Netflix and TiVo are getting together.. more bandwidth anybody? Labor and
postage gone, and we deliver it (nearly free) at the customer expense !
http://tinyurl.com/6286v8
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
I would ask them what a permissible level would be, then I would give them
some average levels of exposure due to cell phone and microwave oven leakage
(and wireless routers, maybe) showing them to be thousands of times higher
than the wisp gear. You could always put up an AP and use a
?
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 8:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re
Looks like Tim Hogard's basement to me.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:00 AM
Subject: [WISPA] NOC
Here's a NOC...
We have tried the full sized nanostations. They have an external SMA
connector so you can put an antenna on them with some decent gain.
I would pay the extra for the full sized unit just to have that option.
They do what they say they will do. But just like all 802.11x products,
you have to
of them and my guess is that the first round that makes it to the
states is going to be beta.
Just like any 802.11a product, the NS5s will run circles around Canopy
if properly deployed. So yeah, you can consider them as a Canopy
replacement. :^)
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Chuck McCown
yeah, you can consider them as a Canopy
replacement. :^)
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Chuck McCown wrote:
We have tried the full sized nanostations. They have an external SMA
connector so you can put an antenna on them with some decent gain.
I would pay the extra for the full sized unit just
World .. might
wanna ask him ;-)
-drew
Chuck McCown wrote:
I hear rumors of a stinger like antenna being developed for the NS2...
- Original Message -
From: Matt Larsen - Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:59 AM
AF09?
On 10/22/08, Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure he can make AF09... right Gino?
Is Ubiquity going to be there?
- Original Message -
From: Ben Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:20 AM
think the Nanostation has the horsepower to do 20Mbps, do they?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Nanostations.
- Original Message -
From: Cooper Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA
I think I would fire the bad ones off to the manufacturer for a failure
analysis. Sounds like a nasty trend developing.
If they are honorable and actually care about remaining in the business they
would cooperate and offer to repair or replace all your other ones before
they all fail (assuming
We always did 5 feet plus 10% of all poles longer than 20 feet.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wood Pole Towers (Was: Re: Trylon Titan Foundation
Work)
And it will have a metal tag or stamped into the wood in that area something
like:
4-40
or 5-25
The first number is the class and the second is the length in feet.
- Original Message -
From: D. Ryan Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October
Nanostations.
- Original Message -
From: Cooper Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Recommendations for equipment to create 15 mile 20 Mbit
PtPlink?
What unlicensed gear would you suggest to create
that again.
(ex linesman here)
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] old utility poles
We use them at times. That is a pretty good price
the
crap out of me.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] old utility poles
I still have my hooks and belt.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon
Around here it takes a geotechnical soils report ($600-1200)
Wet stamped foundation drawing showing a foundation design for this area,
wind load and siesmic conditions ($800-$1200)
Then paying for the building permit showing the licensed general
contractor's license number.
We can have more
, no truck roll installs. That is a dream I would like to make into a
reality :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
We use them at times. That is a pretty good price if they are in good
enough shape to climb.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:09 AM
Subject: [WISPA] old utility poles
Anyone using
How tight do you want it?
I make a very sharp waveguide BPF for 5.8.
I'll attach the response curve.
- Original Message -
From: Jon Langeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:48 AM
Subject: [WISPA] 5.5Ghz highpass/lowpass
2.4, 5.2, 5.4 and 5.8GHz
(sorry, feeling like a smarta** today)
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:59 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Interference at the neighbors
Just curious, how are you
?
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.5Ghz highpass/lowpass filters?
How
I used to give one month free with the referral, plus a free install and one
month free for the new customer.
We had more installs in those days than we could service.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday,
We always assume we will get a signal. We are rarely wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update - Tranzeo/Mtik
disconnectissueOct7th, 2008
So
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
We always assume we will get a signal. We are rarely wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update - Tranzeo
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update-Tranzeo/Mtik
disconnectissueOct7th, 2008
Now Chuck, I have to believe you do a little bit more than assume knowing
how much you already know about RF ... :-)
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
] NOGO's
Wow Chuck! You've got it covered! How may square miles dor you service?
-RickG
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1% or less
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
... :(
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
We always assume we will get a signal. We are rarely wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Tranzeo] New Update
foot pine trees surrounding most homes on all sides. :(
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Nope. When you have about 65 APs up on high ground looking down into your
service territory and totally surrounding it, you can serve everyone.
- Original Message -
From: Brian
Yes, the normal float voltage for flooded cell batts is 2.25 VPC. For a 48
Volt battery that is 24 cells x 2.25 = 54 volts. Some folks charge at 55
volts.
Then during discharge, some consider 1.8 VPC to be the lower limit. 24 x 1.
= 43.2 volts. I personally like 44 volts as the lower limit.
Nope, but I know plenty of consultants.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
Splitting hairs Chuck.
If it's government mandated
A judge ordered the FCC to issue a decision on the intercarrier compensation
reform. Not sure the docket number, but they have to issue something in
November. There is a date certain. They can decide to not change anything.
