It wasn't working at the time. I don't know if it was a signal issue
though, this guy just ended up being in a good spot to beta test worst
case 3.65GHz scenario.
On 6/22/2011 10:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> What was the signal of the first link in 900?
>
> On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, "Simon Westl
: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 Airmax
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
linked up with a noise
What was the signal of the first link in 900?
On Jun 22, 2011 11:41 AM, "Simon Westlake" wrote:
> I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
>
> The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
> if 3.65GHz could handle it.
>
> I am using one of
I am shooting through a hill and a forest, about ~2.5miles with 3.65GHz.
The link was marginal at 900MHz, I really did this one as a test to see
if 3.65GHz could handle it.
I am using one of the KPP reflectors on the Nanostation as a test. It is
linked up with a noise floor of -95 at about -85
Less coverage then 3.65 for sure.
On Jun 22, 2011 11:28 AM, "Patrick D. Nix, Jr"
wrote:
> How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
> only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
> switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issu
How does the Ubnt 3.65 perform where going thru light foliage perhaps
only one or two trees? What kind of throughput? We are thinking of
switching some of our 2.4 over to 3.65 because of interference issues.
Thanks
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
I
ubnt_us...@wispa.org or the forum that Ubiquiti has.
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of John Scrivner
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 11:54 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WIS
Yes it is: ubnt_users
On Dec 18, 2010 11:54 AM, "John Scrivner" wrote:
> I would like to join up with other users of Ubiquiti products to
> openly discuss the platform. Is there one email list for them that is
> the dominant list of use by most users of their products?
> Thank you,
> John Scrivner
I would like to join up with other users of Ubiquiti products to
openly discuss the platform. Is there one email list for them that is
the dominant list of use by most users of their products?
Thank you,
John Scrivner
---
3, 2010 10:16 PM
To: ubnt-us...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List'; memb...@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Releases Online Path Calculator
http://www.ubnt.com/airlink/
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 WISPA Office
Skype:
http://www.ubnt.com/airlink/
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
rharn...@wispa.org
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http
Mike was drinking that night. Happens..
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jayson Baker
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti RMA Process
Yeah, they rock. Although, the last two
Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Baird
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:06 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti RMA Process
>
> Ubiquiti used to be hit and miss w
Michael Baird
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:06 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti RMA Process
Ubiquiti used to be hit and miss with RMA's, they have improved the
process over time.
Regards
Michael Baird
> I have been throughly impressed with the RMA process at
Yes, the RMA turnaround time has been impressive.
Frank Keeney
http://www.wlanparts.com
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:06 AM
Ubiquiti used to be hit and miss with RMA's, they have improved the
process over time.
---
Ubiquiti used to be hit and miss with RMA's, they have improved the
process over time.
Regards
Michael Baird
> I have been throughly impressed with the RMA process at Ubiquiti. I had
> some blown up Bullets and they processed the RMA very quickly and had
> new units back to me within a few weeks
I agree.
Though I don't know how Tranzeo was, I just threw them on the ground
and put up Mikrotik. Engenius was about as enjoyable as getting my
tooth pulled...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Chr
I have been throughly impressed with the RMA process at Ubiquiti. I had
some blown up Bullets and they processed the RMA very quickly and had
new units back to me within a few weeks. After dealing with the
extremely long RMA process that Tranzeo has, it's refreshing to see a
company like Ubiquiti
They're fantastic except I'm getting some radio lock ups. I'm going to add
STP cable with grounding very soon to see if that helps. Strange, my
RocketM5 dishes dont mind the UTP at all.
BTW: I'd install the radio on the mast if possible. Even though the radio
will slide in, they stick in place too
riginal Message-
From: <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirMax Sectors
Any feedback on thes
Which is why I install "low" and have lots of AP's in order to peek around
the corners.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Glenn Kelley
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
essage-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:46 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirMax Se
h penetration of obstacles at all.
>
> Bob-
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:46 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WI
st 30, 2010 1:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirMax Sectors
Any feedback on these at 5 Ghz would be appreciated
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wisp
uot;
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:46 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirMax Sectors
> Any feedback on these at 5 Ghz would be appreciated
>
>
>
> WISPA Wants You! Jo
What kind of feed back are you looking for ?
They work great, they have a couple of specifics, listed in the spec
sheets that you should be aware off... but no show stoppers.
