Re: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

fect us - but we don’t know what they are going to do since they have not > started yet. > > Mark Radabaugh > WISPA FCC Committee Chair > fcc_ch...@wispa.org <mailto:fcc_ch...@wispa.org> > 419-261-5996 > >> On May 5, 2017, at 12:05 AM, David Williamson >> <dwil

Re: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

017 12:05 AM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question Can someone comment on whether this new ruling is going to pass or not: New FAA Marking Requirements May Impact Rural Towers Under 200 Feet A recently passed law, the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act o

Re: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

<dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com> To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 11:05:07 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question Can someone comment on whether this new ruling is going to pass or not: New FAA Marking Requirements May Impact Rural Towers Under 200 F

Re: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

. If the FAA follows the spirit of the law it should not generally effect us - but we don’t know what they are going to do since they have not started yet. Mark Radabaugh WISPA FCC Committee Chair fcc_ch...@wispa.org 419-261-5996 > On May 5, 2017, at 12:05 AM, David Williamson > <

Re: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

GEEZE... can a guy get a break? Joe Lenig VABB From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of David Williamson Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 12:05 AM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question Can someone comment on whether

[WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

Can someone comment on whether this new ruling is going to pass or not: New FAA Marking Requirements May Impact Rural Towers Under 200 Feet A recently passed law, the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (Act), will affect certain towers that are between fifty (50) and two

Re: [WISPA] FCC 477 reminder

Coverage I would Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 17, 2017 5:39 PM, "William C Bardwell" wrote: > Do you have to file 477 if not currently operating with customers? I'm > building network but only using

Re: [WISPA] FCC 477 reminder

IANAL but I would, because it will get you set up in the system and start to put you on the map where you are offering services. My .02 On 2/17/2017 5:39 PM, William C Bardwell wrote: Do you have to file 477 if not currently operating with customers? I'm building network but only using

Re: [WISPA] FCC 477 reminder

Do you have to file 477 if not currently operating with customers? I'm building network but only using personally. On Feb 17, 2017 1:48 PM, "Jim Patient" wrote: > 11 days, 11 hours, 11 minutes, and 11 seconds from now your 477 > submission is due. > > > > > > [image:

Re: [WISPA] FCC 477 reminder

You sent that email 11 milliseconds early =/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jim Patient wrote: > 11 days, 11 hours, 11 minutes, and 11 seconds from now your 477 >

[WISPA] FCC 477 reminder

11 days, 11 hours, 11 minutes, and 11 seconds from now your 477 submission is due. [JimPatientSignatureV2] jpati...@linktechs.net www.LinkTechs.net | www.TowerCoverage.com [usa_flag] Phone: 314-735-0270

Re: [WISPA] FCC NOI for Cellular 24GHz (and a note about 5GHz...)

General List wireless@wispa.org, a...@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 5:50:44 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC NOI for Cellular 24GHz (and a note about 5GHz...) http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/10/19/34/gigabit-cellular-networks-could-happen-with-24ghz-spectrum -- Josh Reynolds

[WISPA] FCC NOI for Cellular 24GHz (and a note about 5GHz...)

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/10/19/34/gigabit-cellular-networks-could-happen-with-24ghz-spectrum -- Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com ___ Wireless mailing list

[WISPA] FCC PET LAb goodies in July

Is it Xmas in July? Lots of FCC approval goodies coming out… Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] FCC PET LAb goodies in July

Did you mean to include a URL with this message? On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote: Is it Xmas in July? Lots of FCC approval goodies coming out… Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr

[WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question

So I have been reading on this topic lately On the financial side the FCC is going to fund for 10 years on monthly installments what? All the locations on a high cost census track that you deployed or the ones that actually subscribe? Sent from my Motorola Startac...

Re: [WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question

Deployed to. The whole thing sounds like a freaking play to the cable cos (imagine that). From my understanding, if you were a very large provider and wanted to maintain market-share and not let a competitor build out in your area with federal funding, you could submit a bid for the

Re: [WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question

Why would you bid $1 , if you wanted to lock the area. You would have build out already? Sent from my Motorola Startac... On Jul 31, 2014, at 7:26 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com wrote: Deployed to. The whole thing sounds like a freaking play to the cable cos (imagine that).

