can be had. I am going to try and talk the boss man into paying for it, but
I don't know if he will. It's really amazing what he will/wont spend money
on...
WISPA should create Vendor specific lists
Mike Bushard, Jr
DFcco.com
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wireless Network Engineer
320-256-WISP (9477)
320-256-9478 Fax
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:45 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] sources
Hi,
Where i
Hi,
I don't seem to be able to log in to reset the listserv to send me a digest
daily. Can you advise what to do?
Thank you Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:14 AM
To:
WiMax is sure getting lots of press. Especially at CES. Funny, they are
talking up the Sprint roll out but Sprint has bailed. Still smoke and
mirrors compared to Canopy but I guess we might as well capitalize on the
buzz.
While blathering on here, a business mentor told me long ago to contri
The only benefit of 3.65 is, "additional spectrum". And that will get
used up fairly quickly I'm sure.
We need more.
John Valenti wrote:
> I ran across this study a few weeks back:
> http://www.bsu.edu/owrm/article/0,,47997--,00.html
>
> Reading the executive summary, in their real wo
I didn't say we said we were WiMAX. I said :
" well, this is what we do" "we use microwave to reach you rather than
use the telephone or cable company".
And then I sometimes also say " What we have been doing , going into our
10th year here, is what WiMAX is all about".
Sometimes people actual
Yes Chuck the behives are loud and clear
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
> From: Chuck McCown - 2
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:44 PM
> Subject: test
>
>
> I think I subscribed but have never monitored WISPA before today. Is ?this
> list alive? Is there a [EMA
I ran across this study a few weeks back:
http://www.bsu.edu/owrm/article/0,,47997--,00.html
Reading the executive summary, in their real world tests, NLOS/indoor
radios only worked about one mile. Outdoor mounted radios worked
maybe five miles. (I wasn't too impressed, in comparison
I guess as long as your over the air protocol conforms to 802.16 you can say
you are WiMax.
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service
I find myself referring to WiMAX when describing our service.
We use the term "broadband" to describe our service. When asked to
explain the difference between our broadband and the others, it's
getting easy to say "you have heard of WiMAX right?" " well this is what
we do" "we use microwave to
From: Chuck McCown - 2
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:44 PM
Subject: test
I think I subscribed but have never monitored WISPA before today. Is ?this
list alive? Is there a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
I'm sure you don't want to turn this into a why you should use X thread,
but I am curious what you are having problems limiting with the other
devices you have tried?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
John Scrivner wrote:
> I have been considering the Net Equalizer as a possible platform for
> b
I found that Tessco has the size (pipe width) that are the same as Trango
Dish Arms. We prefer that size.
To summarize, we prefer the smaller base with the thicker pole, but most
only sell the thicker pole with the huge thicker base, and the smaller width
pole with the smaller base.
So when we
Wimax APs can go much fartehr than 2-5 miles.
You are spec'ing the distance limits of their advanced NLOS features.
In LOS, they can go just as far as any other unlicened gear.
I think its important to define country. If you are talking about Idaho
with houses 20 miles apart, yes, you'd be corre
> It's only practical implementation is a dense urban environment with low
> throughput
I have a very hard time accepting that comment.
3.650 is more power than other unlicenced.
3.650 has better RF characteristics than 5.8G for NLOS and Distance.
Possibly even better than 2.4G (up for debate,
Ok, I was thinking maybe someone had a mount shaped like a j that got
you around the eve or something.
I buy the ones you just posted myself. usually the long ones.
Travis Johnson wrote:
> The "universal mounts" that are often used with satellite TV installs.
> It has a flat foot with a pipe
The "universal mounts" that are often used with satellite TV installs.
It has a flat foot with a pipe that is bent in the shape of a J.
http://www.pacwireless.com/products/UM.shtml
Travis
Microserv
George Rogato wrote:
What is a J mount?
got a picture by chance?
Travis Johnson wrote:
What is a J mount?
got a picture by chance?
Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where is everyone buying their "J-mounts" for doing installs? I use
> about 100 per month and my previous source no longer carries them.
>
> thanks,
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
>
> -
Mike Hammett wrote:
> Preferred vendor for vent pipe mounts?
>
>
Plumbing supply store. Buy a coupling the right size and type.