(they have built-in electrical downtilt, and the antenna sectors are
speced at 6db, the 90 degree pannels are not 'symme
Any feedback on these at 5 Ghz would be appreciated
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wirele
t;>
>> >> Do you have a large RXSL differences between sides on any link?
>> >>
>> >> ++
>> >> Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
>> >> 541-969-8200 509-386-4589
>> >> +++
h.
>
> Try moving the end up or down, sometimes by only a couple of feet.
>
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "RickG"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:01 PM
> Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Perform
>>
>> ------
>> From: "RickG" mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:01 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>> Subje
Look for things like buildings with new metal roofs etc. in the path...
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Mike"
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
In my mind, you have e
ral List"
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:01 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
> Here is a good one!
>
> I have a short "link" of about 3 miles from my main tower to another.
> On the main tower I have four UBNT 5G-20-90's with RockeyM5's runnin
al Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:09 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti antenna testing yet?
>
> .If you do the calculations, you may
PA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti antenna testing yet?
.If you do the calculations, you may be surprised as to how much
coverage you can get with the narrow beam width... (it is function of AP
height as well)...
The only time you run into a problem, is when you are trying to do
gt;>
>>> On 8/11/2010 12:19 AM, Robert West wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Working fine for me as well. Depending on the terrain, we use the smaller
>>>> sectors as well as the larger ones. Small sectors going 6+ miles in flat
>>>> open ground, larger ones are
nding on the terrain, we use the smaller
>>> sectors as well as the larger ones. Small sectors going 6+ miles in flat
>>> open ground, larger ones are going 12+. With some trees.
>>>
>>> Bob-
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> F
ith some trees.
>>
>> Bob-
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 7:45 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re:
gust 10, 2010 7:45 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti antenna testing yet?
>
> Hi Tom,
> Call me naive...not quiet sure what you are asking. specifically...
>
> We have a number of the smaller Ubiquiti Sectors in use Prior to your
> email it never occu
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 7:45 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti antenna testing yet?
Hi Tom,
Call me naive...not quiet sure what you are asking. specifically...
We have a number of the smaller Ubiquiti Sectors in use Prior
Hi Tom,
Call me naive...not quiet sure what you are asking. specifically...
We have a number of the smaller Ubiquiti Sectors in use Prior to
your email it never occurred to me that I have to worry about cross pol
rejection with MIMO antennas... But on the other hand I am also not
trying to
The Ubiquiti dual pol antennas have been around for a while now.
Has anyone gained any real world testing results regarding difference in
performance for MIMO based on which antenna used.
The two Ubiquiti sector types 16/17db versus 19/20db models have
signficantly different specs on Cross pol r
You should be. LOL!
NP. Call me monday when it comes back. J/K
-B-
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: RickG
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 00:04:08
To: WISPA General List
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
oun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 3:04 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
>
> Funny timing for this discussion (which could be on the ubnt_users li
k Nash - Lists > <mailto:markl...@uwol.net>> wrote:
> >
> > How about insufficient power to the radio?
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > *From:* Mike <mailto:m...@aweiowa.com>
> > *To:* 'WISPA General List
>> > (see attached).
>> >
>> > THANKS TO ALL FOR BEING MY SECOND SET OF EYES!
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Mark Nash - Lists > > <mailto:markl...@uwol.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > How about insufficient power to th
gt; > - Original Message -
> > *From:* Mike <mailto:m...@aweiowa.com>
> > *To:* 'WISPA General List' <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
> > *Sent:* Friday, August 06, 2010 11:47 AM
> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA]
..@uwol.net>> wrote:
> >
> > How about insufficient power to the radio?
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > *From:* Mike <mailto:m...@aweiowa.com>
> > *To:* 'WISPA General List' <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
> >
; wrote:
>
> How about insufficient power to the radio?
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Mike <mailto:m...@aweiowa.com>
> *To:* 'WISPA General List' <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 06, 201
;mailto:m...@aweiowa.com>
> *To:* 'WISPA General List' <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 06, 2010 11:47 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
>
> Is one end lower than the other? If so,
are one up the tower? Can you pull
>> a new
>> >> one? Did you recrimp the ends?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On
>> >> Behalf
T5? Spare one up the tower? Can you pull a
> new
> >> one? Did you recrimp the ends?