Or they can decide to radically reform the whole works. If they do
. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
In all honesty, it's turned into quite a scam hasn't it. About is rampant
from what I see.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck
PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
Just because the government will pay for it in no way makes it a good idea
:-).
Chuck is good at working the system as it exists for his industry. I
can't
fault
The current USF audits by USAC are turning up collusion between school
districts (the principle is the brother of the local ISP) and provider of
goods and services of E-rate funded projects. The audits have not shown any
telephone company to be misusing this money.
And I want to repeat, this
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
Tacking a fee on my telephone bill is a form of taxation. -RickG
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current USF audits by USAC
Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
Chuck, so your definition of a tax is if you are forced to pay?
Keeping in mind that the phone system was developed as a public
USF
If you are running a hundred miles of fiber for 30 people you are not
right in the head...
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
It is a cost recovery mechanism. I got audited by USAC this year to
prove
that the USF we receive is to cover the costs of providing the service.
But
think
that the services cost.
Now RUS is financing Crossroads, a mostly redundant and unnecesary
cellular network meant to benefit the ILECs who are not verizon.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:11:27AM -0600, Chuck McCown wrote:
The phone system was not developed by tax dollars.
It was developed by guys like Art
It is a cost recovery mechanism. I got audited by USAC this year to prove
that the USF we receive is to cover the costs of providing the service. But
think how expensive it is to run a hundred miles of fiber and put in a class
5 switch to serve 30 or 50 customers.
You are right, I do love
WOW! Marlon, hire David, He gets results, fast !
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hardy
Sent: Tuesday, October 07
Vector Network Analyzer. Anritsu makes a nice one. Plus some test
antennas. But you will be spending $6K and above.
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: [WISPA] small RF testing
represented that
they can make them. But I don't
see
part numbers listed. I'd love to see
these in the sub $300 range.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED
One of the quickest and easiest ways is the Wilife system. I think Logitech
owns the company now. It has relatively inexpensive but very smart cameras
and some stealth cameras (clock radio camera) etc. It communicates with the
computer via the power line (homeplug). Very simple to install.
A dual pol panel antenna can be an order of magnitude more difficult to make
than a single linear polarized antenna. Almost all panel antennas are
either an array of patches or an array of butterfly dipole elements over a
ground plane. Most designers are trying to put as much gain in the area
At 2000 feet a paper clip would work.
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Dual Pol Antennas
All this talk about Dual Pol feedhorns has got me curious
I'm looking for a dual pol
That is included in the 5.4 band.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Delp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Part 15 Frequency Chart
I am looking for an up to date chart with all of the unlicensed
Even if Powercode was a vendor sponsor of WISPA (not sure one way or the
other), openly hawking product on the general WISPA list seems to be frowned
upon.
- Original Message -
From: Austin Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September
and encrypted, these for $200.
Travis, try one of these in a difficult spot, I'm sure you will like it.
$139.00
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Ruckus media flex
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 5:54 PM
To: WISPA General
Sometimes. A NECA ILEC has the choice.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 8:11 PM
Subject: [WISPA] DSL Tariffed
I'm losing a business customer to DSL. They offered them a price much
below
Unlicensed 24 GHz has so little power that it is only good for a mile or
two. Is that still an attractive thing?
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Huge diff between SA and Nigeria...
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
In the case of South Africa I
The good ones are always in Nigeria...
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
Is it just me, or do African wireless opportunities rarely
We were in Sakhalin Island in Russia. The government just up and decided to
take over everything. Booted out the oil companies and said finders
keepers to everyone. I will never do any intl work again without full
money up front.
- Original Message -
From: Rogelio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Couple of years ago.
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
Ouch! When did that happen Chuck?
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
worked for them, they were part of the
consortium developing Sakhalin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your
or a Russia thing... but
come to think of it I think I did hear something about Russia doing that a
few years back
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:06 PM
in here some where...
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Russia, the New Soviet Union.
- Original Message -
From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] your thoughts on opps in Africa?
I
in Africa?
I have heard of that happening on native lands here in the US too. I have
nothing to confirm that though.
ryan
-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
They all suck for latency.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
will be the people with a
BIG warehouse somewhere holding one end of each entangled particle pair
and routing between them.
Until then, I'll be happy to take the bet right alongside Chuck that any
geostationary based satellite service will have a ping time in the
hundreds of milliseconds.
-forrest
If you had a really tiny monkey with really tiny hands and had them actually
grab one of the entangled photons, bring it to a rest and then shake it in
the opposite polarization, will the other monkey holding the other photo
feel the change?
- Original Message -
From: Forrest W.
I fully expect them to run into the same brick wall the prevents reverse
time travel.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite internet
Forrest W.
We are a general contractor with 10 million I think. That much insurance is
not all that expensive.
Any general contractor should be able to buy a one time rider to their
policy to bump up the coverage.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Canopy NAT and bootP filtering works like a champ to stop the mistake from
causing problems upstream.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Preventing backwards
They all suck for latency.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 3:52 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Satellite internet
I have a customer looking for enterprise quality ( his words) satellite
service. Money is
God bless Mac. There will be prayers.