Re: [WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question

It depends. I know of large ISPs with heafty cash reserves set aside for various projects, and it wouldn't be outside of their realm of morality to pull a stunt like that. Josh Reynolds, CIO SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 07/31/2014 03:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: Why would you bid $1 , if

Re: [WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question

: [WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question It depends. I know of large ISPs with heafty cash reserves set aside for various projects, and it wouldn't be outside of their realm of morality to pull a stunt like that. Josh Reynolds, CIO SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 07/31/2014 03

Re: [WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:50 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Broadband experiments phase 2 funding question It depends. I know of large ISPs with heafty cash reserves set aside for various projects, and it wouldn't be outside

[WISPA] FCC proposes... Citizens Broadband Radio Service.

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/04/fcc-proposes-sharing-1 50mhz-of-federal-spectrum-with-wireless-broadband/ The FCC today released a proposal to make 150MHz of mostly federally held spectrum in the 3.5GHz band available to share between the government, priority access

[WISPA] FCC to propose new Net Neutrality Rules

In case you missed it: http://on.wsj.com/1jC9dVR The Federal Communications Commission plans to propose new open Internet rules on Thursday that would allow content companies to pay Internet service providers for special access to consumers, according to a person familiar with the proposal.

Re: [WISPA] FCC to propose new Net Neutrality Rules

(wireless@wispa.org) wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 3:07:39 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC to propose new Net Neutrality Rules In case you missed it: http://on.wsj.com/1jC9dVR The Federal Communications Commission plans to propose new open Internet rules on Thursday

[WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules for more power

http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/story/fcc-changes-rules-57-64-ghz-ban d-enhance-wireless-backhaul/2013-08-09?utm_source=Twitter http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/story/fcc-changes-rules-57-64-ghz-ba nd-enhance-wireless-backhaul/2013-08-09?utm_source=Twitterutm_medium=Editor

[WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules for more power

http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/story/fcc-changes-rules-57-64-ghz-band-enhance-wireless-backhaul/2013-08-09?utm_source=Twitterutm_medium=Editorutm_campaign=SocialMedia ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules for more power

General List (wireless@wispa.org) wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 9:05:04 AM Subject: [WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules for more power http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/story/fcc-changes-rules-57-64-ghz-band-enhance-wireless-backhaul/2013-08-09?utm_source

Re: [WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules for more power

10:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules for more power *nods* I read the article, but it was short on details and I was short on time to actually look up what they did. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com

Re: [WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules for more power

be watching? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 9:14:48 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC revises 60 Ghz rules

Re: [WISPA] FCC Chairman Genachowski to step down

- From: Sean Heskett To: a...@afmug.com ; us...@wug.cc ; WISPAGeneral List Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 6:49 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC Chairman Genachowski to step down Just FYI...not sure if this is good, bad or ugly??? http://news.yahoo.com/fcc-chairman-genachowski-step-down

[WISPA] FCC Chairman Genachowski to step down

Just FYI...not sure if this is good, bad or ugly??? http://news.yahoo.com/fcc-chairman-genachowski-step-down-141103205--finance.html ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

[WISPA] FCC 3.5 Ghz Workshop Live

Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] FCC 3.5 Ghz Workshop Live

http://www.fcc.gov/live Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 From: a...@afmug.com [mailto:a...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:19 AM To: a...@afmug.com; WISPA General List Subject:

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

Message--- From: Rick Harnish Date: 11/29/2012 2:53:28 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc! Are you on the Louisiana Broadband Map? http://www.bakerbb.com/labroadbandmapping/ My contact in Louisiana is: Mr. Craig Johnson Louisiana

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

and may help. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Doug Clark Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:01 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc! Correct me if I am wrong here Rick, it will be fruitless

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

Excellent point. ---Original Message--- From: Fred Goldstein Date: 11/30/2012 9:10:00 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc! At 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Rick Harnish wrote: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

[ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Doug Clark Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:01 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc! Correct me if I am wrong here Rick, it will be fruitless to do the map unless you are able to maintain

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV. Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100?