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> >> Behalf Of RickG
> >> Sent
How about insufficient power to the radio?
- Original Message -
From: Mike
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Is one end lower than the other? If so, there could be a duct that is
already this year.
Friendly Regards,
Mike
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Weather has been hot
Read my lips: "heck yes!!!"
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Weather has been hot & humid. You t
age-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 6:17 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
>
> No transmitters that I know of. There is a WISP with
eofast, Inc, Making internet easy
> >> 541-969-8200 509-386-4589
> >> ++
> >>
> >> --
> >> From: "RickG"
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:01 PM
> &g
you my magic wand, but mine broke.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of RickG
>> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:29 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link -
I'm familiar with that particular lifestyle.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 3:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Funny t
ight
it to you.
Friendly Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 6:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
No transmitters that
t;> ++
>>
>> ------
>> From: "RickG"
>> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:01 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List"
>> Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
>>
e deploy Canopy close to you?
>
> I'd loan you my magic wand, but mine broke.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:29 PM
> To: WISPA General List
>
ce with ping, and seeing
>> loss, I would suspect the CAT5? Spare one up the tower? Can you pull a new
>> one? Did you recrimp the ends?
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Beha
easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: "RickG"
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:01 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
> Here is a good one!
>
&
, August 05, 2010 8:29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Yes, I use a netbook cause its so easy to take up the tower. I have no tried
a USB cable on a Rocket yet but I added a "spare" Ethernet cable last night.
No help.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010
29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Yes, I use a netbook cause its so easy to take up the tower. I have no
tried a USB cable on a Rocket yet but I added a "spare" Ethernet cable
last night. No help.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Mike wrote
imp the ends?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of RickG
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:09 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: R
e one up the tower? Can you pull a new
>> one? Did you recrimp the ends?
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of RickG
>> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:09 PM
>> To: WISPA G
he ends?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:09 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
>
> Loss is right,
Can you pull a new
one? Did you recrimp the ends?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 7:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Loss is right
Loss is right, Big time! The Ubiquiti spectrum analysis shows low
noise across all bands. I think its about the same as when it was
installed but not 100% sure. I'm also not sure if its enough to cause
the issue I'm experiencing. Going up to swap the AP now...will advise.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:
less"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
>
>
>> Rick,
>>
>> I hate to ask what my be obvious Are you running through a switch?
>> Could
>> it
Send some really large packet count pings to the device. Do you see any
loss?
There might be an interference source that cropped up that the regular radio
scanners won't see. Can you beg, borrow or make an analyzer?
Friendly Regards,
Mike
-
t, with the signal degradation, it sounds more like an antenna or water
> issue.
>
> -Gary-
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "RickG"
> To: ; "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link
Did ack timing get off somehow?
- Original Message -
From: "KosiNet Wireless"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
> Rick,
>
> I hate to ask what my be obvious Are
uot;
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Link - Poor Performance
Faisal, I was hoping you would reply! My answers inline below:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> do the ususal stuff...
>
> Try changing channel ?
Yes. Tried all availab
Faisal, I was hoping you would reply! My answers inline below:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> do the ususal stuff...
>
> Try changing channel ?
Yes. Tried all available channels.
> Try to shrink the channel to 10mhz or 5mhz
Yes. Results were just as bad if not worse.
>
do the ususal stuff...
Try changing channel ?
Try to shrink the channel to 10mhz or 5mhz
Any possibility of water in the cables ? or something phyiscally off
with the coax jumpers ? (AP side ?)
Since you have done everything on the far side. how about looking at the
AP Side
Run ...Airvi
Here is a good one!
I have a short "link" of about 3 miles from my main tower to another.
On the main tower I have four UBNT 5G-20-90's with RockeyM5's running
firmware 5.2. All have performed very well since I installed them
earlier this year. On the other end at the problem tower I have a 26Db
g
Both chains are both two-way streets
2x2 MIMO
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> My question (still in topic I think) is will the one chain that's still
> viable become a duplex channel and still keep passing traffic? Or are the
> chains just a one way street?
>
> Greg
>
> On J
My question (still in topic I think) is will the one chain that's still viable
become a duplex channel and still keep passing traffic? Or are the chains just
a one way street?