- Original Message -
From: Mac Dearman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Golly Gustav
Well - - - here we (Louisiana) are again in the eye of a
I guess I could reverse the polarity of a 333SS. Do you know how much
current the POE would be drawing?
- Original Message -
From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Motorola Canopy User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Will Canopy Surge work with 48v Redline?
They use the PowerDsine midspan poe...not sure
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess I could reverse the polarity of a 333SS
, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Will Canopy Surge work with 48v Redline?
how much?
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Our 333ss has leds for monitoring voltage and current. But the circuit
is
fine tuned to Canopy SMs.
I could reverse
the wires, discover the speed, enjoy the freedom!
*US Distributor for www.itelite.net Antennas*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:54 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Running
I am a rural telecom, one of the most rural in the nation. And I wasn't
exempt at all.
- Original Message -
From: Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I want to port their numbers
But if you are selling voip, you want the local ILEC customer to be able to
keep their number.
In that case the ILEC has involvement.
- Original Message -
From: cw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I
I don't think that exemption applied to LNP. It did for a while to keep
CLECs out of the rural areas but that has now sunset.
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Will [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
a interconnect with the other carrier in
order to port the number. More to the point, VOX probably is reselling
Level3 or whoever that doesn't have an interconnect with the local LEC
and therefore can't port.
-Matt
On Aug 26, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I am a rural telecom
as a customer. We appreciate your business.
You can call the office and ask for me directly at 256/638-2144, or you may
speak to any of our CSRs at the same number.
Sincerely,
Chris Townson
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL
should have picked this up before Chuck, but what is the
animal
farm event?
Yes if I can contibute and work it out with my schedule, what ever it is.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Tuesday, August 26
--
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:25 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Emergency FCC Information - Florida
DIsasterArea
Do you really think the FCC has specified P-15
Do you really think the FCC has specified P-15 to the be the official
conduit for status reports?
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Emergency FCC
Used to be 200 kbps and above. But now everybody has to file.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Reminder
Please define
Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Employee Tracking Program
Not true. Employers own the content of all
If that is what it cost me, I would never be able to afford it.
Good thing it only costs me about $1K per sub.
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fiber Costs
BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:49:24
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
Elliptical waveguide will lose 3 dB in 250 feet.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brownson [EMAIL
130 feet on 5.8 through LMR 900 = serving about 20% of the area you could
serve if the coax was not in place.
I guess it depends on what folks call working.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
Star cpes
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed Broadband
to Rural Central California
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 8:37 AM
To: WISPA General
Not true. Employers own the content of all correspondence, whether
electronic or otherwise.
That has been time tested.
Plus, in this state we can record the phone calls. We can record you on the
phone without even notifying you if we call you or if you call us.
- Original Message -
We can buy the ONT for $375.
The COE per sub works out to about another $200.
So $500 plus the strand of fiber. Drop fiber can be had for 25 cents per
foot.
Contractors can put it in for a buck a foot. Including cleanup.
In a subdivision, I can do FTTH for less than $1K per sub.
And my arpu
We make 'em sign a statement saying they have read the employee handbook.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Employee Tracking Program
In Missouri its only
Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
Dude
That is not what I was commenting on. You made the following blanket
statement regarding radio links
I would never use coax for 5.8 period. Not unless you are only going a few
feet.
LMR900 can be used for up to 50 feet. It is better than 1/2 heliax. But
really, you gotta use waveguide if you are going any distance at all.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elliptical waveguide will lose 3 dB in 250 feet.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brownson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] coax cables
To give you the facts. You can use just about any coax you
YES, But how are you setting the rate for the interconnect or vlan to
connect customers sites together over your network or between your towers.
Do you base it on the cost of lease lines, fractional t-1's, etc.
Chuck Profito
209-988-7388
CV-ACCESS, INC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing High Speed
That is near muddy frog's territory.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:30 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Anyone service Pasco Wa.?
We're at 2731 Birch Rd., Pasco.
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC geographic search
Chuck,
What exactly are you having problems with? Any FCC ULS searches have been
a
crap shoot for me. Much of the time I find that for any queries to work
well, you need to be as simple as possible. It seems
Telecommunications Act of 1996 on Zoning for Mobile Communications
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (S.652)
Section 704
FACILITIES SITING;
RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION STANDARDS.
(a) NATIONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITING POLICY- Section 332(c) (47
U.S.C. 332(c)) is amended by adding at the end
SEC. 253. [47 U.S.C. 253] REMOVAL OF BARRIERS TO ENTRY.
(a) IN GENERAL.--No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or
local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the
ability of
any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.
Note that in Section 332 unlicensed services is explicitly mentioned and
included in the definition of personal wireless services.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
There are about 4 parts of federal code that allows the use, but it does not
get you out of the process. Planning cannot deny you but you still have to
apply for the conditional use permit. They will have a hearing for the
public to have a chance to comment, but at the end of the day you will
You gotta get a better lawyer. Some of this stuff, especially RF emissions
are federally regulated and wholly prempts local officials. It is actually
easier if you call your facility cellular like in most cases because federal
code can get most of this off your back. The building
1001 - 1100 of 1534 matches
Mail list logo