I should say, not all vent pipe mounts need the vent extended. And
sometimes, we can slip the cat 5 cable under the roof jack and into the
attic.
I wouldn't be addi
Hi,
Where is everyone buying their "J-mounts" for doing installs? I use
about 100 per month and my previous source no longer carries them.
thanks,
Travis
Microserv
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa
Jake,
We use Option 82 insertion for our IPTV network. Our set-top boxes are
DHCP and upon a lease request Option 82 gives our DHCP server more
information regarding our set-top boxes configuration like
IP/MAC/Multicast info and TFTP server info for updating software.
Regular DHCP would simply
Preferred vendor for vent pipe mounts?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vent pipe installs?
> W
We do it all the time with rootennas.
Even extend the pipe up with a coupling and glue.
Dave Brenton wrote:
> Gang,
>
> I'm FINALLY entering shake-down mode here and
> now I've thinking more about stuff that I've not considered.
>
> Have many of you mounted your CPE gear to customers
> roof-top
Exactly.
What good is an AP that can only do 15 megs throughput in the city?
What good is an AP that can only do 2 - 5 miles in the country?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WI
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai
> NetFlows will tell you exactly who you need to conn
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX Service
> Redl
I guess I am a bit perplexed by this premise. Why would people in urban
areas pay for low bandwidth wireless broadband options? What problem
does this platform solve under that scenario?
Scriv
Mike Hammett wrote:
> I would like to note that Redline echoed my thoughts on 3.65 GHz. It is not
>
I would like to note that Redline echoed my thoughts on 3.65 GHz. It is not
for rural providers and is not for high bandwidth providers. It's only
practical implementation is a dense urban environment with low throughput
clients.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.
Part-15 has decided to charge for their mailing lists. I have
created a Mikrotik mailing list (information below). I will be
willing to create any other lists (even for gear I don't use) if
people will simply ask for it. You can email me directly if you
wish to have a list created. Mikrotik
Same here. In addition to that we had a problem with our unit causing slow
ups on our network. Dealing with support was terrible.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jake VanDewater
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:33 PM
To: WISPA Gener
There are a number of WiMAX 3.5 GHz solutions that will tune to 3.65
just fine. I doubt that we would need to force the forum to issue a new
profile for a frequency band that existing profiles already cover. As
far as I am concerned WiMAX in 3.65 GHz is here in all respects and is
not just mark
Tom,
I'd agree. I'm in no way advocating marketing that is deceptive in terms of
deliverables.
My main point is more that communications in marketing often involves using
buzzwords that coopt something someone knows for describing your product.
Even if that is, on a technical level, incorrect, on
I too would say the same. Initially they did a good job, but soon after
they began to be in effective and variable. We contacted them and got very
little satisfaction. so, we are now trying mikrotiks at every tower. like
a 333... details will follow with our success or failure. We have
imp
We purchased a NetEqualizer last year, and we weren't impressed. It did not
perform well compared to the Emerging Technologies box we use. The rate limits
were not effectively enforced.
-Jake
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:16:46 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subjec
Has anyone implemented the DHCP Option 82 on their networks? From what I have
read, this would be great for forcing network addressable bridges to handout a
specified IP address and/or range of IPs.
_
Make distant family not so d
I have been considering the Net Equalizer as a possible platform for
bandwidth management. I know that topics like this often lead to a
myriad of posts about bandwidth management normally. If possible I would
like to hear feedback from people who have actually used this one
appliance to hear ab
First, two thumbs up for Matt. 1) He's leading the way to expand with new
technologies. 2) He's clever enough to use maximize how he uses of Press
Releases.
With that said, in response to Clint, I had mixed feelings regarding the
release.
I didn't see a problem listing "Wimax" in the press re
Depends what kind of vent pipe, I would not recommend mounting to PVC
pipes with any type of extension of additional pipe. We tried once and
customer complained when it got windy it would make noise through the
entire home. However, we successfully mount to Cast Iron vent pipes
often with no probl
Gang,
I'm FINALLY entering shake-down mode here and
now I've thinking more about stuff that I've not considered.
Have many of you mounted your CPE gear to customers
roof-top vent pipes?
If so are there any down-sides to doing so?
It seems like a pretty stable mount to me
but if there's a good r
44 matches
Mail list logo