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

I assumed he meant that Canopy 900mHz can not provide speeds above that. ---Original Message--- From: Matt Date: 11/30/2012 9:46:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc! approach is used, you could comment that raising

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

At 11/30/2012 11:45 AM, Matt wrote: approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV. Are you saying no one is providing

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV. Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100?

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

the rules. Thank You, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Fred Goldstein Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:59 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

Webster www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Brian Webster Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 3:27 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

At 11/30/2012 03:26 PM, Brian Webster wrote: The rule as it stands now is 3 meg down and 768 up. The 4 meg down and 1 meg up was something put in the National Broadband Plan by the white house team. Problem with that is the National Broadband Map (of which was already spec'd out when they wrote

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

Rick, I thought that we did this task, but please tell me how I can confirm. - Cliff On 11/28/12 4:45 PM, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote: Fred, I assure you the WISPA FCC Committee is indeed on this. You make great points and we appreciate your review. You are definitely correct

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc! Rick, I thought that we did this task, but please tell me how I can confirm. - Cliff On 11/28/12 4:45 PM, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote: Fred, I assure you the WISPA FCC Committee is indeed

[WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

The FCC's home page ( transition.fcc.gov ) has an item about Connect America Fund, posted with no description. This turns out to be a further NPRM about Phase I funding. As you may recall, CAF Phase I was the short-term (2012) step that offered $775 per line to price-cap ILECs (the Bells and

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

Fred, I assure you the WISPA FCC Committee is indeed on this. You make great points and we appreciate your review. You are definitely correct, that WISPs NEED to get on the National Broadband Map NOW! Those that don't will be suffering from subsidized competition. Anyone who does not know who

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

Perhaps renewed efforts with the vendors? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:45:15 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

For a one time payment of $775 per home, I can connect ALL the unconnected homes in my county... But that is not how it works, is it? I'll be buried in red tape and paper for the rest of my life, right? And, of course, since I took their money, they can now

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

At 11/28/2012 05:56 PM, Blair Davis wrote: For a one time payment of $775 per home, I can connect ALL the unconnected homes in my county... But that is not how it works, is it? Alas, Phase I is for incumbents only. Phase II, when it happens next year, will allow others to bid. This will

Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Baaaackkkk!

General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc! Fred, I assure you the WISPA FCC Committee is indeed on this. You make great points and we appreciate your review. You are definitely correct, that WISPs NEED to get on the National Broadband Map NOW! Those

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

@wispa.org, a...@afmug.com, us...@wug.cc, color...@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report Hi all, Sorry for all the cross posts on multiple lists but this seems troubling to me. We submitted our coverage data to the state of Colorado and they submitted our data for the national map

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

I have done all that you ask here. I am on EVERY other map ever made by ALL other agencies and they act like I do not exist on this one. Total BS. Scriv On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote: 1. WISPs need to submit their information. 2. WISPs need to be

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: John Scrivner j...@mvn.net To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 11:41:57 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report I have done all

[WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

Hi all, Sorry for all the cross posts on multiple lists but this seems troubling to me. We submitted our coverage data to the state of Colorado and they submitted our data for the national map. However, this FCC broadband deployment report includes this map which doesn't show our coverage.