Greg
On Jun 18, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Jayson Baker wrote:
> What will any radio do when it's channel gets jammed with nois
What will any radio do when it's channel gets jammed with noise.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would still like to know what it's going to do when an entire
> polarization gets jammed with noise? Will the radio still pass traffic?
> Or will there be so many
Could test by setting up a pair of single pole dishes, align one,
misalign the other.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 6/12/2010 12:08 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would still like to know what it's going to do when an entire
> polarization g
: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti - Success Feels Good
I jsut wanted to mention, that it really does give peice of mind knowing
that there is a MIMO technology out there that I can count on, that is
inexpensive.
I just finished my 4th Ubiquiti PTP link (over last two weeks). Once again
We'eve installed several locations in a PTMP we use Access Point WDS for
the AP and Station WDS for subscriber, works great for bridging.
We've deployed in both noisy environments and clean, they both seem to
perform very well.
So well in fact we have choosen Airmax over Alvarion VL in the 5.8
Hi,
I would still like to know what it's going to do when an entire
polarization gets jammed with noise? Will the radio still pass traffic?
Or will there be so many errors that it will overtake the link and
nothing will work?
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> I jsut wanted to mention, tha
I jsut wanted to mention, that it really does give peice of mind knowing
that there is a MIMO technology out there that I can count on, that is
inexpensive.
I just finished my 4th Ubiquiti PTP link (over last two weeks). Once again,
Painless and perfect.
I got 38mb one way 22mb the other with 1
WISPA ANNOUNCES NEW UBIQUITI LIST
WISPA is happy to announce a new user list in conjunction with the
popular Ubiquiti Wireless product line. The Board of WISPA monitors the
members and general lists and based on the traffic generated by Ubiquiti
products feels it should have it's own discussio
>>>>> connections.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fact is...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Other VoIP companies ARE selling their service to MY wireless
> >>>>> customers.
> >>>>> And it's working just
gt;>
>>>>> Fact is...
>>>>>
>>>>> When someone calls up and says "I can't get my VoIP service
>>>>> running
>>>>> right",
>>>>> we troubleshoot it and make it quality enough for them to run
or them to run VoIP.
> >>>
> >>> So why not do it? Lots of things to consider, but quality of our
> >>> connections should not be one of them.
> >>>
> >>> Mark Nash
> >>> UnwiredWest
> >>> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
> >
: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
No. It is a thin client. Basically what happens is the thin client
acts like a receiving fax machine. So when you send a fax the thin
client receives it, converts it into a file that it sends out
ke it quality enough for them to run VoIP.
>>>>
>>>> So why not do it? Lots of things to consider, but quality of our
>>>> connections should not be one of them.
>>>>
>>>> Mark Nash
>>>> UnwiredWest
>>>> 1702 W.
s of things to consider, but quality of our
>>> connections should not be one of them.
>>>
>>> Mark Nash
>>> UnwiredWest
>>> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
>>> Suite A
>>> Eugene, OR 97402
>>> 541-998-
>>> 541-998-5599 fax
>>
BEHOLD! THE POWER OF THE LIST
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:46 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
My god, Why am I just finding
My god, Why am I just finding these now
Nick Olsen
Network Engineer / Customer Support
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:35 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Air
-5599 fax
> > http://www.unwiredwest.com
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Scott Carullo"
> > To: ; "WISPA General List" <
> wireless@wispa.org
> > >
> > Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:39 AM
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA
Weird. We use the Rocket APs and Nano5M CPE's heavily and for a TON of
VoIP. No problems.
Occasionally we'll see PPPoE re-connect, but since we VLAN the VoIP straight
through, it's unaffected.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:10 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
> Upgra
nections should not be one of them.
>
> Mark Nash
> UnwiredWest
> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
> Suite A
> Eugene, OR 97402
> 541-998-
> 541-998-5599 fax
> http://www.unwiredwest.com
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Carullo"
> To: ; "WISPA Gene
our
> connections should not be one of them.
>
> Mark Nash
> UnwiredWest
> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
> Suite A
> Eugene, OR 97402
> 541-998-
> 541-998-5599 fax
> http://www.unwiredwest.com
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Carullo"
> To:
nwiredwest.com
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Carullo"
> To:; "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
>
>
>
>> In all fairness I've got VoIP running all ov
401 - 500 of 790 matches
Mail list logo