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

Our coverage area is not displayed on that map. Is it only including wireline providers? On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: Hi all, Sorry for all the cross posts on multiple lists but this seems troubling to me. We submitted our coverage data to the state of

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

My coverage update for the 2nd to last round is not there,but the rest is. The map is for 3Meg svc. and up also. --- On Thu, 8/23/12, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote: From: Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us Subject: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report To: wireless@wispa.org, a...@afmug.com

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

if you hover over a county a popup chart on the right shows up and displays the demographics for that county and % of broadband that is Fiber, Cable, DSL, or fixed wireless. both the counties we serve show 0% fixed wireless. -sean On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Chris Fabien

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

wow, they have my area as covered as NON-Rural DSL and Cable no wireless links at all.. I think someone fixed the books on this info. As its completely BS.. 1. everything out here in our area is Rural.. 2. No wireless listed at ALL ( there are 2 providers ourselves and the telco to the south of

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

Where? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.com wrote: wow, they have my area as covered as NON-Rural DSL and Cable no wireless links at all.. I think someone fixed the

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

1. WISPs need to submit their information. 2. WISPs need to be diligent about working with their State mapping agency to correct wrong information. No one else is going to do it for us. On

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

We did submit, and have worked with the mapping agency in colorado a number of times.. :( On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote: 1. WISPs need to submit their information. 2. WISPs need to be diligent about working with their State mapping agency to correct wrong

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Sean Heskett Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:29 PM To: wireless@wispa.org; a...@afmug.com; us...@wug.cc; color...@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report Hi all, Sorry for all the cross posts on multiple lists but this seems troubling to me

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

Great! Keep working with the mapping agency until they get it right. On 8/23/2012 3:17 PM, Ryan Ghering wrote: We did submit, and have worked with the mapping agency in colorado a number of times.. :( On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM,

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

ditto. we have worked with the colorado agency and i have contacted him today about this issue. -sean On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.com wrote: We did submit, and have worked with the mapping agency in colorado a number of times.. :( On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at

Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report

Thanks Rick! --- On Thu, 8/23/12, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote: From: Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC broadband deployment report To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org, a...@afmug.com, us...@wug.cc, color...@wispa.org Date: Thursday, August 23, 2012, 6:18

[WISPA] FCC FNPRM on Universal Service contributions -- ISPs could be taxed

Over the past few years, the FCC has been redesigning its Universal Service Fund. In last fall's CAF Order, new rules for dispersing the fund were laid out. We've discussed that a bit here. Last week, the FCC adopted a new Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, this time on how the funds for

[WISPA] FCC FNPRM on Universal Service contributions -- ISPs could be taxed

Over the past few years, the FCC has been redesigning its Universal Service Fund. In last fall's CAF Order, new rules for dispersing the fund were laid out. We've discussed that a bit here. Last week, the FCC adopted a new Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, this time on how the funds for

[WISPA] FCC report blasts T-Mobile merger, ATT cries about it

Boo hoo! http://venturebeat.com/2011/11/30/fcc-report-att-t-mobile-merger/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

but not that one. Steve Barnes General Manager PCS-WIN / RC-WiFi -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scottie Arnett Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:58 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs At 11/21/2011 08:04 PM, you wrote: Yes agreed, its not nearly as bad as it could have been. But I still say ARRGGG! Price Cap Carriers will be offered $775

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Fred R. Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 6:02 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs On Friday, the FCC finally released

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

-- they at least made some effort to balance it a little. - Original Message - From: Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs At 11/21/2011

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

At 11/22/2011 11:53 AM, Sam Tetherow wrote: Is there any provision in the document for reducing funding in the future as areas get overbuilt? Or are we really looking at a 6-8month land grab? Good question. I see two land grabs, actually, Phase 1 and 2, both in 2012, but potentially a few

[WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

On Friday, the FCC finally released the Order in their Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Fund docket. The executive summary had come out with the Adoption at last month's FCC Public Meeting, but the 759-page (!) Order took a while to finish. The results, from a WISP perspective,

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:02 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs On Friday, the FCC finally released the Order in their Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Fund docket. The executive summary had come out

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Fred R. Goldstein Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:03 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs On Friday, the FCC finally released the Order in their Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Fund docket

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Fred R. Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 6:02 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

At 11/21/2011 07:50 PM, Scottie Arnett wrote: How can you offer voice if you can not get local phone number's because of a rural telephone cooperative? I don't believe a rural cooperative can prevent you from pulling numbers from the NANPA. They are even required to interconnect with you for

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

, but it could have been worse. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Fred R. Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 6:02 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

- Original Message - From: Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs At 11/21/2011 07:50 PM, Scottie Arnett wrote: How can you offer voice

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

Goldsteinfgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs At 11/21/2011 07:50 PM, Scottie Arnett wrote: How can you offer voice if you can not get local phone

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

At 11/21/2011 09:29 PM, you wrote: The only other telcos/cellcos here that have local numbers are US Cellular and Verizon. None of the big VOIP carriers do, such as Vonage/Packet8/take your pick. They have NO Clec's here either. I like to think of that as a challenge. ;-) The good news is that

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs http://www.localcallingguide.com/lca_switch.php?tandem=NSVNTNGN00T Looks like all RLECs, but maybe you'd have luck with one of them. - Mike Hammett

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs At 11/21/2011 09:29 PM, you wrote: The only other telcos/cellcos here that have local numbers are US Cellular and Verizon. None of the big VOIP carriers do

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

-ed.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:14 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs Please explain about the Livingston exchange!!! I have been trying to break this barrier for almost 12 years. Scottie Arnett

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

Message - From: Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:14 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs Please explain about the Livingston exchange!!! I have been trying to break

Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs

...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:38 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC releases USF/ICC Order, rules on subsidizing ILECs At 11/21/2011 11:18 PM, Scottie Arnett wrote: Re-reading your posts brings me to another question.has any VOIP carriers ever

Re: [WISPA] WISPA FCC Filing on Poles, Rights of Way, etc.

, questions are welcomed. Respectfully Submitted, Jack Unger Chair - WISPA FCC Committee 818-227-4220 -- Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. Author (2003) - Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks Serving the WISP, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993 www.ask

[WISPA] FCC webinar on 477

Title: signature http://www.fcc.gov/events/form-477-compliance-webinar -- Martha Huizenga DC Access, LLC 202-546-5898 Friendly, Local, Affordable, Internet! Connecting the

[WISPA] FCC 5.4 gig training

Just wondering How many are going to join the What's legal, what's not webinar today? marlon WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] FCC 5.4 gig training

Current count 161 registered -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181) Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 11:05 AM To: WISPA General List Cc: Principal WISPA Member List Subject: [WISPA] FCC 5.4

Re: [WISPA] FCC 5.4 gig training

I plan to. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181) o...@odessaoffice.com wrote: Just wondering How many are going to join the What's legal, what's not webinar

Re: [WISPA] FCC 5.4 gig training

Is it possible to receive slides and/or video from this? I was registered to watch this, but was pulled away to a conference out of town. The guy I asked to fill in didn't come through for me. I'd really like to have access to this info though. Rick, can you help? -- Blake Covarrubias On Jul

[WISPA] FCC Refuses to Say Wireless Industry is Competitive (Again)

Duh…….. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387751,00.asp - Cliff LeBoeuf Computer Sales Services, Inc. 985-879-3219 Www.cssla.com [www.cssla.com.png] inline: 5D657671-45FA-4B9E-ABF6-C4518FB95D78[15].png

Re: [WISPA] FCC Refuses to Say Wireless Industry is Competitive (Again)

cat /this/thread 2 /dev/null Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Cliff Leboeuf cliff.lebo...@cssla.comwrote: Duh…….. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2387751,00.asp

[WISPA] FCC NPRM for Licensed Links in 7 and 13 Ghz

Anyone has the link for the latest news on this? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 WISPA Wants You! Join today!

Re: [WISPA] FCC NPRM for Licensed Links in 7 and 13 Ghz

On 6/8/2011 11:11 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: Anyone has the link for the latest news on this? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 I posted it yesterday leon - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG -

Re: [WISPA] FCC NPRM for Licensed Links in 7 and 13 Ghz

: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:11 AM To: WISPA General List; motor...@afmug.com Subject: [WISPA] FCC NPRM for Licensed Links in 7 and 13 Ghz Anyone has the link for the latest news on this? Gino

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >